New Jersey Governor Chris Christie said that the Supreme Court ruling on marriage would not have happened if “Christie-type” judges had been appointed. During an interview with Fox News Sunday, Christie said the deal he made with the Democrat-led legislature to re-appoint the
Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent in Obergefell (imposing same-sex marriage in all 50 states) was hardly less blistering than the infamously sharp-tongued Justice Scalia. Here are his top 15 critiques for Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the majority uncovering a new right
Prof. Andrew Koppelman of Northwestern University Law school has long supported gay marriage—I debated him back in 2004 in a University of St. Thomas Law School symposium. He even believes the Constitution contains a right to same-sex marriage. But even he could not
On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to redefine marriage across the nation to include same-sex unions. Justice Antonin Scalia was one of the dissenting justices. Here are the top five zingers from his blistering dissent: 5. “Today’s decree says that my
We need Supreme Court justices with better vocabularies. After all, a majority of the Roberts Court couldn’t even define tax, state, or marriage. Frank Cannon is the president of American Principles in Action.
From National Review: Here is what I think the man or woman who wants to be president cannot say: any version of “the Court has ruled, it’s time to move on.” Here is what I want to hear: “Today the Supreme Court
We’re getting close to the end of a Supreme Court term, and with the end of their term comes controversial rulings bound to make someone angry. You may ask: “was it always this way.” The answer, of course, is yes. Here are
Rick Perry is telling RealClearPolitics (no MSM source) he is downplaying “religious” issues this election cycle, unlike the last one, to focus his attention elsewhere, explaining why religion never came up in his Faith and Freedom speech last week. (Hat tip: Newsmax). Perry
