❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump issued pardons for members of his 2020 campaign legal team, including Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell, among others.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, Mark Meadows, and others.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made late Sunday evening, at 10:54 PM local time, via Twitter by Ed Martin, Trump’s “clemency czar.”
💬KEY QUOTE: “No MAGA left behind.” – Ed Martin
🎯IMPACT: The pardons reignite discussions over the 2020 election challenges and the legal fallout for those involved, including Giuliani, who faced professional disgrace and disbarment.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump granted pardons to key figures from his 2020 campaign’s legal squad, such as Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sidney Powell, and Kenneth Chesebro. The news was announced through an X (formerly Twitter) post from Ed Martin, Trump’s designated “clemency czar,” listing 77 individuals tied to various aspects of the 2020 election dispute. Martin’s post was an update to a previous post in May, in which he pledged, “No MAGA left behind.”
These acts of clemency cover those implicated in the so-called “fake elector” plot, an effort to send alternative electors in states that Joe Biden had supposedly carried. Notably, the list excludes Trump himself, with the America First leader declining to issue a self-pardon.
Beyond the so-called “fake elector” maneuver, the team under Trump filed court challenges alleging fraud in the 2020 vote. Rudy Giuliani, long hailed as “America’s Mayor” for steering New York City through 9/11, saw his reputation come under sustained assault over his part in the election pushback. He lost his law license in both Washington, D.C., and New York.
John Eastman, who advised that disgraced former Vice President Mike Pence could send disputed results back to the states for examination, suffered similar persecution, and was even debanked.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has sent a legal letter to the BBC over Panorama‘s selective editing of his 2021 Capitol riot speech, broadcast shortly before the 2024 presidential election, which spliced different sections together to make it appear as though he was calling for violence.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, BBC Chairman Samir Shah, former Director-General Tim Davie, former CEO of News Deborah Turness, and Reform Party leader Nigel Farage.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The controversy arose following a BBC Panorama broadcast in 2024, which contained a highly misleading edit of the President. A whistleblower exposed the scandal in November 2025, leading to resignations.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The TOP people in the BBC, including TIM DAVIE, the BOSS, are all quitting/FIRED, because they were caught ‘doctoring’ my very good (PERFECT!) speech of January 6th.” – Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: The BBC faces allegations of institutional bias, with resignations and calls for reform from political leaders and commentators following the Trump speech scandal.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has threatened legal action against the BBC after it was revealed that the broadcaster’s Panorama program doctored his speech on January 6, 2021. The edits spliced together two different sections of the America First leader’s speech to make it look as though he was calling for violence, and removed a portion where he urged his supporters to demonstrate peacefully.
The scandal, exposed by a whistleblower, has led to the resignations of BBC Director-General Tim Davie and the CEO of News, Deborah Turness. Turness conceded that the matter had escalated to a point of harming the BBC’s reputation.
India-born BBC Chairman Samir Shah came to the organization’s defense in a letter to the British Parliament’s Culture, Media, and Sport Committee, admitting that there have been “occasions when the BBC gets things wrong” but insisting that its issues are being tackled. Of President Trump’s legal letter to the BBC, he said the broadcaster was “now considering how to reply to him,” while offering no apology.
Notably, the Panorama programme spliced together different sections of Trump’s January 6 speech together and presented him as saying, “We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you and we fight. We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore.” In fact, the America First leader said, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women,” with the “fight like hell” comments coming almost an hour later.
Reform Party leader and longtime Trump ally Nigel Farage said he has spoken to the President, and he is “absolutely enraged” by the BBC’s behavior. Farage himself accused the broadcaster of “election interference,” with the Panorama edit having been broadcast shortly before the 2025 presidential election.
Because the BBC is funded by a compulsory television license fee, which must be paid on pain of fines backed by the threat of imprisonment, it is required by its charter to be balanced and impartial. However, it is widely regarded as having an institutional left-wing bias, including by its own veteran broadcasters.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Senate broke its weeks-long standoff, advancing a deal to end the historic government shutdown.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), Senate Democrats, Senate Republicans, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
📍WHEN & WHERE: The Senate vote occurred late Sunday night, with the House expected to return early this week.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s a great development. It’s long overdue. It vindicates our position in this all along.” – Speaker Mike Johnson
🎯IMPACT: The deal ends the longest government shutdown in U.S. history and provides temporary funding through January 30.
