Tuesday, July 14, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Award-Winning Novelist Admits to Using ChatGPT.

Rie Kudan, the 2023 winner of Japan’s prestigious Akutagawa Prize, revealed in her acceptance speech on Wednesday that she used artificial intelligence (AI), including ChatGPT, to write parts of her award-winning novel.

The novelist admitted that she “made active use of generative AI like ChatGPT in writing this book” and that “about five percent of the book quoted verbatim the sentences generated by AI.” Kudan’s novel, The Tokyo Tower of Sympathy, was hailed as “flawless” by one of the judges and is set in a future where AI is integral to human existence.

The revelation comes amidst an intensifying debate on using advanced AI technologies in the art and literary worlds. The 2023 Sony World Photography Awards winner, German artist Boris Eldagsen, refused to accept his prize and revealed his “photo” was an AI-generated fake. Eldagsen said he submitted the AI-generated fake to increase debate about the issue. The winner of the 2022 Colorado State Fair prize for digital art was also revealed to be an AI-generated.

AI and its implications for the future of society are becoming an increasingly important issue, often dominating debate in the worlds of politics, economics, and business. IBM CEO Arvind Krishna told attendees at the 2024 World Economic Forum in Davos that those who don’t embrace AI will “find that you may not have a job,” while Donald Trump warned recently that AI poses a “very dangerous” threat to the United States.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Inflation Eases More Than Expected with Significant Drop in Gas Prices.

The latest inflation report shows a significant slowdown, driven by a sharp decline in energy costs, though broader price pressures remain a concern.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Inflation slowed significantly in June, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) falling 0.4 percent, its sharpest monthly decline since April 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This was driven largely by a 5.7 percent drop in energy costs, including a 9.7 percent decrease in gasoline prices.
📺 DETAIL: Despite the monthly decline, energy prices remain 15.7 percent higher than a year ago, while other categories such as food and shelter have also seen annual increases of 3.0 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, remained flat for the month and rose 2.6 percent over the past year, down slightly from May’s 2.9 percent. Analysts had anticipated a higher headline inflation rate of 3.8 percent for the year, but it came in at 3.5 percent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “A softer-than-expected reading could help reassure investors that the recent jump in oil has yet to feed through meaningfully into broader price pressures,” commented Daniela Hathorn, senior market analyst at Capital.com.
🎯 IMPACT: The report offers temporary relief to households struggling with high costs, but persistent price increases in key categories like shelter and food indicate ongoing challenges. Additionally, the Federal Reserve may still face pressure to raise interest rates depending on future inflation trends and the conflict in Iran, which has intensified in recent days after the Iranians attacked commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and President Donald J. Trump responded by declaring a ceasefire with the country “over” and launching dozens of strikes.
📺 FLASHBACK: The last time inflation dropped this sharply was in April 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the CPI fell by 0.8 percent amid economic shutdowns and plummeting demand.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The latest inflation report shows a significant slowdown, driven by a sharp decline in energy costs, though broader price pressures remain a concern.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Heatwaves Linked to Over 2,700 Deaths in England and Wales Amid AC Debate.

A new study has suggested over 2,500 people across England and Wales died during unprecedented heatwaves throughout May and June, underscoring the risks posed by extreme heat and the need for air conditioning.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A new study has suggested that almost 3,000 people have died in England and Wales due to recent heatwaves.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new study conducted by Imperial College London, the Met Office, and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, approximately 2,700 people may have died from heat-related causes during the heatwaves in England and Wales throughout May and June. Statistics for the United Kingdom’s other Home Nations, Scotland and Northern Ireland, would likely drive the estimate higher, but they are collected separately. The heatwave in June accounted for approximately 2,200 of these deaths. The elderly, infants, and those with pre-existing medical conditions were most at risk, although experts have warned that even healthy individuals face risks. The study also indicated that roughly 550 people died from heat-related causes in the last week of May alone. The study follows reports that June 2026 was England’s hottest month on record. According to scientists, extreme heat places strain on the body’s cardiovascular system, causing potentially fatal emergencies, such as heat strokes and heart attacks.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Don’t underestimate the risks. Just because you’re fit and healthy, you’re not safe.” – Professor Fredi Otto, climate scientist at Imperial College London.
🎯 IMPACT: The study underscores the threat posed by extreme heat, especially to countries that lack widespread installation of air conditioning. The researchers behind the study acknowledge their estimates are based on historical mortality data and involve assumptions that may not be entirely precise. The study follows similar figures from other European countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), recent heatwaves have resulted in over 1,000 excess deaths in Paris, the capital of France.
📺 FLASHBACK: Last month, the far-left Deputy Mayor of Paris blamed the United States for the heatwave affecting Europe and criticized American recommendations to install air conditioning (AC). “Dear American journalists and social media ‘influencers’: for days, some of you have been criticizing and making fun of Paris because the city does not have A/C in every room…OMG, this is so rich,” said Audrey Pulvar. According to the International Energy Agency, only around 20 percent of European households have AC, partly as a result of “green” and net zero mandates discouraging or conditionally banning units. Around 90 percent of U.S. households have AC.

Image by Dinkun Chen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new study has suggested over 2,500 people across England and Wales died during unprecedented heatwaves throughout May and June, underscoring the risks posed by extreme heat and the need for air conditioning.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt Claims It May Restrict Visas for Pakistan Over Refusal to Take Back Grooming Gang Leader.

The British government claims to be considering visa restrictions on the Islamic Republic of Pakistan if it refuses to take back Shabir Ahmed, a convicted grooming gang leader, following his release from prison earlier this month.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The British government is supposedly considering visa restrictions on Pakistan after the country refused to take back the Pakistan-born ringleader of a major grooming gang.
📺 DETAIL: Earlier this month, it was reported that Shabir Ahmed, the Pakistani ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, was released from prison. According to the Immigration Act of 1971, immigrants from Commonwealth countries such as Pakistan who arrived in Britain over 50 years ago and have lived in the country for more than five years cannot be deported. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who is of Pakistani heritage, is set to propose amendments to the Immigration Act in order to legally deport Ahmed, but Pakistan has since declared that it will not take the pedophile back. In response, the British government is reportedly floating visa restrictions on Pakistan unless it agrees to take him.
💬 KEY QUOTE:The country of origin must agree to take these vile criminals back and that’s why we’re working across government to explore every option in this case… I think we’ve been clear that all options remain on the table where countries don’t co-operate on the return of their nationals ” – British government spokesman
🎯 IMPACT: If Pakistan continues to refuse Ahmed’s deportation, the British government may impose visa restrictions, potentially preventing Pakistani nationals from traveling to the United Kingdom. Similar measures have been threatened against other countries in the past, such as Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Namibia in Africa. Notably, Pakistanis are one of the least productive ethnic groups in Britain, with around three times the unemployment rate of the White British population.
📺 FLASHBACK: Ahmed is a ringleader in one of many gangs involved in the broader grooming gangs scandal across the United Kingdom, which involves mostly Muslim, South Asian men targeting mostly white working-class girls for sexual abuse. Ahmed served just 14 years of an initial 19-year sentence. Ahmed was convicted alongside eight other men for rape, aiding and abetting rape and trafficking for sexual exploitation back in 2012. Ahmed was stripped of his British citizenship the same year as his conviction. Some of Ahmed’s victims were as young as 12-years-old.

Image by Susmanhamza.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government claims to be considering visa restrictions on the Islamic Republic of Pakistan if it refuses to take back Shabir Ahmed, a convicted grooming gang leader, following his release from prison earlier this month.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt Wants to Force Streaming Service Subscribers to Fund the BBC.

Britain’s government is considering revamping the country’s compulsory television license fee that funds the BBC by extending it to include households using paid streaming services like Netflix and Disney+.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: British Culture, Media, and Sport Secretary Lisa Nandy has proposed expanding the compulsory TV License that funds the BBC to include households that use streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+, and Prime Video. At present, Britons who watch live programs on television, their computer, or another device—even if none of it is BBC content—must purchase a license to fund the broadcaster, on pain of criminal fines backed by the threat of imprisonment, but people have increasingly been avoiding this by subscribing to on-demand services instead.
📺 DETAIL: Nandy suggested that viewers who watch both the BBC and streamers could pay the full license fee, while those who use streaming platforms exclusively might pay a lower charge. The BBC claims that 94 percent of British households use its services monthly, but under 80 percent pay the £180 ($240) annual fee, resulting in revenue losses. Talks are ongoing with streaming platforms, but the government has ruled out imposing a direct levy on streaming companies.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We are having an open conversation with the public, Parliament, and the BBC about this.” – Lisa Nandy
🎯 IMPACT: If implemented, the expanded license fee would force many more people to fund the public broadcaster, which is constitutionally impartial but widely accepted as having a strong institutional bias towards the political left. Streaming companies have expressed concerns about imposing additional financial burdens on subscribers or their businesses, which could deter investment in the United Kingdom.

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Britain's government is considering revamping the country's compulsory television license fee that funds the BBC by extending it to include households using paid streaming services like Netflix and Disney+.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Revealed: Henry Nowak’s Last Words to Killer Were ‘I’m Not a Racist.’

New court documents have revealed that murdered and wrongfully arrested white British teenager Henry Nowak’s last words to his killer before being stabbed were a denial of racism.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The final words of white student Henry Nowak to his Sikh killer, Vickrum Digwa, were “I’m not a racist,” according to new court documents.
📺 DETAIL: Nowak, an 18-year-old white student, was fatally stabbed by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa with an eight-inch Sikh religious dagger in Southampton, England, in December 2025. Digwa falsely accused Nowak of racism when the police arrived. Digwa’s family also falsely accused Nowak of racial abuse in their call to the police. As a result, when the police arrived, Nowak was handcuffed as he bled to death. The officers ignored Nowak’s pleas for assistance, refusing to believe he had been stabbed. According to newly obtained court documents, witnesses at the scene of his murder and wrongful arrest said Nowak’s final words to his killer were “I’m not a racist.” It was also confirmed that Digwa was not handcuffed when he was finally arrested for attempted murder and taken to the police station for questioning following Nowak’s death. Digwa was subsequently sentenced to a minimum of just 20 years in prison, which is in the process of being re-examined and potentially lengthened.
🎯 IMPACT: The revelation that Nowak felt compelled to deny a false racism accusation from his killer and his killer’s family in some of his final moments has reignited public outrage over two-tier policing in the United Kingdom. The police have faced sustained criticism for prioritizing an accusation of racism over an accusation of murder in Nowak’s case.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, it was reported that two police officers involved in Nowak’s wrongful arrest and murder were being investigated by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) for potential gross misconduct. This followed a report from the month prior that officers involved in the case had tried to frame Nowak as guilty, despite knowing that his killer had lied. In reaction to previously released bodycam footage of Nowak’s wrongful arrest and murder, Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, said the incident was “proof… that we’re living in a two-tier culture in this country, where the rights and privileges of white people matter less than those of ethnic minorities.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New court documents have revealed that murdered and wrongfully arrested white British teenager Henry Nowak's last words to his killer before being stabbed were a denial of racism.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mamdani’s Affordability Plan Fails as NYC Rents Soar.

A new report has revealed that rents in New York City have increased significantly under socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani, compounding the city’s pre-existing affordability crisis.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Rents in New York City under far-left socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) have reached an all-time high, according to a new report.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new report from The Corcoran Group, a real estate brokerage firm, rent in New York City (NYC) has reached an all-time high. Specifically, compared to last year, the median rent in Brooklyn rose by eight percent to $4,350, while the median rent in Manhattan rose by eight percent to $5,295. In Queens, specifically Rego Park, the cost of renting a studio apartment rose by over 20 percent, and the cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment rose by 12 percent. Manhattan’s vacancy rate also narrowed to under two percent and available listings in the area declined 16 percent year-over-year in June. In Brooklyn, available listings spent 30 percent fewer days on the market. “Across the board, quality apartments are commanding a premium, and renters have little room to negotiate,” wrote Gary Malin, COO of The Corcoran Group.
💬 KEY QUOTE:NYC’s housing affordability crisis is at DEFCON 1. We need to push harder on every front to address our housing shortage… Update zoning, invest more City $ in affordable units, lower the time & cost City bureaucracy imposes on construction, get 1000s of vacant regulated units back on the market. We need bold action. This is a crisis.” – City Comptroller Mark Levine on X (formerly Twitter).
🎯 IMPACT: The record-high rents underscore the extent of NYC’s ongoing affordability crisis. As Mamdani campaigned on affordability during the race for Mayor, support for the self-proclaimed socialist may wane as rental costs in NYC remain high. This data also suggests that, given the collapse in available listings, it’s unlikely that NYC’s affordability crisis can be alleviated without building more units at a faster rate, which would require meaningful cuts to city bureaucracy. 
📺 FLASHBACK: In early April, it was reported that Mamdani’s preliminary housing plans included applying “a racial equity framework to all new housing proposals to ensure fair geographic investment,” suggesting that Mamdani’s administration is primarily concerned with racial disparities in housing, rather than the cost of living. In late June, a new study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas revealed that illegal immigration under the Biden government resulted in higher home prices and rent costs, indicating that a reduction in immigration can help reduce demand-side housing pressures.

Image by TonyNorthrup.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new report has revealed that rents in New York City have increased significantly under socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani, compounding the city's pre-existing affordability crisis.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU to Restrict Social Media for Minors.

The European Union plans to introduce strict restrictions on social media for those aged under 13, mirroring a similar proposal pursued by the British government earlier this year.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) is preparing to implement strict limits on social media across all 27 of its member states, citing child safety risks.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, Ursula Von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, pushed to restrict access to social media across the continent. Von der Leyen called for age-based limits on social media platforms like TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. Formal proposals expected to be included in Von der Leyen’s State of the Union address scheduled for September. The announcement was issued alongside a paper that argued for a two-tier approach to social media. Specifically, the paper proposed that those under 13 years old should only be allowed to access social media under the supervision of parents, teachers, and caregivers for limited periods of time.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It is clear we need age-appropriate restrictions to platforms… The question is ​no ⁠longer if children face risks ‌online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online… We first need to consider the type ​of platforms that are harmful to our children… And when we ​have this clearly defined category, ‌I believe we need to consider ​phased and gradual access for different age ranges.” – Ursula Von der Leyen, President of the European Commission
🎯 IMPACT: If enacted, these measures would significantly alter how people interact with social media platforms across the EU. The mechanisms required to ensure users are old enough to use social media are likely to spark concerns about online privacy and politically-motivated censorship. The proposal follows similar measures pursued in other parts of the world, such as the United Kingdom.
📺 FLASHBACK: Last month, the British government announced its intention to restrict access to social media for those aged under 16. Crucially, the ban requires adults to upload ID to use social media to prove that they are old enough, ending online privacy. Social media companies have since warned that effectively barring access to safer, regulated platforms could incentivize children to use more dangerous, unregulated platforms.

Image by indra projects.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The European Union plans to introduce strict restrictions on social media for those aged under 13, mirroring a similar proposal pursued by the British government earlier this year.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Court Revives Autism and ADHD Lawsuits Against Tylenol.

A federal appeals court has reinstated lawsuits claiming Tylenol use during pregnancy is linked to autism and ADHD.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. appeals court has overturned a previous dismissal of lawsuits against Tylenol manufacturers, allowing claims that the drug’s use during pregnancy is linked to autism and ADHD to proceed. The court found that the lower court improperly excluded scientific evidence presented by the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses.
📰 DETAIL: The decision comes amid ongoing debate over the safety of acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, known as paracetamol in Europe, during pregnancy. While some studies suggest a potential risk, major pharmaceutical corporations and medical organizations maintain that Tylenol has not been proven unsafe for pregnant women. The appeals court emphasized that their ruling does not establish a causal link but rather addresses the admissibility of expert testimony.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We look forward to presenting that evidence to a jury.” – Ashley Keller, attorney for the plaintiffs.
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling revives hundreds of lawsuits and could influence how courts handle scientific evidence in similar cases. It also highlights the ongoing scientific and political debate surrounding the safety of common medications during pregnancy amid an unprecedented and sustained rise in autism diagnoses.
📺 FLASHBACK: President Donald J. Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “strongly recommend that women limit Tylenol use during pregnancy unless medically necessary” in September.

