GET THE APP
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

January 22, 2025
Media
News

Prince Harry’s Court Case Against Murdoch’s News Group Begins.

The legal proceedings involving Prince Harry and Rupert Murdoch’s Sun tabloid commenced Tuesday with delays. These were caused by adjournments sought by the prince’s lawyers, resulting in a slow start to the trial. The court’s presiding judge, Timothy Fancourt, expressed dissatisfaction with the interruptions but granted them.

Prince Harry’s lawsuit against News Group Newspapers (NGN), which owns The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, concerns allegations of illegal information gathering. The prince contends that these methods were employed for stories dating back to 1996. According to Harry, he only became aware of these practices in 2006.

The trial will focus on 30 articles published by NGN outlets, which Prince Harry claims were sourced through unlawful means under British law. Former British politician Tom Watson is also involved as a claimant and was present in court on Tuesday.

In a related case in 2023, Prince Harry and other litigants secured more than $170,000 in damages from Mirror Group Newspapers over similar accusations. During that trial, Prince Harry became the first senior British royal in over a century to provide testimony in court.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
Economy
News

BREAKING: Fed Defies Trump, Hikes Interest Rates for First Time in Three Years.

The Federal Reserve has increased interest rates to combat persistent inflation, amid geopolitical issues and rising energy prices caused by the Iran and Ukraine wars.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Reserve has raised its benchmark interest rate to a range of 3.75 percent to four percent, marking the first increase since July 2023. This decision was made unanimously by the central bank to address persistent inflation concerns.
📰 DETAIL: The Fed’s decision comes amid rising tensions in the Middle East, with Iran largely closing down the Strait of Hormuz following clashes with the U.S. and Israel and the Iran-backed Houthis disrupting oil exports from Saudi Arabia more broadly. The regional conflict has driven oil prices higher, contributing to inflationary pressures. Mutual, escalating strikes on energy infrastructure by Ukraine and Russia, particularly diesel-producing refineries in Russia, are likely to exacerbate this instability. The U.S. central bank anticipates one more rate hike this year, with officials divided on how many more are needed. Inflation is projected to rise to 3.7 percent on a headline basis, with core inflation at 3.4 percent.
🎯 IMPACT: The rate hike is intended to stabilize prices and support the Fed’s two percent inflation goal, though officials do not expect to reach this target until after 2028. The decision comes ahead of the November midterm elections, with President Donald J. Trump, who has consistently pushed for lower interest rates, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent likely to object to the timing and question the necessity of the rate increase.

This story is developing…

Image by Rafael Saldana.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Federal Reserve has increased interest rates to combat persistent inflation, amid geopolitical issues and rising energy prices caused by the Iran and Ukraine wars.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Crime
News

Suspected Lockerbie Bomber to Stand Trial 38 Years After Pan Am Attack Killed 270.

The trial of Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi, accused of building the bomb responsible for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing, is set to begin in January, following decades of investigation and legal delays.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The alleged Lockerbie bomber will finally face trial nearly four decades after the attack that killed 270 people, with prosecutors telling a U.S. court that Americans were the intended targets. During a preliminary hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Brittany Keil said the plot was designed to “inflict pain and horror that would be reported around the world.”
📺 DETAIL: Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi, now in his mid-seventies, has pleaded not guilty to two charges of destroying an aircraft resulting in death, offenses carrying a potential life sentence. Prosecutors and defense attorneys told Judge Dabney Friedrich they would be ready to begin proceedings in January, with the trial expected to last about two months and jury selection potentially beginning January 19. Friedrich warned that she would not tolerate further delays after the trial was postponed three times, most recently when jury selection scheduled for August 26 was halted following the discovery of new evidence. The defense said the new material would add about a week to its case and require testimony from four additional expert witnesses, while prosecutors allege Al-Marimi previously admitted involvement in the bombing, a claim his lawyers dispute. Al-Marimi was extradited from Libya to the United States in 2022 and is accused of building the bomb that destroyed Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
🎯 IMPACT: The long-delayed trial could provide new evidence and testimony about who was responsible for the Lockerbie bombing and the broader Libyan role in the attack. A conviction could also mark a significant development in the decades-long effort to establish accountability for the 270 deaths, while potentially shedding further light on disputed aspects of the case.
📺 FLASHBACK: The bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 occurred on December 21, 1988, when the Boeing 747 exploded at 31,000 feet, just 38 minutes after leaving London Heathrow for New York. All 259 crew and passengers, the youngest just two months old, were killed, along with eleven people, three of them children as young as ten, in the Scottish town of Lockerbie, after the aircraft’s main wing box structure, loaded with roughly 200,000 pounds of aviation fuel, smashed into houses on the ground and exploded. Only one individual, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, was previously convicted for the attack in 2001, though he was released by the Scottish Government on so-called compassionate grounds in 2009, on the understanding that he was on the verge of death. He was welcomed back to Libya as a national hero and lived for several years, dying in 2012 following a civil war.

