Thursday, August 20, 2026

Surrogate Sued by Biological Parents for Refusing to Abort Baby.

A California couple is suing their surrogate for breach of contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas so the infant could receive life-saving care.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A California couple is suing their surrogate, McKenna West, for allegedly violating a contract by refusing to kill their unborn baby after doctors diagnosed him with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed are seeking more than $100,000 in damages, arguing that West agreed to an abortion clause covering serious fetal abnormalities when they paid her $60,000 to carry the child.
📺 DETAIL: West, a 28-year-old nurse from Alaska, rejected the couple’s demand after the 20-week scan and moved to Texas, where she sought to protect the pregnancy and find medical care for the baby. She later secured court intervention in Dallas that ensured the child would receive medically necessary treatment, although she was barred from having contact with him following his birth. The baby, born August 12 and named Rumi by his biological parents, has since undergone a major surgery used to treat hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and remains in critical but stable condition, according to his parents’ attorney. West’s attorney said she is preparing her own legal action seeking to establish parental rights, arguing that Texas law recognizes the woman who gives birth as the child’s parent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “She is seeking parentage of the child because she gave birth in Texas, and in Texas, if you give birth to a child, it’s your child.” – Lincoln Wilson, McKenna West’s attorney
🎯 IMPACT: The lawsuit highlights the complex legal and ethical conflicts that can arise when parents who pay surrogates to carry their children insist on so-called abortion clauses and attempt to enforce them. The case could have broader implications for surrogacy contracts, parental rights, and how courts handle disputes involving surrogate parents.
📺 FLASHBACK: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the baby’s condition, has seen significant success rates with early surgical intervention, with some hospitals reporting 100 percent success for the initial procedure. This medical context played a key role in West’s decision to carry her pregnancy to term.

Image by SHYCITYNikon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A California couple is suing their surrogate for breach of contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas so the infant could receive life-saving care.

show more

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Arrested for Fatal Stabbing of Virginia Mom.

An illegal alien previously released into the U.S. by Border Patrol under Joe Biden is accused of killing a Virginia mother near a jogging trail.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A Salvadoran national accused of fatally stabbing a Virginia mother had previously been apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol and released into the country under former President Joe Biden, according to a federal source. Alexis Antonio Cedillos-Campos was arrested on Wednesday in connection with the death of 42-year-old Carmen Lizet Puch, who was found dead Monday morning near Difficult Run Park in Great Falls, Virginia, after being stabbed and doused in gasoline. Federal sources told Melugin that Cedillos-Campos was apprehended by Border Patrol in El Paso, Texas, in April 2024 but subsequently released into the U.S. interior.
📺 DETAIL: Puch, a Reston resident and mother of a young daughter, was discovered near her car shortly before 7 AM after suffering trauma to her upper body, and police classified the case as a stabbing homicide. Investigators allege Cedillos-Campos and Puch had worked together at a Herndon restaurant and had an intimate relationship. Authorities say the suspect left the restaurant carrying a large knife, latex gloves, and a water bottle before traveling to the park. Police allege Cedillos-Campos repeatedly stabbed Puch, poured gasoline on her, and attempted to set her on fire before later confessing to the killing. The case comes amid renewed scrutiny of violent crimes involving Salvadoran nationals in the United States, including cases involving Salvadoran migrants accused or convicted of sexual assault and murder.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I’m told by [a] federal source that the suspect… is a Salvadoran illegal alien who was caught and released at the border by the Biden admin in El Paso, TX in April 2024.” – Bill Melugin
🎯 IMPACT: The case is likely to intensify criticism of the Biden government’s “catch and release” policies, which President Donald J. Trump ended following his return to the White House.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An illegal alien previously released into the U.S. by Border Patrol under Joe Biden is accused of killing a Virginia mother near a jogging trail.

show more

Prosecutors Raise Comey’s Crime Novel About Using Coded Messages to Incite Murder in ‘8647’ Case.

Federal prosecutors allege that a social media post by former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey constituted a coded threat against President Donald J. Trump

