Tuesday, March 31, 2026

UK Govt Suspends Elected Member Who Criticized the End of the Right to Jury Trials.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Karl Turner, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Britain’s governing Labour Party, was suspended after criticizing government plans to scrap jury trials.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Karl Turner, Labour Chief Whip Jonathan Reynolds, and Labour Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The suspension was communicated in recent days in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am being told that I have had the whip suspended but I have not had any notification from the whips about this.” – Karl Turner

🎯IMPACT: The suspension highlights internal tensions within Labour over its controversial plans to scrap most jury trials.

IN FULL

Karl Turner, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Britain’s governing Labour Party, critical of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to scrap most trials by jury, has had the party whip suspended. The lawmaker stated, “I am being told that I have had the whip suspended but I have not had any notification from the whips about this. It seems journalists have been told but I have not.”

The Labour MP has been a prominent critic of Starmer’s plans to restrict jury trials to the most serious offenses. Turner has attributed his opposition to scrapping jury trials to his own acquittal by a jury after being falsely accused of a crime.

Turner, a barrister, previously criticized the decision to scrap jury trials as “undemocratic”. He also suggested David Lammy, who serves as Starmer’s Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Justice, was being “untruthful” when the latter said the decision was about fixing Britain’s backlog of legal casework.

Turner has also raised questions regarding the theft of a cell phone belonging to Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. The phone reportedly contained potentially sensitive messages to Lord Peter Mandelson, Starmer’s now-former ambassador to the U.S., who was appointed despite his known connections to deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 

Mandelson has since been arrested following revelations in the Epstein Files suggesting he leaked confidential information to Epstein while serving in the Cabinet of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. 

Image by Chris McAndrew.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Tyler Robinson’s Attorneys Continue Delay Tactics in Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, charged with the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk, have requested a delay in the preliminary hearing, citing what they claim is inconclusive bullet analysis results from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tyler Robinson, 22, is charged with the murder of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors and defense attorneys are disputing evidence in the case.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The assassination occurred in September 2025 at Utah Valley University. Robinson is due back in court on April 17 for a hearing on a defense motion.

🎯IMPACT: Despite the defense claims about the bullet fragments, prosecutors note that Robinson’s DNA has been found on the rifle’s trigger, on the spent cartridge casing, and on two unspent casings found at the scene.

IN FULL

Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, 22, the man charged with the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder and conservative organizer Charlie Kirk, are now requesting a delay in the May preliminary hearing. They cite what they call an inconclusive report from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) regarding the bullet recovered during Kirk’s autopsy and a rifle found near the scene.

Importantly, the ATF report—which has yet to be released to the public—appears to be inconclusive because the bullet itself shattered after striking Kirk in the neck and subsequently hitting materials behind the TPUSA founder. Currently, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is analyzing the lead composition of the bullet fragments, which will provide further clarity on the bullet’s origins.

Notably, prosecutors have already submitted evidence that shows DNA found on the trigger of the rifle used to assassinate Kirk matches Tyler Robinson, along with the DNA found on the spent cartridge casing, and two unfired cartridges. Still, the defense attorneys from Robinson—possibly hoping to confuse potential jurors ahead of jury selection—claim that the forensic analysis shows multiple sets of DNA on the rifle. This would be expected of a weapon that was used or handled by several individuals over time. However, the defense has not explained Robinson’s DNA being found on the spent and unspent cartridges.

The defense team for Robinson has been accused of employing a number of delay tactics to drag out the trial, while fomenting conspiracy theories. Despite their demands for further DNA and forensic analysis, much of the evidence points to Robinson—including text messages from Robinson to his transgender lover, Lance Twiggs, in which he admits to the killing and states he’d “had enough of [Kirk’s] hatred.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

The U.S. National Gas Price Hit Mid Biden-Era Levels Today.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. gas prices have hit their highest level since the middle of former President Joe Biden’s term. According to AAA’s national average gasoline price, the cost per gallon hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former President Joe Biden, President Donald J. Trump, American consumers, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Saudi Arabia.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The price per gallon of gasoline hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

🎯IMPACT: The last time the average price per gallon of gasoline crossed $4.00 was in August 2022, after reaching over $5.00 in June of that year.

IN FULL

U.S. gas prices have hit their highest level since the middle of former President Joe Biden‘s term. According to AAA’s national average gasoline price, the cost per gallon hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

The last time the average price per gallon of gasoline crossed $4.00 was in August 2022, after reaching over $5.00 in June of that year. Notably, the spike in prices at the time was due to the sidelining of refinery workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent surge in gasoline demand when pandemic restrictions were lifted—creating an environment of low supply and sustained high consumer demand.

In the current environment, the price spike is directly tied to the ongoing U.S. military operation against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Sporadic Iranian attacks on oil tankers and fears over the possible laying of sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz have resulted in Lloyd’s of London essentially suspending insurance for international shipping moving through the critical waterway. This has effectively closed off oil and gas shipments from Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and—in part—Saudi Arabia to the rest of the world.

Concerningly, the sudden drop in global oil output due to the closure of the strait has left Europe, Asia, and Australia facing a fuel and energy crisis, with emergency reserves quickly running out. The global nature of oil pricing also means the United States—a net oil exporter—is not unaffected by the price spike. For President Donald J. Trump, the price surge has played a significant part in his collapsing voter approval numbers.

America exports most of its high-value “light sweet crude,” which fetches top dollar on international markets, and imports heavier, less expensive “heavy sour crude.” It should be noted that American refineries are designed to handle heavy sour crude, and not light sweet crude, and that the exchange is ultimately more profitable for the United States.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Says U.S. Will Abandon Efforts to Reopen Hormuz ‘At Some Point’ But ‘Not Quite Yet.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump stated he is not ready to abandon efforts to force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, despite suggesting allies should take more responsibility.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, the U.S. military, Iran, and allied nations, including the U.K. and NATO members.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s remarks were made during an interview on March 31, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “At some point I will, not quite yet. But countries have to come in and take care of it.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: President Trump emphasized the need for allied nations to take a more active role, while reiterating the U.S. military’s progress in the region.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump said Tuesday morning that he is not ready “quite yet” to abandon U.S. military efforts to force the Islamic Republic of Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, despite a Truth Social post suggesting that allies need to take responsibility. He expressed frustration that other countries, including the United Kingdom and other NATO members, had not sent military assets to support the U.S. military operation against Iran.

“At some point I will, not quite yet,” President Trump said regarding the possibility of the U.S. removing its presence around the Strait of Hormuz. “But countries have to come in and take care of it. Iran has been decimated, but they’re going to have to come in and do their own work.”

The President again emphasized, “I’ll be there, but if they’re having a hard time getting oil, let them come and take it like they’re supposed to. Let them come up and take it. They didn’t want to give a hand to anybody. NATO is terrible, and they’re all terrible.”

When pressed on the U.S. timeline in Iran, Trump stated, “We are two weeks ahead of schedule.” However, the President initially laid out a four-to-eight-week operation, and we’re currently in week five of military strikes against the Islamic Republic. “Iran has no military might anymore. They are down on everything they had. They’re a mess,” Trump added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Tells UK: ‘USA Won’t Help You Anymore’ After Iran War Rejection.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump urged America’s allies to reopen the Strait of Hormuz themselves amid soaring oil prices.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the British government and other allied governments, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, and the Iranian regime.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 31, 2026, concerning events in the Strait of Hormuz.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Global oil prices have soared as a result of Iran closing the strait; the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned the British economy is “especially exposed”.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has told the United Kingdom to “get your own oil” and called on America’s allies to step up and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!”

The President criticized Britain in particular for doing little while Iran’s closure of the vital shipping route has driven oil prices sharply higher. “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!”

The hostile message comes at an inopportune moment, as a state visit by King Charles III to the U.S. has just been confirmed, despite opposition from many Britons. Recent tracker polls show over 80 percent of Britons have an unfavorable opinion of the U.S. leader, and only eight percent of Britons support joining offensive operations against Iran.

Trump said Britain and other allies should now either buy oil from the United States or find the resolve to secure the strait themselves. “All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you,” he stated. “Number 1, buy from the US, we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT.”

War Secretary Pete Hegseth backed the President’s message, calling for broader international involvement to clear the waterway. “It’s not just the U.S. Navy, last time I checked there was meant to be a big, bad Royal Navy to help as well,” Hegseth told reporters.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Republicans Are Leaving Congress in Numbers Not Seen Since 1930 – Here’s Why…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A near record number of Republican lawmakers in the modern political era are retiring from Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. As of the end of March, seven Republicans have announced they will not seek reelection to the U.S. Senate, while a whopping 37 Republicans are forgoing reelection to the House of Representatives.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: House Republicans, House Democrats, Senate Republicans, Senate Democrats, President Donald J. Trump, and American voters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The 2026 midterm elections will take place on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.

🎯IMPACT: While some retirements are explainable by advanced age and health issues, as in the case of Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), they are, on the whole, a foreboding signal that the GOP anticipates losing control of at least one chamber of Congress, and perhaps both.

fast
IN FULL

A near-record number of Republican lawmakers in the modern political era are retiring from Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, an exclusive analysis from The National Pulse can reveal.

As of the end of March, seven Republicans have announced they will not seek reelection to the U.S. Senate, while 37 Republicans are forgoing reelection to the House of Representatives. While some retirements are explainable by advanced age and health, as in the case of Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), they are, on the whole, a foreboding signal that the GOP anticipates losing control of at least one chamber of Congress and perhaps both.

Earlier this month, Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) became the 36th Republican in the House to announce he will not seek reelection. The 72-year-old Issa is an example of a trend particular to House Republicans, in which senior lawmakers retire ahead of what they believe will be a bad election cycle that will prevent them from being elevated to a committee chairmanship.

Similar to Issa, Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO)—a 25-year incumbent and chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee—announced late last week that he will not seek reelection, marking the 37th retirement. Graves, who is 62, is another example of a senior Republican House member whose decision to exit Congress likely revolves around the politics of committee chairmanships. Meanwhile, Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) was forced into retirement after losing his primary race on March 3.

EXPECTING TO LOSE, AND FAILING TO REDISTRICT.

House Republicans have traditionally imposed term limits on their committee chairs, which forces senior lawmakers to rotate through various committees. When they believe the party will be out of the majority for at least one election cycle, these senior members will often opt for retirement since it could be a number of years before the GOP returns to the majority and they are rotated back in as a committee chairman.

The high number of House retirements—which appears to be the most in a single cycle since 1930—is at least in part explained by the committee chairmanship dynamic. However, it also likely reflects the anticipation of further Republican losses due to the failure of several states to shore up the narrow majority through mid-decade redistricting. Efforts to draw new district lines in states like Indiana failed to be adopted despite a concerted push by President Donald J. Trump, with Texas being the most successful redistricting plan, increasing Republican House margins by a significant number. Other GOP redistricting plans adopted in North Carolina, Missouri, and Ohio could add one Republican seat each, while Utah’s attempt to draw a more favorable Republican congressional map has languished amid court challenges.

The last time the GOP saw a similar number of retirements was during the 2018 midterm election cycle, when 34 House members retired. Subsequently, Democrats took the House majority, picking up 41 seats. Democrat redistricting efforts in California alone will likely net the Democrats five seats in that state.

TROUBLE IN THE SENATE?

The Senate retirements should also be of concern.

Currently, seven Republican lawmakers in the upper chamber have announced they will not seek reelection. Critically for the GOP, the only seat expected to be hotly contested is in North Carolina, which is being vacated by anti-Trump Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC). The open seat will see former RNC co-chairman Michael Whatley face off against former Governor Roy Cooper (D-NC). Iowa will also have an open Senate race with the retirement of Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA).

The other Senate retirements include Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)—the former Republican Senate leader and outspoken critic of President Trump—who is 84 years old and has suffered a significant decline in his physical and cognitive health in recent years. Joining McConnell in not seeking reelection is Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), who is 71 years old. Lumis’s retirement decision appears mostly influenced by her legislative efforts in support of cryptocurrency, with political speculation suggesting she intends to cash in on that influence as a lobbyist for the industry.

While the technical number of retirements is seven, Sen. Alan Armstrong (R-OK)—who was appointed earlier this week to fill the seat held by now-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin—is barred under Oklahoma law from running in November’s election due to his appointment. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK), who announced he will run for the seat, has already received backing from President Trump and is expected to easily win the race.

Another departure is Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), though the former Auburn University football coach is instead running for Governor of Alabama and not exiting politics. Similarly, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) is running for governor of her state.

However, the most surprising has been Sen. Steve Daines’s (R-MT) retirement announcement. At 63, Daines is just under the median age for a Republican senator, which currently sits at 64.5. Notably, Daines led the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) efforts during the 2024 election cycle, which saw Republicans capture the Senate majority and pick up critical seats in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Montana—with razor-thin losses in Wisconsin and Michigan.

VOTER DATA IS BLEAK.

Polling data continues to show voters believe the Trump administration is too focused on foreign policy and not doing enough to address domestic matters. The economy is of particular concern, along with renewed inflation fears—though the latter is primarily driven by pressure on housing and energy affordability.

While several recent surveys have shown Republican candidates remaining competitive with Democrats on the generic Congressional ballot, record-low approval ratings for President Trump could have a downward drag, swinging close races toward Democrat candidates. This has become especially evident in a slew of off-year and special elections, in which the Democrat Party has largely won, with its candidates overperforming and Republicans underperforming prior election cycle results.

Image by Ted Eytan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Charges Nine in $1.1 Million Massachusetts Benefit Fraud Scheme.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Nine individuals were charged in a federal crackdown on benefit fraud schemes exploiting stolen identities to steal from taxpayer-funded programs.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The defendants include both U.S. citizens and illegal aliens, with charges involving multiple federal and state agencies.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The charges were made over nine weeks in Massachusetts, and investigations into the fraud began in December 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The accused allegedly used stolen identities belonging to U.S. citizens from Puerto Rico to steal more than $1.1 million in taxpayer-funded programs.” – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

🎯IMPACT: The alleged fraud led to nearly $9 million in uncovered benefit fraud and significant financial losses to public assistance programs.

IN FULL

A coordinated federal crackdown in Massachusetts has resulted in charges against nine suspects for social welfare benefit fraud schemes exploiting stolen identities. The schemes targeted taxpayer-funded programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), MassHealth, and Social Security benefits. The investigation, ongoing since December 2025, uncovered nearly $9 million in fraudulent activity.

“We are working hand-in-hand with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts and our other partners to identify, investigate, and to bring to justice those who perpetrate fraud against our taxpayer-funded benefit programs,” said Michael J. Krol, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in New England, of the anti-fraud operation. He added, “We will continue every day in this fight until we bring those responsible to justice.”

Notably, the defendants, including illegal immigrants and U.S. citizens, used stolen identities primarily from U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico. These identities were utilized to obtain government-issued identification, including Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles-issued driver’s licenses and U.S. passports, which were then used to fraudulently access public benefits.

The charged individuals include Juan Felipe Chalas, Efrain Rivera, Danis Piron Lara, Erpawi Roque Collado, John Doe, a.k.a. Wilkin Emilio Pimental Pereyra, another unidentified John Doe, Mercedes Soto Capellan, Oscar Gonzalez Melo, and Cruz Augusta Pena Arias. Their charges range from aggravated identity theft to making false statements in passport applications.

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the accused allegedly stole over $1.1 million in taxpayer-funded programs. The schemes resulted in approximately $943,197 in total losses to public assistance programs, including SNAP, MassHealth, and Social Security benefits.

The penalties for the charges include up to 20 years in prison for unlawfully obtaining SNAP benefits, mandatory consecutive sentences for aggravated identity theft, up to a five-year sentence for the misuse of a Social Security number, and 10 years for the theft of government property.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Newsom and the California Democrats Are Killing Los Angeles.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Tens of thousands of residents are leaving Los Angeles County, with the region recording the largest population drop in the nation between July 2024 and July 2025, according to new U.S. Census Bureau data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Residents of Los Angeles County, neighboring counties such as Riverside and San Bernardino, and demographers analyzing U.S. Census Bureau data.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Between July 2024 and July 2025, primarily in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas in California, with the data released in March 2026.

🎯IMPACT: The population decline could lead to worker shortages, rising costs, and slower economic growth, with ripple effects on California’s labor market and economy.

IN FULL

Los Angeles County, California, has seen a significant population decline, with roughly 54,000 residents leaving between July 2024 and July 2025, according to newly released U.S. Census Bureau data. Once home to over 10 million people in 2020, the county’s population has now dropped below 9.7 million.

Neighboring regions, including Riverside and San Bernardino counties, gained more than 21,000 residents during the same period, while the Las Vegas metro area attracted over 20,000 people. However, even more troubling for Los Angeles County is that the rate of outmigration is not being offset by new residents relocating to the area—a trend that, over the long term, could severely undermine the local tax base.

Notably, the uptick in the exodus of Los Angeles County residents came as the region was devastated by wildfires in early 2025. The lack of response from city, county, and state officials—including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA)—led to 12 people killed in Pacific Palisades and another 18 in Altadena. Over 6,000 homes and buildings were destroyed, including properties owned by high-profile figures such as Paris Hilton, Tom Hanks, and Mandy Moore. The National Pulse reported in October last year that 29-year-old Jonathan Rinderknecht was arrested for setting the Pacific Palisades fire.

Meanwhile, California as a whole is grappling with population declines, with 30 out of 58 counties losing residents in 2025. A sharp drop in foreign immigrants has been a major factor, with San Diego County alone experiencing a 65 percent year-over-year decrease in foreign arrivals. This drop coincides with President Donald J. Trump’s federal crackdown on illegal immigration and ramp-up of security at the U.S. southern border.

Since 2010, nearly ten million residents have left California, with many citing the state’s housing affordability crisis, violent crime, and declining quality of life issues like rampant drug use and homelessness. The state has also come under increasing federal scrutiny for social services fraud. State auditors previously identified billions of dollars in fraudulent unemployment insurance claims and improper pandemic relief payments.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

BREAKING: Palm Beach Airport Renamed for Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill to rename Palm Beach International Airport.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor Ron DeSantis and the Florida state legislature.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 30, 2026, in Florida.

💬KEY QUOTE: The airport will be renamed to President Donald J. Trump International Airport.

🎯IMPACT: The change is set to take effect on July 1, 2026, pending FAA approval.

IN FULL

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has approved House Bill 919, which will rename Palm Beach International Airport to President Donald J. Trump International Airport. The approval was given on March 30, 2026.

The change is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026, but is subject to approval from the Federal Aviation Administration and a name-use agreement.

The Florida state legislature had passed the bill earlier in February, paving the way for the renaming process to begin.

Supporters of the renaming argue that it honors President Trump’s impact on the state and the nation. The airport is located in a region where Trump has strong ties, notably his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Resumes Asylum Processing After 5-Month Pause.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has lifted its total ban on reviewing asylum applications, though restrictions remain for around 40 countries.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: DHS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The pause was implemented in November 2025 following a deadly attack on the National Guard in Washington, D.C., by an Afghan national.

💬KEY QUOTE: “USCIS has lifted the adjudicative hold for thoroughly screened asylum seekers from non-high-risk countries.” – DHS spokesman.

🎯IMPACT: The move reallocates resources to focus on national security and public safety vetting for higher-risk cases.

IN FULL

The Trump administration has moved to lift the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) hold on reviewing asylum applications, though the department stresses that restrictions continue to remain in place for around 40 countries of particular national security concern. In November last year, President Donald J. Trump directed DHS to impose a pause on processing asylum claims after an Afghan national shot two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., killing one.

At the time, then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem indicated the pause in reviews would be indefinite as the department worked through a backlog of nearly four million asylum cases. Importantly, the hold on reviews continues to apply to countries deemed “high risk,” including Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and multiple African nations.

“USCIS has lifted the adjudicative hold for thoroughly screened asylum seekers from non-high-risk countries,” a DHS spokesman said on Monday, adding, “This move allows resources to focus on continued rigorous national security and public safety vetting for higher-risk cases.”

Importantly, other restrictions remain in effect, such as the pause on issuing immigrant visas to 75 countries and the halt of immigration applications from nations covered by President Trump’s travel ban. Late last year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began a re-review of foreign nationals granted refugee status by the former Biden government, applying more rigorous scrutiny to the applicants. A number of these individuals have subsequently been referred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more