Dozens of Ukrainian soldiers undergoing training in France have reportedly deserted. The desertions come as the Ukrainian military is currently struggling to hold back Russian advances.
The French army admitted that dozens of the 2,300 soldiers undergoing training in the country had deserted but claimed the figure was small in comparison to the number of troops that had been trained. As such, desertion is not considered a crime in France; none of the men who fled the Ukrainian army will face any criminal repercussions while in the country.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
The soldiers all belong to the brigade “Anna of Kiev,” named after the second wife of France’s King Henry I. Ukrainian journalist Yuri Butusov claimed that 50 soldiers deserted in France and that, overall, 1,700 have fled before being sent to the front. Notably, Ukrainian land forces commander Mykhailo Drapatyi was confronted by the reports on January 6. He simply stated that he would not refute them.
Russian forces are currently advancing toward key cities and towns like the logistics hub Pokovsk. According to some estimates, as many as a million soldiers have been killed or seriously wounded in the war since it began in February of 2022.
Former North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said as far back as last May that Ukraine was clearly losing the war on the ground. As a result of heavy losses and desertions, including men fleeing the country, the Ukrainian military has begun kidnapping people from nightclubs and other venues and sending them into combat.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is also being pressured by the outgoing Biden-Harris regime to lower the conscription age to 18 to bolster troop numbers.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Elon Musk’s departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has led to ongoing tensions between Musk and President Donald J. Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance is calling for reconciliation.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Elon Musk, President Donald J. Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The fallout began in May with Musk’s departure from DOGE and has continued through recent months with public statements and interviews.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I really think it’s a mistake for [Musk] to try to break from the President. My hope is that by the time of the midterms, he’s kind of come back into the fold.” – J.D. Vance
🎯IMPACT: The strained relationship between Musk and Trump has implications for midterm election strategies, should the tech mogul follow through on his threats to field America Party candidates at scale.
IN FULL
Vice President J.D. Vance says he hopes that billionaire technology and aerospace mogul Elon Musk will reconcile with President Donald J. Trump ahead of the 2026 congressional midterm elections. While tension between Musk and the Trump White House has remained since the former’s rocky departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in late May—and Musk’s subsequent attacks on Trump’s budget proposal as a “massive, outrageous, pork-filled… disgusting abomination”—the billionaire has recently begun deleting social media posts critical of Trump and donated $15 million to pro-MAGA super PACs.
“I really think it’s a mistake for [Musk] to try to break from the President. My hope is that by the time of the midterms, he’s kind of come back into the fold,” Vice President Vance said during a media interview over the weekend.
During the falling out between Trump and Musk, beginning in May, the President threatened to pull SpaceX‘s government contracts, notably after Musk had threatened to end his company’s relationship with NASA. In addition, President Trump alluded to Musk as having pushed for greater government subsidies and other carveouts for his struggling electric car company, Tesla.
President Trump’s recent comments suggest a softened stance toward Musk. During an Oval Office press conference, Trump said, “I think he’s a good person, and I think he had a bad moment, a really bad moment, but he’s a good person. I believe that.”
Vance also warned Musk that his political future outside of the GOP is limited, saying, “My argument to Elon is, like, you’re not gonna be on the left, even if you wanted to be, and he doesn’t, they’re not gonna have you back. That ship has sailed.”
Musk has been in the initial stages of launching an “America Party” as an alternative to the Republicans and the GOP. However, such a party is unlikely to achieve anything beyond siphoning libertarian-leaning voters from the Republicans and putting the Democrats back in power.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced his plan to address crime and other issues in Washington, D.C.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED:Donald Trump, Washington, D.C. officials, and residents.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on Monday via Truth Social.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN! The days of ruthlessly killing, or hurting, innocent people, are OVER!” – Donald J. Trump
🎯IMPACT: Trump pledges to tackle crime and restore order in the nation’s capital.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump vowed that “Washington, D.C. will be LIBERATED today!” in a Monday morning social media post. “Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN!” he declared on his Truth Social platform.
