Monday, February 23, 2026

Man Charged Over Alleged Assassination Plot Against Trump’s OMB Director Russ Vought.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Maryland man has been arrested and charged with attempted murder in connection with an alleged plot targeting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Colin Demarco, a 26-year-old Maryland resident, and Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred in August 2025 at Vought’s residence in Northern Virginia. Demarco was arrested last month and is being held in Arlington County.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: Demarco admitted he wanted to confront Vought about Project 2025, expressing fears of a “fascist takeover,” and stating that President Donald J. Trump’s 2024 election victory was the “lowest point in his life.”

🎯IMPACT: The arrest and subsequent charges are the latest notable instance of political violence tied to Democrat claims that President Trump and Republicans are “fascists.”

IN FULL

A Maryland man was formally charged on Thursday with attempted murder for allegedly plotting to assassinate Russell Vought, the director of the Trump administration’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Project 2025 architect. “Colin Demarco, 26, of Rockville, MD is charged with Attempted Murder, Criminal Solicitation to Commit Murder, Carrying a Concealed Weapon and Wearing a Mask in Public to Conceal Identity,” the Arlington County Police Department (ACPD) announced, adding, “He was taken into custody at his residence on January 16 and later extradited to the Commonwealth of Virginia.”

In August last year, Demarco allegedly appeared outside Vought’s Northern Virginia home and was observed by a neighbor exhibiting suspicious behavior. According to the ACPD, “A witness reported observing a male suspect, who was wearing a surgical mask and rubber gloves, carrying a backpack and appeared to be concealing a firearm under his shirt, on the victim’s porch. The suspect subsequently approached the witness and inquired about the victim before leaving the scene.”

The ACPD states that officers were dispatched to the residence, but a canvass of the area did not turn up a suspect. However, a home surveillance camera captured an image of Demarco, leading to his eventual identification by law enforcement. Consequently, police executed search warrants for digital records associated with the suspect, including “digital evidence that the suspect had obtained directions to the victim’s residence, had information detailing locations of firearms possessed by a relative, and had a guide detailing tips to prevent criminal detection.”

Notably, court documents state that in the days prior to Demarco traveling to Vought’s home, the 26-year-old made numerous posts online attempting to solicit others to carry out the murder of the OMB director. Demacro eventually decided to carry out the assassination himself, the charging documents allege.

After his arrest, Demarco admitted to being in Arlington last August, but claimed he was job hunting and denied carrying a weapon or intending to harm Vought. He did, however, admit he wanted to confront Vought about Project 2025, expressing fears of a “fascist takeover,” and stating that President Donald J. Trump’s 2024 election victory was the “lowest point in his life.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kamala Campaign Demanded to Know If Josh Shapiro Was an Israeli Agent.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Kamala Harris’s team reportedly asked Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro (D) if he was an Israeli double agent during the 2024 vice presidential selection process, as detailed in Shapiro’s new memoir.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former Vice President Kamala Harris, Governor Shapiro, Dana Remus (former White House counsel), and Harris’s vetting team.

📍WHEN & WHERE: During the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign, as Harris considered her vice presidential running mate options.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Had I been a double agent for Israel?” Shapiro wrote, expressing his surprise at the question from Harris’s team.

🎯IMPACT: The revelations in Shapiro’s book highlight tensions during Harris’s campaign, and likely mark the beginning of jockeying by potential 2028 Democrat presidential primary candidates.

IN FULL

In his new memoir, Where We Keep the Light, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro (D) revealed that Kamala Harris’s team asked if he was an Israeli double agent during the 2024 vice presidential selection process. The question, posed by Dana Remus, a former White House counsel, left Shapiro, who served as an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) volunteer in his twenties, stunned. “Had I been a double agent for Israel?” he wrote, describing his reaction to the inquiry.

Shapiro stated that the vetting team justified the question by saying, “Well, we have to ask.” He also alleged that Harris’s team wanted to know if he had communicated with undercover Israeli agents. Shapiro responded, “If they were undercover, I responded, how the hell would I know?” He later reflected that the question “said a lot about some of the people around the VP.”

