Thursday, August 20, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ActBlue Faces DOJ Investigation for Misleading Congress About Foreign Donation Vetting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: ActBlue is under investigation for potentially misleading Congress about its vetting of foreign donations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: ActBlue executives, Covington & Burling law firm, Regina Wallace-Jones, and congressional Republicans.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Investigations began in early 2025, with events unfolding through 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: There was “a substantial risk that some of the funds received were impermissible contributions from foreign nationals,” noted Covington & Burling.

🎯IMPACT: The investigations and internal turmoil could destabilize Democratic fundraising efforts ahead of the midterm elections.

IN FULL

ActBlue, the leading Democrat fundraising platform, is now under heavy scrutiny from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Republican lawmakers in Congress. The pressure follows a warning from its own law firm that CEO Regina Wallace-Jones may have misled Congress about how thoroughly the organization screened foreign donations.

In a 2023 letter sent to Republican investigators, Wallace-Jones stated that ActBlue operated a “multilayered” screening process designed to block foreign contributions. However, the law firm Covington & Burling, working for ActBlue, later determined that these procedures were not consistently applied. Internal memos from the lawyers noted that, for instance, donors who paid via third-party apps like Apple Pay, PayPal, and Venmo were not asked to provide their passport information, despite Wallace-Jones assuring Congress they were.

Covington & Burling warned that there was “a substantial risk that some of the funds received were impermissible contributions from foreign nationals,” and that ActBlue’s claims to Congress could trigger a criminal investigation if federal prosecutors concluded that the platform had hidden information about its actual efforts to stop foreign donations. The disclosures have already triggered multiple high-level resignations at the organization.

ActBlue has pushed back against its former legal advisers at Covington, claiming the firm failed to properly review the 2023 letter before it went to Congress. The platform has since ended its relationship with the law firm, claiming it has introduced new safeguards to block foreign donations.

The combination of federal and congressional investigations, plus internal turmoil, is raising serious concerns about ActBlue’s ability to support Democrat fundraising efforts ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Since its founding, the organization has processed nearly $19 billion in donations and now faces mounting pressure to resolve the legal and compliance issues.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

British Industrial Energy Use Plummets, Signaling Looming Economic Crisis.

A new analysis highlights how soaring energy costs and policies prioritizing so-called renewables are contributing to Britain’s economic stagnation and deindustrialization.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Britain is on a “path to impoverishment” as soaring energy costs and declining consumption threaten to drive deindustrialization and economic stagnation, according to a new report from the Institute of Economic Affairs. Britain now has the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world, while overall energy consumption has fallen 29.2 percent since its 2005 peak and industrial use has plunged 45.3 percent since 2004.
📺 DETAIL: The report found that Britain uses roughly half as much energy per person as the average high-income country, with energy consumption per capita falling by 2.4 percent annually between 2008 and 2024 while GDP per head grew by just 0.4 percent a year. Net Zero and energy-related subsidies have cost an estimated £585 billion (~$790 billion) over many years. It is believed that renewable subsidies, carbon taxes, and the costs of balancing and expanding the electricity system have contributed to higher prices. The cost of maintaining grid stability and backup power could rise from about £4 billion (~$5.4 billion) last year to more than £12 billion (~$16.2 billion) annually by 2030 as Britain becomes increasingly reliant on intermittent wind and solar power. The Labour Party government has defended its green agenda energy strategy, however, insisting that net zero represents a major economic opportunity. President Donald J. Trump has repeatedly urged Prime Minister Andy Burnham and his predecessor, Sir Keir Starmer, to reopen Britain’s North Sea oil and gas fields, but Burnham has delayed making a decision.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Cheap and abundant energy is a fundamental prerequisite to a thriving and prosperous economy.” – David Turver, Institute of Economic Affairs
🎯 IMPACT: The report warns that Britain’s reliance on so-called renewable energy sources, which are intermittent and require costly infrastructure, is exacerbating the country’s economic challenges. Falling energy consumption is a sign of industry slowing down, which will have a knock-on effect on overall wealth and employment.

Image by Kirst O’Connor / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new analysis highlights how soaring energy costs and policies prioritizing so-called renewables are contributing to Britain's economic stagnation and deindustrialization.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Populist AfD Demands Abolition of Politicized Intelligence Agency.

Alternative for Germany, the leading eurosceptic populist party in Germany, has criticized Germany’s domestic intelligence agency for alleged political bias, calling for its abolition or major reform.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has called for the abolition of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency.
📺 DETAIL: Alice Weidel, leader of the AfD, has declared that the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, “should be abolished in its current form or at least fundamentally reformed.” Weidel accused the agency of being used to “monitor and suppress the political opposition” and argued that it should re-focus on preventing threats to national security, such as terrorist attacks, rather than policing democratic parties. The agency has labeled the AfD as a “right-wing extremist” organization for criticizing mass immigration and Islam, among other cultural and social issues. This comes amid growing criticism, even from former BfV personnel such as former BfV chief Hans Georg Maaßen, who accused past governments of “using domestic intelligence services to suppress opposition” last year.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “In no other Western democracy are political parties monitored by intelligence agencies That creates an obvious conflict of interest.” – Hans Georg Maaßen, former BfV president
🎯 IMPACT: The AfD’s growing popularity with the German electorate has sparked fears within the country’s establishment that the party cannot be stopped democratically. As such, several left-leaning and establishment-aligned groups have called for the party to be banned or suppressed. The AfD’s call to abolish or reform the BfV demonstrates the growing salience of concerns about the weaponization of the German state and its agencies against the populist right. 
📺 FLASHBACK: The AfD’s call to reform the BfV follows a series of polls that have placed the party ahead of its rivals. Back in August last year, the AfD secured 26 percent of the vote in a poll, two percent ahead of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) formerly led by Angela Merkel, on 24 percent. A poll reported this year showed similar results, establishing a record lead of 8.5 percent for the party.

Image by Olaf Kosinsky.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Alternative for Germany, the leading eurosceptic populist party in Germany, has criticized Germany's domestic intelligence agency for alleged political bias, calling for its abolition or major reform.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Migrants Who Invaded Spanish City Are Snatching Girls, Gang Raping Them in the Mountains: Police.

Spanish police and residents report widespread sexual violence by illegal migrants in Ceuta, as local authorities struggle to address safety and humanitarian concerns.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Spanish police officers are raising concerns about reported sexual assaults involving migrant in Ceuta, saying some victims have been targeted near the Temporary Stay Center for Immigrants and dragged to surrounding settlements in the hills and mountains and gang raped. Police and residents have alleged that groups of women and minors avoid straying from areas around police vehicles because they fear being attacked in isolated terrain.
📺 DETAIL: Spanish Civil Guard sources have reportedly confirmed at least 15 sexual assaults since a mass influx of migrants into the exclave on the coast of North Africa in late July, intensifying concerns over public safety and pressure on local services. Ceuta, a Spanish city a few miles from mainland Spain with about 84,000 residents, has faced significant strain after its invasion by tens of thousands of migrants, with reception facilities overwhelmed and informal settlements developing in surrounding areas. Local residents have also raised concerns about sanitation and healthcare conditions, while some families say they have restricted their daughters’ movements due to the threat of harassment and sexual violence. The reports have renewed debate over the Socialist Party government’s handling of migration and security in Ceuta.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Today there are rapists and pedophiles loose in Ceuta.” – Police union spokeswoman Laura García
🎯 IMPACT: The ongoing violence due to the migrant invasion has caused widespread fear among residents, with women and girls avoiding public spaces and some families relocating entirely. Local residents have even established their own protection camps, citing the government’s failure to ensure safety. Equality Minister Ana Redondo’s assurances of “safe spaces” have been contradicted by both local police and eyewitness accounts.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Spanish police and residents report widespread sexual violence by illegal migrants in Ceuta, as local authorities struggle to address safety and humanitarian concerns.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Surrogate Sued by Biological Parents for Refusing to Abort Baby.

A California couple is suing their surrogate for breach of contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas so the infant could receive life-saving care.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A California couple is suing their surrogate, McKenna West, for allegedly violating a contract by refusing to kill their unborn baby after doctors diagnosed him with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed are seeking more than $100,000 in damages, arguing that West agreed to an abortion clause covering serious fetal abnormalities when they paid her $60,000 to carry the child.
📺 DETAIL: West, a 28-year-old nurse from Alaska, rejected the couple’s demand after the 20-week scan and moved to Texas, where she sought to protect the pregnancy and find medical care for the baby. She later secured court intervention in Dallas that ensured the child would receive medically necessary treatment, although she was barred from having contact with him following his birth. The baby, born August 12 and named Rumi by his biological parents, has since undergone a major surgery used to treat hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and remains in critical but stable condition, according to his parents’ attorney. West’s attorney said she is preparing her own legal action seeking to establish parental rights, arguing that Texas law recognizes the woman who gives birth as the child’s parent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “She is seeking parentage of the child because she gave birth in Texas, and in Texas, if you give birth to a child, it’s your child.” – Lincoln Wilson, McKenna West’s attorney
🎯 IMPACT: The lawsuit highlights the complex legal and ethical conflicts that can arise when parents who pay surrogates to carry their children insist on so-called abortion clauses and attempt to enforce them. The case could have broader implications for surrogacy contracts, parental rights, and how courts handle disputes involving surrogate parents.
📺 FLASHBACK: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the baby’s condition, has seen significant success rates with early surgical intervention, with some hospitals reporting 100 percent success for the initial procedure. This medical context played a key role in West’s decision to carry her pregnancy to term.

Image by SHYCITYNikon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A California couple is suing their surrogate for breach of contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas so the infant could receive life-saving care.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Arrested for Fatal Stabbing of Virginia Mom.

An illegal alien previously released into the U.S. by Border Patrol under Joe Biden is accused of killing a Virginia mother near a jogging trail.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A Salvadoran national accused of fatally stabbing a Virginia mother had previously been apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol and released into the country under former President Joe Biden, according to a federal source. Alexis Antonio Cedillos-Campos was arrested on Wednesday in connection with the death of 42-year-old Carmen Lizet Puch, who was found dead Monday morning near Difficult Run Park in Great Falls, Virginia, after being stabbed and doused in gasoline. Federal sources told Melugin that Cedillos-Campos was apprehended by Border Patrol in El Paso, Texas, in April 2024 but subsequently released into the U.S. interior.
📺 DETAIL: Puch, a Reston resident and mother of a young daughter, was discovered near her car shortly before 7 AM after suffering trauma to her upper body, and police classified the case as a stabbing homicide. Investigators allege Cedillos-Campos and Puch had worked together at a Herndon restaurant and had an intimate relationship. Authorities say the suspect left the restaurant carrying a large knife, latex gloves, and a water bottle before traveling to the park. Police allege Cedillos-Campos repeatedly stabbed Puch, poured gasoline on her, and attempted to set her on fire before later confessing to the killing. The case comes amid renewed scrutiny of violent crimes involving Salvadoran nationals in the United States, including cases involving Salvadoran migrants accused or convicted of sexual assault and murder.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I’m told by [a] federal source that the suspect… is a Salvadoran illegal alien who was caught and released at the border by the Biden admin in El Paso, TX in April 2024.” – Bill Melugin
🎯 IMPACT: The case is likely to intensify criticism of the Biden government’s “catch and release” policies, which President Donald J. Trump ended following his return to the White House.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An illegal alien previously released into the U.S. by Border Patrol under Joe Biden is accused of killing a Virginia mother near a jogging trail.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Prosecutors Raise Comey’s Crime Novel About Using Coded Messages to Incite Murder in ‘8647’ Case.

Federal prosecutors allege that a social media post by former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey constituted a coded threat against President Donald J. Trump

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Federal prosecutors have accused James Comey of making a “true threat” against President Donald J. Trump, citing the former FBI chief’s own crime novel against him.
📺 DETAIL: Comey’s book, titled FDR Drive, was released shortly after his infamous “8647” Instagram post. The post showed seashells arranged into the number. “86” is mob slang for “get rid of” or “kill,” while “47” is a reference to President Trump as the 47th President of the United States. According to documents filed on Tuesday, the book’s plot revolves around a prosecutor targeting a “far-right wing media personality” whose enemies are killed after coded messages are posted online. “[H]e singled out his enemies by name and suggested ‘something should be done’ about them,” read the filed documents. Prosecutors argue that the parallels between the novel’s plot and the post show that Comey was making a coded and intentional threat against the President. “Comey published a novel where the antagonist successfully persuades his followers to kill his political rivals by communicating coded messages online,” prosecutors argued.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Comey published a novel where the antagonist successfully persuades his followers to kill his political rivals by communicating coded messages online. Needless to say, Comey does not and could not point to similar evidence in any comparator case—let alone a threat against the sitting President of the United States.” – Federal prosecutors’ filing
🎯 IMPACT: Comey has pleaded not guilty. While the former FBI chief’s claim that he was unaware of the violent implications of his Instagram post, the plot of his book shows an awareness of how coded online messaging can be used to encourage political violence. This follows revelations earlier this month that the FBI covertly investigated the President on false allegations of being a Russian asset even after Comey was dismissed from his position. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Federal prosecutors allege that a social media post by former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey constituted a coded threat against President Donald J. Trump

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Retired Cop Fined for Joking About Islamic Prophet’s Marriage to a Child.

A British retiree has been fined for joking about the Islamic prophet’s marriage to a child on social media, spotlighting the United Kingdom’s censorious laws against “grossly offensive” communications.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  A retired County Durham, England, police officer is appealing a conviction and £1,000 (~$1,350) fine after being prosecuted for social media post that a judge ruled was “grossly offensive.” Stephen Gray, 65, was initially investigated after a neighbor reported two Facebook posts.
📺 DETAIL: Gray was acquitted over the first post, which combined a call for “mass deportation” with a satirical claim about a migrant seeking accommodation with better amenities and a halal menu. The second post, which joked, “Fun facts about Bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9-year-old!” led to his conviction under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it an offense to send a message over a public electronic communications network that is “grossly offensive” or indecent, obscene, or menacing. Gray said the post was intended as satire and was meant to encourage discussion about the marriage of the Islamic prophet, Mohammed, to a young child, and child marriage in Muslim-majority countries generally. District Judge Steven Hood ruled that the post was designed to be offensive and was not capable of being interpreted seriously because it was presented as a joke. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had initially determined there was no realistic prospect of conviction and declined to prosecute, but the neighbor who informed on Gray requested a review through the Victims’ Right to Review scheme.
🎯 IMPACT: The case will intensify concerns over how broadly England and Wales’ communications laws are being applied to online speech, particularly when political, social, or religious sensitivities are involved, rendering freedom of speech a dead letter. Gray’s appeal in November may help clarify where courts should draw the line between legitimate satire and what the British state regards as criminally offensive speech.
📺 FLASHBACK: Section 127 of the Communications Act has been criticized in the past for its broad and subjective definition of “grossly offensive” material, which the authorities often exploit to prosecute politically incorrect speech.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This is blasphemy law by the back door.” – Stephen Gray

Image by James Mitchell.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A British retiree has been fined for joking about the Islamic prophet's marriage to a child on social media, spotlighting the United Kingdom's censorious laws against "grossly offensive" communications.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New Ukrainian Defense Chief Installed as Predecessor Calls for Wartime Elections.

Volodymyr Zelensky’s leadership in Ukraine is facing fresh challenges, as the former Minister of Defense and Acting Head of the Security Service calls for fresh elections.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Ukraine’s parliament appointed former special forces operative Yevhenii Khmara as Minister of Defense, equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of War, on Wednesday, hours after his predecessor, Mykhailo Fedorov, called for wartime elections, over two years after President Volodymyr Zelensky‘s current term was supposed to end. Khmara takes over as Ukraine faces continued Russian missile attacks and battlefield pressure, while Zelensky confronts growing criticism over recent government shake-ups.
📺 DETAIL: The removal last month of Fedorov, who was also Acting Head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), sparked rare wartime protests against Zelensky, with thousands taking to the streets to demand his reinstatement. Fedorov now argues that Ukraine must find a legal and secure way to restore its democratic process despite the prolonged conflict, although analysts say organizing elections would be extremely difficult with millions of Ukrainians displaced and hundreds of thousands serving in the military. Khmara was reportedly not Zelensky’s first choice for the defense post, and he has faced criticism from some lawmakers who view him as too closely aligned with the President. His appointment comes amid further political turmoil after anti-corruption authorities announced an investigation into an alleged $3 million money-laundering scheme involving a deputy head of Zelensky’s office
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We must find a legal, safe, and realistic mechanism that will allow Ukraine to renew its full democratic process even in the conditions of a long war.” – Mykhailo Fedorov
🎯 IMPACT: The instability created by Fedorov’s replacement and public call for fresh elections could complicate Kiev’s efforts to maintain public confidence and political unity.
📺 FLASHBACK: Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies have been under pressure to address high-profile graft cases, including a $100 million kickback scheme involving the state atomic energy agency last year, which led to public outrage and the dismissal of key officials.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Volodymyr Zelensky's leadership in Ukraine is facing fresh challenges, as the former Minister of Defense and Acting Head of the Security Service calls for fresh elections.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: Most California Dems Favor Democratic Socialist Candidates.

A new poll has revealed a growing generational split among California Democrats, with younger Democrats favoring democratic socialists and older Democrats favoring more mainstream candidates, with substantial support for far-left candidates overall.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Most California Democrats support democratic socialist candidates, according to a new poll.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, and co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times, 58 percent of registered Democrats in California favored democratic socialist candidates. The poll also revealed that 60 percent of Democrats in the state support progressives, while only 48 percent favor more mainstream Democrats. Notably, support for democratic socialist candidates varies by age cohort. Democrats under 40 show more support for democratic socialists, while Democrats over 65 overwhelmingly back mainstream Democrats. Specifically, 69 percent of California Democrats aged between 18 and 29 expressed support for democratic socialists, compared to 45 percent of those over 65. In contrast, only 32 percent of Democrats in the state between 18 and 29 were more inclined to support a mainstream Democrat, compared to 67 percent of those over 65. The survey also revealed that 40 percent of all Californian voters support progressives, slightly ahead of democratic socialists, specifically, on 38 percent.
💬 KEY QUOTE:There’s particular frustration among the younger voting population… Their views of mainstream Democrats are not that positive, and that’s a long-term problem, I think, for the Democratic Party.” – Mark DiCamillo, Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) poll director
🎯 IMPACT: The results highlight the internal divisions within the Democratic Party. This underscores the leftward shift of the Democrats over the course of the 2026 election cycle. This reflects similar reports from earlier this year. Back in July, a poll revealed that one-third of Democrats describe themselves as democratic socialists. That same month, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who is backed by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the far-left political organization currently taking over the Democrats from within, topped a poll in New Hampshire.

Image by Famartin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed a growing generational split among California Democrats, with younger Democrats favoring democratic socialists and older Democrats favoring more mainstream candidates, with substantial support for far-left candidates overall.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Sheriff Bans ICE From Firing Ranges and Training Facilities.

San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced restrictions on ICE’s use of county facilities while maintaining access for CBP to safeguard border operations and the regional economy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced Tuesday that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will no longer be permitted to use sheriff facilities for firearms qualifications and training, alleging it will damage community trust.
📺 DETAIL: The decision comes as the San Diego County Board of Supervisors moves to terminate facility agreements with both ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), though Martinez distinguished between the two agencies when issuing her ban, saying she will continue to allow CBP to use the county’s Otay Range. More than 225,000 people cross through San Diego’s ports of entry each day, including tens of thousands of vehicles, pedestrians, and commercial trucks, according to the sheriff’s office. Martinez said CBP relies on the Otay Range for required classroom and firearms training and has limited alternatives nearby, potentially forcing officers to travel farther from inspection facilities. Martinez conceded that eliminating CBP’s access would cause broader harm to residents and businesses.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Our authority to enforce the law depends on the trust and confidence of the communities we serve, and I always balance my decisions based on community trust and public safety,” said Sheriff Kelly Martinez, appearing to suggest that illegal aliens subject to deportation are one of the communities she serves.
🎯 IMPACT: The decision will strain relations and cooperation between local authorities and federal immigration agencies, raising concerns about the operational impact of restricting access to training facilities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

San Diego County Sheriff Kelly Martinez announced restrictions on ICE's use of county facilities while maintaining access for CBP to safeguard border operations and the regional economy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.