Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Lefty UK Comic Arrested Over Anti-Trans Tweets.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Graham Linehan, co-creator of the comedy series Father Ted, was arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport for posts shared on the X social media platform (formerly Twitter).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Graham Linehan, an Irish comedy writer and BAFTA winner based in the United Kingdom, and five armed police officers at Heathrow Airport.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred at Heathrow Airport upon the left-wing but gender critical comic’s arrival from Arizona on September 1. He was later taken to a hospital due to health concerns.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I was arrested at an airport like a terrorist, locked in a cell like a criminal, taken to hospital because the stress nearly killed me, and banned from speaking online, all because I made jokes that upset some psychotic crossdressers.” – Graham Linehan

🎯IMPACT: Linehan’s arrest has sparked discussions on the ongoing collapse of freedom of speech in Britain, and British law enforcement’s eagerness to intervene in online disputes.

IN FULL

Graham Linehan, the Irish comedy writer behind the hit shows Father Ted, The IT Crowd, and Black Books, was arrested by five armed police officers at London‘s Heathrow Airport over three social media posts. Linehan, a leftist but also a longtime critic of gender ideology, claims he was taken into custody immediately after arriving from Arizona on September 1. The posts in question, which he shared on X (formerly Twitter), have been described by authorities as potentially inciting violence.

One post, dated April 20, read: “If a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent, abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls.” A separate post from April 19 included a photo of a transgender rights rally with the caption: “A photo you can smell,” followed by another post that stated, “I hate them. Misogynists and homophobes. F*** em.”

Linehan detailed the experience in a blog post, writing, “The moment I stepped off the plane at Heathrow, five armed police officers were waiting. Not one, not two—five. They escorted me to a private area and told me I was under arrest for three tweets.” He says the stress of the incident caused his blood pressure to spike to dangerous levels, leading to a brief hospital stay. Authorities later confirmed he was released on bail while investigations continue.

This is not the first time Linehan has faced repercussions for speaking out against transgenderism. His original Twitter account was permanently suspended in 2020 for what the platform called “hateful conduct,” including remarks like “Men aren’t women tho.” He has been a vocal defender of the rights of real women to single-sex spaces and sports, and has consistently criticized what he calls the erasure of women in favor of radical gender ideology.

Linehan says the United Kingdom has become “hostile to freedom of speech” and accused British law enforcement of going out of its way to appease gender ideologues. “If they think this is going to silence me,” he wrote, “they’ve got another thing coming.”

The Free Speech Union has said it “do[es] not believe Graham’s arrest or the bail conditions imposed”—said to comprise solely of a ban on posting on X—”were lawful.” They added that they would be “backing him all the way in his fight against these preposterous allegations and the disproportionate response from the police.”

Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, another noted critic of gender ideology, said of the arrest, “What the f**k has the UK become? This is totalitarianism. Utterly deplorable.”

Image by republica GmbH.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Elon Musk, X Settle Lawsuit with Former Twitter Employees.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Elon Musk and his social media platform X (formerly Twitter) have reached a tentative settlement with former employees who sued for $500 million in severance pay.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Elon Musk, X (formerly Twitter), and former employees led by Courtney McMillian.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The settlement was reported on Wednesday in a court filing in San Francisco.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The parties have reached a settlement agreement in principle and began negotiating the terms of a long form settlement agreement,” according to court documents.

🎯IMPACT: The settlement, once finalized, could resolve disputes over severance pay for approximately 6,000 former employees.

IN FULL

Elon Musk and his social media platform X (formerly Twitter) have tentatively settled a lawsuit with former employees seeking $500 million in severance payments. On Wednesday, a court filing showed that both sides asked a San Francisco U.S. appeals court to postpone an upcoming hearing to finalize the settlement documents.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by ex-Twitter employee Courtney McMillian, alleges that around 6,000 workers were denied benefits outlined in the company’s severance plan. Employees claimed the company offered some of them only one month’s severance pay at most, while others received none, despite promises of up to six months’ salary.

According to court filings, “the parties have reached a settlement agreement in principle and began negotiating the terms of a long form settlement agreement.” The settlement’s specifics remain undisclosed and await court approval.

The layoffs at Twitter followed Musk’s 2022 acquisition of the company, part of aggressive cost-cutting that slashed over half the workforce. This move preceded a broader tech industry trend, with companies like Facebook, Google, and Microsoft also cutting thousands of jobs over the following years.

