Friday, December 5, 2025
Purchased by The National Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Melania & Eric Trump Sound Alarm Over ‘Hidden’ Details of Trump Assassination Attempt.

Eric and Melania Trump have raised grave concerns about the investigation into the July 2023 assassination attempt on Donald Trump, suggesting key details are being concealed from the public. Melania Trump, normally private and reserved, released a video expressing deep dissatisfaction with the way the situation has been handled.

“The attempt to end my husband’s life was a horrible, distressing experience,” she said. “Now, the silence around it feels heavy. I can’t help but wonder: Why didn’t law enforcement officials arrest the shooter before the speech? There is definitely more to this story, and we need to uncover the truth.”

Her statement referred to the July 13th incident in Butler, Pennsylvania, when 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired eight rounds during one of Donald Trump’s rallies. One of the bullets struck Trump’s right ear, causing profuse bleeding and almost killing the 45th President.

Though Crooks was shot and killed by a Secret Service sniper, Melania’s recent remarks imply that the investigation may have left critical questions unanswered. The shooter’s motives remain “unknown,” and while Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned shortly after the incident, taking responsibility for the security failure, the Trump family suggests that this may not be the end of the story.

Eric Trump followed Melania’s lead, posting on social media shortly after her video was released. “I want answers as well,” he wrote. “Something is being hidden.” This statement adds fuel to the growing speculation within Trump’s circle that certain details have not been fully disclosed to the public.

As public pressure mounts, law enforcement agencies may face increasing calls for more transparency on the assassination attempt and Crooks’ potential motivations. The Trump family’s insistence on uncovering the truth continues to raise questions about what, if anything, remains hidden from public view.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Moves to Tackle Affordability Crisis With ‘Tiny Cars.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump approved the manufacturing of “tiny cars” in the United States.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, U.S. automakers, and federal regulators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on Friday via Truth Social.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They can be propelled by gasoline, electric, or hybrid. These cars of the very near future are inexpensive, safe, fuel efficient and, quite simply, AMAZING!!! START BUILDING THEM NOW!” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The decision aims to lower costs for consumers while offering new, efficient vehicle options.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump cleared the way on Friday for U.S. automakers to begin manufacturing “tiny cars.” The ultra-compact vehicle models are popular across Europe amd in Japan and other East Asian nations. Designed for use in urban areas with narrow streets, the Trump administration believes American car makers will be able to compete in both the domestic and Asian auto markets.

“I have just approved TINY CARS to be built in America. Manufacturers have long wanted to do this, just like they are so successfully built in other countries,” President Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. He added: “They can be propelled by gasoline, electric, or hybrid. These cars of the very near future are inexpensive, safe, fuel efficient and, quite simply, AMAZING!!! START BUILDING THEM NOW! Thank you to the DOJ and the Departments of Transportation and Environment.”

The regulatory approval of ultra-compact vehicle models is one facet of the Trump White House’s affordability policy push ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In recent weeks, the administration has shifted focus to domestic policy to lower costs for American consumers and provide financial relief to families.

In July, The National Pulse reported that General Motors (GM) CEO Mary Barra had announced the company was in the process of moving billions of dollars of production back into the U.S., as well as retrofitting some of its American manufacturing facilities to produce more internal combustion engine autos instead of electric vehicles. Barra emphasized that the auto giant will likely undertake additional measures beyond an already planned $4 billion U.S. production investment, citing President Trump’s tariff policies as a primary driver behind the decision.

Image by Nicolás Boullosa.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pam Bondi Directs Federal Law Enforcement to Begin Probing Antifa for Tax Crimes, Domestic Terrorism.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memo directing law enforcement to investigate Antifa and other groups for potential domestic terrorism and tax crimes.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Pam Bondi, President Donald J. Trump, federal law enforcement agencies, and Antifa-related groups.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The memo was issued on Thursday and applies nationwide as part of Trump’s executive order.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These domestic terrorists use violence or the threat of violence to advance political and social agendas, including opposition to law and immigration enforcement,” Bondi wrote in the memo.

🎯IMPACT: Federal agencies are now prioritizing investigations into Antifa, with instructions to review files and coordinate intelligence with the FBI.

IN FULL

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a memo on Thursday to all federal prosecutors and law enforcement officials laying out a number of legal avenues to bring charges against Antifa and affiliated organizations. Among the possible legal actions suggested in Bondi’s memo are charges pertaining to domestic terrorism and tax crimes.

The memo comes in the wake of an Executive Order signed by President Donald J. Trump in September, which designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. Notably, the Attorney General gives federal law enforcement agencies 14 days to conduct internal reviews of criminal files for relevant intelligence that should be shared with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Bondi’s memo also urges officials to begin prioritizing Antifa-related crimes for prosecution.

“These domestic terrorists use violence or the threat of violence to advance political and social agendas, including opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity,” the Attorney General wrote. The Trump administration is also reportedly exploring ways to revoke the tax-exempt status of certain left-wing groups that are tied to Antifa.

In October, terrorism charges were filed against activists allegedly tied to a North Texas Antifa cell, following a protest where a police officer was shot. This marked the first time such charges were brought in connection with Antifa. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently designated four European Antifa groups as foreign terrorist organizations.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Whistleblowers Allege Tim Walz Knew of Somali COVID Fraud in 2019 But Failed to Investigate.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A fraud scheme involving the nonprofit Feeding Our Future siphoned over $1 billion in taxpayer money meant for pandemic relief, with Minnesota Department of Education whistleblowers alleging Democrat Governor Tim Walz’s administration knew of but failed to investigate the corruption.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Feeding Our Future, its founder Aimee Bock, and other co-conspirators, many of whom are Somali. Minnesota state officials and federal prosecutors are also involved, including Gov. Walz.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The fraud began in 2019 under the oversight of Minnesota’s Department of Education and escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic.

🎯IMPACT: The scheme diverted federal funds meant for children and vulnerable communities, with ongoing investigations and political scrutiny over state accountability.

IN FULL

Whistleblowers with the Minnesota Department of Education allege state officials first uncovered evidence of fraud involving the Feeding Our Future nonprofit organization in July 2019. However, Democrat Governor Tim Walz‘s administration backed down from investigating the group after intense pushback from Feeding Our Future’s leaders, who accused state officials of discrimination against Minnesota’s large Somali immigrant community.

The lack of action by Gov. Walz, the Democrats’ failed 2024 vice presidential candidate, and other state officials allowed Feeding Our Future to continue perpetrating a fraudulent scheme to divert over $1 billion in federal money to fund its leaders’ lavish lifestyles for several years, the whistleblowers allege. In January 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) raided the nonprofit, and it subsequently ceased operations. Initial charges were announced against 47 Feeding Our Future employees by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in September 2022, with the number of people indicted eventually increasing to 72.

According to the federal indictment, the nonprofit falsely claimed to have served 91 million meals to needy children during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the group receiving nearly $250 million in federal reimbursements. Notably, Feeding Our Future is accused of purposefully contracting with the state’s Somali immigrant community to shield itself from scrutiny by using allegations of “racism” against investigators.

Aimee Bock, founder of Feeding Our Future, was described as the mastermind behind the scheme. She and 60 others have been convicted, with investigations still ongoing. Bock’s attorney, Kenneth Udoibok, has denied allegations that she pressured state officials to bypass proper oversight, calling the claims a “lie.”

The scheme’s origins can be traced back to shortly after Walz took office in 2019. Initial tensions between state officials and Bock were documented, with employees noting unrealistic meal claims. By 2021, the fraud had ballooned, aided by relaxed safeguards during the pandemic. Feeding Our Future filed a lawsuit in 2020, accusing the state of discrimination, but the case was dismissed after the FBI launched its investigation in January 2022.

The National Pulse reported last week that the U.S. Treasury Department launched an investigation into allegations of mismanagement by Gov. Walz and the former Biden government, which allegedly allowed taxpayer dollars to be funneled by members of Minnesota’s Somali immigrant community to Islamist terrorist groups in their home country, including al-Qaeda franchise al-Shabaab.