IN FULL
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is taking a victory lap after a new House-proposed bill which will temporarily fund the government through January 30 was adopted by the Senate late Sunday. The bill, still needing final approval from the House, saw eight Senate Democrats break ranks and join Republicans in ending the government shutdown.
According to Johnson, the lower chamber will return to Washington, D.C. for session “immediately,” with the Speaker stating: “It’s a great development. It’s long overdue. It vindicates our position in this all along.” Notably, the House left Washington on September 19 and has not returned to session after passing a clean continuing resolution (CR) to fund the government. The Senate Democrats’ rejection of the clean CR is what kicked off the shutdown—which became the longest in U.S. history.
On Sunday evening, eight Senate Democrats joined nearly all Senate Republicans to break a filibuster and advance a new funding deal. The agreement, reached on the 40th day of the shutdown, includes temporary federal funding through January 30, 2026, and provisions for specific appropriations bills covering the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction, and the legislative branch.
The deal also includes measures reversing federal layoffs implemented during the Trump administration and guarantees Senate Democrats a vote on extending enhanced Obamacare subsidies. However, no such guarantee was made in the House, leading to frustration among progressive lawmakers. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) called the vote “a very, very bad vote.” At the same time, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) criticized the lack of movement on extending Obamacare tax credits.
Several Republicans highlighted that the final deal closely resembled what Senate GOP leaders had proposed weeks earlier, underscoring the prolonged nature of the standoff and Democratic obstruction.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: BBC Director General Tim Davie and the CEO of News, Deborah Turness, resigned over a misleading edit of a speech by President Donald J. Trump on January 6, 2021.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tim Davie, Deborah Turness, Donald Trump, and whistleblowers.
📍WHEN & WHERE: London, England, Sunday, October 2023.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Overall the BBC is delivering well, but there have been some mistakes made and as Director-General I have to take ultimate responsibility.” – Tim Davie
🎯IMPACT: The resignations have fueled criticism of the BBC’s impartiality and raised questions about its taxpayer-funded operations.
IN FULL
On Sunday, BBC Director General Tim Davie and News CEO Deborah Turness stepped down amid growing backlash over the de facto state broadcaster’s bias, exemplified by a grossly misleading edit of a speech by President Donald J. Trump on January 6, 2021.
In an internal memo to staff that afternoon, Davie confirmed his resignation was “entirely my decision,” while noting, “Overall the BBC is delivering well, but there have been some mistakes made and as Director-General I have to take ultimate responsibility.” He added that he would collaborate with the BBC board for a seamless handover to his replacement.
Turness, who resigned at the same time, said that “mistakes have been made.” The moves came after a whistleblower revealed the BBC aired a “doctored” clip of Trump’s speech, which falsely suggested he urged on the Capitol rioters through the manipulated splicing of two statements made almost an hour apart.
The BBC Panorama programme showed a clip of Trump saying, “We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you and we fight. We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore.” In truth, Trump said, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.” The whistleblower’s disclosures ignited fury, including from Donald Trump Jr. “The FAKE NEWS ‘reporters’ in the UK are just as dishonest and full of s**t as the ones here in America!!!!” he wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter).
Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, branded the BBC “100 percent fake news” and a “propaganda machine,” lamenting that British taxpayers are “forced to foot the bill for a leftist propaganda machine.” Notably, anyone in Britain who watches live programming is required to fund the BBC via a television license, even if none of the programming they watch is BBC content. Non-payment is punished by criminal fines, backed by the threat of imprisonment.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The capital city of Spain has launched a financial incentive program to encourage higher birth rates, offering payments to parents for having children.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Madrid Mayor José Luis Martínez-Almeida and the city government.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The program, announced in October 2022, officially began on Tuesday and applies to children born or adopted after June 1, 2025, in Madrid, Spain.
💬KEY QUOTE: “There are people who want to start a family, but they don’t have the right conditions to do so.” – José Luis Martínez-Almeida
🎯IMPACT: The initiative aims to address Spain’s declining birth rate and aging population by providing financial support to families.
IN FULL
A new program in Spain‘s capital, Madrid, is offering families a small financial incentive to have more children as the European Union (EU) country seeks to improve its birth rate. Parents in the city can apply for a subsidy equivalent to $578 (€500) for their initial child, $868 (€750) for a second child, and $1,157 (€1,000) for each additional child thereafter.
