The Trump administration is seeking swift Supreme Court intervention to implement new mail-in voting restrictions ahead of the November midterms.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration on Wednesday again asked the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly intervene to allow the U.S. Postal Service to implement nationwide restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the November midterm elections. Solicitor General D. John Sauer urged the justices to overturn two rulings by Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani that have blocked the Trump administration’s plans, warning that further delays could prevent the changes from taking effect before the elections. 📺 DETAIL: Talwani ruled Tuesday in a separate case brought by the League of Women Voters and other so-called voting rights groups that the Postal Service should not alter its procedures less than 90 days before the November 3 election. Her ruling followed an earlier decision blocking the changes in California and 22 other states, which was upheld by an appeals court. The Trump administration’s plan stems from an executive order Trump issued in March directing federal agencies to verify voter eligibility and restrict mail-in ballots to individuals included on state-specific voter lists. Sauer contends that the legal challenges are premature because the Postal Service has not yet taken concrete actions that would harm the plaintiffs, and asked the Supreme Court to clarify that both lower court rulings should be halted. 🎯 IMPACT: If the Supreme Court sides with the Trump administration, the Postal Service could implement measures to limit mail-in voting. Officials argue the move will increase election security and reduce the risk of mail-in voter fraud. 📺 FLASHBACK: This legal challenge follows a March executive order by President Donald J. Trump, which sought to enhance election integrity by requiring state-by-state citizenship verification for mail voting. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less