The View‘s Sunny Hostin, known for outlandish and often absurd political statements, is now likening the January 6, 2021, Capitol riots to the Holocaust. Speaking on the ABC mid-day talk show, Hostin lamented that most Americans appear to have moved on from the unrest that occurred four years ago in Washington, D.C.
“I think we need to find moral clarity, you know, in this country,” Hostin said as co-host Whoopi Goldberg looked on. “I just remember after January 6, you had someone like Mitch McConnell placing the blame on January 6 where it belongs—squarely on Donald Trump’s shoulders. And then you started seeing people backtrack that and losing their moral center. You had Condoleezza Rice, I believe—on this very show—saying, ‘You know we need to move on from January 6.'”
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
“I say no. You don’t move on. Because January 6 was an atrocity. It was one of the worst moments in American history. And when you think about the worst moments in American history, you know, like World War Two—things that happened—like the Holocaust, chattel slavery, we need to never forget. Because past becomes prologue if you forget any race.”
While the far-left host of The View insists the Capitol riots stand in moral equivalence to some of the darkest moments in modern history, the scale does not appear to be comparable. Four total individuals died during the riots—all were protestors, including Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed at point-blank range by Capitol Police Officer Lt. Michael Byrd while trying to climb through a window near the House Chamber, unarmed.
Meanwhile, the Holocaust saw Nazi Germany exterminate over six million Jews on an industrial scale, and the American practice of chattel slavery saw just over 10 million mostly African-heritage individuals held in bondage in the United States.
WATCH:
Sunny Hostin compares January 6th to the Holocaust.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Cuba’s border guard engaged in a shootout with a U.S.-registered fishing boat, leaving four dead and six wounded. The incident is under investigation by both Cuban and U.S. authorities.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Cuban border guard forces, the U.S.-registered fishing boat’s occupants, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President J.D. Vance.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on Wednesday in Cuban territorial waters. Rubio addressed the matter while in Saint Kitts and Nevis.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Suffice it to say, it is highly unusual to see shootouts in the open sea like that. It’s not something that happens every day.” – Marco Rubio
🎯IMPACT: The U.S. is evaluating the facts before responding, while Cuba claims the fishing boat aimed to carry out terrorist activities.
IN FULL
Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed an alleged shootout between Cuba’s border guard and a U.S.-registered fishing boat, calling the situation “highly unusual.” President Donald J. Trump’s Secretary of State emphasized the need for the U.S. to evaluate the facts before issuing a response. Speaking from Saint Kitts and Nevis on Wednesday, Rubio stated, “We’re not going to base our conclusions on what they’ve told us. And I’m very, very confident that we will know the full story of what happened here, and we will know it soon.”
“Suffice it to say, it is highly unusual to see shootouts in the open sea like that. It’s not something that happens every day,” Rubio added.
The National Pulse reported on Wednesday that Cuba’s Interior Ministry stated its border guard shot four dead and wounded six others aboard the 1981 Pro-Line 24-foot center-console fishing boat. The ministry claimed the boat carried ten armed individuals intending to conduct an infiltration for terrorist purposes. Among the deceased was Michel Ortega Casanova, while seven others have been identified, including Amijail Sánchez González and Leordan Enrique Cruz Gómez. The ministry also alleged that those aboard had a history of criminal activity and were Cuban nationals residing in the U.S.
Rubio refused to speculate on potential consequences for Cuba, stating that more analysis was required. Vice President J.D. Vance, who was briefed on the matter by Rubio, echoed the sentiment, saying, “Hopefully it’s not as bad as we fear it could be, but I can’t say more because I just don’t know more.”
Cuba’s Interior Ministry claimed that weapons, bulletproof vests, and camouflage uniforms were found aboard the vessel. The Cuban Embassy in the U.S. alleged that the fishing boat crew fired on Cuban personnel, injuring their commander. “Cuba reaffirms its determination to protect its territorial waters,” the embassy stated.
The vessel, registered in Florida, was reported stolen by its Miami-based owner, who is not considered a suspect.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has filed a request with the U.S. Supreme Court to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrian nationals.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump’s administration, the U.S. Supreme Court, and lower courts across the country.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 26, 2026, in Washington, D.C.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This application marks the third time that the government has been compelled to seek a stay from this Court after lower Courts have baselessly blocked the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determinations regarding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) just before they took effect.” — Trump administration filing
🎯IMPACT: The administration argues that lower courts have overstepped their authority, delaying the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) decisions.
IN FULL
The Trump administration is once again having to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to end lower court lawfare efforts hampering executive branch powers to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for certain groups of foreign nationals. In filings made on Thursday, the administration is seeking to appeal a lower court’s stay on ending TPS for Syrians. By removing the stay ruling, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be cleared to begin facilitating the return of Syrian nationals temporarily allowed to reside in the U.S. to their home country.
“This application marks the third time that the government has been compelled to seek a stay from this Court after lower Courts have baselessly blocked the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determinations regarding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) just before they took effect,” the Trump administration states in its filing with the Supreme Court. “The lower courts’ arrogation of core Executive Branch prerogatives irreparably harms the government, and respondents’ alleged harms were inherent in the temporary nature of the program that Congress designed.”
The National Pulse reported last May that the Trump administration was forced to go to the Supreme Court to end a lower court’s block on ending TPS for Venezuelan nationals. In August of last year, U.S. District Court Judge Trina L. Thompson ruled against the administration’s decision to terminate TPS designations for approximately 60,000 immigrants from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. The judge alleged that the administration’s decision was influenced by discriminatory beliefs, including the notion that non-white immigrant groups could replace white Americans.
Subsequently, the Trump administration’s decision to end TPS for Haitian nationals was blocked by U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes, appointed by former President Joe Biden, earlier this month. Judge Reyes, a Harvard-educated Uruguayan immigrant, admitted that the TPS statute limits judicial review of the substantive decisions on country designations, but argued she could intervene regardless to examine whether the administrative process followed proper procedures.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A parliamentary by-election (special election) in England on Thursday will be subject to voter ID requirements.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The British government, the Electoral Commission, and voters in Britain.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Voter ID requirements were introduced by the Elections Act 2022, affecting today’s Gorton and Denton by-election in Manchester, England.
💬KEY QUOTE: “At least 50,000 voters were initially turned away at polling stations [during the] 2024 general election, with 34,000 returning. This meant 16,000 did not return.” – House of Commons Library research briefing
🎯IMPACT: Britain’s in-person voting is more secure than America’s although Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s governing Labour Party is moving to weaken existing safeguards, and postal (mail-in) voting on-demand remains highly vulnerable.
IN FULL
Voters in the Gorton and Denton constituency (electoral district) in Greater Manchester, England, are heading to the polls for a by-election (special election) to choose a new Member of Parliament (MP), in what is expected to be a tight contest between Matt Goodwin, representing Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, and far-left candidates for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s ruling Labour Party and the Greens. Unlike in the United States, voters will be required to present a valid ID.
The Elections Act 2022 made photo ID compulsory for in-person voting in British Parliament elections and in English and Northern Irish local and regional elections, although Northern Ireland had required photo ID for much longer, with basic ID checks starting in 1985 and photo ID specifically mandated since 2003 to address concerns about electoral fraud. Elections to the Scottish Parliament or the Senedd (Welsh Parliament)—roughly equivalent to U.S. state legislatures—do not have voter ID requirements, nor do most of those countries’ local elections, which are subject to weaker regional regulations set by leftist regional governments.
Acceptable forms of photo ID are broad, including passports, driving licences, and bus passes. The document must be original (not a photocopy or photo on a phone), but it can be expired as long as the photo still resembles the voter reasonably well. For those without a suitable ID, the government provides a free Voter Authority Certificate (VAC), which serves as an alternative form of photo ID. Applications can be made online or through local electoral offices.
Implementation has generally been smooth administratively, with low numbers of people ultimately unable to vote. According to a House of Commons Library research briefing, “At least 50,000 voters were initially turned away at polling stations [during the] 2024 general election, with 34,000 returning. This meant 16,000 did not return.” This suggests the regulations have thwarted some fraudulent voters.
The rules were introduced by the formerly governing Conservative (Tory) Party, with the incumbent Labour Party opposed to them. Labour, under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, now says it will not abolish the ID requirements, but does plan to expand the list of acceptable IDs in the future, potentially including bank cards, which the Electoral Commission has flagged as a safety risk.
As in the United States, mail-in or postal voting on demand remains a significant vulnerability, with historic cases of fraud on an “industrial scale” in Labour-voting Muslim communities. Judge Richard Mawrey QC, sitting as an election commissioner in one case, found that the postal voting system was “wide open to fraud and any would-be political fraudster knows that it’s wide open to fraud,” and would “disgrace a banana republic.”
Notably, Mawrey warned ahead of the 2020 elections in the United States that American mail-in voting has even fewer safeguards than British postal voting and could “easily” be rigged.
There’s a special (by) election in the UK today and guess what?
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The social security numbers of at least 26 million Americans were exposed in a majordata breach involving Conduent, a company managing data for corporations, healthcare providers, and state agencies.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Conduent, an unauthorized third party, and impacted Americans across multiple states, including Texas, Oregon, Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The breach occurred between October 21, 2024, and January 13, 2025, affecting individuals nationwide.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If any insurance giant cut corners or has information that could help us prevent breaches like this in the future, I will work to uncover it. My office is committed to uncovering exactly what went wrong, taking action to protect Texas families, and ensuring there is justice for any negligence.” – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
🎯IMPACT: The breach exposed sensitive personal information, including social security numbers and health records, with long-term risks for affected individuals.
IN FULL
The personal data of at least 26 million Americans has been exposed in what has been described as the largest data breach in U.S. history. Conduent, a company that handles sensitive information for corporations, healthcare providers, and state agencies, confirmed that an unauthorized third party accessed its systems between October 21, 2024, and January 13, 2025.
Over 15 million residents in Texas were affected, along with more than 10 million individuals in Oregon and hundreds of thousands in other states, including Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Notifications sent to those affected revealed that compromised data may have included names, Social Security numbers, medical information, and health insurance details. Conduent clarified that not all data elements were present for every individual.
While the breach was discovered on January 13, 2025, Conduent stated that it is unaware of any misuse of the stolen information at this time. Affected individuals have been notified, and a dedicated phone line has been set up to address questions and concerns at (855) 291-2605. The company emphasized that its network was secured, law enforcement was notified, and operations were safely restored following the incident.
Safepay, a ransomware group, has claimed responsibility for the attack, reportedly obtaining over eight terabytes of data. While it remains unclear if a ransom has been demanded, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) stated, “If any insurance giant cut corners or has information that could help us prevent breaches like this in the future, I will work to uncover it. My office is committed to uncovering exactly what went wrong, taking action to protect Texas families, and ensuring there is justice for any negligence.”
Experts warn that the long-term impact of this breach could be severe, as social security numbers and health records cannot be easily changed like credit card details. Affected individuals are advised to place credit freezes with major bureaus such as Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, request fraud alerts on their credit files, and monitor bank statements and credit reports for suspicious activity.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under former President Joe Biden subpoenaed the phone records of now-FBI Director Kash Patel and now-White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles during the Arctic Frost investigation into President Donald J. Trump and his allies.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kash Patel, Susie Wiles, Joe Biden’s FBI leadership, and special counsel Jack Smith.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Subpoenas were issued in 2022 and 2023 during the Biden government.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is outrageous and deeply alarming that the previous FBI leadership secretly subpoenaed my own phone records—along with those of now-White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.” – Kash Patel
🎯IMPACT: At least ten FBI employees were dismissed, and the FBI ended the ability to categorize certain files as “prohibited.”
IN FULL
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as part of the former Biden government’s Arctic Frost investigation of President Donald J. Trump, subpoenaed the phone records of now-FBI Director Kash Patel and now-White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in 2022 and 2023, when both were private citizens. Concerningly, it also appears that the FBI recorded conversations between Wiles and her attorney. While the latter granted the bureau permission to do so, Florida is a two-party consent state, raising concerns that the FBI may have illegally obtained the recordings.
Notably, the FBI’s subpoenas and recording activities occurred as the Biden Department of Justice’s (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith had taken over the Arctic Frost investigation into President Donald Trump and the Capitol riots on January 6. The National Pulse has previously reported that Smith is accused of abusing his power as special counsel to cast a wide net of subpoenas, including for phone toll records belonging to members of Congress. Subsequently, Smith used friendly judges like James Boasberg and Beryl Howell to attain orders preventing phone carriers from notifying the lawmakers that their records had been subpoenaed.
