Wednesday, August 5, 2026

New York Times Cover-Up: Bill Gates Shielded from Epstein Editorial Scrutiny, Financial Disclosures.

The New York Times has quietly added editor’s notes to nine columns by failed Oregon gubernatorial candidate Nicholas Kristof after admitting that the veteran opinion writer repeatedly failed to disclose that people he quoted, or organizations he promoted, had financed his short-lived campaign.

The newspaper has called the omissions an oversight and says its review is complete, yet The National Pulse can reveal that none of the four favorable columns involving Bill Gates or the Gates Foundation identified in the original report was among those corrected, despite Gates and his then-wife, Melinda French Gates, having given Kristof’s campaign $50,000 apiece.

KRISTOF AND THE TIMES.

Semafor broke the original story in June, finding at least a dozen instances in which Kristof had written about his own former supporters without telling readers about their donations. This, despite an explicit promise by the New York Times, when Kristof returned to the paper, that he would either refrain from writing about his supporters, or at least disclose the connection.

Kristof had left the Times in 2021 to seek the Democratic nomination for governor of Oregon, raising nearly $2.5 million before the Oregon Supreme Court unanimously upheld his exclusion from the ballot for failing to meet the state’s three-year residency requirement.

The TimesEthical Journalism Handbook requires staff members to avoid conduct that might “raise questions about their journalistic fairness and independence,” while also warning that political activity by a spouse or family member may create a conflict or the appearance of one.

Kristof nevertheless cited donors as authorities and promoted organizations connected to them without the promised disclosures.

He mentioned Deborah Fikes, who had given $10,000, in a 2024 column about North Korea; quoted McKinsey managing partner Bob Sternfels in a 2023 column about India without noting that Sternfels and his wife had given $5,000; and quoted the late Harvard professor Joseph Nye in columns about college admissions and China and Taiwan without mentioning Nye’s $1,000 contribution.

Larry Gilson, the founder of Focusing Philanthropy, gave $25,000 before Kristof featured the organization in his 2023, 2024 and 2025 giving guides. Vision to Learn appeared in the 2025 guide and a 2026 column even though its director, Joan Chu Reese, had donated $2,500 and Oregon Strong, the political action committee that received Kristof’s leftover campaign funds, had given the group $100,000. Kristof also wrote about CARE without disclosing that board members Michael Lynton and Richard Stengel had each contributed several thousand dollars.

Times spokesman Charlie Stadtlander told Semafor that the donations “should have been made more clear to readers.” By July, the paper had completed its review and provided Fox News with nine columns carrying fresh editor’s notes.

THE GATES EXEMPTION.

Oregon campaign-finance reporting confirms that Bill and Melinda French Gates gave Kristof $50,000 each. Semafor identified four subsequent columns in which Kristof cited Gates, his foundation, its statistics or its recommendations without mentioning that $100,000 in political support.

In “Cheer Up! The World Is Better Off Than You Think,” published in December 2022, Kristof cited Gates’s prediction that a gene-editing technique being developed for sickle-cell disease might eventually offer a cure for HIV/AIDS. In May 2023, his column on an education “revolution” in Sierra Leone highlighted Gates’s praise for education minister Moinina David Sengeh and his book, Radical Inclusion.

Four months later, Kristof’s “Coming Soon in New York: Cocktails, Steak and Hypocrisy” promoted a Gates Foundation plan that he said could save two million mothers and children over a decade. The foundation’s 2023 Goalkeepers report called for policy changes, greater investment in women’s health and more health workers, including midwives.

In December 2025, Kristof cited the Gates Foundation’s estimate that deaths among children under five had risen by more than 200,000 that year and repeated Gates’s comparison of the dead to 5,000 classrooms of children. The foundation’s 2025 report was also a policy appeal to finance Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Global Fund. That position ran directly against Trump administration policy: its fiscal 2026 budget proposed no money for Gavi, while Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the United States would provide no further funding unless the organization changed its approach to vaccine safety.

These were more than passing references, too. Kristof used Gates or his foundation to validate factual claims, recommend a book, support a technology forecast and advance public-policy arguments involving foreign aid. None of the four columns disclosed the donations, and none was included among the nine pieces identified by the Times after its review.

