Rep. Josh Schriver, a Republican lawmaker from Michigan, was removed from his committee assignment and had his staff placed under oversight after retweeting a post on X, formerly Twitter, by Jack Posbiec, which opponents claim is ‘racist.’
The post featured an image of a world map where black figures vastly outnumber white, accompanied by the phrase, “The great replacement!”
Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate, a Black Democrat, said he would not allow the House to be a forum for “racist, hateful and bigoted speech.” However, Tate did not explain or elaborate as to how the post in question was actually racist, hateful, or bigoted.
The so-called “Great Replacement theory” posits that there is an intentional effort to replace whites in their homelands with non-white immigrants. Given that whites make up less than 25 percent of the global population and the vast majority of migration into ‘white’ countries — which has been encouraged by Western leaders — comes from non-white nations, the ‘theory’ is broadly speaking true.
Last month, an analysis by the Collage Group found that non-white Americans will be the majority in the United States by 2050. In 2023, a BBC survey found that a third of Britons believe that replacement ‘theory’ is true.
show less
Rep. Josh Schriver, a Republican lawmaker from Michigan, was removed from his committee assignment and had his staff placed under oversight after retweeting a post on X, formerly Twitter, by Jack Posbiec, which opponents claim is 'racist.'
show more
An estimated 123.4 million viewers tuned into this year’s Super Bowl, marking it as the most-watched broadcast since the historic Apollo 11 Moon landing in 1969. The Kansas City Chiefs claimed victory against the San Francisco 49ers with a nail-biting overtime score of 25-22. Notably, pop star Taylor Swift‘s attendance, who is in a relationship with the Chiefs’ Travis Kelce, may have boosted viewership.
The consumer research firm Numerator reported that approximately 20 percent of viewers were rooting for the Chiefs, with some of that number potentially drawn in by Swift‘s relationship with Kelce. Capitalizing on the star power of Swift, the Super Bowl broadcast featured several shots of the pop star at the event socializing with celebrities such as actress Blake Lively and rapper Ice Spice — as well as a celebratory post-match kiss with Kelce. CBS dominated the telecast, with 112 million of the 123.4 million viewers.
In addition, this year witnessed a record with 202.4 million people watching at least part of the game, according to Nielsen data. The spike is likely due to a change in Nielsen’s methodology – which now includes those watching in a gathering or outside their homes. A combination of Taylor Swift’s star power, the returning Super Bowl champion Chiefs, the San Francisco 49ers led by upstart quarterback Brock Purdy, and the nostalgia of Usher’s half-time show all likely contributed to the NFL’s ratings success on Sunday.
show less
An estimated 123.4 million viewers tuned into this year's Super Bowl, marking it as the most-watched broadcast since the historic Apollo 11 Moon landing in 1969. The Kansas City Chiefs claimed victory against the San Francisco 49ers with a nail-biting overtime score of 25-22. Notably, pop star Taylor Swift's attendance, who is in a relationship with the Chiefs' Travis Kelce, may have boosted viewership.
show more
Paramount Global, CBS’s parent company, is planning to lay off approximately 800 employees, a 3 percent reduction in its global workforce. This announcement comes just days after CBS’s broadcast of Super Bowl LVIII set a record as the most-watched TV program in history, drawing an average of 123.4 million viewers across television and streaming platforms on Sunday. Employees were informed of the job cuts on Tuesday, and CEO Bob Bakish acknowledged the difficulty of the decision, thanking departing staff for their contributions to the company.
The company, which owns entertainment franchises such as Paramount Pictures, TV networks Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelodeon, Britain’s Channel 5, and streaming platforms Paramount+ and Pluto TV, did not respond to requests for comment on the job cuts. According to a regulatory filing, Paramount Global employed approximately 24,500 full-time and part-time employees across 37 countries and more than 5,800 project-based staff at the end of 2022.