Prosecutors have charged 87 individuals in connection with COVID-related fraud schemes in Minnesota, with 61 convictions so far. Investigations continue, with the total stolen amount exceeding $1 billion.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Fears NATO Allies Will Become Disloyal Partners as Mass Migration Turns Them ‘Majority Non-European.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. National Security Strategy document has raised concerns about European NATO members potentially becoming “majority non-European” and ceasing to be reliable allies in the future.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The strategy outlines President Donald J. Trump’s foreign policy priorities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The 33-page document was released on December 4.

🎯IMPACT: The report raises questions about future NATO loyalty to the United States.

IN FULL

The U.S. National Security Strategy released this week argues that demographic changes within Europe could, over time, reshape the political landscape of NATO. The document warns that some allied nations are projected to become “majority non-European,” which may eventually affect how those countries view their long-standing partnerships with America. According to the strategy, this shift could raise doubts about whether future European governments will approach the alliance in the same way as the original signatories of the NATO charter.

The 33-page report places heavy emphasis on mass migration, both into the United States and Europe. It frames population movements as a strategic concern, linking long-term demographic change to questions of national cohesion and geopolitical alignment. While focused primarily on U.S. security priorities, the text highlights migration trends in Europe as one factor that could alter alliances if political identities continue to shift.

These concerns echo a series of warnings from President Donald J. Trump and his administration, who have frequently criticized Europe’s migration policies. Throughout 2025, Trump repeatedly argued that uncontrolled mass migration was reshaping the continent in ways that threatened its cultural foundations. In a July interview, he said that Europe was being killed by immigration and declared, “You’re not going to have Europe anymore,” describing the influx as a “horrible invasion.”

In November, Trump praised Hungary’s hard-line immigration approach to immigration as migrants were “flooding Europe” elsewhere and driving up crime rates. He contrasted Hungary’s policies with those of Western European governments, insisting that countries enforcing strict border controls were preserving “what Europe should be.”

Around the same time, officials in the Trump administration issued additional warnings to U.S. allies, arguing that large-scale migration posed an “existential threat to the West” and would erode shared cultural and political foundations if not addressed.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Virginia House Speaker Proposes Redistricting for 10-1 Democratic Majority.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Virginia’s House Speaker has suggested redrawing Congressional maps to favor Democrats with a 10-1 advantage.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Virginia House Speaker Don Scott (D) and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday, December 3, 2025, at the UVA Center for Politics.

💬KEY QUOTE: “He’s bullying folks in these states to change the rules, and we have an obligation to stand up and do something different.” – Don Scott

🎯IMPACT: The proposed maps could shift the balance of Virginia’s Congressional delegation, though given the state’s population distribution and close partisan party registration, a 10-1 congressional map is unlikely to be realized.

IN FULL

Virginia House Speaker Don Scott says he’s considering a plan to redraw the state’s Congressional maps in a way that could give Democrats a significant advantage, potentially shifting the current 6-5 delegation in favor of Republicans to a 10-1 Democratic majority.

Speaking at the UVA Center for Politics on Wednesday, December 3, Scott outlined the proposal as a response to what he described as “bullying” by President Donald J. Trump in states like Texas. “He’s bullying folks in these states to change the rules, and we have an obligation to stand up and do something different,” Scott said.

The suggestion comes amidst ongoing efforts by both major political parties to redraw state maps ahead of upcoming elections, including the midterms next year. Scott indicated that such a dramatic shift in the delegation’s composition “was not out of the realm” of possibility under the new maps.

However, given that Democrats only enjoyed a slight advantage in state-wide elections, and Virginia‘s population distribution—with a bulk of Democrat voters living in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. in the north of the state—Scott’s idea of a 10-1 map appears more of an exaggerated threat than a possible reality. Redrawing congressional lines in a manner that gives Democrats such an advantage would likely draw considerable legal challenges, as the districts would likely lack compactness, contiguity, and equal population.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pentagon Announces Another Drug Boat Strike.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Pentagon announced on Friday that the U.S. military executed a strike on a boat suspected of transporting illegal narcotics, resulting in four fatalities.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Navy Admiral Frank Bradley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The strike occurred on Thursday in the eastern Pacific.