Harris ultimately chose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) as her running mate, a decision criticized by some at the time, given Shapiro’s status as governor of Pennsylvania, a critical swing state. Shapiro’s memoir also recounts his frustration with other questions from Harris’s team, including whether he would soften his criticisms of student protests against Israeli actions in Gaza. Shapiro maintained his position, stating, “It nagged at me that their questions weren’t really about substance. Rather, they were questioning my ideology, my approach, my worldview.”

Shapiro also suggested that Harris disliked her own role as vice president, citing her complaints about the lack of authority and amenities associated with the position. “I was surprised by how much she seemed to dislike the role,” he wrote. Harris, in her own memoir 107 Days, offered a different perspective, accusing Shapiro of having an ambition for power that exceeded the typical responsibilities of a vice president and expressing concerns about his “lack of discretion.”

The vetting meetings appear to have left the Pennsylvania governor notably disinclined to serve as Harris’s running mate, to the point that the Harris campaign and Remus took a few parting shots in a follow-up conversation. In their final conversation, Remus is alleged to have emphasized the financial burden of the vice presidency and noted Shapiro’s lack of personal wealth. Harris’s team also insisted that Shapiro’s wife, Lori, would need to purchase an entirely new wardrobe, and that the couple would have to pay for “Second Lady-level hair and makeup,” as well as food and entertainment at the Naval Observatory. “Are you trying to convince me not to do this?” Gov. Shapiro claims to have responded.

Image by Tom Wolf.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Stephen Miller’s Professor Says He Predicted Being #2 in a Trump White House… in 2003!?

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A former Duke University professor claims that, in 2003, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller was a student of his and accurately predicted that he would be the number two staffer in the White House and that the President would be Donald J. Trump in the next 15 years.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Stephen Miller, Professor H. E. (Hein) Goemans, and President Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The interview surfaced on social media on Wednesday, January 14, 2026.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “I asked him in 2003 what he wanted to be when he grew up, and he said, ‘I want to be number two in the White House.’ And I said, ‘Oh, when do you want to achieve that?’ He says, ‘In the next fifteen years.'” — Prof. Goemans

🎯IMPACT: The fact that Miller is the number two White House staffer and that the President is Donald Trump proves incredible prescience.

IN FULL

A former Duke University professor claims that, in 2003, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller was a student of his and accurately predicted that he would be the number two staffer in the White House and that the president would be Donald J. Trump in the next 15 years.

“I asked him in 2003 what he wanted to be when he grew up,” Professor H. E. (Hein) Goemans—who now teaches at the University of Rochester—said in a recent radio interview, continuing, “And he said, ‘I want to be number two in the White House.’ And I said, ‘Oh, when do you want to achieve that?’ He says, ‘In the next fifteen years.'”

“I said, ‘Wow, okay, but who would be the president?’ In 2003. And he said, ‘Donald Trump, maybe,'” Prof. Goemans stated, to the astonishment of the host. The professor added, “The guy is very smart,” while noting the conversation took place “at Duke, in PoliSci 122.”


Shortly after President Trump’s landslide 2024 election victory, Miller was named White House Deputy Chief of Staff, subordinate only to Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. In this role, Miller oversees a significant portion of U.S. public policy—especially the administration’s enforcement of federal immigration laws and certain national security issues.

He also served as U.S. Homeland Security Advisor.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

WATCH: Deranged Kathy Griffin Turns Election Denier, Suggests ‘Professional Nazi’ Elon Musk Rigged Race.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Kathy Griffin is claiming that President Donald J. Trump’s election was not legitimate, suggesting “professional Nazi” Elon Musk somehow rigged the race.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kathy Griffin, President Trump, and Elon Musk.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 2025, ahead of a public protest event.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “I’m going to say something that’s going to get me in trouble: I don’t think he won in a free and fair election. You heard me. I’m coming out and saying it myself, I don’t care if that means I look crazy.” – Kathy Griffin

🎯IMPACT: Griffin’s comments underscore how many liberals are becoming election deniers in the wake of Trump’s landslide victory in 2024.

