Friday, July 31, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Nikki Haley Attacks Trump Over Jan 6.

Nikki Haley, the 2024 GOP hopeful, has followed in the footsteps of Democrats and establishment GOP candidates, attacking former President Donald Trump’s handling of the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021.

Joined by Republican New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu on ABC on Sunday, Haley stated, “…when President Trump had the opportunity to stop it, when he had the opportunity say it — the bully pulpit matters, people listen — he didn’t. And I hate that for the people that were there supporting him. I hate that for those of us that were watching it.”

Referencing the Capitol riot, Haley called it a “terrible day,” emphasizing the importance of leadership in such situations with her comment that the “tone at the top matters.” As a response, she promised that her presidency would be one of “no drama, no vendettas, no whining”, which appears to be a subtle critique of Trump.

On the topic of Trump’s criminal charges, some relating to the events of January 6, Haley said she would abstain from direct involvement. She stated that immunity and legal decisions should be left to the courts, despite hinting in the past that she might support a pardon for Trump. Haley made it clear that her attention would be better spent on other matters saying, “It would be wasted energy for me to sit there and focus on court cases and not focus on how to win that room that we just left.”

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Announces Agreement to Disarm Hamas as Part of Gaza Peace Plan.

A U.S.-brokered plan to disarm Hamas in Gaza could pave the way for reconstruction and a new Palestinian government in the territory, though significant conditions remain unresolved.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced a U.S.-brokered agreement to disarm Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza on Friday, a step he described as a “monumental” breakthrough in his peace plan. The deal includes Israeli withdrawal from Gaza as disarmament progresses, with an International Stabilization Force and a new Palestinian police force securing the area.
📺 DETAIL: Crucially, Hamas official Ghazi Hamad stated that the group would only disarm if Israel fulfills prior commitments, including ceasing attacks, increasing the flow of aid, and withdrawing its forces. The new proposal builds on a ceasefire agreement from last year and envisions a phased transfer of authority to a U.S.-backed Palestinian administration under the principle of “one authority, one law, one weapon.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Today, the Board of Peace reached a HISTORIC agreement for the COMPLETE DISARMAMENT of Hamas and all other armed groups in Gaza. This is a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY. This agreement is a critical step towards Gaza finally being governed by a new Palestinian government that will work closely with the Board of Peace to help the Palestinian people. At the same time, Israel will have the security it deserves, with Gaza no longer used as a base for terror attacks.” – President Trump on Truth Social
🎯 IMPACT: If implemented, the plan could lead to the reconstruction of Gaza and establish a framework for regional stability. However, the disarmament of Hamas remains a contentious issue, with the group attaching significant conditions to any agreement, which the Israeli government may be reluctant to meet.
📺 FLASHBACK: The ceasefire agreement signed last October included demilitarization efforts, but talks have repeatedly stalled due to disagreements over conditions and the role of international mediators such as Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A U.S.-brokered plan to disarm Hamas in Gaza could pave the way for reconstruction and a new Palestinian government in the territory, though significant conditions remain unresolved.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Convicted Child Killer Axel Rudakubana Faces New Charges for Assaults on Prison Staff.

Axel Rudakubana, convicted of murdering three children in Southport, England, in 2024, has been charged with multiple assaults on prison staff.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Axel Rudakubana, serving a 52-year sentence for the 2024 murders of three young girls during a stabbing spree in Southport, England, has been charged with multiple assaults on prison staff during his time at His Majesty’s Prison (HMP) Belmarsh. The charges include assaulting emergency workers, attempted grievous bodily harm (GBH), and possession of an offensive weapon.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The alleged offenses occurred in May 2025, when he allegedly attacked a prison officer with boiling water, June 2025, and October 2025 at HMP Belmarsh. Rudakubana will appear via video link at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on September 11.
📺 DETAIL: Rudakubana, the son of two Rwandan asylum seekers, was convicted in 2024 for a brutal knife attack at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class, which left three young girls dead and injured ten others. Recently, he was transferred to Broadmoor, a high-security psychiatric hospital, following a clinical assessment under the Mental Health Act. His murders sparked protests across Britain, some centered on mosques and hotels hosting migrants, with the Labour government responding with a draconian crackdown that saw people imprisoned for as little as saying they would not care if the migrant hotels were burned down on social media.
🎯 IMPACT: The new charges demonstrate that Rudakubana has remained a threat despite his imprisonment. Advocates for the restoration of capital punishment have argued his ongoing violence strengthens the argument that he should have been executed for his murders, to ensure he is unable to harm anyone else.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Axel Rudakubana, convicted of murdering three children in Southport, England, in 2024, has been charged with multiple assaults on prison staff.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Advances New Hiring Rule to Eliminate DEI in Federal Government.

The Trump administration has taken steps to eliminate so-called race-conscious hiring practices in federal agencies, emphasizing merit-based employment standards.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has removed federal hiring guidelines that emphasized race-conscious hiring practices. 
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, the Trump administration removed a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) measure from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The OPM is the agency responsible for setting the federal government’s hiring policies. Specifically, the President removed the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, a set of guidelines first formulated in 1978 to encourage race-conscious hiring decisions. The guidelines had focused on “disparate impact,” the idea that certain hiring practices can produce insufficient representation for different racial groups. Critics argue that the guidelines ultimately lead to the prioritization of race over merit in federal hiring and promotion decisions. The Trump administration’s new rule removing the guidelines will be finalized 60 days after its issuance. This follows an opinion from the Department of Justice concluding that the guidelines were unconstitutional.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Federal hiring should be based on merit, qualifications, and the ability to perform the job… This rule ensures OPM’s regulations reflect legal guidance while preserving the rigorous, job-related standards that help agencies recruit and hire the most qualified workforce in service to the American people,” said OPM Director Scott Kupor.
🎯 IMPACT: This move is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI nationwide. Back in February, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the President’s executive order abolishing DEI in federal employment, contracting, and grant processes. Since then, it is clear that the administration feels sufficiently empowered to push forward with rolling back DEI measures. However, while advancements are being made at the federal level, there are efforts being made at the state level, specifically in Democrat-controlled states, to retain DEI measures, creating tension between federal and state government.
📺 FLASHBACK: In January 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order aimed at dismantling the “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) or ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) that can violate the civil-rights laws of this Nation.

Image by Tony Webster.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has taken steps to eliminate so-called race-conscious hiring practices in federal agencies, emphasizing merit-based employment standards.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. 30-Year Mortgage Rate Hits Yearly High of 6.66%.

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate has risen to 6.66 percent, adding financial strain on prospective homebuyers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  The average rate on a 30-year fixed U.S. mortgage has climbed for the fourth consecutive week, reaching its highest level in a year and adding another challenge for prospective homebuyers facing elevated borrowing costs. Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported Thursday that the benchmark rate increased to 6.66 percent from 6.58 percent last week, compared with 6.72 percent a year ago.
📺 DETAIL: The average rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage, commonly used for refinancing, also rose to 6.04 percent from 5.96 percent the previous week, up from 5.85 percent one year ago. Higher mortgage rates can add hundreds of dollars to monthly payments, reducing buyers’ purchasing power. Mortgage rates are influenced by factors including Federal Reserve policy, inflation expectations, and movements in the bond market, particularly the 10-year Treasury yield. Rates have generally trended higher this year as the Iran war has pushed crude oil prices higher, increasing concerns about inflation and driving long-term bond yields upward. The 10-year Treasury yield stood at 4.66 percent Thursday, up from 3.97 percent in late February before the conflict began.
🎯 IMPACT: Higher mortgage rates are adding substantially increasing monthly costs for borrowers, driving down purchasing power and discouraging prospective homebuyers. This trend has contributed to sluggish home sales in the U.S. as affordability challenges continue.

Image by respres.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate has risen to 6.66 percent, adding financial strain on prospective homebuyers.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Florida AG Initiates Investigation Into Fauci’s COVID-19 Actions.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, citing concerns over his conduct and transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) announced on Wednesday that his office is launching an investigation into former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci over his conduct during the COVID-19 pandemic. The announcement came after Fauci appeared before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, where he invoked his Fifth Amendment right and declined to answer lawmakers’ questions regarding the federal government’s pandemic response.
📺 DETAIL: Uthmeier criticized Fauci’s testimony in a social media post, saying his “lack of candor to Congress is unbelievable” and adding that it was “past time we get the truth of what happened during COVID.” During the hearing, Fauci said he was invoking his constitutional right against self-incrimination on the advice of his attorneys. Fauci declined to answer questions more than 100 times during the hearing. The investigation follows earlier comments by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R), who said Florida could examine whether Fauci’s actions violated any state laws after former President Joe Biden issued him a preemptive federal pardon before leaving office. DeSantis has described Biden’s pardon of Fauci as one of his “greatest abuses of power” and previously said Florida’s attorney general would review whether the state has jurisdiction to pursue any potential legal action.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “My office is launching an investigation into Dr. Fauci. It’s past time we get the truth of what happened during COVID.” – Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation could lead to Fauci facing legal consequences for his actions during the pandemic, as the blanket pardon he received from former President Joe Biden does not cover state crimes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, citing concerns over his conduct and transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mexican Illegal Charged With Kidnapping and Sexual Assault of Minor Teen in Public Park.

