New survey data from the United Kingdom has revealed that Nigel Farage’s instinct that his Reform Party should not embrace anti-grooming gangs activist and political prisoner Tommy Robinson is correct. Only 12 percent of those polled believe Farage’s approach is the “wrong decision,” vindicating those who stood by the Reform UK party leader during billionaire Elon Musk’s recent X intervention on the matter.
Sixty-five percent of Conservative Party supporters, 57 percent of Labour Party supporters, 65 percent of Liberal Democrats, 57 percent of Reform supporters, and 50 percent of Green Party supporters believe Farage made the “right decision,” indicating the Brexit leader still has his finger on the pulse of the nation.
Robinson’s support is most substantial among Reform supporters, but even there, it stands at only 21 percent. It is lowest among supporters of the Conservatives—a source of many defections for Reform in recent months—at just eight percent.
Robinson’s electoral pulling power was last tested in 2019, when Farage’s successor as UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader, Gerard Batten, ran him as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament. Robinson received only 2.2 percent of the vote in his region, with UKIP reduced to zero seats. Meanwhile, Farage’s new Brexit Party—now Reform—won the election, with a greater share of seats and votes cast than any other party by a considerable margin.
Just 12% of Brits think Nigel Farage made the “wrong decision” by saying Tommy Robinson will not be allowed to join Reform pic.twitter.com/Xusqrl7Yg3
New survey data from the United Kingdom has revealed that Nigel Farage's instinct that his Reform Party should not embrace anti-grooming gangs activist and political prisoner Tommy Robinson is correct. Only 12 percent of those polled believe Farage's approach is the "wrong decision," vindicating those who stood by the Reform UK party leader during billionaire Elon Musk's recent X intervention on the matter.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
This data proves what I said to Nigel on the phone just moments after that Elon tweet last week, wherein the South African billionaire insisted Farage should be replaced as leader for refusing to parrot his half-baked political prognostications
This data proves what I said to Nigel on the phone just moments after that Elon tweet last week, wherein the South African billionaire insisted Farage should be replaced as leader for refusing to parrot his half-baked political prognostications show more
In a fresh attempt to undermine the soaring popularity of Reform UK Party leader Nigel Farage, one of the nation’s leading corporate broadcasters, ITV News, has claimed in a headline that the Brexit leader “says government should consider allowing Shamima Begum back home.”
Begum, 25, is a hugely controversial figure in the United Kingdom, having left Britain to join the Islamic State at the age of just 15 in 2015. She was quickly married off and had three children, all of whom died. Begum began to change her tune in 2019, claiming she believed in “some British values” and claiming the Islamic State was too oppressive.
“I fled the caliphate. Now all I want to do is come home to Britain,” she told reporters. Begum was stripped of her British citizenship in the same year. She continues to challenge the decision and is currently living in a detention camp in Syria.
FARAGE.
Farage, who has been staunchly against returning Begum to the UK, was asked about the issue at Reform UK’s South East of England conference.
“I’ve never wanted to. I’ve instinctively never wanted to,” Farage said when asked about those who defected to ISIS returning to the UK.
“I’m now thoughtful, I’m thoughtful,” he added, claiming the 25-year-old shouldn’t be classified as “an all-out ISIS killer,” like many others who went to Syria and elsewhere to cause harm and destruction in the name of political Islam.
“So she’s sort of less… She is a lesser part of the equation,” he added.
GORKA.
The conversation appears to have been sparked by the comments of the incoming Trump administration’s counter-terrorism chief, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, who told The Times newspaper, “Any nation which wishes to be seen as a serious ally and friend of the most powerful nation in the world should act in a fashion that reflects that serious commitment… That is doubly so for the UK, which has a very special place in President Trump’s heart, and we would all wish to see the ‘special relationship’ fully re-established.”
Gorka’s perspective is that returning ISIS members to their countries of recent origin allows authorities to monitor them more effectively, a statement endorsed by Jonathan Hall KC, Britain’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation.