In “The World Needs More Nick Kristofs”, Gates wrote that Kristof’s 1997 reporting on childhood deaths from diarrhea gave his philanthropy a mission and helped set the direction of the Gates Foundation. He also offered a warm endorsement of Kristof’s memoir, Chasing Hope. The two, in other words, are extremely close.

LEFTOVER CAMPAIGN CASH.

In August 2022, Kristof’s campaign transferred $992,031.78 to Oregon Strong. Rolling Stone reported that nearly half of his campaign haul remained under family control and quoted Kristof saying the new organization would be nonpolitical and finance job-training programs. State filings now classify Oregon Strong as a miscellaneous PAC that is not candidate-controlled and list Elizabeth Wilson, rather than Kristof or his wife, Sheryl WuDunn, as treasurer.

The transaction ledger records no contribution to a job-training program. Instead, its principal payments were $100,000 to Vision to Learn in 2023 and $2,000 to A Progressive Voice for Oregon in 2024. As of August 4, 2026, the official account summary showed $889,626.78 in cash and no activity during 2026. Kristof told Fox that he had not been involved with Oregon Strong since 2022, had “zero plans” to seek office again and believed the questions were a bad-faith attempt to discredit his journalism.

BEYOND THE DONATIONS.

Critics have also contrasted Kristof’s favorable treatment of Gates with his writing about Jeffrey Epstein’s associates. Kristof mentioned Donald Trump’s trips aboard Epstein’s aircraft in a 2023 column, mentioned former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak at the 2025 DealBook Summit, and called for investigations of Trump and others in a February 2026 column, while acknowledging that the allegations he cited lacked evidence of wrongdoing.

But Kristof’s favorable Gates columns failed to mention Gates’s own, expansive dealings with Epstein. A Gates Foundation review identified roughly 30 meetings involving Epstein and 10 foundation leaders or staff, including Gates himself, between 2011 and 2014.

The Times’ own editor’s notes establish that its disclosure promise was repeatedly broken, but there are still questions. Why did a $1,000 donation from Joseph Nye require a correction, while $100,000 from Bill and Melinda French Gates did not? Until the newspaper explains these exceptions, its corrections address only part of the problem it acknowledged, and its credibility remains in tatters.

show less
The New York Times has quietly added editor’s notes to nine columns by failed Oregon gubernatorial candidate Nicholas Kristof after admitting that the veteran opinion writer repeatedly failed to disclose that people he quoted, or organizations he promoted, had financed his short-lived campaign. show more

EU Pressures Spain to Accept ‘Special Measures’ Amid Migrant Crisis.

The European Union has urged Spain to accept special measures after tens of thousands of illegal migrants overwhelmed its borders, sparking disputes among EU member states.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) has urged Spain to accept enhanced monitoring measures following the migrant crisis in Ceuta, where roughly 70,000 illegal migrants crossed into the Spanish exclave on the coast of North Africa last week. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has also been asked to provide verified figures on how many migrants have been returned to Morocco.
📺 DETAIL: Spanish officials have offered differing estimates of how many migrants remain in Ceuta, with Government delegate Miguel Ángel Pérez placing the figure at about 2,500 while regional leader Juan Jesús Vivas said it could be as high as 5,000. EU member states have requested independent verification of Spain’s reported return numbers and a review of lessons learned to prevent similar incidents, according to diplomatic sources. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, formerly a German government minister under Angela Merkel, praised Spain’s response and offered additional EU Border Agency support and funding. Sánchez criticized some European partners for what he described as “selfish, polarising and unlawful” reactions to the crisis, likely caused in part by his decision to offer a mass amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegals earlier in the year, accusing them of exploiting the crisis for political purposes.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The images coming from Ceuta are striking and demonstrate, once again, that uncontrolled illegal immigration poses a concrete threat to the security of Europe’s borders.” – Giorgia Meloni, Italian Prime Minister
🎯 IMPACT: The crisis has highlighted deep divisions within the EU over migration policy. Italy and France have pushed for stronger border controls in response to the Ceuta incident and for improved coordination to protect the EU’s common borders.
📺 FLASHBACK: Ceuta, a Spanish exclave on the coast of North Africa, just eight miles from the Spanish mainland, has long been a focal point for illegal migration into the European Union due to its border with Morocco. The city has been Spanish since the 1500s, and is one of two Spanish exclaves on the North African coast, along with Melilla. Illegal migrants also reach Spanish territory by sailing directly for the mainland, and for the Canary Islands off the coast of West Africa.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The European Union has urged Spain to accept special measures after tens of thousands of illegal migrants overwhelmed its borders, sparking disputes among EU member states.

show more

UK Govt ‘Deportation’ Deal Has Brought in More Migrants Than It Has Removed.

