The social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, now permits porn. The social media site has updated its guidelines to permit the sharing of “consensually produced and distributed adult nudity or sexual behavior.” Under the new guidelines, this material must be labeled appropriately and cannot appear in prominent locations such as profile pictures or banners.
Prior to these changes, X did not explicitly ban pornography. The platform became a popular avenue for NSFW creators following the introduction of Twitter Blue — now rebranded as X Premium — where creators could charge followers to access their content, similar to the model employed by OnlyFans. The new rules could potentially create a new revenue stream for X, which has experienced a decline in advertising sales since Elon Musk acquired the company.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Users who consistently post NSFW content will be required to mark their images and videos as sensitive content. X’s guidelines apply to all types of adult content, including AI-generated images, photographs, and animations. By default, users under 18 or those who have not entered their birth date will not be able to view NSFW material.
The updated guidelines also prohibit content that promotes exploitation, nonconsent, objectification, sexualization or harm to minors, and other obscene behaviors. In March, X announced it would allow NSFW communities to use an “Adult Content” label to prevent posts from being automatically filtered.
Despite the new rules, enforcement remains a challenge. In January, explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift spread on X, and the platform struggled to curtail their dissemination quickly.
X saw a significant increase in adult-related content following Musk’s decision to cut content teams, and the new changes may be a belated acknowledgment of an already existing reality.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: North Carolina Republican lawmakers approved new U.S. House district maps aimed at securing an additional GOP seat for the 2026 elections.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: North Carolina General Assembly Republicans, Democratic Rep. Don Davis, and state Democrats.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The maps were finalized on Wednesday, October 22, 2025, in North Carolina’s legislative chambers.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The new congressional map improves Republican political strength in eastern North Carolina and will bring in an additional Republican seat to North Carolina’s congressional delegation.” – GOP Rep. Brenden Jones
🎯IMPACT: Republicans could secure 11 of 14 U.S. House seats in North Carolina, bolstering GOP efforts to maintain control of Congress.
IN FULL
North Carolina Republican lawmakers adopted new U.S. House district maps on Wednesday, aiming to secure an additional GOP seat in the 2026 elections. The state House approved the maps following a party-line vote in the Senate on Tuesday. The changes are likely to significantly reduce the reelection odds for Congressman Don Davis (D-NC), who represents a district in northeastern North Carolina that is considered a swing seat as neither Republicans nor Democrats hold a clear partisan advantage.
Republicans currently hold majorities in both chambers of the North Carolina General Assembly, and Governor Josh Stein ID-NC) cannot veto redistricting maps under state law. This leaves the GOP’s proposal poised for implementation unless legal challenges from Democrats or voting rights groups succeed. Candidate filing for the 2026 elections is set to begin on December 1, 2025.
Speaking on the floor, state Representative Brenden Jones (R), defended the mid-cycle district redraw, arguing: “The new congressional map improves Republican political strength in eastern North Carolina and will bring in an additional Republican seat to North Carolina’s congressional delegation.” Democrats, however, criticized the maps as a racial gerrymander, with state Rep. Gloristine Brown (D) declaring, “You are silencing Black voices and are going against the will of your constituents.”
The new map could shift counties in Rep. Davis’s 1st District to a coastal district more favorable to Republicans. Statewide election data suggests the GOP could win 11 of 14 House seats under the new boundaries. However, the new districts will likely draw numerous legal challenges from Democrats and leftist lawfare groups who claim the map violates the Voting Rights Act.
Republican leaders in the state legislature contend that the redistricting was based on political considerations, not racial data. GOP leaders also pointed to North Carolina’s support for President Donald J. Trump in recent presidential elections as justification for increasing Republican representation in Congress. Senate leader Phil Berger said the maps align with “listening to the will of the people.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The National Pulse officially joined the Pentagon’s press corps on Wednesday, following an effort by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to open access to the department to news outlets beyond Washington, D.C.’s corporate media establishment.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam and political editor Will Upton, along with senior Pentagon officials like Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson, Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell, and the corporate media.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday, October 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We are excited to announce over 60 journalists, representing a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists, have signed the Pentagon’s media access policy and will be joining the new Pentagon press corps.” — Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell
🎯IMPACT: The Pentagon press corps and new media policy aim to prevent the leakage of classified information, while also expanding access to “a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists.”
