Tuesday, March 17, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 15: Cohen The Embezzler Get’s Costello’ed.

The fifteenth day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based hush money trial saw the prosecution‘s case end with a catastrophic admission of theft by Michael Cohen as the prosecution rested its case. Even more troublesome for District Attorney Alvin Bragg was that Trump’s defense team brought Robert Costello, Michael Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, as its second witness.

Costello, the former Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York, made his career telling juries the truth. Before giving his testimony on Monday, Costello testified before Congress last week that Cohen had repeatedly said to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump when facing criminal investigation in 2018. On Monday, he told the same recollection of events to the Manhattan jury.

COHEN CONFESSES A CRIME.

The final day of Michael Cohen’s cross-examination by Trump‘s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, ended with the serial perjurer potentially adding a new crime to his rap sheet. Cohen, on the witness stand, admitted to stealing tens of thousands of dollars from the Trump Organization.

In the course of discussing the legal services invoices that Cohen filed with the Trump Organization — allegedly reimbursing him for the hush money payment made to Stormy Daniels — Blanche dropped a bombshell on the disgraced attorney. “You did steal from the Trump Organization based upon the expected reimbursement from Red Finch?” he asked Cohen. The disbarred lawyer responded: “Yes, sir.”

Documents presented by Trump’s defense team show Cohen receiving $50,000 for a payment to a tech company called Red Finch. However, Cohen only paid the company $20,000 and pocketed the $30,000 difference. Cohen testified that while the owner of Red Finch would have preferred his invoice to be paid in full, he was “placated for the time being” with the partial $20,000 payment. The National Pulse reported earlier on Monday that CNN legal analyst Elie Honig described the exchange as a “bomb dropped right in the middle of the prosecution‘s case.”

Cohen claimed he began pocketing the money after being shorted a $100,000 bonus. Cohen’s total theft came to $60,000 when “grossed up” for taxes. It is unclear whether District Attorney Avlin Bragg will consider charges against Cohen, especially considering that he confessed to committing a crime on the witness stand while under oath.

DANIEL GOLDMAN DID PREP COHEN.

In another shocking admission, Cohen acknowledged that he was prepped for cross-examination by Representative Daniel Goldman (D-NY). The National Pulse reported last Tuesday that Goldman admitted during an appearance on MSNBC to having assisted with Cohen’s testimony and preparation for cross-examination by former President Trump’s defense team. Even more concerning is that Goldman is a client of Authentic Campaigns, a Democrat-aligned political fundraising firm where Judge Juan Merchan‘s daughter, Loren Merchan, is a partner. Goldman also served as lead counsel during the first Trump impeachment.

The connections between Goldman and Loren Merchan deepened after it was revealed on Friday that Goldman’s campaign payments to Authentic Campaigns were not sent to their office address but to Loren Merchan’s residential address in Richmond, Virginia. Goldman (D-NY) appears to have sent over $160,000 in checks to the home address of Loren Merchan, adding further credence to claims that Judge Juan Merchan should have recused himself from the case to do conflicts of interest.

BACK TO STORMY. 

As the morning wore on, Blanche returned to Cohen‘s payment to Stormy Daniels. “You told multiple people when it first leaked that President Trump knew nothing about the payment, correct?” the lead defense counsel asked Cohen, who confirmed that was the case.

Pressing on, Blanched asked Cohen: “You even called Melania, the first lady, and told her that President Trump didn’t know about it?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche that he had told New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman on the record that the former President was unaware of the payment when it was made.

Cohen went on to testify that he recorded conversations with reports in which he stated that Trump was unaware of the Daniels payment until it had already been made. Blanche asked the serial perjurer if it was correct that he “had told anybody who asked that President Trump knew nothing about the payment at the time.”

“That’s what I said, yes,” Cohen replied.

PRELUDE TO COSTELLO.

The defense’s cross-examination of Cohen began to wind down with Blanche pivoting to the disgraced attorney’s conversations with his then-legal counsel, Robert Costello. Blanche presented the jury with documentation of 75 phone conversations between Cohen and Costello. He asked Cohen if he’d be surprised to know that he communicated with Costello for over nine hours in just two months. “No sir,” Cohen responded.

“So would it surprise you to learn that you actually communicated on the phone, either you calling Mr Costello or Mr Costello calling you 75 times?” Blanche asked again, with Cohen responding: “Seems excessive but possible.” The serial perjurer also acknowledged meeting with Costello several times in person.

MORE MONEY, MORE PROBLEMS.

Moving on from Costello, Blanche again pressed Cohen on his finances. The disgraced attorney said he stopped making money after pleading guilty to tax crimes in 2018. “Did you stop making money when you plead guilty in 2018?” Blanche asked. Cohen confirmed this was the case.

Pushing further, Blanche asked Cohen if he made any income between is incarceration and the publication of his book. Cohen acknowledged he did not. However, since 2020, Cohen testified he’s earned over $4.4 million from his attacks on former President Trump and the Biden government’s lawfare campaign against the 2024 Republican presidential nominee. He said he’s made at least $1 million from his MeidasTouch-hosted Mea Culpa podcast and $3.4 million from the two books he published.

“Do you have a financial interest in the outcome of this case?” Blanche asked Cohen, who responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche continued: “Because if President Trump is convicted, that would benefit you personally and financially, right?”

“No sir,” Cohen insisted before continuing: “I talk about it on my podcasts, I talk about it on TikTok, and they make money, and that’s how I was viewing your question. Whether Mr. Trump is ultimately determined innocent or guilty is not going to affect whether I speak about it or not.”

Cohen’s cross-examination ended with a simple question posed by Blanche: “It’s true that you will lie out of loyalty, correct?”

“Yes sir,” the serial perjurer replied.

PROSECUTION GOES FOR BROKE. 

Following the lunch break, Alvin Bragg‘s prosecution team went for broke and tried to convince Judge Merchan to delay the trial until Tuesday morning as they tried to recall an expert witness who had already left New York City for Louisiana. Prosecutors moved to add a series of C-SPAN photos of former President Trump and Keith Schiller into evidence, asking it be allowed to confirm the veracity of the photos with their witness, a C-SPAN archivist. Trump’s defense team raised a hearsay objection to the photo and witness.

After reviewing the prosecution’s photo evidence, Judge Mechan said, “I don’t see how the people can get past the hearsay objection.” At this point, a back-and-forth erupted between the defense and prosecution over delaying the trial, with Trump‘s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, telling Judge Merchan that the defense only had a few witnesses who were ready to testify and that they aimed to rest their case shortly after the prosecution potentially.

Eventually, however, the two sides agreed on a process to enter one photo of Trump and Schiller into evidence without the C-SPAN archivist. Michael Cohen again briefly took the stand to confirm the photo. Judge Merchan excluded the other. Following this, the prosecution rested its case.

In hindsight, the prosecution‘s attempt to delay the trial a day was likely in anticipation of the second witness the defense would bring in the afternoon — hoping to buy time to prepare for testimony from the one man who could undercut almost all of Cohen‘s claims.

COSTELLO TAKES THE STAND.

By late afternoon, it was time for former President Donald Trump‘s defense team to mount this case. The first witness was a paralegal from Todd Blanche’s law office named Daniel Sitko. His primary role was to confirm the process by which he compiled the log of phone calls between Cohen and Robert Costello. At this point, everyone in the courtroom had an inkling of who the defense would call next.

Trump’s defense attorney, Emil Bove, stood and announced: “The defense calls Robert Costello.” This was met with an immediate request to approach the bench for the prosecution. During the sidebar, Judge Merchan told Trump‘s defense team: “I do wish that we had discussed this earlier.”

The prosecution asked Merchan to limit Costello’s testimony, with Susan Hoffinger arguing: “They should be restricted to two questions frankly that Cohen testified he didn’t recall. He didn’t recall Costello telling him that he should cooperate against Trump. He didn’t recall the words saying that he said to Mr. Costello that he had nothing on President Trump.”

