Monday, September 22, 2025

Britain Could Run Out of Tea.

British retailer Sainsbury’s has warned customers about potential shortages of black tea due to continuing disruptions to international trade routes. Signs posted in certain Sainsbury’s locations announced, “We are experiencing supply issues affecting the nationwide supply of black tea. We apologize for any inconvenience and hope to be back in full supply soon.” Despite this, retail executives were quick to reassure customers that the impact will hopefully be minimal and only temporary.

While Sainsbury’s declined to provide further comment, it’s understood that the complications are tied to Houthi rebel attacks on shipping vessels in the Red Sea and related delays with a tea supplier. Andrew Opie, director of food and sustainability at the British Retail Consortium, stated, “There is temporary disruption to some black tea lines, but the impact on consumers will be minimal as retailers are not expecting significant challenges.”

While the interruption in the tea supply is significant, the other supermarkets contacted about the situation, including Waitrose, did not report any similar issues. It’s been noted that freight shipments from Asia and East Africa, areas that make up about 75 percent of global tea production, have faced significant disruption in the last two months due to unrest in the Red Sea. The increased violence in the area has forced many shipping companies to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope, leading to 10 to 14 additional days in shipment times and increased costs for shipping firms.

show less
British retailer Sainsbury's has warned customers about potential shortages of black tea due to continuing disruptions to international trade routes. Signs posted in certain Sainsbury's locations announced, “We are experiencing supply issues affecting the nationwide supply of black tea. We apologize for any inconvenience and hope to be back in full supply soon." Despite this, retail executives were quick to reassure customers that the impact will hopefully be minimal and only temporary. show more

This Little-Used Congressional Mechanism Could Help Ukraine-Firsters Fast Track Cash to Zelensky.

Proponents of the $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine in the House of Representatives are exploring using the little-used “discharge petition” mechanism to force a floor vote on a Senate bill that passed early Tuesday morning.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) vowed to ignore the Senate measure, but a floor vote would automatically occur if 218 House members signed the so-called discharge petition. While using discharge petitions in the House is rare — and rarely successful — the legislative maneuver is the most likely path for the Ukraine aid bill to receive a floor vote.

How It Might Work.

The first step in setting up a discharge petition showdown in the House will begin once Speaker Johnson refers the Senate-passed Ukraine funding bill to a relevant committee of jurisdiction. The assigned committee can sit on the bill for 30 days before proponents of the legislation can file their petition. To force the bill out of committee and onto the floor for an up-or-down vote, proponents will need to secure 218 signatures in favor of discharging the legislation.

House Democrats have an active discharge petition with 213 signatures — first circulated during the debt limit fight last year. If Democrats moved to use this petition for the Ukraine funding bill, they’d likely lose a handful of progressive signatories over the legislation’s aid earmarked for Israel but almost certainly pick up some RINO-Republican votes.

No Guarantees.

With 200 or so Democrat signatories, the next step will be to gain signatures among Republicans in support of the Ukraine funding. Amassing signatories from the majority is easier said than done. Previous discharge petitions have failed at this stage as Members of Congress in the majority are loathe to break ranks — especially if they believe they’ll be punished by leadership.

However, whether the Ukraine funding bill is held up in committee or held from the floor by Speaker Johnson, an attempt at forcing a vote via discharge petition appears likely. If Ukraine funding proponents can gain 218 signatories, not even Speaker Johnson can prevent a floor vote on the $95 billion Ukraine funding bill.

The last time a discharge petition was successful was in 2015, when proponents of the Ex-Im Bank forced a floor vote on its reauthorization.

show less
Proponents of the $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine in the House of Representatives are exploring using the little-used “discharge petition” mechanism to force a floor vote on a Senate bill that passed early Tuesday morning. show more

Senate Passes $95B ‘America Last’ War Package for Ukraine, Israel, & Taiwan.

The United States Senate approved a $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan early Tuesday morning, with all Democrats and 22 Republicans voting for it.

“With the strong bipartisan support we have here in the Senate, with this vote, I believe that if Speaker Johnson brought this bill to the House floor, it will pass with the same strong bipartisan support,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

However, the bill’s future in the House is uncertain, as Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La) has expressed his opposition to any foreign aid package without real measures to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.

“[In] the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate, the House will have to continue to work its own will on these important matters,” Johnson wrote in a statement released Monday night ahead of the Senate vote. “America deserves better than the Senate’s status quo.”

Former President Donald Trump opposed the bill, writing on Truth Social on Saturday: “NO MONEY IN THE FORM OF FOREIGN AID SHOULD BE GIVEN TO ANY COUNTRY UNLESS IT IS DONE AS A LOAN… WE SHOULD NEVER GIVE MONEY ANYMORE WITHOUT THE HOPE OF A PAYBACK, OR WITHOUT ‘STRINGS’ ATTACHED. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SHOULD BE ‘STUPID’ NO LONGER!”

