A small group of Illinois voters, backed by the the leftist law-fare nonprofit ‘Free Speech for People’, has filed a petition with the state board of elections asking that former President Donald Trump be removed from the Republican primary ballot. The petition claims the former Republican president is barred from office under the ‘insurrection’ clause found in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Democrat operatives have pushed the ‘insurrection’ clause claim in several states with mixed results. The Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled that Trump is ineligible to run for President, citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, however both the Minnesota and Michigan supreme courts threw out similar cases. The United States Supreme Court is widely expected to step in and overturn the Colorado decision.
The Petitioners.
The petitioners include a far-left professor of English & Latin American and Latino Studies to a local Chicago lawyer. One of the petitioners, Prof. Ralph Cintrón of the University of Illinois Chicago, has a long track record of far-left work — especially pertaining to mass immigration. Speaking at Penn State last year, Prof. Cintrón lamented the lack of representation for illegal immigrants in America. Steven Daniel Anderson, Charles J. Holley, Jack L Hickman, and Darryl P. Baker joined Cintrón in signing the petition.
The petitioners are being represented by Chicago civil rights and constitutional law attorney Matthew Piers, president of Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. Piers is a prolific donor to Democrat candidates across the country. A review of Federal Election Commission records reveals he frequently makes significant contributions to far-left progressives, including Rep. Chuy García (D-IL), former Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, Rep. Colin Allred (D-TX), Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL). He also donated to the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
Free Speech for People.
Based in Amherst, Massachusetts, Free Speech for People is a leftist law-fare group founded by John Bonifaz — a long time voting rights activist and political progressive. According to their IRS 990 filings, Free Speech for People had a total revenue of just over $1.5 million in 2021. In 2020, the group’s revenue was double at just over $3 million. According to the left-wing legal advocacy group’s annual reports, its 2021 budget was raised through funds from the Arkay Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, CREDO, The Fred Gellert Family Foundation, the Gaia Fund, The Kohlberg Foundation, the Lisa and Douglas Goldman Fund, the Park Foundation, Ralph E. Ogden Foundation, the Threshold Foundation, and the WhyNot Initiative.
show less
A small group of Illinois voters, backed by the the leftist law-fare nonprofit 'Free Speech for People', has filed a petition with the state board of elections asking that former President Donald Trump be removed from the Republican primary ballot. The petition claims the former Republican president is barred from office under the 'insurrection' clause found in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
show more
The Supreme Court has agreed to take up President Trump’s appeal of his removal from the Colorado and Maine ballots, granting his petition for a writ of certiorari on Friday. Oral arguments are set for Thursday, February 8.
🚨BREAKING: The Supreme Court will take up the case of President Trump being removed from the ballot in Colorado and Maine.
The Supreme Court has agreed to take up President Trump's appeal of his removal from the Colorado and Maine ballots, granting his petition for a writ of certiorari on Friday. Oral arguments are set for Thursday, February 8.
show more
Writing in his Daily Mailcolumn on Friday, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson blasted the Maine and Colorado decisions to try to keep former President Donald J. Trump off the ballot for the 2024 presidential elections.
Johnson, who has routinely been unkind about Trump, wrote of how the authoritarian attempts to keep Trump off the ballot make it impossible for Western nations to claim the moral high ground against dictatorships when their ruling elite classes act in the very same way:
Can we really say that it is the sovereign people, and the people alone, who get to decide who makes the law? I don’t think we can say that of the United States, today, where another court has just decided that Donald Trump’s name should not appear on the ballot paper for next year’s Presidential election. The judges of Maine have joined the judges of Colorado in effectively banning former President Trump from presenting himself as a candidate. I am amazed that this is not causing more general consternation.
Making clear he thinks Trump lost in 2020 while calling January 6th “dismaying”, the former Mayor of London also insisted that [Trump] did not prevent the peaceful transfer of power, and “has not been convicted of an insurrection, or an attempted insurrection.”
Refering to the former President as “an innocent man,” Johnson explains: “…think how this looks in the eyes of the rest of the world — all the places where they are fed up with being lectured about the joys of Western liberal democracy. Across the world there are dictatorial and sometimes brutal leaders who use a corrupt judicial system to disbar their opponents from seeking elective office.
“That is to say, they fabricate some charge against them at least to tie them up in legal knots — and, if necessary, actually send them to prison.
