GET THE APP
Monday, August 24, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Health
News

Trump Tells Parents to Avoid Multi-Shot Vaccines, Reduce Autism Risk.

President Trump has emphasized that he believes that vaccine reform will lead to a dramatic reduction in autism diagnoses.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump stated his belief that multi-shot vaccines and the autism “epidemic” in the U.S are linked at a Monday event centered on school choice in the White House Rose Garden.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’re strongly requesting, even telling people, when you get your shots for your young child, and this has to do, we think, with preventing autism, that you go to the doctor for five small shots instead of one big, massive shot. You do it in five different shots. Five different shots, small, little shots, where those beautiful little bodies can handle it. And I think you’re going to see a very big difference in the rate of autism, which is like an epidemic, what’s happened with autism.” – President Trump.
🎯 IMPACT: Trump made his statement while touting his administration’s Make America Health Again (MAHA) agenda, strongly associated with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Alongside vaccine reform, the President referenced the revived Presidential Fitness Test and the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, passed in 2025. The proposed changes to vaccine administration could influence public health policy and parental choices regarding vaccinations, while enraging pharmaceutical firms that manufacture vaccines and the politicians they financially support.
📰 FLASHBACK: President Trump’s skepticism of multi-shot vaccines dates back to at least 2014, when he famously tweeted, “Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn’t feel good and changes – AUTISM. Many such cases!” He stood by this position when interrogated on it during the Republican presidential primary in 2015, citing personal experiences. “I’ve seen it… You take this little beautiful baby, and you pump—I mean, it looks just like it’s meant for a horse, not for a child. And we’ve had so many instances, people that work for me. Just the other day, two years old, two-and-a-half years old, a child, a beautiful child, went to have the vaccine, and came back. And a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

13 minutes ago
Economy
News

Canadian Premier Rages at ‘Dictator’ Trump, Threatens to Cut Off U.S. Power Supply.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has threatened to cut off electricity to the U.S. in retaliation for President Trump’s decision to increase tariffs on Canadian goods to 50 percent.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Doug Ford, Premier (Governor) of Ontario, Canada, has threatened to cut off electricity and critical mineral supplies to the United States as the trade dispute between Washington and Ottawa escalates. Ford said Ontario powers about 1.5 million American homes and businesses and warned President Donald J. Trump he had “better have a pack of batteries” if the tariff battle continues.
📰 DETAIL: Ford also said he would “cut them off” and declared, “You won’t get a grain of sand out of Ontario,” referring to the province’s mineral resources. Ford’s comments came after Trump announced plans to raise tariffs on Canadian steel, cars, trucks, and auto parts to 50 percent. Ford accused Trump of trying to weaken Canada’s economy and move Canadian manufacturing into the United States, while saying Canada should consider using its natural resources as leverage. Trump replied to Ford’s comments, which also included telling the President to “kiss my ass,” in a Truth Social post shortly after. Trump called Ford’s comments “bluster” and called him a “flunky” of Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney. Later in the day on Monday, Ford responded to the post, calling Trump a “dictator” and saying he would be campaigning for the Democrats in the November midterms if he was “allowed to,” despite his “Conservative” party affiliation.
👀 FLASHBACK: This is not the first time trade tensions have flared between the U.S. and Canada, with previous threats involving tariffs on steel and aluminum being exchanged and later revoked.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Lots of ‘bluster’ from Doug Ford, who is the Premier of the Canadian Province of Ontario, but who is better known as the less charismatic, intelligent, and overall unimpressive brother of the late, great, Rob Ford. America has been carrying Canada for decades, but no longer!” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The escalating trade fight could put significant pressure on both the American and Canadian economies, particularly if Ontario follows through on threats to restrict electricity and critical mineral exports. Ultimately, however, the U.S. accounts for a far larger share of Canadian exports than vice versa, meaning America’s roughly 40 million-strong population has more to lose from an extended trade war.

Image by Joey Coleman.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has threatened to cut off electricity to the U.S. in retaliation for President Trump's decision to increase tariffs on Canadian goods to 50 percent.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Culture
News

Conservatives Are Having More Children Than Liberals Amid Left-Wing ‘Baby Bust.’

