Monday, February 23, 2026

UK Judge Sides With Asylum Seeker Linked to Easter Bombings That Killed Hundreds.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An asylum seeker linked to the Easter Sunday bombings in Sri Lanka in 2019 successfully appealed the British Home Office’s rejection of his asylum claim.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The asylum seeker, identified only as ‘YA,’ and Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Claire Burns.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued recently at the Immigration Upper Tribunal in Birmingham, England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I find there will need to be a complete rehearing wherein the Judge will make findings about the credibility of [YA’s] account,” Burns ruled.

🎯IMPACT: The case will be reheard, allowing a fresh examination of the asylum seeker’s claims.

IN FULL

A migrant who was previously arrested in connection with the Easter Sunday bombings in Sri Lanka in 2019 has won an appeal against the British Home Office’s rejection of his asylum application. The attacks, which took the lives of 269 people at churches and hotels, including American and British citizens, were claimed by the Islamic State.

Identified only as ‘YA,’ the migrant successfully challenged the decision at the Immigration Upper Tribunal in Birmingham. Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Claire Burns claimed there were significant legal flaws in the initial decision to reject his claim. “I find there will need to be a complete rehearing wherein the Judge will make findings about the credibility of [YA’s] account,” she ruled.

Immigration judges in Britain, which grants asylum to migrants at a much higher rate than comparable European countries such as France and Germany, are in many cases known activists with a strong bias towards granting applications on the flimsiest pretexts, with dozens having ties to pro-open borders nonprofits.

The “YA” comes amid a record surge in asylum applications in the United Kingdom. According to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data, Britain received 108,000 asylum claims in 2024, the highest ever recorded and a 28 percent increase from the previous year. Illegal crossings of the English Channel also rose, with 44,000 reported attempts. Whistleblowers have warned that the current system has, in some instances, approved migrants known to have prior convictions or serious allegations against them, including for sexual assault.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Reexamining Biden’s Afghan Migrants After DC Shooting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is “actively re-examining” Afghan nationals who entered the U.S. during Joe Biden’s presidency after one of them allegedly shot two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, President Donald J. Trump, and Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on December 1 during a White House press briefing, following the shootings in Washington, D.C., last week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Any individual who threatens our national security or our citizenry will be subject to removal,” said Leavitt.

🎯IMPACT: The review could see thousands of Afghans lose their current status or even face deportation if they are found to be inadequately vetted or a threat to the public.

IN FULL

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on Monday that the Trump administration is “actively re-examining” all Afghan nationals who entered the United States under former President Joe Biden, a decision prompted by a deadly shooting in Washington, D.C., involving a recently arrived Afghan national.

Leavitt pointed to the case of 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, accused of shooting two National Guardsmen, one of whom has died, as the immediate reason for the renewed scrutiny. “Any individual who threatens our national security or our citizenry will be subject to removal,” she said during the press briefing.

Leavitt also reiterated that President Donald J. Trump has “permanently paused the migration of foreign nationals from Third World countries that pose a very high risk to the United States.” Leavitt went on to fault previous administrations for what she described as “self-destructive immigration policies,” saying they admitted migrants who “outright hate our country and have no interest in assimilating into our culture.”

The D.C. shooting has revived political debate over the large influx of Afghan asylum seekers who arrived in the United States after the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan. Thousands were brought in under expedited resettlement programs, with many temporarily placed in facilities across the country, including a Virginia conference center situated in a residential neighborhood near two public schools. The scale and speed of the relocation efforts sparked criticism from opponents who questioned the adequacy of vetting procedures and raised concerns about the Afghans’ long-term integration.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Man Accused of Easter Bombings That Killed Hundreds Claims Asylum in Britain.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Sri Lankan national, suspected of involvement in the country’s Easter Sunday bombings in 2019, is in the United Kingdom seeking asylum.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The asylum seeker, Sri Lankan authorities, and the British government.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The bombings occurred in April 2019 in Sri Lanka, while the asylum case is ongoing in Britain as of November 2025.

🎯IMPACT: The case will return to a first-tier tribunal for a full reassessment of the evidence, with no facts from the previous decision preserved.

IN FULL

A Sri Lankan man, granted anonymity for legal reasons, is seeking asylum in Britain after being accused of involvement in the Easter Sunday bombings in his country in 2019, which killed 269 people, including eight British citizens. The coordinated suicide attacks targeted three churches and three luxury hotels in Colombo, leaving hundreds dead and injured.