The move aligns with the company’s stated focus on its most globally successful franchises, such as Top Gun, Mission: Impossible, and the hit television series Yellowstone, and less emphasis on local originals. CEO Bob Bakish concluded in an internal memo, “These adjustments will help enable us to build on our momentum and execute our strategic vision for the year ahead – and I firmly believe we have much to be excited about.” The company further declined to provide additional comments on the layoffs.
show less
Paramount Global, CBS's parent company, is planning to lay off approximately 800 employees, a 3 percent reduction in its global workforce. This announcement comes just days after CBS's broadcast of Super Bowl LVIII set a record as the most-watched TV program in history, drawing an average of 123.4 million viewers across television and streaming platforms on Sunday. Employees were informed of the job cuts on Tuesday, and CEO Bob Bakish acknowledged the difficulty of the decision, thanking departing staff for their contributions to the company.
show more
Proponents of the $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine in the House of Representatives are exploring using the little-used “discharge petition” mechanism to force a floor vote on a Senate bill that passed early Tuesday morning.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) vowed to ignore the Senate measure, but a floor vote would automatically occur if 218 House members signed the so-called discharge petition. While using discharge petitions in the House is rare — and rarely successful — the legislative maneuver is the most likely path for the Ukraine aid bill to receive a floor vote.
How It Might Work.
The first step in setting up a discharge petition showdown in the House will begin once Speaker Johnson refers the Senate-passed Ukraine funding bill to a relevant committee of jurisdiction. The assigned committee can sit on the bill for 30 days before proponents of the legislation can file their petition. To force the bill out of committee and onto the floor for an up-or-down vote, proponents will need to secure 218 signatures in favor of discharging the legislation.
House Democrats have an active discharge petition with 213 signatures — first circulated during the debt limit fight last year. If Democrats moved to use this petition for the Ukraine funding bill, they’d likely lose a handful of progressive signatories over the legislation’s aid earmarked for Israel but almost certainly pick up some RINO-Republican votes.
No Guarantees.
With 200 or so Democrat signatories, the next step will be to gain signatures among Republicans in support of the Ukraine funding. Amassing signatories from the majority is easier said than done. Previous discharge petitions have failed at this stage as Members of Congress in the majority are loathe to break ranks — especially if they believe they’ll be punished by leadership.
However, whether the Ukraine funding bill is held up in committee or held from the floor by Speaker Johnson, an attempt at forcing a vote via discharge petition appears likely. If Ukraine funding proponents can gain 218 signatories, not even Speaker Johnson can prevent a floor vote on the $95 billion Ukraine funding bill.
The last time a discharge petition was successful was in 2015, when proponents of the Ex-Im Bank forced a floor vote on its reauthorization.
show less
Proponents of the $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine in the House of Representatives are exploring using the little-used “discharge petition” mechanism to force a floor vote on a Senate bill that passed early Tuesday morning.
show more
Biden family associate Anthony Bobulinksi will testify before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability as well as the Committee on the Judiciary on Tuesday. Bobulinksi is expected to explain how he once worked with both Joe and Hunter Biden, and how the pair willfully allowed the Obama administration to be infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party in exchange for cash.
“The Chinese Communist Party through its surrogate, China Energy Company Limited, or “CEFC” – a CCP-linked Chinese energy conglomerate – successfully sought to infiltrate and compromise Joe Biden and the Obama-Biden White House,” Bobulinski will explain, in testimony reviewed by The National Pulse.
“It is also not a coincidence that CEFC used the Biden family’s weakest link, Hunter Biden, and the promise of large sums of money to the tune of tens of millions of dollars initially, and eventually the profits from investing billions of dollars in the United States and around the world,” he adds.
The full, expected statement, follows below:
Chairmen, Ranking Members, and Members of Congress,
Thank you for this opportunity to speak with you.I am happy that the American people will finally hear the facts and evidence that I have been trying to outline for over four years, all backed up and supported by emails, texts, documents, records, pictures, and other evidence.The facts we are going to discuss today are important for America’s national security, and I can only hope that everyone in this room and all representatives and officers of the U.S. Government take them seriously.
My name is Tony Bobulinski.I am a proud American citizen who has honorably served the United States in several capacities.For over six years, I was an officer in the United States Navy’s elite Naval Nuclear Power Training Command as a decorated Master Training Specialist Instructor.I later served as the Command’s Chief Technology Officer, where I held a Q security clearance from the Department of Energy and from the National Security Agency.When I left NNPTC, I was the number-one-ranked Direct Input Officer (DIO) in the entire command in my final Navy Fitness Report, or FITREP.
