GET THE APP
Wednesday, March 25, 2026
12 minutes ago
Crime
Immigration

CBP Just Seized 120 Pounds of Meth at the U.S.-Mexico Border.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers seized over 120 pounds of methamphetamine during two enforcement actions at the Nogales Port of Entry.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: CBP officers, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) special agents, and two drivers who were arrested.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The seizures occurred on March 10 and March 11 at the Mariposa and DeConcini Crossings in Nogales, Arizona.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Our streets are safer thanks to the dedication of our CBP officers.” – Jose Acuna, Acting Port Director at Nogales Port of Entry.

🎯IMPACT: The seizures prevented a significant quantity of methamphetamine from reaching U.S. streets.

IN FULL

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers earlier this month seized over 120 pounds of methamphetamine at the Nogales Port of Entry along America’s southern border. The illicit drugs were uncovered during two separate enforcement actions on March 10 and 11.

“Our frontline officers’ ability to apply training, inspection experience, and technology allowed them to zero in and take down a couple of significant drug loads,” Acting Port Director Jose Acuna said of the methamphetamine seizure. He added, “Our streets are safer thanks to the dedication of our CBP officers.”

According to the CBP, on March 10, officers at the Mariposa Crossing seized nearly 44 pounds of methamphetamine concealed in a 2007 Acura RL. Using a non-intrusive inspection system, officers conducted a closer physical examination and discovered 32 packages of methamphetamine hidden in the back seat of the vehicle. The drugs and the vehicle were seized, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) special agents arrested the driver, launching a criminal investigation.

The following day, on March 11, CBP officers at the DeConcini Crossing seized over 76 pounds of methamphetamine hidden in a 2019 Volkswagen Polo. An inspection scan and physical examination led to the discovery of 70 packages of methamphetamine concealed in a false floor compartment of the vehicle. The narcotics and the vehicle were seized, and the driver was arrested as part of an ongoing investigation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
33 minutes ago
TECH

Nvidia CEO Boasts New AI Feat – ‘I Think We’ve Achieved AGI.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang claimed during a podcast interview that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has already been achieved.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, and podcaster Lex Fridman.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The remarks were made during a two-hour podcast hosted by Lex Fridman.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I think it’s now. I think we’ve achieved AGI.” – Jensen Huang

🎯IMPACT: Huang’s comments have reignited debates over AGI timelines and its implications for the future of AI and computing.

IN FULL

Jensen Huang, the CEO of U.S. technology giant Nvidia, has made the startling claim that the artificial intelligence (AI) industry has likely already achieved the landmark development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Broadly, AGI is defined as an AI system that can understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a wide range of tasks at a human or superhuman level, unlike current so-called “narrow” AI systems that excel only in specific, predefined tasks.

Speaking with podcast host Lex Fridman, Huang was asked about his thoughts on where AI labs are on the “AGI timeline” and whether the technological achievement was still five, ten, or 20 years away—especially given recent developments in AI “agent” tools like OpenClaw. “I think it’s now. I think we’ve achieved AGI,” Huang stated.


Importantly, Huang’s definition of AGI differs slightly from consensus views. In 2023, the Nvidia CEO stated that he defines AGI simply as AI technology capable of exceeding normal human intelligence at a competitive level. Huang explained that, under his narrower interpretation, AGI does not need to create lasting systems or manage complex businesses. Instead, it only needs to generate a significant economic impact, such as developing a viral web service or app used by billions of people at minimal cost per user.

He compared the current capabilities of AI to those of the early dot-com era, suggesting that some websites from that time were no more advanced than what AI agents can create today. Based on this perspective, he reiterated, “I think we’ve achieved AGI.”

Huang’s more grounded view of AGI may indicate that the current state of the technology is still well short of the superhuman, adaptive intelligence envisioned by other technologists.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad
53 minutes ago
Immigration
Lawfare

The State of Minnesota is Suing the Trump Admin. Here’s Why…

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The state of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging federal authorities obstructed access to evidence in three shootings involving federal agents.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Defendants include the Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Attorney General Pam Bondi, and former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incidents occurred in January in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “At stake is not only Plaintiffs’ access to evidence central to these shootings but also a fundamental principle of our constitutional system: that the States retain the sovereign authority—and responsibility—to investigate crimes committed within their borders,” the complaint stated.

🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks to compel federal authorities to provide evidence, claiming their obstruction violates the Tenth Amendment and undermines state sovereignty.

IN FULL

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz‘s (D) government has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing federal authorities of withholding evidence in three shootings involving federal agents and Minneapolis residents. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday, names the Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Attorney General Pam Bondi, and former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem as defendants.

