Monday, February 23, 2026

Foreign-Born Biden Judge Blocks Move Towards Deporting 350k Haitians.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Biden-appointed judge blocked President Trump’s attempt to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 350,000 Haitian migrants, citing a novel interpretation of the law.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Judge Ana Reyes, President Joe Biden, President Donald J. Trump, Haitian migrants, and pro-migration groups like FWD.us.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued recently in Washington, D.C., affecting Haitian migrants residing across the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is lawless activism. Temporary means temporary and the final word will not be from an activist judge legislating from the bench.” – Tricia McLaughlin, DHS spokeswoman

🎯IMPACT: The ruling delays Trump’s efforts to enforce immigration laws, prolongs the stay of illegal migrants, and benefits employers seeking low-wage labor.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes, appointed by former President Joe Biden, has issued a ruling temporarily halting the Trump administration’s effort to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 350,000 Haitian nationals. Judge Reyes, a Harvard-educated Uruguayan immigrant, admitted that the TPS statute limits judicial review of the substantive decisions on country designations, but argued she could intervene regardless to examine whether the administrative process followed proper procedures.

However, in her 83-page opinion, Reyes asserted that the Department of Homeland Security’s termination decision, set to take effect on February 3, 2026, appeared to disregard evidence about conditions in Haiti, and alleged the decision may have been influenced by bias against non-white immigrants—clearly appearing to make a value judgment rather than taking issue with the administrative process.

She also claimed that many Haitians with TPS are well-integrated and skilled workers who will be reluctant to return to their own country due to Haiti’s governance challenges. “A stay is in the public interest… Haitian TPS holders substantially benefit the U.S. economy, contributing approximately $3.4 billion annually,” she insisted, appearing to substitute her own opinions for those of the elected President and his administration.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin sharply criticized the decision as “lawless activism,” stressing: “Haiti’s TPS was granted following an earthquake over 15 years ago. It was never intended to be a de facto amnesty program.”

Trump immigration advisor Stephen Miller also condemned the ruling, noting: “An unelected judge has just ruled that elections, laws, and borders don’t exist.”

The underlying lawsuit received support from the pro-immigration organization FWD.us, which was established by tech investors and business leaders advocating for policies that allow employers to exploit low-wage migrant labor at the expense of American workers.

Image by Katrin Bolovtsova.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Federal Judge Finds Trump’s Firing of Inspectors General Unlawful—But Still Upholds Dismissals.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge ruled that President Donald J. Trump violated a law requiring 30 days’ notice to Congress before firing inspectors general, but upheld the dismissals.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes, and eight former inspectors general.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Wednesday by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

💬KEY QUOTE: “President Trump violated the [Inspectors General Act]. That much is obvious. And Plaintiffs raise compelling arguments that the violation must be remedied through reinstatement to their positions,” wrote Judge Ana Reyes.

🎯IMPACT: The inspectors general remain dismissed, but Judge Reyes has yet to rule on whether they should receive back pay.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes, a Joe Biden appointee, ruled that President Donald J. Trump violated the Inspectors General Act by failing to provide Congress with a 30-day notice before firing inspectors general. Despite this violation, Reyes upheld the dismissals, citing a lack of irreparable harm to the plaintiffs.

The lawsuit was brought by eight of the 17 inspectors general dismissed by Trump earlier this year. Reyes stated in her decision, “President Trump violated the [Inspectors General Act]. That much is obvious. And Plaintiffs raise compelling arguments that the violation must be remedied through reinstatement to their positions.”

However, Reyes noted that under established case law, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. She added, “Even assuming that the IGA comports with Article II, Plaintiffs’ inability to perform their duties for 30 days is not irreparable harm. Moreover, if the IGs were reinstated, the President could lawfully remove them after 30 days by providing the required notice and rationale to Congress.”

The judge denied the request for an injunction to reinstate the inspectors general. However, Reyes has not yet ruled on whether the plaintiffs should receive back pay, requesting additional briefings on the matter.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more