❓WHAT HAPPENED: Three major U.S. labor unions have filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging that a surveillance program using artificial intelligence (AI) and social media monitoring to root out extremist noncitizens suppresses lawful dissent.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The United Auto Workers, Communications Workers of America, and American Federation of Teachers, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and others.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on October 16, in the Southern District of New York.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We will continue to revoke the visas of those who put the safety of our citizens at risk.” – Tommy Pigott, State Department spokesman.
🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit challenges the limits of First Amendment protections for resident aliens and could set a precedent on government surveillance.
Three major labor unions filed a federal lawsuit this week, accusing the Trump administration of violating constitutional rights through an AI-powered surveillance program that monitors the online speech of noncitizens for extremism. The United Auto Workers (UAW), Communications Workers of America (CWA), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) filed the complaint in the Southern District of New York on October 16.
The lawsuit targets the Departments of State and Homeland Security, claiming they are operating a surveillance system that flags “disfavored viewpoints” on social media for immigration review. The unions argue that the program is chilling free expression, claiming that noncitizens are self-censoring or avoiding political and union activity to prevent visa issues.
At the center of the case is Executive Order 14161, signed by President Trump on January 20, 2025, directing federal agencies to screen foreign nationals for “hostile attitudes” and expand interagency efforts to identify ideological or cultural threats. The unions allege this order has led to visa revocations based not on credible security concerns, but on what they consider constitutionally protected speech.
“The administration is hunting online for an ever-growing list of disfavored viewpoints,” said Golnaz Fakhimi, legal director of Muslim Advocates, who is supporting the lawsuit. However, the State Department has defended its actions, with spokesman Tommy Pigott vowing, “We will continue to revoke the visas of those who put the safety of our citizens at risk.”
The case, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al. v. United States Department of State et al., could have significant legal ramifications. It is expected to test the extent of First Amendment protections for foreigners and the constitutionality of using digital surveillance in immigration enforcement. A ruling on a preliminary injunction or motion to dismiss could set a major precedent, and legal experts believe the case may reach the Supreme Court.
The administration has so far taken a hard line on immigration, including revoking more than 6,000 student visas in 2025 alone.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.