Hall said on the matter: “Officials may not welcome this, but the numbers are not so great that — at least in the case of women, and children, for whom special considerations ought to apply on humanitarian grounds — the UK’s well-regarded counter-terrorism system could not absorb the risk. The burden of monitoring could be tempered, in high-risk cases, by phased return. At the very least, there should be a presumption of return.”
FARAGE AGAIN.
“It’s very difficult for us to think we should take back people, Shamima Begum and others, and instinctively, instinctively, it’s not something I want to do,” Farage responded, in direct contravention to what ITV claims he said in their misleading headline.
“Gorka argues that if we and other European countries don’t take back these people and put them in prison here, they will get out of prison under the new Syrian regime, leading to a problem that, in the end, we may all have to fight,” the Reform leader explained.
“I think what Gorka has done is started a debate, not one that I wanted to have and not one the British government wanted to have. But now we’re going to have to,” he remarked, as U.S. pressure ramps up towards a second deconstruction of Islamic State operations and assets under an incoming Trump administration.
show less
In a fresh attempt to undermine the soaring popularity of Reform UK Party leader Nigel Farage, one of the nation's leading corporate broadcasters, ITV News, has claimed in a headline that the Brexit leader "says government should consider allowing Shamima Begum back home."
show more
A victim of child grooming gangs in the United Kingdom has labeled tech billionaire Elon Musk “narcissistic” over his recent comments on grooming gangs but acknowledged there were positives for him highlighting the issue. Gaia Cooper, who was raped and exploited by a grooming gang at just 14 years old, spoke to the Telegraph newspaper and stated that Musk’s comments “weren’t helpful.”
She added that Musk was engaging in “trolling culture” by calling Labour Member of Parliament (MP) and Minister for Safeguarding Jess Phillips a “child rape genocide sympathizer.”
Musk labeled Phillips, who once compared mass sex attacks by migrants in Cologne, Germany, to “heckling” in her home city, a “rape genocide apologist” on his X platform. This came after Phillips had refused to support a new inquiry into grooming gangs in the town of Oldham.
According to Cooper, Musk is “fighting fire with fire,” which is not useful to victims. “If you’re asking somebody to stand up and listen and fight for children using language like that, it’s not helpful,” she said.
“I don’t think they lose a wink of sleep over a survivor. It’s quite narcissistic to make it about them that they’re the heroes,” Cooper said, but added that it “can only be a good thing to highlight.”
While Cooper stated that she supports a new inquiry into grooming gangs, the governing Labour Party voted down a proposal for legislation to establish one in Parliament earlier this week.
The Labour government has also commented on Musk highlighting grooming gangs, threatening to cut security ties with the United States if President-elect Donald J. Trump does not distance himself from Musk.
Musk is expected to participate in the incoming Trump administration as part of the Department for Government Efficiency (DOGE).
A victim of child grooming gangs in the United Kingdom has labeled tech billionaire Elon Musk "narcissistic" over his recent comments on grooming gangs but acknowledged there were positives for him highlighting the issue. Gaia Cooper, who was raped and exploited by a grooming gang at just 14 years old, spoke to the Telegraph newspaper and stated that Musk's comments "weren't helpful."
show more
The British Parliament has shut down efforts to launch an inquiry into predominantly PakistaniMuslimgrooming gangs preying on predominantly white working-class girls after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party voted against them. The Conservative Party’s reasoned amendment to Labour’s Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill calling for an inquiry was decisively rejected, 364 votes to 111, with only Conservative and Reform Party lawmakers voting in favor.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch argued for the inquiry during Prime Minister’s Questions, warning of potential perceptions of a “cover-up” and accusing the government of avoiding scrutiny of Labour figures potentially involved. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer responded, misleadingly, that multiple inquiries into grooming gangs had already taken place—however, none of these were national in scope, and none have resulted in public officials who enabled or turned a blind eye to the abuse facing criminal sanctions.
