The Department of Justice has determined that UCLA’s medical school prioritized racial demographics over merit in its admissions process, violating federal law.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded that the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) engaged in racial discrimination during its admissions process, allegedly favoring black and Hispanic applicants over white and Asian candidates despite federal and state bans on race-based admissions 📺 DETAIL: In a findings letter released Tuesday, the DOJ said its yearlong civil rights investigation uncovered communications among UCLA officials discussing ways to preserve diversity goals despite the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against affirmative action. The department found some admitted minority applicants had lower academic metrics than rejected applicants from other racial groups and accused the school of using essay prompts and other criteria as indirect racial proxies. Federal officials said they are seeking a “voluntary resolution agreement” with the university and have not announced charges or penalties. UCLA responded by claiming that its admissions system is merit-based and said it is reviewing the DOJ’s findings. The investigation is part of a broader Trump administration effort to challenge diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at universities nationwide. 💬 KEY QUOTE: “UCLA’s admissions process has been focused on racial demographics at the expense of merit and excellence—allowing racial politics to distract the school from the vital work of training great doctors.” – Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon. 🎯 IMPACT: The findings cast doubt on the integrity of UCLA’s admissions process and its commitment to merit-based selection, raising broader concerns about compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action. 📺 FLASHBACK: In 2023, the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in college admissions through its decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, emphasizing the unconstitutionality of race-based preferences. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less