The so-called “one in, one out” deportation agreement between the United Kingdom and France has led to more migrants being admitted to Britain than being removed.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: More illegal immigrants have arrived in the United Kingdom under the Labour government’s “one in, one out” deal with France than have been removed from the country.
📺 DETAIL: In July last year, under former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, in collaboration with French President Emmanuel Macron, the United Kingdom and France agreed a deal to tackle the rising number of small boats carrying illegal migrants launched from northern France. This deal states that for every migrant the United Kingdom returns to France after an illegal Channel crossing, the United Kingdom agrees to admit one different migrant from France through a legal, approved route. However, it has been revealed that, under this supposedly equitable deal, 1,117 migrants have been admitted to Britain while only 1,087 illegals have been removed. This means that Britain has accepted more arrivals than it has returned. The new data follows new Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s defense of the government’s current approach to the Channel crisis.
🎯 IMPACT: These new figures are likely to cast doubt on the government’s border control strategy. This new data suggests that the British government is not deporting illegal immigrants fast enough or in particularly high numbers. This is potentially down to the fact that illegal Channel crossings have spiked under new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham. This is likely to create pressure on the new Prime Minister, especially in light of the crisis in Ceuta, Spain, in which approximately 70,000 illegal migrants rushed the exclave’s border with Morocco. If the Labour government cannot fulfill the objective of its own deal, voters may look to parties offering more thorough measures, such as Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which recently unveiled “Operation Fortress” on Monday. This program would use the Royal Navy to deter small boats carrying illegal migrants across the English Channel.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is not the first time that the deal with France has come under scrutiny. Back in October 2025, a boat migrant deported to France under the deal simply returned to Britain on another small boat. “If I had felt that France was safe for me, I would never have returned to the UK,” said the migrant at the time.

Image by Pedro Gontijo/Senado Federal.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The so-called "one in, one out" deportation agreement between the United Kingdom and France has led to more migrants being admitted to Britain than being removed.

show more

UK PM Burnham, Spanish PM Sanchez Going on Vacation Amid Twin Migrant Crises.

The British and Spanish prime ministers have decided to go on vacation as their respective countries grapple with ongoing illegal immigration crises, raising concerns that Andy Burnham and Pedro Sánchez are neglecting their duties.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Far-left Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has gone on holiday amid a migrant surge into the Spanish city of Ceuta, and new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has decided to take a break just two weeks into the role despite a growing influx of boat migrants.
📺 DETAIL: Pedro Sánchez traveled to the Canary Islands off the west coast of Africa just days after the crisis at Ceuta, a Spanish enclave bordering Morocco in north Africa. The European Union (EU) has since called an emergency meeting to address the ongoing crisis and EU border security more broadly. Around the same time, new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced that he was going on vacation as well. Having only been in office for 15 days, Burnham has taken a holiday earlier in his tenure than any modern British Prime Minister. Similar to the Spanish Prime Minister, Burnham opted to go on vacation shortly after he finally publicly addressed the illegal migration crisis in the United Kingdom. Burnham invited criticism from the public and Members of Parliament (MPs) after suggesting that the government’s border strategy was working despite a spike in illegal arrivals throughout his first few weeks in office.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Two weeks into the job and Andy Burnham has already had enough. After dropping a number of unfunded commitments and overseeing over 2,000 illegal migrants breaking into our country he’s bunked off for a jolly abroad. This isn’t a prime minister that’s serious about leading.” – Lee Anderson, Chairman of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party
🎯 IMPACT: The decision by both leaders to take breaks amid growing concerns about border security will likely be perceived by the public as an attempt to avoid accountability and to cast doubt on their commitment to addressing illegal immigration.
📺 FLASHBACK: Last week, it was reported that roughly 70,000 migrants had rushed the Spanish border with Morocco. In response, Italy suspended its EU free movement agreement with Spain, and other EU countries called for Spain’s participation in the EU’s free movement area to be suspended. Thousands of migrants continue to remain in Ceuta, overwhelming public services and occupying public spaces. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British and Spanish prime ministers have decided to go on vacation as their respective countries grapple with ongoing illegal immigration crises, raising concerns that Andy Burnham and Pedro Sánchez are neglecting their duties.

