Thursday, November 13, 2025

Doctor Let Off With a Warning for ‘Holohoax’ Jokes.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A British junior doctor received a formal warning after posting grossly offensive comments on social media, including jokes about Jews being gassed.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Dr. Martin Whyte, the General Medical Council (GMC), and the British Medical Association (BMA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The offensive posts date back to 2018. Dr. Whyte is employed by Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “This conduct does not meet the standards required of a doctor. It risks bringing the profession into disrepute and must not be repeated.” – GMC Warning

🎯IMPACT: The warning will remain on Dr. Whyte’s record for two years, and he has been barred from representing the BMA in any capacity.

IN FULL

Dr. Martin Whyte, a British junior doctor and former executive member of the British Medical Association (BMA), has been formally warned by the General Medical Council (GMC) after making a series of grossly offensive social media posts, including jokes about Jews being gassed and comments questioning the Holocaust.

The GMC investigation described the posts as “grossly offensive” but said they “fell just short of that which would be considered serious enough to pose a risk to public protection.” Dr. Whyte, who currently works for Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust as a specialist trainee in paediatrics, has received a formal warning that will remain on his record for two years. The notice states: “This conduct does not meet the standards required of a doctor. It risks bringing the profession into disrepute and must not be repeated.”

Among the posts reviewed by regulators were remarks referring to the “decomposing carcass of the Queen,” and a post describing Conservatives as “b******” and complaining that they should not be allowed to work in medicine. In one particularly shocking message following the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue massacre, which killed 11 people, Dr. Whyte wrote: “hahaha zeig hail hahaha gas the jews hahaha just kidding but have you seen these YouTube videos about the holohoax they’re pretty convincing imo [in my opinion].”

The BMA called Dr. Whyte’s comments “totally unacceptable” and confirmed that he had been removed from all association activities as soon as the material came to light. A spokesman said: “Dr. Whyte was immediately removed from any and all BMA business when the social media material came to light. This was followed by our own internal investigation, which made this permanent. The BMA stands opposed to all forms of discrimination.”

The Campaign Against Antisemitism criticised the GMC’s response, arguing that the warning was inadequate. A spokesman said, “Every week, there is some new outrage from the medical regulatory system. Is there any level of racism against Jewish people that the GMC would consider worthy of actual disciplinary action? Antisemitism is at record highs in our society and regulators are totally asleep at the wheel. Another spectacular failure by the medical regulator.”

In the United States, the Trump administration recently froze more than $500 million in federal grants to Brown University over anti-Semitism concerns, and rapper Kanye “Ye” West has apologised to a rabbi for his previous anti-Semitic remarks, blaming them on bipolar disorder.

Meanwhile, reports have highlighted Jewish families leaving supposedly “tolerant” countries like Canada for the United States due to fears over rising hostility.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Far-Left UK Lawmaker Zarah Sultana Under Fire Over $1 Million Donations Standoff.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: British Labour Party Member of Parliament (MP) turned independent lawmaker Zarah Sultana is embroiled in a dispute over £800,000 (~$1.1 million) in donations to Your Party, which she co-founded with far-left former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zarah Sultana, Jeremy Corbyn, former Labour MP Beth Winter, former Labour mayor Jamie Driscoll, and former South African politician Andrew Feinstein.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The conflict has been ongoing since Your Party’s registration on September 30, 2025, in the United Kingdom.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Zarah did not choose to become the sole director of MOU Operations Limited, but was prepared to take on this responsibility to ensure funds are transferred as quickly as possible.” – Spokesman for Zarah Sultana

🎯IMPACT: The internal dispute over funds has created a “low trust environment” and is affecting preparations for Your Party’s founding conference.

IN FULL

Zarah Sultana, a former Member of Parliament (MP) for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party who now sits in the House of Commons as an independent, is at the center of a controversy involving ÂŁ800,000 (~$1.1 million) in donations for Your Party, a political group she co-founded with far-left former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Sultana currently manages these funds through a company, MOU Operations, following the resignation of its previous directors.

The funds, intended for Your Party—comprised chiefly of far-left Labour outcasts like Corbyn and pro-Gaza Muslim politicians dissatisfied with Starmer’s Middle East policy—have not been fully transferred, leading to tensions within the party. Sultana has agreed to transfer ÂŁ600,000 (~$790,000) in three installments, starting with ÂŁ200,000 (~$263,000), but party sources are demanding the entire amount be paid immediately.

The dispute follows the party’s registration with the Electoral Commission on September 30. Sultana stepped in as the sole director of MOU Operations after the previous directors, including former Labour MP Beth Winter, resigned, citing concerns about governance.

Sultana’s spokesman claims she is conducting “due diligence” before transferring the funds, which are also tied up with MOU’s costs and liabilities. However, some within Your Party accuse her of using the funds for political leverage.

The controversy has affected the party’s preparations for its founding conference, with organizers expressing frustration over limited resources.

Image by ReelNews.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Takes Out Two Narco-Terrorist Boats in the Pacific.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. military executed two lethal strikes on drug-smuggling vessels in the Pacific Ocean, killing six narco-terrorists.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, U.S. military forces, and six alleged narco-terrorists.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Strikes occurred on November 9 in the Eastern Pacific; announcement made Monday morning.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Yesterday, at the direction of President Trump, two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations.” – Pete Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The operation marks the 18th lethal strike on drug-smuggling vessels in recent months, with approximately 75 individuals killed.

IN FULL

The U.S. military carried out two deadly strikes on November 9 against vessels in the eastern Pacific Ocean operated by narco-terrorist organizations. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced the operation Monday morning, saying the strikes were conducted under the direction of President Donald J. Trump.

“Yesterday, at the direction of President Trump, two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations,” Hegseth said in a statement. He added that U.S. intelligence linked the vessels to illicit narcotics trafficking.

According to Hegseth, both vessels were in international waters, each carrying three male narco-terrorists. All six were killed, and no U.S. forces were harmed. The Pentagon said the action marks the 18th lethal strike against drug-smuggling vessels in recent months, bringing the total number killed to roughly 75.

The Trump administration has sharply increased military action against Latin American drug cartels, with the President designating several as terrorist organizations and accusing Venezuela’s government of facilitating drug trafficking into the United States. “Under President Trump, we are protecting the homeland and killing these cartel terrorists who wish to harm our country and its people,” Hegseth said.

The two latest strikes follow a series of operations that have expanded U.S. military activity into the Pacific. In late October, 14 alleged narco-terrorists were killed in multiple strikes in the eastern Pacific, part of a growing campaign to target maritime smuggling routes. Earlier operations in October included attacks off the coast of Colombia, where U.S. forces struck boats linked to the ELN guerrilla group, and others targeting suspected cartel vessels operating beyond national waters.

Critics like the globalist United Nations have questioned the legality of the strikes, calling them extrajudicial killings that could violate international law. Senate Democrats have demanded to see the legal justifications behind the operations and for a list of organizations deemed targetable by the administration. The White House has defended the campaign, insisting that President Trump has a mandate from the American people to take strong action against cartels and that the operations are consistent with U.S. national security interests.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Supreme Court to Rule on Legality of Late Mail-In Ballots.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case concerning the legality of accepting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The case, Watson v. Republican National Committee, challenges Mississippi’s mail-in ballot law, with arguments from state election officials and the Republican National Committee (RNC).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The case arises from Mississippi and will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court following a reversal by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The election has then occurred, even if election officials do not receive all ballots by that day.” – State of Mississippi’s petition to the Supreme Court

🎯IMPACT: The court’s decision could set a national precedent on how mail-in ballots are handled and affect voting policies in several states.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will hear Watson v. Republican National Committee, a case challenging Mississippi‘s law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day, provided they were postmarked by Election Day.

Mississippi election officials argue that a vote is cast when a ballot is postmarked, regardless of when it is received. “The election has then occurred, even if election officials do not receive all ballots by that day,” the state said in its petition. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal law mandates elections occur on a single day, and allowing late-arriving ballots undermines this principle.

Sixteen states, along with Washington, D.C., Guam, and Puerto Rico, currently allow mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day. This policy aims to accommodate voters affected by slow mail delivery. A federal judge initially upheld Mississippi’s law, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision.

Another case, Bost v. Illinois, is also under consideration by the court. It challenges Illinois‘ practice of counting ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day. Mississippi has requested that the court delay its ruling on Watson until the Illinois case is decided.

Additionally, the Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which could limit the scope of the landmark law.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Federal Agents Targeted in Shootings After Gang Bounty Announced.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Federal immigration agents were targeted in four violent attacks during enforcement operations in Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Federal immigration agents, Chicago police, protesters, the Latin Kings, and a gunman who remains at large.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Saturday in Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood, spanning several city blocks.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Make no mistake: Our mission will continue despite the violence.” – Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin

🎯IMPACT: Nine arrests were made, with DHS working alongside the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Chicago police to locate the gunman and review security measures.

IN FULL

Federal law enforcement has launched a manhunt in Chicago, Illinois, after immigration agents came under fire from what is believed to be members of the Latin Kings gang in Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood on Saturday. According to officials with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), agents were targeted in four separate incidents, with the shootings believed to be tied to a bounty issued by the Latin Kings gang on any federal law enforcement involved in Operation Midway Blitz.

The violence began when agents were boxed into a street and alley while making an arrest, and a man driving a black Jeep opened fire before fleeing the scene. Crowds escalated the confrontation by throwing bricks and paint cans from rooftops, prompting agents to deploy a flash-bang device. Chicago police assisted in evacuating the area. Several vehicles sustained damage.

The unrest spanned several city blocks, with demonstrators attempting to breach the perimeter of a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) facility and ramming agents’ vehicles on four occasions. Protesters blocked streets and continued to hurl objects, leading agents to use crowd control measures to clear a path. Over the course of three hours, nine people were arrested, including eight U.S. citizens and one non-citizen, on charges ranging from assault to obstruction. DHS confirmed that the gunman remains at large.

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (D) and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D), accusing them of fostering hostility toward law enforcement. “J.B. Pritzker and Brandon Johnson have fueled an environment of lawlessness and assault on federal law enforcement,” McLaughlin stated.

She described the attacks as “unprecedented” and attributed the violence to anti-police rhetoric. “Make no mistake: Our mission will continue despite the violence,” she added, warning that those who target law enforcement will face consequences.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

1,600 Flights Cancelled, Trump Pushes Bonus for Air Traffic Controllers Who Never Left Work.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Over 1,600 flights were canceled within, into, or out of the U.S. on Monday morning, with more than 3,000 delays reported.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and air traffic controllers, particularly at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson Airport.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Since Friday, with significant disruptions at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, the busiest in the world.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Eighteen of the 22 controllers at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport didn’t come to work Saturday.” – Sean Duffy

🎯IMPACT: Over 5,500 flights have been canceled overall, with thousands more delayed.

IN FULL

Over 1,600 flights were canceled within, into, or out of the U.S. on Monday morning, according to flight-tracking website FlightAware. Additionally, more than 2,700 flights were delayed, causing widespread travel disruptions. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy revealed that only four air traffic controllers were available at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson Airport on Saturday. The airport, recognized as the busiest in the world, had 18 of its 22 controllers absent that day.

However, President Donald J. Trump is ordering federal air traffic control workers to return to their posts, even pushing for a substantial bonus for those who have worked through the Democrat government shutdown. “All Air Traffic Controllers must get back to work, NOW!!! Anyone who doesn’t will be substantially ‘docked,'” President Trump wrote on Truth Social. He continued: “For those Air Traffic Controllers who were GREAT PATRIOTS, and didn’t take ANY TIME OFF for the ‘Democrat Shutdown Hoax,’ I will be recommending a BONUS of $10,000 per person for distinguished service to our Country.”

“For those that did nothing but complain, and took time off, even though everyone knew they would be paid, IN FULL, shortly into the future, I am NOT HAPPY WITH YOU,” he added.

Flight disruptions are expected to continue into this week despite Senate Republicans overcoming the Democratic Party filibuster and advancing a bill to temporarily fund the government. Late Sunday, eight Democrats joined the Republican majority to overcome a filibuster led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). It is expected that the temporary funding bill will be finalized on Monday before moving to the House by mid-week, where it is expected to pass. By and large, the Democrat government shutdown is expected to end by late Wednesday or early Thursday.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has strongly urged lawmakers to return to Capitol Hill to prepare for the House vote, but has not yet issued a formal demand that members return to Washington, D.C.

Image by dbking.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Was This Former Capitol Police Officer the Jan 6 Pipe Bomber?

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A forensic gait analysis identified a 94-98 percent match between former Capitol Police Officer Shauni Rae Kerkhoff and the January 6 pipe-bomb suspect.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former Capitol Police Officer Shauni Rae Kerkhoff, Blaze News investigators, and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent Kyle Seraphin.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The analysis was based on video from Jan 5 and 6, 2021, near Capitol Hill, with Kerkhoff’s movements also compared to Capitol Police footage and earlier soccer footage.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Everything about that tells me that they were involved in a cover-up and have been since day one.” – Kyle Seraphin

🎯IMPACT: The findings raise questions about the FBI’s handling of the nearly five-year-long investigation.

IN FULL

A new investigation has reignited controversy over the unresolved January 6, 2021, pipe bomb case, revealing that a forensic gait analysis may link a former Capitol Police officer to the unidentified suspect. The analysis, carried out by The Blaze, reportedly found a 94 percent match between the walking style of Shauni Rae Kerkhoff, who served more than four years with the U.S. Capitol Police before joining the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in mid-2021, and the suspect seen planting pipe bombs the night before the Capitol riot. One veteran analyst involved in the study said the similarity was closer to 98 percent.

According to The Blaze, the analysis used specialized software to compare video footage of the pipe bomb suspect with earlier recordings of Kerkhoff playing soccer in Ohio. The program evaluated parameters including knee flexion, step length, and cadence. Surveillance videos from January 5 and 6, captured by Capitol Police security cameras, played a central role in the comparison.

The FBI has faced mounting criticism for its failure to identify the suspect nearly five years after the incident, despite offering a $490,000 reward for information. The two pipe bombs were discovered near the headquarters of the Republican and Democratic National Committees on January 6, diverting law enforcement attention as the Capitol was being breached. The suspect, seen wearing a gray hoodie, gloves, and carrying a backpack, was captured on surveillance cameras walking through residential neighborhoods near both political offices.

Notably, the FBI’s publicly released video footage may have been altered, with frame-rate reductions and lower resolution making accurate gait analysis more difficult. Critics say the bureau’s handling of the evidence has fueled speculation of a cover-up. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he had no knowledge of any officer involvement but he has previously expressed doubts about the federal response to the attack.

Speaking to Tucker Carlson, Sund described the events of January 6 as “a cover-up” and claimed the crowd was “crawling with feds.” He suggested that intelligence failures and delayed National Guard deployment appeared deliberate.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Former Soccer Player Convicted for Being Rude to BBC Presenters Online, Rebuked by Judge for British Flag Scarf.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Former footballer Joey Barton was convicted of sending “grossly offensive” social media posts, and a judge criticized him for wearing a Union flag-patterned scarf during the proceedings.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Joey Barton, Judge Andrew Menary KC, broadcaster Jeremy Vine, and TV pundits Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The trial took place at Liverpool Crown Court, England, with sentencing scheduled for December 8.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Might as well own up now because I’d phone the police if I saw you near a primary school on ya bike.” – Joey Barton, in a post directed at BBC broadcaster Jeremy Vine.

🎯IMPACT: The case has reignited debates around free speech, political symbolism, and the limits of provocative online commentary.

IN FULL

Former British soccer Premier League player Joey Barton has been convicted of six counts of sending “grossly offensive electronic communications with intent to cause distress or anxiety.” The case, which centered on Barton’s social media posts mocking BBC broadcaster Jeremy Vine and soccer commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko, has reignited debate over the limits of free speech in the United Kingdom.

Prosecutors told the court that Barton, 43, used his X (formerly Twitter) account, where he has 2.7 million followers, to publish posts that went beyond so-called acceptable commentary. Among them were images superimposing Ward and Aluko’s faces onto those of serial killers Fred and Rose West, referring to Vine as “bike nonce,” and suggestions that the presenter had ties to “Epstein Island.” He added in one post, “Might as well own up now because I’d phone the police if I saw you near a primary [elementary] school on ya bike.” Barton also said Aluko, who is Nigerian, of benefiting from “affirmative action” and “BLM/George Floyd nonsense.”

Barton denied any criminal intent, describing his posts as “dark and stupid humor” intended to provoke debate. His defense argued that making offensive comments should not amount to a crime and warned that the prosecution risked undermining the principle of free expression.

Judge Andrew Menary KC rebuked the former soccer player for wearing a British flag scarf in court, calling it “a stunt to make a point.” Barton was released on bail pending sentencing on December 8.

The case has sparked renewed discussion about Britain’s lack of meaningful free speech rights. Under British law, people can be prosecuted for communications deemed “grossly offensive” or intended to cause “distress”—standards that free speech advocates warn are dangerously subjective.

The Online Safety Act gives regulators further broad powers to demand the removal of supposedly “harmful content” from social media, a policy defended by leftist Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as necessary.

Earlier this year, Reform Party leader  Nigel Farage warned U.S. lawmakers that his country was “sliding into an authoritarian situation” by criminalizing online speech. Free speech advocates have also pointed to recent cases such as that of Lucy Connolly, a woman who received a draconian prison sentence for posting anti-immigrant remarks online.

Image by Carlosgg1961.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

BREAKING: Trump Issues Pardons for Giuliani, Eastman, 75 Others.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump issued pardons for members of his 2020 campaign legal team, including Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell, among others.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, Mark Meadows, and others.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made late Sunday evening, at 10:54 PM local time, via Twitter by Ed Martin, Trump’s “clemency czar.”

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “No MAGA left behind.” – Ed Martin

🎯IMPACT: The pardons reignite discussions over the 2020 election challenges and the legal fallout for those involved, including Giuliani, who faced professional disgrace and disbarment.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump granted pardons to key figures from his 2020 campaign’s legal squad, such as Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sidney Powell, and Kenneth Chesebro. The news was announced through an X (formerly Twitter) post from Ed Martin, Trump’s designated “clemency czar,” listing 77 individuals tied to various aspects of the 2020 election dispute. Martin’s post was an update to a previous post in May, in which he pledged, “No MAGA left behind.”

These acts of clemency cover those implicated in the so-called “fake elector” plot, an effort to send alternative electors in states that Joe Biden had supposedly carried. Notably, the list excludes Trump himself, with the America First leader declining to issue a self-pardon.

Beyond the so-called “fake elector” maneuver, the team under Trump filed court challenges alleging fraud in the 2020 vote. Rudy Giuliani, long hailed as “America’s Mayor” for steering New York City through 9/11, saw his reputation come under sustained assault over his part in the election pushback. He lost his law license in both Washington, D.C., and New York.

John Eastman, who advised that disgraced former Vice President Mike Pence could send disputed results back to the states for examination, suffered similar persecution, and was even debanked.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Plans to Sue BBC for Defamation Over Doctored Jan 6 Speech.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has sent a legal letter to the BBC over Panorama‘s selective editing of his 2021 Capitol riot speech, broadcast shortly before the 2024 presidential election, which spliced different sections together to make it appear as though he was calling for violence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, BBC Chairman Samir Shah, former Director-General Tim Davie, former CEO of News Deborah Turness, and Reform Party leader Nigel Farage.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The controversy arose following a BBC Panorama broadcast in 2024, which contained a highly misleading edit of the President. A whistleblower exposed the scandal in November 2025, leading to resignations.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The TOP people in the BBC, including TIM DAVIE, the BOSS, are all quitting/FIRED, because they were caught ‘doctoring’ my very good (PERFECT!) speech of January 6th.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The BBC faces allegations of institutional bias, with resignations and calls for reform from political leaders and commentators following the Trump speech scandal.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has threatened legal action against the BBC after it was revealed that the broadcaster’s Panorama program doctored his speech on January 6, 2021. The edits spliced together two different sections of the America First leader’s speech to make it look as though he was calling for violence, and removed a portion where he urged his supporters to demonstrate peacefully.

The scandal, exposed by a whistleblower, has led to the resignations of BBC Director-General Tim Davie and the CEO of News, Deborah Turness. Turness conceded that the matter had escalated to a point of harming the BBC’s reputation.

India-born BBC Chairman Samir Shah came to the organization’s defense in a letter to the British Parliament’s Culture, Media, and Sport Committee, admitting that there have been “occasions when the BBC gets things wrong” but insisting that its issues are being tackled. Of President Trump’s legal letter to the BBC, he said the broadcaster was “now considering how to reply to him,” while offering no apology. 

Notably, the Panorama programme spliced together different sections of Trump’s January 6 speech together and presented him as saying, “We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you and we fight. We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore.” In fact, the America First leader said, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women,” with the “fight like hell” comments coming almost an hour later.

Reform Party leader and longtime Trump ally Nigel Farage said he has spoken to the President, and he is “absolutely enraged” by the BBC’s behavior. Farage himself accused the broadcaster of “election interference,” with the Panorama edit having been broadcast shortly before the 2025 presidential election.  

Because the BBC is funded by a compulsory television license fee, which must be paid on pain of fines backed by the threat of imprisonment, it is required by its charter to be balanced and impartial. However, it is widely regarded as having an institutional left-wing bias, including by its own veteran broadcasters.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more