In the filing, attorneys for the state of Minnesota contend that the federal government has engaged in “unprecedented noncooperation,” and “has deprived state investigators of timely access to evidence in federal custody that is directly relevant to their investigations of potential violations of Minnesota criminal law.” The Walz administration is asking the federal court to “secure access to the evidence necessary to investigate these shooting incidents and to ensure that the State of Minnesota can fulfill its sovereign duty to determine whether federal officers committed crimes within its borders.”

The incidents include the fatal shootings of anti-ICE activists Renee Good on January 7 and Alex Pretti on January 24. Additionally, a Venezuelan illegal immigrant, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, was shot in the leg by an ICE agent on January 14 but survived. Minnesota investigators claim federal authorities blocked access to evidence in all three cases.

The filing alleges that federal agents physically blocked Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension investigators from accessing the scene, even after a judicial warrant was obtained. The complaint concludes, “At stake is not only Plaintiffs’ access to evidence central to these shootings but also a fundamental principle of our constitutional system: that the States retain the sovereign authority—and responsibility—to investigate crimes committed within their borders.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
1 hour ago
News

Trump Admin Hands $1BN to French Firm to Cancel Wind Farm Deal.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is paying $928 million to TotalEnergies to cancel its offshore wind farm leases off the coasts of New York and North Carolina.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: TotalEnergies, the Trump administration, the Interior Department, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The deal was announced on Monday and involves federal waters off New York and North Carolina.

💬KEY QUOTE: TotalEnergies CEO, Patrick Pouyanné, stated that offshore wind was deemed “not the most affordable way to produce electricity” and that pursuing it in the U.S. was too expensive.

🎯IMPACT: Funds intended for renewable energy are being redirected to fossil fuel projects, sparking criticism from environmentalists.

IN FULL

The Trump administration announced a $928 million deal with French energy company TotalEnergies to cancel offshore wind farm leases in federal waters off New York and North Carolina. The agreement was revealed by the Interior Department and involves a refund of the lease payments made under the former Biden government.

In return, TotalEnergies has committed to redirecting the refunded monies into oil and gas projects, including ramping up oil production in the Gulf of America and building additional gas-fired power plants to meet data center electricity demand. The company’s CEO, Patrick Pouyanné, stated that offshore wind was deemed “not the most affordable way to produce electricity” and that pursuing it in the U.S. was too “expensive.”

Environmentalists have criticized the deal, arguing that funds meant for renewable energy are now being funneled into fossil fuel projects. New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) condemned the agreement, calling it “an outrageous abuse of taxpayer dollars.”

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is expected to use its Judgment Fund to cover the costs of the agreement.

Image by Olivier Dugornay.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
2 hours ago
Immigration
Lawfare

A Deportee Just Filed a $1.3 Million Lawsuit Against the United States.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Venezuelan man deported to El Salvador and detained in the country’s CECOT mega-prison has filed a lawsuit in the U.S., seeking $1.3 million in damages for alleged false imprisonment and emotional distress.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and advocacy groups including LULAC and the Democracy Defenders Fund.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Leon Rengel was detained in 2025 in El Salvador’s CECOT prison; lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There came a point when I thought about hanging myself with the sheet they gave us.” – Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel

🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks to challenge the use of wartime powers for deportation and the treatment of detainees in foreign facilities.

IN FULL

Venezuelan national Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel, 28, has filed a lawsuit in the United States seeking $1.3 million in damages for the mistreatment he claims he suffered during four months of detention in El Salvador’s CECOT mega-prison. Deported by U.S. authorities in 2025, he claims he endured beatings, inhumane conditions, and severe psychological trauma, and that the detention amounted to “torture” under international law.

Leon Rengel described his time in CECOT as “total hell,” claiming he was forced to drink the same water used for bathing and that guards warned him he would be imprisoned for 90 years. “There came a point when I thought about hanging myself with the sheet they gave us,” he said.

The lawsuit, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, contends that he was falsely imprisoned and deliberately subjected to emotional distress. Advocacy organizations, including the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the Democracy Defenders Fund, are backing his legal action. “What happened to Adrián Rengel is government-sanctioned torture,” alleged Juan Proaño, LULAC’s CEO.

Leon Rengel was deported under the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime measure the Trump administration invoked to address the “invasion” of the U.S. by migrant gangs. Leon Rengel insists he has no gang ties and says he was wrongly identified because of a tattoo. “I’ve never been a gang member, nor a member of a criminal group,” he claimed.

