Tuesday, November 18, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The British Govt is FINALLY Proposing Asylum Reforms. Here’s Their Plan…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, supposedly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Labour Party, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Reform Party leader Nigel Farage, and asylum seekers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.” — Keir Starmer

🎯IMPACT: While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics suggest that the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for migrants to claim asylum could see the number of migrants overall remain the same or even rise, even if arrivals by sea and other clandestine means decrease. 

IN FULL

The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, ostensibly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain. The changes were unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend, with Starmer stating: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.”

Labour’s leadership is billing the changes as the most comprehensive and sweeping in the history of modern Britain. Asylum seekers, under the new policies, will face a quadrupled length of time before they can receive permanent settlement in the United Kingdom. Additionally, refugee status will now only be temporary.

According to Starmer and Mahmood, the current system allows so-called refugees to abuse Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to essentially delay indefinitely their removal from the United Kingdom. The Labour government is seeking to enact new laws that clarify the meaning of a “family connection” which will legally limit the term to only a direct family member, such as a parent or child. In addition, the United Kingdom is seeking a multi-country review of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ definition of torture, arguing it is too expansive and is being used to claim asylum status where it truly isn’t applicable.

While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics note that they include the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for asylum seekers, and could result in the number of migrants overall remaining the same or even rising, even if the number of illegal boat migrants falls.

Election polls consistently show Brexit-leader Nigel Farage‘s Reform Party outpacing Labour for a majority in Parliament, putting Farage himself on pace to be the United Kingdom’s next prime minister.

Notably, Farage’s popularity has soared in most part because of his outspoken stance on immigration and the need for drastic changes to the United Kingdom’s asylum laws. The data also backs Farage, with immigration and asylum reform consistently being the top issues for Britons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

AI Fears Drive Pullback in Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq Futures.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. stock futures dropped on Tuesday amid concerns over an artificial intelligence (AI) bubble, with Nvidia earnings and delayed jobs data in focus.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Dow Jones, Nasdaq, S&P 500, Nvidia, Bitcoin, and major retailers like Home Depot, Walmart, and Target.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday, across U.S. and Asian financial markets.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Bitcoin’s extended selloff has definitely amplified the market’s risk alarm, reinforcing the sense that something deeper may be shifting under the surface.” – Hebe Chen, Vantage Markets Analyst

🎯IMPACT: Stock market losses, a Bitcoin slump, and shifts in investor sentiment ahead of critical economic data and earnings reports.

IN FULL

American markets were roiled on Tuesday as stock futures plunged over fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) bubble and a continued slide in the value of Bitcoin. Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.7 percent, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 slid 0.8 percent, and the S&P 500 fell 0.6 percent. The falling futures marks the worst three-day run for the Dow since April.

Bitcoin also experienced a sharp decline, briefly falling below $90,000 for the first time in seven months. The cryptocurrency‘s slump erased all its gains for the year and triggered alarm in Asian markets, where Japanese stocks logged their worst loss since April. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell more than two percent, with nearly all regional markets in the red.

Investors are closely watching Nvidia‘s upcoming earnings report on Wednesday, as it could provide insight into the sustainability of this year’s AI-driven market rally. Additionally, the delayed September jobs report, set to release on Thursday, is expected to shape expectations for the Federal Reserve’s next moves and whether an additional rate cut could be enacted at the central bank’s December Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting.

Retailers are also in focus, with Home Depot cutting its full-year profit guidance after missing earnings estimates, causing its shares to drop nearly four percent. Results from Walmart and Target are expected later this week, providing further insights into consumer strength ahead of the holiday season. Notably, a substantial decline in consumption—signaling a demand collapse—could be a key indicator of a deflationary cycle and an economic recession.

Meanwhile, analyst Hebe Chen from Vantage Markets commented on Bitcoin’s selloff, stating, “Bitcoin’s extended selloff has definitely amplified the market’s risk alarm, reinforcing the sense that something deeper may be shifting under the surface.” The cryptocurrency’s decline contributed to pressure on risk-sensitive assets and currencies, while haven assets like the yen and Swiss franc strengthened.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Major Internet Outage, Here’s What We Know…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Cloudflare, a major Internet infrastructure company, experienced a significant outage affecting various websites and services worldwide.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Cloudflare, its customers such as X (formerly Twitter), OpenAI, bet365, and League of Legends, and impacted users globally.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The outage began on the morning of November 18, 2025, and affected websites and services worldwide.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are seeing services recover, but customers may continue to observe higher-than-normal error rates as we continue remediation efforts,” said Cloudflare in a status update.

🎯IMPACT: Major websites, including X (formerly Twitter), OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and betting site bet365, experienced disruptions, leaving users unable to access services.

IN FULL

Cloudflare, a company that supports much of the Internet’s infrastructure, experienced a major outage on Tuesday morning, causing disruptions to many websites and services globally. As of the time of publication, the company has not provided precise details on the disruption’s cause or a timeline for resolution.

Prominent websites such as X (formerly Twitter), OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and betting platform bet365 were among those affected. Users attempting to access these services encountered error messages, including warnings about potential security threats. Cloudflare attributed these messages to its systems’ malfunctioning rather than any actual security issues.

In a status update, Cloudflare stated, “We are seeing services recover, but customers may continue to observe higher-than-normal error rates as we continue remediation efforts.” Despite these assurances, many users reported ongoing problems with accessing affected websites.

Cloudflare’s tools, such as Access and WARP, were reportedly fixed earlier in the day, but the company acknowledged that other services were still being restored. The outage highlighted the company’s critical role in maintaining Internet functionality, as its systems are typically invisible to end-users.

Tracking website Down Detector continued to show issues with a variety of services, though it appeared that Cloudflare was making progress in mitigating the outage. The full impact of the disruption remains unclear, but it underscores the vulnerabilities inherent in centralized Internet infrastructure.

This story is developing…

Image by HaeB.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Orban: Risking ‘World War III’ to Support Ukraine When It Has ‘No Chance’ to Win Is ‘Crazy.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán stated that Ukraine has “no chance” of defeating Russia and called Europe’s financial support for the Ukrainian war effort “crazy,” warning of the risk of escalation toward “World War Three.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Viktor Orbán, other European Union (EU) leaders, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and U.S. officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made during an interview with Mathias Döpfner, CEO of Axel Springer, published on November 17, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We have burned already €185 billion, and… our intention is to burn even more. So we finance a country which has no chance to win the war.” – Viktor Orbán

🎯IMPACT: Orbán’s remarks highlight divisions within the EU over continuing financial and military support for Ukraine, as well as concerns about escalating global tensions.

IN FULL

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has asserted that Ukraine has “no chance” of defeating Russia, denouncing Europe’s financial support for Kiev, given the circumstances, as “just crazy” and cautioning that continued escalation only risks triggering “World War Three.” Speaking in an interview with Mathias Döpfner, CEO of the German media group Axel Springer, Orbán said the European Union (EU) is undermining its own economic stability by pouring billions into the conflict. “We have burned already €185 billion, and… our intention is to burn even more. So we finance a country which has no chance to win the war,” he said.

Orbán argued that some European leaders are supporting the continuation of the conflict in hopes of strengthening their negotiating position in future peace talks, a strategy he condemned as “totally wrong.” He predicted that any meaningful peace agreement will ultimately be negotiated between the United States and Russia, covering not only the war itself but broader issues such as global trade and energy. He said Europe should open its own communication line with Moscow, insisting, “Let the Americans negotiate with the Russians, and then the Europeans should also negotiate with the Russians, and then see whether we can unify the position of the Americans and Europeans.”

He dismissed claims that Russia might attack other European or NATO countries, calling such concerns “ridiculous” and asserting that “they are not strong enough. We are far stronger.”

Looking ahead, Orbán said he expects Russia to retain control over parts of eastern Ukraine, including Donetsk, unless “a miracle” occurs, and advocated for a postwar settlement that stabilizes borders and establishes a demilitarized zone to ensure long-term security. He warned that the nuclear threat increases if a nuclear-armed state, like Russia, faces defeat in a conventional war, saying, “I’m absolutely sure the nuclear risk is on the table immediately.”

Orbán’s comments come at a moment of political and military strain for Ukraine. The country has been shaken by a major corruption scandal involving roughly $100 million in the energy sector, prompting resignations among senior officials and the flight of Timur Mindich, a close ally of President Volodymyr Zelensky, amid police raids. Militarily, Russian forces have advanced in eastern Ukraine and have almost entirely occupied the strategic city of Pokrovsk, raising fears of a significant Ukrainian setback, with Ukrainian troops reportedly being encircled in neighboring Myrnohrad.

Relations between Hungary and Ukraine have also deteriorated. Ukrainian authorities recently claimed to have uncovered a Hungarian intelligence operation in the Zakarpattia (Transcarpathia) region, which led to diplomatic expulsions on both sides and the suspension of talks on minority rights. Notably, Transcarpathia borders Hungary and is home to a large Hungarian minority, which Ukrainian governments have often mistreated, causing friction with Orban’s government.

Orbán has been one of the European Union’s strongest skeptics of Ukraine’s EU accession bid, arguing that membership would bring only bring economic burdens and security risks to Hungary.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Tourist Tax’ Set to Make Visiting Khan’s London Even More Expensive.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A “tourist tax” is set to be introduced in London, England, allowing the mayor to impose a levy on overnight stays in hotels and short-term accommodations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Chancellor (Treasury Secretary) Rachel Reeves, Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, UKHospitality, and other business groups.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The powers could be introduced through the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill currently before Parliament; Chancellor Reeves is expected to announce this in her Budget on November 26.

💬KEY QUOTE: “[M]any of us visit [European Union cities] and don’t really mind paying the extra few euros, in relation to a tourism levy.” – Mayor Khan on other cities that have implemented tourist taxes.

🎯IMPACT: The proposed levy could raise £250 million (~$342m) annually, but industry groups warn it could drive up prices, potentially impacting tourism and local businesses.

IN FULL

London, England, is preparing for a major policy change, as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Chancellor of the Exchequer (Treasury Secretary) Rachel Reeves is expected to unveil a new tourist tax during the November 26 Budget. The plan would allow the Mayor of London, Labour’s Sir Sadiq Khan, and other local officials to impose charges on overnight stays in hotels, Airbnbs, and other short-term rentals. The measure is likely to be delivered through the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, which is currently before Parliament.

Mayor Khan has been a strong supporter of the idea, noting that cities such as Paris, New York, and Tokyo already impose similar fees. “The thing about those cities is, many of us visit them, and don’t really mind paying the extra few euros, in relation to a tourism levy,” he claimed earlier this year.

Supporters say the levy could generate roughly £250 million (~$342m) a year. Industry groups, however, warn that it could push up prices for travelers, who are already contributing to the local economy by spending money there, and discourage them from visiting. UKHospitality called the proposal “shocking.”

Other parts of Britain are already moving ahead with similar measures. Edinburgh and Glasgow, in Scotland, are planning a five percent tax on short stays beginning next year. Wales has approved a national tourist levy, set to take effect in 2027.

Reeves, who had previously voiced doubts about tourist taxes, now appears convinced they could provide a valuable new revenue stream. Her upcoming budget is expected to include several other tax changes, including a gambling tax and a new road fee for electric vehicles.

The debate over London’s visitor economy comes at a moment when the city is facing broader concerns about migration and pressure on hotels. Recent controversies include hotels removing guests or firing staff so they can house newly arrived boat migrants, some of whom have become embroiled in high-profile criminal cases.

Image by Steve Eason.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Court Bans Mom from Taking Her Daughter to Church or Teaching Her the Bible.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Maine Supreme Judicial Court is reviewing a case involving a custody order that barred a mother from taking her daughter to church or exposing her to Bible teachings, raising constitutional questions about parental rights and religious freedom.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Emily Bickford, the mother, and Matthew Bradeen, the father, are at the center of the case, with attorneys Mathew Staver and Michelle King representing them, respectively.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The custody order was issued on December 13, 2024, by the Portland District Court; oral arguments before the Maine Supreme Judicial Court occurred on November 13, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’ve never seen in the history of my career an order as hostile as this one… that order reeks with that kind of hostility.” – Mathew Staver

🎯IMPACT: The decision could set a national precedent on how courts balance parental rights, religious freedom, and claims of psychological harm in custody disputes.

IN FULL

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court is considering whether a Portland District Court judge violated constitutional limits by preventing a mother, Emily Bickford, from taking her 12-year-old daughter to church or introducing her to Bible teachings. The dispute, Bickford v. Bradeen, has drawn national attention because it touches on the intersection of parental rights, religious liberty, and judicial power in family law cases.

The lower court’s December 13, 2024, order gave the child’s father, Matthew Bradeen, exclusive authority over all religious decisions. The judge relied on testimony that the child experienced emotional turmoil connected to material presented at Calvary Chapel, the church Bickford attends. Expert witnesses described the church’s imagery, such as depictions of “fallen angels” and messages about “eternal suffering,” as sources of anxiety and confusion for the child. The judge concluded that exposure to these Christian teachings risked “psychological harm.”