Republican Senators who voted against the bill echoed these sentiments. “We must fix our country before devoting more resources to Ukraine. That’s our message, and the fight goes on,” said Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio).

On Monday, Vance issued a memo to his colleagues warning that the aid package in question contained a buried impeachment trigger that effectively makes it impossible for a future President to work for peace between Ukraine and Russia without being impeached.

show less
The United States Senate approved a $95 billion ‘aid’ package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan early Tuesday morning, with all Democrats and 22 Republicans voting for it. show more

Ukraine Funding Bill Tries to Make Peace Illegal.

Provisions buried in the Ukraine supplemental funding bill would make it nearly impossible for a future president to pursue a peaceful resolution to the conflict without facing impeachment from Congress. U.S. Senator J.D. Vance is raising the alarm regarding the legislative text and its implications for a future Trump presidency should Trump pursue peace between Ukraine and Russia.

In a memo to colleagues, Vance warns of a buried impeachment trigger using the same obscure budget laws Democrats cited during President Trump’s 2019 impeachment. Contained in the supplemental funding bill, Vance notes, are appropriations totaling $1.6 billion for foreign military financing and $13.7 billion for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative — both budgeted into 2025. This would extend the funding into the first term of a possible second Trump administration. Should a future President Trump move to pause these funds to allow for a peace process to move forward, it could trigger a similar impeachment scenario Trump faced in 2019.

In 2019, the Republican President was accused by Congressional Democrats of ‘abuse of power’ and ‘obstruction of Congress’ for withholding aid that had been earmarked to be sent to Ukraine. Democrats argued former President Trump contravened the opinions of “career experts” — and the Impoundment Control Act — to pressure Ukraine’s political leadership to divulge information regarding their dealings with Joe Biden when he served as vice president. While the Democrats were successful in impeaching Trump in the House, the Senate declined to convict Trump.

Should former President Trump retake the White House and, as promised, pursue an end to the conflict in Eastern Europe, the cost of peace may very well be another attempt by Congressional Democrats to impeach him. “The supplemental represents an attempt by the foreign policy blob/deep state to stop President Trump from pursuing his desired policy, and if he does so anyways, to provide grounds to impeach him and undermine his administration,” Vance argues in his memo to colleagues, adding: “All Republicans should oppose its passage.”

show less
Provisions buried in the Ukraine supplemental funding bill would make it nearly impossible for a future president to pursue a peaceful resolution to the conflict without facing impeachment from Congress. U.S. Senator J.D. Vance is raising the alarm regarding the legislative text and its implications for a future Trump presidency should Trump pursue peace between Ukraine and Russia. show more

Trump Triggers Globalists… By Suggesting NATO Have MORE Resources!?

President Donald Trump has once again attracted the ire of globalists for daring to suggest this weekend that NATO member nations that are delinquent in their payments to the alliance should not get protection from the United States. Trump’s comments came during a campaign rally in South Carolina on Saturday.

“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well, sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’” Trump said. “I said, ‘You didn’t pay. You’re delinquent.’ He said, ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.”

Trump has been a long-standing critic of NATO and, as President, worked to ensure that NATO members spent the 2 percent of GDP on defense required by membership in the organization. According to 2023 data, 19 of the 30 members of NATO are spending less than that.

“Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the U.S. and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk,” NATO Secretary General Jans Stoltenberg said in a written response. “I expect that regardless of who wins the presidential election, the U.S. will remain a strong and committed NATO ally.”

“Reckless statements on NATO’s security and Art 5 solidarity serve only Putin’s interest. They do not bring more security or peace to the world,” said Charles Michel, President of the European Council, in a statement on social media.

Some European leaders were less concerned, however. “I am not paid to be worried,” said Latvian President Edgars Rinkevics. “Europe must spend more on defense, on capabilities and ramp-up defense production regardless who wins in the U.S. It is in our vital interest.” Latvia is one of the few NATO members meeting its spending requirements.

show less
President Donald Trump has once again attracted the ire of globalists for daring to suggest this weekend that NATO member nations that are delinquent in their payments to the alliance should not get protection from the United States. Trump’s comments came during a campaign rally in South Carolina on Saturday. show more

Kiev Protestors Call For Ouster Of Zelensky.

Protestors gathered in Kiev’s Independence Square on Friday, chanting slogans in support of General Valery Zaluzhny, who was removed as Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces by President Volodymyr Zelensky this week. They also called for the ouster of Zelesnky himself and Zaluzhny’s replacement, General Oleksandr Syrskyi.