Sri Lankan authorities arrested him in January 2022 on suspicion of links to the attacks, but he was later released on bail. He then fled to the United Kingdom with his wife, arguing that he would face persecution if returned to Sri Lanka. The British Home Office rejected his asylum claim in April 2024, and an appeal was dismissed in March 2025.

Representing himself, he claimed the initial immigration tribunal judge was biased and had failed to properly assess important evidence, including inconsistencies between a Wikipedia entry and official police documents. Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Claire Burns found that the earlier decision did contain legal mistakes, but rejected his accusation of bias, stating, “I find that there is no merit in this ground whatsoever.” Burns ordered the case to return to the first-tier tribunal for a complete rehearing, with none of the previous findings preserved.

The 2019 bombings have been attributed to Islamist extremist groups believed to have ties to the Islamic State, and the dead included Christians, tourists, and children.

The case comes as the United Kingdom faces unprecedented pressure on its asylum system. Government statistics show that asylum applications reached a record high of more than 111,000 in the year ending June 2025, a 14 percent rise compared with the previous year. A whistleblower from within the Home Office has claimed that some applicants accused of serious crimes, including sexual offences, have been granted asylum, alleging that staff were sometimes pressured to approve claims, including for a claimant who “posed a threat to children.”

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

The British Govt is FINALLY Proposing Asylum Reforms. Here’s Their Plan…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, supposedly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Labour Party, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Reform Party leader Nigel Farage, and asylum seekers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.” — Keir Starmer

🎯IMPACT: While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics suggest that the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for migrants to claim asylum could see the number of migrants overall remain the same or even rise, even if arrivals by sea and other clandestine means decrease. 

IN FULL

The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, ostensibly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain. The changes were unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend, with Starmer stating: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.”

Labour’s leadership is billing the changes as the most comprehensive and sweeping in the history of modern Britain. Asylum seekers, under the new policies, will face a quadrupled length of time before they can receive permanent settlement in the United Kingdom. Additionally, refugee status will now only be temporary.

According to Starmer and Mahmood, the current system allows so-called refugees to abuse Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to essentially delay indefinitely their removal from the United Kingdom. The Labour government is seeking to enact new laws that clarify the meaning of a “family connection” which will legally limit the term to only a direct family member, such as a parent or child. In addition, the United Kingdom is seeking a multi-country review of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ definition of torture, arguing it is too expansive and is being used to claim asylum status where it truly isn’t applicable.

While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics note that they include the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for asylum seekers, and could result in the number of migrants overall remaining the same or even rising, even if the number of illegal boat migrants falls.

Election polls consistently show Brexit-leader Nigel Farage‘s Reform Party outpacing Labour for a majority in Parliament, putting Farage himself on pace to be the United Kingdom’s next prime minister.

Notably, Farage’s popularity has soared in most part because of his outspoken stance on immigration and the need for drastic changes to the United Kingdom’s asylum laws. The data also backs Farage, with immigration and asylum reform consistently being the top issues for Britons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Europe Is on the Brink of Recognizing Polygamy in Muslim ‘Human Rights’ Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Yemeni migrant is suing the Netherlands over the refusal to allow his children from two additional wives to join him, raising the issue of polygamy before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Khaled Al-Anesi, a Yemeni asylum seeker, Dutch authorities, and the European Court of Human Rights.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The case stems from Al-Anesi being granted asylum in the Netherlands in 2011; his case is before the ECtHR right now.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Europe doesn’t have to commit this cultural suicide. It’s time to leave the [European Convention on Human Rights].” – Former British Home Secretary Suella Braverman

🎯IMPACT: The case could set a precedent for effectively legalising polygamy in Europe, sparking concerns about the erosion of traditional cultural values.

IN FULL

Europe may soon face a historic legal shift as the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) prepares to rule on whether polygamous families should be recognized under European law. The case involves Khaled Al-Anesi, a Yemeni asylum seeker who was granted refuge in the Netherlands in 2011. Al-Anesi successfully brought his first wife and their eight children to the country under family-reunification rules, but now seeks to bring his two other wives and five additional children, who remain in Turkey.

Dutch authorities rejected his request, citing the nation’s prohibition of polygamy and the fact that the children are already living with their mothers in stable conditions. Officials reportedly suggested that he divorce his other wives to facilitate family reunification, but he refused. Al-Anesi has since sued the Dutch government, claiming it violated his right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which is enforced by the supranational European Court of Human Rights, which is technically separate from the European Union (EU) and still has jursidiction over the United Kingdom.

