Tuesday, December 9, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

READ: Biden Indulged in 10 Minute Rant About Country Clubs and Burnt Penises During Special Counsel Testimony.

President Joe Biden delivered a long and rambling response when pressed by Department of Justice special counsel Robert Hur regarding document retention during the final days of the Obama government. The 81-year-old Biden, ignoring Hur’s question, went on a nearly 10-minute rant discussing country clubs, interview practices of almost 60 years ago, and how a man he knew lost his genitals in a fire.

Hur asked Biden: “So now let’s talk about the Naval Observatory. So you’ve been living there for eight years. So at the end of your vice presidency, what kinds of papers or documents or files were at the Naval Observatory as you were preparing to leave and move out?”

The President began to respond substantively but quickly spiraled into a bizarre and unhinged tangent comparable to the iconic Simpsons scene where Homer Simpson’s father indulges himself in a winding story that ends up nowhere.

Read it for yourself:

PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, if you’re talking about anything that was a substantive matter, classified or otherwise — you know, the fight in the Judiciary Committee over whether or not — I was the guy who wrote the Violence Against Women Act. It was — really meant a lot to me. And so they might find stuff on the Violence Against Women Act in one section of a drawer or in the shelves of the library or of the Naval Observatory.

Or issues, you know, relating to — I know it’s gonna sound strange to you guys, but agriculture is a $4 billion industry, agriculture is a $4 billion industry in Delaware and the Delmarva peninsula, and so — or, you know, I’d have a lot of political things that — I, I don’t know where they were, but I know I had material that — where I, you know — like, there’s a whole, whole bunch of stuff around about how -~ what made me run for President in the first place, and about how things were — you know, I mean, for example, I, I was a — I got a job with a — I didn’t take law school very seriously, but I won the International Tort Competition. I was in — matter of fact, the first time in tort class, we had a really difficult professor. I mean, very well-known, Professor at Syracuse, and he called on me to — you know how they do in law school, discuss a case, you know, in your first torts class. And I had never read the case, and I stood up and I spoke for 10 minutes. The whole class stood up, started clapping.

The transcript notes there was laughter among those in the interview at this point.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And he said, Mr. Biden, you’ll be a hell of a trial lawyer. He said, not a single thing you — had to do with that.

Again, the transcript denotes laughter.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And — but at any rate, so — but in law school, I got in law school, and I got, believe it or not, a job offer from some prestigious law firms. I was not sure where I wanted to go, out west and where — I wanted to move to Idaho, I thought, and so I was going to go out and interview with Boise Cascade. That’s all I’d really — and — but I took a job with the best-known trial firm in Delaware in mostly civil defense issues. And, and so — and I remember a guy named [REDACTED] (phonetic), a brilliant guy that went to Amherst and Harvard and said — when he was interviewing me said, in those days, you had to — today you would be killed. You had to put your photograph in the upper right-hand corner when you’re applying for a job. And he looked at me and said, I assume you’re expecting to be hired on your looks.

Once again, the transcript denotes laughter.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I said — and I thought the job was over, and I said, I said, well, it would improve the look of your firm.

Those present respond with laughter again, according to the transcript.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: I mean, I was just — So anyway, to make a long story short, they ended up offering me a job. And in Delaware, it has -~- used to have the lowest pass rate in the country because we’re not big on encouraging lawyers to come and play in Delaware. It’s a very tight bar. And, and so what happened was you take the bar, you graduate, and you have to clerk for somebody for six months. (Indiscernible 0:11:51.6). And they don’t give the bar exam until the middle of September. You don’t get your results to your — for the bar exam until January. And, and so — I — but I got hired in the meantime by this firm appropriately named Prickett, Ward, Burt Sanders. And, and to make a long story not quite so long, I was sitting second chair with the, with the, with the guy who ran the firm, Prickett, Mr. Prickett, and there was a young man who we were representing, [REDACTED] (phonetic) getting — and (indiscernible 0:12:34.3) construction company, you know, I had to turn those — we have more oil refineries than any place other than in Houston in Delaware and Pennsylvania, (indiscernible 0:12:43.6) up in that area.

And this poor kid is down a hundred-foot vessel, chimney, scraping the hydrogen bubbles off of the inside. They were made to shut the plant down once every — whatever, about eight months or six months or a year, whatever it is. And he was wearing the wrong pants, wrong jeans, and he -~- a spark caught fire and got caught in the containment vessel and he lost part of his penis and one of his testicles and he was 23 years old.

And I sat through the -~ his presentation with the, with the senior, and we had in Delaware, which is – the Dupont family had no influence of course – contributory negligence. If you were slightly contributory negligence, you were out.

And so the senior partner turned to me and said, write a memo for tomorrow, we’re going to make a motion to dismiss after presenting this case. So I did. I wrote this memo. And son of a bitch, it prevailed. And I looked over at that kid and his wife home with two little kids, and I thought son of a bitch, I’m in the wrong business, I’m not made for this.

It is at this point that Biden transitions to discussing the admission practices of private country clubs in Delaware, before explaining his decision to become a public defender.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I — there was a famous club called the Wilmington Club — no blacks, Catholics are allowed — have been allowed to be members. The DuPont family name. And we went to a place called the Wilmington Club, and he thought he was doing — he said, take the lunch at Wilmington. I said — the only time I ever lied that I can remember looking somebody in the eye, and I mean sincerely, I said, oh, my dad’s coming in today, I was going to see -~ okay. He didn’t give a damn where I went. I walked across and walked through to the second — the basement on a public building and walked in with a guy named Frank and I said I want a job as a public defender. He said, don’t you work for Prickett. He said, he said, are you okay, like what the hell’s the matter with you. I quit and became a public defender.

The process of that was that’s what got me — I had been involved in the civil rights movement. That got me deeply involved in trying to reform the Democratic Party, which was a southern Democratic Party. We were a slave state by law. We were one of the border states so we couldn’t figure — anyway, but the Democratic Party was a conservative party in Delaware. The DuPont family ran the Republican Party, but they were like Rockefeller Republicans at the time. And so I got involved with a group of people trying to reform the Democratic Party.

At this point Biden informed Hur his story was meant to illustrate the amount of materials he has kept over the years.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And the whole point of telling you all this is I had a lot of material that I kept notes on and, and when that — where as I was taking on the Democratic Party. And they came to me and asked me to — this group, this new Democratic coalition — I had, in the meantime, it’s two years down the road, I was 26 years old, 27. And I went to work part time for a criminal defense firm mainly, a real estate — there were five people. And so I was no longer a public defender because I couldn’t be a public defender and work for that firm.

President Biden’s moment of clarity does not last however, and he again plunges into a lengthy rant — several times to “make a long story short.”

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And one thing led to another and I joined this group to try to reform the party. And they came to me about and I was making the case we’ve just got to get more candidates to run, to — we’re not, we’re not represented. And the southern part of the state of Delaware will talk at you like this, for real, you go down — you think I’m joking, I’m not joking. “Damn, boy, I don’t agree with a damn thing you say,” but he said, “I know where you stand, know where you stand.” That’s how they talk. And it was solidly democrat, southern democrat. We were the only state in the nation occupied by the military for 10 months with drawn bayonets at every corner when Dr. King was assassinated, and that’s really what got me going. Long story, and I’ll end, because it relates to maybe some of the other things you may ask about, is that I had a lot of material that I did recent. When you’re the youngest guy in the room, you get to turn the lights on and off. And so I, I amassed a lot of material making the case why the party had to change and, and they — and it ended up that about 10 months in, the group from the area where I lived came to me and said they wanted me to run for the state senate. I said, no, no, no, I can’t do that. I just — I’m thinking of starting my own law firm and it’s going to — no, I can’t do that. And because they meet in Dover and dah, dah, dah.

And then next thing that happened was I came back about three weeks later. They said we want — to the office I was in at the time. I had now started my own office. And I didn’t realize no one my age ever started his own law firm. I hired two lawyers. I had no freaking money. But I hired them and paid them more than I was going to make, and I started this firm. And there — I remember standing looking out over the public and they said how about running for the county council. I said, no, no, I can’t go down. He said, they meet right across the street there only twice a week at night. You can do this. So to make a long story short, I ended up doing it. But I wanted to be sure that I was going to lose because — so I ran ina district that no one’s ever won, a Democrat had never won.

And I won it.

And next thing you know, I’m in a tough position.

