Thursday, January 22, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Russia-Linked Arsonists Convicted of Burning Down Ukraine Aid Warehouse.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Three men have been found guilty of an arson attack on a warehouse in London, England, in connection with the Ukraine war, causing approximately £1 million (~$1.36m) in damage.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nii Mensah, Jakeem Rose, and Ugnius Asmena were convicted. Ringleaders Dylan Earl and Jake Reeves admitted to aggravated arson and were linked to Russia’s Wagner Group.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred on March 20, 2023, at an industrial unit in Leyton, London.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This case is a clear example of an organisation linked to the Russian state using ‘proxies’ to carry out very serious criminal activity.” – Commander Dominic Murphy

🎯IMPACT: The case marks the first convictions under the National Security Act 2023 for saboteurs acting on behalf of the Wagner Group.

IN FULL

Three men have been convicted of setting fire to a warehouse in London, England, which was linked to Ukraine aid efforts. The arson attack, carried out on March 20, 2023, caused the equivalent of over a million dollars in damages. England’s High Court heard that the attack was orchestrated on behalf of the Wagner Group, a Russian private military company (PMC).

Nii Mensah and Jakeem Rose set fire to the building while Ugnius Asmena waited in a car. Dylan Earl planned the attack with assistance from Jake Reeves, who targeted the warehouse due to its role in supplying Starlink equipment and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Both Earl and Reeves admitted to aggravated arson and charges.

Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the London Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, stated: “The warehouse arson put members of the public at great risk, and it was only by good fortune nobody was seriously injured or worse.” He added that the case demonstrates how foreign entities, such as the Wagner Group, use local proxies to carry out acts of sabotage.

Evidence presented during the trial included phone data, CCTV footage, and videos of the fire. Mensah and Rose were recorded climbing over a wall to approach the warehouse and later fled the scene. Messages between the perpetrators revealed their awareness of the damage caused, with Mensah texting Earl: “Bro lol it’s on the news … we dun damages [sic].”

The court also heard of additional plots by Earl and Reeves to target businesses and individuals critical of the Russian government, including the high-profile Russian dissident Evgeny Chichvarkin. The defendants will be sentenced later this year.

Earlier this year, a Wagner Group mercenary was arrested crossing illegally into the United States from Mexico. He was found with a drone, two passports, and around $4,000.

Russia is suspected of being linked to other possible acts of sabotage in Western countries, including exploding packages on cargo planes.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Takes On Big Business in Affordability Push: ‘Homes Are For People, Not Corporations.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced new measures aimed at addressing housing affordability for Americans, including restrictions on the purchase of homes by large investment firms and hedge funds.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, large institutional investors, single-family home buyers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and attendees of the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on January 21, 2026, at the WEF meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Homes are built for people, not for corporations, and America will not become a nation of renters.” — President Trump

🎯IMPACT: While the Executive Order does not ban outright large institutional investors’ ability to acquire single-family homes, President Trump’s directive places strict limits on conventional mortgage guarantees sought by investment firms when purchasing single-family residences.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump, speaking at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday, announced new measures aimed at addressing housing affordability for Americans, including restrictions on the purchase of homes by large investment firms and hedge funds. Late Tuesday, President Trump signed an Executive Order that restricts federal agencies from facilitating the financing or insuring of single-family homes by “large institutional investors.”

“Homes are built for people, not for corporations, and America will not become a nation of renters,” President Trump told WEF attendees. “That’s why I have signed an executive order banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. It’s just not fair to the public. They’re not able to buy a house.”

While the housing policy Executive Order does not ban large institutional investors from acquiring single-family homes outright, the directive places strict limits on conventional mortgage guarantees sought by investment firms when purchasing single-family residences. Notably, the measure does not impact cash buyers or investment firms that use financing not backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The National Pulse reported in June of 2024 that under the former Biden government, mortgage costs began to rise once again—mostly due to inflation—and caused a spike in foreclosures. This resulted in a flood of residential property sales that drew significant interest from alternative asset management firms, such as Blackstone, which purchased these properties to generate a steady stream of rental revenue for their investors.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DHS Officers Rammed By Illegal Immigrant, Shots Fired.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal agent opened fire in Southern California after a criminal illegal immigrant rammed law enforcement with his vehicle in an attempt to evade arrest.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) law enforcement officers and William Eduardo Moran Carballo, a criminal illegal immigrant from El Salvador.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday morning in Compton, California.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired defensive shots.” – DHS spokesman

🎯IMPACT: The suspect was apprehended without harm, but a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer sustained injuries.