show more

Colombia’s Outgoing Marxist Prez Warns of ‘Civil War’ as Trump-Backed Successor Prepares to Take Office.

Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro claims the country’s defeated leftist presidential candidate actually won the election, warning of potential violence as Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella prepares for inauguration.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Outgoing far-left President of Colombia Gustavo Petro has threatened “civil war” if Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella is allowed to take power.
📺 DETAIL: Abelardo De la Espriella, a conservative lawyer, decisively won the Colombian presidential run-off election against his leftist rival, Iván Cepeda, back in June. In response to Espriella’s victory, Petro, the country’s first leftist president, accused “moneyed Israeli” interests of interfering with Colombian democracy and suggested that Espriella’s victory was a triumph of so-called “narcofascism.” Petro suggested that Cepeda had actually won the election. “We are before a fraud and an institutional problem that is undoubtedly profound, and that is the possession of an illegitimate president because he who won is named Iván Cepeda,” said the outgoing President. “This causes not just the judicial discussion that needs to happen, etc, but a major political problem,” Petro added. He concluded that the “electoral regime in Colombia must change substantially if we don’t want more violence.” Petro previously conceded the left had been defeated in June, but has since reversed his position. Espriella called Petro’s comments an “affront to the sovereign decision of the Colombian people.” The President-elect declared, “So-called ‘civil disobedience’ is a euphemism to try to destabilize democracy.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It is very clear that what can happen is a civil war in Colombia… The policies of sweeping away social reforms of the people will only augment the people’s resistance that can reach unimaginable levels.” – President Gustavo Petro.
🎯 IMPACT: Petro’s comments risk destabilizing the country ahead of Espriella’s inauguration. It also represents a reversal of his initial concession of defeat when Cepeda, a member of his party, lost to Espriella during the run-off election. Petro’s rhetoric accusing Espriella of being a fascist echoes similar attacks on President Donald J. Trump, especially during and after the 2024 Presidential election.
📺 FLASHBACK: Espriella’s victory represents a continuing trend of South American countries shifting rightwards. Back in June, right-wing presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori was narrowly elected as Peru’s first female president. These followed right-wing victories in Argentina, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Chile, Ecuador, and Paraguay.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro claims the country's defeated leftist presidential candidate actually won the election, warning of potential violence as Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella prepares for inauguration.

show more

The U.S. is Running Out of Missiles.

The depletion of advanced missile stockpiles raises concerns about U.S. military readiness for potential conflicts with other global adversaries.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Army has depleted much of its global stockpile of long-range precision missiles after five months of military operations against Iran, with sources stating that the military has used virtually all of its Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM).
📺 DETAIL: The missiles, which cost more than $1 million each and have also been supplied to Ukraine, are considered critical for striking targets from long distances while reducing risks to pilots, and officials say the dwindling inventory could limit the U.S. military’s ability to deter adversaries such as Russia and China. President Donald J. Trump has dismissed such concerns, saying the United States still has more munitions than any other country and that defense manufacturers are producing weapons at record levels while expanding production capacity. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also insisted the U.S. military retains the capabilities needed to carry out operations wherever and whenever directed by the President. However, analysts caution that although production has increased, stockpiles of key munitions may not be sufficient for a prolonged conflict, and military leaders have reportedly warned the administration that supplies of Patriot missile interceptors and other defensive systems are also running low. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, roughly 65 percent of Patriot interceptors and at least 38 percent of THAAD missile interceptors have been expended since the conflict began, figures that sources said align with internal U.S. assessments. One source also said the U.S. has used nearly half of its global stockpile of Navy Tomahawk cruise missiles during the campaign. Defense contractors Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are expanding production as the Pentagon works to replenish critical weapons inventories.
🎯 IMPACT: The missile shortage has already affected U.S. military operations, with implications for allied nations like Ukraine, which relies on U.S. air defense systems. The strain on stockpiles has raised concerns about the U.S. military’s ability to sustain prolonged conflicts or effectively counter future threats.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “U.S. defense companies are, at this moment, making more munitions than they have ever made before.” – President Trump