Image via Air Accident Investigation Branch.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The trial of Abu Agila Mohammad Mas'ud Kheir Al-Marimi, accused of building the bomb responsible for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing, is set to begin in January, following decades of investigation and legal delays.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
News
Politics
UK

Farage’s Reform Party Batters Establishment ‘Conservatives’ in Special Election.

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has secured a significant local election victory over the Conservative Party.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has won a local by-election (special election) in Reform Shadow Chancellor Robert Jenrick’s constituency (electoral district).
📺 DETAIL: On Wednesday, it was announced that Reform candidate Matthew Evans had won the East Markham ward (city council district) by-election. The ward is located in Newark constituency in Nottinghamshire, in England’s East Midlands region. The constituency is represented by Reform’s Robert Jenrick in the House of Commons. Reform secured 49.6 percent of the vote, while support for Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch’s nominally Conservative Party plummeted by 37.6 percent to 28.4 percent. The governing Labour Party came in third with 17.2 percent, a decline of 4.1 percent, while the far-left Green Party only won 4.8 percent. This was Reform’s first time contesting the seat. “An incredible 44% swing from Tory to Reform in Newark! So proud of our candidate, Matthew Evans and my hardworking team. Deeply honoured that my Newark constituents are backing Reform,” posted Jenrick on X (formerly Twitter).
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Excellent win in [Robert Jenrick’s] seat last night. While the Tories plummeted to 28.4%, Reform gained almost 50% on our first time standing there. The Conservative Party is dead.” — Nigel Farage
🎯 IMPACT: This constitutes another blow to the Conservative Party’s electoral prospects and another gain for Reform. Evans will serve as a councillor on Bassetlaw District Council. The result is likely to be viewed as an endorsement of Jenrick, who was originally elected as a member of the Conservative Party but defected to Reform earlier this year.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this year, Reform stormed to victory over the governing Labour Party in the country’s local elections, resulting in the resignation of former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the installation of current Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Nigel Farage's Reform UK has secured a significant local election victory over the Conservative Party.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
News
Politics
UK

Farage Threatens to Sever Union Funding Lifeline for Britain’s Governing Labour Party.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has pushed back against Labour’s proposal to retroactively ban donations to his party, warning of potential reforms targeting the Labour Party’s financial backing from the trade unions.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage has threatened to cut off the governing Labour Party’s funding lifeline from the country’s trade unions.
📺 DETAIL: Following back-to-back £36 million (~$48 million) donations to Reform from British cryptocurrency entrepreneurs Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne, the Labour government announced plans to restrict donations to political parties. Among other measures, the British government has floated retroactively banning the donations from Delo and Harborne to Reform. In response, Farage highlighted Labour’s reliance on donations from trade unions, which have totaled over £53 million ($72 million) since 2010. The Reform leader also accused the Labour Party of using “old communist state” tactics as well as rewarding its donors with favorable legislation and government contracts. Farage warned that if Labour retroactively bans the combined £72 million (~$97 million) contribution from Delo and Harborne, a Reform-led government will introduce legislation to ban trade union donations to political parties. The Reform leader clarified that neither Delo nor Harborne would be given positions in the House of Lords, the upper house of Britain’s legislature, which is populated by political appointees. “Neither Ben Delo nor Christopher Harborne will be getting membership of the House of Lords. It isn’t happening. We’re not for sale,” Farage declared.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “If anybody is giving money to do political bidding, it’s the trade unions,” said Farage in a recent video posted on X (formerly Twitter).
🎯 IMPACT: If Labour succeeds in retroactively banning the donations, it could set a controversial precedent for rewriting laws to target political opponents. If Reform is elected and manages to pass legislation to ban donations from trade unions, the Labour Party would be cut off from its primary source of funding, radically altering the political landscape.
📺 FLASHBACK: Delo and Harborne announced their donations earlier this month. Both men argued that the large donations are necessary to help Reform overcome the inbuilt advantages afforded to the two main establishment parties, namely Labour and the Conservatives (Tories). This follows government legislation limiting donations from British expatriates to £100,000 (~$135,000), a move widely seen as targeting Delo and Harborne, who were based in Hong Kong and Thailand, respectively, but have since relocated to Britain.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has pushed back against Labour's proposal to retroactively ban donations to his party, warning of potential reforms targeting the Labour Party's financial backing from the trade unions.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Economy
News
War