Notably, the case marks the first time the Court has agreed to examine polygamy within Europe, and its ruling could set a far-reaching precedent for all member states. Former British Home Secretary Suella Braverman condemned the potential implications of the case, warning, “Europe doesn’t have to commit this cultural suicide. It’s time to leave the ECHR.”

The debate comes amid growing concern about the Islamization of Europe. Reports indicate that the United Kingdom, for instance, now hosts around 85 sharia courts and more than 100,000 Islamic marriages not formally registered with the state. Critics argue that such developments erode Western legal norms and could pave the way for a de facto parallel legal system.

Image by Marcello Casal Jr/ABr.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Praises Hungary, Warns Migrants Are ‘Flooding Europe’ and Driving Crime Waves.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump met Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán at the White House and praised his immigration policies.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Viktor Orbán, and European Union leaders.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting took place at the White House on Friday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Look what’s happened to Europe with the immigration. They have people flooding Europe all over the place. And it’s hurting it. The crime rates are way up,” said Trump.

🎯IMPACT: Hungary faces European Union (EU) sanctions for its strict immigration policies, while Trump reiterated his support for Orbán.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump praised the immigration restrictions imposed by Hungary during a meeting with the country’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, at the White House on Friday. The America First leader argued that the European Union (EU) should respect the measures taken by Orbán “very strongly, because he’s been right on immigration.” Trump emphasized, “Look what’s happened to Europe with the immigration. They have people flooding Europe all over the place. And it’s hurting it. The crime rates are way up. A lot of bad things are happening. His crime rates are very low. They’re the same as they always were, which is very little crime. Because he’s kept it the way it should be.”

During the meeting, Trump added, “He was right on immigration. They were wrong. They are flooding Europe with people from all over the world. And Europe is becoming a different place. And I tell the leaders all the time, ‘You better stop or you’re not going to have Europe anymore.’ It’s a very dangerous thing they’re doing.”

Prime Minister Orbán provided further details on his country’s policy, stating, “On migration… just for clarification, in Hungary, the number of illegal migration is like that—zero, zero because we have a crystal-clear system. If somebody would like to come to Hungary, first he should ask for that. If he [gets] permission, they can step in. Nobody can step on the territory of Hungary without having permission from the Hungarian authorities. This is the regulation.”

Orbán also highlighted the consequences Hungary faces for its stance, saying, “What is the consequence of that? We are under sanctions, financial sanctions of [the] European Union, because we don’t let the illegal [immigrants] come to Hungary and to the European Union as well. So we have to pay, just to inform you, we have to pay every day €1 million as a punishment… this is the absurd world we are living now in Europe.”

Notably, the European Union’s top court ordered Hungary to pay a $223 million fine in June 2024 for depriving migrants of their right to apply for asylum, alongside an additional fine of 1 million euros per day for non-compliance. Trump continued his praise for Orbán, stating, “Viktor’s had a very hard stance on more than anything else, immigration or even illegal immigration. He literally has accepted no one over the years. Think of how much greater these countries would be if they didn’t have the tremendous crime that has come in with the immigration, people just flowing into Europe. They’ve got to stop it and not only stop it, they have to reverse it. They have to get them out.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Britain Is Granting Asylum to Known Predators: Whistleblower.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A whistleblower at Britain’s Home Office, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, has revealed that migrants charged with serious crimes, including sex offences, are being granted asylum.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: A Home Office caseworker, Afghan asylum seekers, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, and Home Office officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The allegations have surfaced amidst an ongoing review of the British asylum system in 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I said: ‘I’m refusing. He’s a wrong ’un.’ And my senior manager said we can’t refuse an Afghan, we’ve got to grant.” – Home Office whistleblower.

🎯IMPACT: The whistleblower’s revelations underline the systemic issues in the British asylum process, with soaring application numbers and concerns over public safety.

IN FULL

A whistleblower at Britain’s Home Office, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, has revealed that migrants accused of serious crimes, including sexual offenses, are being granted asylum in Britain. The caseworker stated that officials are approving asylum applications from migrants who have committed or been accused of crimes that would attract a prison sentence of less than 12 months if committed in Britain.

The whistleblower said she faced disciplinary action after refusing the asylum application of an Afghan man accused of repeatedly exposing himself in a children’s play area. “I said: ‘I’m refusing. He’s a wrong ’un.’ And my senior manager said we can’t refuse an Afghan, we’ve got to grant,” she said. “I was refusing that man because… I believed he posed a threat to children, but he was never going to receive a jail sentence for indecent exposure, he was just getting repeated warnings.”

