A tribunal in Scotland has awarded thousands in compensation to an American pizzeria worker after ruling that being called a “Yank” amounted to racial harassment.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A court in the United Kingdom has ruled that the term “Yank,” a long-standing nickname for Americans, constitutes racial harassment. 📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, it was reported that a Scottish court had ruled that the term “Yank,” derived from the term “Yankee,” is a form of racial harassment. The court ruled that a man, Michael Tortolano, had used the term while insulting his American co-worker, Raymond Joseph, during a workplace dispute. Both men worked at a Pizza Express branch in Aberdeen, Scotland. The dispute took place last year. As a result of the ruling, Joseph received £5,000 (~$6,726) in compensation. According to the work tribunal, Joseph claimed that one of the managers disliked him since he began working at the branch in 2024. Specifically, Joseph claimed he was targeted for minor infractions, had his tips reduced, and was subjected to other offensive remarks. 💬 KEY QUOTE: “Go back to your country, you f*****g Yank.” – Michael Tortolano to Raymond Joseph 🎯 IMPACT: This ruling underscores the broad interpretation of racial harassment in Britain. Many have criticized the ruling as “Yank” is generally a neutral, often affectionate nickname for Americans. The ruling also has implications for free speech in the workplace. This is far from the only controversial ruling in Britain related to free speech. In Scotland specifically, free speech is especially under threat. Back in 2024, it was reported that Scottish police were focusing a considerable amount of time and resources on policing “hate speech” rather than serious crimes. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
b.jpg){kind=link}