A new study highlights a growing ideological divide in birth rates, with conservatives reporting significantly more children on average than liberals.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A growing ideological divide has emerged in American fertility patterns, with conservatives reporting more children on average than liberals, according to research from the Institute for Family Studies (IFS). The study found that conservatives have an average of 1.4 children, compared with 1.09 among liberals, while 51 percent of liberals reported having no children compared with 40 percent of conservatives.
📺 DETAIL: Researchers based the findings on survey responses from roughly 7,000 Americans between the ages of 18 and 54, and said the differences remained statistically significant after accounting for factors including sex, religion, race, income, age, marital status, and education. The study also found that liberals tend to express greater concerns about parenthood, including mental health, genetics, and the stress associated with raising children. Eighteen percent of liberals said mental health concerns influenced their fertility decisions, compared with ten percent of conservatives, while 36 percent of liberals described parenting as highly complicated, difficult, or stressful, compared with 24 percent of conservatives. The ideological divide also appeared in preferred family size, with conservatives saying they ideally want 2.71 children on average, compared with 2.43 among moderates and 2.16 among liberals. According to IFS, the gap has widened considerably since 1994, suggesting the relationship between political ideology and family size is a relatively recent development.
🎯 IMPACT: The widening fertility gap between liberals and conservatives could have long-term implications for the country’s political and demographic landscape as differences in family size influence future generations. The findings also add to the broader debate over declining birth rates, with concerns about parenthood, mental health, and economic pressures potentially shaping Americans’ decisions about whether to have children.
📺 FLASHBACK: The Trump administration has promoted pro-family initiatives, including expanding access to IVF and introducing Trump Accounts to invest financially in future generations. Meanwhile, some prominent liberals, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), have chosen to delay or reconsider parenthood, with 36-year-old “AOC” recently sharing her decision to freeze her eggs—an expensive safeguard for aging career women that often fails disastrously.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new study highlights a growing ideological divide in birth rates, with conservatives reporting significantly more children on average than liberals.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
News
Politics
UK

Farage’s Reform Party Will Prioritize British Parents, Veterans, and Young People for Social Housing.

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has unveiled a plan to prioritize British parents, veterans, and young workers over foreign nationals for social housing.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has announced a policy to prioritize British-born workers for social housing.
📺 DETAIL: The party announced on Monday that British-born young workers, married couples with children, and military veterans would be prioritized for public housing. Reform estimates that roughly 540,000 social homes are occupied by foreign nationals. “It’s not fair that young British working families can’t get on the housing ladder when overseas nationals have come to the UK and, because of the current rules based on need rather than suitability, they have jumped ahead in the queue. We just don’t think that’s right: I can’t think of another country where you rock up with a family and you expect the local taxpayer in that country to pay for your housing needs,” said Tice. The party also plans to raise £10 billion (~$13.6bn) to build 50,000 homes per year through measures such as reintroducing Right to Buy, a scheme first introduced by Margaret Thatcher which allows social housing occupants to buy their homes, and leveraging local government pension funds.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’re saying that the first people we should be looking after are young, British workers—under 35, young British married couples, young British veterans—who have done the right thing. They’ve got a job, they’re doing their best, working in their community, setting a fine example, because the role of the British government is actually to look after British citizens first.” – Richard Tice, Reform Deputy Leader.
🎯 IMPACT: The proposal is the latest major announcement from Reform regarding welfare policy. Earlier this month, the party announced policies to limit most benefit payments to citizens in order to cut the state’s ballooning welfare bill. While the establishment parties have characterized Reform’s recent proposal as divisive, much of the British electorate is likely to support it, with much of the public viewing it as unfair for foreigners to receive social housing ahead of British citizens.
📺 FLASHBACK: Reform has said it plans to dismantle what it has characterized as an “international welfare state” and re-prioritize British-born workers. “What was once a national welfare state morphed into an international welfare state,” stressed Matthew Goodwin, an academic who served as a Reform parliamentary candidate earlier this year.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Nigel Farage's Reform UK party has unveiled a plan to prioritize British parents, veterans, and young workers over foreign nationals for social housing.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Economy
News

Trump Hikes Tariffs on Canadian Autos, Steel to 50%.

President Trump has stepped up America’s ongoing trade clash with Canada, announcing significant tariff increases on key Canadian imports.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump escalated his trade confrontation with Canada on Monday, announcing plans to raise tariffs on Canadian vehicles, auto parts, and steel to 50 percent beginning January 1, 2027. Trump accused Canada of imposing excessive tariffs on American agricultural products and blamed its trade policies for a large U.S. trade deficit.
📺 DETAIL: Trump also declared that Canada would no longer receive what he characterized as state-like treatment, backing away from his previous suggestion that it could become the 51st U.S. state. The announcement followed the administration’s decision Saturday to impose 50 percent tariffs on a range of Canadian imports, including beer, cheese, and electronics, after trade negotiations collapsed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has vowed to retaliate with dollar-for-dollar tariffs on American steel, dairy products, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and other goods beginning September 8. Carney described the U.S. measures as an attack on Canada and said his government had the resources and plans needed to respond. Both governments have accused the other of making unreasonable demands, with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer saying Canada sought too many concessions while Carney argued Washington demanded too much and offered too little. The escalating dispute could increase costs for businesses and consumers on both sides of the border.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Canada has been ripping off the United States of America for years… WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US!” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The escalating tariff battle between the United States and Canada risks disrupting one of the world’s largest bilateral trading relationships. With both governments preparing additional tariffs, the dispute could deepen economic tensions, disrupt North American supply chains and place enormous pressure on industries heavily dependent on cross-border trade.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has stepped up America's ongoing trade clash with Canada, announcing significant tariff increases on key Canadian imports.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
Crime
Immigration
News

Trump Signals There is an Active ICE Probe Into Ilhan Omar.

President Trump appeared to confirm that ICE is scrutinizing Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for immigration fraud in a post on Truth Social.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump appeared to confirm on Sunday that federal immigration authorities are examining Representative Ilhan Omar‘s (D-MN) immigration history, sharing a report on Truth Social about U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) refusing to release records related to its investigation into her by citing a federal exemption for materials that could interfere with active enforcement proceedings.
📰 DETAIL: The records may concern longstanding allegations that Omar’s 2009 marriage, to a Somali man claimed by some to be her brother, was fraudulent and arranged to benefit his immigration status. It may also relate to the fact that she may have failed to disclose her family’s role in allegedly committing war crimes in Somalia. Omar has consistently denied the allegations, calling them false and politically motivated. ICE has not announced any charges or confirmed that formal removal or criminal proceedings have been initiated against the Somalia-born congresswoman. Nevertheless, the agency’s response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for records related to her suggests that some form of federal review or enforcement action against her is active. Border Czar Tom Homan and Vice President JD Vance have previously said that the Trump administration ordered the review of Omar’s immigration files and that the Justice Department was examining the allegations.
🎯 IMPACT: The FOIA request rejection will intensify public scrutiny of Omar and raise fresh questions about whether the Trump administration is potentially pursuing immigration enforcement action against a sitting member of Congress.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Disclosure of any responsive records at this time could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings,” ICE stated in response to a FOIA request.

Image by Chad Davis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump appeared to confirm that ICE is scrutinizing Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for immigration fraud in a post on Truth Social.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

7 hours ago
News
UK

DATA: Majority of Britons Believe Free Speech Has Eroded Under Ruling Labour Party.

A new poll has revealed widespread public concern regarding the erosion of freedom of speech in the United Kingdom under the current Labour government.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Most Britons believe that freedom of speech has worsened under the ruling Labour Party, according to a new poll.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll conducted by Deltapoll, an independent polling firm, and commissioned by Liberty, a civil liberties organization, 51 percent of Britons say their confidence in the government to protect freedom of speech has worsened over the last two years. The poll revealed that 42 percent noted a decline in their ability to express controversial political opinions without legal consequences. In contrast, only nine percent said free speech protections had improved, while 39 percent of Britons said conditions had stayed the same. The poll also revealed that 39 percent of Britons believe that their ability to speak freely on important issues has worsened under Labour, which regained office after 14 years in opposition in July 2024. Britons also stated that they are less sure about what is and isn’t legal speech. Liberty attributed the decline in free speech confidence to policies such as travel bans on activists, mass arrests of protesters, and stricter protest laws. The organization highlighted bans on speakers at activist Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rallies and American far-left commentators Cenk Uyghur and Hasan Piker. The pollsters surveyed more than 2,000 adults.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The new Prime Minister [Andy Burnham] must see these findings as a warning sign. Free speech is a fundamental right that benefits us all, and a healthy democracy depends on people feeling confident that they can express themselves freely and disagree with each other.” – Akiko Hart, Liberty’s Director
🎯 IMPACT: The findings reinforce the already widespread belief that freedom of speech has effectively disappeared in Britain, especially under Labour. This data is likely to compound ongoing calls to liberalize the country’s speech laws and promote tolerance over self-censorship.
📺 FLASHBACK: The U.S. Department of State has previously expressed concerns that the United Kingdom is backsliding on freedom of speech. In early June, the State Department condemned the rise of two-tier policing in the country. “Ideological conditioning and two-tiered policing are glaring symptoms of civilizational decline. They must be rejected across the West,” the Department announced on X (formerly Twitter).