Saudis Halt Oil Shipments to Europe Following Houthi Attacks.

Houthi drone strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure disrupt global energy supplies, prompting international concern and potential military responses.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Saudi Arabia has been forced to suspend some oil shipments to Europe after drone attacks damaged its key East-West oil pipeline, which had provided a crucial alternative to the heavily disrupted Strait of Hormuz. Iraqi terrorists are suspected of carrying out the attack, while Iran-backed Houthi forces have continued targeting shipping in the Red Sea, disrupting a major route for global oil and commodity trade.
📺 DETAIL: Saudi officials told European customers Tuesday that some oil loadings at the Red Sea port of Yanbu had been suspended and that some September deliveries had been canceled. The kingdom has reportedly turned to British Prime Minister Andy Burnham for assistance in countering the Houthis and protecting its energy infrastructure, with the British government agreeing to send military advisers while considering further action. Burnham is expected to discuss the escalating conflict and its economic consequences with President Donald J. Trump when the two leaders meet next week, after Trump reportedly declined Saudi requests for military strikes against the Houthis. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright sought to reassure markets by saying crude would resume flowing through the pipeline within days, while Saudi Arabia is expected to increase the use of so-called dark shipments to maintain exports. The conflict has also intensified inside Saudi Arabia, with Jeddah Airport closed on Tuesday and Saudi authorities reporting that air defenses intercepted a Houthi drone approaching prohibited airspace over Mecca.
🎯 IMPACT: The attacks threaten to further disrupt global oil supplies by damaging a major Saudi export route that provides an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz, potentially adding upward pressure to crude prices and energy costs worldwide. Continued Houthi attacks on Saudi infrastructure and Red Sea shipping could also deepen regional instability and increase risks to global trade and energy security.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Houthi drone strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure disrupt global energy supplies, prompting international concern and potential military responses.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
News
Politics

Top ‘Conservative’ Downplays Grooming Gangs: Not a ‘Real Problem.’

Former Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Rory Stewart called the grooming gangs scandal in Britain a “manageable problem” in a recent podcast appearance, sparking criticism of downplaying the issue and being out of touch.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Rory Stewart, a former Conservative (Tory) Party government minister and leadership contender, claimed that Britain’s grooming gangs scandal is not one of the “real problems” facing the country.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Were there horrible abuse and grooming gangs? Absolutely. Are there families living in Birmingham who I think are facing bad issues for their own families and society? Yes. Do I think that this is a big problem for Britain? No. This is a manageable problem. Including some very unpleasant things where the police did not act correctly, people behaved in an evil fashion, and they need to be prosecuted. But what are the real problems facing Britain? Not this.” – Rory Stewart
📺 DETAIL: Speaking on The Spectator‘s “Quite Right!” podcast to Michael Gove, another former senior Tory politician and leadership contender, Stewart downplayed the issue, characterizing it as a minor side issue. Stewart stood in the Conservative Party leadership race back in 2019 in a bid to obstruct Brexit, Britain’s democratic decision to leave the European Union (EU). After failing to win the leadership, Stewart resigned from Parliament that same year. In 2022, Stewart began co-hosting The Rest is Politics podcast with Alastair Campbell, the former Director of Communications for former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair, linked closely to the Iraq War. “I wouldn’t have expected much else from him, to be honest. He is an elite man, he lives in an elite world. His political views are extremely liberal around his experiences. So, looking at this as a wider issue, he would say, ‘Well, it’s a few people, it’s specific areas, what has that got to do with the national story?’ And obviously and unfortunately, we are ruled by people like that,” commented academic Lisa McKenzie on Stewart’s grooming gangs remarks.
🎯 IMPACT: Stewart’s remarks are likely to reinforce perceptions that the grooming gangs scandal was allowed to happen because members of Britain’s political establishment, from both the ruling Labour Party and the formerly governing Conservatives, did not regard it as a legitimate problem, with some even characterizing it as a conspiracy theory. Notably, Stewart’s The Rest is Politics co-host Alastair Campbell previously circulated false claims about Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk supporting stoning homosexuals shortly after his assassination in September last year.

