Sunday, September 14, 2025

Biden-Harris Accelerate Asylum Processing at NORTHERN Border.

According to internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents, the Biden-Harris government is expediting the processing of asylum seekers at the U.S.-Canada border. This follows a surge in northern migrant crossings.

The should involve changes to the operation of the “Safe Third Country” asylum agreement between the U.S. and Canada. Migrants subject to the agreement are supposed to be barred from seeking asylum in the U.S. and can be sent back to Canada, which provides ample safe refuge opportunities. Likewise, Canada can also return asylum seekers crossing into its territory from the U.S.

DHS aims to streamline the implementation of the Safe Third Country Agreement, as migrants often delay returns by consulting with lawyers at length and spending time trying to build a case that they are exempt from the agreement’s terms. However, the agency insists the changes will not compromise migrants’ right to a full asylum review.

In fiscal year 2024, 16,500 migrants were apprehended after crossing the U.S.-Canada border illegally, an increase from 10,000 in 2023 and 2,200 in 2022. This is the highest recorded number for the northern frontier.

The resources allocated to the 5,500-mile northern border are much smaller than those allocated to the southern border, which has seen millions of illegal crossings under the Biden-Harris government.

Nevertheless, the Canadian frontier is still a point of vulnerability, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Terrorist Screening Dataset (TSDS) recording that almost 86 percent of suspected terrorists entering the U.S. in fiscal year 2023 did so via the northern border.

show less
According to internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents, the Biden-Harris government is expediting the processing of asylum seekers at the U.S.-Canada border. This follows a surge in northern migrant crossings. show more

African Athletes Absconded After Olympics.

Two members of the Olympic team from the Republic of Congo have disappeared following the closing ceremony of the Paris Games, fueling speculation they may have decided to claim asylum somewhere in Europe.

It was initially believed three of the six Congolese athletes had gone missing after swimmer Aristote Impelenga, judoka Daso Kisoka, and sprinter Dominique Lasconi all failed to appear for the closing ceremonies. However, Kisoka later resurfaced just before the Congolese Olympic team’s flight back to their native country.

Aristotle Impelenga, who remains missing, is the only Congolese athlete who came close to medaling. He finished in 7th place in the first round of the men’s 100-metre race. Following the race, he failed a doping test.

It is not rare for athletes from African countries and other impoverished nations to abscond and disappear following or even during athletic events in Western countries. Last year, several handball players from Burundi disappeared while attending a tournament in Croatia. Weeks later, they were discovered applying for asylum in Belgium.

Belgian authorities stated that while the athletes were welcome to apply for asylum if they wished, they would have to return to Croatia and apply there as it was their first point of entry to the European Union. At least 82 athletes sought asylum in the United Kingdom following the 2012 Olympic games in London.

Countries in Europe continue to cope with large numbers of asylum seekers and the negative effects mass migration has had, including surging violent crime in countries like Germany. Asylum seekers and other migrants are also vastly overrepresented in welfare usage, as well as welfare fraud in countries like Sweden.

show less
Two members of the Olympic team from the Republic of Congo have disappeared following the closing ceremony of the Paris Games, fueling speculation they may have decided to claim asylum somewhere in Europe. show more

Harris Deceives Voters with Manipulated News Headlines.

Kamala Harris‘s campaign was caught manipulating news headlines and paying to promote the altered stories as search advertisements on Google.

How do Google Search ads work? They appear at the top of the page when someone searches for specific keywords related to the advertiser’s ad.

The details: Since August 3, the Harris campaign has created dozens of these search ads, with headlines that look like they come from CNN, CBS News, NPR, USA Today, and many others.

The ads link to real articles from the news outlets, but the headlines are manipulated to appear as endorsements of Harris and her policies.

Cut to the chase: They want to trick voters into thinking these ads are real headlines. They have “sponsorship” labels but they’re easy to miss.

One example: A manipulated headline from The Independent reads: “VP Harris Protects Democracy – Trump Defends Jan 6 Comments” and the article description reads: “Kamala Harris will protect voting rights for all Americans.”

Another reads: “Harris Will Lower Health Costs” and the article description reads: “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care.”

Is Trump running these shady ads? No. Google’s ad transparency center confirms this.

Is this allowed? Google’s terms of service do allow these types of ads to run on their platform and argue that because it says “Sponsored,” they’re easily distinguished from real results.

Big picture: Google is the same platform that was caught suppressing searches about Donald Trump’s attempted assassination just two weeks ago. Make no mistake—if the Trump campaign ran similar ads, they would find a problem with them.

show less
Kamala Harris's campaign was caught manipulating news headlines and paying to promote the altered stories as search advertisements on Google. show more

New Evidence Suggests Hunter Biden Illegally Acted as Foreign Agent.