IN FULL
The National Pulse officially joined the Pentagon’s press corps on Wednesday, following an effort by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to open access to the department to news outlets beyond Washington, D.C.’s corporate media establishment.
“Thank you for opening this up from previously only being accessible to the (often foreign-funded) corporate media,” The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) addressed to Hegesh. The National Pulse’s political editor, Will Upon, will serve as the lead Pentagon correspondent, with Kassm providing coverage as well.
NEWS: I am pleased to announce @TheNatPulse is now part of the Pentagon’s press corps.
“We are excited to announce over 60 journalists, representing a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists, have signed the Pentagon’s media access policy and will be joining the new Pentagon press corps. Twenty-six journalists across 18 outlets were among the former Pentagon press corps who chose to sign the DOW media access policy,” Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell said in a statement.
“New media outlets and independent journalists have created the formula to circumvent the lies of the mainstream media and get real news directly to the American people. Their reach and impact collectively are far more effective and balanced than the self-righteous media who chose to self-deport from the Pentagon,” he added.
Today, the Department of War is announcing the next generation of the Pentagon press corps.
We are excited to announce over 60 journalists, representing a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists, have signed the Pentagon’s media access policy and will be…
In late September, the Pentagon undertook a major shake-up of its press corps aimed at cracking down on leaks of classified information and the malicious publication of national security secrets. This included issuing a renewed Pentagon media policy designed to prevent media presence in sensitive national security areas and limit access to Pentagon officials without approval from the Department of War.
Notably, the number of former Pentagon press corps members who have signed on to the media policy has risen to 26, representing 18 total media outlets. Just over 60 journalists are being accredited for the first time.
The leak of a preliminary, low-confidence Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment of the U.S. strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities via CNN’s Natasha Bertand likely gave urgency to the policy change. Media outlets used documents to prematurely declare the bombings a failure.
Bertrand has a long history of politically motivated reporting, having aggressively promoted the Russiagate hoax. She has also been credibly accused of serving as a conduit for defense and intelligence community partisans who worked to suppress news coverage of Hunter Biden’s “Laptop from Hell,” smearing it as Russian disinformation.
Notably, Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson, née Cortes, previously served as a writing fellow at The National Pulse,
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration agreed to cancel billions in student loan debt for up to 2.5 million borrowers as part of a federal court settlement over stalled income-driven repayment (IDR) programs.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Trump administration, and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE).
📍WHEN & WHERE: The settlement was filed on October 17, 2025, in federal court as part of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) v. U.S. Department of Education case.
💬KEY QUOTE: “For nearly a decade, the AFT has fought for the rights of student loan borrowers to be freed from the shackles of unjust debt – and today, a huge part of that affordability fight was vindicated.” – Randi Weingarten, AFT President
🎯IMPACT: Borrowers eligible for relief are being notified, with options to accept forgiveness or opt out, according to the Department of Education.
IN FULL
The Trump administration has agreed to cancel billions of dollars in federal student loan debt for as many as 2.5 million borrowers, following a federal court settlement in the case American Federation of Teachers (AFT) v. U.S. Department of Education. The settlement, filed on October 17, reinstates loan forgiveness provisions tied to income-driven repayment (IDR) programs, including Income-Contingent Repayment (ICR), Pay As You Earn (PAYE), and Income-Based Repayment (IBR). These plans cap monthly payments based on income and household size, and forgive remaining balances after 20 to 25 years of qualifying payments.
The agreement comes after the AFT sued the Trump administration in March 2025, claiming it had unlawfully reversed Joe Biden-era loan forgiveness initiatives. According to the lawsuit, the Department of Education, under President Trump, removed IDR enrollment applications from federal websites and directed servicers to stop processing new enrollments and forgiveness applications. The AFT argued that this violated federal law by denying borrowers access to debt relief guaranteed by Congress.