Image by John Carkeet.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The depletion of advanced missile stockpiles raises concerns about U.S. military readiness for potential conflicts with other global adversaries.

show more

DOJ Cracks Down on Multi-Million Medicare, Medicaid Fraud in Dem City.

The Department of Justice announced the expansion of its Health Care Fraud Strike Force to Philadelphia, with 19 defendants charged in schemes involving over $4 million in fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid claims.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Department of Justice announced Tuesday it is expanding its Northeast Health Care Fraud Strike Force to Philadelphia, creating a new office in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to strengthen efforts against alleged Medicare and Medicaid fraud involving home health care services. The initiative brings together the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Federal and Pennsylvania authorities simultaneously charged 19 defendants accused of participating in schemes involving more than $4 million in fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid claims, including home health care company owners, employees, aides, and Medicaid recipients.
📺 DETAIL:  Prosecutors allege some defendants billed Medicaid for services while they were incarcerated, hospitalized, working other jobs, or traveling overseas, while others submitted overlapping or impossible work hours, including claims for more than 24 hours of care in a single day. One home health care agency and its owners were also charged with allegedly billing Medicaid using false clock-in and clock-out records. The Justice Department said the Philadelphia strike force will work alongside the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and other law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute health care fraud. Officials said the expansion follows the recent addition of strike force offices in several other states and comes after nationwide enforcement actions involving more than $15 billion in alleged health care fraud losses in 2025 and more than $6 billion in alleged losses in 2026.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Strike Force’s expansion makes clear that the Fraud Division will use every available legal tool to identify, investigate, and prosecute offenses against the American people.” – DOJ statement
📺 FLASHBACK: The strike force program was previously expanded to states including California, Arizona, and Minnesota, following major health care fraud enforcement actions involving a minimum over $21 billion in alleged losses in recent years.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice announced the expansion of its Health Care Fraud Strike Force to Philadelphia, with 19 defendants charged in schemes involving over $4 million in fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid claims.

show more

Chairman of Farage’s Reform Party Stopped From Reporting on Migrant Crisis by Armed Police.

Reform UK Chairman Lee Anderson was blocked from investigating migrant boat crossings to England from the French coastline.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Reform UK Chairman Lee Anderson said he was stopped by heavily armed French police during an early morning visit to Loon-Plage in northern France on Tuesday, claiming officers checked identification and prevented his team from accessing the beach minutes after they arrived for a fact-finding mission on small boat crossings.
📺 DETAIL: Anderson contrasted the police response to him with their often weak or non-existent response to illegal migrants gathering on the French beaches to launch boats toward Britain in an interview with the British media. After visiting a migrant camp between Calais and Dunkirk, he described the conditions as squalid, and questioned why migrants would prefer this situation to simply claiming asylum in France. Anderson also defended Reform’s proposal to use the Royal Navy to intercept migrant boats in the English Channel, arguing these would be lawful rescue missions to return migrants sailing in dangerous conditions to France, permissible under international law. He also criticized French authorities, noting they have already received the equivalent of nearly $1.35 billion from British taxpayers to help curb illegal Channel crossings and should cooperate with any return efforts if they are serious about ending the crisis.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “[W]ithin minutes, the French police, armed to the teeth, turned up with the tear gas on and asked what we’re doing… I thought my word, if only they could be so proactive when the illegal migrants are trying to jump on a dinghy and get to the UK?” – Lee Anderson
🎯 IMPACT: Anderson’s criticism highlights ongoing tensions between Britain and France over handling illegal Channel crossings, with the British government paying the French government hundreds of millions of pounds to police their beaches for years with decidedly limited results.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Reform UK Chairman Lee Anderson was blocked from investigating migrant boat crossings to England from the French coastline.

show more

Labour’s Channel Crisis Escalates as Massive Migrant Boat Catches Fire and Sinks.