Newly released State Department documents reveal Hunter Biden sought U.S. government assistance for a project in Italy on behalf of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while his father, Joe Biden, served as Vice President of the United States. The records—which the Biden-Harris government had buried and only released after the 81-year-old Democrat dropped out of the 2024  presidential race—provide additional and clear evidence that Hunter Biden illegally acted as an unregistered foreign agent.

Despite several clear instances of Hunter Biden having used his family name to lobby the U.S. government on behalf of foreign clients—including Burisma—he has never been charged with violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The lack of action by the Department of Justice (DOJ) has even resulted in some potential FARA charges passing the statute of limitations.

HELP FOR BURISMA.

The latest documents detail communications between Hunter Biden and the U.S. Departments of State and Commerce regarding a proposed Burisma geothermal energy project in Tuscany, Italy. Through a letter, Biden sought the assistance of the U.S. ambassador to Italy at the time, John R. Phillips, in making an introduction to the then-president of the Tuscany region, Enrico Rossi. Burisma was seeking to fast-track regulatory approval by Rossi.

Biden’s contact with the U.S. ambassador was met with unease at the Departments of State and Commerce. “I want to be careful about promising too much,” a Department of Commerce official wrote at the time, adding: “This is a Ukrainian company and, purely to protect ourselves, U.S.G. should not be actively advocating with the government of Italy without the company going through the D.O.C. Advocacy Center.”

A SECOND ATTEMPT.

In a separate email to an Italian businessman with ties to Rossi, Hunter Biden‘s business partner Eric Schwerin attached the letter to the U.S. ambassador, adding: “Burisma is hoping that some of its executives can get a meeting with the president to discuss their geothermal business in Tuscany.” Shortly thereafter, Hunter Biden made a second attempt to press the U.S. ambassador for an introduction to Rossi.

“The Ambassador already replied to one letter from Mr. Biden,” the Department of Commerce official wrote following Biden‘s second attempt at an introduction. They added: “He may be shopping for more support than he got here.”

Ultimately, it appears Biden‘s efforts to enlist the U.S. government’s assistance on behalf of Burisma in Tuscany were unsuccessful. There is no indication the meeting between Burisma executives and Rossi ever materialized, and eventually, the energy project fell through.

show less
Newly released State Department documents reveal Hunter Biden sought U.S. government assistance for a project in Italy on behalf of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while his father, Joe Biden, served as Vice President of the United States. The records—which the Biden-Harris government had buried and only released after the 81-year-old Democrat dropped out of the 2024  presidential race—provide additional and clear evidence that Hunter Biden illegally acted as an unregistered foreign agent. show more

Trump Sues DOJ for $100M Over Mar-a-Lago Raid.

Former President Donald J. Trump plans to file a lawsuit against the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking $100 million in damages for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) raid on his Mar-a-Lago property in 2022. Trump’s legal team alleges that the raid was carried out with the intent of political persecution, describing the raid as “tortious conduct by the United States against President Trump.”

The lawsuit stems from the FBI‘s August 8, 2022, raid on Mar-a-Lago, which occurred as part of a federal probe into Trump’s alleged retention of classified documents. A federal judge later dismissed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Trump, citing Smith’s unlawful appointment and funding under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

Attorney Daniel Epstein, representing Trump, submitted a notice to the DOJ, which has 180 days to respond before the suit moves to federal court in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein claims the raid involved intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process. He argues that Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray did not follow established protocols, including seeking the target’s consent and notifying their legal representatives.

Epstein’s memo asserts that Garland and Wray’s actions were not based on valid social, economic, and political policies but rather on principles inconsistent with constitutional standards aimed at persecuting Trump. The legal filing also indicates that the raid inflicted $15 million in damages on Trump due to legal costs.

Trump’s attorney maintains that the FBI‘s actions violated Trump’s privacy and were politically motivated. Filings also later revealed the FBI was permitted to use deadly force during the raid. He stresses that there was no constitutional basis for the search or subsequent indictment, referencing the Supreme Court’s ruling that presidents have substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts.

show less
Former President Donald J. Trump plans to file a lawsuit against the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking $100 million in damages for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) raid on his Mar-a-Lago property in 2022. Trump's legal team alleges that the raid was carried out with the intent of political persecution, describing the raid as "tortious conduct by the United States against President Trump." show more

Cops Arrest Over ONE THOUSAND Anti-Mass Migration Protesters.

Over 1,000 people have been arrested in connection with the disorder in Britain following the deadly mass stabbing of multiple young girls by a migration-background teenager in Southport, England. The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) boasts that 1,024 people have been arrested, and 575 people have been charged so far.

