The individual responsible for attacking multiple people at an anti-Islamization rally in the German city of Mannheim on Friday has been identified as Sulaiman A., a 25-year-old Afghan migrant. A graphic video of the attack shows the Afghan national and resident of Hesse attacking people at a rally against Islamist extremism organized by the Citizens’ Movement Pax Europa (BpE), described as a counter-jihad group.
Multiple people attempted to restrain the attacker, including a police officerwho appeared to be stabbed in the neck while trying to bring the attacker to the ground. A second police officer then shot the suspect, wounding him.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has raised the possibility that the attack could be Islamist-motivated. “If the investigations reveal an Islamist motive, this would be a further confirmation of the great danger posed by Islamist acts of violence,” she said in a statement.
The National Pulse has previously reported that migrants in Germany have been the source of a wave of violent crime. Recent data disclosed by Germany‘s Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) revealed that foreign migrants, who account for just 14.6 percent of the country’s population, were implicated in 58.5 percent of all violent crimes in the country.
Meanwhile, the German Interior Ministry has confirmed that the number of foreign criminal suspects surged to approximately 923,000 in 2023, a rise of almost a fifth year over year.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Lord Peter Mandelson, the Jeffrey Epstein-linked former British ambassador to the United States, was taken from his London home by plain-clothed police officers on Monday.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lord Mandelson, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and the British authorities.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday afternoon, at Mandelson’s home in London, England.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I am beyond being furious and appalled… To think that he was leaking the information to Epstein so he could help rich Americans make money on the UK government’s actions,” Member of Parliament (MP) Emily Darlington said of Mandelson earlier this month.
🎯IMPACT: The Mandelson scandal renews scrutiny on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Britain’s governing Labour Party, which appointed Mandelson as ambassador despite his friendship with Epstein being public knowledge.
IN FULL
Lord Peter Mandelson, the former British ambassador to the U.S. linked to Jeffrey Epstein, was escorted from his London home by plain-clothed police officers on Monday afternoon. The Metropolitan Police later confirmed that “Officers have arrested a 72-year-old man on suspicion of misconduct in public office.”
Earlier this month, police officers raided properties associated with Mandelson in both Wiltshire and central London, after Epstein files released by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) indicated that he had been leaking confidential information to Epstein when he was a member of Cabinet under former Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
The scandal around Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to appoint Mandelson as ambassador, despite his friendship with Epstein being public knowledge, has steadily worsened. Mandelson had to leave the post only months after his appointment, which had been opposed by many prominent public figures, including The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam.
“[T]he idea that Keir Starmer, the current Prime Minister, would shove somebody like Lord Mandelson into the embassy in D.C. and expect him to be taken seriously is a great affront to President Trump, it’s a great affront to the American public and what they voted for,” Kassam told the late Charlie Kirk on his show in January 2025, a full year before the current scandal broke.
Notably, Starmer appointed Mandelson to the key diplomatic post despite the fact that he had previously branded President Donald J. Trump a “danger to the world” and “little short of a white nationalist and a racist.”
Several Members of Parliament (MPs) for Starmer’s Labour Party have taken their grievances over the scandal public, with Emily Darlington MP complaining, “I am beyond being furious and appalled… To think that he was leaking the information to Epstein so he could help rich Americans make money on the UK government’s actions.”
The fallout has already led to the ouster of Starmer’s now-former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who was involved in Mandelson’s vetting for the ambassador role.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has permanently barred the release of former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigation into President Donald J. Trump’s handling of classified documents.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, former Special Counsel Jack Smith, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, and Department of Justice (DOJ) officials.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was made on Monday, February 23, 2026, by Judge Cannon, who presides in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Special Counsel Smith, acting without lawful authority, obtained an indictment in this action and initiated proceedings that resulted in a final order of dismissal of all charges.” — Judge Cannon.
🎯IMPACT: The ruling prevents the DOJ from releasing the report, citing “manifest injustice” to Trump and his co-defendants.
IN FULL
Former Biden government special counsel Jack Smith‘s report on the findings from his classified documents probe of President Donald J. Trump will not be released. U.S. Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who ruled in July 2024 that Smith’s appointment to special counsel was unconstitutional, determined that the release of the report—which was never fully litigated in court and contains only allegations leveled by Smith—could do potential “irreparable harm” to President Trump and his former co-defendants.
In her ruling, Judge Cannon stated that releasing the report would constitute a “manifest injustice” and reiterated that Smith’s appointment as special counsel was “unlawful.” Smith moved to drop both of his prosecutions of Trump following the November 2024 presidential election, after wasting an estimated $50 million in taxpayer dollars trying to convict him.
“Special Counsel Smith, acting without lawful authority, obtained an indictment in this action and initiated proceedings that resulted in a final order of dismissal of all charges,” Cannon wrote, adding, “As a result, the former defendants in this case, like any other defendant in this situation, still enjoy the presumption of innocence held sacrosanct in our constitutional order.”
Attorneys for the President argued that releasing the report would be “inherently biased,” as the allegations in the document were never fully challenged or litigated in court. Meanwhile, Smith himself is facing accusations that he overstepped his investigatory mandate—targeting members of Congress and Republican Party election organizations—in his January 6 investigation.
The National Pulse reported in late January of this year that Smith told lawmakers he expected to be indicted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for his actions during the two Biden-era Trump probes. Smith is accused of circumventing constitutional safeguards and using favorable judges to secure subpoenas for phone records belonging to Republican lawmakers.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Green Party released a video of their candidate, Hannah Spencer, speaking in Urdu to appeal to voters in the Gorton and Denton parliamentary by-election (special election) in England.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hannah Spencer, the Green Party candidate, and local activists.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The video was released ahead of the parliamentary by-election in Gorton and Denton, England, taking place on February 26, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The Reforms want to break up our communities. They want to deport families who have lived here for years, and they want to tax people born abroad even more. They give air to Islamophobia, and they put our safety and dignity at risk. But there is another way,” the ad declared, referring to Nigel Farage’s Reform Party and its candidate, Matt Goodwin.
🎯IMPACT: The Greens, a formerly marginal far-left party focused on environmentalism, are increasingly displacing the governing Labour Party on the British left as they court ethnic minorities and pro-Palestinian activists.
IN FULL
Britain’s Green Party has released a video featuring its candidate, Hannah Spencer, speaking in Urdu—the predominant lingua franca in Pakistan and among Indian Muslims—to court the Muslim vote in the upcoming Gorton and Denton parliamentary by-election (special election) in Manchester, England. The video prominently features footage from Gaza and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in America, showcasing the Greens’ increasing focus on pro-Palestinian, anti-borders rhetoric over environmentalism.
“A cruel politician can win if we don’t vote Green to stop the Reforms,” the video states, referring to Nigel Farage’s Reform Party and its candidate Matt Goodwin. “The Reforms want to break up our communities. They want to deport families who have lived here for years, and they want to tax people born abroad even more. They give air to Islamophobia, and they put our safety and dignity at risk. But there is another way,” it continues.
The video directly targets Farage and Goodwin alongside President Donald J. Trump and WarRoom host and former White House Chief Strategist Stephen K. Bannon.
The Green Party has a long history in Britain but has been marginal for decades. Historically, it opposed mass migration on the grounds that an expanding population was harmful to the environment. In recent years, however, its focus on climate change and environmental issues has been increasingly taking a backseat to economic socialism and pro-Palestinian, anti-border enforcement politics, allowing it to significantly grow its support among the country’s growing ethnic minority population and left-wing university students.
Polls suggest the Greens are increasingly displacing Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party on the British left, as Reform has displaced the formerly governing Conservatives (Tories). The party’s pitch to Muslim voters has been a major part of this, with previous by-election campaign ads urging Muslims to “punish Labour for Gaza,” with Starmer framed as not sufficiently supportive of the Palestinians.
The Gorton and Denton by-election is scheduled for February 26, 2026, with Reform and the Greens regularly at or near the top of the polls, signalling a major shift in British politics towards a battle between Farage’s populist, anti-mass migration party and the formerly fringe extreme left.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Members of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) unleashed violent attacks across 20 Mexican states after the death of their leader, Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho”.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The CJNG, Mexican military forces, and local authorities, with support from the U.S. government.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Violence erupted on Sunday across Jalisco, Baja California, Quintana Roo, and other states, following El Mencho’s capture and death during his transport to Mexico City.
💬KEY QUOTE: “El Mencho was a top target for the Mexican and United States government as one of the top traffickers of fentanyl into our homeland.” — Trump White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
🎯IMPACT: The violence disrupted daily life, halted public transport, and left tourists stranded, while authorities arrested 25 individuals and worked to restore order.
IN FULL
The Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), one of Mexico’s most notorious criminal cartels, responded with widespread violence after its leader, Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, also known as “El Mencho,” died in Mexican government custody. El Mencho, Mexico’s most wanted man, was captured by military forces in Jalisco state on Sunday and died from injuries sustained during the operation.
In retaliation, CJNG members set up burning blockades, torched businesses, and attacked towns across 20 states. Reports indicate that dozens of banks, pharmacies, and vehicles were set ablaze, with significant disruptions in high tourist areas like Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara. Authorities reported 250 incidents of road blockades, with 90 percent cleared by Monday.
The violence mirrored past cartel responses to high-profile arrests, such as the 2019 capture of Ovidio Guzmán López—the son of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. In Guadalajara, panic erupted at the airport when rumors of gunfire spread, though authorities later clarified no shots were fired inside the terminal. Tourists in Puerto Vallarta were advised to shelter in place, and flights were canceled, leaving hundreds stranded. However, by early Monday morning, it appears the Mexican military has largely retaken both cities, using helicopters and armored vehicles.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum praised the military’s efforts, stating, “In most parts of the country, activities are proceeding normally.” The operation to capture El Mencho involved the Mexican Army, National Guard, and Air Force, with intelligence support from the United States, which had offered a $15 million reward for his capture. “El Mencho was a top target for the Mexican and United States government as one of the top traffickers of fentanyl into our homeland,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said late Sunday on the capture and death of the cartel leader.
The National Pulse previously reported that U.S. President Donald J. Trump has weighed potential ground strikes against Central and South American drug cartels. While action was taken in Venezuela to topple the far-left narco-dictatorship of Nicolás Maduro, the Trump administration has been more hesitant to clear strikes in Mexico.
🚨Brutal clash between riot police and anti-Sheinbaum crowd in Mexico City.
Some in the crowd appeared to have swarmed and knocked out an officer. Police rushed in and one protester was then beaten by police, kicked multiple times in the head. pic.twitter.com/t4L6AQvuBk
❓WHAT HAPPENED: European Union (EU) politicians have decided to pause a new trade deal favorable to the U.S. now that the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned part of President Donald J. Trump’s tariff agenda.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: European Parliament negotiators, President Trump, Supreme Court justices, and various EU politicians.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 2026, in the European Parliament.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The United States must get its trade policy in order, this level of chaos is not serious.” – Karin Karlsbro, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the Swedish Liberals
🎯IMPACT: The approval of the trade deal is delayed as EU seeks clarity on the Supreme Court tariff ruling’s implications.
IN FULL
On Monday, European Union (EU) politicians decided to pause progress on a major trade agreement favorable to the United States after a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that invalidated many of the tariffs previously imposed by President Donald J. Trump. The European Parliament’s trade committee had previously been preparing to approve the elimination of tariffs on American industrial products under the “Turnberry agreement,” named after President Trump’s Scottish golf course.
Parliament negotiators are set to convene Monday afternoon to officially confirm the pause on the agreement, which was reached last year. The chairman of the trade committee, Bernd Lange, requested an urgent meeting and suggested halting legislative efforts on the deal—a proposal that gained support from the European People’s Party (EPP), the largest grouping in the assembly, and others.
Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Zeljana Zovko wants the European Commission, which acts as the EU’s unelected executive, to consider “better option for us to continue with” now following the Supreme Court ruling.
The situation has been complicated further by President Trump’s recent decision to temporarily raise the global import duty to the United States to 15 percent using tariff powers separate to those the Supeme Court ruled against, signaling he has no intention of ceasing to use the import levies to level the playing field for American producers and workers in international trade.
Karin Karlsbro, an EU lawmaker from the liberal Renew group, stated: “We will not be able to vote on the Turnberry agreement until we have full clarity on how the Supreme Court’s ruling affects the tariff arrangement,” adding, “The United States must get its trade policy in order, this level of chaos is not serious.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A man was shot by U.S. Secret Service agents and a deputy after entering a secure perimeter at Mar-a-Lago.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Secret Service agents, a Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office deputy, and an unidentified male.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 22, around 1:30 a.m., at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The incident is under investigation by the FBI, U.S. Secret Service, and the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.”
🎯IMPACT: The involved Secret Service agents are on administrative leave, and no personnel were injured.
IN FULL
On February 22, a male in his early 20s was shot by U.S. Secret Service agents and a deputy from the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office after he entered the secure perimeter at Mar-a-Lago without authorization.
U.S. media identified the alleged gunman as 21-year-old Austin Tucker Martin of North Carolina.
Authorities said he was shot dead by Secret Service agents after raising his weapon into a “shooting position.”
A photograph circulating online originated from a missing person poster shared days earlier by the family of “Tucker Austin Martin” from Moore County, North Carolina.
He was observed near the north gate of the Mar-a-Lago property carrying what appeared to be a shotgun and a fuel can.
The confrontation with law enforcement resulted in shots being fired by the agents and the deputy. Fortunately, no Secret Service or PBSO personnel were injured during the encounter.
At the time of the incident, there were no Secret Service protectees present at Mar-a-Lago. The situation, including the man’s background, motives, and the use of force, is under investigation by the FBI, the U.S. Secret Service, and the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.
In line with agency policy, the Secret Service agents involved have been placed on routine administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Two illegal immigrants were arrested in connection with a violent home invasion in North Carolina that involved kidnapping, sexual assault, and brutal physical attacks.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zaid Mayen, Jonathan David Garcia-Larios, John Carlos Calderon, and an unnamed male victim.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred last Wednesday in a Greenville, North Carolina, suburb.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This is a real-life nightmare. Burglarizing, kidnapping, assaulting, and sodomizing, and ripping off the fingernails of an innocent victim are extremely wicked and heinous.” – Outgoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The suspects face multiple felony charges, and federal authorities have issued detainers against their release.
IN FULL
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed on Thursday that two illegal immigrants from Mexico, Zaid Mayen and Jonathan David Garcia-Larios, were arrested in connection with a violent home invasion in North Carolina. The attack, which occurred last Wednesday in a quiet Greenville suburb, involved the suspects breaking into a male victim’s home, restraining him, and subjecting him to brutal assaults, including sodomy and the removal of his fingernails.
DHS officials described the incident as “a real-life nightmare,” with outgoing Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stating, “Burglarizing, kidnapping, assaulting, and sodomizing, and ripping off the fingernails of an innocent victim are extremely wicked and heinous.” The suspects, aged 21 and 20, were arrested last Friday with assistance from U.S. Marshals and local law enforcement.
The two men, identified as a Chapel Hill resident and a previously deported homeless individual, entered the U.S. at an unknown time and date. DHS emphasized that these individuals had no prior criminal record in the U.S. but committed what the agency described as “horrific attacks.” A third suspect, John Carlos Calderon, was also arrested, though his immigration status remains under investigation.
All three suspects face first-degree felony charges, including forcible sexual assault, kidnapping, burglary, and the use of a deadly weapon with intent to kill causing serious injury. Garcia-Larios and Calderon are held without bond at the Pitt County Detention Center, while Mayen is held without bond at the Orange County Detention Center. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has issued detainers to ensure federal custody of the suspects.
The unnamed victim was transported to a local hospital for treatment and is recovering.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A California law banning federal agents from wearing masks has been blocked by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, California Governor Gavin Newsom (D), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Thursday by the 9th Circuit Court, following a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against California’s ‘No Secret Police Act.’
💬KEY QUOTE: “Law enforcement officers risk their lives for us, only to be doxxed by radical anti-police activists. Unacceptable.” – Pam Bondi
🎯IMPACT: The ruling protects federal agents from the mask ban, ensuring their safety while the court continues to deliberate on the law.
IN FULL
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Trump administration a significant win against California‘s anti-mask law targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Late Thursday, the appellate court handed down a ruling staying the anti-ICE law, championed by Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA), from taking effect as litigation moves forward.
“This crucial ruling protects our brave men and women in the field. We will not stop fighting bad laws like these in California and across the country,” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated following the ruling, noting the federal appeals court issued “a full stay blocking California’s ban on masks for federal law enforcement agents.”
Notably, the stay order upholds a lower court’s earlier ruling. It effectively imposes a temporary administrative injunction that prevents California’s anti-ICE law from being enforced until “the court rules on the government’s motion for an injunction pending appeal.”
The ‘No Secret Police Act,’ signed into law by Gov. Newsom on September 20, 2025, sought to ban federal agents, including ICE officers, from wearing masks except in limited circumstances. Newsom claimed the measure was necessary to push back against “Trump and Stephen Miller’s ‘secret police’ tactics,” adding that it would make California the first state to prohibit such practices.
The Trump administration filed a lawsuit arguing that the mask ban threatened officer safety and unconstitutionally allowed states to regulate federal operations. Earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder ruled the mask ban was discriminatory as it exempted state law enforcement while targeting federal agents. She issued an injunction against the law, which the 9th Circuit Court has now upheld.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Wall Street celebrated on Friday after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a number of tariffs imposed by President Donald J. Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Supreme Court, President Trump, and markets such as the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The Supreme Court ruling was announced on February 20, 2026, with global markets largely closing in the green late Friday afternoon.
🎯IMPACT: Major indexes like the Dow Jones and S&P 500 surged as companies began suing for tariff refunds.
IN FULL
Wall Street and globalist corporations celebrated on Friday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were unlawful. Major market indexes like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite surged throughout the day, with all three closing with significant gains. However, despite corporate investors cheering the high court’s ruling, President Trump announced Friday afternoon he intends to use alternative federal statutes to reimpose the trade levies—including the restoration of a ten percent global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act.
At market close, the Dow Jones rose 0.4 percent, gaining 196 points. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 rose 0.6 percent, and the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.7 percent. While investors welcomed the Supreme Court’s reversal of some tariff measures, the Trump administration was quick to emphasize that the ruling is a significant blow to American workers.
Importantly, while the tariffs authorized under the IEEPA were struck down, other trade levies imposed through Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 are in effect. The National Pulse reported earlier on Friday that President Trump, while addressing the ruling at the White House, warned that while some foreign countries are celebrating the court’s ruling, “They won’t be dancing for long.”
“It is my opinion that the court has been swayed by foreign interests,” the America First leader declared, while noting that the majority did concede that the President has the power to embargo and cut off foreign trade entirely under IEEPA. President Trump went on to cite several other federal laws, as outlined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, that allow him to impose tariffs.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. President Donald J. Trump warned that Europe must resolve its energy and immigration crises or be changed irrevocably.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, European governments.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 20, 2026, at a press conference in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Europe has to get smart. Europe’s getting killed on two things: energy and immigration, and if they don’t solve both of them fast, Europe is not the same place.” – President Trump
🎯IMPACT: President Trump warned Europe will no longer be “the same place” if it does not move to solve its problems “fast.”
IN FULL
U.S. President Donald J. Trump expressed concerns about Europe’s future while addressing a Supreme Court ruling on tariffs on Friday, saying the continent has “gone woke” and that he wants it to “straighten up.” Speaking to the press, he said, “Europe is not recognizable when you go into so many places,” although he praised countries that have been more resistant to mass migration, specifically Hungary, Poland, Czechia, and Slovakia, as exceptions.
“Europe has to be strong, and they’ve become soft and not recognizable. You go into some of the countries, I don’t want to be specific, but I think everyone knows what I’m talking about,” Trump continued. Previously, he has suggested that Britain and France, in particular, have changed for the worse, in the latter case going so far as to say, “France is no longer France.”
“The environmentalists have taken over; they’ve got windmills destroying their fields, their beautiful meadows, and their oceans, and they’re paying a fortune,” he added, warning: “Europe has to get smart. Europe’s getting killed on two things: energy and immigration, and if they don’t solve both of them fast, Europe is not the same place.”
Trump says Europe has gone “woke”
“I want Europe to strengthen up. Europe has gone woke. Europe is not recognizable when you go into so many places. Not all countries.”pic.twitter.com/92SwaPVoFW
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
.jpg){kind=link}