She also revealed that caseworkers are being pressured to approve more claims, with applications from some countries, such as Sudan and Eritrea, being fast-tracked with less scrutiny. She described the situation as “lose-lose” for staff, saying employees are caught between pressure from senior officials and public criticism over excessively generous decisions.

The revelations come as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood prepares to announce reforms to the asylum system, including stricter rules for migrants with criminal records and measures which will supposedly prevent people using human rights laws to avoid deportation as often as they do at present. Mahmood, of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, has acknowledged that the Home Office is “not yet fit for purpose.”

Asylum claims in the United Kingdom have reached record highs, with 111,000 applications submitted in the year to June 2025, a 14 percent rise compared with the previous year. In the same period, 37,000 migrants arrived in Britain by small boat alone, an increase of 17 percent on 2024.

The financial burden of accommodating asylum seekers has also drawn criticism. Reports have estimated that housing asylum seekers costs UK taxpayers around £15 million every day, with many placed in hotels due to shortages of permanent accommodation. Hundreds of migrants living in taxpayer-funded hotels have been charged with serious offences, including rape and assault.

In one case, the government reportedly paid more than $600 to a convicted pedophile migrant, previously released from prison in error, to persuade him to cooperate with his deportation.

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kurdish Crime Network Helps Illegals Run Mini-Marts, Sell Black Market Cigarettes to Kids.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Kurdish crime network has been found enabling migrants to work illegally in mini-marts across the United Kingdom.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kurdish crime network, BBC undercover reporters, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, and “ghost directors” like Hadi Ahmad Ali and Ismael Ahmedi Farzanda.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation spans various locations from Dundee, Scotland, to south Devon, England, as reported on November 5, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Illegal immigrants are running phoney mini-marts selling smuggled cigarettes and even vapes to children. Our high streets are being used for organised crime, and the government is looking the other way.” – Zia Yusuf, Reform Party

🎯IMPACT: Britain’s Home Office has pledged to investigate the findings and address illegal working and organized crime linked to immigration.

IN FULL

An investigation has uncovered a Kurdish organized criminal network that allows asylum seekers to illegally operate mini-marts on Britain’s high streets, generating profits from black market cigarettes and vapes, some of them sold to children, while evading law enforcement. At the core of the operation are so-called “ghost directors”—individuals paid to act as nominal owners, registering dozens of businesses without any actual involvement in their day-to-day running.

Two undercover journalists, posing as asylum seekers interested in taking over shops, were shown just how straightforward it is to acquire and manage one of these outlets and make substantial earnings from contraband sales. The investigation has tied more than 100 mini-marts, barbershops, and car washes to the scheme, spanning from Dundee in Scotland to Devon in south-west England. Financial crime expert Graham Barrow told the BBC that he believes the scam likely involves hundreds of additional sites.

The report has laid bare a system that enables asylum seekers to work without permits in plain sight amid everyday shoppers, with many stores relying heavily on illegal tobacco and vaping products for revenue. One shop owner told the undercover reporters that his weekly takings from illicit cigarettes could reach “sometimes, up to £3,000.” The ghost directors typically command fees of £250 to £300 a month simply for lending their names to the paperwork.

To avoid detection, these companies are frequently wound up after about a year and then restarted with minor adjustments to their details. Over the course of four months, investigators found a range of illicit practices: asylum seekers offering to sell entire shops for £18,000 in cash; active Kurdish Facebook groups advertising dozens of businesses for sale; and builders promoting sophisticated £6,000 concealment devices, such as button-activated loft dispensers for hiding stock, which they touted as “fine craftsmanship” capable of fooling sniffer dogs. Many asylum seekers end up working punishing 14-hour shifts for as less than the minimum wage.

One key example came from Crewe’s Top Store, where the owner, known as Surchi—a Kurdish asylum seeker from Iraq’s Kurdistan region whose claim was rejected after he arrived in 2022—offered to sell his business to an undercover reporter for £18,000. “You don’t need anything” to run it, he insisted, despite rules that prohibit asylum seekers from such employment. Surchi revealed he paid a contact called “Hadi” £250 each month to front the business: “That’s his job and he probably has 40 to 50 shops under his name. There’s no problem, he doesn’t mind what you sell.” This arrangement helped him avoid immigration scrutiny and tax payments. He also had a device on the premises allowing him to steal electricity.

He admitted to selling vapes to children, saying, “I have customers that are 12 years old, I don’t have any problem with them.” Company records highlight Hadi Ahmad Ali, an Iraqi man in his forties based in Birmingham, England, as a key figure, listed as director for more than 50 such businesses. He is closely linked to Ismaeel Farzanda, who oversees around 25 shops and took over the directorship of seven from Ali.

