The Senate has confirmed former Texas state representative and professional football player Scott Turner as Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a vote of 55-44. Turner, who served on the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council during President Donald J. Trump’s first term, is now responsible for supporting roughly 4.3 million low-income families through various programs, including public housing, rental subsidies, and vouchers.
During his appearance before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, Turner outlined his vision to mend policy failures, reduce dependency on government assistance, and focus on increasing housing construction.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
“As a country, we’re not building enough housing,” he said. “We need millions more homes of all kinds, single family, apartments, condos, duplexes, manufactured housing, you name it, so individuals and families can have a roof over their heads and a place to call home.”
He further expressed his commitment to “help people get off government assistance, become self-sustainable, and achieve the American dream.”
During President Trump’s first term, HUD was led by Dr. Ben Carson.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Trump administration is intensifying its efforts against drug cartels by targeting them before they reach U.S. soil.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and cartels and crime syndicates designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs), including Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Recent press conference in Mexico and ongoing operations in the Southern Caribbean Sea near Venezuela.
💬KEY QUOTE: “What will stop them is when you blow them up. You get rid of them.” – Marco Rubio
🎯IMPACT: The U.S. has launched a new offensive against narco-terrorist organizations, signaling a shift in strategy to preemptively strike cartel operations.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump’s administration is intensifying its approach to combating international drug trafficking, shifting focus from interception at the U.S. border to proactive military action abroad. Secretary of State Marco Rubio outlined the new strategy during a press conference in Mexico, stating that the United States will now strike drug traffickers before they reach American soil.
“Interdiction doesn’t work because these drug cartels, what they do is they know they’re going to lose two percent of their cargo. They bake it into their economics,” Rubio said. “What will stop them is when you blow them up. You get rid of them.”
Rubio referenced a recent military operation in which U.S. intelligence tracked a drug boat associated with the Venezuelan criminal organization Tren de Aragua. “Instead of interdicting it, on the President’s orders, we blew it up, and it will happen again. Maybe it’s happening right now, I don’t know,” he said. The strike was carried out in the Southern Caribbean and resulted in the deaths of 11 traffickers. No U.S. personnel were harmed.
President Trump later confirmed the military action and warned drug traffickers: “Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE!”
The move follows the deployment of U.S. military forces to waters near Venezuela, a country the administration accuses of harboring and supporting hostile criminal networks. Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who is under a $50 million U.S. bounty for alleged cartel connections, condemned the strike and called it “the biggest threat” to regional stability in a century.
In addition to military actions, Trump has legally escalated his anti-cartel policy. In early 2025, he signed an executive order designating multiple transnational criminal groups, including the Sinaloa Cartel, Jalisco New Generation Cartel, MS-13, and Tren de Aragua, as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs). This designation took effect in February and marked a historic shift in how the U.S. classifies and targets cartels.
Trump also attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to authorize the detention and deportation of cartel members in the U.S., particularly those linked to Tren de Aragua. A federal court later ruled that the application of the law was unlawful, but this may be appealed, and removals continue under separate laws.
The Trump administration’s aggressive posture follows a series of violent cartel incidents, including a January firefight in Starr County, Texas, where Mexican cartel operatives opened fire on U.S. Border Patrol agents. Officials described the encounter as part of a growing trend of cross-border attacks.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump suggested deploying federal troops to New Orleans, Louisiana, to address crime in the Democrat stronghold.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry (R), and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell (D).
📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made September 3 in the Oval Office, referencing New Orleans and other cities.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re going to be going to maybe Louisiana, and you have New Orleans, which has a crime problem. We’ll straighten that out in about two weeks.” – Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: A Washington, D.C.-style federal crackdown in New Orleans could achieve a similarly dramatic decrease in crime.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has floated the idea of deploying federal troops to New Orleans in response to rising crime in the city, similar to his ongoing federal crackdown on crime in Washington, D.C. Speaking from the Oval Office on September 3, Trump said, “We’re going to be going to maybe Louisiana, and you have New Orleans, which has a crime problem. We’ll straighten that out in about two weeks. It’ll take us two weeks, easier than D.C.”
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, a Republican, welcomed the proposal, posting a clip of Trump’s remarks on X (formerly Twitter) and writing, “We will take President [Donald Trump’s] help from New Orleans to Shreveport!”