“The days of ruthlessly killing, or hurting, innocent people, are OVER! I quickly fixed the Border (ZERO ILLEGALS in last 3 months!), D.C. is next!!!” he added. This precedes a press conference planned for 10 AM, at which it is speculated that the America First leader may move to federalize the Democrat-dominated U.S. capital.
In February, Trump posited a federal takeover of D.C., telling reporters, “I think that we should govern the District of Columbia… we should run it strong, run it with law and order, make it absolutely flawlessly beautiful.”
The issue has gained prominence again following a violent assault on former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward Coristine, a.k.a. “Big Balls,” as he attempted to stop a carjacking. President Trump has already moved to bolster law enforcement in D.C. with personnel from federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the U.S. Marshals Service.
In March, Trump signed an Executive Order titled ‘Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful,’ declaring that “As the Federal capital city, Washington, D.C., is the only city that belongs to all Americans and… it should showcase beautiful, clean, and safe public spaces,” and establishing a D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Oasis has been advised to avoid criticizing President Trump as they prepare for their U.S. reunion tour.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Liam and Noel Gallagher of Oasis, and talent manager Jonathan Shalit.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The U.S. leg of their tour begins in Chicago in late August.
💬KEY QUOTE: “My advice to Oasis is simple: Stay out of American politics.” – Jonathan Shalit
🎯IMPACT: The warning aims to prevent potential disruptions during the band’s U.S. tour.
IN FULL
Brit rock band Oasis has been advised to avoid commenting on President Donald Trump as they prepare to kick off the U.S. leg of their reunion tour in Chicago this August. Veteran talent manager Jonathan Shalit, chairman of the InterTalent Rights Group, warned the Gallagher brothers to steer clear of American politics.
“My advice to Oasis is simple: Stay out of American politics,” Shalit told reporters. “If they want their US tour to go ahead without disruption, it would be wise to keep quiet on all things Trump.”
The Gallagher brothers, Liam and Noel, have previously expressed strong opinions about the former president. Speaking to Canada’s CBC, Noel once described Trump as “fucking hilarious” but added, “If it’s a toss-up between Hillary [Clinton] and Trump, American politics is in a worse fucking place than ours.”
Noel’s views shifted after Trump’s 2016 election win. He told Paste magazine he avoids most news but made an exception for Trump, citing concerns about his environmental policies: “His views on the environment are pretty fucking scary, and that will affect my children.”
Liam Gallagher, meanwhile, took a more personal approach during their long-running feud, comparing his brother Noel to Trump. Accepting an award at the NME Awards in London, Liam called Noel “worse than Donald Trump” and “the biggest liar and biggest faker in the business.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: China successfully tested its first manned lunar lander in landing and takeoff.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: China Manned Space Agency and U.S. Transportation Secretary and interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The test took place on Wednesday in Huailai County, Hebei province, northern China.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re in a race to the Moon, in a race with China to the Moon. And to have a base on the Moon, we need energy.” – Sean Duffy
🎯IMPACT: Major breakthroughs for China’s manned lunar exploration program allow China to demonstrate the ability for a crewed spacecraft to land and take off from an extraterrestrial body for the first time.
IN FULL
China is progressing towards its objective of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. The communist country announced a significant milestone in its lunar exploration program, successfully completing the first “comprehensive landing and takeoff test” of its manned lunar lander, Lanyue. The test was conducted at a facility in Huailai County, northern China, and was described as a breakthrough by the China Manned Space Agency.
This event was the first time China tested the “extraterrestrial landing and takeoff capabilities” of a manned spacecraft, a major breakthrough in the research and development of its manned lunar exploration program. The Lanyue is a two-part lunar lander with a landing and propulsion module. It’s designed to transport two astronauts between the Moon’s orbit and surface. The design resembles the Apollo Lunar Module, which featured an ascent rocket engine and a lower stage for descent.
In addition to China’s moon landing mission, the country has constructed a network of 16 space facilities in Latin America while operating Tiangong, a modern space station. China is also advancing another moon mission aimed at building the International Lunar Research Station, a scientific experimental facility located on the Moon’s surface and orbit. The project’s completion is scheduled for 2025 and 2050.
Meanwhile, U.S. Transportation Secretary and interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy announced a plan to construct a nuclear reactor on the Moon on Tuesday, stating, “We’re in a race to the Moon, in a race with China to the Moon. And to have a base on the Moon, we need energy.”