IN FULL

A federal agent fired his weapon during a law enforcement operation in Compton, California, on Wednesday after a suspect used his vehicle to strike officers while attempting to avoid arrest, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The incident occurred during a targeted operation to apprehend William Eduardo Moran Carballo, a Salvadoran national accused of involvement in human smuggling. DHS said Carballo had previously been arrested twice for inflicting corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant and was the subject of a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge in 2019.

“In a dangerous attempt to evade arrest, this criminal illegal alien weaponized his vehicle and rammed law enforcement. Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired defensive shots,” a DHS spokesman said. Authorities said the suspect was not hit by the gunfire and fled on foot before being taken into custody. A Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer was injured during the encounter, while the suspect was unharmed.

DHS, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), argued that sanctuary policies and ongoing violent anti-ICE protests have emboldened criminals to resist arrest. “These dangerous attempts to evade arrest have surged since sanctuary politicians, including Governor [Gavin] Newsom, have encouraged illegal aliens to evade arrest and provided guides advising illegal aliens how to recognize ICE, block entry, and defy arrest,” the agency said. The agency noted there has been a 3,200 percent increase in vehicle attacks against law enforcement.

The Compton confrontation comes amid a series of recent attacks targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and other federal officers. In one case, federal authorities offered a $15,000 reward for information leading to the capture of an illegal immigrant accused of ramming ICE agents with a vehicle. In another case, an illegal immigrant received a 20-year federal prison sentence for a violent assault on an ICE officer.

Additional incidents have included a California professor accused of attacking ICE agents with tear gas and a reported 1,000 percent increase in assaults on ICE personnel following a sniper attack, according to federal officials.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Dem Leaders Move to Block Funding for ICE, DHS.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA) announced a decision to vote against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hakeem Jeffries, Katherine Clark, Rep. Enrique “Henry” Cuellar (D-TX), and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was made on Wednesday, January 21, 2026, in a closed-door meeting of House Democrats.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I signed off. Let’s go. Let’s move. And people will decide what they want to.” – Rep. Rosa DeLauro.

🎯IMPACT: The bill is expected to pass despite some Democratic opposition, with a group of moderate lawmakers expected to support it.

IN FULL

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA) informed Democrats in a private meeting that they intend to vote against a bill funding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The move is largely seen as an attempt by Democrat leaders to placate a large bloc of their more progressive caucus members who are demanding the agency be defunded over ongoing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations targeting illegal immigrants across the country.

Despite their stated opposition, the Democratic leaders are not expected to actively whip against the bill. While a bulk of Democrats are anticipated to oppose the appropriations measure, it is expected that a small group of moderate Democrats will still support it. More radical progressive House Democrats have demanded the party oppose the DHS funding bill, ramping up their calls for resistance after anti-ICE activist Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot while attempting to run over an ICE agent in Minneapolis.

Rep. Enrique “Henry” Cuellar (D-TX), a key minority member on the Homeland Security Appropriations subcommittee, has called for his colleagues to support the bill, highlighting several Democrat victories within it. These include $20 million allocated for body cameras for ICE personnel, although the overall ICE budget remains unchanged.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), who helped negotiate the broader spending package, emphasized the urgency of passing the bill to prevent a government shutdown. While acknowledging the bill’s limitations in securing the progressive Democrat demands for substantial ICE reforms, she noted its benefits for other agencies like TSA and FEMA.

DeLauro explained the need to move forward despite the bill’s imperfections, saying, “I signed off. Let’s go. Let’s move. And people will decide what they want to.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Barron Trump Helped Save a Woman’s Life.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Barron Trump helped save a woman’s life after witnessing her being attacked during a FaceTime call.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Barron Trump, a woman who was attacked, and Matvei Rumiantsev, the alleged attacker.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred during a FaceTime call last year, with Barron Trump calling the British police.

💬KEY QUOTE: “He helped save my life. That call was like a sign from God at that moment.” – The woman who testified in court.

🎯IMPACT: The alleged attacker, Matvei Rumiantsev, faces multiple charges, including assault, rape, and intentional strangulation.