Now back in Venezuela, Leon Rengel says he has no plans to return to the U.S.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
2 hours ago
Corruption
World

Italy’s Justice Minister Just Resigned Over Mafia Connections.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Andrea Delmastro, Undersecretary of State at the Italian Ministry of Justice, resigned following reports of his alleged stake in a restaurant chain linked to the mafia.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Andrea Delmastro, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Justice Minister Carlo Nordio, and mafia-linked ex-convict Andrea Caroccia.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Italy; Delmastro’s resignation was announced on Tuesday, shortly after Meloni’s government was defeated in a judicial reform referendum earlier in the week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Although I did nothing wrong, I made an error of judgment, which I corrected as soon as I became aware of it. I take responsibility for that.” – Andrea Delmastro

🎯IMPACT: The resignation is another blow to Giorgia Meloni’s governing coalition, so soon after its defeat in the judicial reform referendum.

IN FULL

Andrea Delmastro, Undersecretary of State at Italy’s Ministry of Justice, has resigned amid claims that he held a stake in a restaurant business connected to the mafia. Delmastro co-owned a Rome eatery with the daughter of Andrea Caroccia, who was previously convicted for links to the Camorra, the mafia group based in Naples.

Delmastro insisted he had done nothing illegal and said he had sold his interest as soon as he learned of Caroccia’s criminal background. Questions grew, however, after a 2023 photograph emerged of Delmastro standing alongside Caroccia, indicating the two may have known each other earlier. It was also reported that he had not disclosed his business stake to parliament, as required by law.

The controversy follows shortly after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government suffered a loss in a national referendum. Voters turned down a judicial overhaul promoted by Meloni’s governing coalition, with 54 percent casting ballots against the measure. Meloni responded to the outcome by saying, “Italian citizens have decided and we respect their decision as always. We will move forward as we always have: with responsibility, determination, and above all, with respect for Italy and its people.”

Leftist political and media figures were initially fearful that Meloni, who campaigned on a strong anti-mass migration, populist platform, could be the most right-wing leader in Italy since Benito Mussolini. However, when she entered office in late 2022, there was an initial surge in illegal immigration, and she has also increased legal immigration, arguing that Italy and Europe “need” migrants. Instead of immigration, she has often seemed more focused on supporting Ukraine and befriending European Union (EU) officials.

Image © European Union, 1998 – 2026.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad
2 hours ago
War

Israel Wants ‘Several More Weeks’ of War to Achieve ‘Full Strategic Victory.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Israeli military officials estimate several more weeks of fighting are needed to achieve war goals in Iran, though U.S. efforts to end the conflict could alter the timeline.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Israeli military, President Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran, and intermediaries from Pakistan, Egypt, Oman, and Turkey.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Ongoing conflict centered in Iran and Israel, with diplomatic efforts spanning multiple nations.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are in many ways halfway there. There are very significant achievements, both at the tactical level and at the strategic level. But there has not been a full strategic victory.” – Senior Israeli military official.

🎯IMPACT: The conflict has degraded Iran’s military capabilities and delayed its nuclear plans, but significant threats remain, and diplomatic efforts are ongoing.

IN FULL

Israeli military leaders have indicated that their forces need several more weeks of war to fully meet their objectives against Iran. This comes as President Donald J. Trump is pushing for a ceasefire, recently describing U.S.-led discussions with Iran as “productive.”

Backchannel talks involving Pakistan, Egypt, Oman, and Turkey are reportedly underway. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has recognized Trump’s initiative but stopped short of fully backing it. “President Trump believes there is an opportunity to leverage the tremendous achievements we have reached alongside the U.S. military to realize the goals of the war through an agreement, an agreement that will safeguard our vital interests,” he remarked.

Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are reportedly working on a month-long ceasefire so a 15-point peace plan can be agreed, but Israeli media reports that the prospect of a “rapid, ambiguous agreement in principle is giving Israel’s political and security leaders sleepless nights.”

Although Israel maintains that it has destroyed the majority of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers, Tehran is still firing missiles, including one that recently hit a residential neighborhood in Tel Aviv. “We are in many ways halfway there,” a senior Israeli military official stated. “There are very significant achievements, both at the tactical level and at the strategic level. But there has not been a full strategic victory.”

Israel has also been conducting operations against Iran’s Hezbollah proxies in Lebanon, and recently confirmed it intends to seize the south of the country in order to create a security buffer.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
3 hours ago
William Upton
War
World

Trump’s Envoys Are Working on a Month-Long Iran Ceasefire – But Israel Doesn’t Want It.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A month-long ceasefire may be taking shape between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, U.S. special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, and Iranian and Israeli government officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The possible ceasefire was reported on Tuesday, March 24, 2026.

🎯IMPACT: According to Israeli media, the temporary cessation of hostilities is meant to allow the two nations to engage in negotiations over a multi-point peace plan, but the prospect is “giving Israel’s political and security leaders sleepless nights.”

IN FULL

A month-long ceasefire may be taking shape between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to Israeli media, the temporary cessation of hostilities is meant to allow the two nations to engage in negotiations over a multi-point peace plan that would mirror agreements negotiated by U.S. special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Gaza and Lebanon.

