Despite record rainfall last year, wildfire-ravaged California could not store it due to a lack of infrastructure in the Democrat-ruled state. Critics have challenged Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom’s call to avoid politicizing such issues, claiming that political mismanagement is a core problem.
The escalating fires have endangered thousands of residents, homes, and natural habitats, sparking a debate over the state’s water management and political decisions. Edward Ring, director of water and energy policy at the California Policy Center, argues that the state’s focus on climate change as a primary cause of the fires overshadows more pressing issues. He cites outdated water reserve systems and flawed forestry management practices as significant issues.
During a record-breaking rainfall event last year, a large portion of the water was discharged into the ocean due to infrastructure limitations. Ring blames excessive environmental regulations, such as the Endangered Species Act, as constraints on water diversion efforts, prioritizing river flow for fish like the delta smelt and salmon.
In urban areas, Los Angeles’ stormwater drainage systems were designed to prevent flooding, not enhance water storage, exacerbating the problem. Ring indicates that inadequate investment in water infrastructure has left local reservoirs depleted and insufficient for firefighting needs.
Over 100,000 people have evacuated due to the ongoing fires, which have burned around 30,000 acres. High winds have spread the fires and prevented firefighting efforts using various types of aircraft.
President-elect Donald J. Trump has been outspoken in criticizing Democrat water mismanagement and highlighted the issue multiple times during his first presidential term. Other critics have cited cuts to fire budgets, fire spending being diverted to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) teams, and fire equipment being donated to Ukraine.
show less