The Spanish fertility rate currently sits at a meager 1.4 live births per woman, far below the 2.1 replacement rate considered necessary to maintain population levels. Madrid Mayor José Luis Martínez-Almeida implemented the natality program with the aim of reversing the city and country’s declining birth rate and assisting families with the economic challenges of having children.
Notably, most European countries are contending with an aging population and live births that are well below the replacement level, despite mass migration from the Third World.
The subsidy applies to children born or adopted after June 1, 2025, and parents must apply within two months of the birth or adoption. Applications can be submitted online or at municipal offices. The city government has allocated over $20 million (€17.3 million) to the program’s initial phase, with plans to increase the budget if demand exceeds expectations.
Spain’s national government also offers tax deductions ranging upwards of $1,390 (€1,200) per year for children under age three. Meanwhile, regional governments in Andalucia and Valencia also provide subsidies. Mayor Martínez-Almeida stated during the program’s announcement: “There are people who want to start a family, but they don’t have the right conditions to do so.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Britain’s National Crime Agency (NCA) has announced a review of over 1,000 grooming gang cases that were mishandled by police or prosecutors due to “human error.”
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The NCA, local police forces, prosecutors, and victims of grooming gangs, with a focus on cases involving predominantly Pakistani Muslim predators and white working-class victims.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Cases span from 2010 to March 31, 2025, across England and Wales.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Our initial reviews have identified that in some cases where there has been a decision to take no further action [NFA] there were available lines of inquiry that could have been pursued.” – Nigel Leary, NCA Deputy Director
🎯IMPACT: The review, along with a national inquiry, could expose further systemic failures, embarrass political and law enforcement leaders, and reveal the role of political correctness in the mishandling of grooming gang cases.
IN FULL
Britain’s National Crime Agency (NCA)—somewhat comparable to the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)—has announced a sweeping review of more than a thousand grooming gang cases that may have been wrongly abandoned due to “human error” by police or prosecutors. The operation, codenamed Operation Beaconport, will re-examine cases of potential group-based child sexual exploitation across England and Wales that were “incorrectly closed with no further action taken.”
The agency said it had identified 1,273 potential cases, including 236 involving rape allegations, that were dropped between 2010 and March 2025. Most of these investigations took place during a period when the existence of grooming gangs was widely known to the public. NCA Deputy Director Nigel Leary said: “Our initial reviews have identified that in some cases where there has been a decision to take no further action [NFA] there were available lines of inquiry that could have been pursued. We’ve seen in those cases what appears to be potentially human error and … in some cases that those investigations haven’t followed what we would characterise as proper investigative practice, and that will have contributed to the NFA decision.”
For years, victims of predominantly Pakistani-heritage Muslim grooming gangs, usually white working-class girls, reported being dismissed by police and social workers as “prostitutes,” even though they were children incapable of giving consent. Many perpetrators were reportedly overlooked by authorities wary of being accused of racism or of inflaming so-called community relations, and turned a blind eye to the abuse.
The NCA said Beaconport will record the ethnicities of both alleged offenders and victims, which police forces have often actively avoided, presumably to keep the public in the dark. The decision follows a report by Baroness Louise Casey, who found an “appalling lack of data on ethnicity” and said the issue had been “dodged for years.” Casey revealed one case file where someone had used white-out to obscure the word “Pakistani.”
“Child sexual exploitation is horrendous, whoever commits it, but there have been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from [South] Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination,” she wrote.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government, under pressure from figures including Reform Party leader Nigel Farage and X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk, has announced a national inquiry into grooming gang abuse and the failures of local authorities and law enforcement to protect children. Starmer had initially resisted mounting an investigation, accusing campaigners of “jumping on the bandwagon of the far-right.”
The new review could prove politically uncomfortable for Labour, which oversaw many of the council (municipal government) areas where grooming gangs operate, and for Starmer personally, since some cases were closed while he headed the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
Recent revelations have intensified scrutiny of official failings. The police watchdog admitted that senior officers in South Yorkshire neglected victims in what it called a “systemic organisational failure.” Several survivors have also resigned from a government victims’ panel, accusing ministers of trying to silence them. In an open letter, they said: “Being publicly contradicted and dismissed by a government minister when you are a survivor telling the truth takes you right back to that feeling of not being believed all over again.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Yemeni migrant is suing the Netherlands over the refusal to allow his children from two additional wives to join him, raising the issue of polygamy before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Khaled Al-Anesi, a Yemeni asylum seeker, Dutch authorities, and the European Court of Human Rights.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The case stems from Al-Anesi being granted asylum in the Netherlands in 2011; his case is before the ECtHR right now.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Europe doesn’t have to commit this cultural suicide. It’s time to leave the [European Convention on Human Rights].” – Former British Home Secretary Suella Braverman
🎯IMPACT: The case could set a precedent for effectively legalising polygamy in Europe, sparking concerns about the erosion of traditional cultural values.