I am here today out of duty to God and country in a nonpartisan manner with only one party in mind, the party I served with honor and gratitude: the United States of America.While I have made a few campaign contributions over the years to Democrats such as Congressman Ro Khanna, a member of the Oversight Committee, I am not a political person.I come from a family with a long history of distinguished service in our nation’s military.I grew up the son of a career Naval Officer, CDR Robert Bobulinski, whom I loved dearly.I could not be prouder of my father’s long and distinguished service to our great nation.His father, Alex Bobulinski, served our country in the Air Force for four years.I am also the grandson of Army Intelligence Officer, Col. Fred B. Keller Jr., who, for more than thirty-seven years, fearlessly defended the United States all over the world and served in three different wars.My only brother, retired CDR Mike Bobulinski, is a twenty-eight year combat-serving Naval Flight Officer, and my only sister, Stacia Bobulinski, has spent the last eighteen years serving U.S. military veterans across the country through the Veterans Administration to demonstrate her and our family’s gratitude to everyone who has risked their lives defending America.
I share my extensive U.S. military roots and background with you because they are the lens through which I view this exceptional country and my responsibility to it.My deep commitment to America is also the reason I have elected to place myself and my family in the public eye to tell the truth before you today.That comes at a great cost to my privacy and to my personal security and that of my family, among other things.However, I am happy to pay that cost.I am blessed to have been born and to grow up in the greatest country on earth.I take that seriously.Having been to over fifty countries around the world, I say that with the highest confidence.
For nearly four years, I have tried to tell the American people the truth about serious corruption at the very top of their government.In return, I have been falsely accused of being a purveyor of “Russian disinformation” and a political surrogate.My continuous efforts to inform the American people of the facts have been actively suppressed by both the United States Government and the so-called “mainstream” media.
I want to be crystal clear: from my direct personal experience and what I have subsequently come to learn, it is clear to me that Joe Biden was “the Brand” being sold by the Biden family.His family’s foreign influence peddling operation – from China to Ukraine and elsewhere – sold out to foreign actors who were seeking to gain influence and access to Joe Biden and the United States government.Joe Biden was more than a participant in and beneficiary of his family’s business; he was an enabler, despite being buffered by a complex scheme to maintain plausible deniability.
The only reason any of these international business transactions took place – with tens of millions of dollars flowing directly to the Biden family – was because Joe Biden was in high office.The Biden family business was Joe Biden, period.Other key players have made this point clear as well: Hunter Biden himself has adamantly stated it in a variety of communications, as did another Biden family business associate, Devon Archer, in his testimony last year.Foreign nationals on the other side of these transactions – including from China, Ukraine and Romania – have also explained how and why these transactions took place.Once again, I would call that extensive evidence.
The Chinese Communist Party through its surrogate, China Energy Company Limited, or “CEFC” – a CCP-linked Chinese energy conglomerate – successfully sought to infiltrate and compromise Joe Biden and the Obama-Biden White House.This process started in the Fourth Quarter of 2015 and continued through when Joe Biden left office in January 2017 to March of 2018 when CEFC Chairman Ye was detained for corruption in China, never to be seen again.Note that on October 21, 2015, Joe Biden announced that he would not seek the Presidency in 2016.It is not a coincidence that CEFC’s aggressive approach to the Biden family happened around the same time.It is also not a coincidence that CEFC used the Biden family’s weakest link, Hunter Biden, and the promise of large sums of money to the tune of tens of millions of dollars initially, and eventually the profits from investing billions of dollars in the United States and around the world.