“We told you justice would be swift and we wouldn’t tolerate this type of criminality,” the council declared on Tuesday, adopting a bullying tone.

The youngest person currently known to have been arrested is an 11-year-old detained in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Much older protestors have also been targeted, including David Spring, a 61-year-old imprisoned for 18 months for chanting, “Who the f**k is Allah?” and making “hostile gestures” towards riot police in London.

Police, prosecutors, and judges have warned they will go after people even if they have not directly participated in any violence.

“Anybody involving themselves in this type of behavior, this type of disorder, as an active participant or a curious observer can expect to be, save for the most exceptional circumstances, remanded into custody,” said a Northern Irish judge last week, jailing an 18-year-old with no criminal record who was merely on the “periphery” of a riotous demonstration.

SCOURING SOCIAL MEDIA.

Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions of England and Wales (DPP) under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, warns that “dedicated police officers” are “scouring social media” to arrest people alleged to have incited violence or “racial hatred” amid the protests, and that problematic posters overseas may be extradited.

One man aged 51 has been imprisoned for sharing “grossly offensive” memes featuring South Asian men. Prosecutors complained one meme included South Asian men holding knives near a crying white child outside the Palace of Westminster, where Parliament is based, with the caption ‘Coming to a town near you.’

At least one woman, aged 55, has been arrested merely for sharing “inaccurate information” about the Southport suspect.

Image via Simon Dawson/No 10 Downing Street.

show less
Over 1,000 people have been arrested in connection with the disorder in Britain following the deadly mass stabbing of multiple young girls by a migration-background teenager in Southport, England. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) boasts that 1,024 people have been arrested, and 575 people have been charged so far. show more

BLASPHEMY LAW: 61-Year-Old Imprisoned for Asking, ‘Who the F***k Is Allah?’

David Spring, a 61-year-old who participated in an anti-mass migration protest following the deadly mass stabbing of several young girls in Southport, England, has been imprisoned for 18 months. He is accused of chanting, “Who the f**k is Allah?” and, per local media, making “hostile gestures” towards police and calling them “c***s.”

Judge Benedict Kelleher told Spring, a retired train driver whose wife is in poor health, “What you did could and it seems did encourage others to engage in disorder.”

After his arrest at the demonstration near Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer‘s official residence in London, the 61-year-old told officers, “I didn’t go up to London to riot. I went to complain about people put up in hotels.”

This is a reference to the over 120,000 illegal aliens who have paid criminal people-smugglers to bring them to England by sea in small boats since 2018, most of whom are planted in hotels around the country at taxpayers’ expense.

TWO-TIER JUSTICE.

Spring’s sentencing contrasts sharply with that of Black Lives Matter rioters in 2020. For instance, Astrophel Sang, a then-19-year-old who desecrated the Cenotaph memorial to Britain’s war dead and tried to set fire to the British flags adorning it, was allowed to walk free with a conditional discharge, the only real punishment being an order to pay £340 (~$435) in court costs.

Prime Minister Starmer is accused of presiding over a two-tier system of justice in response to the anti-mass migration protests and Muslim and far-left counter-protests. The former been publicly denounced and confronted aggressively by riot police. At the same time, the latter have been appeased and indulged.

The authorities are pursuing Britons who did much less than Spring, including a 55-year-old woman arrested simply for sharing “inaccurate information” about the Southport suspect on social media.

show less
David Spring, a 61-year-old who participated in an anti-mass migration protest following the deadly mass stabbing of several young girls in Southport, England, has been imprisoned for 18 months. He is accused of chanting, "Who the f**k is Allah?" and, per local media, making "hostile gestures" towards police and calling them "c***s." show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
I tried to warn you all that Sharia was coming to a neighborhood near you
I tried to warn you all that Sharia was coming to a neighborhood near you show more
for exclusive members-only insights

Biden-Harris ‘Deportation’ Program Let 90% Remain in USA.

A Biden-Harris regime program designed to swiftly remove migrant families who entered the US illegally is facing scrutiny after recent data revealed that nearly 90 percent of those enrolled have been allowed to stay.

Since its launch in May 2023, the Family Expedited Removal Program has processed 24,000 migrants, yet only 2,600 have been deported, leaving over 22,000 still in the country.

Additionally, more than 3,600 migrants have gone missing from the program and are unaccounted for.

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-TN) criticized the program, claiming it fails to effectively enforce immigration laws.

“These numbers show that the Biden-Harris [government] is not serious about securing the border or enforcing the law,” Green said. He accused President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of neglecting their duties and misleading the American public.

The program, which aimed to handle migrant families with children, involves placing an ankle monitor on one adult per family while processing their removal.