The small number of protestors indicate that at least some Ukrainians are tired of the protracted war and their political leadership’s desire to send more Ukrainian men to the front lines. General Syrskyi’s insistence on holding the city of Bakhmut for nine months cost the lives of 20,000 Ukrainian soldiers, according to Western government estimates.

Another point of contention with those dissatisfied with the change in military leadership revolves around strategy. Whereas General Zaluzhny emphasized a strategic and flexible defense — focused on preventing Russian breakthroughs, General Syrskyi has committed to boosting troop numbers on the front lines and a more aggressive stance to push Russian troops out of Ukrainian territory.

The broader reaction on the streets of Kiev has been one of cautious skepticism, according to the Associated Press, which conducted a series of interviews with residents in the Ukrainian capital. “We hope that our government has not made a big mistake,” 35-year-old Alisa Riazantseva told the wire service, adding that she had been “generally satisfied” with the leadership of General Zaluzhny. Other residents echoed Riazantseva’s sentiments.

show less
Protestors gathered in Kiev's Independence Square on Friday, chanting slogans in support of General Valery Zaluzhny, who was removed as Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces by President Volodymyr Zelensky this week. They also called for the ouster of Zelesnky himself and Zaluzhny's replacement, General Oleksandr Syrskyi. show more

Boris Johnson Calls Tucker Carlson a ‘Slack-Jawed Traitor to Journalism’ for Putin Interview.

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson – who reportedly scuppered a Russia-Ukraine peace deal 18 months ago – has used his Daily Mail column to brand journalist and Putin interviewer Tucker Carlson a “traitor to journalism,” accusing him of bum-sucking servility to a tyrant.”

Johnson, who was ousted as Prime Minister due to a number of corruption scandals involving his Clinton-linked wife, Carrie Symonds, recently took on a role at the increasingly liberal-leaning GB News channel in the United Kingdom.

“He was just the medium, the sewer, the hose by which the untreated slurry of Putin’s message could be sprayed where Putin wants it most — over the fertile heartlands of America,” wrote Johnson in an angry screed on Friday.

Johnson scarcely denied the assertions made by both Vladimir Putin and pro-Ukraine globalist Fiona Hill, that he was the cause of the prolonged war, simply referring to the allegation as “ludicrous” and insisting, “nothing and no one could have stopped those lion-hearted Ukrainians from fighting for their country — and nothing will.”

His op-ed concludes with an appeal to President Trump, stating: “I hope and believe that if President Trump is elected again he will confound his critics, turn his party [a]round and complete the work that he began when he became the first U.S. President to give arms to the Ukrainians.”

Trump indeed sold Javelin missiles to Ukraine, rather than demanding the American taxpayer fund the nation’s military. In return, globalists and Ukraine-firsters such as Lt. Col. Alex Vindman attempted to have Trump impeached.

show less

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson – who reportedly scuppered a Russia-Ukraine peace deal 18 months ago – has used his Daily Mail column to brand journalist and Putin interviewer Tucker Carlson a “traitor to journalism,” accusing him of bum-sucking servility to a tyrant.”

show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
It’s not the first time Boris and Tucker have butted heads, with the globalist former PM once trashing the then-Fox anchor to a room full of chuckling D
It’s not the first time Boris and Tucker have butted heads, with the globalist former PM once trashing the then-Fox anchor to a room full of chuckling D show more
for exclusive members-only insights

Putin ‘Is Not Good at Explaining Himself’ Says Tucker in Post-Interview Analysis.

Tucker Carlson has offered his reflections on his interview with Vladimir Putin, suggesting the Russian leader is “smart” but struggled to present his case coherently.

Recording his thoughts in the immediate aftermath of the interview in a Kremlin anteroom, Carlson expressed surprise at Putin having “launched into an extremely detailed history going back to the 9th century” when he asked the Russian leader why he had invaded Ukraine, adding that it had “annoyed” him.

Speaking in his hotel room later the same night, Carlson offered further reflections, saying the Russian was “not good at explaining himself.”

“He’s smart, there’s no question about that, but he’s clearly spending a lot of time in a world where he doesn’t have to explain himself,” Carlson said.

“He didn’t lay out his case very coherently, though if you listen carefully… a couple of things rose to the surface,” he said, referring to Putin’s stance on post Cold War Russo-U.S. relations.

Carlson said it was his own view that Russia “is not an expansionist power,” not least because it needs no additional natural resources and is already “too big already” for its population.

Carlson also expressed some surprise that Putin “was willing to admit that he wants a peace deal in Ukraine, and sort of give it away.”

“Maybe he’s lying in ways I didn’t perceive, but he kept saying it, and I don’t know why he would say it if he didn’t mean it. And of course, there is, as a matter of fact, evidence overwhelming that there was a peace deal… that the former Prime Minister of Great Britain, Boris Johnson, scuttled on behalf of the Biden administration,” Carlson recalled.

show less
Tucker Carlson has offered his reflections on his interview with Vladimir Putin, suggesting the Russian leader is "smart" but struggled to present his case coherently. show more

Putin Confirms Globalist Boris Johnson Scuppered Peace Talks.

In a two-hour exclusive interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, President Vladimir Putin confirmed reporting by The National Pulse’s Raheem Kassam that an agreement to end the war with Ukraine was scuttled 18 months ago by former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Kassam wrote of the matter 17 months ago.

The Russian president alleged that Johnson dissuaded Davyd Arakhamia, leader of Ukraine’s ruling party, from signing the peace accord. Putin suggested the preliminary agreement had been reached in Istanbul after direct negotiations with Ukrainian officials.

Putin contended that although Mr. Arakhamia initially agreed to the document, pressure from the then UK Prime Minister led Ukraine to back off from the agreement. Putin said, “Arakhamia publicly stated to the world that we were ready to sign this document, but Mr. Johnson came and dissuaded us, saying it was better to fight Russia.” Putin also accused the US of instructing Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to reject any potential settlement.

The alleged peace deal, critical to halting the ongoing warfare, would have resulted in Ukraine abandoning its plans to join NATO in exchange for returning territories lost in clashes with Russia. These accusations have been categorically refuted by both Mr. Johnson and Mr. Arakhamia, raising further concerns over the protracted military conflict in the region.

show less
In a two-hour exclusive interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, President Vladimir Putin confirmed reporting by The National Pulse’s Raheem Kassam that an agreement to end the war with Ukraine was scuttled 18 months ago by former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Kassam wrote of the matter 17 months ago. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
Imagine if everyone in the world read The National Pulse and my Substack! Now stop imagining and help us make it happen! Gift someone a subscription today!Gift someone a subscription today!
Imagine if everyone in the world read The National Pulse and my Substack! Now stop imagining and help us make it happen! Gift someone a subscription today!Gift someone a subscription today! show more
for exclusive members-only insights

WATCH: The Only Good Thing to Come Out of The ‘Global War on Terror.’

In tribute to the late Toby Keith, who sadly left us this week.

Keith, just 62, was battling stomach cancer and had even recently said he hoped to return to entertain his fans soon.

You can play the video above to watch one performance, or listen (with no video, sadly) to what I think is the superior form, below.

THE EVEN BETTER VERSION:

LYRICS:

I’m just a middle-aged, middle-eastern camel herdin’ manAnd I got a little two-bedroom cave here in North AfghanistanThings used to be real nice and they got out of hand since they moved inThey call themselves the TalibanOoh, yeah, the TalibanSingin’, ooh, the Taliban, babyOh, yeah
Now I ain’t seen my wife’s face since they came hereThey make her wear a scarf over her head that covers her from ear to earShe loves the desert and the hot, white sandBut man, she’s just like me, nah, she can’t standThe Taliban (ooh, the Taliban, baby)
But you know, someday soon we’re both gonna saddle upAnd it’ll be, ride, camel, rideMy old lady, she’ll be here with me, just smilin’ right by my sideWe should do just fine out around Palestine or maybe TurkmenistanWe’ll bid a fair adieu and flip the finger to the Taliban
Now they attacked New York City ’cause they thought they could winSaid they would stand and fight until the very bloody endMr. Bush got on the phone with Iraq and Iran, and said“Now, you sons-of-bitches, you better not be doin’ any business with the Taliban”
So we prayed to Allah with all of our mightUntil those big U.S. jets came flyin’ one nightThey dropped little bombs all over their holy landMan, you should have seen ’em run, like rabbits, they ranThe Taliban
You know someday soon we’re both gonna saddle upAnd it’ll be ride, camel, rideMy old lady, she’ll be here with me, just smilin’ right by my sideWe should do just fine out around Palestine or maybe TurkmenistanWe’ll bid a fair adieu and flip a couple fingers to the TalibanWe’ll bid a fair adieu and give a big boner to the Taliban
Taliban
Whoo, y’all’s patriotic now
show less
In tribute to the late Toby Keith, who sadly left us this week. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
So yeah, I was sitting in the Trump Hotel in DC in 2018, and Lindsey Graham was over in the corner at the back bar
So yeah, I was sitting in the Trump Hotel in DC in 2018, and Lindsey Graham was over in the corner at the back bar show more
for exclusive members-only insights