Friday, September 12, 2025

Biden’s ‘Transparent’ DOJ Redacted EVERY PAGE of Interview Transcript.

Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, has found the transcript of Joe Biden ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer‘s interview with federal investigators is so heavily redacted that it is almost incomprehensible. Speaking to Stephen K. Bannon on War Room, Kassam told viewers there is “a redaction on every single page” of the document.

“I want to show the camera what we’re dealing with here,” Kassam said, showing an “average page from the released transcript” almost completely blacked out.

“It’s way more than a third that’s redacted here,” Kassam said, estimating 60 to 65 percent of the transcript was obscured.

Following a lawsuit by the Oversight Project, Joe Biden’s Justice Department was ordered to release a transcript of Zwonitzer’s interview. The interview informed the Hur Report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information.

However, some revealing information slipped through the censorship process. The National Pulse found that the ghostwriter had admitted to deleting numerous audio records of interviews with Biden after learning he was being investigated.

“The outside observer is going to look at this and say ‘Mark Zwonitzer, President Biden‘s friend, ghostwriter, collaborator learned of the special counsel’s investigation, saw this happening and then deleted all these audio recordings,’” an investigator said to Zwonitzer.

“I’m not going to say how much of the percentage it was of my motivation,” Zwonitzer replied.

Special counsel Robert Hur weighed charging Zwonitzer with obstruction of justice but ultimately decided neither he nor Biden should be prosecuted.

show less
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, has found the transcript of Joe Biden ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer's interview with federal investigators is so heavily redacted that it is almost incomprehensible. Speaking to Stephen K. Bannon on War Room, Kassam told viewers there is "a redaction on every single page" of the document. show more

Young Thug Rapper Trial Chaos Suggests Fani Willis’s Ethical Lapses Go Well Beyond Trump Prosecution.

The ethical lapses in Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis‘s office go far beyond the impropriety of appointing her lover, Nathan Wade, as a special prosecutor on her RICO case against former President Donald J. Trump. New questions of legal ethics violations have arisen in another of Willis’s high-profile prosecutions, with the attempted jailing of defense attorney Brian Steel, who is representing rapper Young Thug.

Earlier this week, Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Ural Glanville held Steel in contempt of court after the defense attorney revealed he was made aware that the judge had held an ex parte meeting with prosecutors in Willis‘s office and one of their star witnesses. Citing the meeting, Steel moved for a mistrial in Willis’s prosecution of the Grammy Award-winning rapper and 27 others for gang-related crimes.

Instead of granting the motion, Glanville demanded that Steel break attorney-client privilege and reveal who disclosed the ex parte meeting to him. Steel refused, resulting in the contempt order.

WHAT IS WONG WITH FULTON COUNTY?

Ex parte—a legal term meaning decisions are made without all parties present—meetings, like the one involving Glanville and prosecutors, are often considered improper in a trial setting. Ethical rules typically bar an attorney from meeting with a judge or witness without legal representatives from the other party being also present.

Complicating matters, Judge Glanville on Wednesday ordered prosecutors from Willis‘s office, along with witness Kenneth Copeland and his Kayla Bumpus, to appear at a June 25 hearing to determine whether they should also be held in contempt. The judge indicated he believes one of these three parties disclosed the ex parte meeting to Steel.

Even before the most recent ethical controversy, Willis‘s prosecution of Young Thug was mired in accusations of sloppiness, which caused extensive delays in the case. The degree of impropriety by the District Attorney’s office and Judge Glanville echoes the ethical breaches that have plagued Willis’s RICO prosecution of former President Trump.

FANI’S TRUMP TROUBLES.

In March, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee ordered that either Willis or special prosecutor Nathan Wade would have to resign from the Trump production. The order came after extensive evidence was presented showing that Willis and Wade had engaged in a romantic relationship prior to the latter’s appointment as a special prosecutor on the case. Wade subsequently resigned from the District Attorney’s office.

Despite initially denying the accusations of impropriety due to her relationship with Wade, Willis eventually acknowledged that he was her lover—though both have disputed the timeline as to when they became involved. With Wade’s resignation, Willis has been allowed to remain as the prosecutor in the RICO case.

However, attorneys representing former President Trump and several of his co-defendants have appealed McAfee’s ruling. Last week, the Georgia Court of Appeals put Willis’s prosecution of Trump on hold until after the 2024 presidential election as they weigh whether the District Attorney should be disqualified from the case.

WATCH: 

show less
The ethical lapses in Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis's office go far beyond the impropriety of appointing her lover, Nathan Wade, as a special prosecutor on her RICO case against former President Donald J. Trump. New questions of legal ethics violations have arisen in another of Willis's high-profile prosecutions, with the attempted jailing of defense attorney Brian Steel, who is representing rapper Young Thug. show more

WATCH: Shock Moment Fani Willis’s Nathan Wade is ‘Signaled’ During Live CNN Interview.

Former Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade—who carried on a workplace romance with his boss, District Attorney Fani Willis—shockingly got up in the midst of a live CNN interview after being “signaled” by his attorney. The interruption occurred as anchor Kaitlan Collins pressed Wade for specifics regarding his affair with Willis.

“To… to say that, okay, these… these exact dates are… are… are at issue, and these exact dates are…” Wade said while nervously swaying and glancing about. As he began to trail off, the former Fulton County special prosecutor abruptly told Collins, while turning his attention to an individual off-camera, “I’m getting, I’m getting signaled here.”

At this point, Wade removes his microphone and steps away from Collins to consult with an individual who appears to be his attorney. The CNN cameras continue to roll while Wade and his associate huddle in a corner of the room—the content of their discussion, however, is inaudible.

After nearly half a minute, Wade returned to the interview set with Collins, asking: “Everything okay?” The CNN anchor pressed again as to when Wade’s relationship with Willis began; this time, however, the former special prosecutor delivered a deflective answer stating: “I believe the public has, through the testimony and other interviews, the public has a clear snapshot that this is just a distraction.”

Wade dismissed the matter of his relationship with Willis as being “irrelevant” to the District Attorney’s RICO prosecution of former President Donald J. Trump and over a dozen other individuals for allegedly interfering in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. In March, Judge Scott McAfee forced Wade to resign from the prosecution due to the “appearance of impropriety” regarding his relationship with Willis.

WATCH:

show less
Former Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade—who carried on a workplace romance with his boss, District Attorney Fani Willis—shockingly got up in the midst of a live CNN interview after being "signaled" by his attorney. The interruption occurred as anchor Kaitlan Collins pressed Wade for specifics regarding his affair with Willis. show more

Here’s How GOP Leadership Can Keep Bannon Out of Jail… If They Want To.

House Republican leadership can use a little-known congressional mechanism to render the contempt of Congress charges against former Trump advisors Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro moot. Speaker Mike Jonnson (R-LA) can use the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) to file an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit declaring that the Democrat-run January 6 Committee was improperly constituted and thus had no subpoena authority.

This argument was first advanced by Bannon’s lawyer, David Schoen, and expanded on by Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz in an appearance on Tim Pool this week.

“I believe the only way Steve Bannon does not go to jail is if there is a vote at an entity called the BLAG—the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group,” Gaetz said, adding: “It is made up of the Speaker of the House, the Majority Leader, the Majority Whip, the Minority Leader, and the Minority Whip. So the Republicans hold a three-two in this.”

“Bannon is going to petition for an en banc review of this determination to revoke his bail. When he does, I believe the BLAG should—and will—take a three to two vote for the House to seek to leave to file an amicus brief with the en banc court that the January 6 Committee was illegitimate,” the Flordia Republican added.

IMPROPERLY CONSTITUTED.

The BLAG is a non-legislative committee within Congress that directs the actions of the House Office of General Counsel.

House Republican leadership can use the BLAG to direct the General Counsel to file a brief with the appeals court stating that the House believes the January 6 Committee was improperly constituted by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

Former U.S. Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, among others, contends the January 6 Committee was constituted in violation of Section 2(a) of its authorizing resolution. The provision in question states: “Appointment of Members—The Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.”  However, Pelosi rejected the slate of committee members proposed by then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), with the committee ultimately only being comprised of nine members instead of the 13 required in its authorizing resolution.

An amicus brief laying out this argument from the House Office of General Counsel would be difficult for the federal appeals judges to ignore. Still, the move isn’t guaranteed to work—as the appeals court can ignore or disagree with the House counsel’s determination.

WATCH: 

Image by Gage Skidmore

show less
House Republican leadership can use a little-known congressional mechanism to render the contempt of Congress charges against former Trump advisors Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro moot. Speaker Mike Jonnson (R-LA) can use the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) to file an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit declaring that the Democrat-run January 6 Committee was improperly constituted and thus had no subpoena authority. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
Here are the contact details for the three Republicans that matter on this subject
Here are the contact details for the three Republicans that matter on this subject show more
for exclusive members-only insights

Chicago Homelessness Surges Amid Migrant Crisis.

Homelessness in Chicago has surged dramatically within the past year, reflecting a broader crisis rooted in continued economic challenges and a flood of migrants arriving from the southern border. According to the city’s annual snapshot, the number of homeless individuals has increased by 200 percent, rising from 6,139 in 2023 to 18,836 in 2024.

A significant portion of this increase comes from 13,679 “sheltered new arrivals” and 212 “unsheltered new arrivals.” The latter represents a 960 percent jump from last year’s count of 20. Additionally, 1,422 “unsheltered non-new arrivals” and 3,523 “sheltered non-new arrivals” were documented. Notably, almost 30 percent of the homeless population comprises children under 18.

The rise in homelessness coincides with the arrival of buses of migrants sent from Texas amid the Biden government’s border crisis. Chicago officials, including Maura McCauley from the Department of Family and Support Services, report efforts to resettle over 43,000 migrants.

McCauley cited the end of pandemic-era support measures and increasing housing costs as contributing factors. “We anticipated this increase and expanded our shelter capacity fivefold. Without these measures, the situation could have been unprecedented and tragic,” McCauley said.

Mayor Brandon Johnson has been a focal point of criticism due to the crisis. Community frustrations boiled over in April when Johnson proposed allocating $70 million to migrant care. Meanwhile, Johnson’s administration has imposed a 60-day limit for migrant stays in city shelters. However, officials do not foresee a mass exodus from shelters, citing staggered exit dates and residents possibly re-entering temporary shelters if necessary.

Despite public anger, Johnson continues to defend the city’s sanctuary policies. Tensions remain high as citizens demand more resources for local communities and transparency around city expenditures.

show less
Homelessness in Chicago has surged dramatically within the past year, reflecting a broader crisis rooted in continued economic challenges and a flood of migrants arriving from the southern border. According to the city’s annual snapshot, the number of homeless individuals has increased by 200 percent, rising from 6,139 in 2023 to 18,836 in 2024. show more

SHOCK DATA: 2 in 3 Brexit Voters REFUSE to Vote for UK Conservative Party.

Just one in three Brexit voters intend to vote for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s Conservative (Tory) Party in the July 4 snap election. Poll data also shows only 47 percent of the governing party’s 2019 voters intend to vote for them again.

In 2019, the Conservatives under Boris Johnson won their fourth general election in a row, with their biggest majority since the 1980s. They achieved this on a pledge to ‘Get Brexit Done’ and reduce immigration, but Brexit was only partially delivered, and immigration greatly increased. This support appears to have collapsed, with polling conducted by Professor Matt Goodwin on June 12 showing the opposition Labour Party leads them by 20 points.

Nigel Farage’s Reform Party is within two points of the Tories nationally, which Goodwin notes is “within the margin of error.” Separate polling shows a gap of just one point. When voters are asked who they would prefer to be running the country post-election, Farage and Reform outpace Sunak’s party.

Over a quarter of the Conservatives’ 2019 voters have switched to Reform, and one in three Brexit voters. When specific demographics are considered, Farage is preferred to Sunak among the Conservatives’ 2019 voters, Brexit voters, working-class voters, Northern English voters, and men.

Farage has outlined a plan to take over the Conservatives post-election by outcompeting them, forcing a merger between the dying right-establishment party. He cites the example of former Canadian premier Stephen Harper’s Reform Party, which absorbed the establishment Progressive Conservative Party into a new formation after rendering it electorally unviable.

HOLLOW SUPPORT. 

Despite being on course to win an unprecedented parliamentary super-majority, Goodwin’s research suggests the Labour Party’s support is still relatively soft.

The leftist party ranks first overall in terms of who voters want to see running the country after the election, but its support stands at just 22 percent, behind ‘None of the Above.’

The July election will be the first British general election in which photographic identification will be required for in-person voting. However, mail-in voting on demand remains in place, leaving the system vulnerable.

show less
Just one in three Brexit voters intend to vote for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Conservative (Tory) Party in the July 4 snap election. Poll data also shows only 47 percent of the governing party's 2019 voters intend to vote for them again. show more

Data Reveals New York Times ‘Bestseller List’ is EXTREMELY Partisan.

A study by The Economist has found that The New York Times‘s bestseller book list is biased against conservative authors. The study found that books authored by conservatives were at least seven percent less likely to make the newspaper’s weekly bestseller list. However, the analysis excluded household right-wing names in nonfiction like Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck, who have generally made the list—meaning less known names in conservative political publishing are most impacted.

The study also found that conservative books that make the bestseller list “…rank 2.3 notches lower on the nonfiction list, on average, than those published by other presses with similar sales… .” Low-volume conservative publishers—whose books sell less than 5,000 copies a week—were found to have a much less likely chance of having titles make the list than non-conservative publishers.

In 2017, conservative publisher Regnery stopped communicating its sales data with the New York Times after finding it editorialized its list in order to exclude conservative authors Dinesh D’Souza and Raheem Kassam (the latter now the Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse).

Responding to the study, The New York Times disputed the allegations of bias. “The political views of authors or their publishers have absolutely no bearing on our rankings and are not a factor in how books are ranked on the lists,” the newspaper said. It added: “There are a number of organizations with bestseller lists, each with different methodologies, so it is normal to see different rankings on each.”

Screenshot
show less
A study by The Economist has found that The New York Times's bestseller book list is biased against conservative authors. The study found that books authored by conservatives were at least seven percent less likely to make the newspaper's weekly bestseller list. However, the analysis excluded household right-wing names in nonfiction like Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck, who have generally made the list—meaning less known names in conservative political publishing are most impacted. show more

Biden’s DHS Released ISIS-Linked Migrant into U.S. After They Crossed The Southern Border.

A Tajikistani migrant connected to the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group was released into the United States by Joe Biden‘s Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The individual is among a group of foreign nationals apprehended in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and New York City during a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) anti-terrorism operation.

The Tajik migrant entered the U.S. through the southern border and is believed to have been vetted by federal law enforcement. Initial screenings did not reveal ties between the Tajik migrant and ISIS. They were subsequently released into the U.S. interior and assigned a court date in 2025 to appear before a federal immigration judge. However, subsequent investigations raised concerns, prompting action by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Unchecked flows of illegal migrants at the U.S. southern border continue to pose a national security threat, with the Tajik ISIS affiliate being only the latest terrorist to gain entry to the country. The National Pulse previously reported that a known member of the Somali terrorist group al Shabaab was able to reside in the U.S. for almost a year due to an error by federal agencies.

In another concerning border security breach, an allegedly “demobilized” member of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)—a communist-aligned terror group—was apprehended in Texas this past March. The Biden government twice released Mohammad Kharwin, an Afghan national associated with the Hezb-e-Islami group, into the U.S. interior after he initially crossed the border earlier in March 2023.

Since Fiscal Year 2021, almost 400 individuals on the Terrorist Watch List have been apprehended at the border trying to enter the U.S.

show less
A Tajikistani migrant connected to the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group was released into the United States by Joe Biden's Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The individual is among a group of foreign nationals apprehended in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and New York City during a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) anti-terrorism operation. show more

WATCH: Most ‘Biden Jobs’ Are Being Taken by Illegals as Regime Rewards ‘Illegality and Criminality.’

Most of the jobs created under Joe Biden “are not jobs for American workers,” according to Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse. “These are not jobs for either the native nor the legal migrant,” he told Turning Points USA founder Charlie Kirk.

Kassam says the public “rightly are sick of” of this “rewarding of illegality, rewarding of criminality” by the Biden regime, which may explain why the incumbent rates so poorly on the economy in polls, despite the corporate media insisting it is growing well.

The National Pulse has previously reported research by Steve Englander, head of macro at Standard Chartered, estimating that “undocumented [sic] immigrants account for half of job growth in FY24 so far.”

Even this may have been an underestimate, however, with research by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), covered by The National Pulse in February, finding Biden‘s vaunted “jobs recovery” is driven almost entirely by illegal immigrants.

Kassam has explained how this is possible before, noting that illegal immigrants are still able to take jobs if they are issued so-called employment authorization documents by the Biden regime. These enable them to work while they await their day in immigration court.

This is often set for years from the date they first encounter U.S. border officials, and hundreds of thousands have been granted a stealth amnesty as a result of the federal government terminating their asylum cases without any decision on their right to asylum being taken.

show less
Most of the jobs created under Joe Biden "are not jobs for American workers," according to Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse. "These are not jobs for either the native nor the legal migrant," he told Turning Points USA founder Charlie Kirk. show more

Is Elon Musk Getting Me Too’d?

The Wall Street Journal has published an article attempting to ‘Me Too’ the South African tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently denounced Donald Trump’s sham conviction in Manhattan as politically motivated.

The WSJ claims it spoke to “more than four dozen people, including former employees, people familiar with Musk’s interactions with female subordinates and friends and family of the women” involved in its story. However, it could only produce three new “victims,” at least one of whom wanted no part in the “scoop.”

The newspaper described the first “victim” as a SpaceX intern turned executive team member who had a consensual sexual relationship with Musk. The report concedes “she broke off the relationship with Musk [and] they remained friends.”

The WSJ appears to have relied on “friends” of the former employee to produce her story, despite admitting she “told friends not to speak with Journal reporters and later said that she didn’t want to be part of an article, following outreach from the Journal.”

A second supposed victim “alleged that Musk had asked her on multiple occasions to have his babies” during severance negotiations, after he had “denied [her] a raise and complained about her performance.”

The third supposed victim, like the former intern who did not want to be part of the WSJ story, had a consensual sexual relationship with Musk. However, months later was “telling her friends that she felt used” because she wanted “more than drinks at his house and sex.”

Musk, who was going through a messy divorce at the time of their tryst, said she “insisted on coming to my house to sleep with me when I was just sad and tired and wanted to be alone.” She is also alleged to have had an affair with an executive’s husband.

show less
The Wall Street Journal has published an article attempting to 'Me Too' the South African tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently denounced Donald Trump's sham conviction in Manhattan as politically motivated. show more