Even more troubling, it appears the Biden government attempted to hide the phone record files it possessed for Patel and Wiles, with the documents being found in files labeled “prohibited.” After the discovery, Director Patel has moved to fire ten current FBI employees involved in the subpoenas and has ended the bureau’s ability to categorize certain files as “prohibited.”
Patel called the discovery of the subpoenas and recording of Wiles’s meeting with her attorney “outrageous and deeply alarming.” He added, “It is outrageous and deeply alarming that the previous FBI leadership secretly subpoenaed my own phone records—along with those of now White House chief of staff Susie Wiles—using flimsy pretexts and burying the entire process in prohibited case files designed to evade all oversight.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The president and chief executive of the World Economic Forum (WEF), Børge Brende, announced his resignation following scrutiny over past interactions with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Børge Brende, the WEF co-chairs Andre Hoffmann and Larry Fink, and Jeffrey Epstein.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Brende announced his decision after more than eight years in his role, following an independent review of his meetings with Epstein in 2018 and 2019.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I believe now is the right moment for the forum to continue its important work without distractions.” – Børge Brende
🎯IMPACT: The resignation impacts the World Economic Forum’s already contentious reputation and future operations.
IN FULL
Børge Brende, president and chief executive of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF), announced his resignation on Thursday amid scrutiny of his previous contacts with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Brende acknowledged having dined with Epstein on three occasions during 2018 and 2019, long after his 2008 conviction as a child sex offender, but claimed he was unaware of Epstein’s highly-publicized criminal background at the time.
Recent disclosures by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) also showed communications, including emails and text messages, between the two men. The WEF subsequently initiated a supposedly independent external review, which insisted there were “no additional concerns beyond what has been previously disclosed.”
“After careful consideration, I have decided to step down as president and chief executive of the World Economic Forum. I am grateful for the incredible collaboration with my colleagues, partners, and constituents, and I believe now is the right moment for the forum to continue its important work without distractions,” Brende said in his resignation statement.
WEF co-chairs André Hoffmann and Larry Fink released a joint statement commending Brende’s tenure, noting, “His dedication and leadership have been instrumental during a pivotal period of reforms for the organisation, leading to a successful annual meeting in Davos. We respect his decision to step down.”
Brende is one of several European leaders who have been caught in the fallout from the latest Epstein disclosures. Former British ambassador to the U.S. and Cabinet member Peter Mandelson has been arrested for misconduct in public office, as has the now-former Prince Andrew, related to them allegedly passing confidential information to the pedophile financier. Meanwhile, former Norwegian Prime Minister, head of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, and Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland has attempted suicide amid corruption charges for his Epstein links.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Russian proxy Belarus is reportedly using underground tunnels to send migrants into the European Union (EU) as part of a hybrid warfare strategy.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Russia, Belarus, Polish officials, Bulgarian Interior Minister Daniel Mitov, and British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The tactic has been ongoing since at least 2021, targeting Poland’s eastern border and other NATO states.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Illegal migration inflows are an instrument for hostile regimes to destabilize the European Union and the United Kingdom.” – Daniel Mitov
🎯IMPACT: The strategy aims to destabilize European welfare systems, increase social tensions, and divide NATO allies.
IN FULL
The Polish government is accusing Russia, through its proxy Belarus, of constructing and utilizing a network of underground tunnels under the Belarusian border to flood Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia with migrants from Africa, the Middle East, and Central and South Asia as part of a hybrid warfare strategy against Europe. The Polish officials contend that experts from the Middle East with “a high level of expertise” have been involved in designing and digging these tunnels—insinuating that Russia and Belarus may be employing current or former members of Hamas who oversaw the construction of the Islamist terror group’s tunnel network under Gaza.
The tactic forms part of Belarus’ ongoing efforts to channel tens of thousands of migrants toward Poland’s eastern frontier. Belarusian security forces have been accused of escorting migrants to the Polish border while blocking their retreat, a practice referred to as “instrumentalized migration.” Since 2021, Belarus has relaxed entry rules for migrants from the Middle East and Africa, encouraging them to move toward NATO borders after they arrive.
Bulgarian Interior Minister Daniel Mitov stated that Russian security services are also aiding migrants in entering Britain and other European countries illegally. “They are aiming to destabilize the welfare systems, plus, of course, through smuggling radicalized individuals, they create security issues for us,” Mitov contends, while alleging that some European non-governmental organizations (NGOs) aid these operations, knowingly or not.
The United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary, Yvette Cooper, echoed these concerns, saying, “It is clear that illegal migration into Europe and beyond is being driven not just by organized crime networks seeking to make a profit, but by hostile state actors seeking to destabilize Europe.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has temporarily halted certain Medicaid funding to Minnesota to address fraud concerns.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED:Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, and Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Wednesday, February 25, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re announcing today that we have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that are going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligations seriously to be good stewards of the American people’s tax money.” — Vice President Vance
🎯IMPACT: The decision aims to address fraud and ensure accountability in the use of taxpayer funds.
IN FULL
The Trump administration is moving to temporarily halt certain Medicaid funding to Minnesota amid ongoing investigations into widespread social services fraud linked to the state’s Somali immigrant community. Vice President J.D. Vance—along with Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS)—announced the funding suspension on Wednesday after President Donald J. Trump announced that Vance would oversee his administration’s anti-fraud efforts during the State of the Union address Tuesday evening.
“We’re announcing today that we have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that are going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligations seriously to be good stewards of the American people’s tax money,” Vance said. During Tuesday’s State of the Union address, President Trump declared a “war on fraud,” accusing some Minnesota Somalians of having “pillaged” billions in U.S. taxpayer dollars.
🚨 @VP: “We have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that are going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligation seriously to be good stewards of the American people’s tax money.” pic.twitter.com/XD0JMA5p3w
Meanwhile, Dr. Oz detailed some of the social fraud schemes uncovered by CMS investigators, stating, “There is a fraud scheme in Minnesota where criminals—soon to be criminals—pay moms $1,000, roughly, in order to enroll their children as being autistic, falsely and dishonestly claiming their children are autistic. They then bill Medicaid—this has already happened—millions of dollars for services that were never rendered.”
🚨 BREAKING: Dr. Oz and JD Vance just confirmed “immigrant” AUTISM FRAUD is RAMPANT in Minnesota, and now the Trump admin is withholding a QUARTER BILLION in payments to the state
“There are schemes in Minnesota where criminals pay moms $1,000 in order to enroll their children… pic.twitter.com/7sy2euLxef
The National Pulse previously reported in January that the Trump administration revealed it had suspended nearly 7,000 borrowers from Small Business Administration (SBA) loan programs in Minnesota over suspected fraud involving pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) funds. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed last December that 85 members of the Minnesota Somali community have been charged as part of the ongoing and far-reaching social services fraud probe.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has initiated a public inquiry into the shift of sports broadcasting rights from free, over-the-air platforms to subscription-based streaming services.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, broadcast networks, and internet streaming services.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The FCC’s comment period runs through March 27, 2026, with reply comments due by April 13, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “For decades, Americans enjoyed turning on their TV & quickly finding the game they wanted to see. Yet watching your favorite team play isn’t as easy these days.” — Brendan Carr.
🎯IMPACT: The inquiry seeks to address concerns over consumer costs, market fragmentation, and public interest obligations of broadcasters.
IN FULL
The Trump administration’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced a public inquiry into the growing trend of sports broadcasting rights shifting from free, over-the-air platforms to subscription-based streaming services. This development has raised concerns among a number of lawmakers on Capitol Hill and President Donald J. Trump, particularly regarding accessibility and affordability for consumers.
According to the FCC, while streaming platforms have expanded access to sports, they have also contributed to market fragmentation. Notably, in 2025, National Football League (NFL) games were broadcast across 10 different services, potentially costing consumers over $1,500 to access all games, according to some estimates.
The bureau further noted that 20 NFL regular-season games and one playoff game were exclusively distributed on four streaming platforms—Amazon Prime Video, YouTube, Peacock, and Netflix. This exclusivity has raised questions about broadcasters’ ability to fulfill their public-interest obligations.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), FCC Chairman Brendan Carr stated, “For decades, Americans enjoyed turning on their TV & quickly finding the game they wanted to see. Yet watching your favorite team play isn’t as easy these days. Many games are still on broadcast, but an increasing number are on a range of different online platforms.”