Image via No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Former Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Rory Stewart called the grooming gangs scandal in Britain a "manageable problem" in a recent podcast appearance, sparking criticism of downplaying the issue and being out of touch.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
News
War

Trump Admin Plans $2.8 Billion in Taxpayer-Subsidized Arms Sales to Israel.

The Trump administration is moving forward with a $2.8 billion arms deal to Israel, reigniting debates over U.S. military aid amid ongoing tensions in Gaza.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is preparing a $2.8 billion arms package for Israel that would include 40,000 2,000-pound bombs, weapons that the Biden government temporarily withheld in 2024 over concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza. The proposed deal reportedly includes 20,000 Mk84 bombs and 20,000 BLU-117s, though the package has not yet been finalized.
📺 DETAIL: Congress has been informally notified of the proposed sale, which would largely be funded through U.S. foreign military financing. This allows Israel to use American taxpayer funds to purchase U.S.-made weapons. The potential sale follows several other moves by the Trump administration to expand Israel’s military capabilities, including a nearly $3 billion weapons package approved last year and additional sales worth $6.67 billion approved in January. The 2,000-pound bombs have different variants, including weapons designed to penetrate underground targets and others capable of causing extensive damage above ground. The U.S.-made bombs have previously been used against Hamas tunnel networks in Gaza. The proposal comes as Israel continues to face international pressure over its military campaign following the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, terror raids against Israel that killed approximately 1,200 people and resulted in 251 hostages being taken. Although a fragile ceasefire has reduced the intensity of fighting, Israeli strikes and attacks by militants have continued, with Israel saying its operations respond to violations of the agreement. Gaza’s Hamas-aligned Health Ministry claims more than 73,264 Palestinians have been killed since the conflict began, including deaths reported after the ceasefire.
🎯 IMPACT: The proposed $2.8 billion weapons package would further strengthen Israel’s military capabilities while signaling continued U.S. support for its defense despite international pressure over the Gaza conflict.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration is moving forward with a $2.8 billion arms deal to Israel, reigniting debates over U.S. military aid amid ongoing tensions in Gaza.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
Immigration
News
UK

British Village Votes for Secession Over Government Plan to Flood It With Migrants.

The village of Piddington in Oxfordshire, England, has voted overwhelmingly for independence for the second time, reflecting ongoing opposition to the British government’s plans to house over 1,200 asylum seekers in the area.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Piddington, a village in Oxfordshire, England, has voted for the second time to secede from the United Kingdom in protest of plans to house over 1,200 asylum seekers in a nearby military base.
📺 DETAIL: The results were announced on Wednesday, with residents showing overwhelming support for independence. The protest was organized by Piddington Parish Council. The village, which has a population of roughly 350 people, first decided to vote for independence on July 4, the 250th anniversary of American independence. In the first vote, 96 percent of residents voted to leave the United Kingdom. The referendum is a protest against the Labour government’s plans to house 1,256 male asylum seekers at a local disused military site. Residents have criticized the government’s plans, citing issues such as inadequate infrastructure and safety risks. This follows reports that the asylum seekers, who will be free to leave the base and roam among the public, would be given taxpayer-funded shuttle buses to help them travel around. “If you added 1,256 males of any demographic to the end of our village, the risk to women would rise, simply because of the arithmetic,” warned Piddington resident Alice West earlier this week.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It means everything our grandparents, our parents fought for – today is the Battle of Britain. This isn’t just about Piddington, this is about our whole country. This Government is destabilising our country. Wherever they put these people, in camps, in HMOs [houses in multiple occupation], or whatever, they’re ruining people’s lives.” – Herbert Owen, Piddington resident.
🎯 IMPACT: The symbolic vote and the margin of victory demonstrate the overwhelming and ongoing opposition to the government’s plans to house asylum seekers in the community. Notably, the area voted for the Liberal Democrats, a progressive liberal party that supports open borders, in recent elections, meaning that residents could swing sharply towards Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which has vowed to use the Royal Navy to stop small boats carrying illegal migrants across the English Channel.
📺 FLASHBACK: According to documents released earlier this month, the government originally planned to house approximately 3,500 asylum seekers in Piddington.

