Thursday, December 11, 2025

Mamdani Defends Choice of Convicted Armed Robber for NYC Public Safety Role.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani (D) appointed a convicted armed robber, Mysonne Linen, to his public safety transition team.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, Mysonne Linen, and the Until Freedom organization.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on November 26 via Instagram; Mamdani addressed the decision on December 9.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “We will take all of their experiences and their analysis into account as we build a city for each and every person.” – Zohran Mamdani

🎯IMPACT: The decision has prompted increased scrutiny of Mamdani’s incoming team.

IN FULL

New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani (D) has defended appointing Mysonne Linen, a 49-year-old former armed robber, to advise him on criminal justice policy as part of his mayoral transition team. Mamdani described the inclusion of Linen among the more than 400 New Yorkers across 17 committees as an effort to draw on “diverse experiences and analyses from New Yorkers,” adding, “We will take all of their experiences and their analysis into account as we build a city for each and every person.”

Linen spent seven years in state prison after being convicted in the late 1990s of two armed robberies involving Bronx taxi drivers. Prosecutors say that in 1997, he struck one driver with a beer bottle during a robbery, and in 1998, held another driver at gunpoint, allegations both victims testified to. Linen’s defense at the time argued he had no motive, claiming he was focused on a budding music career. He had reportedly worked as a songwriter for prominent artists such as Lil’ Kim and Mase. Ultimately, he served seven years of a possible 25-year sentence and maintains that he was wrongfully accused.

The appointment of Linen, co-founder of the organization Until Freedom, has stirred sharp criticism. Some law enforcement groups and political opponents argue that entrusting criminal justice policy to someone with a serious felony conviction undermines the credibility of the incoming administration.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old Democratic Socialist and Ugandan immigrant, will assume office on January 1, 2026, having won office on a sweeping “affordability” platform that included rent freezes, fare-free public transit, universal childcare, city-owned grocery stores, and a plan to build 200,000 affordable housing units. To fund these proposals, he has called for steep tax increases on corporations and “whiter” neighborhoods.

Some of his proposals have already met resistance from state leadership. Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul, who had backed Mamdani’s candidacy, is reportedly weighing whether to raise the state corporate tax rate despite her longstanding opposition to tax hikes, as New York faces an estimated multibillion-dollar budget shortfall.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Supreme Court Considers Striking Down Campaign Finance Limits in Republican-Led Case.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court heard arguments on the legality of federal limits on coordinated political spending by parties in the case NRSC v. FEC.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), Vice President J.D. Vance, former Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH), the Federal Election Commission (FEC), and court-appointed lawyer Roman Martinez.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Arguments took place on Tuesday at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The parties have been weakened overall, and this case… starts to restore the strength of parties,” said Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

🎯IMPACT: A decision could reshape campaign finance laws and is expected by mid-2026.

IN FULL

The Supreme Court on Tuesday examined the legality of federal caps on coordinated political spending by parties, a case that could further alter campaign finance restrictions. The dispute, NRSC v. FEC, challenges limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which regulates financing for federal campaigns.

For the current election cycle, coordinated spending limits range from $61,800 to $123,000 for House races and up to $3.7 million for Senate races. The plaintiffs, including Vice President J.D. Vance, former Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH), the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), argue that these limits violate the First Amendment. A federal appeals court previously upheld the caps, relying on a 2001 Supreme Court ruling.

During oral arguments, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh seemed inclined to strike down the limits. Kavanaugh expressed concerns about the weakening of political parties compared to outside groups like super PACs, stating, “The parties have been weakened overall, and this case… starts to restore the strength of parties.”

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned lawyers sparingly, while Justice Neil Gorsuch remained silent. Liberal justices, including Sonia Sotomayor, warned that removing the caps could lead to corruption. Sotomayor criticized the court’s past rulings on campaign finance, saying, “Every time we interfere with the congressional design, we make matters worse.”

Roman Martinez, the court-appointed lawyer defending the restrictions, argued that overturning the caps could unravel decades of campaign finance law. He cautioned, “You’re going to be deluged with petitions, the dominoes are going to fall, and you’re going to have to reconstruct campaign finance law from the ground up.” The court is expected to issue its decision by mid-2026, ahead of next year’s congressional midterm elections.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Addresses Thomas, Alito Retirement Speculation.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump expressed hope that U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito remain on the bench during an interview released on Tuesday.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump and Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The comments were made during an interview released on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Well, I hope they stay, ’cause I think they’re fantastic, OK? Both of those men are fantastic.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority, including three Trump appointees, remains a significant factor in shaping U.S. policies.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump expressed his admiration for Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, stating his hope that both remain on the bench. During an interview with POLITICO’s Dasha Burns, Trump remarked, “Well, I hope they stay, ’cause I think they’re fantastic, OK? Both of those men are fantastic.”

The Supreme Court currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority, bolstered by three justices—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—appointed during Trump’s first term. This majority has played a pivotal role in rulings on immigration enforcement and federal agency reforms.

Speculation about retirements has surfaced, but neither Justice Thomas, 77, nor Justice Alito, 75, has announced any plans to step down. Reports from Reuters and The Wall Street Journal last year indicated that both justices intend to remain on the bench, with sources close to Alito noting that his decisions are not politically motivated.

Justice Thomas, the longest-serving member of the current court, was nominated by former President George H. W. Bush in 1991. Justice Alito joined the court in 2006 after being nominated by former President George W. Bush. Historically, justices such as Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy, and John Paul Stevens served well into their eighties or beyond before retiring.

Trump also criticized Democratic efforts to pack the court with ideological progressives, stating, “I will say this, the Democrats want to pack the court. They want to have 21 justices. That would be a terrible thing for this country.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Billionaire Eyes CNN Overhaul in Bid to Win Trump’s Favor Amid Mega Merger Battle.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Paramount launched a counterbid for Warner Bros Discovery, promising changes at CNN.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: David Ellison, Larry Ellison, President Donald J. Trump, Netflix, and Warner Bros Discovery.

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 2025, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles, California.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “None of them are particularly great friends of mine.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Potential changes at CNN and a significant shift in the media landscape.

IN FULL

Paramount CEO David Ellison has reportedly promised Trump officials that he would push for major changes at CNN if Paramount succeeds in acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD). Paramount, backed by billionaire Larry Ellison, is offering $77.9 billion in cash, outbidding Netflix’s $72 billion proposal.

David Ellison told Trump’s team he would implement a “significant overhaul” at CNN, a network the President frequently calls “fake news.” The potential changes could include firing hosts such as Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar. The younger Ellison has been publicly seen with Trump at the Kennedy Center Honors in recent days.

President Trump responded to the proposed media deal on December 8, saying, “None of them are particularly great friends of mine.”

President Trump slammed CNN and The New York Times for misreporting on U.S. strikes in Iran earlier this year, calling the coverage “fake news.” Meanwhile, CNN has admitted to underreporting aspects of former President Joe Biden’s health.

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos has also been engaging with the White House, though he reportedly did not meet Trump during his recent visit. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed concern over the proposed merger. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) have warned that consolidation could limit competition and consumer choice, while Republicans have raised concerns about antitrust issues.

The battle for WBD has drawn significant attention because of its potential impact on the U.S. media landscape. Analysts say the deal could reshape television news, streaming, and entertainment content, influencing how Americans receive information. Paramount’s offer represents one of the largest all-cash bids in recent media history, signaling high stakes for both companies.

The Trump administration has not publicly taken sides in the bidding war, instead monitoring potential antitrust implications.

Image by Gregor Smith.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

BBC Knew It Peddled False Story Claiming Trump Wanted Liz Cheney Shot, But Issued No Correction.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The BBC admitted to misleading viewers about Donald J. Trump, falsely claiming he suggested political opponent and former Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) be shot.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: BBC News, Donald Trump, Liz Cheney, and BBC board members.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The admission was made in an internal memo presented to the BBC board in October 2025.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “In the latest spat, Donald Trump has been accused of being petty, vindictive, and a wannabe tyrant, because he suggested that one of his political opponents should face guns, have them trained on her face.” – Sarah Smith, BBC News’s North America Editor

🎯IMPACT: There have been resignations within the BBC and ongoing questions about media bias.

IN FULL

The BBC confessed to inaccurately reporting that U.S. President Donald J. Trump called for former Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) to be shot, but the claim was never publicly corrected. This admission came in an internal memo acknowledging the error.

The controversy revolved around comments made by Trump about Liz Cheney, where he labeled her a “radical war hawk” and criticized her foreign policy stances. BBC presenters misrepresented these comments, suggesting Trump called for violence against Cheney.

“In the latest spat, Donald Trump has been accused of being petty, vindictive, and a wannabe tyrant, because he suggested that one of his political opponents should face guns, have them trained on her face,” claimed Sarah Smith, BBC News’s North America Editor, during a Six O’Clock News segment shortly before the November 2024 U.S. presidential election.

The internal memo—authored by the broadcaster’s director of the editorial complaints unit, Peter Johnston—was presented to the BBC board after concerns about bias were raised by Michael Prescott, an independent adviser. The memo was later leaked, revealing the BBC’s flawed coverage.

The BBC’s Panorama program has also faced scrutiny for editing a Trump speech to imply he incited violence resulting in the January 6 Capitol riots, an assertion the program’s producers defended. This incident contributed to the resignations of BBC executives Tim Davie and Deborah Turness.

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Religious Decline in America Shows Signs of Stabilizing.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: New research suggests a potential stabilization in the number of Americans identifying as religious, following decades of decline.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Pew Research Center, Gregory A. Smith, Conrad Hackett, and other researchers tracking religious trends.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Perhaps in the future we’ll look back and see that we were at a pivotal moment in 2025,” said Pew’s Gregory A. Smith.

🎯IMPACT: The stabilization could influence social, cultural, and political life, potentially slowing the pace of religious and civic transformation in the U.S.

IN FULL

After years in which Americans steadily became less religious, new findings from the Pew Research Center show that this downward movement has flattened since 2020. The shift stands out because previous surveys had consistently recorded declines across religious identity, practice, and belief. Gregory A. Smith, Pew’s Senior Associate Director of Research, described the recent pattern as “striking.”

Christianity remains the nation’s largest religious tradition, claimed by 62 percent of U.S. adults, and its historical influence on American society and politics continues to be significant. Several indicators of religious engagement, including how often people pray, how important they say religion is, and how frequently they attend services, have held steady in recent years. Despite steep drops in religiosity over the past decade noted by Gallup, about seven in ten adults still say they belong to a religion.

Generational contrasts remain sharp: 55 percent of adults in their twenties report a religious identity, compared with 83 percent among the oldest Americans. Their practices differ as well; older adults are far more likely to pray every day (59 percent) than younger adults (30 percent). Smith pointed out that young people frequently adopt the religious routines of the households in which they grow up, though those habits may shift as they move through adulthood.

According to Pew demographer Conrad Hackett, global trends in religious change do not follow a single pattern; as he put it, “This secular transition isn’t completely uniform, and it may not be inevitable everywhere.” Researchers note that the current leveling off could persist, yet the future direction of religious affiliation in the United States remains uncertain.

“Perhaps in the future we’ll look back and see that we were at a pivotal moment in 2025,” Smith said adding, “But historical data suggests the patterns we see today are a normal result of the youngest adults possibly following the religiousness of their parents for a few years past the age of 18, after which their religiousness begins to drop.”

Some trends have shown an increased enthusiasm for Christianity among young people, particularly young men. Following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, some observed that young men were attending Church more frequently and expressing more interest in Christianity. In Britain, young men have been flocking to the Roman Catholic Church in large numbers as well.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Blasts ‘Disaster’ Sadiq Khan, Says He Owes Mayoralty to Mass Migration.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump criticized London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, calling him a “disaster” who owes his position to mass migration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Mayor Khan, and London residents.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s comments were published on December 9, 2025, in POLITICO.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “He’s a disaster. He’s a disaster. He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: A spokesman for Khan, who has smeared Trump as racist, Islamophobic, and so on for years, called the America First leader’s latest remarks “appalling and bigoted.”

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has said that Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan, of Britain’s governing Labour Party, owes his office to mass migration. Speaking to POLITICO, the America First leader called Khan a “a horrible mayor… an incompetent mayor… he’s a horrible, vicious, disgusting mayor.”

“I think he’s done a terrible job. London’s a different place. I love London. I love London. And I hate to see it happen,” Trump continued, saying of Khan: “He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have… he gets elected because so many people have come in. They vote for him now because you know, it’s like… it’s one of those things.”

Trump also criticized European leaders more broadly, accusing “politically correct” politicians of refusing to deport illegal migrants and allowing cities such as London and Paris, France, to lose their traditional identity.

Notably, London is only around one-third White British, according to the last official census, and over 40 percent of the city’s residents were born overseas. In some London boroughs, such as Tower Hamlets, residents are complaining that their Bangladeshi heritage elected officials are not performing their duties adequately because they are preoccupied with parallel political careers in Bangladesh.

A spokesman for Mayor Khan condemned the remarks as “appalling and bigoted.” Khan, a son of Pakistani immigrants, has long championed increased immigration, claiming it is benefits the economy despite strong evidence that most lower-immigrant migrant workers are a net drain on the public finances, with migrants who do not work being an even bigger drain.

Khan has a long history of accusing Trump of racism, sexism, and so-called Islamophobia, and backed a campaign to block a state visit during Trump’s first term.

Image by John Clempner.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Japan Reels From 7.5 Magnitude Quake, Airport and Nuclear Fuel Plant Damaged, 34 Injured.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A 7.5 magnitude earthquake struck Japan, causing injuries, minor damage, and a tsunami along its Pacific coast.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Japanese authorities, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the Fire and Disaster Management Agency, and the Japan Meteorological Agency.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The quake occurred late Monday night near Aomori, Japan, with tsunami waves affecting nearby coastal regions.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “We are putting people’s lives first and doing everything we can.” – Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi

🎯IMPACT: Injuries were reported, power was disrupted, and transportation services were temporarily suspended. Authorities are monitoring for aftershocks.

IN FULL

Japan is gauging regional damage in the aftermath of a powerful 7.5 magnitude earthquake that struck late Monday night. The quake caused injuries, minor damage, and a tsunami along the Pacific coast. Authorities are warning residents about potential aftershocks as emergency teams continue to evaluate the situation.

The quake, recorded at 7.5 magnitude by Japanese authorities and 7.6 by the U.S. Geological Survey, occurred at 11:15 PM in the Pacific Ocean. Its epicenter was located 80 kilometers off the coast of Aomori, with a depth of 44 kilometers. Tsunami waves up to 70 centimeters were recorded at Kuji port in Iwate prefecture, while other coastal areas saw waves of up to 50 centimeters.

According to Japanese public broadcaster NHK, most injuries were caused by falling objects in homes and businesses. The country’s Fire and Disaster Management Agency reported that at least 34 people were injured, with one person in serious condition. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi announced the formation of an emergency task force, stating, “We are putting people’s lives first and doing everything we can.”

Approximately 800 homes lost power, and Shinkansen bullet trains were suspended in parts of the region. Power was mostly restored by Tuesday morning, according to Tohoku Electric Power Co. About 480 residents sought shelter at Hachinohe Air Base, and 18 defense helicopters were deployed for damage assessment. Some 200 passengers were stranded overnight at New Chitose Airport in Hokkaido due to structural damage in a terminal building.

The Nuclear Regulation Authority reported a 450-liter water spill at the Rokkasho fuel reprocessing plant, but confirmed that no safety concerns were raised. The Japan Meteorological Agency issued a warning of possible aftershocks and urged residents to remain prepared, citing a slight increase in the risk of a magnitude 8-level earthquake. Smaller aftershocks, including a magnitude 6.6 and 5.1, were recorded in the hours following the initial quake.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Minnesota Fraud Scandal Deepens as Feds Try to Recover Millions of Stolen Taxpayer Dollars.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump and Republican allies have launched new investigations into Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud scandal, aiming to recover stolen taxpayer funds and enforce stricter accountability measures.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Republican members of Congress, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials, state Democrats, and those charged in the fraud scheme.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The fraud occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, with ongoing investigations and legal actions taking place as of 2025.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people—there is no simpler truth,” said Alvin Winston, FBI special agent in charge.

🎯IMPACT: The investigation has led to dozens of convictions, legislative reforms in Minnesota, and an ongoing effort to recover stolen funds.

IN FULL

The Trump administration and Congress have initiated several new investigations into the Minnesota state government and the Feeding Our Future nonprofit, the latter of which is embroiled in a $250 million fraud scheme that exploited a meal program for needy children during the COVID-19 pandemic. While a number of the culprits behind the fraud—many of them of Somali origin—have been convicted, federal agencies are still attempting to recover millions in stolen taxpayer funds.

The fraud involved conspirators falsely claiming to have served tens of millions of meals to children and submitting fabricated records. The stolen funds were used to purchase luxury homes, vehicles, and other high-end items. Evidence presented during trials included cash, gold jewelry, and financial records tied to extravagant purchases. The nonprofit has numerous ties to the state’s Somali immigrant community and used those connections to shield itself from scrutiny. Whistleblowers allege Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) was complicit in attempts to cover for the Somali community.

To date, federal officials have recovered an estimated $60 million, less than half of the $250 million stolen. Efforts to trace and seize assets, both domestic and abroad, have caused delays in the recovery process. Some convicted individuals funneled money through shell corporations or used it to pay personal expenses.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel called the scheme “one of the worst” in Minnesota’s history, highlighting the misappropriation of federal funds intended to support children during a crisis. Senior FBI officials have noted that the investigation has already prompted legislative reforms in Minnesota, and additional charges are expected.

Alvin Winston, the FBI’s special agent in charge, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people — there is no simpler truth.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Tony Blair Excluded from Gaza Peace Panel After Arab States Object.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Sir Tony Blair will not hold a leading position on a proposed Gaza peace council, following objections from Arab states.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair, U.S. President Donald J. Trump, and Arab leaders.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Reported on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, regarding the Gaza peace council.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I liked Blair, but I want to make sure he’s acceptable to all parties in the peace process.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Blair may still have a peripheral role, but his involvement has been significantly reduced due to regional backlash.

IN FULL

Former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair will not hold a leading position on a proposed Gaza peace council, following strong objections from Arab states. Blair had been closely linked to a plan supported by U.S. President Donald J. Trump to rebuild Gaza following years of conflict.

Arab leaders expressed deep resentment over Blair’s role in orchestrating the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which has left lasting scars in the region. Blair’s only supporters appear to have been the United States and Israel. The backlash has resulted in Blair being quietly sidelined and dropped from consideration for the top role in overseeing Gaza‘s reconstruction.

However, it is expected that Blair will retain a peripheral role in the peace process. President Trump has previously sought to have Blair head the proposed council, but sought buy-in from regional leaders. “I liked Blair, but I want to make sure he’s acceptable to all parties in the peace process,” Trump stated, signaling his willingness to adapt to regional concerns over Blair’s involvement.

In September, President Trump unveiled a 20-point peace plan ending the war in the Gaza Strip, proposing a transitional governance system and conditions for peace. While both Israel and Hamas agreed to the terms, the process of winding down the conflict has not been entirely smooth. Both Israel and Hamas have renewed hostilities for brief periods since September, but as of now, the peace process continues.

The 20-point proposal includes a transitional governance system for Gaza, managed by a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee. This body would oversee public services and redevelopment efforts until the Palestinian Authority is prepared to assume control. This would be supervised by a “Board of Peace” chaired by President Trump and included Blair.

Image via Chatham House.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more