The reasoned amendment would have stopped the progress of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, urging the Labour government to instead “develop new legislative proposals for children’s wellbeing at the same time as establishing a national statutory inquiry into historical child sexual exploitation, focused on grooming gangs.”
Following reports that Labour’s Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, Jess Phillips, had refused to approve a local inquiry into grooming gang abuse in Oldham, England, tech billionaire Elon Musk began pressing the issue on his X platform, causing Britain’s right-leaning press and politicians to take up the issue.
Labour threatened to cut security ties with the United States this week unless President-elect Donald J. Trump distances himself from Musk’s views, given he is set to join the administration as a co-leader of the Department for Government Efficiency (DOGE).
The British Parliament has shut down efforts to launch an inquiry into predominantly PakistaniMuslimgrooming gangs preying on predominantly white working-class girls after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Party voted against them. The Conservative Party's reasoned amendment to Labour's Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill calling for an inquiry was decisively rejected, 364 votes to 111, with only Conservative and Reform Party lawmakers voting in favor.
show more
Britain’s far-left Labour government is threatening to abandon its intelligence and national security relationships with the United States unless President-elect Donald J. Trump ends the influence of tech mogul Elon Musk in his incoming White House. According to the BBC, the demand comes from Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer himself in response to Musk’s recent comments regarding Muslim grooming gangs in the country.
“There is absolute horror at the highest levels of the government at the incendiary language we have seen from Elon Musk,” BBC Newsnight reporter Nick Watt claims, adding: “And there’s going to be, as I understand it, a hard-headed assessment. Is this just the view of Elon Musk, or is it the view of the wider administration and the incoming President Donald Trump?”
Watt continues, suggesting if Musk’s view of Britain’s handling of the rape gangs is held more broadly, the Labour government could isolate from America’s broad and powerful security network. “[T]here may well be some very, very serious questions about the nature of our ongoing security partnership with the United States,” the BBC reporter said.
Musk’s recent comments regarding groomer rapists in Britain are not his first. The South African-American billionaire and space exploration innovator posed the question of whether groups of Muslim men were still preying on British girls in August on his X (formerly Twitter) social media platform. At least one victim of the gangs responded in the affirmative.
Meanwhile, in 2023—after purchasing X—Musk reinstated anti-grooming gang activist Tommy Robinson, who had been suspended by the social media platform’s prior owners.
show less
Britain's far-left Labour government is threatening to abandon its intelligence and national security relationships with the United States unless President-elect Donald J. Trump ends the influence of tech mogul Elon Musk in his incoming White House. According to the BBC, the demand comes from Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer himself in response to Musk's recent comments regarding Muslim grooming gangs in the country.
show more
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes European populists such as Nigel Farage should be wary of accepting money from Elon Musk and other “tech bros” who may seek to alter their agenda. Speaking to Puck’s Tara Palmeri on the Somebody’s Gotta Win podcast, Kassam also predicted tech sector leaders entering D.C. politics as President-elect Donald J. Trump reclaims the White House may have a rude awakening when things do not go their way.
Kassam told Palmeri that Musk, possibly the world’s richest man, seeks power and influence rather than more money. This explains his political activities not only in the United States and the United Kingdom but also in countries where he has relatively weak personal ties, such as Italy.
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER.
The former senior adviser to Nigel Farage—leader of Britain’s Reform Party—recommended that the Brexit leader not accept the donations the Tesla owner has been considering offering to Reform. This is not only because Farage could not run a U.S.-style political campaign with the money due to British campaign laws but also because Musk—who recently said he wishes to replace Farage as party leader—could negatively influence the party’s direction.
“I think they should refuse it, and I do think I’ve changed my mind on it, having seen how he’s behaved,” referencing incidents such as Musk pushing Trump to embrace legalized mass migration through H-1B visas.
“I always give Soros as the example,” he said, explaining how, before the Hungarian-born plutocrat and other corporate donors came along, the Democratic Party “still classed itself as a pro-American worker party; a pro-union party… an anti-war party, and then suddenly all these corporate donors… come along and fundamentally change [the party].”