My generic point was there was a lot of material that I had amassed that I wanted to save. I probably still have it somewhere. And so that stuff would travel wherever the hell

I was —

Hur, at this point, finally interrupts Biden. The special counsel steered the conversation back to the relevant question of document retention.

“Do you recall having these types of things with you at the Naval Observatory and this was part of the stuff you were trying to move out?” Hur asked the President.

“No. I had most of it at my house in that office,” Biden finally answered.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

China Admits Trump Tariffs Severely Damaged Its Economy.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Chinese Premier Li Qiang criticized tariffs, including those imposed by U.S. President Donald J. Trump, claiming they have harmed the global economy—seen by many as an admission that Trump’s tariff policies have had a significant impact on China specifically.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Premier Li Qiang, President Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron, and global trade partners.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday, during an international forum in Beijing.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Starting from the beginning of this year, we’ve seen the stick of tariffs being wielded around the world with growing restrictive measures on the economy and trade, which have dealt a severe blow to the global economy.” – Li Qiang

🎯IMPACT: China’s trade surplus reached a record $1.076 trillion, though Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by nearly 30 percent year-on-year last month.

IN FULL

Chinese Premier Li Qiang—the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) second most powerful leader next to President Xi Jinping—says global trade tariffs have dealt a “severe blow” to the world economy. Alluding to the tariffs on China imposed by U.S. President Donald J. Trump, Li told attendees at an international forum in Beijing on Tuesday that trade levies have resulted in significant supply chain disruptions, claiming “Starting from the beginning of this year, we’ve seen the stick of tariffs being wielded around the world with growing restrictive measures on the economy and trade, which have dealt a severe blow to the global economy.”

Implicit in Li’s remarks is the admission that U.S. tariffs enacted by the Trump administration have caused a significant negative impact on China’s export economy, which is highly reliant on selling goods to American consumers. Data released by Chinese customs officials shows that exports to the United States year-on-year fell by 28.7 percent in November. Notably, Chinese government data is often manipulated to present a more favorable picture than reality, suggesting that Trump tariffs have likely had an even more profound impact on Chinese exports.

Meanwhile, Chinese officials claim the country’s exports to other nations grew by 5.4 percent, fueling a record $1.076 trillion trade surplus. Again, the Chinese claims should be viewed with caution, given the country’s history of manipulating official government data for propaganda purposes.

Over the last year, international finance experts have noted that the Chinese economy has experienced persistent deflation, well outside the parameters considered acceptable by the CCP. The deflationary cycle in China has seen the rapid collapse of consumer and producer prices, driven by supply-side overcapacity—meaning Chinese manufacturers are producing more goods than the country can export or consume internally.

Western nations—and, critically, Europe—appear to be growing wary of Beijing’s predatory trade practices. French President Emmanuel Macron floated the possibility of European Union (EU) tariffs on Chinese goods during a recent visit to Beijing, while the European Commission—the bloc’s unelected executive—is moving to address China’s practice of dumping imports to undermine domestic industries on the continent.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Religious Decline in America Shows Signs of Stabilizing.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: New research suggests a potential stabilization in the number of Americans identifying as religious, following decades of decline.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Pew Research Center, Gregory A. Smith, Conrad Hackett, and other researchers tracking religious trends.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Perhaps in the future we’ll look back and see that we were at a pivotal moment in 2025,” said Pew’s Gregory A. Smith.

🎯IMPACT: The stabilization could influence social, cultural, and political life, potentially slowing the pace of religious and civic transformation in the U.S.

IN FULL

After years in which Americans steadily became less religious, new findings from the Pew Research Center show that this downward movement has flattened since 2020. The shift stands out because previous surveys had consistently recorded declines across religious identity, practice, and belief. Gregory A. Smith, Pew’s Senior Associate Director of Research, described the recent pattern as “striking.”

Christianity remains the nation’s largest religious tradition, claimed by 62 percent of U.S. adults, and its historical influence on American society and politics continues to be significant. Several indicators of religious engagement, including how often people pray, how important they say religion is, and how frequently they attend services, have held steady in recent years. Despite steep drops in religiosity over the past decade noted by Gallup, about seven in ten adults still say they belong to a religion.

Generational contrasts remain sharp: 55 percent of adults in their twenties report a religious identity, compared with 83 percent among the oldest Americans. Their practices differ as well; older adults are far more likely to pray every day (59 percent) than younger adults (30 percent). Smith pointed out that young people frequently adopt the religious routines of the households in which they grow up, though those habits may shift as they move through adulthood.

According to Pew demographer Conrad Hackett, global trends in religious change do not follow a single pattern; as he put it, “This secular transition isn’t completely uniform, and it may not be inevitable everywhere.” Researchers note that the current leveling off could persist, yet the future direction of religious affiliation in the United States remains uncertain.

“Perhaps in the future we’ll look back and see that we were at a pivotal moment in 2025,” Smith said adding, “But historical data suggests the patterns we see today are a normal result of the youngest adults possibly following the religiousness of their parents for a few years past the age of 18, after which their religiousness begins to drop.”

Some trends have shown an increased enthusiasm for Christianity among young people, particularly young men. Following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, some observed that young men were attending Church more frequently and expressing more interest in Christianity. In Britain, young men have been flocking to the Roman Catholic Church in large numbers as well.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Blasts ‘Disaster’ Sadiq Khan, Says He Owes Mayoralty to Mass Migration.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump criticized London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, calling him a “disaster” who owes his position to mass migration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Mayor Khan, and London residents.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s comments were published on December 9, 2025, in POLITICO.

💬KEY QUOTE: “He’s a disaster. He’s a disaster. He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: A spokesman for Khan, who has smeared Trump as racist, Islamophobic, and so on for years, called the America First leader’s latest remarks “appalling and bigoted.”

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has said that Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan, of Britain’s governing Labour Party, owes his office to mass migration. Speaking to POLITICO, the America First leader called Khan a “a horrible mayor… an incompetent mayor… he’s a horrible, vicious, disgusting mayor.”

“I think he’s done a terrible job. London’s a different place. I love London. I love London. And I hate to see it happen,” Trump continued, saying of Khan: “He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have… he gets elected because so many people have come in. They vote for him now because you know, it’s like… it’s one of those things.”

Trump also criticized European leaders more broadly, accusing “politically correct” politicians of refusing to deport illegal migrants and allowing cities such as London and Paris, France, to lose their traditional identity.

Notably, London is only around one-third White British, according to the last official census, and over 40 percent of the city’s residents were born overseas. In some London boroughs, such as Tower Hamlets, residents are complaining that their Bangladeshi heritage elected officials are not performing their duties adequately because they are preoccupied with parallel political careers in Bangladesh.

A spokesman for Mayor Khan condemned the remarks as “appalling and bigoted.” Khan, a son of Pakistani immigrants, has long championed increased immigration, claiming it is benefits the economy despite strong evidence that most lower-immigrant migrant workers are a net drain on the public finances, with migrants who do not work being an even bigger drain.

Khan has a long history of accusing Trump of racism, sexism, and so-called Islamophobia, and backed a campaign to block a state visit during Trump’s first term.

Image by John Clempner.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Japan Reels From 7.5 Magnitude Quake, Airport and Nuclear Fuel Plant Damaged, 34 Injured.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A 7.5 magnitude earthquake struck Japan, causing injuries, minor damage, and a tsunami along its Pacific coast.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Japanese authorities, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the Fire and Disaster Management Agency, and the Japan Meteorological Agency.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The quake occurred late Monday night near Aomori, Japan, with tsunami waves affecting nearby coastal regions.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are putting people’s lives first and doing everything we can.” – Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi

🎯IMPACT: Injuries were reported, power was disrupted, and transportation services were temporarily suspended. Authorities are monitoring for aftershocks.

IN FULL

Japan is gauging regional damage in the aftermath of a powerful 7.5 magnitude earthquake that struck late Monday night. The quake caused injuries, minor damage, and a tsunami along the Pacific coast. Authorities are warning residents about potential aftershocks as emergency teams continue to evaluate the situation.

The quake, recorded at 7.5 magnitude by Japanese authorities and 7.6 by the U.S. Geological Survey, occurred at 11:15 PM in the Pacific Ocean. Its epicenter was located 80 kilometers off the coast of Aomori, with a depth of 44 kilometers. Tsunami waves up to 70 centimeters were recorded at Kuji port in Iwate prefecture, while other coastal areas saw waves of up to 50 centimeters.

According to Japanese public broadcaster NHK, most injuries were caused by falling objects in homes and businesses. The country’s Fire and Disaster Management Agency reported that at least 34 people were injured, with one person in serious condition. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi announced the formation of an emergency task force, stating, “We are putting people’s lives first and doing everything we can.”

Approximately 800 homes lost power, and Shinkansen bullet trains were suspended in parts of the region. Power was mostly restored by Tuesday morning, according to Tohoku Electric Power Co. About 480 residents sought shelter at Hachinohe Air Base, and 18 defense helicopters were deployed for damage assessment. Some 200 passengers were stranded overnight at New Chitose Airport in Hokkaido due to structural damage in a terminal building.

The Nuclear Regulation Authority reported a 450-liter water spill at the Rokkasho fuel reprocessing plant, but confirmed that no safety concerns were raised. The Japan Meteorological Agency issued a warning of possible aftershocks and urged residents to remain prepared, citing a slight increase in the risk of a magnitude 8-level earthquake. Smaller aftershocks, including a magnitude 6.6 and 5.1, were recorded in the hours following the initial quake.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Minnesota Fraud Scandal Deepens as Feds Try to Recover Millions of Stolen Taxpayer Dollars.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump and Republican allies have launched new investigations into Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud scandal, aiming to recover stolen taxpayer funds and enforce stricter accountability measures.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Republican members of Congress, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials, state Democrats, and those charged in the fraud scheme.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The fraud occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, with ongoing investigations and legal actions taking place as of 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people—there is no simpler truth,” said Alvin Winston, FBI special agent in charge.

🎯IMPACT: The investigation has led to dozens of convictions, legislative reforms in Minnesota, and an ongoing effort to recover stolen funds.

IN FULL

The Trump administration and Congress have initiated several new investigations into the Minnesota state government and the Feeding Our Future nonprofit, the latter of which is embroiled in a $250 million fraud scheme that exploited a meal program for needy children during the COVID-19 pandemic. While a number of the culprits behind the fraud—many of them of Somali origin—have been convicted, federal agencies are still attempting to recover millions in stolen taxpayer funds.

The fraud involved conspirators falsely claiming to have served tens of millions of meals to children and submitting fabricated records. The stolen funds were used to purchase luxury homes, vehicles, and other high-end items. Evidence presented during trials included cash, gold jewelry, and financial records tied to extravagant purchases. The nonprofit has numerous ties to the state’s Somali immigrant community and used those connections to shield itself from scrutiny. Whistleblowers allege Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) was complicit in attempts to cover for the Somali community.

To date, federal officials have recovered an estimated $60 million, less than half of the $250 million stolen. Efforts to trace and seize assets, both domestic and abroad, have caused delays in the recovery process. Some convicted individuals funneled money through shell corporations or used it to pay personal expenses.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel called the scheme “one of the worst” in Minnesota’s history, highlighting the misappropriation of federal funds intended to support children during a crisis. Senior FBI officials have noted that the investigation has already prompted legislative reforms in Minnesota, and additional charges are expected.

Alvin Winston, the FBI’s special agent in charge, emphasized the gravity of the crime, stating, “Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people — there is no simpler truth.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tony Blair Excluded from Gaza Peace Panel After Arab States Object.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Sir Tony Blair will not hold a leading position on a proposed Gaza peace council, following objections from Arab states.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair, U.S. President Donald J. Trump, and Arab leaders.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Reported on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, regarding the Gaza peace council.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I liked Blair, but I want to make sure he’s acceptable to all parties in the peace process.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Blair may still have a peripheral role, but his involvement has been significantly reduced due to regional backlash.

IN FULL

Former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair will not hold a leading position on a proposed Gaza peace council, following strong objections from Arab states. Blair had been closely linked to a plan supported by U.S. President Donald J. Trump to rebuild Gaza following years of conflict.

Arab leaders expressed deep resentment over Blair’s role in orchestrating the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which has left lasting scars in the region. Blair’s only supporters appear to have been the United States and Israel. The backlash has resulted in Blair being quietly sidelined and dropped from consideration for the top role in overseeing Gaza‘s reconstruction.

However, it is expected that Blair will retain a peripheral role in the peace process. President Trump has previously sought to have Blair head the proposed council, but sought buy-in from regional leaders. “I liked Blair, but I want to make sure he’s acceptable to all parties in the peace process,” Trump stated, signaling his willingness to adapt to regional concerns over Blair’s involvement.

In September, President Trump unveiled a 20-point peace plan ending the war in the Gaza Strip, proposing a transitional governance system and conditions for peace. While both Israel and Hamas agreed to the terms, the process of winding down the conflict has not been entirely smooth. Both Israel and Hamas have renewed hostilities for brief periods since September, but as of now, the peace process continues.

The 20-point proposal includes a transitional governance system for Gaza, managed by a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee. This body would oversee public services and redevelopment efforts until the Palestinian Authority is prepared to assume control. This would be supervised by a “Board of Peace” chaired by President Trump and included Blair.

Image via Chatham House.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Ramps Up Pressure on Zelensky to Accept Peace Deal.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is increasing pressure on Ukraine to begin peace negotiations with Russia, urging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to accept the reality that the country is losing the war.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The interview was released on Tuesday, December 9, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You know, when you’re losing… they’ve lost territory long before I got here. They lost a whole strip of seafront, big seafront… You certainly wouldn’t say it’s a victory.” — Trump

🎯IMPACT: In recent months, the Trump White House has expressed increasing frustration with both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin over their intransigence toward finding an end to the conflict between their nations.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump is increasing pressure on Ukraine to begin peace negotiations with Russia, stating during an interview released on Tuesday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “[has] to get on the ball and start accepting things.” Speaking with POLITICO, Trump urged Zelensky and the wider world to begin dealing with the reality of the Russian war in Ukraine: “You know, when you’re losing… they’ve lost territory long before I got here. They lost a whole strip of seafront, big seafront… You certainly wouldn’t say it’s a victory.”


President Trump previously suggested that Zelensky has yet even to review the details of the peace proposal. “A lot of people are dying, so it would be really good if he’d read it. His people loved the proposal… I think he should find time to read it,” the U.S President said.


In recent months, the Trump White House has expressed increasing frustration with both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin over their intransigence toward finding an end to the conflict between their nations. Trump has consistently noted that the war is costing significant lives on both sides and has tried to push both leaders to the negotiating table.

Acknowledging the reality on the ground, Trump said, “I give the people of Ukraine and the military of Ukraine tremendous credit for the, you know, bravery and for the fighting and all of that. But, you know, at some point, size will win, generally.” While Trump stated that recent comments that the U.S. would soon walk away from Ukraine were “not correct,” he did acknowledge that it wasn’t “exactly wrong,” arguing that Zelensky must “play ball.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Hints at Military Option in Venezuela, Declares Maduro’s Regime Nearing End.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump stated during an interview that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s “days are numbered” but declined to comment on the possibility of U.S. troops being sent to the country.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Nicolás Maduro, and POLITICO reporter Dasha Burns.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made in an interview with POLITICO, released on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “His days are numbered.” – Donald Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The statements highlight increasing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, with potential implications for U.S. foreign policy in the region.

IN FULL

In an interview with POLITICO released on Tuesday, President Donald J. Trump declared that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro‘s “days are numbered.” When pressed on whether U.S. troops could be sent to Venezuela, Trump declined to provide a definitive answer, stating, “I don’t comment on that” and “I wouldn’t say that one way or the other.”

The President’s remarks came amid rising tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, following recent U.S. strikes on cartel drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific. Late last month, Trump suggested the U.S. could “very soon” target Venezuelan drug traffickers on land and declared that the country’s airspace should be considered “closed.”

During the interview, Trump was asked how far he would go to remove Maduro from office. The President responded, “I don’t want to say that,” but stressed, “His days are numbered.” When asked again if he would rule out a U.S. ground invasion, Trump replied, “I don’t want to rule in or out.”

The President also addressed broader regional concerns, including the potential for similar actions against drug traffickers in Mexico and Colombia. When asked if the U.S. would consider measures like the boat strikes to combat fentanyl trafficking, Trump responded affirmatively, saying, “Yeah, I would. Sure, I would.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tim Walz’s Lt. Gov. Skipped Required Safety Meetings Prior to Speaker’s Assassination.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan (D) failed to hold mandated quarterly safety meetings before the assassination of state House Speaker Melissa Hortman (D), drawing criticism for neglecting her duties.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Peggy Flanagan, Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, and alleged assassin Vance Boelter.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The oversight spans from 2019 to 2024 in Minnesota. Hortman’s assassination occurred on June 14, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s incredibly irresponsible, and frankly just confusing, that the elected official who chairs the committee and has her office within the Capitol complex, refuses to take the responsibility of this group seriously.” – Minnesota House GOP Whip Jim Nash

🎯IMPACT: The lack of meetings has raised questions about Flanagan’s leadership and could hinder her campaign for U.S. Senate.