Image by Chris Brown.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The village of Piddington in Oxfordshire, England, has voted overwhelmingly for independence for the second time, reflecting ongoing opposition to the British government's plans to house over 1,200 asylum seekers in the area.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

7 hours ago
News

Kirk Family Plans to Sue ‘Reckless’ Utah Valley University Over ‘Stunning Failures’ in Security.

The family of Charlie Kirk alleges that Utah Valley University’s security lapses led to his assassination during a campus event.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The family of Charlie Kirk has filed a notice of claim against Utah Valley University, alleging that a “series of stunning failures and reckless decisions” led to the Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder’s assassination during an event on campus in September 2025.
📰 DETAIL: The notice states that the university failed to conduct a proper risk assessment and did not allocate sufficient security resources, despite known risks of political violence. It also alleges that the university ignored warnings about rooftop access, which the shooter used to target Kirk.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Charlie Kirk was violently and publicly assassinated while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University (UVU). His murder was entirely preventable and, in fact, would not have happened had the State of Utah and UVU followed through on their stated security promises, which included protecting the rooftops surrounding the quad where Charlie was speaking. Those failures not only robbed Charlie Kirk of his life, but also robbed his family of their husband, father, son, and brother, with impacts that will compound for the rest of their lives. Justice and accountability under the law are key tenets of the American judicial system. This claim preserves the right of Charlie Kirk’s family to pursue accountability for Charlie’s death,” said Brett Parkinson, counsel for the Kirk family.
🎯 IMPACT: The lawsuit could lead to significant legal and financial repercussions for Utah Valley University, and may prompt changes in security protocols for events featuring high-profile figures.
👀 FLASHBACK: The shooting occurred amid a long spate of leftist political violence, including an attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, which left the America First leader and two others wounded, and supporter Corey Comperatore dead, and a sniper ambush targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail

show less

The family of Charlie Kirk alleges that Utah Valley University's security lapses led to his assassination during a campus event.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 hours ago
Data
News
TECH

Data Reveals Growing Fear Among Americans of Losing Jobs to Technology.

A new poll has revealed growing concerns among American workers about job displacement due to advancing technology, particularly among younger workers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A growing number of workers in the United States are worried that technology will take their jobs, according to a new poll.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new Gallup poll, 27 percent of U.S. workers are concerned about losing their jobs to new technology. This constitutes the highest share on record. The poll showed that U.S. workers aged between 18 and 44 are particularly worried, with 34 percent of respondents citing technology-driven job loss as their top employment-related concern. This applies to both graduate and non-graduate workers. Despite these fears, worries over other job-related issues, such as lower wages, shorter hours, benefit reductions, and layoffs, have remained relatively stable compared to previous years. By contrast, less than 20 percent of U.S. workers over the age of 45 are worried about technology-driven job loss, although this still represents an increase compared with recent years. The poll surveyed 1,200 U.S. adults between August 3 and August 24, 2026.
🎯 IMPACT: These anxieties reflect emerging trends in the job market. Earlier this month, a new report by the Burning Glass Institute, a data research firm, revealed that “[M]ore Americans have college degrees than ever, just as artificial intelligence is doing more of the entry-level work companies typically hire young graduates for.” The same report showed that unemployment among non-graduates in the U.S. has hit its lowest rate in recent history. The fact that younger workers are especially worried suggests that opposition to automation will feature prominently in the priorities of young voters. Automation represents one of several job threats to American workers along with offshoring and mass immigration, both of which the Trump administration has sought to reverse. While there have been proposals to regulate Artificial Intelligence to guard against job losses, no exact framework has yet to be established and implemented. These findings are likely to heighten concern about technology-driven job loss and inform legislative priorities, especially as the country approaches the midterm elections.

Image by Adam Fagen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed growing concerns among American workers about job displacement due to advancing technology, particularly among younger workers.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad