Monday, July 20, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 14: Michael Cohen, The MeidasTouchers, And a 14-Year-Old!?

The 14th day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based trial was exclusively dedicated to the defense’s cross-examination of the disbarred serial perjurer Michael Cohen. On Wednesday, Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, Robert Costello, testified before Congress that his old client had repeatedly claimed to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump. With most of his Tuesday testimony now in question, Trump’s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, zeroed in on more of Cohen’s lies and hammered the prosecution’s star witness over the shifting details of the disgraced lawyer’s testimony.

COHEN GETS MEIDAS TOUCHED.

The morning started with a muddled exchange about when Cohen found out about Bragg’s indictment against former President Trump. Judge Juan Merchan later sidelined much of the questioning and testimony surrounding this as attorneys on both sides struggled to clarify the timeline of events.

Next, however, Blanche entered into the evidence record a recording of the serial perjurer’s Mea Culpa podcast hosted by the far-left website MeidasTouch. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger objected to the move but was overruled by Judge Merchan.

Cohen can be heard on the podcast recording congratulating Bragg on the Trump indictment. Additionally, Cohen states that he spent countless hours with Bragg. “You never met Alvin Bragg, right?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“Correct,” responded the disgraced lawyer. Again, Blanche, with tightly controlled questioning, elicits another instance where Cohen lied—in this case, to his audience regarding his interactions with the Manhattan District Attorney.

MOTIVATED BY REVENGE. 

The next stage of the Trump defense team’s cross-examination of Michael Cohen focused on the serial perjurer’s possible motivations for testifying against his former boss. Blanche hammered Cohen on the latter’s public statements, celebrating the chance Trump could be sent to prison.

“I truly f**king hope that this man ends up in prison,” Cohen could be heard on a podcast recording played for the jury. The disgraced attorney went on to say: “But revenge is a dish best served cold, and you better believe I want this man to go down and rot inside for what he did to my family.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he had ever said his work with prosecutors had helped get the former President indicted. “I took some credit, yes,” he replied. Trump‘s lead counsel repeated his question. “Yes, that’s what I believe,” responded Cohen.

COHEN CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.

“You continued to call President Trump various names on your podcasts and when you’re even doing CNN interviews, correct?” Blanche asked next, and Cohen admitted he did. Cohen was then presented with his April 21, 2024, TikTok post just before the trial began. In the video, Cohen states he has “mental excitement about the fact that this trial was starting.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he knew a paralegal was monitoring his social media. “That didn’t stop you, did it?” Blanche pressed Cohen. “No, sir,” he replied.

Trump’s defense team hit Cohen hard on both Tuesday and Thursday for his lack of self-control and inability to follow instructions. Blanche’s strategy appears to be to illustrate to jurors that Cohen is motivated only by his own self-perception and selfish desires. Beyond his simply profiting from the trial, Blanche is underscoring that Cohen often acts on his own with disregard for how his actions affect others.

LIES, LIES, AND MORE LIES.

Again taking aim at Cohen’s credibility, Blanche walked the disbarred attorney through multiple past instances where he was proven to have lied before courts, lawyers, and Congress. “Was that oath that you took every single time, so going back to all the depositions, the same oath that you took Monday morning in this courtroom?” Blanche asked, with Cohen responding: “Yes, sir.”

“And each time you met with a federal agent you were told that if you made a false statement that that was a felony, a federal crime, correct?” Blanche continued. Again, Cohen responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche next focused on Cohen’s lies before the House Intelligence Committee in 2017. “There were a couple of different lies?” he asked Cohen, the latter responding: “That’s correct.”

Cohen admitted to Blanche that he had lied under oath to the Congressional committee and lied again when he met with the special counsel in April 2018.

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

Trump’s lead defense counsel pressed further, again trapping Cohen into admitting that he lied because of what he perceived he should do. “You said you were accepting responsibility for those lies, for lying to Congress. But in fact, you repeatedly said — and even said this morning, and even this week — that the reason why you lied was because of your loyalty to President Trump,” Blanche asked.

“I worked with a joint defense agreement, and we crafted the two-page document in order to stay on message — the message we all knew Mr. Trump wanted, including Mr. Trump’s attorney at the time,” Cohen replied. Blanche followed up, asking the disgraced attorney: “So are you saying you’re accepting responsibility or blaming the joint defense agreement?”

Cohen begrudgingly admitted on the stand, “I accepted responsibility, I read it, and I submitted it to the committee.”

UNTRUE VERSUS A LIE.

Blanche grilled Cohen about whether federal prosecutors threatened him or tried to induce him to plead guilty to a series of 2018 tax evasion charges. “Nobody induced you or threatened you to plead guilty, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“As I stated previously, I was provided 48 hours within which to accept the plea, or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife. And I elected to protect my family,” the disgraced lawyer responded. Blanche pressed Cohen again about his characterization of interactions with federal prosecutors.

Cohen responded the second time, “I never denied the underlying facts; I just did not believe that I should have been criminally charged for either of those six offenses.”

Blanche pushed back, asking Cohen if there was a difference between him saying something untrue and stating a lie. “I was using just different terminology,” Cohen replied.

“So it was a lie?” Blanche asked. Cohen responded: “Correct.”

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

Much of Blanche’s cross-examination of Cohen seems to be setting up Robert Costello as — possibly — the singular defense witness. Costello is Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney who has, in recent days, told both Congress and several media outlets that his former client is lying on the stand.

The questioning regarding Cohen’s interactions with federal prosecutors is especially pertinent as Costello testified before Congress directly on conversations he had with his client about the federal tax charges. On Wednesday, The National Pulse reported that Costello said: “I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week.” He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,’” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

LYING TO A FEDERAL JUDGE.

Trump’s lead defense counsel next addressed Cohen and the fact that the disbarred lawyer had lied to a federal judge. “You testified under oath at a different trial that you did not commit the crimes that you pled guilty to before Judge Pauley, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen, referring to the latter’s perjury before the late U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III.

“Correct,” answered Cohen.

Blanche, citing Cohen’s own words, asked the serial perjurer if it was true that he lied to Judge Pauley because “the stakes affected you personally?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche this was true. Pushing further, Blanche pressed Cohen as to why—during his 2019 testimony before Congress—the disgraced lawyer didn’t tell lawmakers he had lied to the federal judge.

“By not telling Congress or the Senate that you had lied under oath, do you believe that you were omitting important information?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen, and Judge Merchan again overruled the prosecution‘s objection.

“I don’t believe I was asked the question,” Cohen said.

BLAME GAME. 

As the morning’s cross-examination began its final stretch, Blanche focused on Cohen‘s refusal to take responsibility for his actions. “You blame a lot of people over the years for the conduct that you were convicted of,” Blanche told Cohen. The disgraced lawyer responded: “I blame people, yes.”

Blanche proceeded to rattle off a list of people and institutions that Cohen has pointed the finger at for his crimes over the years. These included Cohen’s accountant, bank, federal prosecutors, federal judges, and Donald Trump. Cohen admitted he had blamed each one.

Observers in the courtroom described Cohen as appearing angry and annoyed as Blanche pressed him on every person he’s blamed and his prior convictions for tax evasion and perjury.

A JILTED LAWYER.

Blanche shifted gears again, focusing on the 2016 presidential transition and Cohen’s disappointment at being left behind in New York City. Blanche asked Cohen if it was true that he wanted to serve as the White House chief of staff. “I would have liked to have been considered for ego purpose,” Cohen responded.

After former President Trump tapped Reince Priebus to serve as his chief of staff, Cohen admitted to Blanche that he was disappointed. Blanche then presented Cohen with texts between the latter and his daughter. In the text, Cohen told his daughter that he was with Trump at that very moment and that “he wants me to go, just not sure the position,” insinuating that he’d be joining the President in Washington, D.C.

This line of question is important because, as others have testified, Cohen was not seriously considered for any role in the White House or approached about a role. Blanche likely intended this inquiry to reinforce Cohen’s penchant for lying, even to his own daughter. Additionally, the moment further proved that Cohen has an almost delusional opinion of himself and his actions.

“Did you express disappointment to Pastor Scott repeatedly that President Trump hadn’t brought you into the administration?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen. The prosecution’s witness responded annoyedly: “Not into the administration — I knew the role I wanted… I may have expressed frustration.”

When Blanche pressed Cohen as to why he needed someone to put in a good word for a role in the White House when Cohen claimed he talked to Trump almost every day, the disgraced lawyer said, “It’s always good to have somebody else advocate.”

PRANKED BY A TEENAGER.

Just before the lunch break, Trump‘s defense team took aim at one of the prosecution and Cohen’s key claims. Blanche presented Cohen with a series of text and call logs that Cohen had claimed were him reaching out to Trump regarding the resolution of the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. Trump’s lead counsel contended that rather than reaching out to Trump, Cohen was actually calling Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, for help dealing with a series of harassing phone calls he was receiving from a 14-year-old prankster. The texts between Cohen and Schiller appear to indicate that the latter was indeed the case.

However, Cohen insisted to Blanche that the prankster wasn’t all that he discussed on the calls, stating: “I know that Keith was with Mr. Trump at the time and there was more potentially than this.” A skeptical Blanche, noting the short amount of time over which the texts and calls took place, asked Cohen if he really “had enough time to update Schiller about all the [harassment] problems you were having and also update President Trump about the status of the Stormy Daniels situation because you had to keep him informed?”

“I always ran everything by the boss immediately, and in this case, it would have been saying, ‘Everything has been taken care of — it’s been resolved,'” Cohen responded.

LAWYER OR PR GUY?

The post-lunch cross-examination continued with Blanche pressing Cohen on whether he frequently worked to drive positive stories for Donald Trump. Cohen testified that he would often work place positive stories and that Trump would “blow up” if he failed. At this point, former President Trump visibly shook his head “no” as Cohen spoke.

“It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump because the story that I was going to put out is not the way he would want it. One, it would cause him to blow up at me, and two, it would probably be the end of my job,” Cohen told Blanche. Again, it appears Blanche’s strategy was to portray Cohen as someone who viewed their role as something more ‘connected‘ than it was.

A CAMPAIGN SURROGATE?

In the next series of questions, Cohen was pressed on whether he ever had a role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Former Trump campaign aide Hope Hicks testified earlier in the trial that Cohen was not a part of the campaign but would often try and interfere with the campaign staff.

Cohen testified that while he wasn’t a campaign staff member, he was a “surrogate.” The serial perjurer, however, has not produced any documentation or evidence of this role being in any official capacity.

“Your testimony is the frustration toward you that didn’t come from President Trump; it came from the campaign staffers?” Blanche asked Cohen. He replied, “Correct.”

COHEN FALLS APART.

As the fourteenth day of trial testimony neared its end, Cohen inadvertently may have crushed District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s case. Prosecutors have maintained that the hush money payments were campaign expenditures and not legal fees, as Trump’s only concern was about the Stormy Daniels story’s impact on the 2016 election.

However, when discussing the 2011 blog post marking the first public allegations regarding an affair with Stormy Daniels, Cohen admitted Trump was worried about the impact the story would have on his family. “Fair to say that the first time you heard about that and the story by Ms. Daniels, when you talked to President Trump about it, he said he was worried about what his family would think, correct?” Blanche asked.

“Yes, as well as, of course, for the brand,” Cohen admitted. Blanched continued to press Cohen, addressing his 2021 conversation with law enforcement: “The first thing that President Trump said to you was that his family wouldn’t like that very much?”

“That’s true,” Cohen replied.

After Blanche rehashed additional details of conversations Cohen allegedly had with Trump and other associates, the court adjourned at 4PM with Cohen’s cross-examination set to continue on Monday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Thirteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Gas Prices Surge Past $4 Amid Escalating Iran War.

Gas prices in the United States have risen above $4 per gallon nationally for the first time in over a month, driven by rising oil costs and escalating clashes between the U.S. and Iran.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Gas prices in the United States rose above $4 a gallon again following increased tensions between the U.S. and Iran.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, the national average price for a gallon of gas rose to $4.003, according to data from the American Automobile Association (AAA) Fuel Prices tracker. This represents the first time in over a month that the national average price of gas has exceeded $4. The increase in the price of gas follows renewed clashes between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly over control of the Strait of Hormuz, a virtual chokepoint for international oil and fertilizer exports. Approximately 20 percent of the world’s oil exports travel through the Strait of Hormuz. The average price of gas continues to vary by state, though the data suggests an overall increase. This coincides with an increase in the national average for diesel, which rose to $5.11 on Monday. Significantly, diesel prices affect the cost of goods transported by trucks. The rise in gas prices is a consequence of the rising cost of oil. The cost of Brent crude, the global benchmark, rose to $90.95 per barrel, a 3.2 percent increase, while benchmark U.S. crude oil rose to $84.04, a 2.8 percent increase over the same period.
🎯 IMPACT: Gas prices sharply rose following the outbreak of the Iran War in late February. Prices peaked at $4.56 in May but moderated following news of a memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran in June. This has since unraveled. Rising fuel costs place financial strain on American households, which is likely to exacerbate voter concerns regarding affordability and influence voting decisions as the country prepares for midterm elections in November. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Gas prices in the United States have risen above $4 per gallon nationally for the first time in over a month, driven by rising oil costs and escalating clashes between the U.S. and Iran.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Advises New UK PM: Boost Defense, Expand Oil Drilling.

The U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom has called on the country’s new Prime Minister to prioritize defense spending, particularly on the AUKUS submarine program, and energy security.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom Warren Stephens urged newly-installed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to prioritize funding for the AUKUS nuclear submarine program, a trilateral defense initiative between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Stephens emphasized the importance of sustained investments to transform alliances into effective security measures, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, in a Times article published Sunday. Meanwhile, President Donald J. Trump once again called on Britain to reopen the North Sea to oil and gas drilling over the weekend, writing on Truth Social, hundreds of years of Capacity left, with much not even found yet, and will make the United Kingdom, “Britain pays Norway Billions of Dollars a year to buy its Oil, which they get from a less valuable part of the North Sea — How ridiculous is that!”
📺 DETAIL: The AUKUS program aims to strengthen military alliances by permanently basing British and American nuclear submarines in Australia, training Australian naval crews, and eventually developing a new joint Anglo-Australian class of submarines. Stephens criticized Sir Keir Starmer’s government, which officially came to an end on Monday with Starmer’s formal resignation and Burnham’s appointment as Prime Minister, for its lack of progress on defense, urging Burnham to avoid “backloading” investments and instead focus on immediate, sustained funding to ensure national and allied security. On North Sea drilling, President Trump predicted that it would “make the United Kingdom, from a Poverty Stricken Disaster, to one of the Richest Countries anywhere in the World!”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Now more than ever, we must move beyond the rhetoric of partnership and make the sustained investments that transform alliances from agreements on paper into the living architecture of a free and secure world.” – U.S. Ambassador Warren Stephens
🎯 IMPACT: The AUKUS program is seen as critical to countering growing security threats in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly from China. Failure to prioritize defense spending risks undermining the United Kingdom’s role in the alliance and its broader national security, as well as weakening its standing among key allies like the United States and Australia.
📺 FLASHBACK: The now-former Starmer government faced significant criticism for its failure to address the declining state of Britain’s armed forces, with defense ministers resigning in frustration and the Royal Navy being described as “semi-functional.” This lack of investment has left the United Kingdom’s military capabilities lagging behind its allies and even its own historical standards.

Image by Gary Bembridge.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom has called on the country's new Prime Minister to prioritize defense spending, particularly on the AUKUS submarine program, and energy security.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Andy Burnham Takes Over as UK PM, Announces ‘10-Year Plan for the Country.’

Andy Burnham has assumed the role of British Prime Minister, pledging a 10-year plan to address national challenges.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Labour leader Andy Burnham has become Britain’s Prime Minister after formally accepting the role from King Charles III. Burnham has outlined a “10-year plan for the country” to address economic challenges, including the rising cost of living.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The handover of power occurred at Buckingham Palace, with Burnham formally “kissing hands” with the King to accept the invitation to form a government following the departure of Sir Keir Starmer.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I’m not saying that means I’m setting out to say I’m going to be here for 10 years. It’s more that we’re not in the right place structurally.” – Andy Burnham
🎯 IMPACT: Burnham says his focus will be on providing “breathing room” for families facing economic pressures. His premiership is controversial, as he did not lead the country’s governing Labour Party into the 2024 general election, and was not even elected as a Labour Member of Parliament (MP) in that election. Instead, another Labour MP resigned his seat after the party was routed by Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in local elections in May, allowing Burnham to take it in a parliamentary by-election (special election) and supplant Starmer in an uncontested Labour leadership election. Farage has called for an immediate general election, arguing that Burnham has no democratic mandate nationally. “Andy Burnham cannot be allowed to make the ‘biggest changes in politics for 40 years’ without a mandate,” he stated on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday, reiterating, “We need a general election now.”
📺 DETAIL: Sir Keir Starmer claims he has left the country “stronger and fairer” after just two years in office. Burnham, a longtime MP and government minister under former Labour prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, left Parliament for roughly a decade to become Mayor of Greater Manchester, where he has been accused of taking insufficient action against Muslim grooming gangs by whistleblowers and survivors.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Andy Burnham has assumed the role of British Prime Minister, pledging a 10-year plan to address national challenges.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Denmark Bans Burkas in Schools to Boost Migrant Integration.

Denmark’s government has announced plans to expand its burka ban to educational institutions, continuing its efforts to address “parallel societies” and integration issues.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Danish government has unveiled plans to extend its current ban on burkas and niqabs to schools and universities. This proposal builds on Denmark‘s broader campaign to address “parallel societies,” which officials describe as urban areas dominated by non-Western migrants.
📺 DETAIL: Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen‘s government plans to expand Denmark’s 2018 law, which already prohibits burkas and niqabs in public spaces, with legislation expected to be introduced after the Danish parliament reconvenes. The proposal targets communities where authorities say non-Western migrants have become socially isolated, and repeat violations of the existing public-face covering ban can already result in fines of up to $1,570. Denmark has long maintained some of Europe’s toughest immigration and asylum policies, admitting fewer asylum seekers than neighboring countries during the 2015 migration crisis while limiting benefits for unsuccessful applicants. The country also enforces laws that allow the authorities to redevelop neighborhoods with high concentrations of foreign-born residents and, under certain circumstances, to confiscate valuables from asylum seekers to help cover their accommodation costs. The proposed expansion follows recent government plans to examine whether banning the Islamic call to prayer would be legally permissible.
💬 KEY QUOTE:The call to prayer should not be heard over Danish rooftops. It has no place in Denmark, and you shouldn’t be in any doubt whether you’ve ended up in a suburb of Islamabad when you walk around Denmark.” – Morten Bodskov, Social Democrats

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Denmark's government has announced plans to expand its burka ban to educational institutions, continuing its efforts to address "parallel societies" and integration issues.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Warns States Must Scrub Voter Rolls to Get Federal Grants.

The Department of Homeland Security has warned that states must comply with mandatory election security measures, including voter roll scrubbing, to qualify for federal grants.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that states must adhere to SAVE America Act measures in order to continue receiving federal grant funding.
📺 DETAIL: On Friday, Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin declared that states must cooperate with the SAVE election integrity program at DHS. The SAVE program involves states partnering with DHS to scrub voter rolls. This follows a speech delivered by President Donald J. Trump on Thursday, ordering DHS to “notify every state about noncitizens on their voter rolls and direct them to remove all ineligible voters from the lists immediately.” Mullin warned that failure to comply would result in suspension of DHS grant funding. Mullin revealed that DHS identified over 250,000 noncitizens registered to vote in just four states (California, Nevada, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania). Mullin emphasized the importance of ensuring only eligible voters are on voter rolls ahead of elections. “We need to make sure that individuals that are legally able to vote are voting,” said Mullin during a press conference.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Election security is national security… Only Americans should be electing American leaders,” posted Markwayne Mullin on X (formerly Twitter).
🎯 IMPACT: The move signals increased pressure from the federal government to ensure states take election integrity seriously. By linking grant funding to security measures, DHS can ensure voter rolls are accurate. This decision could provide an incentive to reduce vulnerabilities and restore public confidence in the democratic process.
📺 FLASHBACK: President Trump delayed the signing of a congressional bill that places explicit restrictions on Wall Street investors buying single-family homes to focus on passing the SAVE America Act. The Act has faced obstruction from Democrats in Congress, despite the fact that Americans overwhelmingly support election integrity measures, such as voter ID. Noncitizens voting in U.S. elections has become a significant problem. For example, back in May, DHS arrested a Canadian national for voting illegally in U.S. elections since 2008.

Image by Joe Mabel.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Homeland Security has warned that states must comply with mandatory election security measures, including voter roll scrubbing, to qualify for federal grants.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Threatens Canada With Tariffs Over Wildfire Pollution.

President Trump has criticized Canada for failing to manage its forests, linking wildfire smoke affecting U.S. cities to Canadian negligence, and threatening increased tariffs.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has threatened to impose additional tariffs on Canada, accusing the country of negligence in managing its forests and allowing wildfire smoke to blanket U.S. cities. Trump made the comments on Truth Social, citing the smoke as “filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air” that is affecting millions of Americans.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The smoke, originating from wildfires in Ontario, Canada, has affected air quality across over a dozen U.S. states and Washington, D.C.
📺 DETAIL: Smoke from the Ontario wildfires blanketed cities including Washington, D.C., New York City, Chicago, and Detroit, while the National Weather Service issued air quality alerts across at least 16 states. The Environmental Protection Agency classified air quality as hazardous in parts of the Upper Midwest, warning that fine particulate pollution poses serious health risks, particularly for people with heart and lung conditions. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said thousands of Canadians have been displaced or otherwise affected by the ongoing wildfires, which continue to burn across several regions. The latest dispute threatens to further strain U.S.-Canada relations, which have already been tested by trade disagreements. Significantly, the smoke contains dangerous PM2.5 particles and chemicals such as benzene and formaldehyde, which can increase the risk of respiratory illness, heart problems, and other serious health effects. Michigan has experienced some of the worst air quality from the smoke, with forecasters saying conditions reached the state’s worst levels since modern recordkeeping began in the early 2000s.
💬 KEY QUOTE:We are holding Canada responsible for the fact that they are not properly maintaining their forests and brush.” – President Trump 
📺 FLASHBACK: This marks the fourth consecutive year of record wildfires in Canada, which Trump and his allies argue demonstrates a failure of liberal governance and environmental policy.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has criticized Canada for failing to manage its forests, linking wildfire smoke affecting U.S. cities to Canadian negligence, and threatening increased tariffs.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Arrests Hit Record Average of 1,400 a Day This Month.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) daily arrests reached record levels in July, despite ongoing attempts by the left to curb their activities.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have reached an average of more than 1,400 arrests per day, according to agency data.
📺 DETAIL: On Friday, it was revealed that ICE achieved President Donald J. Trump’s target of 2,000 arrests per day across several days in July. Throughout the first 12 days of July, ICE averaged 1,433 arrests. This surge follows a period of reduced operations earlier this year after backlash over high-profile shootings involving ICE agents and pro-illegal immigrant agitators. This also follows the 39,500 arrests made by ICE during June, which broke previous records for the administration, amounting to 1,319 arrests per day. President Trump aims to deport one million illegal immigrants per year, equivalent to approximately 2,800 arrests a day. The data from ICE was first revealed to The Washington Post. Daily arrests have increased despite fatal shootings of migrants accused of weaponizing their vehicles in Biddeford, Maine, and Houston, Texas, in recent days.
🎯 IMPACT: If the arrest rate continues, ICE will make more than 44,000 arrests by the end of the month. The record-breaking arrest numbers highlight the administration’s reintensified immigration enforcement. This data represents an increase from the 1,164 arrests per day in January, 1,025 daily arrests in February, and 954 daily arrests in March, the lowest point of the year. This dip in arrests coincided with the fatal shootings in Minneapolis of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. In March, the President fired Kristi Noem as Secretary of Homeland Security and replaced her with Markwayne Mullin. The sustained increase in daily arrests also coincides with President Trump’s defense and subsequent reinstatement of traffic stops. “We CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP,” posted the President on Truth Social earlier this week.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) daily arrests reached record levels in July, despite ongoing attempts by the left to curb their activities.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Farage Challenges Incoming UK PM Burnham to Call Immediate General Election.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called for an immediate general election, arguing that new Labour Party leader and incoming British Prime Minister Andy Burnham lacks a mandate to govern the country.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, has called for a general election following Andy Burnham’s confirmation as leader of the governing Labour Party.
📺 DETAIL: On Friday, Andy Burnham, the Labour Member of Parliament (MP) for Makerfield, was officially declared leader of the governing Labour Party. This followed a leadership process in which Burnham ran for the leadership uncontested. This was despite the fact that the British public wanted a contest to hold the incoming Prime Minister to account. Burnham will officially become Prime Minister on Monday. Following his confirmation as leader, Burnham delivered a speech signaling that the Labour government would move much further to the left. In response, Farage criticized Burnham for lacking a mandate to serve as Prime Minister, noting that his leadership stems from internal party mechanisms and the Makerfield by-election (special election) rather than a general election. “He says he wants to have the biggest change of direction in politics in 40 years, [but] outside of 25,000 voters in Makerfield he has literally no mandate for this at all,” said Farage at an event in London. It has been noted before that Burnham was neither leader of the Labour Party nor a parliamentary candidate at the last general election, when Labour reclaimed a parliamentary majority for the first time in 14 years. Farage expressed skepticism about Burnham’s ability to address key issues, such as the cost of living and the country’s border crisis. The Reform leader warned that a Burnham premiership would lead to tax hikes and lax immigration policies. Farage concluded by predicting that Britain risks “turning into a third world country” over the next ten years and called for “an immediate general election.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I believe the British people have simply had enough of weak, gutless, spineless leadership that cares more about opinion in the international community than it cares about the collective good of the people living in this country.” – Nigel Farage.
🎯 IMPACT: The Labour government is technically not obligated to hold an election until August 15, 2029, although unlike in the U.S., it has broad discretion to call one early. Reform has made significant gains since it swept the local elections back in May, which returned a catastrophic result for the governing Labour Party. This led to the resignation of outgoing Labour Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the Makerfield parliamentary by-election (special election), which allowed Burnham, formerly Mayor of Greater Manchester, to return to Parliament and replace him. If a general election is called, Reform are expected to make similarly remarkable gains, as support for the two main parties, namely Labour and the formerly governing Conservatives, continues to collapse.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called for an immediate general election, arguing that new Labour Party leader and incoming British Prime Minister Andy Burnham lacks a mandate to govern the country.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Farage’s Reform Party Secures First-of-a-Kind Election Victory.

Colin Sutton, a former detective for London’s Metropolitan Police, has been elected as Norfolk’s Police and Crime Commissioner, marking a significant milestone for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has won its first Police and Crime Commissioner election.
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, Norfolk, a county in East England, held a Police and Crime Commissioner by-election (special election). Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) are directly elected officials in England and Wales responsible for overseeing local police forces. On Friday, Reform’s Colin Sutton, a former detective, emerged victorious, becoming Reform’s first elected PCC. Sutton secured 32,647 votes, constituting approximately 27 percent of the vote, and won a majority of 14,299 over the Conservatives, who secured second with 18,348 votes. The marks a 19 percent decrease in the party’s share of the vote. Similarly, the Labour Party plummeted to fifth place after losing roughly 24 percent of their vote share compared to the last election. The candidate for Rupert Lowe‘s Restore Britain party came sixth with 13,319 votes, less than half of the votes secured by Reform.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I’m overjoyed. Policing has been my life and it is the best job. I believe I can make a difference and make things better,” said Sutton after his victory.
🎯 IMPACT: Sutton’s victory represents a significant milestone for Reform, which now holds its first PCC position through an election rather than party-switching. However, due to plans to create a directly elected mayor for Norfolk, who will take over the PCC’s powers, Sutton’s ability to impact local policing may be limited. Nevertheless, the results reflect a continuing trend of British voters abandoning the two main establishment parties in the United Kingdom, namely Labour and the Conservatives, and shifting towards Nigel Farage and Reform. The comfortable victory for Reform also shows the limited impact of Restore Britain, an Elon Musk-backed splinter faction of Reform, despite its ongoing attempts to supplant Reform as the main anti-establishment party on the right. Sutton’s victory also represents a continuing trend of Reform winning local by-elections since the local elections back in May.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Colin Sutton, a former detective for London's Metropolitan Police, has been elected as Norfolk's Police and Crime Commissioner, marking a significant milestone for Nigel Farage's Reform UK party.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Drops BBC Studios From Defamation Lawsuit.

President Donald J. Trump has dropped BBC Studios from a defamation lawsuit against the British public broadcaster, but continues to pursue claims against the BBC over the deceptive editing of a 2024 Panorama episode.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has removed BBC Studios from his defamation lawsuit against Britain’s state-backed public broadcaster, but is continuing a $10 billion claim against the BBC over a 2024 Panorama episode. The lawsuit alleges that the program “intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively” edited a Trump speech to misrepresent his remarks about the January 6, 2021, Capitol protests, splicing together remarks made roughly an hour apart to make it look as though he was inciting violence.
📺 DETAIL: Court records related to the lawsuit, filed in Florida, confirm the BBC Studios entities were dismissed from the proceedings after arguing they played no role in producing or distributing the program in the United States. The BBC has acknowledged a supposed editing “error” that created the mistaken impression that Trump directly called for violent action, but maintains the documentary does not meet the legal standard for defamation and was not distributed on its U.S. platforms. Trump’s legal team argues the case should be decided by a jury, noting that the BBC’s geo-blocking measures did not effectively prevent American viewers from accessing the program and that the broadcaster actively promoted it to U.S. audiences. The President’s lawyers also contend that BBC staff provided instructions on how viewers in the United States could watch the documentary despite regional restrictions. The U.S. government has indicated it is considering participating in the litigation after the BBC sought information from several federal agencies through subpoenas. If the case proceeds, a trial will be scheduled for February 2027.
🎯 IMPACT: The case sparked significant controversy, as the BBC is required to be impartial. While it is widely acknowledged that left-wing bias at the broadcaster is endemic regardless, the doctoring of Trump’s speech was so egregious that it led to the resignations of key BBC figures such as Director General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness.

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has dropped BBC Studios from a defamation lawsuit against the British public broadcaster, but continues to pursue claims against the BBC over the deceptive editing of a 2024 Panorama episode.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.