A Mexican illegal immigrant has been charged with kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Idaho.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Jose Alberto Lozano-Flores, a 29-year-old Mexican national, was arrested in Boise, Idaho, on charges of felony first-degree kidnapping, felony lewd conduct with a child under 16, and misdemeanor resisting and obstructing after allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl. The incident occurred around 9 PM on July 22 at Freedom Park in Star, where authorities say Lozano-Flores approached the unknown victim, sexually assaulted her, and drove off with her in his vehicle.
📺 DETAIL: He was taken into custody the next afternoon near Quinn’s Pond, where the minor was also recovered and reunited with her family. Lozano-Flores was booked into Ada County Jail, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has lodged a detainer to prevent his release. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), he unlawfully entered the United States through New Mexico in 2023, agreed to a voluntary return to Mexico after encountering Border Patrol, but later re-entered illegally again at an unknown time and place. Significantly, Idaho cooperates with federal immigration authorities and is not a sanctuary state.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “ICE will work with our partners in Idaho to ensure that he is not released from jail and is never loose in American communities again.” – DHS Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis
🎯 IMPACT: Lozano-Flores’s arrest underscores the ongoing threat to public safety posed by the huge number of illegal immigrants at large in the United States. It also highlights the importance of cooperation between local and federal authorities, with the Mexican being unlikely to be released by state authorities instead of handed over to ICE under sanctuary-style laws.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Mexican illegal immigrant has been charged with kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Idaho.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Activates Dormant ‘Alien Terrorist Removal Court’ to Deport ISIS Supporter.

The Trump administration has activated a long-dormant court to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting Islamic State and radicalizing her family, marking the first-ever Alien Terrorist Removal Court case since it was created in 1996.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has activated the Alien Terrorist Removal Court for the first time.
📺 DETAIL: The court has been activated as part of an effort to deport Nazira Haji Zada, an Afghan woman accused of supporting ISIS. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has alleged that Haji Zada supported Islamic State (ISIS), pledged allegiance to it, and indoctrinated her son and son-in-law into ISIS ideology. Her son and son-in-law have since been convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on Election Day 2024. According to federal law, the government is allowed to deport non-citizens who have engaged in or supported terrorist activities. Haji Zada has been a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. since 2018, although she does not have citizenship. The court was created under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, but has never heard a case. Importantly, the court can consider classified evidence while shielding sensitive intelligence in working towards its decision. “The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Congress created the Alien Terrorist Removal Court three decades ago to remove from the United States alien terrorists who never should have been here in the first place.” – Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
🎯 IMPACT: This is the first time that the court has been activated, having been dormant since its creation in 1996. The outcome of the case could determine whether the court becomes a regular device in deportation operations, particularly when dealing with foreign-born extremists who are permanent residents. The activation of the court means that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts must form a panel to assess Haji Zada’s case. Against the backdrop of author Salman Rushdie’s would-be assassin being found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and supporting Hezbollah in federal court, this move represents a broader pivot towards tackling Islamic terrorism on U.S. soil.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has activated a long-dormant court to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting Islamic State and radicalizing her family, marking the first-ever Alien Terrorist Removal Court case since it was created in 1996.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: One-Third of Democrats Now Identify as Socialists.

A new poll has revealed that a significant portion of Democrat and Democrat-leaning voters identify as democratic socialists, underscoring the ideological divide within the party ahead of the midterms.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Approximately one-third of Democrats and Democrat-leaning adults identify as democratic socialists, according to a CNN poll conducted by SSRS.
📺 DETAIL: The poll revealed that 59 percent of democratic socialists within the Democrat Party are under the age of 45. The poll also revealed that 57 percent of self-identified democratic socialists are white. Self-described democratic socialist Democrat voters are also less likely to hold college degrees or earn over $100,000 annually. Significantly, democratic socialists tend to be more energized about voting in the upcoming midterms. Whereas 57 percent of non-socialist Democrats were “extremely motivated to vote,” 66 percent of democratic socialists said the same. Roughly one-third of Democrat and Democrat-leaning adults identify as democratic socialists. They are more likely to view the Democrat Party favorably than non-socialist Democrats, with 68 percent having a positive view of the party. Democratic socialists are almost twice as likely to support the party moving to the left than non-socialist Democrats, 36 percent of whom would be unhappy with an explicitly socialist candidate.
🎯 IMPACT: This data demonstrates the rise of democratic socialism within the Democrat Party. The increasing prominence of socialist candidates and policies, especially ahead of a tight midterm election, may create problems for the party, particularly in competitive areas. Pursuing radical and often unpopular policies runs the risk of alienating moderate or conservative Democrat-leaning voters. The shift towards democratic socialism within the party indicates that a large portion of Democrats believe that the party’s failure in the 2024 Presidential election was the result of being insufficiently radical and left-wing, despite substantial evidence to the contrary, especially when it comes to social issues such as gender transitions for children.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI) encouraged her fellow Democrats to embrace the term “socialist.” Zohran Mamdani, the Ugandan immigrant who now serves as Mayor of New York City, is currently the most successful Democrat candidate in recent years to identify explicitly as a socialist. The CNN poll represents the continuation of a trend that has been accelerating for over a year. Back in 2025, it was reported that roughly one quarter of the Democrat Party views democratic socialist Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) as the “face” of the party.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed that a significant portion of Democrat and Democrat-leaning voters identify as democratic socialists, underscoring the ideological divide within the party ahead of the midterms.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pro-Life Christian Father Subjected to Armed Raid Under Biden Wins Major Settlement.