IN FULL

Leftist comedian Kathy Griffin has outed herself as an election denier, declaring that President Donald J. Trump’s landslide victory over Kamala Harris in 2024 was not legitimate, and implying that tech mogul Elon Musk somehow rigged the race. In a video endorsing a ‘No Kings Day’ protest—so-called “because Trump thinks he’s a f**king king”—Griffin insisted that Trump is “barely a president,” adding: “In fact, guess what? I’m going to say something that’s going to get me in trouble: I don’t think he won in a free and fair election. You heard me.”

“I’m coming out and saying it myself, I don’t care if that means I look crazy,” Griffin continued, rambling: “Because, Elon Musk, who’s this other Nazi guy running around town, who owns X, and a lot of people think he’s a genius, but he’s not, he’s like, a fake genius. Anyway, he’s a, but, he’s a professional Nazi, in my humble opinion, and, um, he’s good friends with Trump, and at one point, I don’t know if you remember, but he was giving out million-dollar checks to people if they would vote for Trump.”

Griffin complained that this fictitious scheme was “unconstitutional and illegal,” adding that “the fact that Trump won all seven swing states, which has never happened in the history of the U.S., makes it all very suspicious to me.” This is also untrue, however, with the seven swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—only being swing states in the modern era. Richard Nixon, for instance, won every state in the Union bar Massachusetts in 1972, and Ronald Reagan won every state bar Minnesota in 1984.

Griffin—still best known for being fired for brandishing a mock-up of Trump’s bloodied, severed head during his first administration—is not the only Democrat to have turned to election denial since Trump’s reelection. The National Pulse has previously reported on the “Bluelulu” movement—a play on the expression “delulu,” meaning “delusional”—which also tends to feature Musk in its conspiracy theories, many of which center on SpaceX satellites somehow digitally altering election results.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

‘Bluelulu’ Election Deniers Are Insisting Kamala Harris Is President.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Kamala Harris held a book event in Times Square for her new release, 107 Days, which reflects on her failed presidential campaign. Attendees “nearly convinced” The Cut that the 2024 election was stolen from her and she is the real President of the United States.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, her remaining supporters, and The Cut.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday afternoon in Times Square, New York City.

💬KEY QUOTE: “How could it not have been voter fraud?” – Harris supporter Kathleen Sapio

🎯IMPACT: The Harris supporters’ attitude underscores that, as in 2016, many on the left are unable to accept that their fellow Americans prefer Donald J. Trump’s policies to Democrat policies.

IN FULL

Diehard Kamala Harris supporters are insisting that she is the real President of the United States, denying the results of the 2024 election. The views were expressed to The Cut by members of a small group of Harris acolytes gathered outside a theater in New York’s Times Square to hear her talk about her new book, 107 Days, which details her failed presidential campaign.

Kathleen Sapio, who works in distribution at a major broadcaster, outlined a conspiracy theory involving Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite network somehow altering the results of the election, saying, “How could it not have been voter fraud?”

Attendee Jay Grogan proudly described himself as “bluelulu”—a play on “delulu,” meaning “delusional,” which refers to Democrat election deniers. He complained swing states had been called too quickly on election night, insisting there “were too many anomalies” and again referencing the Starlink conspiracy theory.

“Afterward, I was like, ‘Something is off,’ and of course it made me feel delusional. Then I got online and I was like, ‘OK, I’m not alone,'” he told The Cut, essentially confirming that leftist communities online are encouraging delusional beliefs among Democrats.

Teacher Lori Delrosso said flat-out of Harris, “She’s the President. She won.” She also referenced Starlink.

Fellow teacher Laura Mastrangelo expressed shock that Harris “didn’t get more votes from women and minorities,” demanding: “What happened in Pennsylvania?”

A black law professor in her sixties, identified only as “Ann,” told The Cut that she does not think “we’ll ever know” if President Trump stole the election, “But I do think that even if they didn’t steal it, there was so much significant voter suppression going on that it wasn’t a fair election in general.”

Despite conceding that the claims the 2024 election was stolen by Starlink or some other means, The Cut features writer Angelina Chapin said the “bluelulu” advocates “nearly convinced” her.

The event itself ended up being interrupted by demonstrators who stood up to accuse Harris of complicity in genocide in Gaza.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kamala Blames Everyone But Herself for Landslide 2024 Election Loss.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former Vice President Kamala Harris is blaming nearly every top Democrat leader—except herself—for her disastrous 2024 presidential campaign in a new memoir, 107 Days.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, former President Joe Biden, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Pete Buttigieg, and others in the Democratic Party.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The memoir, released Tuesday, September 23, 2025, recounts the 107 days leading up to her landslide electoral defeat at the hands of President Donald J. Trump, along with flashbacks to key moments in her political career.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “They hide you away for four years, give you impossible, s**t jobs… and still they have to ask if we’re loyal?” – Doug Emhoff, Harris’s husband.

🎯IMPACT: The book serves as both a defense of Harris’s campaign and a potential prelude to future political aspirations.

IN FULL

Kamala Harris’s new memoir, 107 Days, released on Tuesday, lays the blame for the former Democratic vice president’s landslide 2024 presidential campaign defeat on nearly every top Democratic Party leader—other than herself. The book, structured around the 107 days between Harris being selected to replace former President Joe Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket to her landslide electoral loss to President Donald J. Trump, acts less as a mea culpa than an attempt at revisionist history, portraying Harris as a victim of circumstance and Democrat infighting.

Harris does not shy away from placing blame on others, including Biden, whom she claims severely hindered her chances. According to Harris, Biden’s late decision not to run and his comments about Trump supporters being “garbage” were detrimental. Her husband, Doug Emhoff, echoed her frustrations, stating, “They hide you away for four years, give you impossible, s**t jobs… never fight back when you’re attacked, never praise your accomplishments… and still they have to ask if we’re loyal?”

Prominent figures like Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA) are not spared Harris’s wrath, either. “I supported Joe because he was the strongest voice for the working class. Please focus on the working class, not just on abortion,” Sanders advised Harris—a point she ignored, insisting “reproductive rights” was a key wedge issue for Democrats. Meanwhile, Harris slams the lack of support from other powerful Democrats like Governor Newsom. “Hiking. Will call back,” Harris recalls Newsom responding in a text when she reached out asking for his help.

Harris goes on to lament the lack of talent among those considered to be her running mate, claiming Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) was overly ambitious and interacted poorly with her staff. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), according to Harris, was too anti-union to make the cut, while Pete Buttigieg was too gay. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) was eventually picked since he posed the least political threat to Harris in the long term.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kamala Confirms Walz Was a Diversity Hire, Wanted Buttigieg.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has revealed Pete Buttigieg was her first choice for running mate but deemed it “too big of a risk.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Tim Walz.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Excerpt from Harris’s upcoming book 107 Days, set to release September 23.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.” – Kamala Harris

🎯IMPACT: Harris ultimately chose Tim Walz as her running mate, losing to President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in the election.

IN FULL

Pete Buttigieg was former Vice President Kamala Harris‘s “first choice” to be her running mate in the 2024 presidential election. The choice of Buttigieg—the homosexual former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, McKinsey consultant, former Secretary of Transportation, and Naval Reserve intelligence officer—was revealed in a newly released excerpt from Harris’s upcoming book, 107 Days, which recalls her disastrous presidential campaign.

Despite Harris’s preference for Buttigieg, she settled on Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) instead, concluding that Buttigieg “was too big of a risk.” Harris wrote that Buttigieg, “would have been an ideal partner—if I were a straight white man.” She added, “But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man.”

“Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk,” Harris wrote. “And I think Pete also knew that—to our mutual sadness.” Harris and Walz, effectively a straight white male diversity hire, went on to lose the 2024 presidential election in a landslide to President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in November.

The excerpt also revealed that Buttigieg initially led Harris’s vetting list for running mates. Harris described him as “a sincere public servant with the rare talent of being able to frame liberal arguments in a way that makes it possible for conservatives to hear them.” She added, “I love Pete. I love working with Pete. He and his husband, Chasten, are friends.”

It is unclear whether Harris’s vetting of Buttigieg uncovered the former Transportation Secretary‘s ties to Patrick Wojahn, a former Democrat mayor of College Park, Maryland, who was sentenced in 2023 to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to dozens of charges relating to the possession of child pornography. The 30-year sentence (150 in total with 120 years suspended) comes after Wojahn reached an agreement with prosecutors, pleading guilty in August to 140 counts related to the possession and distribution of materials depicting child sexual abuse.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kamala Now Says Biden Was ‘Reckless’ to Seek Re-Election, Claims She Was ‘Hypnotized.’

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Former Vice President Kamala Harris criticized the Democratic Party’s decision to leave former President Joe Biden’s reelection bid up to his discretion, calling it “recklessness” in her new book.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, and the Bidens’ inner circle.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Harris’s comments appear in her new book 107 Days, to be released on September 23, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness.” – Kamala Harris

🎯IMPACT: Harris’s remarks mark a rare public critique of Biden’s campaign decisions and highlight ongoing internal tensions within the Democratic Party.

IN FULL

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has described the decision to allow then-President Joe Biden to determine whether to seek reelection in 2024 as “recklessness,” according to an excerpt from her new book, 107 Days, published in The Atlantic. Harris reflects on the discussions surrounding Biden’s decision to run for a second term, stating, “Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness.”

“‘It’s Joe and Jill’s decision.’ We all said that, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized,” Harris wrote.

Biden, who was 81 at the time, eventually dropped out of the race in July 2024 following a catastrophic debate performance against Donald J. Trump, in which he appeared cognitively impaired. This resulted in Harris being installed as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee without a primary contest. She ultimately lost the election in a landslide to Trump, who became only the second American in the country’s history to serve two non-consecutive terms in office.

Harris criticized the Democrats’ decision-making process, writing, “This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.” Nevertheless, Harris continues to defend Biden’s ability to govern in the book, despite acknowledging his struggles with fatigue during the campaign.

She writes, “On his worst day, he was more deeply knowledgeable, more capable of exercising judgment, and far more compassionate than Donald Trump on his best. But at 81, Joe got tired. That’s when his age showed in physical and verbal stumbles.” She attributes his debate challenges to exhaustion from a demanding travel schedule.

Harris also accuses Biden’s inner circle of fueling negative narratives about her tenure as Vice President, including stories about her office being in disarray. She claims the then-President’s staff was “adding fuel to negative narratives” and even sought to diminish her success, citing an instance where the Biden White House was displeased with a speech she gave in Selma, Alabama, that went viral. “I was castigated for, apparently, delivering it too well,” Harris writes.

The book underscores Harris’s belief that her success would have reflected positively on Biden, particularly given concerns about his age. “My success was important for him,” she writes. “His team didn’t get it.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kamala Harris Launches ‘Global Tour’ for Book No One Wants to Read.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former Vice President Kamala Harris announced a 15-city book tour to promote her upcoming memoir, 107 Days.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, Simon & Schuster, and several independent bookstores.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The tour begins September 24 and ends in late November, spanning cities including New York, San Francisco, Toronto, and London.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Over the next few months, I will travel our country to share behind-the-scenes moments, lessons learned, and how we keep moving forward together.”  — Kamala Harris

🎯IMPACT: The tour will spark further speculation about Harris’s political future, including a potential 2028 presidential run.

IN FULL

Kamala Harris, the former vice president and failed Democratic presidential candidate, has announced a 15-city book tour to promote her memoir, 107 Days. The book covers her 2024 campaign after former President Joe Biden was forced to drop out of the race. The tour will begin on September 24, one day after the book’s release, and conclude in late November at Miami’s Ziff Opera House. Stops include major cities such as New York, San Francisco, Toronto, and London.

Harris made the announcement in a post on X (formerly Twitter) with a video featuring clips from the 2024 presidential campaign trail. The memoir, which Harris described as “a journal,” recounts her brief, disastrous presidential run. “107 Days is my candid and personal account of the shortest presidential campaign in modern history,” Harris wrote. “Over the next few months, I will travel our country to share behind-the-scenes moments, lessons learned, and how we keep moving forward together.”

According to Simon & Schuster, the events will allow Harris to share her experiences and insights while engaging with audiences in theaters and music halls.

The tour will include partnerships with small, independent bookstores in several cities, and Harris reportedly expanded the itinerary to include less traditional stops such as Portland, Oregon, and Durham, North Carolina. A source familiar with Harris’ plans hinted at potential surprise visits in addition to the scheduled events.

Some stops include conservative-leaning states like Texas, Tennessee, and Alabama, and the tour has fueled speculation about Harris’ political ambitions. The National Pulse reported in late July that Harris will forego a run for California governor in 2026, emphasizing her desire to travel across the country and engage with people.

Two sources close to Harris have suggested she is keeping her options open for a 2028 presidential run.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Hunter: Joe’s Disastrous 2024 Debate Caused by Old Age and a Prescription Sedative.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Hunter Biden claims his father, former President Joe Biden, may have still been experiencing the effects of the prescription sedative Ambien during his campaign-ending debate performance against President Donald J. Trump in June 2024.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hunter Biden, interviewer Andrew Callaghan, and Joe Biden.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Hunter Biden made the claim during an interview that aired on Monday, July 21, 2025.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “I’ll tell you what, I know exactly what happened in that debate. He [Joe Biden] flew around the world basically—the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He’s 81 years old, he’s tired as shit. They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage, and he looks like he’s a deer in the headlights.” — Hunter Biden

🎯IMPACT: The former president’s son appeared to confirm that Joe Biden’s disastrous June 2024 debate performance was the result of old age and a prescription sedative.

Hunter Biden revealed his father, former President Joe Biden, may have still been experiencing the effects of the prescription sedative Ambien during his campaign-ending debate performance against President Donald J. Trump in June 2024. The son of the former president made the claim during a lengthy interview with social media personality Andrew Callaghan on his YouTube-hosted Channel 5 talk show.

“I’ll tell you what, I know exactly what happened in that debate. He [Joe Biden] flew around the world basically—the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He’s 81 years old, he’s tired as shit. They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage, and he looks like he’s a deer in the headlights,” Hunter Biden claims, continuing: “And it feeds into every fucking story that anybody wants to tell. And Jake Tapper—with literally how many anonymous sources… if this was a conspiracy, Andrew, you know this, somehow the entirety of a White House—in which you’re literally living on top of each other—has kept their mouth shut about… you know… like what… what’s the conspiracy? That Joe Biden got old? Yeah, he got old. He got old before our eyes.”


The former president’s son goes on to note that the lack of support from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) allowed opposition to Biden’s re-election campaign post-debate to fester until he was forced to withdraw. However, importantly, Hunter Biden appears to confirm that his father was not only under the influence of a prescription sedative prior to the June debate, but that old age was, in fact, hampering his ability to run for re-election.

Notably, former President Joe Biden’s White House physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, has refused to testify before the House Oversight Committee regarding allegations that his boss suffered from cognitive decline while occupying the White House. The National Pulse previously reported that Dr. O’Connor abruptly left the hearing after pleading the Fifth. Two other senior Biden White House aides, Annie Tomasini and Anthony Bernal, have also refused to answer the committee’s questions, opting to plead the Fifth instead.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more