A federal appeals court has upheld Florida’s law restricting children from attending sexualized drag performances, marking a significant legal victory for child protection advocates.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A federal appeals court has upheld Florida‘s 2023 Protection of Children Act, ruling 8-5 that the state can prohibit minors from attending adult live performances deemed obscene for children, including certain sexualized drag shows. The full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned both a lower court injunction and an earlier three-judge panel decision that had blocked enforcement of the law after Orlando’s Hamburger Mary’s Restaurant and Bar challenged it. 📺 DETAIL: Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher said the law constitutionally advances Florida’s interest in protecting minors from obscene performances, emphasizing that the Constitution does not protect obscenity. The law defines prohibited performances as those depicting or simulating nudity, sexual conduct, lewd behavior, or the lewd display of prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts, and makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly admit a child to such events, carrying penalties of up to one year in jail and a $10,000 fine. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier welcomed the ruling, calling it a major victory after three years of litigation. In a dissent joined by four judges, U.S. Circuit Judge Robin Rosenbaum argued the law was designed to discourage drag performances and could chill constitutionally protected speech. 💬 KEY QUOTE: “Preventing children from attending adult live performances obscene for them is rationally related to Florida’s interest in safeguarding the well-being of minors.” – Judge Andrew Brasher, writing for the majority 🎯 IMPACT: Florida joins Arkansas, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas in banning minors from adult live performances, setting a precedent for other states aiming to shield children from explicit content. The ruling reinforces the state’s ability to regulate obscenity while dismissing concerns that the law infringes on First Amendment rights. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