“It’s what they do in Venezuela — President Nicolas Maduro did it to his opponent. It’s what Putin did to the oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky. It’s what the Tatmadaw in Burma have done to Aung San Suu Kyi. It’s what they used to do in Ukraine — the Kremlin lackey Yanukovich locked up his opponent Yulia Timoshenko.
“Why do they lock them up? Because they are frightened of their potential popularity; because they will do anything they can to stop them appearing before the electorate.”
Johnson concludes: “It is four years since the deplorable events of January 6, 2020. The American public have had lots of time to decide what they think of Trump’s handling of the matter. They, and they alone, should decide whether he is fit for another term.”
show less
Writing in his Daily Mailcolumn on Friday, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson blasted the Maine and Colorado decisions to try to keep former President Donald J. Trump off the ballot for the 2024 presidential elections.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
Maine’s Democratic Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, made the unprecedented decision on Thursday to exclude former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot, ostensibly under the Constitution’s insurrection clause. This move, which was prompted by the Jan 6th insurrection hoax, could have significant ramifications for the Electoral College. Maine’s unique system of splitting its four electoral votes means the absence of Trump if he is the Republican candidate could be consequential in an expected closely-contested race.
The decision by Bellows follows a comparable action made by the Colorado Supreme Court in December, which similarly disqualified Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This ruling was reached following a challenge by a group of far-left Maine residents. Despite pushback from Trump’s lawyers who requested her recusal citing exhibited bias, Bellows stood by the ruling stating the Capitol attack was an insurrection, despite no court ruling supporting such a claim.
The final say on Trump’s political future does not lie solely with Bellows, however. Her decision is subject to legal appeal and expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court for final determination early next year. Meanwhile, the ruling has also incentivized self-described communists nationwide to call for Trump’s removal from their ballots under the same clause. While previously rejected, this constituted Maine law’s first-ever exclusion of a presidential candidate from its ballot. The Trump campaign has stated its intention to appeal the ruling. A decision which, if reached by the Supreme Court, will affect all states including Maine.
show less
Maine's Democratic Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, made the unprecedented decision on Thursday to exclude former President Donald Trump from the state's presidential primary ballot, ostensibly under the Constitution's insurrection clause. This move, which was prompted by the Jan 6th insurrection hoax, could have significant ramifications for the Electoral College. Maine's unique system of splitting its four electoral votes means the absence of Trump if he is the Republican candidate could be consequential in an expected closely-contested race.
show more
A Louisiana woman has filed a state lawsuit with the goal of kicking Donald Trump off the state’s March 23rd Republican presidential ballot. Presented simply as a Louisiana citizen by establishment news outlets, Ashley Reeb is, in fact, a self-described “neocommunist” and member of St. Bernard Parish Democrat Executive Committee.
Reeb’s lawsuit, filed on December 22nd, claims: “Both Trump’s actions (engaging in insurrection) as well as his inaction (giving aid and comfort to insurrectionists) on Jan. 6, 2021, disqualify him from holding any office of/under the United States.” Ms. Reeb’s legal claims echo those dismissed by state supreme courts in Minnesota and Michigan.
According to her LinkedIn profile, Ms. Reeb works as seasonal staff with the The New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival and Foundation, Inc. From 1999 to 2005 she served as a part-time Administrative File Clerk with the Louisiana National Guard, and as a Deputy with the St. Bernard Parish Sheriff’s Office from 2001 to 2003.
An examination of Ms. Reeb’s social media account on X (formerly Twitter) reveals she is a follower and reposter of a whose-who of ‘ResistanceLib’ accounts. Reeb herself has pushed the debunked Russiagate conspiracy theory as recently as August 21st, 2023. In addition, she has posted pro-Hamas propaganda on her Facebook page, claiming Israeli hostages were well treated by their Hamas terrorist captors and even ‘thanked’ them – with additional claims it is Israelis who have engaged in mass kidnappings of Palestinians. According to local reports, Ms. Reeb flies both a transgender flag and a Black Lives Matter flag outside her home.
"They KNOW he is a fucking prolific criminal, and they are mostly too chickenshit to call him out for it."
Simple answer: Russian kompromat. The RNC was hacked when the DNC was. Interestingly, that's about the time when they all fell in line 🤔 https://t.co/JzuktoEQag
A Louisiana woman has filed a state lawsuit with the goal of kicking Donald Trump off the state's March 23rd Republican presidential ballot. Presented simply as a Louisiana citizen by establishment news outlets, Ashley Reeb is, in fact, a self-described "neocommunist" and member of St. Bernard Parish Democrat Executive Committee.
show more
Michigan’s Supreme Court has ruled against petitioners seeking to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot. “Free Speech For People”, a group who ostensibly filed the lawsuit on behalf of a group of Michigan voters, argued Section 3 of the 14th Amendment bars Trump for holding elected office – alleging Trump had lead an insurrection against the United States on January 6th, 2021.
Free Speech For People is a far-left group funded by George Soros’s fund, the Rockefeller Family Fund, the climate alarmism lobby, and the Hamas-linked Tides Foundation.
With dueling rulings from the Michigan and Colorado State Supreme Courts, the urgency for the United States Supreme Court to settle the matter has only increased. It is expected the legal team for former President Trump will appeal the Colorado ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court this week.
Unlike Colorado, Michigan does not have a provision in their stateelection law requiring a presidential candidate to present their qualifications for holding office. Michigan Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth Welch wrote the petitioners “…have identified no analogous provision in the Michigan Election Law that requires someone seeking the office of President of the United States to attest to their legal qualification to hold the office.”
Prior to the state’s Supreme Court order, the Michigan Court of Claims and Michigan Court of Appeals held: “At the moment, the only event about to occur is the presidential primary election. But as explained, whether Trump is disqualified is irrelevant to his placement on that particular ballot.”
JUST IN: The Michigan Supreme Court has rejected consideration of an effort to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 primary ballot, affirming a lower court's ruling that permits a renewed challenge during the general election.
Michigan's Supreme Court has ruled against petitioners seeking to remove former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 primary ballot. "Free Speech For People", a group who ostensibly filed the lawsuit on behalf of a group of Michigan voters, argued Section 3 of the 14th Amendment bars Trump for holding elected office – alleging Trump had lead an insurrection against the United States on January 6th, 2021.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
Yesterday, four of Colorado’s seven state Supreme Court justices ruled to remove former President Donald Trump from the Rocky Mountain state’s 2024 ballot. Justices Monica Márquez, William W. Hood III, Richard L. Gabriel, and Melissa Hart all held the former President had instigated an insurrection against the United States and was therefore constitutionally disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The three other justices, including Chief Justice Brian Boatright, all dissented from the radical opinion.
In late 2020, the Colorado judicial system was rocked by accusations of sexual harassment against female court employees. State law, however, shields judges from public discipline – with detailed accusations rarely becoming public unless they are part of a public court hearing. We do know between 2010 and 2019, Colorado judges were disciplined 51 times for offenses ranging from failing to issue timely rulings to engaging in sexual relations with court employees. The Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline hears, on average, 200 complains against judicial officials a year, with 90-percent being dismissed.
Justice Monica Márquez: The LGBT Latina.
Judge Monica Márquez – as well as her three colleagues who joined her in kicking Trump off the Colorado ballot – is a graduate of an elite American law school. She attained her undergraduate degree from Stanford University and her Juris Doctorate (JD) from Yale University’s law school.
Márquez’s appointment to the Colorado Supreme Court made her both the first woman of Hispanic-heritage and first gay person to serve on the state’s high court. A dyed-in-the-wool progressive, she was appointed by Democrat Governor Bill Ritter, Jr in 2010 – after spending much of her early career engaged in gay-and-lesbian issues in the state.
Prior to her appointment, Márquez served as president of the Colorado LGBT Bar Association and on the Denver mayor’s LGBT Commission. While she has been less politically active as a member of the state’s judiciary, in 2008 Márquez did make several small contributions to then-Illinois Senator Barack Obama’s ultimately victorious campaign for President of the United States.
Justice William W. Hood III: The Obama Connection.
Unlike his colleague, Justice Márquez, judge William W. Hood III wasn’t an active political donor prior to joining the bench in early 2014. Appointed by then-Governor John Hickenlooper – who now serves as the junior Democrat Senator for Colorado – Hood received his JD from the University of Virginia School of Law. When the Colorado Supreme Court accepted the resignation of Arapahoe County judge Natalie Chase, and censured her for exhibiting racial bias, Justice Hood noted the censure did not mean all of the judge’s rulings were invalid. “Only when a judge was actually biased will we question the reliability of the proceeding’s result,” Hood said at the time, upholding a prior Judge Chase ruling in a parental rights case.
Prior to becoming a judge, Hood worked at Isaacson Rosenbaum, a legal firm which served as counsel to the Democratic National Committee during the August 2008 convention at which Barack Obama was nominated as presidential candidate.
Justice Richard L. Gabriel: Accused of Sexual Harassment.
From Brooklyn New York, Gabriel is another Ivy League graduate, receiving his JD from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Gabriel is described as “instrumental in representing” music industry corporates against digital file sharers in the early 2000s. After his 2015 appointment to the state supreme court by then-Gov. Hickenlooper, Justice Gabriel was accused of work-place sexual harassment. Between 2000 and 2007, Gabriel was a frequent donor to the Colorado Democrat Party, as well as Democrat candidates for office. After his appointment to the Colorado Court of Appeals by Democrat Gov. Bill Ritter in 2008, Gabriel’s political activity ceased.
Justice Melissa Hart: The Watergate Connection.
The final of the four justices to rule against Trump is Melissa Hart, the granddaughter of Democrat attorney and Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox. Hart clerked for Clinton appointee Guido Calabresi, and both her and Gabriel were named in a 2018 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint filed by Michele Brown – a black woman who was over the age of 60 at the time. Brown alleged she was passed over for employment with the court by a six-person hiring committee – including both Gabriel and Hart – in favor of a younger, less experienced white woman. The case brought by Brown was ultimately dismissed.
Like her colleagues, Hart is also a graduate of an elite law school, receiving her JD from Harvard University. She was appointed to the high court in 2017 by then-Gov. Hickenlooper. Prior to her appointment, Hart had made several contributions to Democrat candidates over the years, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns.
The Dissenting Justices.
All three of the Colorado Supreme Court dissenters, Chief Justice Brian Boatright, Justice Maria E. Berkenkotter, and Justice Carlos Samour are graduates of the University of Denver School of Law. The divide between the justices when viewed through their education background suggests the four who ruled to remove Trump from the ballot were perhaps influenced by a more activist judicial tradition found in America’s elite, Ivy League institutions.
When asked on Wednesday if he believed former President Trump was an ‘insurrectionist’ and if he agreed with the Colorado decision, President Joe Biden said it is self-evident, adding “You saw it all. He continued: “Now whether the 14th Amendment applies, I’ll let the court make that decision. But he certainly supported an insurrection. There’s no question about it. None. Zero.”
The United States Supreme Court is likely to make a swift ruling in the Colorado ballot case – the state’s primary ballots are set to be certified on January 5th, 2024. If the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision does indeed go into effect, the Colorado Republican Party has said it will abandon the state-run primary and opt for a Party run caucus to select the GOP presidential nominee instead.
Raheem J. Kassam contributed to this report.
show less
Yesterday, four of Colorado's seven state Supreme Court justices ruled to remove former President Donald Trump from the Rocky Mountain state's 2024 ballot. Justices Monica Márquez, William W. Hood III, Richard L. Gabriel, and Melissa Hart all held the former President had instigated an insurrection against the United States and was therefore constitutionally disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The three other justices, including Chief Justice Brian Boatright, all dissented from the radical opinion.
show more
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said he will not remove his name form the Colorado ballot if the Colorado Supreme Court‘s order to remove former President Trump’s name is upheld. DeSantis’s fellow Republican presidential primary candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, challenged DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to join him removing his name should Trump’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court fail.
Ramaswamy stated, “I pledge to withdraw from the Colorado GOP primary ballot until Trump is also allowed to be on the ballot,” before adding, “I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley do the same immediately.”
RON’S RESPONSE.
“No, I think that’s just playing in to the left,” DeSantis said in an interview on Newsmax earlier today. “I think the case will get overturned by the [U.S.] Supreme Court.” He continued: “I’ve qualified for all of the ballots, I’m competing in all of the states. And I’m going to accumulate the delegates necessary.” At no point did the Florida Governor actually condemn the judicial overreach and anti-democratic ruling by the Colorado justices.
Late last night in a post on X (formerly Twitter), DeSantis’s campaign account was slightly more forceful, stating: “The Left invokes ‘democracy’ to justify its use of power, even if it means abusing judicial power to remove a candidate from the ballot based on spurious legal grounds. SCOTUS should reverse.” Again, however, the Governor fell short of the vocal condemnations made by other Republican officials.
CHRISTIE’S COMMENTS.
Chris Christie, one of Trump’s harshest critics in the Republican primary, emphatically stated, “I do not believe Donald Trump should be prevented from being President of the United States by any court.” He continued: “I don’t believe it is good for our country if he’s precluded from the ballot by a court.” Regarding the insurrection charge, Christie was blunt, stating there has been no trial convicting Trump of insurrection.