Before we begin this in-depth testimony under penalty of perjury and charges of Obstruction of Congress, I would like to highlight a few critically important facts:
Joe Biden was aware of the CEFC transaction, enabled it and had a constitutional responsibility and obligation to the American people to shut it down before it began.This is because CEFC had been identified as a known surrogate of the Chinese Communist Party by the U.S. Government and prosecutors in the Southern District of New York as far back as 2016, possibly earlier.I would encourage Congress to gather all of the exact facts and dates.It is clear to me that alarm bells should have been going off in the Obama-Biden White House and that Joe Biden should have been aware that his own administration had red-flagged CEFC as a tool of the Chinese Communist Party.This should have made any business transaction with CEFC a non-starter. I personally met with Joe Biden in Los Angeles in May of 2017 multiple times to discuss the broad contours of our business dealings.The only reason Joe Biden met with me privately during the Milken Institute Global Conference and seated me at his head table was because I was a business associate of the Biden family.
Joe Biden’s immediate family members were enriched to the tune of tens of millions of dollars from some of our most dangerous adversaries, including the Chinese Communist Party and players from Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Kazakhstan and other foreign nations and entities.It is my educated belief dating back to Q clearance briefings I received in the Navy and continuing through recent discussions with experts, that under U.S. corruption laws, political office holders can be held as responsible as the immediate family members who are receiving money directly.This makes common sense and Americans understand this.The facts we are going to discuss today appear to me to present disturbing evidence, which these committees should thoroughly investigate, with respect to possible violations by Joe Biden of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity statutes, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
The Biden family – Joe’s son Hunter and his brother Jim – knowingly and aggressively defrauded me as the CEO of SinoHawk Holdings and as a member of Oneida Holdings, LLC at the end of July 2017.They put Joe Biden and the rest of the Biden family smack in the middle of a $9 Billion transaction between Russia and China involving Qatar (specifically, the Qatar Investment Authority), and helped CEFC navigate through various issues before Patrick Ho, a CEFC executive, was arrested for corruption in New York in November 2017.Joe Biden’s status as the head of the family served an enforcement role – for example, when Hunter stated deliberately that his father Joe was sitting right next to him while demanding immediate payment of the $10 million CEFC had committed to the Biden family, as well as when Hunter demanded CEFC circumvent SinoHawk Holdings.The Biden family violated their fiduciary duties to SinoHawk and Oneida as they enriched themselves at the CEFC trough.
United States law enforcement appears to have been singularly unwilling to speak with me or to hear the facts we will be discussing today.I have never been contacted to provide testimony nor asked to speak with anyone connected with Joe Biden’s administration, including his Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, or local law enforcement.That includes U.S. Attorney David Weiss for the District of Delaware or any of the several grand juries I now know were convened after my name became publicly known.On October 23, 2020, I voluntarily walked into the Washington Field Office of the FBI with several phones containing years of encrypted communications between me and numerous members of the Biden family and their associates.That conversation, which was subject to False Statement statutes, lasted many hours, and was never followed up upon by anyone in government or law enforcement in any way.Rather, when the House Ways and Means Committee recently released the FBI 302 report of that meeting, Hunter Biden’s lawyers laughably tried to use a single note-taking error by a junior FBI agent to accuse me, falsely, of lying about my attendance at a meeting with Hunter Biden and CEFC in Miami.I was crystal clear to the agent in my interview that I was physically in Miami during that time for other things and did not attend the actual CEFC meeting.Hunter Biden’s lawyers should focus their energy on the facts and the extensive indictments Hunter is fighting versus creating smoke screens and distractions with their empty threats.I have only told the truth, I continue to tell the truth, I have the facts and, as we will discuss today, I also have the receipts to back them up.
I sit here before two of the premiere committees of Congress: Oversight and Judiciary.I implore each and every one of you to remove your partisan hats today and focus on one party: the United States of America.I hope your focus will be on a thorough and extensive investigation and exposure of all of the facts and evidence – and on answering the question of how we as a country allowed the White House to be infiltrated by our most existential adversary, the Chinese Communist Party.I also hope you will hold the complicit parties, including Joe Biden, accountable for their actions, as well as enact new laws that prevent this kind of deep corruption from ever happening again.
God Bless America.I am ready for your questions.
show less
Biden family associate Anthony Bobulinksi will testify before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability as well as the Committee on the Judiciary on Tuesday. Bobulinksi is expected to explain how he once worked with both Joe and Hunter Biden, and how the pair willfully allowed the Obama administration to be infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party in exchange for cash.
show more
The United States Senate approved a $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan early Tuesday morning, with all Democrats and 22 Republicans voting for it.