He recalled how the same transformation overtook the Tea Party movement, which was “completely bought and sold” by the neoliberal Koch brothers.
THE TECH BROS GO TO WASHINGTON.
Kassam predicted the “socially awkward” tech bros who have injected themselves into the America First movement may struggle to adapt to Washington politics, not least since they include “lots of people who aren’t used to being told ‘no.'”
“[M]y biggest worry is that a lot those tech bros have subscribed to a political philosophy where they truly believe that democracy, American democracy, representative democracy, is passé,” Kassam said.
“[P]eople are right to be extremely, extremely skeptical of those people,” he added. However, he stressed that the fact that he and other established figures in the conservative movement are alive to the danger, as demonstrated by the pushback to H-1B migrants, means there is hope the newcomers’ worst tendencies can be kept at bay.
LISTEN:
show less
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes European populists such as Nigel Farage should be wary of accepting money from Elon Musk and other "tech bros" who may seek to alter their agenda. Speaking to Puck's Tara Palmeri on the Somebody's Gotta Win podcast, Kassam also predicted tech sector leaders entering D.C. politics as President-elect Donald J. Trump reclaims the White House may have a rude awakening when things do not go their way.show more
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, has warned against “splitters” driving a wedge between the populist right in Britain over Tommy Robinson. His intervention follows Elon Musk, who previously backed Reform and met with party leader Nigel Farage at Mar-a-Lago, calling for the Brexiteer to be ousted over his refusal to support Tommy Robinson.
“I’m friends with both of those men; I have been for a long time. I talk to them both very frankly about it, and I’ve fallen out with both of them about talking to the other one,” Kassam said on The Charlie Kirk Show.
“But what I say is this: the people who have been critical of Nigel over the last couple of days because he doesn’t want to be allied with Tommy Robinson… This is not the time to be watching a party, the only political movement that could surge and replace the Tories and Labour, and trying to drive a wedge through the political right,” he stressed.
“The people doing that, I regard as splitters, I regard it as contrary to the greater cause, and I just think, this is a fight that the establishment, the EU, Davos, and the left, absolutely love, and we just all need to pack it in.”
Reform established a parliamentary beachhead in Britain’s July 2024 snap election, and polls now show it tying and occasionally outpacing the incumbent Labour Party and the Conservatives (Tories), who governed from 2010 to mid-2024.
Multiple high-profile Conservatives are defecting to the insurgent party, which is more authentic to conservative principles.
WATCH:
With Labour and the Conservatives teetering on the brink electorally, @RaheemKassam argues now is not the time for the British right to split over Tommy Robinson: pic.twitter.com/PWarjC9gvG
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, has warned against "splitters" driving a wedge between the populist right in Britain over Tommy Robinson. His intervention follows Elon Musk, who previously backed Reform and met with party leader Nigel Farage at Mar-a-Lago, calling for the Brexiteer to be ousted over his refusal to support Tommy Robinson.
show more
Nigel Farage’s Reform Party has welcomed a former Conservative Party Member of Parliament (MP) known for being tough on illegal immigration and a challenger of woke dogma. Marco Longhi becomes the third defector in as many months to Farage’s party, which is exploding in the polls.
Longhi—who represented the Dudley North constituency (electoral district) from 2019 to 2024—announced his shift, criticizing the current direction of the Conservative Party, describing it as “unrecognizable” compared to its former days under leaders like Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher.
“The Conservative Party I once identified with—the party of Churchill and Thatcher—has transformed into something unrecognizable, captured by a left-wing influence that masquerades as conservatism at electiontime while prioritizing the wishes of an elite few when in power,” he said, saying he would not be part of this “uniparty drift.”
A staunch Conservative, Longhi penned a letter to the Telegraph newspaper in 2020, slamming the “woke agenda” and cultural Marxism. He also confronted former Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, who resigned after a sex abuse coverup last year, on his support for illegal immigration. Longhi questioned the former Archbishop in 2022 on why he was against a plan to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda, asking if he would house illegals in his own palaces.