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Federal prosecutors have accused James Comey of making a “true threat” against President Donald J. Trump, citing the former FBI chief’s own crime novel against him.
📺 DETAIL: Comey’s book, titled FDR Drive, was released shortly after his infamous “8647” Instagram post. The post showed seashells arranged into the number. “86” is mob slang for “get rid of” or “kill,” while “47” is a reference to President Trump as the 47th President of the United States. According to documents filed on Tuesday, the book’s plot revolves around a prosecutor targeting a “far-right wing media personality” whose enemies are killed after coded messages are posted online. “[H]e singled out his enemies by name and suggested ‘something should be done’ about them,” read the filed documents. Prosecutors argue that the parallels between the novel’s plot and the post show that Comey was making a coded and intentional threat against the President. “Comey published a novel where the antagonist successfully persuades his followers to kill his political rivals by communicating coded messages online,” prosecutors argued.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Comey published a novel where the antagonist successfully persuades his followers to kill his political rivals by communicating coded messages online. Needless to say, Comey does not and could not point to similar evidence in any comparator case—let alone a threat against the sitting President of the United States.” – Federal prosecutors’ filing
🎯 IMPACT: Comey has pleaded not guilty. While the former FBI chief’s claim that he was unaware of the violent implications of his Instagram post, the plot of his book shows an awareness of how coded online messaging can be used to encourage political violence. This follows revelations earlier this month that the FBI covertly investigated the President on false allegations of being a Russian asset even after Comey was dismissed from his position. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Federal prosecutors allege that a social media post by former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey constituted a coded threat against President Donald J. Trump

show more

Retired Cop Fined for Joking About Islamic Prophet’s Marriage to a Child.

A British retiree has been fined for joking about the Islamic prophet’s marriage to a child on social media, spotlighting the United Kingdom’s censorious laws against “grossly offensive” communications.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  A retired County Durham, England, police officer is appealing a conviction and £1,000 (~$1,350) fine after being prosecuted for social media post that a judge ruled was “grossly offensive.” Stephen Gray, 65, was initially investigated after a neighbor reported two Facebook posts.
📺 DETAIL: Gray was acquitted over the first post, which combined a call for “mass deportation” with a satirical claim about a migrant seeking accommodation with better amenities and a halal menu. The second post, which joked, “Fun facts about Bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9-year-old!” led to his conviction under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it an offense to send a message over a public electronic communications network that is “grossly offensive” or indecent, obscene, or menacing. Gray said the post was intended as satire and was meant to encourage discussion about the marriage of the Islamic prophet, Mohammed, to a young child, and child marriage in Muslim-majority countries generally. District Judge Steven Hood ruled that the post was designed to be offensive and was not capable of being interpreted seriously because it was presented as a joke. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had initially determined there was no realistic prospect of conviction and declined to prosecute, but the neighbor who informed on Gray requested a review through the Victims’ Right to Review scheme.
🎯 IMPACT: The case will intensify concerns over how broadly England and Wales’ communications laws are being applied to online speech, particularly when political, social, or religious sensitivities are involved, rendering freedom of speech a dead letter. Gray’s appeal in November may help clarify where courts should draw the line between legitimate satire and what the British state regards as criminally offensive speech.
📺 FLASHBACK: Section 127 of the Communications Act has been criticized in the past for its broad and subjective definition of “grossly offensive” material, which the authorities often exploit to prosecute politically incorrect speech.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This is blasphemy law by the back door.” – Stephen Gray

Image by James Mitchell.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A British retiree has been fined for joking about the Islamic prophet's marriage to a child on social media, spotlighting the United Kingdom's censorious laws against "grossly offensive" communications.

show more

New Ukrainian Defense Chief Installed as Predecessor Calls for Wartime Elections.

Volodymyr Zelensky’s leadership in Ukraine is facing fresh challenges, as the former Minister of Defense and Acting Head of the Security Service calls for fresh elections.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Ukraine’s parliament appointed former special forces operative Yevhenii Khmara as Minister of Defense, equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of War, on Wednesday, hours after his predecessor, Mykhailo Fedorov, called for wartime elections, over two years after President Volodymyr Zelensky‘s current term was supposed to end. Khmara takes over as Ukraine faces continued Russian missile attacks and battlefield pressure, while Zelensky confronts growing criticism over recent government shake-ups.
📺 DETAIL: The removal last month of Fedorov, who was also Acting Head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), sparked rare wartime protests against Zelensky, with thousands taking to the streets to demand his reinstatement. Fedorov now argues that Ukraine must find a legal and secure way to restore its democratic process despite the prolonged conflict, although analysts say organizing elections would be extremely difficult with millions of Ukrainians displaced and hundreds of thousands serving in the military. Khmara was reportedly not Zelensky’s first choice for the defense post, and he has faced criticism from some lawmakers who view him as too closely aligned with the President. His appointment comes amid further political turmoil after anti-corruption authorities announced an investigation into an alleged $3 million money-laundering scheme involving a deputy head of Zelensky’s office
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We must find a legal, safe, and realistic mechanism that will allow Ukraine to renew its full democratic process even in the conditions of a long war.” – Mykhailo Fedorov
🎯 IMPACT: The instability created by Fedorov’s replacement and public call for fresh elections could complicate Kiev’s efforts to maintain public confidence and political unity.
📺 FLASHBACK: Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies have been under pressure to address high-profile graft cases, including a $100 million kickback scheme involving the state atomic energy agency last year, which led to public outrage and the dismissal of key officials.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Volodymyr Zelensky's leadership in Ukraine is facing fresh challenges, as the former Minister of Defense and Acting Head of the Security Service calls for fresh elections.

show more

DATA: Most California Dems Favor Democratic Socialist Candidates.

A new poll has revealed a growing generational split among California Democrats, with younger Democrats favoring democratic socialists and older Democrats favoring more mainstream candidates, with substantial support for far-left candidates overall.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Most California Democrats support democratic socialist candidates, according to a new poll.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, and co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times, 58 percent of registered Democrats in California favored democratic socialist candidates. The poll also revealed that 60 percent of Democrats in the state support progressives, while only 48 percent favor more mainstream Democrats. Notably, support for democratic socialist candidates varies by age cohort. Democrats under 40 show more support for democratic socialists, while Democrats over 65 overwhelmingly back mainstream Democrats. Specifically, 69 percent of California Democrats aged between 18 and 29 expressed support for democratic socialists, compared to 45 percent of those over 65. In contrast, only 32 percent of Democrats in the state between 18 and 29 were more inclined to support a mainstream Democrat, compared to 67 percent of those over 65. The survey also revealed that 40 percent of all Californian voters support progressives, slightly ahead of democratic socialists, specifically, on 38 percent.
💬 KEY QUOTE:There’s particular frustration among the younger voting population… Their views of mainstream Democrats are not that positive, and that’s a long-term problem, I think, for the Democratic Party.” – Mark DiCamillo, Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) poll director
🎯 IMPACT: The results highlight the internal divisions within the Democratic Party. This underscores the leftward shift of the Democrats over the course of the 2026 election cycle. This reflects similar reports from earlier this year. Back in July, a poll revealed that one-third of Democrats describe themselves as democratic socialists. That same month, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who is backed by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the far-left political organization currently taking over the Democrats from within, topped a poll in New Hampshire.

Image by Famartin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed a growing generational split among California Democrats, with younger Democrats favoring democratic socialists and older Democrats favoring more mainstream candidates, with substantial support for far-left candidates overall.

show more

Sheriff Bans ICE From Firing Ranges and Training Facilities.

San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced restrictions on ICE’s use of county facilities while maintaining access for CBP to safeguard border operations and the regional economy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced Tuesday that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will no longer be permitted to use sheriff facilities for firearms qualifications and training, alleging it will damage community trust.
📺 DETAIL: The decision comes as the San Diego County Board of Supervisors moves to terminate facility agreements with both ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), though Martinez distinguished between the two agencies when issuing her ban, saying she will continue to allow CBP to use the county’s Otay Range. More than 225,000 people cross through San Diego’s ports of entry each day, including tens of thousands of vehicles, pedestrians, and commercial trucks, according to the sheriff’s office. Martinez said CBP relies on the Otay Range for required classroom and firearms training and has limited alternatives nearby, potentially forcing officers to travel farther from inspection facilities. Martinez conceded that eliminating CBP’s access would cause broader harm to residents and businesses.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Our authority to enforce the law depends on the trust and confidence of the communities we serve, and I always balance my decisions based on community trust and public safety,” said Sheriff Kelly Martinez, appearing to suggest that illegal aliens subject to deportation are one of the communities she serves.
🎯 IMPACT: The decision will strain relations and cooperation between local authorities and federal immigration agencies, raising concerns about the operational impact of restricting access to training facilities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced restrictions on ICE's use of county facilities while maintaining access for CBP to safeguard border operations and the regional economy.

show more

Farage’s Reform Party Tops Another Poll as Labour and ‘Conservatives’ Slip.

Another poll has put Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party ahead of new Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s Labour Party, suggesting that the so-called “Burnham Bounce” has waned.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has topped another poll, while support for the establishment Labour and Conservative (Tory) parties has declined.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new poll conducted by YouGov, the largest polling firm in Britain, Reform is the most popular party with British voters, on 24 percent support. The poll put the governing Labour Party in second on 22 percent and Kemi Badenoch’s nominally center-right Conservative Party in third on 19 percent. Zack Polanski’s far-left Green Party secured 13 percent, and the Liberal Democrats, who want to re-join the European Union (EU), secured 12 percent. Restore Britain, a splinter party from Reform led by the Conservative-allied Rupert Lowe, secured just four percent of the vote. The findings were published on Wednesday. Reform UK experienced an increase of two percent while both Labour and the Conservatives experienced a drop of two percent. The Green Party and the Liberal Democrats both received an increase of one percent, while Restore Britain saw no change in support.
💬 KEY QUOTE: Reform up 2 and BACK in the lead with YouGov. Labour and the Tories DOWN 2. The Burnham and Kemi bounces going well I see!” – Zia Yusuf, Reform’s Shadow Home Secretary, on X (formerly Twitter)
🎯 IMPACT: This poll reflects similar findings published over the course of August. At the start of the month, YouGov put support for Reform on 23 percent, one percent ahead of Labour. Last week, according to a poll by Survation, another British polling firm, Reform secured 26 percent with Labour trailing on 25 percent, an increase of two percent and a drop of one percent, respectively. This suggests that the so-called “Burnham Bounce,” an uptick in support for the governing Labour Party following Andy Burnham’s election as Labour leader and subsequent appointment as Prime Minister, has waned. The findings also suggest that the so-called “Kemi Bounce,” a similar alleged uptick in support for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, has also waned. This shows the British electorate’s enduring frustration with the two establishment parties, which have exchanged the governance of Britain for a century.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Another poll has put Nigel Farage's Reform UK party ahead of new Prime Minister Andy Burnham's Labour Party, suggesting that the so-called "Burnham Bounce" has waned.

show more

Trump Temporarily Pauses 50% Tariffs on Canada.

President Trump has temporarily halted new tariffs on Canadian imports as trade talks advance, potentially impacting key industries and reviving discussions on the Keystone XL pipeline.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has delayed a planned 50 percent tariff on nearly $20 billion of Canadian imports for three days, saying the pause reflects progress toward a new trade agreement with Canada. Trump said the two countries had reached a deal subject to finalizing the documents, while Prime Minister Mark Carney acknowledged “substantial progress” but said negotiations were not yet complete.
📺 DETAIL: The discussions have focused on U.S. tariffs on Canadian autos and other products, as well as Canadian restrictions on American liquor and dairy. U.S. negotiators were reportedly considering reducing auto tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent, although disagreements remain over which vehicles would qualify. Trump also suggested that a new agreement could pave the way for the revival of the Keystone XL pipeline, a project capable of carrying roughly 830,000 barrels of Alberta oil to the United States. Canadian provincial leaders, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, would need to support any rollback of liquor restrictions, because alcohol sales fall under provincial jurisdiction.
🎯 IMPACT: The three-day tariff delay provides temporary relief for businesses and consumers on both sides of the border while giving U.S. and Canadian negotiators additional time to finalize a broader trade agreement. A deal could ease tensions between the two trading partners and reduce the risk of higher prices and supply chain disruptions.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has temporarily halted new tariffs on Canadian imports as trade talks advance, potentially impacting key industries and reviving discussions on the Keystone XL pipeline.

show more

Census Bureau Finds Over 24,000 Noncitizens Voted in 2020 Election.

A U.S. Census Bureau analysis has identified tens of thousands of noncitizens voting in the 2020 election, raising concerns about election integrity.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. Census Bureau report has revealed that more than 24,000 noncitizens cast ballots in the 2020 general election, with more potentially still to be identified.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The data pertains to the 2020 general election, with California found to have by far the most noncitizen voters, at 4,300, followed by Texas at 2,500.
📺 DETAIL: The report found that of the 24,000 noncitizen voters identified, 3,800 were from Mexico, the most common country of origin. However, nearly 7,000 have no identified country of origin, so the nationality data is far from complete. The Census Bureau analyzed a total of 160 million votes, with “high confidence” that 128 million were cast by citizens, leaving 32 million records still to be reviewed.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Census Bureau’s beginning analysis readily determined with high confidence that over 128 million of these voter records represented citizens, and that over 24,000 of these voter records represented noncitizens at the time of the election. Over 32 million voter records remain to be analyzed… Of the voters who can be readily analyzed by the Census Bureau, over 24,000 are linked to administrative records that indicate with high confidence noncitizen status.” – U.S. Census Bureau, Noncitizen Voting in the 2020 Election, A Beginning Analysis
🎯 IMPACT: The findings raise questions about election security and voter verification processes, particularly in states with higher rates of noncitizen voting. President Donald J. Trump and his administration have been pushing hard for new legislation mandating voter ID and other election integrity measures, but congressional Democrats—who benefit disproportionately from illegal noncitizen voting—are strongly resisting. This is despite the fact that large majorities of Republican, Democrat, and Independent voters all support voter ID.

Image by Joe Mabel.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A U.S. Census Bureau analysis has identified tens of thousands of noncitizens voting in the 2020 election, raising concerns about election integrity.

show more