Monday, February 23, 2026

Even The Atlantic Magazine Is Now Out AGAINST Child ‘Trans’ Genital Mutilation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Even the globalists at The Atlantic are publicly admitting medical and scientific research does not support claims made by pro-transgender advocacy groups in support of surgical and hormonal gender transition procedures for minors.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Atlantic, staff writer Helen Lewis, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), GLAAD, and children.

📍WHEN & WHERE: February 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Today, though, the future of medical transition for minors is up for debate.” — The Atlantic 

🎯IMPACT: Unfortunately, the medical association’s recommendation changes—and a change in tune from some among the globalist elite—will come too little, too late for many of the children who have been subjected to irreversible surgical and chemical alterations.

IN FULL

Even the globalists at The Atlantic are publicly admitting medical and scientific research does not support claims made by pro-transgender advocacy groups in support of surgical and hormonal gender transition procedures for minor children. In the wake of a landmark lawsuit in New York State, which saw detransitioner Fox Varian awarded $2 million in damages for essentially being enabled and groomed by their doctor, major American medical trade associations are reversing course on their endorsement of invasive and often irreversible medical procedures for legal minors who claim to be transgender.

“Today, though, the future of medical transition for minors is up for debate,” staff writer Helen Lewis for The Atlantic declares, noting that the appeals to authority touted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and GLAAD in support of youth gender transition have collapsed in recent weeks. In early February, two of the medical associations most often cited by progressive and pro-transgender groups announced they now recommend invasive genital, breast, and facial structure surgeries be delayed until adulthood.

“ASPS recommends that surgeons delay gender-related breast/chest, genital, and facial surgery until a patient is at least 19 years old,” the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) announced on February 3. The Atlantic‘s Lewis notes ASPS’s position was almost immediately endorsed and echoed by the powerful American Medical Association (AMA), which stated, “In the absence of clear evidence, the A.M.A. agrees with A.S.P.S. that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.”

Importantly, the ASPS document announcing their shift in recommendations embraces the findings of the Cass Review and a 2025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) inquiry—both of which found little scientific and medical evidence for the use of invasive procedures to gender transition minors. Still, the recommendation changes—and a change in tune from some among the globalist elite—will come too little too late for many of the children who have been subjected to irreversible surgical and chemical alterations.

Image by Silar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Major American Medical Trade Association Will NOT Recommend Gender Surgeries for Minors.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) is breaking rank with most U.S. medical associations over its stance on surgical procedures and hormone treatments for minors seeking gender transition. ASPS, with over 11,000 members across the United States and Canada, announced quietly in late July that it “has not endorsed any organization’s practice recommendations for the treatment of adolescents with gender dysphoria.”

ASPS’s decision effectively rejects the current consensus among medical trade associations—which many critics argue are captured by proponents of gender ideology. The trade group decision comes amidst member concerns regarding the lack of information on the long-term impact of gender transition surgeries and hormone replacement therapy. According to ASPS, there is “considerable uncertainty as to the long-term efficacy for the use of chest and genital surgical interventions.”

Additionally, the group states that “existing evidence base is viewed as low quality/low certainty.” The move comes amidst the release of the state-sponsored Cass Review in Britain, which contends the current medical consensus on gender dysphoria and minors is not based on scientific and medical expertise but on the opinions of non-governmental organizations like the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) which pushes gender ideology as part of its mission.

Following the Cass Review and several medical studies, numerous countries in Europe abruptly ended gender transition procedures for children. W

There is growing evidence that the procedures do not produce the mental or physical health outcomes purported by those who push gender ideology, and growing concern in the medical community about the long-term risk o malpractice suits.

The legal impacts of transition procedures—especially if additional research suggests little to no medical positives—could see additional associations join the ASPS.

Image by Ross Burgess.

show less
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) is breaking rank with most U.S. medical associations over its stance on surgical procedures and hormone treatments for minors seeking gender transition. ASPS, with over 11,000 members across the United States and Canada, announced quietly in late July that it "has not endorsed any organization’s practice recommendations for the treatment of adolescents with gender dysphoria." show more