While details of any proposed ceasefire and subsequent peace plan have not been made public, speculation on the latter suggests the U.S. is seeking a guarantee that Iran will dismantle its current nuclear sites and capabilities, along with an agreement that the Islamist regime will cease funding regional terror proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis—along with Shia militias in Iraq.

Israel is said to be skeptical of the plan, with the country’s media noting that the possibility of a “rapid, ambiguous agreement in principle is giving Israel’s political and security leaders sleepless nights.”

The National Pulse reported earlier on Tuesday that Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif offered to host peace talks between the United States and Iran. In a post on social media, Sharif tagged President Donald J. Trump, Steve Witkoff, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Pakistani sources have also indicated that Vice President J.D. Vance is favored as a possible lead negotiator, and that the Iranians are interested in speaking to special envoy Jared Kushner—Trump’s son-in-law—as well as Witkoff.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon has announced the deployment of 3,000 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East. The move comes amid reports of potential military operations targeting Iranian assets such as Kharg Island, a major oil export hub.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
3 hours ago
News

US Deploying 3,000 Troops from 82nd Airborne.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Pentagon is deploying 3,000 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran, The National Pulse understands.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Department of War, Iranian military officials, and American allies in the Gulf.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Deployment announcement expected shortly, involving the Middle East and strategic locations such as Kharg Island.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Our armed forces will fight until complete victory against the U.S. and Israel.” – Iranian military spokesman.

🎯IMPACT: Rising tensions, with Iran launching missile attacks on Israel and U.S. allies in the Gulf.

IN FULL

The Pentagon has announced the deployment of 3,000 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, The National Pulse understands.

This move comes amid escalating tensions and reports of potential military operations targeting Iranian assets such as Kharg Island, a major oil export hub.

Iranian officials have previously dismissed claims made by President Donald J. Trump regarding “productive talks” or a “five-day ceasefire” between the U.S. and Iran, though The National Pulse understands unofficial conversations have been taking place, with Iran’s parliamentary speaker involved.

Officially, a spokesman for Iran’s top military command stated, “Our armed forces will fight until complete victory against the U.S. and Israel.”

The news comes as U.S. officials head to Pakistan for ceasefire talks, while the Israeli government demands more time at war to achieve “full strategic victory.”

The latest polling on the matter shows Trump’s MAGA base still broadly supportive of the military action, though other elements of his coalition, notably the ‘MAHA’ and ‘America First’ wings, are less enthused.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
4 hours ago
Data
Politics

Ken Paxton is Beating John Cornyn in ANOTHER Poll. Here’s What the Data is Telling Us…

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll shows Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) leading Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) in the Lone Star State’s Republican Senate runoff, with many former supporters of Representative Wesley Hunt (R-TX) now backing Paxton.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ken Paxton, John Cornyn, Wesley Hunt, and Texas Republican voters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Poll results were reported on Tuesday; the runoff election is scheduled for May 26 in Texas.

💬KEY QUOTE: The runoff electorate is “largely settled, highly certain to vote, and not especially movable,” according to the Quantus Insights report.

🎯IMPACT: Paxton’s lead, voter certainty, and favorability ratings suggest he enters the runoff with a significant advantage.

IN FULL

New data released on Tuesday shows Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) leading Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) 48.8 percent to 41.3 percent, with 9.9 percent undecided, ahead of the May 26 primary runoff race. The poll, conducted by Quantus Insights, also revealed that nearly 58 percent of Representative Wesley Hunt’s (R-TX) supporters have shifted to Paxton, indicating there is a consolidation of anti-Cornyn voters.

Additionally, the survey of Texas voters suggests the electorate has largely become entrenched, with 88.1 percent of respondents certain to vote and 78.7 percent describing their choice as definite. Among Paxton’s supporters, 88 percent said their vote is definite, compared to 86 percent of Cornyn’s supporters. Notably, 92 percent of Paxton voters are certain to vote, compared to 86 percent of Cornyn voters.

Quantus Insights describes the runoff electorate as “largely settled, highly certain to vote, and not especially movable.” Paxton was noted to have “the clearer edge in ballot support, favorability, and perceived effectiveness.” Meanwhile, the potential of a presidential endorsement was also analyzed, with 25.3 percent of respondents saying President Donald J. Trump’s endorsement would make them more likely to support Paxton, while 63 percent said it would make no difference. For Cornyn, 18.3 percent said Trump’s endorsement would increase their support, while 70 percent said it would not affect their decision.

Last week, The National Pulse reported that a separate voter poll found Paxton leading Cornyn by a wider margin, 53 percent to 37 percent, among likely Republican runoff voters. This survey also found Paxton with a higher favorability rating (64 percent favorable, 31 percent unfavorable) compared to Cornyn (45 percent favorable, 47 percent unfavorable).

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad