Thursday, September 3, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 14: Michael Cohen, The MeidasTouchers, And a 14-Year-Old!?

The 14th day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based trial was exclusively dedicated to the defense’s cross-examination of the disbarred serial perjurer Michael Cohen. On Wednesday, Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, Robert Costello, testified before Congress that his old client had repeatedly claimed to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump. With most of his Tuesday testimony now in question, Trump’s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, zeroed in on more of Cohen’s lies and hammered the prosecution’s star witness over the shifting details of the disgraced lawyer’s testimony.

COHEN GETS MEIDAS TOUCHED.

The morning started with a muddled exchange about when Cohen found out about Bragg’s indictment against former President Trump. Judge Juan Merchan later sidelined much of the questioning and testimony surrounding this as attorneys on both sides struggled to clarify the timeline of events.

Next, however, Blanche entered into the evidence record a recording of the serial perjurer’s Mea Culpa podcast hosted by the far-left website MeidasTouch. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger objected to the move but was overruled by Judge Merchan.

Cohen can be heard on the podcast recording congratulating Bragg on the Trump indictment. Additionally, Cohen states that he spent countless hours with Bragg. “You never met Alvin Bragg, right?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“Correct,” responded the disgraced lawyer. Again, Blanche, with tightly controlled questioning, elicits another instance where Cohen lied—in this case, to his audience regarding his interactions with the Manhattan District Attorney.

MOTIVATED BY REVENGE. 

The next stage of the Trump defense team’s cross-examination of Michael Cohen focused on the serial perjurer’s possible motivations for testifying against his former boss. Blanche hammered Cohen on the latter’s public statements, celebrating the chance Trump could be sent to prison.

“I truly f**king hope that this man ends up in prison,” Cohen could be heard on a podcast recording played for the jury. The disgraced attorney went on to say: “But revenge is a dish best served cold, and you better believe I want this man to go down and rot inside for what he did to my family.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he had ever said his work with prosecutors had helped get the former President indicted. “I took some credit, yes,” he replied. Trump‘s lead counsel repeated his question. “Yes, that’s what I believe,” responded Cohen.

COHEN CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.

“You continued to call President Trump various names on your podcasts and when you’re even doing CNN interviews, correct?” Blanche asked next, and Cohen admitted he did. Cohen was then presented with his April 21, 2024, TikTok post just before the trial began. In the video, Cohen states he has “mental excitement about the fact that this trial was starting.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he knew a paralegal was monitoring his social media. “That didn’t stop you, did it?” Blanche pressed Cohen. “No, sir,” he replied.

Trump’s defense team hit Cohen hard on both Tuesday and Thursday for his lack of self-control and inability to follow instructions. Blanche’s strategy appears to be to illustrate to jurors that Cohen is motivated only by his own self-perception and selfish desires. Beyond his simply profiting from the trial, Blanche is underscoring that Cohen often acts on his own with disregard for how his actions affect others.

LIES, LIES, AND MORE LIES.

Again taking aim at Cohen’s credibility, Blanche walked the disbarred attorney through multiple past instances where he was proven to have lied before courts, lawyers, and Congress. “Was that oath that you took every single time, so going back to all the depositions, the same oath that you took Monday morning in this courtroom?” Blanche asked, with Cohen responding: “Yes, sir.”

“And each time you met with a federal agent you were told that if you made a false statement that that was a felony, a federal crime, correct?” Blanche continued. Again, Cohen responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche next focused on Cohen’s lies before the House Intelligence Committee in 2017. “There were a couple of different lies?” he asked Cohen, the latter responding: “That’s correct.”

Cohen admitted to Blanche that he had lied under oath to the Congressional committee and lied again when he met with the special counsel in April 2018.

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

Trump’s lead defense counsel pressed further, again trapping Cohen into admitting that he lied because of what he perceived he should do. “You said you were accepting responsibility for those lies, for lying to Congress. But in fact, you repeatedly said — and even said this morning, and even this week — that the reason why you lied was because of your loyalty to President Trump,” Blanche asked.

“I worked with a joint defense agreement, and we crafted the two-page document in order to stay on message — the message we all knew Mr. Trump wanted, including Mr. Trump’s attorney at the time,” Cohen replied. Blanche followed up, asking the disgraced attorney: “So are you saying you’re accepting responsibility or blaming the joint defense agreement?”

Cohen begrudgingly admitted on the stand, “I accepted responsibility, I read it, and I submitted it to the committee.”