“With the strong bipartisan support we have here in the Senate, with this vote, I believe that if Speaker Johnson brought this bill to the House floor, it will pass with the same strong bipartisan support,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
However, the bill’s future in the House is uncertain, as Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La) has expressed his opposition to any foreign aid package without real measures to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.
“[In] the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate, the House will have to continue to work its own will on these important matters,” Johnson wrote in a statement released Monday night ahead of the Senate vote. “America deserves better than the Senate’s status quo.”
Former President Donald Trump opposed the bill, writing on Truth Social on Saturday: “NO MONEY IN THE FORM OF FOREIGN AID SHOULD BE GIVEN TO ANY COUNTRY UNLESS IT IS DONE AS A LOAN… WE SHOULD NEVER GIVE MONEY ANYMORE WITHOUT THE HOPE OF A PAYBACK, OR WITHOUT ‘STRINGS’ ATTACHED. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SHOULD BE ‘STUPID’ NO LONGER!”
Republican Senators who voted against the bill echoed these sentiments. “We must fix our country before devoting more resources to Ukraine. That’s our message, and the fight goes on,” said Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio).
On Monday, Vance issued a memo to his colleagues warning that the aid package in question contained a buried impeachmenttrigger that effectively makes it impossible for a future President to work for peace between Ukraine and Russia without being impeached.
show less
The United States Senate approved a $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan early Tuesday morning, with all Democrats and 22 Republicans voting for it.
show more
Projections suggest over 5,400 police officers were injured by suspects in New York City in 2023, as the Big Apple remains in the grip of a disorderlymigrant crisis.
The number of officers injured by suspects in 2022 stood at 4,724, a 20 percent increase on the 2021 figure of 3,933. Full figures for 2023 have not been released, but 4,077 officers had been injured after just nine months, with projections indicating the total for the year would have been around 5,436.
“Well over 5,000 cops were attacked and injured last year — that’s not only a record, it’s a full-blown epidemic,” said Patrick Hendry, President of the Police Benevolent Association.
“The vicious attacks on police officers we’ve seen recently didn’t come out of nowhere. This dangerous environment has been building for years,” he continued. “It’s not going to get better until those who attack police officers are consistently prosecuted and kept in jail. And that won’t happen unless New Yorkers keep speaking up to demand an end to the chaos.”
News of the new statistics follows a high-profile attack on two police officers by a migrant gang in Times Square. Four suspects in the incident, which saw the officers repeatedly kicked in the head while on the ground, were arrested shortly afterward, and another the following day.
All turned out to be asylum seekers, and four of them were released without bail within hours of their detention, thanks to Democrat reforms. Most of them promptly absconded, sparking a nationwide manhunt.
NEW: Migrant mob beats NYPD officers near Times Square, released days later without bail according to the New York Post.
It's almost as if New York City is *encouraging* people to beat up their officers.
Projections suggest over 5,400 police officers were injured by suspects in New York City in 2023, as the Big Apple remains in the grip of a disorderly migrant crisis.
show more
Nearly 9 out of 10 Americans — 86 percent — believe that Joe Biden is too old to serve another term as President, according to a recent ABC News/Ipsos poll. Although 59 percent of those polled believed that both Biden and former President Donald Trump are too old to serve as President, more than a quarter — 27 percent — believed that just Biden is too old compared to only 3 percent who felt the same way about Trump.
The poll comes amidst increasing concerns about Biden’s mental state and cognitive abilities following a series of gaffes and a damning report by special counsel Robert Hur regarding the current President’s mishandling of classified documents. Hur, who decided not to prosecute Biden, described him as an “elderly man with a poor memory” and revealed that he could not remember when his son Beau died or when his terms as Vice President began or ended.
