❓WHAT HAPPENED: Prison employees at the facility where Ghislaine Maxwell is currently incarcerated has reportedly been fired after leaking the Jeffrey Epstein accomplice’s communications to Congressional Democrats, according to her attorneys.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell attorney Leah Saffian, the Trump administration, House Judiciary Democrats, and Federal Bureau of Prisons employees.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The revelations were made late Friday, November 14, after House Judiciary Democrats obtained emails between Maxwell and her attorneys.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There have been appropriate consequences already for employees at Federal Prison Camp Bryan. They have been terminated for improper, unauthori[z]ed access to the email system used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to allow inmates to communicate with the outside world.” — Maxwell’s attorney, Leah Saffian.

🎯IMPACT: House Democrats are characterizing the breach as a whistleblower action, though it is legally dubious whether the leaking of client-attorney communications by a third-party federal employee engaging in unauthorized access would qualify as whistleblowing.

Prison employees at the facility where Ghislaine Maxwell is currently incarcerated have reportedly been fired after leaking the Jeffrey Epstein accomplice’s communications to Congressional Democrats, according to her attorneys. The revelation comes after House Democrats had somehow obtained emails between Maxwell and her legal team regarding a possible commutation of her sentence for her role in Epstein’s sex trafficking of minors.

“Contrary to Rep. Raskin’s (D-MD) assertion, Ms Maxwell has not requested a commutation—or made a Pardon—application to the second Trump Administration,” wrote Maxwell’s attorney, Leah Saffian, in a statement. She continued: “There have been appropriate consequences already for employees at Federal Prison Camp Bryan. They have been terminated for improper, unauthori[z]ed access to the email system used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to allow inmates to communicate with the outside world.”

House Democrats are characterizing the breach as a whistleblower action, though it is legally dubious whether the leaking of client-attorney communications by a third-party federal employee engaging in unauthorized access would qualify as whistleblowing. “To protect the identity of whistleblowers we won’t comment on any information that could identify whistleblowers, including whistleblowers’ employment status. Any effort by BOP to intimidate, silence, or retaliate against anyone, including inmates and staff with information on Ms. Maxwell’s outrageous preferential treatment is unacceptable,” a spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee Democrats said.

“Dressing the improper action up as ‘Whistleblower Information’ does not mitigate the fact that the mails were both illegally obtained and put to unconstitutional purpose,” Saffian contends, characterizing the communications as “privileged client-attorney email” correspondence. She added: “For Rep. Raskin to seek to make political capital from such publication and from the content of personal emails between Ms Maxwell and a family member is both shocking and reprehensible.”

The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has not directly confirmed that it has dismissed any employees over the matter. However, the federal agency did state: “While we cannot comment on specific personnel matters or ongoing investigations, the BOP reaffirms its zero-tolerance stance on misconduct and its unwavering commitment to accountability at every level of the organization.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.