UNTRUE VERSUS A LIE.

Blanche grilled Cohen about whether federal prosecutors threatened him or tried to induce him to plead guilty to a series of 2018 tax evasion charges. “Nobody induced you or threatened you to plead guilty, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“As I stated previously, I was provided 48 hours within which to accept the plea, or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife. And I elected to protect my family,” the disgraced lawyer responded. Blanche pressed Cohen again about his characterization of interactions with federal prosecutors.

Cohen responded the second time, “I never denied the underlying facts; I just did not believe that I should have been criminally charged for either of those six offenses.”

Blanche pushed back, asking Cohen if there was a difference between him saying something untrue and stating a lie. “I was using just different terminology,” Cohen replied.

“So it was a lie?” Blanche asked. Cohen responded: “Correct.”

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

Much of Blanche’s cross-examination of Cohen seems to be setting up Robert Costello as — possibly — the singular defense witness. Costello is Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney who has, in recent days, told both Congress and several media outlets that his former client is lying on the stand.

The questioning regarding Cohen’s interactions with federal prosecutors is especially pertinent as Costello testified before Congress directly on conversations he had with his client about the federal tax charges. On Wednesday, The National Pulse reported that Costello said: “I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week.” He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,’” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

LYING TO A FEDERAL JUDGE.

Trump’s lead defense counsel next addressed Cohen and the fact that the disbarred lawyer had lied to a federal judge. “You testified under oath at a different trial that you did not commit the crimes that you pled guilty to before Judge Pauley, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen, referring to the latter’s perjury before the late U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III.

“Correct,” answered Cohen.

Blanche, citing Cohen’s own words, asked the serial perjurer if it was true that he lied to Judge Pauley because “the stakes affected you personally?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche this was true. Pushing further, Blanche pressed Cohen as to why—during his 2019 testimony before Congress—the disgraced lawyer didn’t tell lawmakers he had lied to the federal judge.

“By not telling Congress or the Senate that you had lied under oath, do you believe that you were omitting important information?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen, and Judge Merchan again overruled the prosecution‘s objection.

“I don’t believe I was asked the question,” Cohen said.

BLAME GAME. 

As the morning’s cross-examination began its final stretch, Blanche focused on Cohen‘s refusal to take responsibility for his actions. “You blame a lot of people over the years for the conduct that you were convicted of,” Blanche told Cohen. The disgraced lawyer responded: “I blame people, yes.”

Blanche proceeded to rattle off a list of people and institutions that Cohen has pointed the finger at for his crimes over the years. These included Cohen’s accountant, bank, federal prosecutors, federal judges, and Donald Trump. Cohen admitted he had blamed each one.

Observers in the courtroom described Cohen as appearing angry and annoyed as Blanche pressed him on every person he’s blamed and his prior convictions for tax evasion and perjury.

A JILTED LAWYER.

Blanche shifted gears again, focusing on the 2016 presidential transition and Cohen’s disappointment at being left behind in New York City. Blanche asked Cohen if it was true that he wanted to serve as the White House chief of staff. “I would have liked to have been considered for ego purpose,” Cohen responded.

After former President Trump tapped Reince Priebus to serve as his chief of staff, Cohen admitted to Blanche that he was disappointed. Blanche then presented Cohen with texts between the latter and his daughter. In the text, Cohen told his daughter that he was with Trump at that very moment and that “he wants me to go, just not sure the position,” insinuating that he’d be joining the President in Washington, D.C.

This line of question is important because, as others have testified, Cohen was not seriously considered for any role in the White House or approached about a role. Blanche likely intended this inquiry to reinforce Cohen’s penchant for lying, even to his own daughter. Additionally, the moment further proved that Cohen has an almost delusional opinion of himself and his actions.

“Did you express disappointment to Pastor Scott repeatedly that President Trump hadn’t brought you into the administration?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen. The prosecution’s witness responded annoyedly: “Not into the administration — I knew the role I wanted… I may have expressed frustration.”

When Blanche pressed Cohen as to why he needed someone to put in a good word for a role in the White House when Cohen claimed he talked to Trump almost every day, the disgraced lawyer said, “It’s always good to have somebody else advocate.”

PRANKED BY A TEENAGER.