During oral arguments on November 13, 2025, Bickford’s attorney, Mathew Staver, said the restrictions were unconstitutional and imposed a “total veto” on the mother’s ability to share her faith with her daughter. Staver argued that the court failed to meet the constitutional threshold required to restrict a parent’s religious expression, emphasizing, “There is no finding of abuse or neglect.” He warned that the order granted the father sweeping, unchecked control over any religious activity involving the child. “I’ve never seen in the history of my career an order as hostile as this one… that order reeks with that kind of hostility,” Staver said.

Representing Bradeen, attorney Michelle King defended the order as a narrowly tailored measure intended to protect the child’s well-being. She said the court relied on “expert” testimony showing a direct link between the child’s distress and the specific content of the church’s teachings. King argued that the judge acted within the broad discretion traditionally afforded to family courts.

The justices questioned attorneys on both sides about where courts should draw the line when ruling on parents’ religious practices. They examined whether the “best interest of the child” standard can justify significant restrictions on constitutionally protected religious activity and how much evidence of harm is required before the state may intervene.

The case comes amid broader national debates over government involvement in religious matters. In recent years, lawmakers in several states advanced proposals intruding on core religious practices, including attempts to compel Catholic and Orthodox priests to report information heard during confession. Such efforts prompted federal lawsuits, Justice Department interventions, and, in some cases, states backing down after courts or religious leaders challenged the measures.

Image by Farragutful.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

College Student Reprimanded for Honoring Charlie Kirk with TPUSA Hat.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A student at Oklahoma State University (OSU) was reprimanded for wearing a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) hat during a student government meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: OSU junior John Wilson and a coordinator of the Student Government Association program.

📍WHEN & WHERE: September 10, 2025, at an Oklahoma State University Student Government Association meeting.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Idea and conversation is what built this country, and it’s what should maintain it. And that’s what the hat was there for.” – John Wilson

🎯IMPACT: The incident raises questions about free speech and political expression on college campuses.

IN FULL

A student leader at Oklahoma State University (OSU) says he was reprimanded by a staff member after wearing a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) hat while delivering a tribute to Charlie Kirk during a Student Government Association (SGA) meeting on September 10, 2025. John Wilson, president of the OSU Debate Society and a member of the student government, wore the hat, a gift from Kirk, as he addressed fellow students following the conservative commentator’s assassination earlier that day.

Wilson described Kirk as “a father, a husband, a devout Christian, and a shining light for so many,” and condemned the killing as “horrendous and vile, just as political violence of any kind is.” He urged students to engage in open dialogue, saying such conversations were essential to the country’s foundation.

Although the remarks reportedly received applause, Wilson says he was later confronted by the SGA program coordinator, who objected to the hat. According to a recording provided to the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, she told him that her family, who “don’t look like you,” were upset by what the hat represented. Wilson replied that his intention was to highlight the value of open discussion, saying, “Idea and conversation is what built this country, and it’s what should maintain it. And that’s what the hat was there for.”

When the coordinator raised her identity, he noted his own Native American ancestry. He says he was warned that his stance could make the year “difficult” for him, which he interpreted as a threat. OSU later stated that while student government is traditionally nonpartisan, no campus rules prohibit partisan expression. Civil liberties advocates expressed concern that the reprimand could chill student speech.

The dispute unfolded amid intense national reaction to Kirk’s murder, with many leftists attacking him. Author Stephen King issued a limited apology after falsely claiming Kirk had supported executing gay people, acknowledging he had misinterpreted remarks about biblical law.

In Britain, the Oxford Union’s president-elect was voted out of his position after messages surfaced showing him celebrating the assassination. Comedian Trevor Noah also faced criticism after joking that it was “funny” that Kirk was shot while defending gun rights.

In Congress, Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) claimed she felt for Kirk’s family but asserted that he had “no legacy to honor,” labeling him a promoter of hate. A subsequent Republican attempt to censure her failed.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Tariffs Pressure India Into Agreeing to Source Gas from U.S.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: India signed a deal with the U.S. covering nearly 10 percent of its liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) imports.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: India, the United States, President Donald J. Trump, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on November 17, 2025, with the LPG sourced from the U.S. Gulf Coast.

🎯IMPACT: The deal represents a significant win for the Trump administration, with India previously taking advantage of Western sanctions on Russia to source energy from the Kremlin at a discount.

IN FULL

On Monday, India‘s government announced a “significant” agreement with the Trump administration to source nearly 10 percent of its liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) imports from the United States. The move comes as India seeks to diversify its energy imports away from Russia in the face of U.S. tariffs and threatened sanctions.

Relations between India and the U.S. have been fraught since August, when President Donald J. Trump announced he would impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on Indian goods, as the country had rejected American demands that it stop taking advantage of the Western sanctions war with Russia to purchase cut-price Russian energy. U.S. officials have consistently accused India of clandestinely supporting Russia’s war efforts in Ukraine economically through these purchases.

Hardeep Singh Puri, India’s Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas, stated that India signed a one-year deal for 2.2 million tonnes per annum of LPG from the U.S. Gulf Coast. This contract marks “the first structured contract of U.S. LPG for the Indian market.”

The Indian economy, the fifth-largest globally, has shown growth, but U.S. tariffs pose a potential risk. Experts have warned U.S. tariffs could reduce Indian GDP growth by 60 to 80 basis points.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Human Trafficking Spiked in This Democrat-Led City Amid Gang Activity.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A significant rise in human trafficking cases took place in North Carolina last year, with 301 cases and 580 victims identified in 2024, according to the National Human Trafficking Hotline.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Victims included 214 females, 63 males, and four gender minorities. Traffickers often include organized crime groups such as the Bloods, as well as criminals targeting minors.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The cases occurred primarily in the Charlotte area, with a 76 percent increase in minor trafficking cases from 2020 to 2024. North Carolina is ranked ninth in the U.S. for human trafficking.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Trafficking happens everywhere. It happens in every city and every town, whether you’re rural [or in a] city – it really doesn’t matter.” – Hannah Arrowood, executive director of Present Age Ministries.

🎯IMPACT: The rise in trafficking highlights vulnerabilities in local law enforcement resources, as well as the need for increased vigilance among parents and communities.

IN FULL

North Carolina saw a troubling increase in human trafficking cases last year, with 301 cases involving 580 victims reported in 2024, according to data from the National Human Trafficking Hotline. These cases include sex trafficking, labor trafficking, and other forms of exploitation. Of the reported cases, 145 involved sex trafficking, 73 involved labor trafficking, and 38 combined both forms.

Experts attribute the rise to several factors, including North Carolina’s expansive interstate highway system, demand for cheap foreign labor in the agricultural sector, and a surge in gang activity. “Part of the reason why Charlotte is such a huge trafficking hub is because of the highway system,” said Toby Braun, founder of the American Special Investigative Group. “A lot of these traffickers are running victims and may start in South Florida… Oftentimes there, they may put them in safe houses.”

Hannah Arrowood, executive director of Present Age Ministries, noted that traffickers target children in both urban and rural areas, with many victims being minors. Data from the Charlotte Metro Human Trafficking Task Force revealed that 48 percent of trafficking cases in 2024 involved individuals aged 15 or younger. From 2020 to 2024, Charlotte experienced a 76 percent increase in reported cases of minor trafficking.

Organized crime groups, such as the Bloods, play a significant role in trafficking operations in Charlotte, according to Braun. “The Bloods have a huge stronghold in human trafficking. They’re one of the primary organized crime groups responsible for trafficking [in Charlotte].” Arrowood also highlighted the prevalence of online platforms as a recruitment tool, describing the process as “digital grooming.”

Despite the alarming numbers, many cases remain unreported due to the covert nature of trafficking crimes and limited resources within law enforcement agencies. Arrowood emphasized the challenges local officials face, stating, “Agencies are just always at limited capacity in terms of the amount of work, or the amount of people and manpower they have to manage the amount of referrals that are coming in.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

BBC Leadership Want to Fight Trump in Court Over Doctored Speech Clip.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The BBC is facing a multi-billion-dollar legal threat from President Donald J. Trump over a Panorama edit that misleadingly spliced a speech he gave on January 6, 2021.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, BBC Chairman Samir Shah, former Director-General Tim Davie, and former news chief Deborah Turness.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The legal threat emerged this week, with internal BBC discussions ongoing in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We’ll sue them for anywhere between $1 billion and $5 billion, probably sometime next week.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The BBC is determined to fight the claim, citing the need to protect its license fee payers, while grappling with internal staff frustration and public scrutiny.

IN FULL

India-born BBC chairman Samir Shah has declared that Britain’s de facto state broadcaster is “determined” to fight President Donald J. Trump’s multi-billion-dollar legal challenge and “protect our licence fee payers.” This refers to the compulsory television license, which every television owner who watches live programming must pay to fund the BBC, even if nothing they watch is BBC content.

In a freshly circulated internal memo, Shah emphasized: “I want to be very clear with you—our position has not changed. There is no basis for a defamation case, and we are determined to fight this.” Shah was addressing the recent scandal involving misleading edits of a speech by President Donald J. Trump on January 6, 2021, which spliced together different sections of his address to make it appear as though he was inciting violence. This ultimately prompted the resignations of Director-General Tim Davie and news chief Deborah Turness.

While the BBC issued an apology to Trump, Shah—describing the edit as an “error of judgement”—insisted there’s no valid defamation claim against the U.S. President. “There is a lot being written, said and speculated upon about the possibility of legal action, including potential costs or settlements,” Shah said, “In all this, we are, of course, acutely aware of the privilege of our funding and the need to protect our licence fee payers, the British public.”

The $1 billion figure President Trump has said he may sue for amounts to about twice the BBC’s yearly news and current affairs spending, although far less than its overall license fee takings annually. On Friday, Trump suggested he may push for a higher sum, telling reporters, “We’ll sue them for anywhere between $1 billion and $5 billion, probably sometime next week.”

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Labour Party Labels Farage ‘Today’s Enoch Powell’… As If That’s A Bad Thing?

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: British Business Secretary Peter Kyle compared Reform Party leader Nigel Farage to former Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Enoch Powell, who warned in the 1960s of the disastrous consequences of mass migration, describing him as “today’s incarnation” of Powell’s politics.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Peter Kyle, Nigel Farage, and other speakers at the Co-operative Party conference, including Communities Secretary Steve Reed.

📍WHEN & WHERE: November 15, at the Co-operative Party conference.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Lack of economic growth is the cause. Nigel Farage, today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell, is the effect” – Peter Kyle

🎯IMPACT: The remarks drew attention to the ongoing influence of Powell, who passed away in 1998, over the immigration debate and British politics legacy.

IN FULL

Britain’s Business Secretary Peter Kyle attempted to smear Reform UK leader Nigel Farage at the Co-operative Party conference on November 15, describing him as “today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell.” Enoch Powell, who passed away in 1998, is well-known for a host of achievements, including being the youngest professor in the British Empire in 1937 at only 25 years old, and a highly decorated war veteran, signing up for the army in October of 1939 as a private and ending the Second World War as a brigadier, the equivalent of a brigadier general, the youngest in the British army. However, he is best remembered for his so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968, where he warned that mass migration was causing social disintegration.

Kyle, a member of the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s leftist Labour Party government, argued that Britain’s stalled economic growth is eroding confidence in democratic institutions and creating space for “the parties of the far right,” whose “dogma of disruption, division and despair” has become “alluring.”

He said the political approach of Nigel Farage’s Reform Party resembles that of the quasi-fascist National Front and the British National Party in previous decades. He added, “Lack of economic growth is the cause. Nigel Farage, today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell, is the effect.”

In his “Rivers of Blood” speech, Powell warned, “Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.” Powell’s intervention received broad public support, but a furious reaction from the political class, with the Conservatives’ then-leader, Edward “Ted” Heath, expelling him from the Shadow Cabinet.

Notably, gross immigration to Britain in 2024 stood at around 950,000 a year.

Kyle’s remarks reflect an ongoing tension between Kyle and Farage. Earlier this year, they clashed during debates over the Online Safety Act, with Kyle accusing Farage of siding with harmful influences by opposing the legislation, which empowers the authorities to further censor the Internet and prosecute online speech. Farage rejected the accusation and condemned the Act as a threat to free expression, even testifying about the legislation to the U.S. Congress earlier this year.

Immigration to Britain reached historic highs under Conservative former prime ministers Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, and remains high under Starmer, putting pressure on public services, limiting integration, and undermining social cohesion. Rising illegal immigration and high levels of crime among migrants, particularly sex crimes, have intensified public concerns.

The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam, a former adviser to Nigel Farage, revisited Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech in his book Enoch Was Right: “Rivers of Blood” 50 Years On in 2018. Kassam argues that many of Powell’s warnings about migration, demographics, and social cohesion have proved prescient, and asserts that political leaders have avoided serious engagement with Powell’s arguments by dismissing them as racist rather than debating them directly.

Enoch Was Right: “Rivers of Blood” 50 Years On can be purchased here.

Image by Allan Warren.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.