Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Trump Admin Defeats British Demands for Access to Apple Customers’ Encrypted Data.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The British government has dropped its demand for Apple to provide “backdoor” access to encrypted customer data, according to U.S. Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The British government, Apple, President Donald J. Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, and U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The dispute has unfolded over the past several months across the United States and the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Over the past few months, I’ve been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside President Trump and Vice-President Vance, to ensure Americans’ private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected.” – Tulsi Gabbard

🎯IMPACT: The decision should prevent unauthorized access to encrypted data, but questions remain about British customers’ data protection options.

IN FULL

The British government has reportedly abandoned its demands for Apple to provide law enforcement with “backdoor” access to encrypted data belonging to users in the United States. U.S. Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard shared the update on X (formerly Twitter), signaling a potential end to the prolonged standoff involving Apple, British authorities, and the U.S. government.

The dispute began when the British Home Office issued a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act, demanding Apple’s cooperation in decrypting user data. Apple challenged the order in court, prompting a legal battle. Although the Home Office attempted to keep the case out of the public eye, judges later ruled that the proceedings must be made public.

“Over the past few months, I’ve been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside President Trump and Vice-President Vance, to ensure Americans’ private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,” Gabbard said.

President Donald J. Trump condemned the UK’s approach, likening it to surveillance tactics used by China. Vice-President JD Vance also voiced disapproval, saying, “I don’t want American citizens to be spied on,” and dismissed the notion of a backdoor as “crazy.”

In February, in response to the UK’s demands, Apple scaled back its advanced data protection features for new customers in the country. The company cited its firm stance on not weakening encryption, which meant UK users were excluded from end-to-end encryption features for iCloud Drive, photos, and notes, potentially exposing their data to greater risk. Civil liberties advocates warned that creating backdoor access could disproportionately impact vulnerable groups, including activists, politicians, and minorities.

While Gabbard has stated that the UK has now abandoned the request, the Home Office has neither confirmed nor denied the claim. “We do not comment on operational matters,” a spokesman said. The department reiterated its dedication to working with the U.S. on security threats, while upholding privacy and national sovereignty. Apple has not yet said whether UK users will regain access to its full suite of encrypted services.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Google Caught Routing GOP Fundraiser Emails to Spam.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Republican consulting firm has raised concerns about Google’s Gmail disproportionately flagging Republican fundraising emails as spam while allowing Democratic emails to bypass filters.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Targeted Victory, Google, and political entities such as the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA), and Senator Marsha Blackburn (TN).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The filtering concerns were observed in June and July 2025, with tests conducted on Gmail’s platform.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If Gmail is allowed to quietly suppress WinRed links while giving ActBlue a free pass, it will continue to tilt the playing field in ways that voters never see, but campaigns will feel every single day.” – Targeted Victory memo.

🎯IMPACT: The accusations raise further questions about tech companies’ influence over elections and voter outreach.

IN FULL

A Republican consulting firm, Targeted Victory, has accused Google of unfairly filtering Republican fundraising emails into Gmail spam folders while allowing similar Democratic emails to reach users’ inboxes. The claims, outlined in a memo, highlight ongoing concerns about potential political bias in tech platforms.

The memo revealed that emails containing links to the Republican platform WinRed were frequently flagged as spam, while identical emails with links to the Democratic platform ActBlue were delivered without issue. “The only difference between the two emails was the link,” the memo stated, adding that this pattern persisted even for high-profile accounts such as those of President Donald J. Trump and Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY). Targeted Victory warned: “If Gmail is allowed to quietly suppress WinRed links while giving ActBlue a free pass, it will continue to tilt the playing field in ways that voters never see, but campaigns will feel every single day.”

Google has denied the allegations, with company spokesman José Castañeda stating, “Email filter protections are in place to keep our users safe. They look at a variety of signals—like whether a user has previously marked an email as spam—and apply equally to all senders, regardless of political ideology.”

Research has previously identified disparities in email filtering practices. A 2022 study by North Carolina State University found Gmail flagged 59 percent more Republican fundraising emails as spam compared to Democratic ones during the 2020 election cycle. The study’s authors noted that spam filtering algorithms exhibited biases based on political affiliations.

Targeted Victory reported contacting Google on June 30 to address the issue, but alleged that Google initially deflected responsibility, attributing the filtering behavior to “local settings.” By July, Google acknowledged that WinRed links were flagged as “suspicious,” according to screenshots provided by the firm. The memo warned, “This should alarm every campaign and committee that relies on email to connect with voters.”

Image by Anthony Quintano.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Demands Intel CEO Linked to China Resign, ‘There Is No Other Solution.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump called for the resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, citing conflicts of interest due to Tan’s ties to Chinese firms.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Intel’s board of directors.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s statement was made on Thursday via Truth Social, following a letter from Senator Cotton to Intel’s board.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Intel shares fell by approximately 4 percent in U.S. premarket trading, and the company faces scrutiny over Tan’s investments in Chinese firms.

IN FULL

On Thursday, U.S. President Donald J. Trump demanded the resignation of Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan, citing “highly conflicted” ties to Chinese firms. The demand follows a report that revealed Tan’s investments in hundreds of Chinese companies, some linked to the Chinese military.

Trump’s statement came after U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) sent a letter to Intel’s board chair raising concerns over Tan’s connections to China and a criminal case involving his previous company, Cadence Design. “The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!” President Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, leading Intel shares to drop by approximately 4 percent in premarket trading.

Intel, a major player in U.S. chip manufacturing, received nearly $20 billion in federal grants under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act to bolster domestic semiconductor production. The company stated that both Intel and Tan “are deeply committed to the national security of the U.S. and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem.” Intel also noted it would address the concerns raised by Senator Cotton.

Tan assumed the role of CEO in March, succeeding Pat Gelsinger. Under his leadership, Intel has aimed to cut costs by reducing its workforce by 22 percent and halting construction on several planned manufacturing sites. Despite these efforts, Intel has struggled to regain its position in the semiconductor industry, losing ground to Taiwan’s TSMC and falling behind in the artificial intelligence chip market dominated by Nvidia.

It was revealed earlier this year that Tan, through various venture funds, has invested at least $200 million in advanced manufacturing and chip firms in China. While sources close to the Intel CEO claim Tan has divested from these positions, Chinese databases appear to show many of the investments remain current. The extent of any divestitures remains unclear.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

WATCH: Vance Blasts Big Tech for Replacing American Workers With Migrants.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Vice President J.D. Vance publicly criticized Microsoft and other Big Tech companies for laying off thousands of American workers while continuing to apply for H-1B visas to hire foreigners.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Vice President Vance, American tech companies, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: United States, July 24, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. We want them to build great companies and so forth. But I don’t want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, ‘We can’t find workers here in America.’ That’s a bulls**t story.” — J.D. Vance

🎯IMPACT: Vance’s comments amplify criticism of Big Tech for prioritizing foreign hires while laying off U.S. workers.

IN FULL

Vice President J.D. Vance criticized Big Tech companies for taking advantage of the H1-B visa program by firing American workers and hiring a multitude of H1-B visa holders from other countries. “You see some big tech companies where they’ll lay off 9,000 workers, and then they’ll apply for a bunch of overseas visas. And I sort of wonder; that doesn’t totally make sense to me,” Vance said at the Hill and Valley Forum.

“That displacement and that math worries me a bit. And what the President has said, he said very clearly: We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. We want them to build great companies and so forth. But I don’t want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, ‘We can’t find workers here in America.’ That’s a bullsh*t story,” Vance added.

Microsoft said earlier in July that it would be laying off 9,000 workers. One of the hosts at the Hill and Valley Forum asked Vance directly, “What did Microsoft say when you brought that up with Microsoft?” Vance laughed and admitted that it was Microsoft that he had been referring to, noting that despite laying off 9,000 workers, the company is “saying they’re desperate for workers.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump DOJ Targets Media-Tech Alliance in Antitrust Lawsuit.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has entered a legal battle involving allegations that major media outlets and tech corporations coordinated to suppress independent journalism through the Trusted News Initiative (TNI).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Plaintiffs include Children’s Health Defense (CHD), independent publishers, and reporters. Defendants include TNI participants such as the BBC, Reuters, The Associated Press (AP), The Washington Post, and tech firms like Google, Meta, and Microsoft.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in 2023, with the DOJ filing its notice of intent last week in federal court.

💬KEY QUOTE: The DOJ highlighted the CHD lawsuit’s focus on “anticompetitive collusion among competitors over product features” as of particular interest.

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ’s involvement could signal a shift in addressing anticompetitive practices and bolster the plaintiffs’ case against TNI.

IN FULL

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is entering a legal battle challenging an alliance between establishment media outlets and technology corporations accused of stifling independent journalism. According to the lead plaintiff, the Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the Trusted News Initiative (TNI)—a BBC-led international consortium that includes the likes of Reuters, The Associated Press (AP), and The Washington Post—unlawfully coordinated with technology companies to throttle independent media competitors by labeling their reporting as “misinformation” or “disinformation.”

In federal filings, the plaintiffs argue that the collusion between TNI and the technology industry constitutes a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, contending the scheme is an anti-competitive practice. While the lawsuit was initially filed in 2023, it languished in federal court until last week, when the DOJ indicated it would soon submit a statement of interest in the case. Notably, a statement of interest is a filing where the DOJ informs a court of its stance on a particular legal issue or argument. Specifically, the DOJ highlighted the CHD lawsuit’s focus on “anticompetitive collusion among competitors over product features” as of particular interest.

Mary Holland, the CEO of CHD, welcomed the Trump administration’s involvement in the case, which could help advance the lawsuit. Plaintiffs argue that the collusion between TNI and social media companies resulted in shadow bans and targeted content removals under the guise of fighting “disinformation.” The plaintiffs state these measures were aimed at restricting their media reach and ability to conduct business.

Founded by the BBC’s former Chief of Staff, Jessica Cecil, TNI publicly presents itself as an international coalition of media outlets, technology corporations, and social media companies working to counter “disinformation.” However, CHD and its co-plaintiffs contend that the organization’s true purpose is to protect the corporate media’s market monopoly, using anti-competitive practices to stifle independent news companies.

In court filings, they cite comments by figures close to TNI’s operations, like former BBC news controller Jamie Angus, who stated that independent media competitors had unleashed “a tidal wave of unchecked [reporting] that’s being piped out mainly through digital platforms.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Says China Can Keep Harvesting Your Data For Now.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order extending the deadline for China’s ByteDance to sell TikTok to a U.S.-based buyer by another 90 days.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, ByteDance, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The executive order was signed on Thursday, with the new deadline set for September 17, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’ve just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025). Thank you for your attention to this matter!” – Donald Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The extension allows TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. while ByteDance seeks an American buyer.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has extended the deadline for TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to sell the short-form video app to an American owner by another 90 days. On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order granting this extension, allowing the Chinese company more time to sell its platform and continue operating in the United States.

“I’ve just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025). Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump announced on Truth Social. While aboard Air Force One on Wednesday morning, Trump expressed optimism that Chinese President Xi Jinping would be open to a deal involving the sale of TikTok. ByteDance, based in Beijing, has not yet commented on the matter.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated, “As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark. This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.”

A law was initially passed under the Biden government banning TikTok unless ByteDance, which is tied to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), divests, citing national security concerns. Since Trump’s administration signaled it would allow the app to remain operational in the U.S., TikTok resumed functioning after briefly going offline. ByteDance has denied that TikTok poses security concerns and claims American data is not stored in China. However, it was fined hundreds of millions of dollars in Europe just last month, after regulators found that, despite denials, user data was indeed being held on Chinese servers. Last year, The National Pulse reported that a supposed “firewall” preventing U.S. data from being shared with China was proving ineffective.

The Supreme Court has upheld the Biden-era law requiring TikTok to be sold to an American owner. Under the new deadline set by Trump, ByteDance must finalize a sale to a U.S.-based buyer. Potential buyers have included Amazon, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, and others.

However, ByteDance has remained quiet on whether it will make a deal, with no real evidence that one was imminent prior to this extension or a previous extension.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

OpenAI Scientist Wants to Build Bunker Before Releasing Artificial General Intelligence.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Former OpenAI Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever reportedly discussed building a bunker in preparation for the release of artificial general intelligence (AGI).

👥 Who’s Involved: Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI leadership, CEO Sam Altman, and researchers within the company.

📍 Where & When: OpenAI, summer 2023, leading up to the November 2023 attempted ouster of Altman.

💬 Key Quote: “We’re definitely going to build a bunker before we release AGI,” Sutskever said during a meeting.

⚠️ Impact: Sutskever’s fixation on AGI and related concerns contributed to internal strife at OpenAI, culminating in his role in an unsuccessful coup against Altman, dubbed “The Blip.”

IN FULL:

OpenAI’s former Chief Scientist, Ilya Sutskever, reportedly suggested constructing a bunker to prepare for the potential risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI), according to new details shared by insiders familiar with the 2023 tumult at the top of the artificial intelligence (AI) company. The revelations, which emerged in interviews conducted by journalist Karen Hao, highlight Sutskever’s intense preoccupation with AGI and its implications.

During a summer 2023 meeting, Sutskever reportedly stated, “We’re definitely going to build a bunker before we release AGI.” Two other individuals who attended the meeting corroborated the account, with one describing Sutskever’s AGI beliefs as akin to anticipating a “rapture.”

AGI refers to a form of AI capable of grasping any intellectual tasks a human being can and carrying them out, possibly more effectively. Sutskever, who co-founded OpenAI, has long been vocal about his views on AGI, even claiming in 2022 that some AI models might be “slightly conscious.” His concerns about AGI’s development reportedly deepened by mid-2023, alongside growing dissatisfaction with OpenAI’s handling of the technology.

This unease played a role in Sutskever’s decision to join other board members in a failed attempt to oust CEO Sam Altman in November 2023. However, sources indicated that Sutskever’s resolve wavered as OpenAI employees rallied behind Altman. He later retracted his opposition to Altman’s leadership, though this effort to salvage his position ultimately proved unsuccessful.

The internal turmoil, referred to by OpenAI insiders as “The Blip,” underscores the divisions within the company over its direction and the risks of AGI. Despite Sutskever’s departure, the debate over AGI’s future and its potential consequences continues to loom large over OpenAI and the broader tech industry.

Recently, OpenAI announced it was partnering with a start-up founded by Jony Ive, famous for his work on Apple hardware, especially the design of the iPhone. While neither Ive nor Altman has revealed what sort of hardware product the partnership will produce, it is speculated that it will focus on “physical AI embodiments,” essentially moving the AI technology to other forms besides computers.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

REPORT: Microsoft Blocks ‘Palestine’ in Internal Emails.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Microsoft temporarily blocked emails containing terms like “Palestine,” “Gaza,” and “Genocide” from being sent by employees.

👥 Who’s Involved: Microsoft employees, the No Azure for Apartheid (NOAA) protest group, and Microsoft leadership.

📍 Where & When: Inside Microsoft’s email systems; protests occurred during the Microsoft Build developer conference this week.

💬 Key Quote: “NOAA believes this is an attempt by Microsoft to silence worker free speech and is a censorship enacted by Microsoft leadership to discriminate against Palestinian workers and their allies,” said NOAA organizer Hossam Nasr.

⚠️ Impact: Employee protests disrupted major company events, and Microsoft confirmed email restrictions to reduce politically charged internal messages.

IN FULL:

Microsoft employees have reported that internal emails containing terms such as “Palestine,” “Gaza,” and “Genocide” are being temporarily blocked from delivery, both internally and externally. The No Azure for Apartheid (NOAA) protest group claims that “dozens” of workers have experienced these restrictions, alleging that the company is targeting language critical of Israel.

Hossam Nasr, a NOAA organizer, accused Microsoft of attempting to stifle free speech and discriminating against Palestinian employees and their allies. “NOAA believes this is an attempt by Microsoft to silence worker free speech and is a censorship enacted by Microsoft leadership,” Nasr said.

Microsoft has confirmed that changes have been made to its email system to limit politically oriented communications. “Emailing large numbers of employees about any topic not related to work is not appropriate,” said spokesman Frank Shaw. “Over the past couple of days, a number of politically focused emails have been sent to tens of thousands of employees across the company, and we have taken measures to try and reduce those emails to those that have not opted in.”

The restrictions coincided with protests during Microsoft’s Build developer conference, where employees and former workers voiced opposition to the company’s contracts with the Israeli government. On Monday, an employee named Joe Lopez interrupted CEO Satya Nadella’s keynote, accusing Microsoft of enabling “Israeli war crimes” through its Azure cloud services. Lopez was later terminated after sending an email to thousands of employees.

Further disruptions occurred on subsequent days, including a protest by a Palestinian tech worker and an incident where two former employees interrupted a session.

Microsoft recently defended its contracts with Israel, stating that internal and external reviews found no evidence of its tools being used to harm civilians in Gaza.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Regulators Accuse TikTok of Secretly Sending User Data to China.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: TikTok faces a $599 million fine for illegal data transfers to China.

👥 Who’s Involved: TikTok, Irish Data Protection Commission, President Donald J. Trump.

📍 Where & When: Ireland; alleged violations occurred between 2020 and 2022.

💬 Key Quote: “TikTok failed to verify, guarantee and demonstrate that the personal data of [European] users… was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,” said Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle.

⚠️ Impact: TikTok must align its data practices with EU standards within six months or halt data transfers to China. Plans for an appeal have been stated.

IN FULL:

Irish regulators have imposed a substantial fine on TikTok, the Beijing-owned video platform, requiring the company to pay $599 million. This penalty arises after it was discovered that TikTok unlawfully sent user data from Europe to China, breaching data protection laws of the European Union (EU), according to the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC).

Following a four-year investigation, the DPC concluded that TikTok had not implemented adequate safeguards when transferring European users’ data to China. Additionally, between 2020 and 2022, the platform did not disclose to its users that their data could be accessed by personnel in China.

“TikTok failed to verify, guarantee and demonstrate that the personal data of [European] users, remotely accessed by staff in China, was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,” DPC deputy commissioner Graham Doyle said.

This fine coincides with enduring scrutiny of TikTok’s connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). U.S. officials have raised national security concerns over TikTok and mandated that the app sever ties with its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, by June 19, or it risks an outright ban in the U.S.

Despite TikTok’s persistent denials regarding the storage of European or American data on Chinese servers, the company admitted in April to having stored limited data from European users in China. The revelations prompted serious concerns from Irish regulators about further regulatory actions that might be necessary.

The fine constitutes the third-largest fine under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulators have instructed TikTok to bring its data handling practices into compliance with EU standards within six months, or it will be required to suspend all data transfers to China.

In response, TikTok has stated its strong disagreement with the Irish commission’s findings and its intentions to appeal the decision.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump DOJ Urges Court to Order Google to Sell Chrome in Antitrust Push.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Justice Department has called on a federal judge to require Google to surrender control over its Chrome web browser due to antitrust concerns.

👥 Who’s Involved: Key figures include Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater, Justice Department official David Dahlquist, and U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta.

📍 Where & When: The remarks were made in court on Monday; the proceedings occurred in the United States.

💬 Key Quote: “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.” — Deputy Attorney General Blanche.

⚠️ Impact: Potentially significant changes in control of Google’s Chrome web browser and broader implications for competition within the global search market.

IN FULL:

In a significant development in antitrust proceedings against Google, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) urged a district judge on Monday to compel Google to divest ownership of the Chrome web browser. The call comes as part of ongoing efforts to address Google’s dominant role in the global search market. Some allege the dominance is maintained through illegal agreements that hinder competition and negatively affect consumers and advertisers.

In court, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche cited Google’s monopolistic practices, emphasizing the company’s extensive influence over online data and alleged political bias through its search engine operations. Deputy Attorney General Blanche told U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.”

He argued that Google’s control stems largely from its nearly $20 billion annual payment to Apple, securing Google’s search engine as the default on Apple’s Safari browser. This payment was highlighted during a trial last year focusing on liability.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has previously recognized Google’s monopolistic behaviors. Mehta is now tasked with assessing the remedy phase of this case. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater highlighted the bipartisan nature of the case. Slater noted the involvement of 49 states alongside federal authorities in challenging Google’s competitive practices.

DOJ official David Dahlquist referred to the current situation as a pivotal moment for restoring market competition. The Trump DOJ’s stance reflects a continued commitment to ensuring monopolistic behaviors do not compromise competition in the digital market.

Image by Anthony Quintano.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more