🎯IMPACT: The legality of these military actions is being challenged by Congressional Democrats, some of whom have claimed they are tantamount to war crimes.

IN FULL

The Pentagon has announced another strike by the U.S. military on a vessel carrying illegal drugs, resulting in the deaths of four narco-terrorists. Notably, the operation occurred in the eastern Pacific, while most of the strikes since September have targeted cartel drug boats in the Caribbean.

On Thursday, Admiral Frank Bradley—the head of the United States Special Operations Command—and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine appeared before a closed-door joint meeting of the House Armed Services Committee and Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Thursday to brief lawmakers on the recent strikes. A particular focus of the briefing was the initial September 2 strike, with Democrats and The Washington Post falsely claiming Secretary of War Pete Hegseth authorized a so-called “double tap strike” on a group of survivors with the order to “kill everybody.”

However, Admiral Bradley told the joint committee hearing that he was the authorizing official for both the initial strike and secondary strike, and that Sec. Hegseth never gave an order to “kill everybody.” Importantly, the Special Operations Command chief provided a video showing the two cartel operatives who survived the initial strike climb onto the wreckage and begin gathering the vessel’s cargo. Bradley stated that it appeared the two survivors were attempting to contact other nearby cartel boats in an effort to salvage the drug shipment. At this juncture, the survivors were deemed to be “still in the fight” and valid targets.

Notably, secondary strikes are not against the rules of engagement, and the practice saw widespread use under the Obama-Biden government. Still, Congressional Democrats continue to insist the follow-up attack was unwarranted. “What I saw in that room was one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service,” Representative Jim Himes (D-CT), the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said after the briefing. He conceded, “Yes, they were carrying drugs,” but insisted, “They were not in the position to continue their mission in any way.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

FBI Director: Biden Govt ‘Incompetent’ and ‘Negligent’ in Pipe Bomb Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel criticized the former Biden government’s handling of the investigation into the January 5, 2021, pipe bomb suspect, accusing the prior administration of neglecting evidence for years.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kash Patel, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI agents, and suspect Brian Cole Jr.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation was revived recently, leading to an arrest in northern Virginia on Thursday. The suspect is tied to events near the U.S. Capitol on January 5-6, 2021.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This guy… planted bombs at the United States Capitol on camera. And the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the prior four years couldn’t find him. Completely unacceptable.” – Kash Patel

🎯IMPACT: The case’s revival led to the identification and arrest of a suspect, with further charges expected, highlighting significant investigative efforts by the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ).

IN FULL

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel on Thursday criticized the former Biden government for its handling of the investigation into the pipe bombs planted near the U.S. Capitol on January 5, 2021. Patel accused the prior Democrat administration of having ignored key evidence in its possession for four years.

“We went back and looked at the cellphone tower data dumps. We went back and looked at the providers and what information they provided pursuant to search warrants at the time and asked questions such as why weren’t all the phone numbers scrubbed, why aren’t they connected, and why wasn’t there any geolocational data done?” Patel said during a television appearance late Thursday. “That is either sheer incompetence or complete intentional negligence—and neither of which is acceptable for this FBI.”

The comments came after the FBI arrested Brian Cole Jr. of Woodbridge, Virginia, for allegedly planting two pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National Committees’ headquarters on the evening of January 5, 2021. Patel emphasized the importance of basic law enforcement techniques, such as analyzing tips, interviews, and evidence, including the suspect’s unique Nike sneakers.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi echoed Patel’s criticism on Friday, stating, “This case languished. It sat there for four years collecting dust. No one did anything to solve this. Both bombs were real… and thankfully they didn’t detonate.” Bondi credited Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino for reviving the investigation and keeping it confidential until an arrest was made.

Cole has been charged with the use of an explosive device, with more charges expected.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

RFK Jr Panel Votes to End This Day-of-Birth Vaccination for Newborns.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine advisory committee voted to end the longstanding recommendation for all U.S. newborns to receive the hepatitis B vaccine on their day of birth.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), and acting CDC Director Jim O’Neill.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The vote took place Friday, following a delayed meeting earlier in the week.

🎯IMPACT: The recommendation, if adopted by the CDC, could shift vaccine policies, influence state guidelines, and impact insurance coverage.

IN FULL

A vaccine advisory panel appointed by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has voted to recommend dropping the long-standing policy of injecting every U.S. newborn with the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. Under the new proposal, the shot would be given only to infants whose mothers are known to have hepatitis B or whose status is unknown. For all others, the choice would be left to parents and their physicians.

If parents decline the birth dose, the committee recommends starting the hepatitis B series no sooner than two months of age. Panel members contended that most newborns are at very low risk and questioned whether earlier studies adequately examined possible long-term side effects of vaccinated infants so early.

The decision came after a turbulent meeting in which the wording of the recommendation was changed repeatedly. This pushed the vote from Thursday to Friday.

Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic, revamped the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) this year, removing all 17 previous members and replacing them with eight new ones dedicated to “evidence-based medicine” and “common sense.” Several of the appointees have previously voiced skepticism about vaccines.

Acting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Jim O’Neill will now decide whether to adopt the panel’s recommendation. Although ACIP guidelines are not mandatory, they heavily influence state requirements, pediatric practice, and insurance reimbursement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Grand Jury Refuses to Re-Indict Letitia James in Mortgage Fraud Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal grand jury rejected a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attempt to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia “Tish” James (D) following a judge’s dismissal of the previous case.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Letitia James, former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey, U.S. District Court Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, and former interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Norfolk, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.; the grand jury decision occurred on Thursday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is time for this unchecked weaponization of our justice system to stop.” – Letitia James

🎯IMPACT: The rejection marks another setback for the Justice Department and is drawing allegations of two-tiered justice, as President Donald J. Trump was pursued by James on similar charges.

IN FULL

A federal grand jury rejected the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) attempt to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) after a judge dismissed the previous mortgage fraud prosecution over a technicality pertaining to the appointment of now former interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan. Prosecutors had returned to the grand jury following Halligan’s disqualification, seeking a new indictment.

James was initially indicted in early October on charges of bank fraud and making false statements related to a 2020 home purchase in Norfolk, Virginia. Prosecutors alleged that James rented out the property after signing a document agreeing to use it as a personal residence, which allowed her to secure favorable loan terms. James has denied the allegations, calling them a politically motivated attack.

In response to the grand jury’s decision, James stated, “It is time for this unchecked weaponization of our justice system to stop.” Her attorney, Abbe Lowell—who has represented a number of Democrat clients, including Hunter Biden—added, “If they continue, undeterred by a court ruling and a grand jury’s rejection of the charges, it will be a shocking assault on the rule of law and a devastating blow to the integrity of our justice system.”

The initial case was dismissed last month by U.S. District Court Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, who ruled that Lindsey Halligan’s appointment as a U.S. Attorney was improper. At the time, Halligan was overseeing the prosecutions of both James and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey.

Despite the dismissal, prosecutors are reportedly planning to seek another indictment.

Image by Maryland GovPics.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Congressional Redistricting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) allowed Texas to redraw its electoral map, adding up to five likely Republican-controlled House districts.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Supreme Court, Texas state officials, and the Democratic and Republican parties.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was handed down on Thursday, impacting electoral districts in Texas.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling boosts the GOP’s chances of preserving its Congressional majority while highlighting the ongoing partisan battles over redistricting.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with Texas, permitting the state to implement a new congressional map that creates as many as five additional Republican-leaning House districts. The ruling reverses a lower-court decision that had found the map illegally dismantled majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering.

The decision markedly improves Republicans’ odds of holding their House majority in future cycles. However, the Democrats are pursuing parallel tactics: a new California map is projected to net them multiple seats. This decision is being challenged in the courts by the California GOP and the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ), which contend that the Golden State is racially gerrymandering the new districts in favor of Democrat-leaning Hispanic voters. “Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did,” the DOJ argues.

The recurring redistricting fights highlight how deeply partisan the process has become. Although some advocate for independent, nonpartisan map-drawing commissions, those reforms have struggled to gain traction. As one attorney with the American Constitution Society observed, a party that unilaterally disarmed from redistricting would be “bringing a knife to a gun fight.”

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.