Just before the lunch break, Trump‘s defense team took aim at one of the prosecution and Cohen’s key claims. Blanche presented Cohen with a series of text and call logs that Cohen had claimed were him reaching out to Trump regarding the resolution of the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. Trump’s lead counsel contended that rather than reaching out to Trump, Cohen was actually calling Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, for help dealing with a series of harassing phone calls he was receiving from a 14-year-old prankster. The texts between Cohen and Schiller appear to indicate that the latter was indeed the case.

However, Cohen insisted to Blanche that the prankster wasn’t all that he discussed on the calls, stating: “I know that Keith was with Mr. Trump at the time and there was more potentially than this.” A skeptical Blanche, noting the short amount of time over which the texts and calls took place, asked Cohen if he really “had enough time to update Schiller about all the [harassment] problems you were having and also update President Trump about the status of the Stormy Daniels situation because you had to keep him informed?”

“I always ran everything by the boss immediately, and in this case, it would have been saying, ‘Everything has been taken care of — it’s been resolved,'” Cohen responded.

LAWYER OR PR GUY?

The post-lunch cross-examination continued with Blanche pressing Cohen on whether he frequently worked to drive positive stories for Donald Trump. Cohen testified that he would often work place positive stories and that Trump would “blow up” if he failed. At this point, former President Trump visibly shook his head “no” as Cohen spoke.

“It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump because the story that I was going to put out is not the way he would want it. One, it would cause him to blow up at me, and two, it would probably be the end of my job,” Cohen told Blanche. Again, it appears Blanche’s strategy was to portray Cohen as someone who viewed their role as something more ‘connected‘ than it was.

A CAMPAIGN SURROGATE?

In the next series of questions, Cohen was pressed on whether he ever had a role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Former Trump campaign aide Hope Hicks testified earlier in the trial that Cohen was not a part of the campaign but would often try and interfere with the campaign staff.

Cohen testified that while he wasn’t a campaign staff member, he was a “surrogate.” The serial perjurer, however, has not produced any documentation or evidence of this role being in any official capacity.

“Your testimony is the frustration toward you that didn’t come from President Trump; it came from the campaign staffers?” Blanche asked Cohen. He replied, “Correct.”

COHEN FALLS APART.

As the fourteenth day of trial testimony neared its end, Cohen inadvertently may have crushed District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s case. Prosecutors have maintained that the hush money payments were campaign expenditures and not legal fees, as Trump’s only concern was about the Stormy Daniels story’s impact on the 2016 election.

However, when discussing the 2011 blog post marking the first public allegations regarding an affair with Stormy Daniels, Cohen admitted Trump was worried about the impact the story would have on his family. “Fair to say that the first time you heard about that and the story by Ms. Daniels, when you talked to President Trump about it, he said he was worried about what his family would think, correct?” Blanche asked.

“Yes, as well as, of course, for the brand,” Cohen admitted. Blanched continued to press Cohen, addressing his 2021 conversation with law enforcement: “The first thing that President Trump said to you was that his family wouldn’t like that very much?”

“That’s true,” Cohen replied.

After Blanche rehashed additional details of conversations Cohen allegedly had with Trump and other associates, the court adjourned at 4PM with Cohen’s cross-examination set to continue on Monday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Thirteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Treasury Moves to Strip Tax Breaks From Race-Based Private School Programs.

The U.S. Treasury and IRS have proposed regulations to revoke tax-exempt status from private schools engaging in racial discrimination, aligning with President Trump’s executive orders.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is moving to strip federal tax-exempt status from private schools that use race, color, or national or ethnic origin as a factor in admissions, scholarships, educational programs, or other school activities. The U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) proposed regulations Thursday that would make compliance with federal nondiscrimination requirements a condition of maintaining tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3).
📰 DETAIL: Treasury and the IRS estimate the proposal could affect as many as 18,000 private schools, colleges, universities, professional institutions, and trade schools nationwide. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said schools would not be able to avoid the restrictions by labeling race-based policies as diversity, equity, or inclusion (DEI) initiatives, arguing that such terminology does not change the underlying practice. The agencies cited Supreme Court rulings, including Brown v. Board of Education, Bob Jones University v. United States, and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, in support of the proposed standards. Religious schools would still be permitted to maintain their religious missions, curricula, and observance programs, as well as consider genuine religious affiliation as allowed by federal law. Schools could also provide assistance based on race-neutral factors such as household income, geographic location, first-generation status, individual hardship, military-family status, or academic achievement, but would be prohibited from using race or ethnicity to determine eligibility or benefits. The regulations would not take effect immediately and, if finalized, would apply to tax years beginning after May 31, 2027, following a public-comment period.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Schools rebranding race-based preferences as equitable, inclusive, or diversity-enhancing does not change their discriminatory nature.” – Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
🎯 IMPACT: The proposed rule could force thousands of private schools to eliminate race-based admissions, scholarships, and diversity policies or risk losing valuable federal tax benefits. It would further extend the Trump administration’s push to make race-neutral standards the norm in education, potentially prompting significant policy changes across private and religious schools.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The U.S. Treasury and IRS have proposed regulations to revoke tax-exempt status from private schools engaging in racial discrimination, aligning with President Trump's executive orders.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Iran Strikes at U.S. Bases in Kuwait, UAE.