Carr continued, “We want to understand the marketplace today, the experience of consumers, and how the changes impact the ability of broadcast TV stations to continue delivering local news, information, and other programming.” The comment period is open until March 27, 2026, with reply comments due by April 13, 2026.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The House Judiciary Committee is requesting a briefing from the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the circumstances surrounding the ouster of Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, who oversaw the agency’s Antitrust Division.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The House Judiciary Committee, Gail Slater, Republican influencer Mike Davis, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, former DOJ staffers Roger Alford and Bill Rinner, along with Compass, Hewlett-Packard (HP), and Live Nation.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Slater left the DOJ on February 19, 2026, and the House Judiciary requested a briefing on the matter on Wednesday, February 25.
💬KEY QUOTE: “With the departure of AAG Slater, it appears there are no longer any principled antitrust experts left to guard the antitrust division from this cascade of corruption.” — House Judiciary letter
🎯IMPACT: Slater’s abrupt resignation is steeped in allegations that Republican influencer Mike Davis—founder of the Article III Project (A3P) and the MRDLaw legal services firm—worked to undermine the DOJ antitrust chief’s standing with Attorney General Pam Bondi to the benefit of corporate clients he reportedly represents.
IN FULL
The House Judiciary Committee has opened an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the ouster of Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, who oversaw the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division until last week. Slater’s abrupt departure is steeped in allegations that Republican influencer Mike Davis—founder of the Article III Project (A3P) and the MRDLaw legal services firm—worked to undermine the DOJ antitrust chief’s standing with Attorney General Pam Bondi to the benefit of corporate clients he reportedly represents.
Slater, who came highly recommended after working in Vice President J.D. Vance’s old Senate office, is believed to have refused to roll over so that Republican influencers could make large amounts of cash lobbying for corporate America.
Numerous sources close to the DOJ’s Antitrust Division and lobbying operations in Washington, D.C., who spoke with The National Pulse, claim Davis oversaw a public relations campaign targeting Slater on behalf of alleged clients, including Compass, Hewlett-Packard (HP), and Live Nation. Multiple individuals pointed to a heated meeting last July after the firing of two of Slater’s lieutenants, Roger Alford and Bill Rinner, during which White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles admonished Bondi and her deputy, Todd Blanche, over Davis’s DOJ access and his role in instigating infighting within the department.
“With the departure of AAG Slater, it appears there are no longer any principled antitrust experts left to guard the antitrust division from this cascade of corruption,” the House Judiciary letter, sent to Attorney General Bondi on Wednesday, states. It adds, “The leadership vacuum is occurring just as the antitrust division is handling historic cases.”
The inquiry is likely to focus on Davis and his efforts to influence the DOJ, especially the Antitrust Division. Following Slater’s resignation, Davis took to social media, taking credit for her ouster—writing in one post, “Good riddance.”
In private messages reviewed by The National Pulse, Davis wrote, “I’ve done more than anyone here on the big tech antitrust fight. Gail was a disaster. I recommended her hiring. And her firing.” When The National Pulse reached out to Davis for comment following Slater’s ouster, he abruptly responded, “Go fuck yourself,” despite rising to fame on the back of Stephen K. Bannon’s War Room show, which was co-founded by The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief, Raheem J. Kassam.
Sources have suggested that Davis played a key role in pushing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to drop a case against Pepsi and Walmart involving allegations of price fixing. Davis is facing scrutiny over HP’s $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks as well, with U.S. District Court Judge Casey Pitts conducting a Tunney Act review of the case’s unusual settlement.
“What if I told you this was happening because greedy, fake-MAGA world grifters and lobbyists are upset that the antitrust team was actually doing their job instead of taking cash from big corporates to turn a blind eye to monopolistic practices?” The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam warned in a post on X (formerly Twitter) last July.
What if I told you this was happening because greedy, fake-MAGA world grifters and lobbyists are upset that the antitrust team was actually doing their job instead of taking cash from big corporates to turn a blind eye to monopolistic practices? 👀 https://t.co/UL9ymj0bVu
Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
