A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against new USPS rules on mail-in ballots, citing supposed risks of voter disenfranchisement ahead of upcoming elections.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has blocked the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from implementing new rules backed by President Donald J. Trump that would introduce extra safeguards for mail-in voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols issued a preliminary injunction Sunday, claiming that the rules could increase the risk that otherwise valid mail ballots would not be counted. 📺 DETAIL: The ruling follows a similar decision by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston. The Supreme Court is considering an appeal from the Trump administration following that ruling. The new Postal Service rules require ballot-envelope designs to receive federal approval and require states to upload voter information to a new USPS portal. The regulations also establish a verification process under which USPS could reject ballots that do not comply with the new requirements, to safeguard against voter impersonation and other forms of electoral fraud. Nichols had previously declined to block Trump’s executive order because the lawsuit was filed before the administration issued formal regulations. Plaintiffs renewed their challenge after USPS finalized the rule in August. The Supreme Court is now positioned to play a central role in determining whether the restrictions can take effect before the November midterms. 🎯 IMPACT: The ruling represents another legal obstacle to the Trump administration’s effort to improve election integrity before the midterms. With two federal judges now blocking the new Postal Service rules and the Supreme Court considering the dispute, the outcome will have broader implications for the federal government’s ability to safeguard federal elections. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.