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed widespread public concern regarding the erosion of freedom of speech in the United Kingdom under the current Labour government.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

8 hours ago
Economy
News
War

Treasury Sec Bessent Declares ‘Economic D-Day’ Against Iran is Underway: ‘We Are Entering the Endgame.’

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has declared the “single greatest financial offensive ever marshaled” underway as of Monday morning, targeting Iran and its “enablers.”

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declared that the Trump administration is launching an unprecedented financial offensive against Iran, likening it to an “economic D-Day.” Writing in an article published late Sunday, Bessent stated that the Islamic Republic has been a “malignant force” for decades, both domestically and internationally, and that America’s patience has run out.
📺 DETAIL: Bessent compared the administration’s strategy to the 1943 Tehran Conference, where Allied leaders planned the defeat of Nazi Germany, and warned that nations enabling Iran’s regime, whether through oil purchases, financial facilitation, or other means, are making a dangerous gamble. “Iran’s enablers purchase and transport its petroleum. They facilitate the flow of its finances through exchange houses and free trade zones… In short, these countries calculate appeasement of the regime to be the safer course. But they would do well to consider the consequences of sustaining it,” the Treasury Secretary warned, invoking the philosopher Blaise Pascal’s famous wager on the existence of God—”If you [wager that God exists], you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing”—and urging any nation gambling that it can continue to sustain the Iranian regime to consider that the repercussions could be dire.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We are entering the endgame. At dawn begins an economic D-Day—the single greatest financial offensive ever marshaled against an adversary.” – Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, FT article published overnight
🎯 IMPACT: Bessent’s announcement signals a shift toward maximum economic pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran and its enablers, aiming to cripple the regime’s ability to fund the Islamic Revolutionar Guard Corps (IRGC), regular military, domestic repression apparatus, and international terror proxies. Bessent also suggested that nations aligning with U.S. efforts would gain greater access to global markets and economic confidence, while those continuing to support Iran would face serious consequences.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has declared the "single greatest financial offensive ever marshaled" underway as of Monday morning, targeting Iran and its "enablers."

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

August 22, 2026
Data
News
UK

DATA: Majority of Londoners Oppose Fourth Mayoral Term for Sadiq Khan.

Polling data has revealed that most Londoners want Mayor Sadiq Khan to stand down ahead of the next election, citing failure across a wide range of policy areas.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Most Londoners do not want Sadiq Khan to seek another term as Mayor of London, according to polling data.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll conducted by YouGov, 56 percent of Londoners think Khan should step down as Mayor ahead of the 2028 mayoral election. This includes 31 percent of people who voted for Khan at the last mayoral election in 2024. The poll also revealed that 55 percent of Londoners believe that London has become a worse place to live since Khan became Mayor back in 2016. Sixty-six percent of Londoners believe that Khan has handled housing “badly,” compared to just 17 percent who said the Mayor was handling the issue “well.” In addition, 76 percent of Londoners said that affordability has worsened in the capital over the past decade, compared to just five percent who said it has improved. The poll further revealed that 69 percent of Londoners believe that the economy of the capital has worsened over Khan’s tenure. Sixty-two percent of Londoners believe homelessness has worsened, 62 percent think high streets and public spaces have declined, and 58 percent believe that crime has worsened.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Only 24% of [Londoners] think [Khan] should run for a fourth term as Mayor of London,” said Matthew Smith, Data Journalist for YouGov.
🎯 IMPACT: This poll demonstrates that most Londoners agree with President Donald J. Trump, who has long been critical of Khan’s time as Mayor of London. “He’s a disaster. He’s a disaster. He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have,” the President said of the Mayor in December last year. The finding that a clear majority of people in the capital believe that Khan has failed on affordable housing, which the Mayor has consistently described as his main priority, is particularly bad, especially since he has been in office for a decade. Khan has been elected three times previously: first in 2016, again in 2021, and most recently in 2024.
📺 FLASHBACK: The Mayor and the President have a long-standing rivalry. “I’m not a fan of your mayor… He’s a nasty person,” said President Trump said in July last year. Khan has previously attacked the President as “racist, sexist, homophobic, and Islamophobic.”

Image via East London Mosque.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Polling data has revealed that most Londoners want Mayor Sadiq Khan to stand down ahead of the next election, citing failure across a wide range of policy areas.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

August 22, 2026
Data
News
UK

DATA: British Public Supports Tough Stance Against France on Migrant Boats.

A poll has revealed that a plurality of Britons support standing up to France to address illegal migrant crossings in the English Channel.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A plurality of around four in 10 Britons believe that the British government needs to take a tougher stance against France to address illegal migrant crossings in the English Channel, according to polling data. Significantly, Britain has paid hundreds of millions of pounds to France to stop the crossings, but the number of interceptions has actually declined.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll conducted by YouGov, the largest polling firm in Britain, 41 percent of Britons think their government should take a tougher stance against France. By contrast, 35 percent supported a closer relationship with France to stop the boats transporting illegal migrants across the English Channel. The poll also revealed that 79 percent of supporters of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which has pitched a military operation to return boat migrants to France, believe the government should take a tougher stance. Sixty-seven percent of people supporting Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch’s nominally center-right Conservative Party said the same. In contrast, only 24 percent of Labour voters supported taking a harder line. Twenty-four percent of people backing the Liberal Democrats, a pro-open borders party that supports rejoining the European Union (EU), said the same. Meanwhile, only 19 percent of those backing Zack Polanski’s far-left Green Party want the government to take a tougher stance on France to stop the illegal crossings.
🎯 IMPACT: The poll reflects declining confidence in the British government’s failed “one-in, one-out” deal, which mandates that for every migrant the British government returns to France after an illegal crossing, Britain will admit one different legal migrant from France. However, earlier this month, it was revealed that 1,117 migrants have been admitted to the United Kingdom while only 1,087 illegals have been taken out of the country, for a slight increase in migrants overall.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A poll has revealed that a plurality of Britons support standing up to France to address illegal migrant crossings in the English Channel.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

August 22, 2026
Crime
Immigration
News

Over 80% of North African Migrants Have Been Accused of at Least One Crime in This European Country:

New data reveals a massive overrepresentation of North African asylum seekers among accused criminals.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  Swiss migration figures show that about 80.5 percent of asylum seekers from Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia have been accused of at least one offense, compared with 12.5 percent among asylum seekers overall. The figures from Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) indicate that North African applicants are significantly overrepresented among those accused of crimes. Their asylum claims are also rarely successful, with roughly 99 percent of applications reportedly rejected, according to Swiss media.
📺 DETAIL: Switzerland introduced an accelerated asylum process for applicants from several North African countries in 2024, allowing officials to quickly handle cases considered unlikely to result in protection. Officials say the process can nevertheless be prolonged when applicants decline to provide fingerprints, miss scheduled appointments, or fail to appear for deportation. SEM spokesman Daniel Bach said removing people convicted or repeatedly accused of criminal offenses remains a priority for the country’s asylum policy. Swiss authorities are considering expanding the use of coercive measures and tighter rules surrounding administrative detention to facilitate removals.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Criminals must leave Switzerland quickly. This is a priority of the asylum strategy,” said SEM spokesman Daniel Bach.
🎯 IMPACT: The figures are likely to intensify debate in Switzerland over the effectiveness of its asylum system and whether accelerated procedures and deportations are sufficient to address criminality among migrants. The data could also increase pressure on Swiss authorities to strengthen cooperation with North African governments to accelerate deportations.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New data reveals a massive overrepresentation of North African asylum seekers among accused criminals.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad