Thursday, January 22, 2026

Vivek Ramaswamy Has Quit Social Media, Here’s Why:

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Vivek Ramaswamy announced his decision to delete social media apps X and Instagram as part of his New Year’s resolutions.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Vivek Ramaswamy, Ohio Governor candidate, and his campaign team.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, early January 2026.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “I plan to become a social-media teetotaler in 2026. On New Year’s Eve, I deleted X and Instagram from my phone.” – Vivek Ramaswamy

🎯IMPACT: Ramaswamy’s move is intended to connect directly with voters and avoid the distortions of social media feedback.

IN FULL

Republican candidate for Ohio governor Vivek Ramaswamy has deleted his X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram accounts, framing the move as a personal New Year’s resolution for 2026. Ramaswamy stated that although his campaign staff will continue to post on those platforms, he personally plans to prioritize face-to-face conversations with voters.

“I plan to become a social-media teetotaler in 2026. On New Year’s Eve, I deleted X and Instagram from my phone,” he wrote in The Wall Street Journal, arguing: “There’s a fine line between using the internet to distribute your message and inadvertently allowing constant internet feedback to alter your message. That isn’t using social media; it’s letting social media use you.”

The 2024 Republican primary contender complained that the posts you are most likely to see on social media “are the most negative and bombastic, because they’re most likely to receive rapid ‘likes’ and ‘reposts’– and that drives revenue for social media content creators.”

Ramaswamy alluded to some of the criticism he has received on social media in recent months, for instance, after arguing that American tech firms hire foreigners over locals because “American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence,” that school should be year-round, and that “your lineage and your genetics tied to the blood and soil of the country” are irrelevant to what it means to be an American.

“In 2025 I saw a spate of shocking racial slurs and worse on social media. Yet that same year I visited tens of thousands of voters across all of Ohio’s 88 counties–from inner cities to farms, union halls to factories, Republican rallies to one-on-one discussions with protesters–and I didn’t hear a single bigoted remark from an Ohio voter the entire year,” Ramaswamy stressed.

He also cited a “recent report revealed that engagement with the X account of the now-notorious white nationalist Nick Fuentes shows signs of being ‘unusually fast, unusually concentrated and unusually foreign in origin.’ Another investigation showed that hundreds of bots drove the pro-Democrat #BlueCrew hashtag, amplifying false claims that the assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, Pa., was staged.”

Ramawamy suggested that there is an echo chamber effect on social media, where users are repeatedly shown content that aligns with their existing views, thereby developing a distorted picture of public sentiment. While he said that he is not advising others to quit social media, h encouraged fellow politicians to be cautious about relying on it as a measure of public opinion.

In a lighter moment, he acknowledged that if this resolution follows the pattern of previous ones, he “might be back to scrolling X by March.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Originators of Brigitte Macron Transgender Claim Found Guilty by Court.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: A court in Paris, France, found ten people guilty of “cyber-bullying” Brigitte Macron, wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, for claiming she is a man and making “malicious” remarks about the fact that their relationship started when he was 15, and she was 39.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Brigitte Macron, her lawyer Jean Ennochi, and ten defendants.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The verdict was delivered in Paris on Monday. The events span several years, with related incidents ongoing.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The most important things are the prevention courses and the suspension of some of the accounts,” said Brigitte Macron’s lawyer Jean Ennochi.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling highlights the harsh restrictions of free speech in Europe, and comes ahead of further lawsuits related to the French first lady in the U.S.

IN FULL

A court in Paris, France, has convicted ten people for “cyber-bullying” Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, for making claims that the French first lady is transgender and making “malicious” remarks about the couple’s 24-year age difference. Notably, their relationship started when Emmanuel Macron was just 15, and Brigitte, then 39, was a teacher at his school.

Eight men and two women were sentenced on Tuesday. Most received suspended prison terms of up to eight months and were ordered to attend prevention courses on online harassment. One defendant was taken into custody after failing to appear in court. Several of those convicted were also handed temporary suspensions of their social media accounts.

Among them was Delphine Jegousse, known on social media as Amandine Roy, who claims to be a medium and is regarded as a key originator of the rumors that Brigitte Macron was born a man.

In its ruling, the court said the defendants had used “malicious, degrading and insulting language” and acted with a clear intention to harm the French first lady. Her lawyer, Jean Ennochi, said that the “most important things are the prevention courses and the suspension of some of the accounts.”

The ruling highlights the harsh restrictions on free speech in Europe, with defamation, particularly against public figures, being treated as a criminal offense, usually with no right to a trial by jury. This has led to clashes between European governments and the Trump administration, with prominent figures such as Vice President J.D. Vance questioning whether the former share American values, and others warning that European censorship is encroaching on Americans.

The Paris case comes as the Macrons prepare for a separate defamation lawsuit in the United States against commentator Candace Owens. Owens previously said she would stake her “entire professional reputation” on the claim that Brigitte Macron “is in fact a man.”

Image by Mélanie Praquin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Top AI YouTube Channels Rake in $114 Million Annually from Low-Quality Content.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: A report by Kapwing reveals that low-quality AI-generated videos, dubbed “brainrot,” have amassed over 63 billion views on YouTube, generating approximately $114 million annually.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Video-editing company Kapwing, AI content creators, YouTube viewers, and researchers such as Emilie Owens and Eryk Salvaggio.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The report surveyed 15,000 YouTube channels globally in 2025, covering countries including South Korea, Spain, and Egypt.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Generative AI is a tool, and like any tool it can be used to make both high- and low-quality content,” said a YouTube spokesman.

🎯IMPACT: AI-generated content is influencing YouTube’s ecosystem, sparking debates about quality, mental health, and the platform’s role in regulating such material.

IN FULL

A report by video-editing company Kapwing has found that low-quality, AI-generated videos, often described as “brainrot,” are becoming a significant part of YouTube’s ecosystem, drawing vast audiences and substantial revenue. According to the study, these videos have accumulated more than 63 billion views and generate an estimated $114 million annually, with researchers suggesting they may make up over 20 percent of content appearing in users’ feeds.

Kapwing reviewed 15,000 of the world’s most popular YouTube channels and identified 278 that publish only AI-generated material. These channels are global in scope and have amassed large followings. Spanish AI-only channels collectively attract about 20 million subscribers, while Egyptian ones have roughly 18 million. In South Korea, trending AI channels have recorded 8.45 billion views—well above the country’s population.

The content typically includes fabricated K-pop music videos, looped AI-created animal clips, and other repetitive visuals designed to maximize watch time. Kapwing named the Indian channel Bandar Apna Dost as the most-viewed AI-only channel, with 2.4 billion views and an estimated $3.9 million in revenue. Another example, Singapore-based Pouty Frenchie, features videos of a French bulldog aimed at children and could generate close to $3.8 million a year.

Researchers and mental health experts have raised concerns about the effects of prolonged exposure to such material. Emilie Owens, a media researcher at the University of Oslo, said young people often turn to “brainrot” videos as a way to escape stress.

Cambridge University researcher Eryk Salvaggio warned that AI-generated content spreads easily and is often designed to provoke outrage. The Newport Institute, a U.S. mental health organization, has cautioned that excessive consumption could contribute to behavioral addiction and harm cognitive skills such as decision-making and problem-solving.

A YouTube spokesman responded to the findings by saying, “Generative AI is a tool, and like any tool it can be used to make both high- and low-quality content. We remain focused on connecting our users with high-quality content, regardless of how it was made.” The company added that it continues to enforce community guidelines and remove policy-violating videos.

The debate over AI’s impact extends beyond online video. Concerns about safety at the highest levels of AI development have been highlighted by comments attributed to an OpenAI scientist who reportedly said, “We’re definitely going to build a bunker before we release AGI,” reflecting anxiety over artificial general intelligence.

Other research has linked AI-powered pricing systems to higher grocery costs for consumers, while lawsuits and advocacy groups have warned about the mental health risks of intense AI chatbot use among teenagers.

Image by Rego Korosi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.artificial

show less
show more

Rubio Warns Against European Censorship Encroaching on Americans’ Free Speech.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed concerns over the erosion of free speech in Europe during a year-end press conference.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the Trump administration, the European Union (EU), the British government, and organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Rubio spoke at his year-end press conference in December in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Are we going to live in a world where some American puts up a social media post and then gets to some airport somewhere and is arrested?” – Marco Rubio

🎯IMPACT: Rubio emphasized the need for a robust response to free speech concerns in Europe, warning of implications for Americans and global platforms.

IN FULL

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that declining free speech protections in Europe could have direct consequences for Americans, saying the issue is a top priority for the U.S. State Department. Speaking at a press conference, Rubio questioned, “Are we going to live in a world where some American puts up a social media post and then gets to some airport somewhere and is arrested?”

Concerns over speech restrictions in Europe have increasingly drawn scrutiny from the Trump administration. In July, the State Department posted on X (formerly Twitter) that “in Europe, thousands are being convicted for the crime of criticizing their own governments. This Orwellian message won’t fool the United States. Censorship is not freedom.”

Reports from Britain suggest that approximately 30 people are arrested each day over online messages considered offensive. Human rights organizations, including Alliance Defending Freedom and Amnesty International, have raised concerns about speech regulations in other European countries, including France and Germany, where arrests related to social media posts have risen in recent years.

Rubio specifically criticized the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), a sweeping regulatory framework that allows the European Commission—the bloc’s unelected executive—to fine technology companies for failing to address so-called disinformation and “illegal content”. He pointed to ongoing enforcement actions against X, noting, “As you recently saw, you know, X is facing this massive multi-million dollar fine that they’re going to have to pay, I guess, because they want to continue to operate.”

Dr. Adina Portaru, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom International, said the DSA’s reach extends far beyond large technology firms. “The DSA can impact anyone, can impact content creators and influencers and preachers and political dissidents and any kind of content online can be regulated by the DSA through its architecture,” she said, warning that the law lacks sufficient safeguards for lawful freedom of expression.

The Trump administration has framed European enforcement actions as not only a threat to domestic speech within Europe, but also to Americans whose content is accessible overseas. Administration officials have argued that penalties imposed on U.S.-based platforms amount to an attack on American free speech rights and have reportedly discussed potential responses, including travel bans on European officials involved in censorship enforcement.

Rubio emphasized the importance of addressing the issue with allied nations, saying shared democratic values, including freedom of speech, must remain central to transatlantic cooperation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

NYC Mayor-Elect Mamdani Appointee Resigned Just One Day After Being Named to Top Job, Here’s Why:

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: New York City Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani’s (D) newly-hired Director of Appointments, Catherine Almonte Da Costa, resigned after past anti-Semitic social media posts were uncovered.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Catherine Almonte Da Costa, Zohran Mamdani, and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The resignation occurred on Thursday, December 18, 2025, in New York City.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Her social media footprint includes posts from more than a decade ago that echo classic antisemitic tropes and otherwise demean Jewish people.” – Anti-Defamation League

🎯IMPACT: Da Costa stepped down just one day after her appointment, with Mamdani accepting her resignation.

IN FULL

Catherine Almonte Da Costa, newly named as Director of Appointments in New York City Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani‘s (D) socialist administration, resigned on Thursday following the resurfacing of anti-Semitic social media posts she made over a decade ago. Since winning the mayoral race in November, Mamdani has announced a number of concerning appointments, including Da Costa, convicted armed robber Mysonne Linen, and the political left’s favorite terrorism lawyer, Ramzi Kassem.

The resignation came after pressure from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which publicized social media posts by Da Costa that the organization says “echo classic antisemitic tropes and otherwise demean Jewish people.” In a January 2011 post highlighted by the ADL, Da Costa complained, “Money hungry Jews smh [shaking my head].” In another, she referred to a train route as “the Jew train.”

Previously, Da Costa served in various roles—including in the Office of Appointments—in former Mayor Bill de Blasio‘s government.

“As the mother of two Jewish children, I deeply regret and apologize for these tweets from well over a decade ago,” De Costa said in response to her resurfaced social media history. “These comments do not in any way, shape, or form reflect who I am or my views and beliefs today.” Meanwhile, her husband, Ricky Da Costa, also responded to the controversy, calling his wife’s past remarks “dumb,” but insisted her remorse “is deeply genuine.”

Zohran Mamdani, who had announced Da Costa’s appointment just one day prior, accepted her resignation while also stressing her “deep remorse” over the past anti-Semitic comments.

During the 2025 mayoral campaign, Mamdani was scrutinized over his ties to radical Islamists. In October, he shared a photo on social media in which he appeared alongside radical Islamist Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In the post, Mamdani praised Wahhaj as one of America’s foremost Muslim religious scholars and a local Brooklyn community leader.

Image by Bingjiefu He.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Man Sentenced to 18 Months for Anti-Immigration Social Media Posts.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A British X (formerly Twitter) user was sentenced to 18 months in prison for anti-immigration posts that were viewed just 33 times.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Luke Yarwood, 36, was the man the courts sentenced, with his brother-in-law reporting him to police.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The posts were sent between December 21, 2024, and January 29, 2025, in Bournemouth, England.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Start off burning every migrant hotel then head off to MPs’ houses and Parliament, we need to take over by FORCE.” – Luke Yarwood on X.

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights ongoing tensions around immigration, asylum, and censorship in the United Kingdom.

IN FULL

Luke Yarwood, a British X (formerly Twitter) user, has been imprisoned for 18 months after posting anti-immigration messages online that were viewed just 33 times. The posts were sent following a car attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany, by a Saudi immigrant in December 2024.

Yarwood was reported to the police by his brother-in-law, with whom he had a strained relationship. The case has drawn comparisons to that of Lucy Connolly, who was previously imprisoned for saying she would not care if hotels housing asylum seekers were set on fire following a mass stabbing targeting young girls, perpetrated by the son of two Rwandan migrants.

During sentencing, prosecutor Siobhan Linsley told the court that Yarwood’s messages, despite their limited audience, “had the potential to incite disorder,” particularly in areas around migrant hotels in Bournemouth. The defence argued that the posts were the “impotent rantings of a socially isolated man” and posed no realistic threat, pointing to his mental health struggles and lack of influence.

“Violence and murder is the only way now. Start off burning every migrant hotel then head off to MPs’ houses and Parliament, we need to take over by FORCE,” Yarwood wrote in one of the posts.

Judge Jonathan Fuller described the posts as “odious” and stated they were clearly intended to incite racial hatred and violence. He said immediate custody was required because of the risk such messages could pose if acted upon. Notably, crimes that most members of the public would consider far more serious, such as a hotel migrant sexually assaulting a child, have not resulted in prison terms in recent months, leading to complaints of two-tier justice.

The case comes amid growing scrutiny of how the British authorities police online speech. Thousands of people are arrested annually under communications and public order laws for social media posts deemed threatening or offensive. For instance, earlier in 2025, comedy writer Graham Linehan was arrested over social media posts critical of transgender activists, sparking criticism from civil liberties advocates.

British police faced backlash after officers visited the home of an American cancer patient over Facebook posts, and a retired police officer was arrested following an X post, with commentators likening the raid on his home to “Stasi-style” tactics.

Image by Carlosgg1961.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

The State Department Has Revoked 85,000 Visas Under Trump.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has revoked 85,000 visas across all categories since January, according to a State Department official.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump’s administration, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the State Department.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The revocations date from late January to December 9, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These are people who pose a direct threat to our communities’ safety, and we do not want to have them in our country.” – State Department official

🎯IMPACT: Visa revocations have doubled compared to last year, with terrorism, overstays, DUIs, assault, theft, and public safety threats among the causes.

IN FULL

The Trump administration has rescinded 85,000 visas across all categories since President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration in January, the State Department revealed on Tuesday. The revocations include 8,000 student visas and more than double the numbers for 2024.

“Some of the top reasons why we revoked the visas were DUIs, assaults, and theft, which together account for almost half of the revocations in the past year,” a State Department official said regarding the revocations. They added: “These are people who pose a direct threat to our communities’ safety, and we do not want to have them in our country.”

The State Department announced in November that it had pulled 80,000 visas so far. Among the causes for the revocations were terrorism, overstays, DUIs, assault, theft, and public safety threats. The agency also reiterated its use of social media vetting during visa screenings, advising applicants to maintain public profiles during the vetting process.

On September 15, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the department would move to revoke the visas of foreign nationals who celebrated the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk. “Visa revocations are underway. If you are here on a visa and cheering on the public assassination of a political figure, prepare to be deported,” Sec. Rubio wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). In October, the State Department confirmed at least six foreigners celebrating the assassination had their visas revoked.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration announced last week that it would begin restricting visa approvals for Nigerian nationals who are believed to have engaged in violence against Christians.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Cult Exploits Children on Discord and Roblox.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Five men associated with “Greggy’s Cult” have been indicted for child exploitation, production and distribution of child pornography, and conspiracy to communicate threats.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hector Bermudez, Zachary Dosch, Rumaldo Valdez, David Brilhante, and Camden Rodriguez, along with other members of “Greggy’s Cult,” and their victims.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged crimes occurred between 2019 and 2021, with Bermudez residing in the Eastern District of New York during the commission of the offenses.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The defendants and other members of Greggy’s Cult captured images of the sexually explicit conduct and shared it to other Discord servers and amongst themselves,” prosecutors say.

🎯IMPACT: The indictment highlights the dangers of online platforms being exploited by predators targeting children, prompting calls for stricter protections.

IN FULL

Federal prosecutors have charged five men in connection with an online exploitation ring dubbed “Greggy’s Cult.” The defendants from Queens, New York; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Honolulu, Hawaii; San Diego, California; and Longmont, Colorado, are accused of running a criminal enterprise that coerced children as young as 11 into producing explicit videos. Authorities say the group used Discord servers and gaming platforms like Roblox and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive to groom and blackmail victims.

According to the indictment, the men forced victims to perform degrading acts, sometimes under the threat of violence or exposure, then recorded and distributed those videos. In some cases, victims were manipulated into writing cult members’ names on their bodies or professing loyalty; in others, they were pressured to self-harm or kill themselves. The defendants are charged with child exploitation, conspiracy to produce and distribute child pornography, and conspiracy to communicate interstate threats.

“The defendants and other members of Greggy’s Cult captured images of the sexually explicit conduct and shared it to other Discord servers and amongst themselves,” prosecutors allege. The abuse reportedly took place over several years, from 2019 through 2021.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said, “The Department of Justice will continue to protect children, support survivors, and hold accountable anyone who preys on the vulnerable—online or offline—with every tool we have.” Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel added, “The FBI is sending a message to those individuals involved in criminal activity through violent online networks: you can’t hide in the shadows hovering over a keyboard – we will find and hold accountable those who participate in these illegal and heinous acts.”

The case against Greggy’s Cult is not an isolated incident; experts and reports have repeatedly highlighted how social media sites and online games have become tools for predators. For instance, on platforms like Instagram, researchers found a “vast pedophile network” whose accounts used explicit hashtags and recommendation algorithms to connect buyers and sellers of child sexual abuse material.

Similarly, the gaming platform Roblox, used by Greggy’s Cult, has been repeatedly accused in lawsuits of failing to protect children from predators who exploit its chat and game-creation features. Critics argue that the combination of a young user base, insufficient age verification, and easy access to private messages makes many popular platforms a dangerous “digital playground” for predators.

Image by Coolcaesar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trial Begins for Ten Accused of Calling Brigitte Macron Trans, Making ‘Malicious Remarks’ About Age Gap with French Prez.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Ten individuals are set to stand trial in Paris for alleged sexist cyber-bullying of Brigitte Macron, French President Emmanuel Macron’s wife, for suggesting she is transgender and making “malicious remarks” about the fact that their relationship began when she was 39 and he was 15.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The defendants include an elected official, a gallery owner, a teacher, and others accused of spreading unsubstantiated claims about Mrs. Macron.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The trial is taking place this week in Paris, and hearings are scheduled for Monday and Tuesday.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward,” said the Macrons’ lawyer, Tom Clare.

🎯IMPACT: If convicted, the defendants face up to two years in prison, while the Macrons continue to pursue legal action to defend their reputations.

IN FULL

Ten defendants are on trial in Paris, France, this week, accused of participating in a coordinated campaign of sexist cyber-harassment against Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron. The case centers on allegations that the defendants spread false and malicious rumors that Mrs. Macron is a man, while also making “malicious remarks” about the couple’s 24-year age gap, with their relationship starting when Mrs. Macron was a 39-year-old teacher and her husband was a 15-year-old schoolboy. French prosecutors allege the commentary went beyond criticism and amounted to targeted defamation intended to humiliate and discredit the first lady.

Among the accused are Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, who previously faced slander convictions for claiming that Mrs Macron never existed and that her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, had transitioned to become her. Although they were initially found guilty, a court of appeals later overturned the decision, ruling that their remarks did not legally qualify as defamation. Mrs. Macron is appealing that ruling. If convicted, the defendants in this case could face up to two years in prison.

President Macron claims that taking legal action is not just a personal response but a matter of principle. He described the attacks as part of a broader campaign to harm his wife and destabilize public trust, saying the falsehoods were spread “with the aim of causing harm, in the service of an ideology and with established connections to far-right leaders.”

The Paris trial comes amid growing debate in Europe about how far governments should go in regulating online speech. Countries such as Germany have stepped up enforcement of digital conduct laws, including investigations into online hate speech and insults, which are outlawed in the country. Germany’s Network Enforcement Act, known as NetzDG, requires large social-media platforms to remove “clearly illegal” content within 24 hours or face fines of up to 50 million euros. European officials argue these measures are necessary to combat harassment and misinformation, but critics warn they erase free expression.

The European Union’s broader Digital Services Act has further tightened requirements for major platforms to police so-called “harmful content.”

Image by Mélanie Praquin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump TikTok Deal Secures Majority Stake and Data Control for U.S. Investors.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is expected to finalize a deal this week that will give American investors majority control of TikTok and safeguard U.S. user data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, ByteDance, Silver Lake, Michael Dell, Lachlan Murdoch, and Rupert Murdoch.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Details of the deal emerged following meetings in Madrid, Spain, last week, and a phone call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We look forward to getting that deal closed.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: Thousands of American jobs and small businesses are expected to be protected, with the government receiving a multibillion-dollar fee for orchestrating the deal.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump plans to sign an agreement this week that hands majority ownership of TikTok to U.S. investors, shifting its operations to a new joint venture based in America. Oracle, started by Trump’s supporter Larry Ellison, will handle the app’s security. In the restructured company, China-based ByteDance’s ownership will drop below 20 percent, while American backers such as Oracle and Silver Lake take hold of roughly 80 percent.

The setup includes a seven-person board, with ByteDance getting just one seat. Oracle will manage the ongoing oversight of data for more than 170 million American users, with China barred from accessing it.

Talks with China zeroed in on the app’s content-recommendation algorithm. ByteDance appears set to duplicate and license it to the U.S.-led entity. White House officials highlighted how the pact preserves thousands of jobs and supports small businesses, with one estimating it could safeguard “hundreds of billions of dollars over the next five years.”

Trump mentioned that U.S. investors like Michael Dell, along with Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch, are part of the arrangement. His team is recruiting “patriots that love America”, skilled in national and cyber security, to bolster the operation. The U.S. government also stands to collect a multibillion-dollar payment for brokering the deal.

Earlier, the President pushed back TikTok’s ban deadline three times, praising the app’s “tremendous value.” The terms came together after a sit-down between American and Chinese representatives in Madrid, Spain, plus a call between Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping. Trump said Xi had “approved” the agreement and voiced confidence in wrapping it up soon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more