IN FULL
Europe may soon face a historic legal shift as the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) prepares to rule on whether polygamous families should be recognized under European law. The case involves Khaled Al-Anesi, a Yemeni asylum seeker who was granted refuge in the Netherlands in 2011. Al-Anesi successfully brought his first wife and their eight children to the country under family-reunification rules, but now seeks to bring his two other wives and five additional children, who remain in Turkey.
Dutch authorities rejected his request, citing the nation’s prohibition of polygamy and the fact that the children are already living with their mothers in stable conditions. Officials reportedly suggested that he divorce his other wives to facilitate family reunification, but he refused. Al-Anesi has since sued the Dutch government, claiming it violated his right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which is enforced by the supranational European Court of Human Rights, which is technically separate from the European Union (EU) and still has jursidiction over the United Kingdom.
Notably, the case marks the first time the Court has agreed to examine polygamy within Europe, and its ruling could set a far-reaching precedent for all member states. Former British Home Secretary Suella Braverman condemned the potential implications of the case, warning, “Europe doesn’t have to commit this cultural suicide. It’s time to leave the ECHR.”
The debate comes amid growing concern about the Islamization of Europe. Reports indicate that the United Kingdom, for instance, now hosts around 85 sharia courts and more than 100,000 Islamic marriages not formally registered with the state. Critics argue that such developments erode Western legal norms and could pave the way for a de facto parallel legal system.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump said he is considering granting Hungary an exemption from U.S. sanctions on Russian energy during a meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, and Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The discussions took place on November 7 at the White House.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I am simply asking for the realization that the sanctions recently imposed on Russian energy puts certain countries like Hungary, which do not have access to the sea, in an impossible situation.” – Viktor Orban.
🎯IMPACT: The potential exemption could alleviate Hungary’s energy problems, while a newly announced nuclear energy agreement aims to increase Hungary’s use of U.S. technology and fuel over the longer term.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump said Friday that he is considering granting Hungary an exemption from U.S. sanctions on Russian energy. The announcement was made during a White House meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who described the matter as “vital” for his country and warned of serious consequences if the restrictions were implemented.
“We’re looking at it because it’s very difficult for him to get the oil and gas from other areas,” President Trump said, adding: “It’s a big country, but they don’t have sea, they don’t have the ports. And so they have a difficult problem.”
Trump also praisedOrbán for his strong border and immigration policies, in contrast with the wider European Union’s permissive attitude towards mass migration, while Orbán praised the President’s foreign policy achievements.
“I’m not asking for some kind of gift from the Americans or some kind of unusual thing,” Orbán, a longtime ally and supporter of the America First leader, explained on Hungarian radio previously. “I am simply asking for the realization that the sanctions recently imposed on Russian energy puts certain countries like Hungary, which do not have access to the sea, in an impossible situation,” adding that he was “going to ask the President to acknowledge that.”
Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó announced during the U.S. trip that Hungary will sign a bilateral nuclear energy cooperation agreement with the United States. The deal, negotiated with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, will see Hungary purchase American nuclear fuel for the first time, adopt U.S. technology for spent-fuel storage at its Paks nuclear power plant, and collaborate on the development of small modular reactors.
Hungary imports more than 80 percent of its natural gas and a majority of its oil from Russia. Despite EU efforts to phase out Russian fossil fuels, Budapest has repeatedly fought exemptions, arguing that its landlocked geography on the border of Ukraine leaves it few alternatives.
Notably, relations between Hungary and Ukraine are tense following Kiev’s claim earlier this year that it uncovered a Hungarian spy network operating in western Ukraine, an accusation Hungary denies. Ukraine hosts a large Hungarian ethnic minority in its Transcarpathia border region, with Budapest often complaining that Kiev mistreats them.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against Planned Parenthood, alleging false claims about the safety of the abortion-inducing drug mifepristone and citing anti-mafia statutes.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, Planned Parenthood, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was announced on Friday, with claims targeting Planned Parenthood’s activities in Florida.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Planned Parenthood sells profitable abortions to vulnerable women by lying to them about abortion pills being safer than Tylenol,” wrote Uthmeier in the filing.
🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks $350 million in damages and accuses Planned Parenthood of misleading women and violating RICO statutes.
IN FULL
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a major lawsuit against Planned Parenthood, accusing the organization of misleading women about the safety of the abortion-inducing drug mifepristone. The complaint, filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, alleges that Planned Parenthood falsely advertises mifepristone as being “safer than Tylenol,” a claim Uthmeier describes as “manifestly false.”
Mifepristone, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, is typically taken with misoprostol to induce a “chemical abortion.” According to the lawsuit, the drug carries significant risks, with roughly 10 percent of users experiencing serious complications within 45 days. Uthmeier’s filing also cites research indicating that, on average, more than one death per year has been linked to mifepristone since its approval. “Planned Parenthood sells profitable abortions to vulnerable women by lying to them about abortion pills being safer than Tylenol,” Uthmeier wrote in his court submission.
The state is seeking $350 million in damages, based on a calculation of $10,000 per affected individual in Florida, and argues that Planned Parenthood promotes chemical abortions over surgical ones because they are more profitable. The lawsuit claims the organization engaged in a “pattern of racketeering activity” through misleading advertising and marketing materials.
Planned Parenthood representatives have forcefully denied the allegations, with Susan Baker Manning, a national spokeswoman, responding bluntly: “See you in court.”
The legal battle comes amid broader political and legal fights surrounding Planned Parenthood. The organization, which operates more than 600 health centers nationwide, has faced scrutiny over its political involvement and funding. Earlier this year, a Florida chapter was accused in an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) complaint of offering resources to former Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign, a move critics say may violate nonprofit rules.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Army announced plans to purchase at least one million drones within the next two to three years, with an emphasis on increasing domestic production capabilities.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, Major General John Reim, and other military officials, alongside drone manufacturers and lawmakers.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made during a visit to Picatinny Arsenal, with plans to implement over the next two to three years.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We expect to purchase at least a million drones within the next two to three years.” – Daniel Driscoll
🎯IMPACT: The initiative aims to strengthen U.S. military readiness, reduce reliance on foreign manufacturers, and modernize the Army’s approach to drone warfare.
IN FULL
The U.S. Army has announced an ambitious plan to purchase at least one million drones within the next two to three years, marking a dramatic expansion of its unmanned systems program. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll confirmed the initiative during a visit to Picatinny Arsenal, highlighting the service’s efforts to modernize drone warfare and strengthen domestic production. “We expect to purchase at least a million drones within the next two to three years,” Driscoll said.
He emphasized that the Army aims to reduce its dependence on foreign manufacturers, particularly China, which currently dominates the global drone market. Driscoll said the military must view drones not as expensive assets but as expendable tools comparable to ammunition—cheap, replaceable, and used in large quantities.
The plan follows the Pentagon’s broader push to increase its drone capabilities. In 2023, the Department of Defense, now the Department of War, launched the Replicator initiative, designed to deploy thousands of autonomous drones by 2025. Although updates on that effort have been limited, U.S. lawmakers have since proposed building a massive drone production facility in Texas that could produce up to one million units annually.
Rather than rely solely on majordefense contractors, Driscoll said the Army will prioritize partnerships with smaller, commercially oriented drone makers. “We want to partner with other drone manufacturers who are using them for Amazon deliveries and all the different use cases,” he explained. The approach is intended to expand innovation while diversifying the industrial base for military drone production.
The move also reflects lessons learned from recent conflicts. Drones have proven decisive in the Russia-Ukraine war, where both sides now produce millions of low-cost systems each year. Notably, Ukraine previously turned to purchasing Chinese-made drones after struggling with reliability issues in American models.
Meanwhile, Poland recently shot down a large number of alleged Russian drones that violated its airspace, demonstrating how cheap unmanned aircraft are reshaping modern warfare.
Drone proliferation has also become a concern at home. Reports indicate that Mexican cartels are operating thousands of drones along the U.S. southern border for smuggling and surveillance, highlighting the growing domestic security implications of low-cost aerial technology.
Driscoll said the Army’s push is designed to ensure the United States can compete with adversaries already producing drones on a massive scale. “Drones are the future of warfare, and we’ve got to invest in both the offensive and defense capabilities against them,” he said.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