While Republicans control the state government in Louisiana, New Orleans is a Democratic stronghold, voting for former Vice President Kamala Harris by over 80 percent in 2024 and electing Democrat LaToya Cantrell as Mayor.
Trump has previously used federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to address violent crime and civil unrest in major cities. In Washington, D.C., he recently federalized the Metropolitan Police Department for 30 days and deployed Guardsmen and federal law enforcement personnel to assist them, a move that saw more than 700 arrests and a sharp drop in violent crime.
A recent poll found that most voters supported the D.C. crackdown, with 54 percent calling it “justified and necessary.” Support was especially strong among Republicans, but nearly half of independents and even over a quarter of Democrats agreed with the move. Trump has said similar strategies could soon be rolled out in cities like other Democrat-run crime hotspots like Chicago and New York.
Earlier this year, Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, California, during pro-illegal immigrant riots faced legal challenges, with lawyers for Governor Gavin Newsom (D) arguing it violated laws limiting military involvement in domestic law enforcement. The matter is still being fought out in the courts.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Plans to phase out all childhood vaccine mandates have been announced by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R), alongside the creation of a state-level “Make America Healthy Again” commission.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor DeSantis, state Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, and DeSantis’s wife, Casey.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced September 3 in Valrico, Florida, during a news conference in the Tampa area.
💬KEY QUOTE: “They don’t have the right to tell you what to put in your body. Take it away from them.” – Dr. Joseph Ladapo
🎯IMPACT: If implemented, Florida would become the first state to eliminate such extensive vaccine mandates, with a broader “medical freedom package” expected in the next legislative session.
IN FULL
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) announced on September 3 that his administration will begin phasing out all childhood vaccine mandates, marking a significant shift in public health policy. The move, unveiled during a press conference in Valrico, near Tampa, builds on an ongoing push to limit government intervention in personal medical decisions.
State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo strongly criticized current vaccine requirements, calling them an “immoral” intrusion on individual rights and likening them to “slavery.” He framed the policy shift as a matter of personal and parental autonomy. “People have a right to make their own decisions, informed decisions,” Ladapo said. “They don’t have the right to tell you what to put in your body. Take it away from them.”
While the Florida Department of Health has the authority to eliminate some vaccine mandates, removing others, such as those for measles, chickenpox, and polio, required for school and daycare, will require legislative approval. DeSantis confirmed that the ultimate goal is to end all state-level vaccine mandates for children.
Alongside the mandate phase-out, DeSantis also launched a “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) commission, a Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-inspired state panel aimed at promoting informed consent, parental rights, and questioning entrenched medical norms. The commission will be chaired by Lt. Gov. Jay Collins (R) and First Lady Casey DeSantis. “We’re getting government out of the way, getting government out of your lives,” Collins said during the event. The MAHA commission’s recommendations will form the basis for introducing a broader “medical freedom package” during the next legislative session. “There will be a broad package,” DeSantis said, underscoring his administration’s stance against federal health mandates.
Florida’s push aligns with growing national scrutiny of vaccine policy, including recent high-profile actions taken by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In June, Kennedy “retired” all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), saying the panel had become compromised by conflicts of interest and had lost public trust.
Kennedy Jr. argued the committee served as “little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine.” Later that month, he withdrew U.S. funding from a global vaccine initiative backed by Bill Gates.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is set to request the Supreme Court to overturn a $5 million verdict in a civil case funded by a Democrat megadonor, where he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The case involves President Trump and writer E. Jean Carroll.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Application for review submitted on September 3, 2025, with the petition seeking an extension until November 10.
💬KEY QUOTE: “President Trump intends to seek review by this Court of significant issues arising from the Second Circuit’s erroneous decision,” stated the president’s counsel.
🎯IMPACT: Trump continues to challenge the verdict, asserting that various lawsuits against him are politically motivated.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump is expected to approach the Supreme Court in an attempt to reverse a $5 million verdict from a civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll. The 2023 lawsuit saw a $5 million jury verdict that held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming the writer and alleged fabulist. Carroll accused Trump of raping her nearly 30 years ago in a prestigious department store, in changing rooms that are usually locked and attended by staff. He has consistently denied the allegations.
Carroll, who could not recall even the year of the alleged attack with confidence, has accused at least seven other men and boys of assaulting her in unrelated cases over several decades.
In an application to the Supreme Court, Trump’s legal team wrote, “President Trump intends to seek review by this Court of significant issues arising from the Second Circuit’s erroneous decision.” The petition also requests an extension until November 10, allowing more time to formally ask for the case to be heard by the nation’s highest court.
The case has been part of Trump’s continued legal battles. Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $83 million in a second civil trial, a decision that Trump is also appealing.
Trump claims that the lawsuits he faces are driven by political motives. Notably, a dubious civil fraud verdict against the America First leader in a case brought by Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James was recently thrown out on appeal.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: An effort to censure Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was blocked after some Republicans joined Democrats to vote against it.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), and several other Republicans and Democrats in the House.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 3, 2025, in the U.S. House of Representatives.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m going to have some conversations with my colleagues, with Ms. McIver in particular, and some of our leadership.” – Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY)
🎯IMPACT: The censure resolution against McIver was tabled, creating uncertainty as to whether a similar measure against Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) will proceed.
IN FULL
A censure resolution aimed at Representative LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was thwarted in the House after a coalition of Democrats and Republicans-in-name-only (RINOs) voted against it. The resolution, initiated by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), sought to reprimand McIver for her involvement in the alleged assault of federal law enforcement officers outside an immigration detention center in May.
Five Republicans, including Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Mike Flood (R-NE) joined Democrats in voting to table the measure. =Reps. Dave Joyce (R-OH), Mike Turner (R-OH), and David Valadao (R-CA) also voted for the table motion. Two other Republicans, Reps. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) and Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) opted to vote present. Rep. Turner claimed after the roll call that he inadvertently voted to kill the censure measure, though his vote would not have changed the final outcome.
The incident in question occurred during an oversight visit to a Newark, New Jersey, facility, where McIver and other Democratic officials were present and ended up physically interfering with law enforcement. Federal agents arrested the city’s mayor, Ras Baraka, and charges against McIver were eventually brought by acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba, accusing the Congresswoman of assaulting federal agents.
McIver has denied all allegations, with her legal team asserting that federal agents’ actions led to an “unnecessary, reckless, and disproportionate escalation” at the scene.
The failed censure of McIver has prompted Democrats to consider withdrawing a similar resolution brought against Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) in retaliation, as they weigh their next steps. Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), who is the sponsor of the censure measure against Mills, said after the McIver vote: “I’m going to have some conversations with my colleagues, with Ms. McIver in particular, and some of our leadership, and we’ll make that determination.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States is projected to experience its first-ever population decline due to a significant drop in immigration numbers.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), President Donald J. Trump, and the U.S. State Department.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Forecasts for 2025, across the United States.
🎯IMPACT: A potential population decrease of 6,000 people, with a 96 percent drop in net immigration at the low end of predictions.
IN FULL
The United States could see its population shrink for the first time in history, as new forecasts predict a dramatic drop in immigration numbers. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) has projected that net international immigration could fall to as low as negative 525,000 in 2025. With a net of 519,000 births reported in last year’s Census, this would result in a population decrease of 6,000 people.
The AEI forecast suggests net immigration could plummet from 2.8 million to between 115,000 and negative 525,000, marking a 96 percent decline at the low end of predictions. Notably, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that 1.6 million illegal immigrants have voluntarily left the U.S. since President Donald J. Trump returned to the White House. Additionally, DHS figures reveal that over 359,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested, and 332,000 deported, within the first 200 days of the new administration.
The U.S. State Department has also implemented a new policy subjecting visa holders to “continuous vetting.” This includes reviewing the records of 55 million foreigners with valid U.S. visas to determine if they have violated any rules. If infractions such as overstaying visas or engaging in criminal activity are discovered, visas may be revoked, potentially leading to deportation. A statement from the department emphasized, “We review all available information as part of our vetting, including law enforcement or immigration records of any other information that comes to light after visa issuance indicating a potential liability.”
The policy shift represents a significant escalation in curbing mass migration and in deportation efforts aimed at removing millions of illegal immigrants who entered the United States under the former Biden government.
President Trump’s administration has also increased restrictions and requirements for visa applicants, including mandatory in-person interviews, in light of new national security and public safety concerns.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal appeals court ruled that President Donald J. Trump cannot use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Tuesday, September 3, 2025, in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “A country’s encouraging its residents and citizens to enter this country illegally is not the modern-day equivalent of sending an armed, organized force to occupy, to disrupt, or to otherwise harm the United States,” the court wrote in its ruling.
🎯IMPACT: The decision blocks the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal immigrants, though other legal avenues for deportation remain available.
IN FULL
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that President Donald J. Trump cannot use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelan illegal immigrant members of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang. The administration had invoked the 18th-century wartime law in March to deport 137 alleged gang members to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).
The law allows presidents to deport people from enemy countries during an “invasion or predatory incursion.” However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the activities of the TdA gang do not constitute an “invasion” or “predatory incursion.” The court stated, “There is no finding that this mass immigration was an armed, organized force or forces.”
Since retaking office in January, the Trump administration has deported over 6,000 Venezuelans, including 238 sent to CECOT earlier this year. Family members and illegal immigrant advocates claim that many of those deported have no criminal record or gang ties—though evidence from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) suggests otherwise.
The case originated with illegal immigrants detained in Texas who sued to block their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. After the lower court dismissed the case, the Supreme Court intervened, ruling that the Fifth Circuit was wrong to dismiss the matter and that illegal immigrants had not been given adequate notice of their deportations.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Utah announced a settlement action and consent order against a number of adult content websites, including Pornhub and RedTube, that are operated by Aylo (formerly MindGeek).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Christopher Mufarrige, Utah state officials, Pornhub, RedTube, YouPorn, and Aylo.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The FTC announced the settlement action and consent order on Wednesday, September 3, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Pornhub’s operators turned a blind eye to the proliferation of videos depicting the sexual abuse of children on its sites so it could profit off this exploitation. Under the order we’re announcing today, Pornhub’s operators will be required to take concrete steps to block this harmful content and ensure that those who appear in videos on their sites are consenting adults.” — Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection
🎯IMPACT: The settlement action and consent order impose a $15 million federal fine against Aylo, which will be suspended if the company pays a lesser $5 million fine to Utah. Additionally, Aylo will be required to no longer misrepresent its policies regarding child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and nonconsensual material (NCM).
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump‘s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on Wednesday that it will join Utah in a settlement action and consent order against a number of adult content websites, including Pornhub and RedTube. The Utah Attorney General’s office and the FTC contend the websites “deceived users by doing little to block tens of thousands of videos and photos featuring child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and nonconsensual material (NCM) despite claiming that this content was ‘strictly prohibited.'”
“Pornhub’s operators turned a blind eye to the proliferation of videos depicting the sexual abuse of children on its sites so it could profit off this exploitation,” the FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Christopher Mufarrige, said in a statement. He continued: “Under the order we’re announcing today, Pornhub’s operators will be required to take concrete steps to block this harmful content and ensure that those who appear in videos on their sites are consenting adults.”
FTC Commissioner Melissa Holyoak accused the adult content websites of having “inflicted grave harm on children and nonconsenting adults by promoting and distributing truly horrific material online.” She added: “As today’s complaint and proposed order make clear, the FTC will use every tool in its arsenal to stop such outrageous conduct.”
The proposed settlement and consent order take direct action against Pornhub’s parent company, Aylo—formerly known as MindGeek—which operates more than 100 pornographic photo and video-streaming websites. Among Aylo’s largest pornographic website properties are Pornhub, YouPorn, and RedTube, which boast hundreds of millions of monthly visitors in the United States alone.
Utah and the FTC contend that Aylo “deceived users by claiming it has zero tolerance for CSAM and works to block CSAM and NCM on its sites by, among other things, taking prompt action when videos are flagged by users.” However, in reality, the company—according to Utah’s complaint—failed to take any concrete action to remove flagged content, ban uploaders of CSAM, or prevent the reupload of removed content.
The settlement action and consent order impose a $15 million federal fine against Aylo, which will be suspended if the company pays a lesser $5 million fine to Utah. Additionally, Aylo will be required to no longer misrepresent its policies regarding CSAM and NCM.
Other provisions include a requirement for Aylo to enact “a program to prevent the publication or dissemination of CSAM and NCM content,” a thorough verification system for those appearing in uploaded content, and to remove offending content uploaded prior to the “implementation of the CSAM and NCM prevention program.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Liberal Police Department in Kansas has reportedly refused to assist in locating an illegal immigrant fugitive wanted for child rape if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is involved in the case.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Democrat Mayor Jose Lara, fugitive Guatemalan illegal alien Juan Ralios-Batz, the Liberal Police Department, U.S. Marshals, and federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The case is ongoing in Liberal, Kansas, with connections to Nebraska. The crimes occurred over the past two years.
🎯IMPACT: The refusal to cooperate with ICE could hinder efforts to capture a foreign fugitive wanted for heinous crimes, raising concerns about public safety and immigration law enforcement.
IN FULL
The local police department in Liberal, Kansas, has stated it will no longer assist a U.S. Marshals Task Force in locating an illegal immigrant fugitive wanted for the rape and impregnation of a teenage minor if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) becomes involved in the investigation. The fugitive, Juan Ralios-Batz, a Guatemalan national believed to be 40 years old, is accused of repeatedly raping a female 13-year-old unaccompanied alien child (UAC) over two years.
Liberal Mayor Jose Lara (D) reportedly has a history of opposing federal immigration enforcement. Federal sources now say he has barred the Liberal Police Department from working with ICE in any capacity.
Notably, the teenage victim in the case—who authorities believe may have been trafficked into the U.S.—was impregnated by Ralios-Batz. The minor crossed into the U.S. illegally under the Biden government after being sponsored by the fugitive’s sister.
Ralios-Batz is wanted on multiple charges, including three counts of child rape, aggravated kidnapping, human trafficking, and child abuse. Federal sources disclosed that he unlawfully reentered the U.S. after a previous deportation, and his family may have helped him relocate to Nebraska to evade capture. A relative of his is already serving jail time for the rape of another unaccompanied alien child.
Federal investigators also discovered that several illegal immigrants interviewed during the search for Ralios-Batz had obtained REAL IDs using Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) issued under the Biden government. These documents were reportedly granted without rigorous verification of identity.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A House Judiciary Committee hearing transformed into a debate over online content rules and their impact on Western values after Reform Party leader Nigel Farage testified on the erosion of free speech rights in the United Kingdom.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, Jim Jordan (R-OH), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), and others.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 3, 2025, at a House Judiciary Committee hearing.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’ve kind of forgotten the Voltairian principles that we will fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom.” – Nigel Farage
🎯IMPACT: The hearing intensified the debate on censorship in the United Kingdom and online speech regulations.
IN FULL
Testimony to the House Judiciary Committee by Nigel Farage, leader of Britain’s populist Reform Party, on the state of free speech in his country on Wednesday quickly turned into a debate over online content rules and their impact on Western freedoms. Farage raised cases like those of Graham Linehan, an Irish comedy writer arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport for social media posts about transgenderism that he sent while in the United States, and Lucy Connolly, a mother of young children imprisoned for making unflattering comments about asylum seekers in the wake of a mass stabbing in Southport, England.
“We’ve kind of forgotten the Voltairian principles that we will fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom,” Farage told the committee, chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).
Of Linehan’s case in particular, he stressed, “He’s not even a British citizen. He’s an Irish citizen. This could happen to any American man or woman that goes to Heathrow that has said things online that the British government and British police don’t like,” adding: “At what point did we become North Korea? Well, I think [Linehan] found that out two days ago.”
Farage criticized Britain’s new Online Safety Act and similar censorship regulations in the European Union (EU), warning Europe was falling into an “awful, authoritarian situation” and cautioning America not to go down the same path.
Committee member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who has clashed with Farage before, attempted to undermine the Brexit champion, suggesting he did not really believe in free speech because he once opposed allowing pro-Palestinian protesters to demonstrate practically on top of a Remembrance Sunday service honoring Britain’s war dead. Raskin also interrogated Farage over his party supposedly not giving interviews or press credentials to certain media outlets and journalists, although the Democrat failed to explain how this would be comparable to law enforcement arresting social media users for “grossly offensive” posts.
The hearing is ongoing…
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
