❓WHAT HAPPENED: Plans to scrap jury trials for most cases in Britain cleared a key hurdle as Members of Parliament (MPs) advanced the legislation to the next stage.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Justice Secretary David Lammy, Labour MPs, and the Bar Council.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday, in the British Parliament.
💬KEY QUOTE: “There is very little evidence to support even basic rationality of the government’s decision to rush through this legislation which unnecessarily removes jury trials from thousands of people.” – Kirsty Brimelow KC, Bar Council
🎯IMPACT: The legislation could end the right to jury trials for cases with sentences of three years or less, despite significant legal and political opposition.
The far-left British government’s scheme to dramatically limit the right to trial by jury cleared a key hurdle in Parliament on Tuesday after Members of Parliament (MPs) voted to move the legislation to the next stage of the legislative process. The controversial reform, introduced by anti-Trump Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy, would represent a significant shift in England and Wales’ legal system, with defendants facing a potential prison sentence of three years or less no longer being entitled to a jury trial. Instead, a single judge would determine guilt or innocence.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party government argues the change is necessary to tackle the growing backlog in Britain’s courts. “To restore swift and fair justice, we are pulling every lever available, investment is essential, modernisation is essential, and reform,” Lammy said.
The measure passed its reading by 304 votes to 203, but exposed divisions within the governing Labour Party. Ten Labour MPs voted against the bill, while around 90 abstained.
The proposal has also drawn strong opposition from the legal community. More than 3,200 lawyers, supported by the Bar Council, signed a letter urging the government to abandon the plan. Kirsty Brimelow KC, chair of the Bar Council, warned: “There is very little evidence to support even basic rationality of the government’s decision to rush through this legislation which unnecessarily removes jury trials from thousands of people. It’s not too late for the government to listen to us as experts and as a profession and stop before bulldozing our jury system.”
Critics argue the reforms could undermine one of the most important safeguards in the British legal tradition, which has relied on juries for centuries to ensure defendants are judged by their peers rather than solely by the state.
The debate comes amid broader controversy concerning changes to the British justice system. In 2025, new Ministry of Justice guidance advised courts to consider factors such as ethnicity, gender, and identity when making certain bail and sentencing decisions, prompting critics to warn that the policy risked creating a “two-tier” system skewed against straight white men.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.