Farzanda described his role bluntly to the undercover reporter: “I just put the shops under my name for people.” He added a warning about potential busts: “If you know you’re caught, tell us so that for the interviews we can change the name and not get in trouble.”

“Absolutely scandalous,” commented Zia Yusuf, for Nigel Farage’s Reform Party. “Illegal immigrants are running phoney mini-marts selling smuggled cigarettes and even vapes to children. Our high streets are being used for organised crime, and the government is looking the other way.”

“It’s time these sham businesses were shut down and these criminals deported,” he added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Asylum Claims Surge to Highest Number Ever in Britain.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Britain recorded 108,000 asylum applications in 2024, marking the highest number ever, according to new Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour government, Border Force personnel, and asylum seekers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The data covers 2024, with the United Kingdom surpassing previous records and facing increased crossings of the English Channel by boat migrants.

🎯IMPACT: The figures add to the ongoing migration crisis in Britain, with rising crossings and public demand for stricter deportation measures.

IN FULL

Britain has recorded the highest number of asylum claims in Europe, as new figures reveal a record 108,000 applications were made in 2024. The data, released by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), shows a 28 percent increase from the previous year’s 84,000, marking the largest total ever documented in the United Kingdom. The previous peak was in 2002, when 103,000 people sought asylum.

While Britain’s numbers surged, several European neighbours experienced declines. Germany, traditionally one of the largest destinations for asylum seekers, saw applications fall by nearly 100,000 to around 230,000. France also reported a decrease, while Spain and Italy received 164,000 and 151,000 claims, respectively. Although both totals were higher than Britain’s in absolute terms, their growth rates were far lower.

The OECD also reported around 44,000 unauthorised attempts to enter the United Kingdom in 2024, mostly through small boat crossings of the English Channel. That figure was up from 37,000 in 2023. Pakistani nationals accounted for the largest group of asylum seekers, submitting more than 10,000 applications, followed by Afghans and Iranians, who each filed over 8,000 claims.

The surge in migration has intensified pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s leftist Labour government, which faces growing criticism over its handling of border control. The situation has worsened over 2025, with more than 35,000 migrants crossing the Channel, a 25 percent rise compared to the same period last year.

Broader migration trends continue to stir public concern. Former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick warned in 2024 that “mass immigration is crushing national prosperity, not raising it,” stressing that the pace of arrivals is placing a serious strain on housing and public services. Official data indicate that Britain’s population grew by more than 750,000 in the year to mid-2024, with net migration accounting for almost all of that increase.

The recent appointment of far-left Muslim Shabana Mahmood as Home Secretary, roughly equivalent to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary, in September 2025 has also drawn attention. Her promotion places her in charge of border security and migration policy, though some commentators have described her as a figure whose priorities may focus more on leftist ideas like “social justice” than immigration enforcement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Slashes Refugee Cap to Historic Low of 7,500, Most Places Going to Afrikaners.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump set the refugee admissions ceiling at 7,500 for fiscal year 2026, the lowest cap on record.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Afrikaners in South Africa, and U.S. government officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Determination dated September 30, announced in Washington, D.C.

🎯IMPACT: This decision shifts U.S. refugee policy, focusing on Afrikaners and potentially others, while slashing the annual refugee cap.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has set the refugee admissions ceiling for the 2026 fiscal year at 7,500, the lowest limit in U.S. history. The presidential determination, dated September 30, focuses on admitting South African Afrikaners, a white ethnic minority, citing persecution in their home country. The previous cap, set by former President Joe Biden, was 125,000.

When Trump returned to office in January, he immediately paused all refugee admissions, saying the program would resume only if it served “the best interest of the United States.” The administration soon began prioritizing Afrikaners for resettlement, though only 138 South Africans had been admitted by early September, according to official data. The new refugee plan also extends consideration to “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands.” A leaked internal memo from April suggested that Europeans facing discrimination for opposing mass migration or supporting populist parties could also qualify.

The new refugee limits come amid a broader tightening of immigration enforcement. Southern border crossings have dropped to their lowest level in 55 years, with around 237,000 apprehensions reported this fiscal year, a decline of more than 80 percent. At the U.S.-Canada border, illegal crossings have fallen by roughly 95 percent following a major security crackdown earlier in 2025.

Meanwhile, deportations have accelerated. Federal immigration authorities report that the United States is on track to reach roughly 600,000 removals by the end of the year. Since January 2025, more than half a million illegal immigrants have been deported, and officials say voluntary departures have also risen sharply.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more