Image by Roadsidepictures.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A federal appeals court has reinstated lawsuits claiming Tylenol use during pregnancy is linked to autism and ADHD.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Bill Seeks to End Birthright Citizenship for Children of Illegals by Classifying Parents as ‘Invaders.’

Senator Jim Banks’s proposed Citizenship Act seeks to redefine birthright citizenship laws by targeting illegal immigrants and birth tourists as “invaders,” following a recent Supreme Court ruling.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) announced the introduction of the Citizenship Act, which aims to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and birth tourists by defining their parents as “invaders” under federal law. This comes after a Supreme Court ruling in the Trump v. Barbara case left the door open for Congress to make legislative changes to federal birthright citizenship laws.
📺 DETAIL: Banks’s legislation builds on Justice Brett Kavanaugh‘s partial concurrence in the Barbara case, which suggested that Congress could amend federal statutes to create exceptions to birthright citizenship. Banks said the legislation would codify Trump’s executive order declaring illegal immigration an “invasion” and amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to exclude children of unauthorized immigrants and birth tourists from birthright citizenship. The proposal argues that existing legal exceptions recognized in the 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark—including children of foreign diplomats and enemy forces occupying U.S. territory—could be applied to individuals Congress defines as invaders. Banks said the measure would strengthen U.S. sovereignty without requiring a constitutional amendment by relying on Congress’s authority over naturalization under Article I of the Constitution. The legislation also cites Article IV’s requirement that the federal government protect states against invasion and references writings by James Madison supporting Congress’s exclusive role in establishing uniform naturalization laws. Banks argues the bill addresses the exploitation of birthright citizenship through illegal immigration and foreign-backed birth tourism. The legislation further cites concerns about Chinese birth tourism and claims that some foreign actors have used birthright citizenship as part of broader efforts to advance national interests in the United States.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision was an unprecedented assault on American sovereignty, and we must do whatever it takes to save our country.” – Sen. Jim Banks
🎯 IMPACT: If passed, the Citizenship Act would reshape the legal framework for birthright citizenship in the U.S., potentially reducing incentives for illegal immigration and birth tourism.
📺 FLASHBACK: The 1898 Wong Kim Ark case established birthright citizenship for children born on U.S. but included exceptions for diplomats’ children, hostile occupiers’ children, and “enemies within,” which Banks’s bill now seeks to expand to include illegal immigrants and birth tourists.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Senator Jim Banks's proposed Citizenship Act seeks to redefine birthright citizenship laws by targeting illegal immigrants and birth tourists as "invaders," following a recent Supreme Court ruling.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Moves to Dismantle Globalist International Criminal Court.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has initiated a campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court, citing threats to U.S. sovereignty.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Monday, labeling it a threat to U.S. sovereignty. Rubio’s plan involves a comprehensive “whole-of-government” effort to disable the ICC’s ability to function.
📰 DETAIL: Rubio’s strategy includes diplomatic efforts, scrutinizing nations that support the ICC, and imposing visa revocations and travel bans on ICC personnel. Significantly, the U.S. never signed the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, and is not subject to its jurisdiction, yet the State Department warns it is trying to act against Americans regardless.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The ICC poses an intolerable threat to U.S. sovereignty – it claims the authority to prosecute and even imprison American servicemen and officials operating on behalf of America’s national interest. Americans never signed up for this, and all American presidents since the ICC’s ratification have maintained that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over Americans… The ICC now seeks to become the unaccountable global arbiter – positioning itself above and beyond the nation state as a supranational enforcement arm of a globalist bureaucracy empowered to persecute American servicemen and officials at will.” – U.S. State Department
🎯 IMPACT: The campaign could strain international relations, particularly with countries that refuse to stop supporting the ICC, and may lead to increased debate over legal jurisdiction and sovereignty. The State Department is stressing that there will be “Increased scrutiny of nations that refuse to reject the ICC’s false authority while relying on U.S. assistance.”
👀 FLASHBACK: Previous U.S. administrations have had contentious relationships with the ICC, with the George W. Bush administration notably overseeing the passage of the “Hauge Invasion Act,” officially the American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA), which authorizes using military force to free any American being held by the court, which is located in The Hague, in the Netherlands.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has initiated a campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court, citing threats to U.S. sovereignty.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.