Currently, the United States is the first and only country to land humans on the Moon, with its next planned moon landing mission set for 2027. NASA launched the Apollo program in 1961, which landed the first humans on the Moon in 1969. The program included six lunar missions with twelve astronauts and ended in 1972.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is reportedly planning to take Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public later this year, potentially raising $30 billion.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and market analysts tracking the mortgage giants.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Expected later this year, with details surfacing on Friday, August 8, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This is a highly complicated potential transaction here… I’ve heard more years-long timelines with regards to bringing Fannie and Freddie public here.” – Analysts following the developments.
🎯IMPACT: Shares of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have risen, with Freddie up 3 percent and Fannie up 4.5 percent, amid speculation about the IPO timeline.
IN FULL
Speculation is mounting that the Trump administration is planning to take Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public later this year. The plans could involve selling between 5 percent and 15 percent of their stock, valuing the mortgage giants at approximately $500 billion.
The two companies, which have been under government control since the 2008 financial crisis, might remain under government conservatorship, though this detail remains unclear. Analysts suggest the transaction could raise $30 billion, but questions remain about the feasibility of the timeline.
“This is a highly complicated potential transaction here,” said one analyst, noting that most observers have anticipated a years-long timeline for such a move. The possibility of an IPO later this year has raised skepticism among those who have tracked the government-sponsored enterprises for years.
Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have reacted positively to the news. Freddie Mac’s stock rose 3 percent, while Fannie Mae saw a 4.5 percent increase. The market appears to be pricing in optimism about the potential IPO and the two companies’ future.
Further developments are expected as the Trump administration finalizes its plans. The timeline and structure of the IPO, including whether the companies will go public as one entity or two separate ones, remain key details to watch.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: New polling shows Keir Starmer’s lead over Nigel Farage as the preferred prime minister has significantly narrowed, reflecting a decline in public confidence.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, Jeremy Corbyn, Ed Davey, and other political figures.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The polling data was collected earlier this month, reflecting public sentiment as of August 2025 in the United Kingdom.
🎯IMPACT: The data highlights growing dissatisfaction with Starmer’s leadership and signals potential shifts in voter preferences toward Farage ahead of future elections.
IN FULL
According to the latest polling, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer‘s lead over Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as the preferred prime minister has shrunk. In May, Starmer held a 44 percent to 29 percent advantage over Farage, but this has now fallen to 35 percent to 28 percent in August. The decline reflects a shift in public sentiment, particularly among left-of-center voters.
The polling also reveals that Starmer’s advantage against other political figures, such as Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch and Liberal leader Ed Davey, has narrowed. When compared to Badenoch, Starmer’s lead has dropped from 36 percent to 30 percent, while support for Badenoch has also declined from 25 percent to 20 percent. Meanwhile, Starmer and Davey are now tied at 20 percent each, down from 27 percent to 25 percent in May.
Nigel Farage has also gained ground against other figures. For instance, Farage now leads Kemi Badenoch 23 percent to 21 percent, reversing her previous 29 percent to 25 percent advantage. Similarly, Ed Davey’s lead over Farage has dropped from 14 points in May to just 31 percent to 27 percent in the latest poll.
Public dissatisfaction with Starmer’s premiership is evident, with only 9 percent of Britons rating him as a great or good prime minister. The majority describe his performance as poor or terrible, and even among his own Labour Party voters, only 18 percent view him as above average. Nigel Farage scores the highest among potential leaders, with 24 percent of Britons believing he would be a good prime minister.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: India has reportedly paused arms purchases from the United States and canceled a visit by Defense Minister Rajnath Singh to Washington following new tariffs imposed by President Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and the Indian Defense Ministry.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The tariffs were imposed in August 2025, with the arms purchase developments emerging shortly after, according to Reuters.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is clarified that the various cases of procurement are being progressed as per the extant procedures,” said the Indian Defense Ministry, rejecting Reuters’ report.
🎯IMPACT: The situation could affect U.S.-India defense ties and trade negotiations amidst broader geopolitical shifts.
IN FULL
India has reportedly begun pushing back against the recent wave of tariffs imposed by President Donald J. Trump, with officials indicating that key defense agreements with the United States have been paused. According to three Indian government sources, New Delhi has temporarily shelved plans to acquire American military equipment and has also canceled a scheduled visit to Washington by Defense Minister Rajnath Singh.
These developments follow President Trump’s announcement earlier this month of sweeping trade measures targeting India. The White House introduced a blanket 25 percent tariff on Indian exports, along with a punitive 25 percent levy specifically aimed at Indian purchases of Russian crude oil. The combined 50 percent tariff burden is expected to take effect on August 26. Sources close to the matter suggest that the defense freeze could be lifted if the two nations reach a breakthrough in trade talks before the deadline.
In recent years, India has worked to diversify its defense partnerships, especially since the 2020 border clashes with China prompted a reassessment of its military readiness. While India has traditionally relied on Russian defense hardware, Washington made significant inroads under Trump’s previous term, securing over $24 billion in arms sales. However, this growing defense cooperation now faces uncertainty amid the escalating trade dispute.
Indian defense officials have reportedly halted negotiations on several major arms deals, including the Stryker armored vehicle, the Javelin anti-tank missile system, and the Boeing P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. The Stryker purchase had already encountered headwinds due to India’s ambition to develop local alternatives. Meanwhile, the P-8I deal was reportedly under review due to rising costs and evolving strategic priorities. Notably, Indian media had flagged delays in these procurement programs prior to the newest reports.
In response to the new reports, the Indian Defense Ministry strongly denied any freeze in defense talks, labeling the report as “false and fabricated.” In an official statement, the ministry asserted, “It is clarified that the various cases of procurement are being progressed as per the extant procedures,” and further emphasized that there is “no pause in talks related to buying U.S. arms.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Democratic strategist James Carville issued a public apology after making a false claim about First Lady Melania Trump’s introduction to Donald Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: James Carville, Melania Trump, President Donald J. Trump, and leftist writer Judd Legum.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred during a recent episode of the Politics War Room podcast.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I also take back these statements and apologize.” – James Carville
🎯IMPACT: The video containing the false claims was removed, and Carville’s comments were edited out of the podcast episode.
IN FULL
Democratic strategist James Carville issued a public apology after claiming that First Lady Melania Trump was introduced to her husband, President Donald J. Trump, by convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The comments were made on the Politics War Room podcast during a discussion with leftist writer Judd Legum.
Following a letter from Melania Trump’s legal team, Carville stated, “In last week’s podcast episode, we spoke with Judd Legum. After the episode, we received a letter from Melania Trump’s lawyer. He took issue with our title of one of those YouTube videos from that episode and a couple of comments I made about the First Lady.”
Carville continued, “We took a look at what they complained about, and we took down the video and edited out those comments from the episode. I also take back these statements and apologize.”
The controversy follows a similar incident in late July when The Daily Beast removed an article alleging that a modeling agent connected to Epstein introduced Melania to Donald Trump. The claims, attributed to author Michael Wolff, were later retracted after Melania’s attorneys intervened.
In her 2024 memoir, Melania Trump clarified that she met Donald Trump in September 1998 at a Fashion Week party at the Kit Kat Klub in New York City. She described the moment, writing, “I saw my friend wave at someone behind me. When I turned around, I noticed a man and an attractive blonde woman approaching us. ‘Hi. I’m Donald Trump,’ the man said when he reached my table.”
The long-time Democrat strategist, who worked for former President Bill Clinton, is well-known for blusterous comments. The “ragin’ cajun” had a meltdown last year when young voters refused to show enthusiasm about former President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign. In another instance, he labelled gun control activist David Hogg as a “contemptible little twerp” when Hogg announced plans to try to use Democratic National Committee money to oust Democrats not viewed as progressive and woke enough.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump’s Solicitor General is asking the Supreme Court to override restrictions on ICE operations imposed by judges in Los Angeles and California.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Solicitor General D. John Sauer, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Central District of California, with an appeal filed with the Supreme Court late Thursday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Every day that the district court’s order remains in effect, law-enforcement officers throughout the most populous district in the country are laboring under the threat of judicial contempt.” – D. John Sauer
🎯IMPACT: The case highlights a clash between enforcing federal immigration laws and judicial curbs that critics argue hinder ICE operations.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump’s legal team has taken its case to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to overturn judicial limitations on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities in California. These limitations were put in place by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in the Central District of California and have sparked ongoing conflict between federal immigration officials and the courts.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer criticized the restrictions, claiming they have significantly disrupted federal immigration enforcement in an area that includes approximately two million illegal immigrants. He defended ICE’s discretion and decision-making during operations, remarking, “Needless to say, no one thinks that speaking Spanish or working in construction always creates reasonable suspicion.”