“For nearly a decade, the AFT has fought for the rights of student loan borrowers to be freed from the shackles of unjust debt—and today, a huge part of that affordability fight was vindicated,” said AFT President Randi Weingarten in a statement. “Our agreement means that borrowers stuck in limbo can either get immediate relief or finally see a light at the end of the tunnel. And, crucially, they won’t ever get taxed on that relief. The AFT will hold the federal government to its word, and we won’t stop fighting until college is affordable and taking out a student loan doesn’t trap millions of Americans in a ruinous and exploitative debt cycle.”
The Department of Education began notifying eligible borrowers in October, sending emails that offer the option to accept forgiveness or opt out. Borrowers who receive forgiveness by the end of 2025 will not face federal income taxes on the discharged debt, under provisions maintained from previous legislation.
This settlement comes amid broader changes to the Department of Education under Trump. In March 2025, the president signed an executive order directing the department’s dismantling, aiming to return educational authority to states and local governments.
Earlier that year, the department eliminated over $600 million in funding for teacher training programs which promoted “divisive ideologies,” including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. As part of this shift, the department’s workforce has also been significantly reduced.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal raid in New York City’s Chinatown led to the arrests of nine illegalmigrants from West Africa and four protesters accused of obstructing law enforcement.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Migrants from Senegal, Mali, and Guinea; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents; protesters; and New York City officials.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday in New York City’s Chinatown neighborhood, specifically on Canal Street.
💬KEY QUOTE: “During this law enforcement operation, rioters who were shouting obscenities, became violent and obstructed law enforcement duties, including blocking vehicles and assaulting law enforcement.” – DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The operation highlighted tensions between federal law enforcement and local officials, sparking criticism from activists and politicians.
IN FULL
On Tuesday, a federal operation led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in New York City’s Chinatown led to the arrest of nine illegal immigrants from Senegal, Mali, and Guinea, who were allegedly involved in selling counterfeit goods. Additionally, four protesters were detained for reportedly interfering with law enforcement by blocking vehicles and throwing objects.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the raid “targeted” and “intelligence-driven,” aimed at addressing criminal activity tied to counterfeit goods. “During this law enforcement operation, rioters who were shouting obscenities, became violent and obstructed law enforcement duties, including blocking vehicles and assaulting law enforcement,” McLaughlin noted. “Already, one rioter has been arrested for assault on a federal officer.”
Murad Awawdeh, vice president of advocacy at the New York Immigration Coalition, stated during a news conference that between 15 and 40 vendors were arrested, along with two local residents protesting the operation. City officials, including a spokesman for Mayor Eric Adams, stressed their adherence to local, anti-borders “sanctuary” policies, noting that New York City does not assist federal authorities with civil deportation actions.
Zohran Mamdani, the Democrats’ socialist mayoral candidate—himself a Ugandan immigrant—condemned the raid as “aggressive and reckless” in a post on X. “Once again, the Trump administration chooses authoritarian theatrics that create fear, not safety. It must stop,” he declared.
Notably, Mamdani is on record as favoring defunding the police and abolishing prisons and ICE.
NYC: Arrests and Clashes as protesters STAND OFF with ICE agents during a RAID on Canal Street
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate, apologized for a tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Graham Platner, Senator Susan Collins, and Jonathan Greenblatt of the Anti-Defamation League.
📍WHEN & WHERE: October 22, 2025, in Maine, during a podcast interview.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I am not a secret Nazi,” Platner insisted.
🎯IMPACT: The incident has drawn scrutiny and criticism, impacting Mr. Platner’s campaign.
IN FULL
Graham Platner, a Democrat Senate candidate in Maine, running against incumbent Senator Susan Collins (R), has apologized for a Nazi Totenkopf (death’s head) tattoo on his chest. Platner claims that he was intoxicated when he got the tattoo and was unaware of its extremist implications.
On the Democrat-aligned podcast Pod Save America, Platner discussed the tattoo, which features a skull and crossbones, claiming it was randomly chosen while he was stationed in Croatia with the Marines. He insisted it is a common military symbol and stated, “I am not a secret Nazi.”
The Totenkopf was an official emblem of the Waffen SS in Nazi Germany, and is particularly associated with the SS-Totenkopfverbände, which administered the Nazi concentration camps.
Platner has also faced scrutiny for past Reddit posts that minimized sexual assault in the military and disparaged police and rural white Americans. He claimed he is remorseful for these comments, linking them to a challenging time in his life when he was dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Despite the controversy, far-left Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) continues to support Platner, calling him an “excellent candidate.”
Platner says he intends to have the tattoo removed and noted that he never tried to hide it, even during his military enlistment. He emphasized personal growth, stating that people can evolve and that everyone has made mistakes online.
🚨NEW: Maine liberal Graham Platner’s Nazi tattoo revealed
This comes less than a week after he was caught:
➡️ Advocating for political violence ➡️ Saying Black people don’t tip ➡️ Calling all police “bastards” ➡️ Calling Maine’s lobstermen “pieces of sh*t”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The federal government’s budget deficit significantly shrank over the second quarter of the fiscal year, according to data released by the U.S. Treasury Department, suggesting the U.S. fiscal situation will continue improving.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessentt, and the U.S. Treasury Department.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Bessent highlighted the data on Wednesday, October 17, as part of the Treasury Department’s Monthly Treasury Statement.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The budget deficit began to shrink dramatically beginning in the second quarter of this year when there was no overlap with the Biden administration. From April to September, the cumulative deficit totaled just $468 billion. This is the lowest reading since 2019 and is down nearly 40 percent from the comparable period last year when Biden was spending recklessly.” — Secretary Bessent
🎯IMPACT: The Treasury Department contends that if tariff revenues and current fiscal restraint measures are maintained, the federal government’s deficit-to-GDP ratio will fall below four percent, a number largely seen as acceptable in terms of an annual fiscal loss.
IN FULL
The federal government’s budget deficit significantly shrank over the second quarter of the fiscal year, according to data released by the U.S. Treasury Department. Fueled by increased government revenues, including historic levels of money coming into the Treasury Department from President Donald J. Trump’s tariff policies, the second quarter deficit reading was the lowest in over half a decade.
“President Trump is taking control of unwieldy government spending to get the U.S. fiscal house in order. In response, financial markets have cheered the President’s accomplishments, with benchmark Treasury yields making new intra-year lows,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Wednesday, noting: “The budget deficit began to shrink dramatically beginning in the second quarter of this year when there was no overlap with the Biden administration. From April to September, the cumulative deficit totaled just $468 billion. This is the lowest reading since 2019 and is down nearly 40 percent from the comparable period last year when Biden was spending recklessly.”
The budget deficit began to shrink dramatically beginning in the second quarter of this year when there was no overlap with the Biden administration. From April to September, the cumulative deficit totaled just $468 billion. This is the lowest reading since 2019 and is down… pic.twitter.com/6L7HslW03c
— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) October 22, 2025
The overall budget deficit for the 2025 fiscal year was $41 billion below last year’s total, though the federal government still added $1.77 trillion to the national debt, which remains a serious economic and political concern. However, the Treasury Department points to other government data showing a considerable improvement in federal outlays, which are largely outpaced by revenue, suggesting the U.S. fiscal situation will likely continue improving. In the second quarter, federal outlays rose by just 0.2 percent compared to the previous year, while in the third quarter, government spending fell by 2.5 percent.
Last month, the federal government reported a budget surplus of $198 billion, a nearly $118 billion increase from the $80 billion surplus widely touted by the former Biden government for September 2024. The Treasury Department contends that if tariff revenues and current fiscal restraint measures are maintained, the federal government’s deficit-to-GDP ratio will fall below four percent, a number largely considered acceptable for an annual fiscal loss.
.Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Thousands of Irish citizens protested outside a migrant hotel in Dublin after reports surfaced that an asylum seeker had sexually assaulted a ten-year-old girl.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Protesters, the Irish police (Gardai), and a 26-year-old migrant accused of the assault.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The night of October 21 at the Citywest Hotel in Saggart, Dublin, Ireland.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This was obviously not a peaceful protest. The actions this evening can only be described as thuggery.” – Police Commissioner Justin Kelly.
🎯IMPACT: Six arrests were made, a police vehicle was set on fire, and tensions over Ireland’s migrant policies have escalated.
IN FULL
Thousands of protesters gathered outside the Citywest Hotel in southwest Dublin, Ireland, on Tuesday night, following reports that a ten-year-old girl had been sexually assaulted by an asylum seeker housed at the facility. The demonstration quickly turned violent, with members of the crowd throwing bricks, bottles, and fireworks at police. An Irish police vehicle was set on fire during the unrest.
Around 2,000 people joined the protest, which was met by a deployment of 300 Gardaí (Irish police) in riot gear. A water cannon was used in an effort to disperse the crowd, as some protesters wielded pitchforks and garden tools while chanting “GET THEM OUT!” in reference to the migrants staying at the hotel. Police Commissioner Justin Kelly described the event as “thuggery,” saying, “This was obviously not a peaceful protest. The actions this evening can only be described as thuggery.”
The Citywest Hotel, Ireland’s largest, was recently purchased by the government for approximately $162 million to serve as a permanent accommodation centre for migrants. The decision has faced strong opposition from locals, with ongoing protests and a petition gathering thousands of signatures.
Scenes of unrest unfolded as thousands gathered outside Citywest asylum hub in response to the alleged sexual assault of a child by an asylum seeker. pic.twitter.com/eylIDVzeIl
The alleged assault occurred between Sunday night and early Monday morning. The suspect, a 26-year-old migrant whose asylum application had been rejected last year, with a deportation order issued earlier in 2025. However, he was not actually removed from the country.
The man required an Arabic interpreter during court proceedings. The young girl, who was in state care, had reportedly wandered away from her guardians during an outing in central Dublin before encountering the suspect.
Irish Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan condemned the protest. “The weaponising of a crime by people who wish to sow dissent in our society is not unexpected,” he said.
The unrest follows a pattern of similar incidents across Ireland over the past two years. In November 2023, violent riots erupted in Dublin after a migrant was accused of stabbing three children and a woman outside a school. Smaller towns and villages have also seen pushback over large-scale migrant placements, with local residents citing strained public services and lack of consultation.
Thousands gathered outside Citywest. Garda POU being hammered by glass and other objects. pic.twitter.com/T4yCzLjSv0
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge issued an order to bar U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from making arrests at courthouses without a warrant.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey Cummings and ICE agents.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Recently in Cook County, Illinois.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The fair administration of justice requires that courts remain open and accessible, and that litigants and witnesses may appear without fear of civil arrest.” – Judge Jeffrey Cummings
🎯IMPACT: ICE agents are restricted from making “collateral arrests” at courthouses, impacting their operations.
IN FULL
U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey Cummings, appointed to the bench by former President Joe Biden, has issued an order barring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from arresting illegal immigrants inside the Cook County courthouse in downtown Chicago, Illinois, unless they can produce a warrant. The legally and ethically dubious directive follows a number of arrests executed by ICE both inside and near several Chicago-area courthouses.
“The fair administration of justice requires that courts remain open and accessible, and that litigants and witnesses may appear without fear of civil arrest,” Judge Cummings wrote, continuing: “One thing seems clear: ICE rousted American citizens from their apartments during the middle of the night and detained them—in zip ties no less—for far longer than the ‘brief’ period authorized by the operative regulation.”
Cummings’s order aims explicitly to prevent ICE agents from making so-called “collateral arrests,” where immigration enforcement agents executing an arrest warrant also detain other illegal immigrants present in or near the courthouse. The Democrat-appointed judge threatened that he would back the directive by ordering the arrest of any ICE agent who violates it.
In response, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended the actions of ICE agents, arguing that courthouses should not be exempt from law enforcement activities. “We aren’t some medieval kingdom; there are no legal sanctuaries where you can hide and avoid the consequences for breaking the law,” DHS stated. “Nothing in the Constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Two of the largest alleged H-1B visa mills, Cognizant and Tata Consultancy Services, appear to be backing away from their practice of employing unusually high numbers of foreign workers after President Donald J. Trump imposed a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Cognizant, Tata Consultancy Services, foreign workers, and American workers.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The shift in hiring practices comes after President Trump issued an Executive Order in September, instituting the new application fee.
💬KEY QUOTE: “On H-1B, we have significantly localized our workforce in the U.S. We believe our business model will be able to adapt quickly to any changes in immigration policy.” — Sudeep Kunnumal, Tata’s chief human resources officer
🎯IMPACT: The change in hiring behavior by Cognizant and Tata suggests the Trump administration’s H-1B application fee is having its desired effect, pushing companies in the U.S. away from being overly reliant on foreign labor and towards hiring Americans.
IN FULL
Several top U.S. employers are halting sponsorships for H-1B visas for non-technical positions after President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order in September imposing a $100,000 fee on all new visa applications. Notably, two major alleged H-1B visa mills, Cognizant and Tata Consultancy Services, are among the firms moving away from an over-reliance on cheap foreign labor.
“On H-1B, we have significantly localized our workforce in the U.S.,” said Tata’s chief human resources officer, Sudeep Kunnumal, on a recent earnings call. He added: “We believe our business model will be able to adapt quickly to any changes in immigration policy.”
The Trump administration’s new application fee likely had a direct impact on the company’s decision to move away from reliance on cheaper foreign labor, as data shows the multinational IT firm is one of the largest sponsors of H-1B visas.
Meanwhile, Cognizant—another IT consultancy firm founded in India along with Tata—has begun stating on new job postings that it will “only consider applicants for this position who are legally authorized to work in the United States without the need of employer sponsorship.”
The Trump White House has defended the unusually high fee compared to past administrations as necessary to encourage companies to focus on training and expanding the American labor force and its skill base.
Last week, The National Pulse reported that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a major globalist lobbying entity representing 300,000 corporate interests, had filed a federal lawsuit calling in the $100,000 fee. “Many members of the U.S. Chamber are bracing for the need to scale back or entirely walk away from the H-1B program, to the detriment of their investors, customers, and their own existing employees,” the Chamber complained in its filing.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A boat migrant deported from Britain to France under a contentious “one out, one in” deal with the French government has returned to Britain on another small boat.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Britain’s Home Office, French authorities, and illegal immigrants.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The returns deal was announced earlier this year, with the latest developments reported this week in Britain and France.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If I had felt that France was safe for me, I would never have returned to the UK.” – Anonymous migrant
🎯IMPACT: The migrant’s return raises further questions about the efficacy of the “one out, one in” deal, which was already under fire for covering only a small number of migrants while illegal crossings have remained in the thousands.
IN FULL
A boat migrant deported to France under a new “one out, one in” deal between the British and French governments has reportedly returned to Britain on another small boat.
Britain’s Home Office—roughly equivalent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security—states that 42 migrants have been returned to France as part of this arrangement, which was introduced earlier this year by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron. Despite the fact that it entails Britain taking a migrant from France for every boat migrant that is returned, it is supposed to deter boat migrant crossings by raising the possibility that such journeys will be wasted. However, thousands of boat migrants have crossed since it was introduced, indicating that it is not working.
Now, one migrant from the initial group of deportees has already returned, claiming that France—a First-World European Union (EU) and NATO member state—is unsafe. He told the left-wing Guardian newspaper, “If I had felt that France was safe for me, I would never have returned to the UK.”
This comes as Prime Minister Starmer, of the leftist Labour Party, is hosting a summit on illegal immigration with other European leaders. A government spokesman for his government attempted to defend the “one out, one in” deal, stating: “We’ve been clear about the arrangement with France, that this is the beginning of a landmark scheme which is not, in itself, a silver bullet.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
,_belt_buckle,_dagger,_etc._Lofoten_Krigsminnemuseum_(Gestapo_office)_Norway_2019-05-08_DSC00193_cropped_focused.jpg){kind=link}