IN FULL

A woman told an English court that President Donald J. Trump‘s son Barron Trump “helped save my life” after he contacted police when he realized she was being assaulted, according to testimony heard this week in London. Jurors were told that Barron Trump was in the United States when he received a FaceTime call from the woman, with whom he is friends, and soon realized she was being attacked. Speaking to a police operator, Trump said, “I just got a call from a girl I know. She’s getting beaten up.”

Trump described what he saw on the video call: “I just saw a ceiling and could hear screaming. I could see a guy’s head on the phone, and then the camera turns to her crying and getting hit.” He made the report around 2:20 AM London time in January last year.

The court heard that the alleged attacker, Russian national Matvei Rumiantsev, had earlier become angry after attempting to contact the woman. According to reports, prosecutors said Rumiantsev later went to her home, punched her repeatedly, kicked her in the stomach, and shouted insults at her during the video call with Barron, calling her a “whore” and a “slut.”

During her testimony, the woman praised Barron’s actions. “He helped save my life,” she said. “That call was like a sign from God at that moment.”

Jurors also heard the recording of the emergency call, during which the operator asked Barron how he knew the woman. Trump appeared frustrated by the questioning and urged police to act quickly. He also told operators that it took him several minutes to find the correct phone number for British emergency services from abroad.

Rumiantsev is facing multiple charges, including assault, two counts of rape, intentional strangulation, and perverting the course of justice.

The case comes amid broader concerns about violent crime and public safety in the United Kingdom, particularly in London. Police have particularly struggled to contain violence at large public events, with mass arrests becoming increasingly common, including more than 140 arrests on the opening day of London’s annual Afro-Caribbean Notting Hill Carnival last year.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Gavin Newsom is Bitching About Being Canceled at Davos.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A scheduled appearance by Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA) at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, was canceled, with his team alleging interference from the Trump administration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor Newsom, President Donald J. Trump, the USA House, and the WEF.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The cancellation occurred during the WEF summit in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Under pressure from the White House and State Department, USA House (a church acting as the official US pavilion) is now denying entry to [California Governor] Gavin Newsom to speak with media after Fortune – the official media partner – invited him to speak,” Newsom’s office alleges.

🎯IMPACT: Newsom used the incident to criticize the Trump administration and promote California as a counterbalance to its policies.

IN FULL

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) is complaining that a planned appearance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, was canceled at the last minute after officials at the U.S. pavilion withdrew access, a move his office blamed on pressure from the Trump administration. Newsom had been scheduled to take part in a “fireside chat” organized by Fortune at the USA House, which serves as the official U.S. pavilion at the annual gathering.

Shortly before the event was set to begin, the USA House informed organizers that it could no longer accommodate the liberal governor. In a statement shared publicly by Newsom, his office complained, “Under pressure from the White House and State Department, USA House (a church acting as the official US pavilion) is now denying entry to [California Governor] Gavin Newsom to speak with media after Fortune – the official media partner – invited him to speak.”

Newsom amplified the complaint on social media, whining, “How weak and pathetic do you have to be to be this scared of a fireside chat?”

Fortune confirmed that Newsom had been invited to participate but said the USA House had made the decision to rescind access. The magazine noted that programming at high-profile international events can be affected by logistical, security, and stakeholder considerations.

The incident occurred as Newsom, widely viewed as a potential Democratic presidential contender in 2028, used his Davos visit to attack President Donald J. Trump and international leaders he views as accommodating the Trump administration. Speaking with reporters, Newsom said, “I can’t take this complicity of people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean handing out crowns, the Nobel prizes that are being given away. It’s just pathetic.”

During the forum, Trump announced he had reached what he described as a new framework with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte regarding Greenland, easing tensions with allies and pausing threatened tariffs tied to the dispute over Denmark transferring the territory to the U.S.

A White House spokesman dismissed Newsom’s criticism of the President, saying, “No one in Davos knows who third-rate governor Newscum is or why he is frolicking around Switzerland instead of fixing the many problems he created in California.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Bureaucrats Barrage Farage With Parliamentary Paperwork Probe.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage is being smeared for having breached the code of conduct for Members of Parliament (MPs) in Britain, because he registered some financial interests slightly late.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Daniel Greenberg, and rival political parties.

💬KEY QUOTE: The Commissioner conceded that the late paperwork was “inadvertent because of staffing and other administrative issues” and did not refer Farage for further action.

🎯IMPACT: The corporate media and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government are attempting to frame the paperwork issue as major misconduct, despite the Commissioner concluding no action should be taken against Farage following a protracted investigation.

IN FULL

Nigel Farage, leader of Britain’s Reform Party, breached the code of conduct for Members of Parliament (MPs) by failing to register some financial interests on time. Despite the breaches appearing minor, involving, for instance, payments for television presenting work being registered 36 days late, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s leftist government and the corporate media are attempting to inflate them into an ethics scandal.

Daniel Greenberg, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, conducted the investigation into Farage over three months and determined that the breaches were “inadvertent because of staffing and other administrative issues.” He decided not to refer the matter to the Committee on Standards for further action.

Farage took “full responsibility” for the late paperwork and apologized, saying that “this was an administrative error on behalf of me and my team.”

“Unlike most Members, I have a very complicated and complex set of interests, including my work as a TV presenter and as a successful private businessman, most of which were built long before I was elected as a Member of Parliament,” he explained.

Farage’s party has been consistently topping the polls in Britain for months, with Starmer’s incumbent Labour Party and the formerly governing Conservatives (Tories) both experiencing a historic collapse in support. Consequently, a nascent lawfare campaign is emerging against Farage, similar to that used to exclude French populist leader Marine Le Pen from her country’s forthcoming presidential elections.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Radical Charged With Unhinged Threats to Kill Trump, ICE, and ‘MAGA Republicans.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An Oklahoma man was federally charged with threatening to kill U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, “MAGA Republicans,” and President Donald J. Trump in YouTube comments.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Taylor Ryan Prigmore, 30, federal prosecutors, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments were posted between May 9, 2025, and January 17, 2026; Prigmore was arrested on Monday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Hiding behind a screen will not protect you from severe legal consequences.” – Attorney General Pam Bondi.

🎯IMPACT: Prigmore faces up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines.

IN FULL

Taylor Ryan Prigmore, 30, has been arrested and federally charged after allegedly posting threats to kill U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, “MAGA Republicans,” and President Donald J. Trump on YouTube. According to federal prosecutors, the comments were made between May 9, 2025, and January 17, 2026.

“As attacks on law enforcement rise around the country, this Department of Justice will continue to identify and prosecute violent threats against the brave men and women who keep us safe,” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said, adding, “Hiding behind a screen will not protect you from severe legal consequences.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was alerted by Google regarding the threats, which were posted on the company’s YouTube video platform under the username “Adrian Tepes”. According to the criminal complaint, Prigmore wrote threatening comments such as “C*vil w*r. I can’t wait for the opportunity to k*ll people like you. Tell your friends,” and “Prep for civil w*r. Prep for d*th c*mps. Prep for k*illing f*ederal *g*nts.” He also allegedly posted that President Trump “needs to die to save lives.”

FBI Director Kash Patel emphasized the seriousness of the threats, stating, “If you threaten to harm law enforcement officers, the FBI and our partners will find you and hold you accountable. There will be no free passes for threats against the hard-working men and women who wear the badge and protect our communities.”

Prigmore has been ordered to be held in custody pending trial and faces up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines if convicted.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

House Committee Votes to Hold Clintons in Criminal Contempt.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The House Oversight Committee voted to hold former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary Clinton, in criminal contempt of Congress after they refused multiple attempts to enforce a congressional subpoena to compel their testimony regarding deceased pedophile and financier Jeffrey Epstein.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The House Oversight Committee, Chairman James Comer (R-KY), former President Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and House Democrats.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The vote occurred on Wednesday, January 21, 2026, during a meeting of the House Oversight Committee.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Subpoenas are not mere suggestions. They carry the force of law and require compliance. Former President Clinton and Secretary Clinton were legally required to appear for depositions before this committee. They refused.” — Chairman Comer

🎯IMPACT: With the adoption of the criminal contempt of Congress resolutions, the measure will now move to a vote before the full House of Representatives.

IN FULL

The House Oversight Committee voted to hold former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary Clinton, in criminal contempt of Congress after they refused multiple attempts to enforce a congressional subpoena to compel their testimony as part of the committee’s investigation into deceased pedophile and financier Jeffrey Epstein. While Democrats largely opposed the contempt measure during the debate prior to the vote, ranking members on the committee largely acknowledged that the subpoena was legally valid—contradicting assertions made by attorneys for the Clintons.

“Subpoenas are not mere suggestions. They carry the force of law and require compliance. Former President Clinton and Secretary Clinton were legally required to appear for depositions before this committee. They refused,” Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said on Wednesday.

Earlier this month, both Bill and Hillary Clinton defied a congressional subpoena that compelled their testimony before the House panel. The testimony was slated for January 13 and 14; however, an attorney representing the Clintons stated that neither would appear before the House panel and argued that the congressional subpoena is “legally unenforceable.”

Over the last week, attorneys for the Clintons have attempted to extract unusual concessions from the House Oversight Committee, including a demand that Chairman Comer meet with Bill Clinton at his office in New York instead of on Capitol Hill. The National Pulse reported on Tuesday that attorneys for the Clintons alleged that Chairman Comer was insisting on a hearing format “that would allow members of the committee to harass our clients, and indicated you would proceed with plans to hold our clients in contempt if they did not agree.”

With the adoption of the criminal contempt of Congress resolutions, the measures will now move to a vote before the full House of Representatives. According to Chairman Comer, final votes in the House chamber are expected within the next two weeks.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ART OF THE DEAL: Trump Agrees New Greenland Framework With NATO Chief, Pauses Tariffs.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced he would not impose tariffs on eight European countries, after agreeing on a framework for a new deal covering Greenland and the wider Arctic region.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and other European nations.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced Wednesday, with potential tariffs starting February 1; comments made at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Global markets reacted positively, with stocks soaring; European Union (EU) leaders previously scheduled an emergency summit to address Trump’s demands.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump announced on Wednesday that he would not impose tariffs on eight European countries, which were set to take effect on February 1, over their opposition to the United States taking control of Greenland. The announcement followed a “very productive meeting” with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, where the pair “formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region,” according to Trump.

“This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st,” Trump wrote, adding: “Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland.” He said Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and others would handle the negotiations, reporting directly to the President.

The now-suspended tariffs, initially set at 10 percent, were planned to rise to 25 percent by June if the nations subject to them did not comply with Trump’s demands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, earlier in the day, Trump had reiterated his desire for the United States to control Greenland, but stated that he would not use force to acquire the semi-autonomous Danish territory. Instead, he requested “immediate negotiations” with Denmark.

Denmark’s foreign minister responded, saying, “We will not enter into any negotiations on the basis of giving up fundamental principles.” The European Union (EU) previously scheduled an emergency summit on Thursday to address the situation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘No Doubt’ America Running Greenland Would Be ‘Better for the World’ – Farage.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has said that U.S. ownership of Greenland would be “better for the world” in security terms, but that the Greenlanders should have the deciding say.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, leader of Britain’s Reform Party.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 21, 2026, at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “[W]ould America owning Greenland be better for the world in terms of safety and stronger for NATO? It would.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: Farage backed U.S. ownership of Greenland from a security perspective, but emphasized the importance of respecting Greenlanders’ right to self-determination.

IN FULL

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has backed U.S. ownership of Greenland as a win for international security, but said Greenlanders should have the deciding say in the matter. The longtime ally of President Donald J. Trump said there was “no doubt the world would be a better, more secure place if a strong America was in Greenland” at a World Economic Forum (WEF) event in Davos, Switzerland.

Farage stressed the sensitive “geopolitics of the High North, because of the retreating ice caps, and because of continued expansionism of Russian icebreakers, of Chinese investment,” adding: “So would America owning Greenland be better for the world in terms of safety and stronger for NATO? It would.”

He added, however, that the Greenlanders—a largely Inuit population with a wide degree of autonomy from Denmark—have a right to self-determination, stressing that “if you believe in Brexit and you believe in celebrating in America’s 250th birthday, if you believe in the nation-state and not globalist structures, you believe in sovereignty, and if you believe in sovereignty, you believe in the principle of national self-determination.”

“You must respect the rights and views of the Greenlanders, because that is what national self-determination is,” Farage concluded.

Notably, polls show that a substantial majority of Greenlanders favor independence from Denmark, but an even larger majority are opposed to it if it means losing Danish funding, which covers roughly half the territory’s budget. While Greenland’s government has expressed reluctance about becoming a U.S. territory, it seems likely that the U.S. government could make an offer to the Greenlanders far exceeding the support they currently receive from Copenhagen.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.