Earlier this month, Biden also claimed to have met with French President François Mitterrand of France, who died in 1996, at the G7 Summit. Days later, he claimed to have spoken with German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who died in 2017, at the same summit. Immediately following the release of Hur’s report, Biden confused the Mexican and Egyptian presidents.
show less
Nearly 9 out of 10 Americans — 86 percent — believe that Joe Biden is too old to serve another term as President, according to a recent ABC News/Ipsos poll. Although 59 percent of those polled believed that both Biden and former President Donald Trump are too old to serve as President, more than a quarter — 27 percent — believed that just Biden is too old compared to only 3 percent who felt the same way about Trump.
show more
Actor and comedian Micahel Rapaport – a frequent, aggressive critic of former President Donald Trump – is now admitting he was wrong about Trump’s “fine people” remarks regarding the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The 2017 demonstrations against the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee from a city park turned violent as protestors clashed, resulting in the death of a counter-demonstrator.
During a recent appearance on the PBD Podcast, Rapaport was pressed on whether media exaggerations regarding Trump had misled him and distorted his views of the former President. The actor and comedian admitted this was the case.
“That one thing, about Charlottesville, that I ranted about… I was wrong,” said Rapaport, explaining the media’s lack of context regarding Trump’s quote had misled him: “You know, he said ‘There’s good people on both sides’ and when you see the full quote, that wasn’t what he said.” Given the misleading reports, Rapaport went on to lament his rant against Trump.
What Trump Actually Said.
In the aftermath of Charlottesville, former President Trump repeatedly condemned the “egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence” that occurred during the demonstration. After being continually pressed by the media to condemn only the pro-Robert E. Lee statue demonstrators in the days following the violent protests, Trump responded: “You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides… You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”
The media was quick to spin the President’s remarks as a defense of not the peaceful protestors defending the Lee statue but of the extremist groups that joined the demonstrations. Left out of media reports were Trump’s words calling these groups and individuals “very bad people” and his repeated condemnation of their actions over the days prior.
In recent weeks, Rapaport has suggested he is open to voting for President Trump in November, reiterating his stance on the PBD Podcast.
WATCH:
show less
Actor and comedian Micahel Rapaport – a frequent, aggressive critic of former President Donald Trump – is now admitting he was wrong about Trump's "fine people" remarks regarding the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The 2017 demonstrations against the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee from a city park turned violent as protestors clashed, resulting in the death of a counter-demonstrator.
show more
The perpetrator of an attempted mass shooting at Lakewood Church in Houston, TX on Sunday appears to be a pro-“Palestine”, transgender migrant. The shooter, identified as “female” Genesee Moreno, hailed from El Salvador but also went by the name “Jeffrey.” Reports indicate Moreno scrawled “Free Palestine” on his/her weapon and targeted the church for Pastor Joel Osteen’s pro-Israel views.
Shortly before 2 p.m. on Sunday, Moreno entered Osteen’s megachurch with a rifle and child in tow and opened fire. She injured one churchgoer before law enforcement officers intervened. Moreno was killed at the scene. The child she brought with her was injured in the gunfire.
Osteen is an outspoken Christian Zionist. He has expressed strong public support for Israel and its President, Benjamin Netanyahu, and interviewed the Israeli politician last year for his Sirius XM radio show.
Moreno is the latest in a string of transgender individuals involved in mass shootings.
On January 4, 17-year-old Dylan Butler, who appeared to identify as transgender, opened fire at Perry High School in Perry, Iowa. Five students and three staff members were shot. Two died. On March 23, 2023, transgender Audrey Hale opened fire at The Covenant School, a Presbyterian elementary school, in Nashville, TN. Six people died. In November 2022, Anderson Lee Aldrich, who identified as non-binary, killed five people at an LGBTQ nightclub in Colorado Springs, Colorado. In May 2019, transgender teenager Alec McKinney killed one person after opening fire in STEM School Highlands Ranch in Highlands Ranch, Colorado.
🚨 BREAKING: Lakewood Church shooter identified as a transgender, legal name Genesse Moreno but went by the name “Jeffrey.” 🚨 pic.twitter.com/0gmgybgOLC
The perpetrator of an attempted mass shooting at Lakewood Church in Houston, TX on Sunday appears to be a pro-"Palestine", transgender migrant. The shooter, identified as "female" Genesee Moreno, hailed from El Salvador but also went by the name "Jeffrey." Reports indicate Moreno scrawled "Free Palestine" on his/her weapon and targeted the church for Pastor Joel Osteen's pro-Israel views.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