Iran has launched missile and drone strikes on U.S. bases in Kuwait and the UAE, escalating regional tensions following reported U.S. bombings in southern Iran.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Iran continued launching strikes against U.S. military installations and American allies in the Middle East on Thursday, despite the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announcing the previous day that its own bombing campaign had ended. Iranian officials said the latest attacks targeted U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), while Kuwait confirmed that its territory came under a wave of Iranian missile and drone attacks before dawn.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The continuation of these brazen assaults reflects a hostile approach and constitutes a dangerous escalation that threatens the security and stability of the region,” Kuwait’s Ministry of Defense stated.
📺 DETAIL: Kuwait’s Defense Ministry said its air defenses intercepted the incoming weapons and condemned what it called a “blatant Iranian aggression,” while the country’s foreign ministry warned that the attacks represented a dangerous escalation and reserved Kuwait’s right to respond. Iran’s military claimed its forces struck communications systems, equipment storage facilities, and aircraft hangars at Ahmad al-Jaber Air Base in Kuwait, as well as troop deployment areas and radar systems at Al Minhad Air Base in the UAE, although the extent of any damage has not been independently verified. The renewed attacks came as Iranian authorities reported that 18 people had been killed and more than 140 wounded in Iran since August 30. Meanwhile, uncertainty remains over the future of the broader conflict, with reports indicating President Donald J. Trump is considering whether to formally declare the war over while U.S.-Iran negotiations remain stalled.
🎯 IMPACT: The continued Iranian attacks demonstrate that the conflict remains volatile despite the U.S. declaration that its bombing operation has ended, raising the risk of a wider regional confrontation involving American forces and key U.S. allies. Continued strikes could also disrupt energy markets, increase pressure on U.S. military resources, and complicate President Trump’s efforts to end the war ahead of the November midterm elections.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Iran has launched missile and drone strikes on U.S. bases in Kuwait and the UAE, escalating regional tensions following reported U.S. bombings in southern Iran.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

State-Owned Channel 4 Admits to Knowing Anti-Reform ‘Undercover Reporters’ Are Net Zero Political Activists.

Channel 4 has admitted to knowing that the so-called “undercover reporters” behind a recent anti-Reform investigation are foreign-funded climate activists, raising concerns about the state-owned broadcaster’s impartiality.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: State-owned British broadcaster Channel 4 admitted to portraying foreign-funded net zero activists as “undercover reporters” in a recent investigation into Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party.
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse Raheem Kassam posted a video to X (formerly Twitter) of Channel 4’s press office admitting by phone call that “Verbatim Investigations,” ostensibly a group of independent undercover reporters, are the “same people” as the Center for Climate Reporting, an activist group that supports net zero. Channel 4’s press office stated that the investigation was brought to the broadcaster by Verbatim Investigations, rather than conceived by the broadcaster itself. The broadcaster also stated that it was aware of chief investigator Lawrence Carter’s involvement in the organization. Carter previously headed Unearthed, the investigations wing of Greenpeace, and was at one point arrested for breaking into and occupying a power station. He later co-founded the Centre for Climate Reporting (CCR). As uncovered by Kassam on Thursday, Carter incorporated Verbatim Investigations in early July after its activists posed as prospective donors to Reform as part of a report for Channel 4. Significantly, Carter shares the same office address as Reform Watch Ltd, an anti-Reform activist group. The CCR is funded by several grant-making organizations, including the KR Foundation, a Denmark-based organization that also funds the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, a pro-censorship group. Leaders of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform in the United States Congress wrote to Carter back in 2021 for publishing a “substantially edited” and “incomplete record” of a conversation between him and an employee of American oil and gas company ExxonMobil.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Yeah, no, we are aware they’re the same people.Channel 4, responding to questions on whether the broadcaster was aware of Carter’s links to the CCR
🎯 IMPACT: The recent Channel 4 story on Reform demonstrates Carter’s ongoing use of subterfuge combined with the selective editing that saw him rebuked by Congress. The fact that Channel 4 chose to run a report it knew was conducted by an ideologically motivated organization is likely to cast further doubt on Channel 4’s impartiality and the crediblity of its reporting, especially when it concerns matters related to Nigel Farage and Reform. 

Image by Oxfordmale.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Channel 4 has admitted to knowing that the so-called "undercover reporters" behind a recent anti-Reform investigation are foreign-funded climate activists, raising concerns about the state-owned broadcaster's impartiality.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: Monthly Layoffs Hit Four-Year Low.

Layoffs in the U.S. have dropped to their lowest level since 2022, but hiring remains sluggish, raising concerns about economic momentum.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Layoffs in the United States hit a four-year low in August, according to new data.
📺 DETAIL: Layoffs across the U.S. in August fell to their lowest level in four years, according to a report by Challenger, Gray & Christmas, with employers announcing 52,881 job cuts, a 38 percent decrease compared to the same month in 2025. However, despite this positive trend, hiring activity has not kept pace, raising questions about the broader health of the labor market. The consumer products industry led August’s job cuts with over 10,000 layoffs, followed by the food and technology sectors. Over the first eight months of the year, technology firms accounted for more than 155,000 layoffs, driven primarily by restructuring and economic conditions rather than by artificial intelligence (AI), which many fear is driving layoffs in sectors such as tech.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “What we’d like to see with low layoffs is an increase in hiring activity,” said Andy Challenger, Chief Revenue Officer at Challenger, Gray & Christmas. “It doesn’t appear those positions are being filled quickly.”
🎯 IMPACT: While the reduction in layoffs suggests economic resilience, the lack of robust hiring may signal lingering uncertainty among employers. However, it may also signal that the Trump administration’s immigration restrictions are effectively restraining foreign recruitment, which filled a majority of new jobs under the Biden government.

Image by G. Edward Johnson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Layoffs in the U.S. have dropped to their lowest level since 2022, but hiring remains sluggish, raising concerns about economic momentum.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Indians Face 179-Year Green Card Wait Following Trump’s Immigration Reforms.

The U.S. green card backlog has reached 1.2 million applicants, with Indian nationals facing unprecedented wait times due to federal immigration caps.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Indians seeking U.S. green cards now face wait times as long as 179 years due to federal caps on annual green card issuances and country-specific limits. The backlog has reached 1.2 million applicants, with countries like India and China experiencing the longest delays.
📺 DETAIL: U.S. immigration law limits green card issuances to 140,000 annually, with no more than seven percent allocated to any single country. This disproportionately affects applicants from populous nations like India and China, who can face decades-long wait times for approval. For Indian nationals with EB-2 status (advanced degree professionals), the wait time is estimated at 179 years, while Chinese applicants face waits of 25 years. In contrast, workers from the Philippines often wait only a few months.
💬 KEY QUOTE:We don’t need these tech workers. These employment visa programs that have led to this logjam have negatively impacted American innovation and inventiveness. … If you don’t want to be in that backlog, don’t come to the United States, don’t participate.” – Kevin Lynn, executive director of the Institute for Sound Policy
📺 FLASHBACK: The Trump administration’s immigration policies, including caps on H-1B visas and proposed fee increases, have tightened up the legal immigration process. Democrat politicians in Congress and elsewhere have been pushing back against the changes, despite their positive impact on the American workers whose value and bargaining power are reduced by large inflows of immigrant workers.

Image by unlistedsightings.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The U.S. green card backlog has reached 1.2 million applicants, with Indian nationals facing unprecedented wait times due to federal immigration caps.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Captures Illegal Immigrant with Two-Decade History of Crime.

The arrest highlights ongoing efforts by ICE to remove criminal illegal aliens and ensure public safety in U.S. communities.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested a 55-year-old illegal alien from the Philippines whose criminal history in the United States spans two decades. Jaime Tan Francisco was taken into ICE custody on August 2, roughly one week after Las Vegas police arrested him on charges including domestic battery, attempted arson, drug possession, resisting an officer, and possession of drug paraphernalia.
📺 DETAIL: Acting ICE Director David Venturella said Francisco first entered the United States through Detroit, Michigan, in April 2000, and was authorized to remain only until October 26 of that year, meaning he subsequently spent nearly 26 years in the country illegally. His arrest comes as the Trump administration has dramatically expanded immigration enforcement, with ICE recording a record 50,925 arrests in August, including illegal aliens convicted of crimes ranging from murder and DUI manslaughter to child pornography and fentanyl trafficking.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Criminal illegal aliens are unwelcome in the U.S., and ICE is partnering with state and local police to keep them off our streets and out of our communities,” said Acting ICE Director David Venturella
🎯 IMPACT: Francisco’s case illustrates the Trump administration’s broader effort to identify and remove illegal aliens who have accumulated criminal records while remaining in the country for years. The accelerating pace of ICE arrests, particularly those involving aliens with serious convictions, is likely to intensify the national debate over immigration enforcement, sanctuary policies, and the federal government’s responsibility to prioritize public safety.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The arrest highlights ongoing efforts by ICE to remove criminal illegal aliens and ensure public safety in U.S. communities.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Reform UK Chairman Backs Referendum on Reinstating the Death Penalty.

Reform UK party chairman Lee Anderson has called for a referendum on reinstating the death penalty in Britain, highlighting growing public support while acknowledging the divisive nature of the issue.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Lee Anderson, chairman of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, has expressed his personal support for a referendum on reinstating the death penalty. The Reform chairman clarified that “Nothing on the death penalty will be part of party policy,” however.
📺 DETAIL: Anderson, who also serves as Member of Parliament (MP) for Ashfield, argued in an interview that a majority of British people would vote to bring back the death penalty. Anderson added that he and Farage “differ” on the issue. “We learnt that with the Brexit referendum, it divides the country and gets families falling out with each other. So yes, I would [support a referendum], but it would be divisive, very divisive,” said Anderson. While Farage voiced skepticism over the death penalty due to past miscarriages of justice, he has said he understands “why others take a different point of view.” Anderson cited the Islamist terrorists Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, who murdered off-duty British Army soldier Lee Rigby back in 2013, as examples of the type of criminals who deserve the death penalty. Anderson’s remarks follow polling data from last year showing growing support for the death penalty. According to More in Common, a British polling firm, 55 percent of British people favor the reintroduction of capital punishment for certain crimes. Published back in January 2025, the share of Britons who support the restoration of capital punishment has increased from the 50 percent recorded back in 2023. During the same period, opposition fell from 37 percent to 32 percent. Millennials were the most supportive, with 58 percent in favor versus 27 percent opposed.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “People say, ‘Oh, Nigel doesn’t agree with the death penalty and you’re divided,’ what a load of b****s that is! This is how out of touch I think Parliament is. I think the public would vote for the death penalty. Parliament would never vote for the death penalty.” – Lee Anderson
🎯 IMPACT: Any move to reinstate the death penalty in Britain would face significant legal challenges, including conflicts with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), a binding international treaty which has been used to block the deportation of foreign criminals and also bars capital punishment. Anderson’s comments underscore the willingness of populist politicians across the West to use direct democracy to gain popular consent for major policy changes. For instance, earlier this week, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the National Rally (RN) party in France, announced several referendum proposals, including reforms to birthright citizenship, welfare access, and the wearing of Islamic veils.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Reform UK party chairman Lee Anderson has called for a referendum on reinstating the death penalty in Britain, highlighting growing public support while acknowledging the divisive nature of the issue.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Man Gets Probation for Plotting to Bomb, Behead ICE Agents.

An Oregon man who plotted to murder ICE agents received probation after a plea deal reduced his charges significantly.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: An Oregon man who was accused of plotting to kill federal immigration agents at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland has been sentenced to three years of probation after reaching a plea agreement. Rayden Tanner Coleman, 19, of Columbia City, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to two counts of unlawful manufacture of a destructive device, while prosecutors dismissed 13 other charges, including first- and second-degree domestic terrorism counts.
📺 DETAIL: Coleman was arrested on February 4 after investigators uncovered a plan to follow ICE agents home from the facility, track them using night-vision equipment, and kill them with homemade explosives before taking their heads as trophies. Authorities said they found surveillance equipment, tactical axes, military-style knives, shovels, Molotov cocktails, and other homemade explosive devices in his vehicle. Court documents also indicate he had been making payments toward an AR-15 rifle. According to an affidavit, Coleman outlined his plans in a manifesto on Discord and attempted to recruit roommates to participate, telling them he was “sick and tired” of immigration enforcement operations and intended to obtain a firearm. He also allegedly discussed killing the father of a friend who worked as a security guard at the ICE facility and later acknowledged during a police interview that he had planned to use Molotov cocktails against federal agents. Coleman was sentenced by Columbia County Circuit Court Judge Michael T. Clarke to 75 days in jail with credit for time served, meaning he will not serve additional time behind bars. The case began after a roommate’s parents alerted police to Coleman’s alleged plans, leading authorities to arrest him during a traffic stop.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I will actively kill any ICE agents killing or kidnapping civilians,” Coleman wrote in a manifesto shared on Discord.
🎯 IMPACT: The three-year probation sentence is likely to fuel criticism over lenient sentences for an alleged plot involving homemade explosives, plans to murder ICE agents, and attempts to recruit others into the scheme. The case could also intensify debate over how aggressively authorities and prosecutors should punish politically motivated threats against federal law enforcement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An Oregon man who plotted to murder ICE agents received probation after a plea deal reduced his charges significantly.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Biden Judge Blocks Push to Deny Birthright Citizenship to the Children of Birth Tourists and ‘Alien Enemies.’

A federal judge has halted President Trump’s executive order aimed at limiting birthright citizenship for the children of alien enemies and birth tourists, claiming it is unconstitutional.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has blocked President Donald J. Trump’s most recent executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship in the United States, declaring it “almost certainly unconstitutional.” Trump’s ‘Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship’ order, signed in August, sought to deny birthright citizenship to the children of “alien enemies,” such as members of designated terrorist organizations, “birth tourists,” and others, after a more expansive order denying birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens was overturned by the Supreme Court.
📰 DETAIL: U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman issued a 35-page ruling against Trump’s August order, referencing a Supreme Court decision from June that blocked a similar 2025 order. The Joe Biden appointee claims that the President’s attempts to alter birthright citizenship through executive orders contradict the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This Court must, once again, preliminarily enjoin enforcement of the President’s most recent attempt to strip the right to citizenship from them,” wrote Judge Boardman.
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling prevents the enforcement of Trump’s order, maintaining the status quo of birthright citizenship for the children of alien enemies and birth tourists. This follows news last month that a State Department task force focused on tackling birth tourism has already revoked over 600 visas.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A federal judge has halted President Trump's executive order aimed at limiting birthright citizenship for the children of alien enemies and birth tourists, claiming it is unconstitutional.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Locals Burn Down Migrant Shanties in City Invaded by Illegal Aliens.

Tensions have escalated in Spain’s North African exclave of Ceuta, while Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is accusing foreign actors of fueling the crisis through so-called disinformation campaigns.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Residents of Spain’s North African exclave of Ceuta tore down and burned makeshift migrant shelters last week as tensions intensified following a massive influx from neighboring Morocco. Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has accused foreign-backed networks of fueling the crisis with so-called disinformation. Demonstrators carrying Spanish flags marched toward beachside migrant camps, chanting “Invaders, expulsion,” as police attempted to prevent clashes between protesters and migrants, according to Spanish media.
📺 DETAIL: The unrest followed the unprecedented influx of more than 72,000 migrants across the Morocco-Ceuta border on July 30 and 31, with Ceuta authorities saying at least 100 people died during the mass crossing. Roughly 5,000 migrants remain in the city. Sánchez said Monday that research by the European Union’s European External Action Service indicates that Russian– and Israeli-linked networks, alongside “far-right” groups, have helped circulate supposedly false claims on social media suggesting migrants who reached Ceuta will be allowed to remain in Spain. The Spanish prime minister said Moscow and Jerusalem were exploiting the crisis to target his government over its positions on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, but provided no further evidence, while both Russia and Israel rejected the allegations. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar accused Sánchez of “lying shamelessly,” while Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also denied Russian involvement.
🎯 IMPACT: The Ceuta crisis is becoming a major test of Spain’s ability to control its borders while maintaining cooperation with Morocco and the European Union’s borderless Schengen system. With thousands of migrants still in the exclave, which lies on the coast of North Africa less than ten miles from the Spanish mainland and has been Spanish since the 1500s, violent clashes and increasingly hostile protests risk deepening political polarization. Sánchez’s allegations of Russian and Israeli involvement will further strain Madrid’s relations with both countries.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Tensions have escalated in Spain's North African exclave of Ceuta, while Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is accusing foreign actors of fueling the crisis through so-called disinformation campaigns.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.