A major rescue operation saved 157 migrants after a massive dinghy caught fire and sank in the English Channel, highlighting Britain’s ongoing challenges with illegal crossings.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A major air and sea rescue operation unfolded in the English Channel early Tuesday after a massive migrant dinghy caught fire and sank, sending 157 illegal migrants into the water. British and French rescue vessels responded to a distress call around 6 AM and pulled everyone from the sea, with several people treated for hypothermia, but no fatalities or serious injuries reported. Maritime officials described the outcome as “miraculous,” crediting the rapid joint response by Britain’s Border Security Command, the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), and French rescue services.
📺 DETAIL: The vessel, believed to be one of the largest migrant dinghies used for a Channel crossing, had reportedly departed from near Dieppe, France, and spent more than 18 hours at sea before its engine failed and caught fire. Authorities said people-smuggling networks are increasingly using larger inflatable boats and launching from ports farther south to evade border enforcement. Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage said the incident demonstrated the need for tougher action, pointing to his party’s proposed “Operation Fortress” plan to intercept and return migrant boats using the Royal Navy.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Quite frankly, it’s miraculous that no one has died, although searches in the area have been continuing.” – Maritime security source
🎯 IMPACT: The incident highlights the life-threatening risks of illegal Channel crossings and the increasing use of overcrowded “mega-dinghies” by people smugglers. Despite prior promises by Britain’s Labour Party government to end the crisis, illegal crossings of the Channel have worsened since they entered office in 2024.

Image by Acabashi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A major rescue operation saved 157 migrants after a massive dinghy caught fire and sank in the English Channel, highlighting Britain's ongoing challenges with illegal crossings.

show more

Spanish Official Fired for Leaking Migrant Invasion Data.

A Spanish civil servant was dismissed after publishing accurate data on the record-breaking migrant invasion into Ceuta, a Spanish exclave in North Africa, sparking criticism and public backlash.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A Spanish government official was fired for issuing an alert after tens of thousands of illegal migrants breached the city of Ceuta’s border with Morocco.
📺 DETAIL: A staff member of Spain’s Department of National Security (DSN), roughly equivalent to the United States’ National Security Council, was fired after publishing an alert detailing the surge of illegal migrants into Ceuta, a Spanish city in North Africa, from Morocco. The alert was issued on Thursday and deleted soon after. The alert warned Spaniards that roughly 49,000 illegal migrants from Morocco had rushed the Spanish border, a figure that later rose to around 70,000. The alert described the incident as “the worst migrant crisis registered in the city since May 2021.” The unnamed former staffer, who had worked at the DSN since 2018, was fired over the phone. The information about the illegal migrant surge at Ceuta was allegedly “not meant to be public, as it was intended solely for internal use,” according to Spanish media. “Despite the government’s lack of foresight, the only person dismissed was the civil servant. And this, even though the data she released was accurate,” stated online outlet El Español. The dismissal process was reportedly unusually abrupt, bypassing typical protocols for reassigning officials to their original departments. “According to the same sources, that department had not been formally notified of her dismissal,” wrote ABC, a Spanish daily newspaper.
🎯 IMPACT: The migrant crisis has overwhelmed Ceuta. Estimates suggest that the border surge doubled the city’s population. This unprecedented event has raised questions about Spain’s commitment to border security, especially since the far-left Spanish government of Pedro Sánchez granted mass amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants earlier this year. This decision similarly led to an anticipated collapse in social services. European Union leaders are set to discuss the Spanish crisis at an emergency meeting in the coming weeks.
📺 FLASHBACK: Following the border surge, thousands of illegal migrants remain in Ceuta, including hundreds setting up camp on the local beach. As a result, public services have collapsed, and public spaces have been occupied. “Morocco has shown us that it isn’t reliable. There’s no alternative but to put in place whatever means are necessary to ensure it cannot do this again,” said Juan Jesus Vivas, Mayor-President of Ceuta. The city, just eight miles from mainland Spain, has been Spanish since the 1500s, and was Portuguese prior to that. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Spanish civil servant was dismissed after publishing accurate data on the record-breaking migrant invasion into Ceuta, a Spanish exclave in North Africa, sparking criticism and public backlash.

show more