The Trump Justice Department has settled with a pro-life Christian whose home was raided by heavily armed FBI agents under Joe Biden.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has reached a seven-figure settlement with Tennessee pro-life advocate Paul Vaughn, whose home was raided by heavily armed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents in 2022 as part of the Biden-Harris regime’s enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act against pro-lifers. Vaughn, a Christian father of 11, had been charged over his participation in a 2021 protest outside an abortion clinic that included prayer and hymn singing, and he was later sentenced to six months of house arrest before receiving a presidential pardon from President Donald J. Trump in January 2025.
📺 DETAIL:  The settlement, announced by the Thomas More Society, resolves Vaughn’s lawsuit against the Justice Department and includes an acknowledgment that the department abused its authority during the prosecution. Recently released Justice Department emails revealed internal discussions about conducting arrests rather than allowing defendants to surrender voluntarily, with one official suggesting the FBI preferred making arrests. Vaughn said the experience strengthened his Christian faith. His lawyer, Steve Crampton, argued the case reflected a politically motivated prosecution and praised the Trump administration for addressing actions taken under the Biden-Harris regime. Crampton said additional settlements involving other pro-life activists could follow, and renewed calls for Congress to repeal the FACE Act, describing it as unconstitutional and vulnerable to political misuse. The House Judiciary Committee previously approved legislation to repeal the law, although the measure has not advanced further in Congress.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I think there’s no question that this was a politicized prosecution… meant purely to punish and deter pro-lifers from ever going back out again.” – Steve Crampton, Thomas More Society lawyer
🎯 IMPACT: Legal experts believe more settlements with pro-lifers could follow Vaughn’s. Meanwhile, calls for Congress to repeal the FACE Act are growing.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump Justice Department has settled with a pro-life Christian whose home was raided by heavily armed FBI agents under Joe Biden.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK PM Burnham Refuses to Commit to 3% Defense Spending Target.

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s reluctance to commit to a three percent of GDP defense spending target by 2030 has raised national security concerns.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has refused to commit to increasing defense spending to three percent of GDP by 2030.
📰 DETAIL: On Wednesday, Prime Minister Burnham failed to provide a commitment to increase defense spending to three percent of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) by 2030. Instead, Prime Minister Burnham pledged to increase Britain’s “core defense” budget to 3.5 percent of GDP by 2035—by which point he will be entering his late sixties and likely out of office. Core defense refers to fundamental military capabilities and readiness, such as conventional forces and hardware, nuclear weapons, and cybersecurity. “When it comes to defense obviously those commitments relate to the Parliament after this one in terms of our NATO commitments… I have been very clear that we will honor those commitments,” said the Prime Minister, before suggesting that reforms in other areas would ultimately allow for more spending on defense. “If we change those things then we will open up the way of meeting our commitments on defense,” he added. This follows growing criticism from defense experts that the former Mayor of Greater Manchester lacks a clear national defense strategy and has not given any indication that he will allocate a sufficient amount of funding towards protecting the United Kingdom.
🎯 IMPACT: The Prime Minister’s lack of commitment to the 2030 target has raised concerns about Britain’s military readiness, which is currently poor. Critics have characterized the Prime Minister’s non-committal answer as sending a message of weakness to Britain’s adversaries. This creates a particular problem for Prime Minister Burnham, as he appointed John Healey as his Chancellor, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Healey is a vocal advocate of the 2030 defense target, and resigned as Secretary of Defence under Burnham’s predecessor, former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, just weeks ago, after Starmer failed to meet the spending target. Moreover, if Burnham fails to meet the three percent target and Healey does not resign or apply some kind of public pressure, Healey’s credibility will be damaged as well. This coincides with the start of the Pentagon’s review of the United States’ military footprint in Europe, which was triggered in response to European NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries repeatedly failing to meet their defense spending targets, inviting accusations of “freeriding” on U.S. protection.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The bottom line is Burnham hasn’t made the transition from being a mayor of a big city to the prime minister of a large country of 70 million people… the number one priority is the defense of the country.” – Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham's reluctance to commit to a three percent of GDP defense spending target by 2030 has raised national security concerns.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.