Merchan eventually determined that Costello could testify on two of Cohen‘s statements but did give Trump’s defense team some latitude on additional topics.

COSTELLO ON COHEN.

Michael Cohen‘s former defense attorney’s testimony was met with a series of furious objections by the prosecution, which sought to prevent the decorated attorney and former federal prosecutor from completely undercutting its star witness. Much of Costello’s testimony repeated what he had already said under oath before Congress last week.

The National Pulse reported last Wednesday that Costello told Congress that Cohen had repeatedly told him in 2018: “I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump.” He also testified that he met Cohen at the Regency Hotel on April 17, 2018, and found the serial perjurer to be manic and suicidal.

As Costello’s testimony in the hush money trial continued, the prosecution challenged his every word with objections. Before the witness could even finish a sentence, Judge Merchan would often sustain the objection. This caused Costello to become annoyed and add a bit of his own commentary to the judge’s rulings, muttering “Jesus” and “Geez” several times under his breath.

After Judge Merchan called the prosecution and the defense to the bench for a sidebar, Costello leaned into his microphone and uttered, “Ridiculous.” Merchan met Costello’s exasperations several times on the stand, asking the witness, “Sorry?”

COSTELLO VERSUS MERCHAN.

Following additional back-and-forths between Costello and Merchan, the judge asked the jury to leave the courtroom. He turned to Costello and said: “Mr. Costello, you’re to remain seated.” Costello audibly sighed and rolled his eyes at the judge.

“I want to discuss proper decorum in my courtroom,” Merchan said, now visibly annoyed, before chastising Costello further: “You don’t give me a side eye, and you don’t roll your eyes.” He continued: “When there’s a witness on the stand, if you don’t like my ruling, you don’t say ‘jeez,’ and you don’t say strike it.”

Costello, now as equally annoyed as Merchan, stared the judge down. “Are you staring me down?” Judge Merchan asked before promptly clearing the whole courtroom.

After a brief break, the defense continued direct examination of Costello. After a few more questions, the prosecution began its cross-examination, which was uneventful. Just after 4:30PM, the court adjourned for the day with further cross-examination of Costello set for Tuesday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Fourteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

SCOTUS Pauses ‘TPS’ Trump Deportations, Will Rule by June.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deporting Syrians and Haitians under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) while expediting arguments for April.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Solicitor General D. John Sauer, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was issued Monday, with arguments set for April, and a ruling expected by the end of June.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Given lower courts’ persistent disregard for this court’s actions in other TPS cases.” – Solicitor General D. John Sauer

🎯IMPACT: The Supreme Court’s decision will determine the future of TPS designations and the validity of claims by TPS holders.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deporting 6,000 Syrians and 350,000 Haitians who were granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS) under Presidents Obama, Biden, and Trump himself. The court also expedited arguments for April, with a decision expected by the end of June.

Federal law allows presidents to grant TPS to individuals from countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary circumstances.

President Trump seeks to end TPS for individuals from 13 countries, including Myanmar, Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, and Venezuela, among others.

The Trump administration requested the Supreme Court to block lower court orders that continued TPS for Syrians and Haitians.

Syrians have been eligible for TPS since 2012, during the Obama administration, due to the ongoing conflict under Bashar al-Assad. Trump extended their status in 2018. Haitians have qualified since 2010, following a devastating earthquake and subsequent political unrest. Biden extended their status in 2021.

Last year, then-Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced plans to revoke TPS for Haiti and Syria, citing that neither country met the program’s requirements.

A ruling is expected by late June.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. Wounded Count Tops 200 Across 7 Countries.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Over 200 U.S. troops have been wounded in the ongoing U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. troops, Iran, and U.S. Central Command, with statements from Navy Capt. Tim Hawkins and Gen. Dan Caine.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The campaign began three weeks ago, affecting U.S. troops in Bahrain, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

💬KEY QUOTE: “U. S. and partner strikes are doing exactly what they are intended to do: Deliver on very clear military objectives to eliminate Iran’s ability to project power against Americans and against its neighbors,” said Adm. Charles “Brad” Cooper.

🎯IMPACT: The campaign has resulted in significant military actions, with over 7,000 targets hit in Iran by U.S. forces.

IN FULL

The number of U.S. troops injured in the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran has surpassed 200, according to a statement by Navy Capt. Tim Hawkins, the chief spokesman for U.S. Central Command. This figure provides the most detailed account yet of the risks faced by American personnel.

Hawkins noted that U.S. troops have been wounded in several countries, including Bahrain, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. He stated that most injuries occurred in the early days of the conflict, with over 180 troops having returned to duty.

The injuries have been primarily linked to Iran’s missile and drone attacks, which were launched in response to President Donald Trump’s military campaign against Iran. The U.S. has focused its recent strikes on Iranian missile launchers and drone facilities to reduce Iran’s retaliatory capabilities.

On Monday, President Trump said he was “shocked” by Iran lashing out at its regional neighbors.

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, highlighted that most injuries were caused by one-way attack drones. He confirmed that many of the wounded have returned to duty, with injuries reported in various locations across the region.

Seven U.S. troops lost their lives in Iranian attacks, while six more tragically passed away last week when a KC-135 refueling plane crashed in Iraq. U.S. military officials have confirmed that this unfortunate incident was an accident involving another aircraft.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Another Illegal Alien Trucker Leaves a U.S. Citizen in Critical Condition.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An illegal alien truck driver was accused of causing a crash that left a U.S. citizen in critical condition in Indianapolis, Indiana.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sukhdev Singh, a 25-year-old illegal alien, and a U.S. citizen pedestrian.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 6, at E Raymond Street and I-65 in Indianapolis, Indiana.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is common sense: illegal aliens should not be operating 18-wheelers on American highways.” – DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis

🎯IMPACT: Renewed scrutiny on state policies allowing illegal immigrants to obtain commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs).

IN FULL

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested Sukhdev Singh, an illegal immigrant truck driver accused of causing a crash that left a U.S. citizen in critical condition in Indianapolis, Indiana. The incident occurred on March 6 at E Raymond Street and I-65, where Singh allegedly struck a pedestrian.

Indiana State Police responded to the scene and took Singh into custody, contacting ICE when they discovered the truck driver was an illegal immigrant. ICE officials later confirmed Singh’s arrest and stated that he will remain in custody pending the outcome of his immigration proceedings. The victim was transported to a local hospital and remains in critical condition as of the latest update.

Singh, who held a commercial driver’s license (CDL) issued by Democrat-run New York, has drawn renewed attention to state policies regarding the issuance of CDLs to illegal immigrants. The National Pulse reported last December that U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Sean Duffy had warned New York it could lose $73 million in federal highway funding following a Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) audit which revealed that 53 percent of sampled CDLs issued by the New York Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) were unlawfully granted to foreign nationals residing in the U.S. illegally.

In February, the Trump administration moved to shut down an estimated 8,000 sham truck driving schools that served as conduits for illegal immigrants to obtain CDLs. The FMCSA has found that, in that month alone, 550 CDL truck driving schools and training facilities violated its standards.

“It is common sense: illegal aliens should not be operating 18-wheelers on American highways,” Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement, continuing, “We are praying this individual makes a full recovery. It is incredibly dangerous for illegal aliens, who often don’t know our traffic laws or even English, to be operating 18-wheelers on America’s roads.”

“Sanctuary governors like Kathy Hochul must stop giving illegal aliens driver’s licenses before even more Americans get injured or killed,” Bis added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New York Post Reveals How Migrants Are Voting in U.S. Elections.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A detailed investigation published by the New York Post reveals systemic failures in America’s voter registration and electoral system have allowed for hundreds of thousands of noncitizens to register as voters in U.S. elections.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Representative Chip Roy (R-TX), Public Interest Legal Foundation president J. Christian Adams, and noncitizen voters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The report was published on March 16, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I wish it were a conspiracy plot because it would be easier to bust. This is systemic failure.”  – J. Christian Adams

🎯IMPACT: President Donald J. Trump is pushing the SAVE America Act, legislation aiming to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections. However, the bill is stalled in the Senate, unable to overcome a Democrat filibuster.

IN FULL

A detailed investigation published by the New York Post reveals systemic failures in America’s voter registration and electoral system that have allowed hundreds of thousands of noncitizens to register to vote in U.S. elections. While allegations of concerted efforts by Democrat-aligned nonprofits and electioneering groups seeking to register noncitizens have dominated headlines, The Post has found that government-sanctioned voter registration programs, a lack of election law enforcement, and a lack of awareness on the part of noncitizens are more often at fault for illegal registrations.

“At times, it’s an organic process of aliens getting sucked in unwittingly. Maybe they’d been whipping down Modelos [beers] at a festival, and they’re doing some guy a favor who is in their face with a clipboard. Or, they’re at the DMV and get these pop-up windows asking them to register. They think, ‘I must be allowed,’” J. Christian Adams, president of Public Interest Legal Foundation, explained. “I wish it were a conspiracy plot because it would be easier to bust. This is systemic failure.”

“It’s way worse than the left says, but it’s way better than some others say,” Adams suggested.

The breakdowns in election law and procedures meant to prevent noncitizens from registering to vote and casting ballots in American elections may occur primarily at the local level. Database glitches, human error, and negligence are most often cited as the cause for noncitizens appearing on voter rolls. This is compounded by a general lack of awareness and confusion among noncitizens, who, as Adams noted, are often presented with the option to register to vote when filing paperwork at their local DMV, despite this being illegal.

Concerningly, data published by Rasmussen Reports in 2024 suggests a significant number of noncitizens are voting in American elections in contravention of federal law. According to the pollster, 97 percent of noncitizens polled acknowledged having voted for a candidate in the 2020 presidential election. In one survey, Rasmussen Reports polled 2,466 likely U.S. voters, of whom 222 either stated they were noncitizens or did not know their citizenship status—meaning 10 percent of the sample had questionable voting eligibility.

The potential impact that noncitizen voters could have in U.S. elections—especially local contests or races with very narrow margins of victory—has become a top issue for American voters. Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are pushing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act, legislation aiming to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections.

Proponents, including President Donald J. Trump and Representative Chip Roy (R-TX), argue the measure is essential to protect election integrity. However, the bill is currently stalled in the Senate, unable to overcome a Democrat filibuster. Polling shows over 70 percent of voters support the SAVE Act, including half of Democrats.

Image by Chris Phan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rasmussen: 61% Say Iran Strikes ‘Successful.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A recent Rasmussen Reports survey found that nearly two-thirds of American voters view the ongoing military operation against Iran as a success, though doubts remain about the United States’ alliance with Israel.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: 1,098 likely U.S. voters, as surveyed by Rasmussen Reports.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The survey was conducted nationally via telephone and online, from March 8-10, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The ongoing U.S. war against Iran is viewed as a success by most voters, although many have doubts about America’s military alliance with Israel.” – Rasmussen Reports

🎯IMPACT: The survey suggests the public believes President Donald J. Trump’s strikes on Iran are succeeding, but also reveals increasing skepticism toward American relations with Israel.

IN FULL

A new voter survey released by Rasmussen Reports has found that nearly two-thirds of American voters see President Donald J. Trump‘s authorization of U.S. military operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran as successful. According to the poll, 61 percent of likely American voters believe Operation Epic Fury has been successful so far, with 35 percent of respondents rating the strikes as “Very Successful.”

“The ongoing U.S. war against Iran is viewed as a success by most voters, although many have doubts about America’s military alliance with Israel,” Rasmussen Reports said of the poll, which was conducted between March 8 and 10, surveying 1,098 likely U.S. voters.

Twenty-nine percent of likely voters surveyed said they do not consider the military operation as successful, including 12 percent who describe the strikes as “Not At All Successful.” An additional 11 percent remain unsure about the operation’s effectiveness.

Meanwhile, the data found that a majority of likely voters neither see the U.S. alliance with Israel as good nor as bad for America. According to the survey, just 44 percent of respondents said the alliance is good for the United States, while 36 percent said it is not good. Notably, 20 percent said they were unsure.

The view of U.S.-Israeli relations becomes more stark when broken down along partisan identification. Rasmussen Reports found that just 26 percent of Democrats view the alliance as good for America, while 53 percent said it is bad. Among Republicans, 70 percent said the alliance with Israel is good for the U.S., while just 19 percent said it is bad. Independent voters split nearly evenly on the issue, with 38 percent saying it is good, and 35 percent describing the alliance as bad for America.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

WATCH: ‘I Can Do Anything I Want With It’ — Trump Predicts He Will Have ‘The Honor’ of ‘Taking Cuba.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has predicted that he will be the American leader to have “the honor” of finally “taking Cuba.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. President Donald J. Trump, Cuban exiles, and the Communist Party of Cuba.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 16, 2026, in the Oval Office.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba. That’s a big honor.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s comments add to the rising speculation that his administration is preparing to topple Cuba’s communist regime, which is reeling from an energy crisis caused by the removal of Marxist dictator Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which was Cuba’s chief source of oil.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump told the press he expects to be the U.S. leader who finally has “the honor” of “taking Cuba” in comments in the Oval Office on Monday. “A lot of Cubans have said, oh boy, would they love to go back… It’s a beautiful island; great weather,” he said, adding, “All my life I’ve been hearing about the United States and Cuba, ‘When will the United States do it?’ I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba. That’s a big honor.”

When asked by a reporter to clarify his remarks, Trump confirmed, “Taking Cuba, in some form, yeah,” emphasizing, “I mean, whether I free it, take it, I think I can do anything I want with it, if you wanna know the truth. They’re a very weakened nation right now.” Notably, Cuba is currently experiencing an energy crisis, precipitated by the U.S. ouster of Marxist dictator Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which was the communist-led island’s main source of oil.

Residents in central Cuba partially destroyed a local communist party headquarters during a protest over energy and food shortages over the weekend, underscoring the growing strain the regime is facing. The country’s leadership is already in talks with the Trump administration—at the same time as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is building a criminal case against them.

Trump’s comments on Monday follow comments earlier this month predicting “Cuba’s going to fall” and mulling the possibility of a “friendly takeover.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Dems Want CRIMINAL CHARGES For Ousted Kristi Noem. Here’s Why…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Congressional Democrats have requested criminal charges against outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, alleging she lied to Congress during recent hearings.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), Kristi Noem, President Donald J. Trump, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The accusations stem from testimony given earlier this month during oversight hearings in Congress.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Any claim that Secretary Noem committed perjury is categorically FALSE.” – DHS spokesman

🎯IMPACT: The allegations are unlikely to lead to criminal charges in the near term, though the statute of limitations for perjury extends for five years.

IN FULL

Congressional Democrats are pursuing criminal charges against outgoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, accusing her of making false statements during recent testimony. The allegations are detailed in a letter sent to the Department of Justice (DOJ) by Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), who claim Noem violated statutes prohibiting perjury and knowingly providing false statements to Congress.

“A number of her statements appear to violate criminal statutes prohibiting perjury and knowingly making false statements to Congress,” the Congressional Democrat letter states. It adds, “After months of evading our Committees’ requests to testify in routine oversight hearings, Secretary Noem made a series of demonstrably false statements in a brazen attempt to undermine critical congressional oversight of the Department of Homeland Security.”

The Democrat lawmakers allege that Noem’s testimony included misleading answers on topics such as DHS compliance with court orders, the role of Corey Lewandowski in DHS contracts, immigration enforcement practices, and the bidding process for a $220 million advertising campaign. During the hearings, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Noem about the ad campaign, which heavily featured her and allegedly lacked a competitive bidding process. Noem insisted the contracts were competitively bid and approved by career officials, but Kennedy and others have expressed skepticism.

The advertising campaign’s ties to former DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin and her husband, Benjamin Yoho, have also drawn scrutiny. Kennedy stated during a hearing earlier this month, “It’s something we have to defend. I’m on the Appropriations Committee. I mean, my research shows that you did not bid them out.”

Democrats argue that Noem’s testimony misrepresented facts, with Durbin and Raskin writing, “Even if Secretary Noem was the one telling the truth about the President’s knowledge, and she may well have been, she flatly misrepresented that the contract had been subject to a competitive bid.” The Trump administration has defended Noem, with a DHS spokesman calling the perjury claims “categorically FALSE.”

Noem’s removal from her position as DHS Secretary as of March 31 was recently announced by President Donald J. Trump. She has been reassigned to serve as a special envoy to the Shield of the Americas. Trump has nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) to replace her, with confirmation hearings expected soon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Lake Mead Is In Real Trouble, Which Means So Are Phoenix and Las Vegas.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal forecasts predict Lake Mead could sink to a record low within the next two years, falling below its 2022 levels.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Sharon Megdal of the University of Arizona, and stakeholders in the Colorado River system.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Projections released Friday indicate Lake Mead’s November 2027 level will fall to 1,032.76 feet above sea level. Lake Mead and Lake Powell are part of the Colorado River system in the Southwestern U.S.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Urgent, collective action is essential—we must move forward together, without further delay.” – Peter Soeth, USBR deputy chief of public affairs

🎯IMPACT: The Colorado River system faces critical strain, jeopardizing water supplies, irrigation, and hydropower generation for millions.

IN FULL

Water levels at Lake Mead in the Southwestern United States could hit an unprecedented low within the next two years, according to new federal forecasts. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) projects that the reservoir‘s November 2027 end-of-month level will reach 1,032.76 feet above sea level. This would be nearly eight feet below the previous record low set in 2022, when drought conditions exposed skeletal remains.

Lake Mead is a critical reservoir and part of the Colorado River system, which—along with Lake Powell—helps provide irrigation for over five million acres of farmland and drinking water to an estimated 40 million people across the Southwest. As of March 13, the lake was only 34 percent full, with 8.8 million acre-feet of water in storage—roughly 53 percent of the average level for the date.

Peter Soeth, USBR deputy chief of public affairs, emphasized the urgency of addressing the issue, stating, “Reclamation is closely monitoring hydrologic conditions and coordinating with stakeholders. The basin’s continued poor hydrologic outlook underscores the need for collaboration as we develop new operating guidelines for the Colorado River system. Urgent, collective action is essential—we must move forward together, without further delay.”

Concerningly, Lake Powell is also at risk, with earlier forecasts suggesting it could drop to minimum hydropower levels by this coming December. Such a scenario could threaten Glen Canyon Dam’s ability to generate electricity. Sharon Megdal, director of the University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center, described the situation as dire, stating, “Currently, the water-in-storage situation for the Colorado River system is not good. [There is] less in storage than last year, and current snow conditions are not good. Even if early 2026 snowpack is robust, the system will remain highly stressed.”

Major population centers across the Southwest—including Phoenix, Arizona, and Las Vegas, Nevada—are heavily reliant on the Colorado River system and its reservoir lakes for water. Without the system, neither city would be able to adequately provide drinking water to sustain its population.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Border Chief Ousted After Minnesota Climbdown, Greg Bovino, Retires.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Gregory Bovino, a prominent Border Patrol official, announced his retirement after nearly 30 years of service.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol agents, former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, and former White House Border Czar Tom Homan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Bovino announced his retirement in March 2026, following his removal from Minnesota operations earlier in the year.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The greatest honor of my entire life was to work alongside Border Patrol agents on the border and in the interior of the United States in some of the most challenging conditions the agency has ever faced,” said Bovino.

🎯IMPACT: Bovino’s operations, including “Operation Trojan Horse” and “Operation Midway Blitz,” resulted in thousands of arrests and demonstrated innovative enforcement methods.

IN FULL

Former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino is set to retire from the federal agency at the end of March 2026, capping a nearly 30-year career with the agency. Bovino expressed deep pride in his service, saying, “The greatest honor of my entire life was to work alongside Border Patrol agents on the border and in the interior of the United States in some of the most challenging conditions the agency has ever faced.”

He added, “Watching these agents out there giving it their all in some of the most dangerous of environments we have ever faced was humbling.” Bovino had been a central figure in President Donald J. Trump’s immigration enforcement initiatives, directing operations in major urban areas including Los Angeles, Chicago, and New Orleans. In Los Angeles, the “Operation Trojan Horse” effort resulted in more than 5,000 arrests, while “Operation Midway Blitz” in Chicago led to over 3,000 arrests. Bovino often deployed alongside agents in person, tangling with pro-illegal immigrant agitators hand-to-hand.

His departure follows his removal earlier this year from leading immigration enforcement activities in Minnesota. There, he had been collaborating with then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on a major operation that faced stiff resistance from anti-ICE agitators, two of whom, Alex Pretti and Renee Good, were fatally shot by federal agents during confrontations. Following these incidents, White House Border Czar Tom Homan replaced both Bovino and Noem in overseeing the Minnesota efforts, which were rapidly wound down, seemingly in deference to the demonstrators and state Democrats.

Bovino began his career in the El Centro Sector of California in 1996, and he currently holds the position of chief patrol agent there. He has not shared any details about his plans after leaving the agency.

Image by Chad Davis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The BBC Wants Trump’s Defamation Suit Dismissed on a Technicality.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The BBC has filed a motion in a U.S. court to dismiss President Donald J. Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over a documentary that edited his January 6, 2021, speech, claiming that because the film never aired in Florida, the court has no jurisdiction.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The BBC, President Donald J. Trump, and the Southern District of Florida federal court.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in December 2025 in Florida, with a trial date set for February 2027.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Early dismissal is favored given the powerful interest in ensuring that free speech is not unduly burdened by the necessity of defending against expensive yet groundless litigation,” the BBC argued in its motion.

🎯IMPACT: The BBC has subsequently been exposed as having edited other remarks by President Trump and White House officials, raising concerns about editorial impartiality and the truthfulness of media portrayals of political leaders.

IN FULL

The BBC has asked a U.S. court to dismiss a $10 billion lawsuit filed by President Donald J. Trump, arguing that the case could have a “chilling effect” on reporting about public figures. The lawsuit, filed in a Florida court in December 2025, centers on a BBC documentary that edited Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech, splicing together clips of remarks Trump made to create a false narrative of him encouraging violence.

According to the filing, the British broadcaster contends that the Florida court lacks jurisdiction and that Trump failed to demonstrate that the BBC knowingly intended to misrepresent him.

In its 34-page filing, the BBC claims that Trump’s lawsuit “falls well short of the high bar of actual malice” required for a defamation case involving a public figure. The National Pulse reported earlier this month that the broadcaster was caught editing remarks by other Trump administration officials, including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

“Early dismissal is favored given the powerful interest in ensuring that free speech is not unduly burdened by the necessity of defending against expensive yet groundless litigation, which would constrict the breathing space needed to ensure robust reporting on public figures and events,” attorneys for the BBC state.

The documentary, titled Trump: A Second Chance?, aired shortly before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. It spliced together segments of Trump’s January 6 speech, omitting his call for peaceful demonstrations, and appeared to depict him encouraging supporters to storm the Capitol. Trump’s lawsuit accuses the BBC of defamation and unfair trade practices, seeking $5 billion in damages for each claim.

Last November, the BBC admitted its editing gave “the impression of a direct call for violent action,” leading to apologies from its chairman and the resignations of its top executive and head of news. However, the broadcaster denies defaming Trump and maintains that the lawsuit threatens freedom of speech. A federal judge has tentatively scheduled the trial for February 2027.

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.