BIRDBRAIN’S BLUSTER.
Speaking to reporters in Iowa, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley gave an equally feckless answer as DeSantis. “I will tell you that I don’t think Donald Trump needs to be president. I think I need to be president. I think that’s good for the country,” responded Haley. She added, “But I will beat him fair and square. We don’t need to have judges making these decisions, we need voters to make these decisions.”
show less
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said he will not remove his name form the Colorado ballot if the Colorado Supreme Court's order to remove former President Trump's name is upheld. DeSantis's fellow Republican presidential primary candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, challenged DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to join him removing his name should Trump's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court fail.
show more
California Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis has urged Secretary of State Shirley Weber to “explore every legal option” to prevent Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot. Citing the recent Colorado Supreme Court decision, which notionally disqualified Trump from the state’s ballot due to false claims of inciting an insurrection, Kounalakis made her plea in a letter sent Wednesday. The Colorado court decision was erroneously based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
In her letter, the far left Kounalakis risibly claimed that her request is not about removing a political candidate but upholding democratic principles and laws. “The decision is about honoring the rule of law in our country and protecting the fundamental pillars of democracy. California must stand on the right side of history,” Kounalakis wrote. She further pointed out that the constitution mandates presidential candidates to be a minimum of forty years old and devoid of insurrectionist activities.
In reality, the Constitution states a commander in chief must be 35 years old, and the 14th amendment’s prohibitions apply to “officers” who have fomented insurrection. The former President is not and has never been an “officer”, as almost all legal scholars accept.
The former president has been facing multiple legal challenges, including 91 federal and state criminal and civil charges across four states, potentially resulting in up to 700 years of imprisonment. These have been led by Democrat operative Jack Smith and the New York and Georgia Attorneys General. Despite these legal troubles, Trump continues to lead in the polls against Joe Biden in key battleground states for a hypothetical general election.
California Lt. Gov. @EleniForCA writes to Secretary of State Shirley Weber to “explore every legal option to remove former President Donald Trump from California’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.”
California Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis has urged Secretary of State Shirley Weber to "explore every legal option" to prevent Donald Trump from appearing on the state's 2024 presidential primary ballot. Citing the recent Colorado Supreme Court decision, which notionally disqualified Trump from the state’s ballot due to false claims of inciting an insurrection, Kounalakis made her plea in a letter sent Wednesday. The Colorado court decision was erroneously based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
show more
Colorado’s Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling on Tuesday, asserting that former President Donald Trump cannot be included on the state’s 2024 electionelection ballot. The decision, grounded in the claim Trump incited the January 6 Capitol riot, reverses a previous court decision but will stay in effect till January 4th with the anticipation it will be “subject to further appellate proceedings”.
The ruling comes on the back of a Soros-backed organization’s work to kick Trump off the ballot (more in the Editor’s Notes, below).
The Trump campaign issued the following statement late Tuesday: “Unsurprisingly, the all-Democrat appointed Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, supporting a Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme to interfere in an election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden by removing President Trump’s name from the ballot and eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.
“Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November. The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision. We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.”
The legal argument revolves around a provision in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs, a group of six Colorado voters backed by the Soros “CREW” group, contended that Trump’s actions during the Capitol riot constituted an “insurrection” and thus violated Section 3, which specifically disqualifies anyone engaged in rebellion against the United States from serving in federal office.
The lawsuit faced initial turbulence in November when Denver District Court Judge Sarah Wallace ruled that despite her belief that Trump had incited the riot, he could still appear on the ballot as the office of the president was not subject to Section 3. However, the decision was later appealed by both the plaintiffs and Trump himself, who contested the claim of his involvement in insurrection. The dispute reached the Colorado Supreme Court, which heard arguments on December 6. This event is now at the forefront of several ongoing litigations in multiple states challenging Trump’s eligibility to participate in the presidential ballot.
show less
Colorado's Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling on Tuesday, asserting that former President Donald Trump cannot be included on the state's 2024 election election ballot. The decision, grounded in the claim Trump incited the January 6 Capitol riot, reverses a previous court decision but will stay in effect till January 4th with the anticipation it will be "subject to further appellate proceedings".
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
Recall the background to all this: Two non-profits which have received funding from George Soros’s behemoth Open Society Foundations are using laws originally intended to exclude Confederate rebels from federal office
Recall the background to all this: Two non-profits which have received funding from George Soros’s behemoth Open Society Foundations are using laws originally intended to exclude Confederate rebels from federal office show more
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.