However, it includes loopholes allowing individuals to request a “fear-based” screening and, if denied, a further hearing with an immigration judge. This has led to many migrants remaining in the US despite the program’s intentions.

The program is just the latest immigration failure of the Biden-Harris regime, which has allowed millions of illegals into the United States since President Biden took office.

Harris, who was made Border Czar by Bidenrefused to reply to invitations from border states to visit key areas experiencing surges of illegal arrivals.

Several border officials have slammed Harris for her inaction on the border, with some noting the horrific crimes, including murder and rape, perpetrated by illegal aliens who entered during the Biden-Harris regime.

show less
A Biden-Harris regime program designed to swiftly remove migrant families who entered the US illegally is facing scrutiny after recent data revealed that nearly 90 percent of those enrolled have been allowed to stay. show more

Are Americans Worried About Illegals Voting? Here’s What the Data Says…

Americans are increasingly concerned about noncitizen voters illegally casting ballots in federal elections. New data from Rasmussen Reports indicates that 55 percent of American voters believe it is likely that noncitizens influence election results where they live. The polling data suggests that noncitizen voters are beginning to receive attention among the electorate after being dismissed by the corporate media for years.

The Rasmussen Reports poll also reveals an overwhelming number of American voters oppose allowing noncitizens to cast ballots in U.S. elections. A total of 85 percent of those polled said that only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Just 11 percent said noncitizens should be legally able to cast ballots. These trends were present regardless of political affiliation, with 87 percent of Republicans, 81 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of unaffiliated voters all saying that only American citizens should be legally allowed to vote.

IMPACT OF NONCITIZEN VOTES.

Corporate media outlets like the Associated Press have attempted to dismiss concerns about the election impacts noncitizen voters could make. However, evidence continues to mount, showing that noncitizens are not just voting but doing so in numbers that could prove pivotal in deciding the outcome of tight electoral contests.

The National Pulse has previously reported that election data shows a statistically significant number of noncitizens acknowledge participating in past U.S. elections. Additionally, the prosecution of noncitizen voters in North Carolina reveals that they illegally cast ballots by a ratio of three to one in favor of Democratic Party candidates. A federal investigation in the state found that some noncitizens were only allowed to register to vote by election workers after determining they’d likely support Democrats on the ballot.

Noncitizens have been able to cast ballots due to state governments granting driver’s licenses to legal and illegal immigrants. Additionally, the lack of proof of citizenship requirements in state and federal elections means that noncitizens can easily slip past the minor barriers intended to ensure only citizens cast votes.

show less
Americans are increasingly concerned about noncitizen voters illegally casting ballots in federal elections. New data from Rasmussen Reports indicates that 55 percent of American voters believe it is likely that noncitizens influence election results where they live. The polling data suggests that noncitizen voters are beginning to receive attention among the electorate after being dismissed by the corporate media for years. show more

White Cops Win Landmark Discrimination Case.

Three white police officers have succeeded in a discrimination claim after an employment tribunal determined that they were bypassed for a promotion due to their race. The tribunal found that the officers, Detective Inspector Phillip Turner-Robson, Inspector Graham Horton, and Custody Inspector Kirsteen Bishop, faced disadvantage by being excluded from a promotional opportunity within Thames Valley Police.

The tribunal found that in an effort to diversify senior staff, a decision was made to promote an “Asian” sergeant to the rank of detective inspector, bypassing the standard competitive process. Superintendent Emma Baillie made the decision after being directed by Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg to “make it happen.” The move disregarded warnings regarding the legal implications of not following competitive procedures.

The tribunal heard that in August 2022, plans were in motion to advertise a position for detective inspector in the priority crime team at Aylesbury. DI Turner-Robson expressed interest in the vacancy on the same day. However, by the following month, the superintendent had placed Sergeant Sidhu, whose first name was not mentioned, into the role without any formal promotion process.

At the time of the appointment, Sergeant Sidhu had not yet been promoted to inspector status. Despite this, she was appointed as detective inspector after the decision-makers “jumped the gun,” according to the tribunal. The tribunal noted that the Superintendent’s actions were influenced by a directive to ensure the appointment quickly, which resulted in discrimination.

Employment Judge Robin Postle ruled the decision constituted direct discrimination against the three officers, emphasizing that their right to a fair promotion process was compromised. The judge stated that the actions taken were beyond mere encouragement and disproportionately favored an officer with the protected characteristic of race.

show less
Three white police officers have succeeded in a discrimination claim after an employment tribunal determined that they were bypassed for a promotion due to their race. The tribunal found that the officers, Detective Inspector Phillip Turner-Robson, Inspector Graham Horton, and Custody Inspector Kirsteen Bishop, faced disadvantage by being excluded from a promotional opportunity within Thames Valley Police. show more