Musk is known for using significant workforce reductions to lower costs. He attempted similar reforms to the federal workforce at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during the early months of the Trump administration, albeit with limited success.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Woman Imprisoned for Anti-Immigration Social Media Post Released.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A woman convicted of “inciting racial hatred” via a social media post following the mass murder of young girls in Southport, England, by a teen of migrant background has been released from prison after serving 40 percent of her sentence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lucy Connolly, 42, a mother and wife of a Northampton town councillor, and various legal and political figures, including Judge Melbourne Inman and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Connolly posted to X (formerly Twitter) on July 29, 2024, and she was arrested on August 6, 2024. She was released from His Majesty’s Prison (HMP) Peterborough in August 2025.

🎯IMPACT: The case has reignited debates over free speech and two-tier justice in the United Kingdom.

IN FULL

A British woman who was imprisoned for a social media post calling for mass deportations has been released early, with her case having ignited fierce debate over what critics are calling the UK’s two-tier justice system.

Lucy Connolly, 42, was freed from HMP Peterborough after serving roughly 13 months of a 31-month sentence for “inciting racial hatred.” Connolly was convicted over a tweet posted after the Southport stabbing attack in 2024, where three young girls were brutally killed by the son of two Rwandan asylum seekers.

The post read: “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f**king hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these families will now have to endure. If that makes me racist so be it.”

The post was deleted a few hours later, but it triggered swift police action. Connolly was arrested just days later, on August 6, 2024. Connolly, who is married to a local councillor for the Conservative Party in Northampton, pleaded guilty, in large part because she was refused bail—despite being a nonviolent first-time offender—and faced a lengthy spell in jail ahead of her trial, possibly as long as a reduced sentence for pleading guilty.

Many have noted that the draconian length of her sentence—31 months—was far longer than many sentences handed to pedophiles and violent criminals. Notably, Salman Iftikhar, a Pakistani businessman with the British equivalent of a green card, in recent weeks received only 15 months for physically accosting an air stewardess, calling her a “white sheep-shagging bitch,” and threatening that she would be “gang raped and set on fire” after the hotel she was staying at was “blown up.”

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, of the far-left Labour Party, defended the conviction during Prime Minister’s Questions, stating, “I am strongly in favor of free speech… but I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.”

The Trump administration in the United States takes the view that you cannot claim to be in favor of free speech while imprisoning people for social media commentary, with a recent State Department human rights report warning of “serious restrictions on freedom of expression” in Britain that have “worsened” under Starmer.

Connolly will complete the remainder of her sentence out on license in the community, with the possibility of being returned to prison if she breaches her license conditions.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Germany Dismisses U.S. Free Speech Concerns Despite Rising Social Media Arrests.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: German officials have pushed back at a U.S. State Department human rights report that claims the country is suppressing free speech online.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: State Department, German government officials, German federal spokesman Steffen Meyer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: August 2025, Germany and the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “A very high degree of freedom of expression prevails, and we will continue to defend this in every possible way,” claimed German federal spokesman Steffen Meyer.

🎯IMPACT: The pushback comes as German citizens continue to be arrested for social media posts branded hate speech or public insults by German government officials.

IN FULL

German authorities have dismissed accusations in a recent U.S. State Department human rights report that alleges the country is suppressing free expression, particularly on social media. The U.S. report expressed concern that German authorities are restricting public discourse in the name of combating hate speech.

“There is no censorship here in Germany,” said government spokesman Steffen Meyer, representing Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s cabinet. “A very high degree of freedom of expression prevails, and we will continue to defend this in every possible way,” Meyer claimed.

However, so-called hate speech against immigrants and other groups is indeed an arrestable offense in Germany, as are public insults, particularly against politicians and other officials. In one instance, a 64-year-old man was fined €825 (around $962) and police raided his home after he shared a meme that labeled former Economy Minister Robert Habeck a “professional idiot.”

In one particularly egregious case, a German woman was imprisoned for defamation after she called an immigrant gang rapist a “disgraceful rapist pig” and “disgusting freak”—getting a harsher punishment than the rapist himself, who received only a suspended sentence.

Vice President J.D. Vance has sharply criticized Europe’s handling of free speech, including in Germany. During a speech at the Munich Security Conference in February, he asserted, “Across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.” He blamed European governments for using “ugly, Soviet‑era words like misinformation and disinformation” to suppress dissenting viewpoints, arguing that such practices protect entrenched interests, not democracy.

“The threat that I worry the most about vis‑à‑vis Europe is not Russia… It’s the threat from within. The retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values,” he said. He emphasized that “democracy rests on the sacred principle that the voice of the people matters.”

Vance later questioned whether the U.S. taxpayer should continue defending Germany if “you get thrown in jail in Germany for posting a mean tweet.”

Image by Michael Lucan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

JFK’s Grandson Targets Melania Trump in Crossdressing Video Rant.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Jack Schlossberg, grandson of John F. Kennedy, mocked Melania Trump in an Instagram video while wearing a blonde wig and imitating her voice.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jack Schlossberg, Melania Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and social media users responding to the video.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The video was posted on Instagram on Sunday, following Melania Trump’s recent letter to Vladimir Putin.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This person needs to be far, far away from America’s 250 commission,” a social media user commented in response to the video.

🎯IMPACT: The video sparked backlash on social media, with users criticizing Schlossberg for his disrespectful portrayal of the First Lady.

IN FULL

Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of the late President John F. Kennedy, caused a stir on social media after posting an Instagram video mocking First Lady Melania Trump. Wearing a blonde wig, Schlossberg imitated the First Lady’s voice in a video that targeted her recent letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

In the letter, Melania Trump urged Putin to end the violence in Ukraine and protect the innocence of children affected by the war. Schlossberg’s video took aim at this gesture, and social media users were quick to condemn his actions, calling him “disrespectful” and “unhinged.”

One user commented, “What a complete nutter,” while another remarked that “This person needs to be far, far away from America’s 250 Commission.”

Schlossberg has previously opposed Republican efforts to rename part of the Kennedy Center after Melania Trump. In a prior post, he cited a 1983 federal law to argue against the move, stating, “Plain reading of the statute makes clear — YOU CANT DO THAT.” He also tagged President Donald J. Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) in his post.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Sydney Sweeney ‘Great Jeans’ Campaign Sparks ‘Nazi Propaganda’ Meltdown.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Sydney Sweeney’s new American Eagle ad campaign has received backlash from left-wing media outlets and social media users over its tagline, which they irrationally believe promotes white supremacy and eugenics.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sydney Sweeney, American Eagle, and far-left social media users critical of the campaign.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The campaign launched ahead of the back-to-school shopping season, with ads appearing in New York City, Las Vegas, and online.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Maybe I’m too f***ing woke. But getting a blue-eyed, blonde, white woman and focusing your campaign around her having perfect genetics feels weird,” one user wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

🎯IMPACT: The campaign has drawn criticism for its messaging while also raising funds for domestic violence awareness through sales of “The Sydney Jean.”

IN FULL

Sydney Sweeney’s collaboration with American Eagle has sparked outrage among radical leftists on social media due to the campaign’s tagline, “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Genes,” which was later altered to say “Jeans.” Progressive and left-wing activists and newspapers, such as The Guardian, argue that the phrase “great genes” has historically been associated with eugenics.

The campaign features Sweeney, a blonde, blue-eyed white actress widely known for her attractiveness, in various promotional materials for the limited-run “Sydney Jean.” MSNBC denounced the ads as symbolic of “an unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness,” with producer Hannah Holland claiming that “The internet has been quick to condemn the advertisement as noninclusive at best and as overtly promoting ‘white supremacy’ and ‘Nazi propaganda’ at worst.”

Some far-left social media users, amplified by the media, claimed the campaign’s messaging was “tone deaf,” with one commenting on X (formerly Twitter), “This is what happens when you have no people of color in a room.”

“Maybe I’m too f***ing woke. But getting a blue-eyed, blonde, white woman and focusing your campaign around her having perfect genetics feels weird,” another X user wrote. Others have tried to bizarrely claim the American Eagle name itself is a reference to Nazi and fascist iconography.

Despite the backlash, the campaign has a charitable component. American Eagle announced that 100 percent of the proceeds from the sale of “The Sydney Jean” will be donated to Crisis Text Line, a non-profit providing confidential mental health support. The jeans also feature a butterfly motif representing domestic violence awareness.

American Eagle’s Chief Marketing Officer Craig Brommers described the media buy for this campaign as “significantly more” than previous efforts, emphasizing its importance ahead of the back-to-school shopping season. The retailer has faced financial challenges, including a $68 million adjusted operating loss in the first quarter, adding pressure for the campaign to perform well.

The controversy follows other headline-grabbing ventures by Sweeney, including the launch of a soap product containing her bathwater, which sold out quickly and later appeared on reseller platforms for inflated prices. Notably, after the American Eagle ad campaign launched, the company saw its stock value spike, with investors speculating the association with Sweeney would boost sales.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

‘Online Safety Act’ Imposes Mass Censorship on Social Media.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: British users of the X social media platform reported being prevented from viewing anti-mass migration protest footage due to the Online Safety Act.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Social media platform X, British users, the UK Government, and the Free Speech Union.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The censorship began on Friday as the Online Safety Act was enacted across the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The purpose is suppression of the people.” – Elon Musk

🎯IMPACT: Online petitions to repeal the law have gained over 160,000 signatures, and VPN searches in Britain surged by 700%.

IN FULL

X (formerly Twitter) users in the United Kingdom are being blocked from viewing anti-mass migration protest footage and parliamentary speeches on the subject of Muslim rape gangs after the so-called Online Safety Act took effect on Friday. Crafted by the prior Conservative (Tory) government, the Online Safety Act was pitched as a means of shielding children from pornography and other graphic content online. Still, many of its provisions are more concerned with censoring political speech.

After the law came into effect on Friday, British users shared screenshots of X messages received while trying to access footage of recent anti-mass migration protests, sparked by an alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl by an Ethiopian migrant in Epping, England. The message read: “Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.”

It has also resulted in a parliamentary speech by a Conservative politician discussing Muslim groomers being censored, including quotes from victims, further suppressing an issue that the British authorities, media, and political class have failed to address.

With fines of up to £18 million (~$24.2 million) or 10 percent of a company’s global turnover for violating the Online Safety Act, social media platforms are likely to be overly cautious in moderating content to avoid penalties. On Saturday, X owner Elon Musk stated that the Online Safety Act’s “purpose is suppression of the people.”

An online petition calling for the repeal of the Online Safety Act has already garnered over 160,000 signatures, mandating parliamentary consideration for debate.

Meanwhile, searches for VPNs—software that masks IP addresses to simulate being in another country—surged by over 700 percent in Britain on Friday as users sought to bypass the new restrictions. However, the incumbent Labour Party government under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is already considering banning VPNs to prevent them from being used to bypass national censorship regulations.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Radical Views of Suspect in Anti-ICE Sniper Ambush Uncovered.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents captured Benjamin Song, a suspect accused of shooting at U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers during a riot at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, following an extensive manhunt.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Benjamin Song, 32, a former U.S. Marine Corps reservist, and law enforcement, including the FBI Dallas Field Office.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Song was captured on Tuesday, in Texas.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The FBI has worked tirelessly to arrest everyone associated with the shooting at the Prairieland Detention Center.” – FBI Special Agent in Charge R. Joseph Rothrock

🎯IMPACT: Song faces multiple charges, including aggravated assault on a public servant, aiding terrorism, and engaging in organized crime, with a bond set at $15 million.

IN FULL

Benjamin Song, 32, was apprehended by the FBI Dallas Field Office on Tuesday following a manhunt that included a $25,000 reward for information leading to his arrest. Song is accused of shooting at federal officers during a riot at the Prairieland Detention Center in Texas on July 4. The ambush resulted in a local police officer being shot in the neck.

Song, a former U.S. Marine Corps reservist, apparently has a history of social media posts containing anti-police, anti-Israel, and anti-Trump rhetoric. His posts on X (formerly Twitter) under the handle @BubbleBreakBS include statements like “Do you want to end mass shooting? Abolish the police,” and attacks on both Republicans and Democrats, including President Donald J. Trump and former President Joe Biden.

A GoFundMe campaign tied to Song referenced his involvement in activism from Hong Kong to San Francisco and claimed he was a member of the Socialist Rifle Association. The campaign raised over $3,000 for his legal defense after a 2020 arrest on other charges.

According to the Facebook group, “Behind the Masks,” which documents the lives of those who participated in the Free Hong Kong Movement, “Ben Song, a 26-year-old Uber driver from Arlington, Texas who has been a political activist since he was 13, was moved by Hong Kong’s fight for freedom and flew from the US to show his support.” The group describes him as “half Korean and half Japanese” rather than Chinese, however.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently reported an 830 percent increase in assaults on ICE agents compared to last year. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem urged politicians to condemn violence against law enforcement, stating, “This new data reflects the violence against our law enforcement in cities across the country in the last few weeks.” Senior Democrats have been demonizing ICE for weeks, with Minnesota Governor and 2024 vice presidential candidate Tim Walz going so far as to compare them to Adolf Hitler’s Gestapo.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Did X’s CEO Resign Because She Couldn’t Keep Musk in Check?

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Linda Yaccarino announced her resignation as CEO of X (formerly Twitter), following controversies involving the platform’s AI assistant, Grok. Some—including former Trump White House Chief Strategist and WarRoom host Stephen K. Bannon—speculate that Yaccarino’s exit was precipitated by her inability to keep the social media platform’s owner, Elon Musk, in check.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Linda Yaccarino, Elon Musk, Stephen K. Bannon, and, indirectly, President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Yaccarino announced her resignation on Wednesday, after serving two years as CEO of X.

💬KEY QUOTE: “After two incredible years, I’ve decided to step down as CEO of X.” – Linda Yaccarino

🎯IMPACT: Yaccarino’s departure fuels speculation about internal issues at X and coincides with tensions between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump.

IN FULL

Elon Musk reacted briefly on Wednesday to Linda Yaccarino‘s resignation as CEO of his X platform (formerly Twitter), after two years in the role, brusquely responding to her announcement: “Thank you for your contributions.” The terse reply from Musk is fueling speculation that Yaccarino’s departure was driven by deeper issues than those with X’s AI assistant, Grok, which recently drew backlash for praising Adolf Hitler, among other inappropriate behaviors.

Yaccarino took to X to share her decision, writing, “After two incredible years, I’ve decided to step down as CEO of X. When [Elon Musk] and I first spoke of his vision for X, I knew it would be the opportunity of a lifetime to carry out the extraordinary mission of this company. I’m immensely grateful to him for entrusting me with the responsibility of protecting free speech, turning the company around, and transforming X into the Everything App.” Musk acquired the social media platform—then known as Twitter—in 2022 for $44 billion.

The exchange between Musk and Yaccarino is driving speculation that the latter’s exit was more driven by her inability to assert control over the billionaire technology mogul, especially regarding his ongoing political spat with President Donald J. Trump. For instance, former White House Chief Strategist Stephen K. Bannon, referring to Musk as “Elmo,” contended that Yaccarino’s resignation was entirely because of Musk’s antics.

“We understand why you are stepping down and why you’re running. That Elmo’s out of control. Sorry, baby, that came with the job. You took the job, you took the pay, you took the warrants, you took the stock options, you took all the hundreds of millions of dollars you’re going to make,” Bannon argued.

“No, if you can’t keep Elmo in the nursery and keep him under control, you’re gonna pay a price. You are gonna pay the price. It doesn’t matter that you’re resigning today, baby. The whole scam over there, the whole complete scam of Elmo is going to be taken apart brick by brick, OK?”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Germany Wants to Prosecute a Woman Over Emojis.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A German woman faces a €1,800 (~$2,120) fine for reacting with ‘thumbs up’ emojis to a social media post about a 15-year-old killing a rapist migrant. Prosecutors claim her emojis endorsed vigilantism.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: A 64-year-old woman from Lohfelden, Hesse, and the Kassel public prosecutor’s office.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You were aware that in this way you publicly approved of an intentional killing by way of unauthorized vigilantism.” – Kassel prosecutor’s penalty order

🎯IMPACT: The case underscores Germany’s increasingly draconian policing of online speech, raising concerns about freedom of expression.

IN FULL

A German woman faces prosecution and a fine equivalent to around $2,120 for reacting with emojis to a social media post. The case highlights how even the most minimal forms of digital expression are now being scrutinized under Germany’s draconian anti-speech regime.

The 64-year-old from Lohfelden, Hesse, found herself under investigation after responding with three thumbs-up emojis beneath a post on X (formerly Twitter). The original post reported on a 15-year-old Swedish girl who had killed the migrant man who raped her, and included the comment, “Does he now have 77 virgins?”

According to the Kassel public prosecutor’s office, the woman’s emoji reaction amounted to endorsing the killing and expressing satisfaction that it had targeted a migrant. Months after her October 26 interaction, she received a formal penalty notice, ordering her to pay 60 daily rates of $35 each.

The penalty order, parts of which the woman has shared publicly, alleges: “You agreed with this post as a user (…) by clicking ‘thumbs up’ three times. You were aware that in this way you publicly approved of an intentional killing by way of unauthorized vigilantism, and you were particularly pleased that this vigilantism was perpetrated against a migrant.” Authorities also complain the “77 virgins” remark was intended to ridicule the dead rapist. This interpretation of her emoji use, entirely shaped by the prosecutor’s reading of intent, reflects a growing trend of criminalizing expressions of opinion online in Germany and Europe more generally.

The woman retains the right to appeal, and if she does, the case will proceed to a full trial. Germany’s crackdown on digital speech has seen several such incidents in recent years. Authorities have increasingly targeted individuals for online posts deemed offensive, including under Section 188 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits insults against politicians. One notable case involved a police search of a retiree’s home after he shared a meme labeling then-Economy Minister Robert Habeck a “Schwachkopf,” or “moron.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more