Reform has attracted several defectors from the Conservatives, including billionaire donor Nick Candy as treasurer and former Conservative MP Aidan Burley.
Internationally, tech billionaire Elon Musk has expressed support for Reform after meeting with Farage and Candy in Florida late last year.
Nigel Farage's Reform Party has welcomed a former Conservative Party Member of Parliament (MP) known for being tough on illegal immigration and a challenger of woke dogma. Marco Longhi becomes the third defector in as many months to Farage's party, which is exploding in the polls.
show more
A British version of Disneyland, estimated to cost over $4.3 billion, has been canceled after 14 years of planning due to a Kuwaiti businessman’s bankruptcy and the green agenda. Plans for ‘The London Resort’ were first announced nearly 14 years ago. The resort was expected to rival Disneyland Paris in size and visitors.
Promoters initially secured partnerships with major organizations such as the BBC, ITV, and Paramount Pictures. Proposed attractions included themes from popular franchises such as Top Gear, Paddington Bear, Mission: Impossible, and Doctor Who. The park’s design featured eight roller coasters, medieval castles, an Aztec pyramid, a 2,000-seat theater, and a nightclub. The project was anticipated to provide 30,000 jobs and attract 12 million visitors annually, with a planned opening in 2024.
However, financial issues and environmental concerns led to the project bogging down. The accumulation of over $123 million in debt and Natural England’s designation of the site as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) were critical factors in the decision to abandon the endeavor. Natural England, a government body, claimed the location’s previous industrial use created favorable conditions for various wildlife species, such as jumping spiders.
Paramount, an investor owed millions, alleged financial misrepresentation linked to Kuwaiti businessman Abdulla al-Humaidi, who declared bankruptcy last year. Al-Humaidi had invested nearly $50 million of his family’s funds into the project.
Along with costing the estimated 30,000 jobs and millions of dollars of tourist cash the park was set to bring in, environmental regulations in the United Kingdom have also been predicted to spark food shortages. British farmers warned in March last year that government “sustainable” farming policies incentivized farmers to use less land to grow crops.
Some green agenda advocates have even told Britons to stop heating their homes to meet carbon emission targets.
show less
A British version of Disneyland, estimated to cost over $4.3 billion, has been canceled after 14 years of planning due to a Kuwaiti businessman's bankruptcy and the green agenda. Plans for 'The London Resort' were first announced nearly 14 years ago. The resort was expected to rival Disneyland Paris in size and visitors.
show more
Britain’s King Charles III has withdrawn royal warrants from Unilever and Cadbury, ending their recognition as suppliers to the Royal Family after criticism that both still conduct business in Russia. The decision, described by Cadbury as “disappointing,” was reported last week following the release of the second set of warrants during King Charles’ reign.
Royal warrants are given to companies that regularly provide goods or services to the royal household and allow these companies to display the Royal Arms on their products. Unilever, which owns brands like Dove, Ben & Jerry’s, Hellmann’s, and Mondelez, Cadbury’s parent company, received no specific explanation for the removals. According to the Royal Family’s website, warrants may not be renewed if the quality or supply of products or services is found lacking.
However, this change comes amid ongoing criticism from Ukraine’s government over these companies’ business activities in Russia. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, both Unilever and Mondelez have continued operations in Russia.
In June, the activist group B4Ukraine addressed an open letter to King Charles, urging him to withdraw royal warrants from companies including Mondelez and Unilever, alleging their presence in Russia is prolonging the conflict in Ukraine.
In response to the warrant cancellations, Mondelez expressed disappointment but respect for the decision, emphasizing pride in its long history of holding the royal warrant. Unilever similarly highlighted its longstanding service to the royal household and previous recognition by Queen Elizabeth II.
Britain's King Charles III has withdrawn royal warrants from Unilever and Cadbury, ending their recognition as suppliers to the Royal Family after criticism that both still conduct business in Russia. The decision, described by Cadbury as "disappointing," was reported last week following the release of the second set of warrants during King Charles' reign.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