IN FULL

Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan (D) is facing sharp criticism for not holding the legally required quarterly meetings of the state’s Capitol security committee in the years leading up to the June 14 assassination of House Speaker Melissa Hortman and the earlier shooting of state Senator John Hoffman and his wife.

State law requires the Minnesota Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security—which Flanagan chairs—to meet four times a year to oversee safety for lawmakers, staff, and visitors. Between 2019 and 2024, however, the panel convened only 13 times instead of the mandated 24.

“The Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security is designed to ensure that legislators, visitors, and staff at the Capitol are kept as safe as possible, but we can’t fulfill that duty if the chair refuses to actually call meetings as required by law,” said House GOP Whip Jim Nash. He added, “There are a lot of conversations to be had and decisions to be made, especially this year, and the fact that she has kept this committee on the back burner for years is shameful.”

Flanagan, currently running for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Senator Tina Smith, has defended herself, saying, “We take this very seriously and that’s how we’re going to move forward.”

The same pattern applies to another panel she leads: the Minnesota Interagency Council on Homelessness held just 15 of its required 24 quarterly meetings over the same five-year period. Critics say the repeated failure to meet legal obligations raises serious questions about her leadership as she campaigns for higher office.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tribunal Finds Socialized Health Service Unlawfully Harassed Nurse Over Trans Changing Room Complaint.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A National Health Service (NHS) nurse in the United Kingdom won part of her employment tribunal case after complaining about sharing a female-only changing room with a transgender doctor.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nurse Sandie Peggie, Dr. Beth Upton (formerly Theodore), and NHS Fife.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Scotland, tribunal hearings in Dundee, with the judgment delivered this month.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am beyond relieved and delighted that the tribunal has found that my employer Fife Health Board harassed me after I complained about having to share a female-only changing room with a male colleague.” – Sandie Peggie

🎯IMPACT: The tribunal upheld the harassment claim against NHS Fife, but dismissed allegations of discrimination and victimisation, as well as claims against Dr. Upton.

IN FULL

A British National Health Service (NHS) nurse, Sandie Peggie, has secured a partial victory at an employment tribunal against NHS Fife after raising objections to sharing a female-only changing room with a transgender doctor, Dr. Beth Upton (formerly Theodore). The dispute centred on Ms Peggie’s discomfort at sharing the space with a man, and on later allegations by Dr. Upton that Ms Peggie had engaged in bullying and harassment.

The tribunal, held in Dundee, Scotland, upheld Peggie’s claim of harassment by her employer but rejected her claims of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and victimization.

In its decision, the tribunal found that NHS Fife had acted improperly by failing to revoke permission for Upton to use the women-only changing room, and by dragging out the investigation into the complaint for an unreasonably long time. The board also made “inappropriate references to patient care allegations” against Peggie during that process, which the tribunal said contributed to the harassing conduct.

Peggie reacted to the ruling saying, “I am beyond relieved and delighted that the tribunal has found that my employer, Fife Health Board, harassed me after I complained about having to share a female-only changing room with a male colleague.”

The allegations against Upton were dismissed; the tribunal found no wrongdoing on his part. Peggie’s solicitor, Margaret Gribbon, described the outcome as “a huge win for a tenacious and courageous woman standing up for her sex-based rights,” and noted the case had been “extraordinarily lengthy and complex.”

The case comes against a broader legal backdrop that has recently changed in Britain. On April 16, 2025, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that, under the terms of the Equality Act 2010, the words “woman” and “sex” refer to biological sex at birth, not gender identity.

The court held that transgender “women” do not meet the legal definition of a woman for the purposes of certain sex-based protections and single-sex spaces such as changing rooms, refuges, hospitals, and women-only services. As a result, institutions such as hospitals, shelters, sports clubs, and other single-sex services now have clearer legal ground to exclude transgenders from female-only spaces.

Image by Maggie Jones.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.