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Judge Frimpong’s ruling, agreeing that characteristics such as language, ethnicity, occupation, or race do not amount to reasonable grounds for initiating stops. According to the court, these elements form a generalized profile rather than pointing to particular unlawful behavior.
Sauer cautioned that the order continues to hamper law enforcement efforts in the most densely populated federal district in the nation, stating, “Every day that the district court’s order remains in effect, law-enforcement officers throughout the most populous district in the country are laboring under the threat of judicial contempt.” He further argued that such legal constraints hinder agents’ ability to fulfill their duties under federal law.
Supporters of the court-imposed limits, including Democratic lawmakers and some business sectors, argue that these measures benefit the economy by enabling access to lower-cost immigrant labor, rather than pushing companies toward higher wages or automation. In contrast, the Trump administration has maintained its commitment to fostering a high-wage, high-tech economy and opposing a system that relies on mass migration and lower wages.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Poland’s new conservative President Karol Nawrocki assumed office this week, using his inaugural speech to rail against illegal immigration and his opposition to Poland joining the euro.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Polish President Karol Nawrocki, European Union (EU).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: President Nawrocki made his comments after assuming office on August 6.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Traditional values and legitimate authority prevail when citizens defend their identity and future.” — Karol Nawrocki.
🎯IMPACT: The election marks a shift back to the conservative right in Poland, which split over the Ukraine conflict and lost the last national elections in 2023.
IN FULL
Conservative Karol Nawrocki was officially sworn in as President of Poland on August 6. In his inaugural address, he stressed his administration’s focus on national sovereignty, security, and the defense of traditional values.
At the center of his speech were firm positions on illegal immigration and monetary policy. Nawrocki reaffirmed his opposition to illegal immigration and to Poland joining the eurozone, stating that these stances are aligned with principles that “prioritize social stability and order.”
Nawrocki, a historian and former head of the Institute of National Remembrance, won the presidency with 50.89 percent of the vote in the second round of elections held on June 1, 2025. His candidacy was backed by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, the former governing party of Poland prior to the 2023 national elections.
His inauguration marks a significant political shift in Poland. Nawrocki has presented his victory as a rejection of policies emanating from Brussels, calling out what he described as the “impositions of European bureaucracy” and defending what he views as Poland’s cultural and political autonomy.
According to official statements from his campaign, the election outcome is interpreted as a “strong message against globalist policies that threaten the traditional social fabric.”
In his address, Nawrocki pledged to implement several domestic reforms, including reducing the value-added tax (VAT) from 23 percent to 22 percent and instituting tax exemptions for families with two or more children. He described these initiatives as a means of reinforcing “the family as a fundamental pillar of society.”
On economic policy, Nawrocki signaled opposition to “excessive regulation of cryptocurrencies” and committed to addressing “unfair competition” within the Polish economy. His campaign has framed these efforts as part of a broader “pragmatic and patriotic approach.”
The new president’s remarks also conveyed a message to the European Union, asserting that “sovereign peoples will not yield to agendas that undermine their traditions and security.” His administration is expected to take a more confrontational stance toward EU institutions than his predecessor.
Supporters argue that the election result reaffirms Poland’s commitment to conservative principles and national self-determination. “Traditional values and legitimate authority prevail when citizens defend their identity and future,” Nawrocki said in closing.
Meanwhile, political analysts say the result represents a significant setback for Poland’s left-leaning and pro-European parties, which Nawrocki’s allies have accused of promoting a “globalist agenda and disdain for traditions.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
