GET THE APP
Monday, September 21, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

50 minutes ago
Immigration
News
UK

Second English Village Considers Declaring Independence to Stop Migrant Influx.

Residents in the English village of Barnham, Suffolk, are exploring a referendum on seceding from the United Kingdom, in protest of government plans to house over 1,200 asylum seekers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The village of Barnham, Suffolk, is considering following Piddington in holding a referendum to declare independence from London over plans by Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s Labour Party government to house 1,250 male asylum seekers at a former Royal Air Force (RAF) base nearby. Crucially, the migrants will not be confined to the base, being free to roam among the public.
📺 DETAIL: The Home Office’s plan involves turning the RAF Barnham site into accommodation for male asylum seekers aged 18-65. This has sparked widespread unease in the village, which has a population of just under 600, and would be demographically swamped by the influx. Concerns range from public safety to the inevitable strain on local resources, with residents noting that the village has only a village hall, school, and church, with no pubs, shops, or other amenities to occupy hundreds of bored foreign men.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’ve seen what Piddington has done, and they’ve had a fantastic impact. They’ve really raised the profile of the whole issue. We would like to add our weight. If two villages work together, it would be far better than both villages working independently. We’re aiming not to duplicate what they’re doing but to learn from it. If a second village were to vote, even symbolically, to secede from the UK, it would be equally powerful.” – John Bauer, Barnham Parish Council Chairman
🎯 IMPACT: If Barnham follows Piddington’s lead, it could increase pressure on the government to address local opposition to asylum housing plans. The symbolic votes underscore the growing tensions in rural communities over government-orchestrated mass migration, and their impact on local safety, resources, and the social fabric of small, settled communities.
📺 FLASHBACK: In Piddington, a referendum on secession from the United Kingdom organized by the parish council saw an overwhelming majority vote for independence on a 92 percent turnout. The move drew national attention, with the villagers receiving the support of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which has pledged to deport illegal immigrants at scale if it comes to government following Britain’s next general election, which must be held no later than 2029 but could be triggered earlier.

Image by Adrian S Pye.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

9 minutes ago
Crime
News

Suspects in Haitian Leader’s Assassination Extradited to U.S., Charged with Funding Plot Using COVID Fraud Funds.

The extradition of 18 suspects to the U.S. marks a significant development in the investigation into the 2021 assassination of the late Haitian President Jovenel Moïse, with federal prosecutors alleging a South Florida-based conspiracy funded by fraudulent U.S. taxpayer dollars.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Eighteen suspects allegedly involved in the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moïse in 2021 have been extradited to the United States to face federal charges. The suspects arrived in Miami, Florida, under heavy guard, accused of financing the murder plot with money defrauded from American taxpayers.
📺 DETAIL: Federal prosecutors allege that the assassination was orchestrated and financed in South Florida, with fraudulent COVID-19 Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans funding the operation. The plot reportedly involved recruiting Colombian mercenaries and acquiring weapons and tactical gear. The suspects allegedly posed as Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents to gain access to the Haitian president’s residence in Port-au-Prince, where he was killed in July 2021.
🎯 IMPACT: The case underscores the misuse of U.S. taxpayer funds in international criminal schemes and the challenges of prosecuting such cases across borders. The transfer of suspects to the U.S. also raises concerns about the Haitian justice system’s inability to handle high-profile cases effectively.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This assassination plot was planned, financed, conspired, here in Miami .It’s not only just holding people accountable for committing murder, but it’s holding people accountable if they use government funds in a fraud to facilitate that murder,” said U.S. Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones.
📺 FLASHBACK: Haitian President Jovenel Moïse was killed in his private residence in July 2021, creating a political vacuum in Haiti and intensifying the unrest in the island nation. Earlier this year, four ringleaders of the plot were convicted in Miami, with some facing life sentences.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The extradition of 18 suspects to the U.S. marks a significant development in the investigation into the 2021 assassination of the late Haitian President Jovenel Moïse, with federal prosecutors alleging a South Florida-based conspiracy funded by fraudulent U.S. taxpayer dollars.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Media
News

Fox News Joins White House Boycott After Trump Bans ‘Fake News’ CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO.

Corporate media outlets are joining forces against President Trump after he revoked the White House access of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Fox News has joined other corporate news outlets in suspending White House television pool coverage after President Donald J. Trump announced a ban on CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and POLITICO for corruption and spreading “fake news.” White House pool coverage provides shared media access to White House events.
📺 DETAIL: The boycott affects planned coverage of President Trump’s scheduled events, including appearances at the White House and the United Nations. CNN, which had been designated as the TV pool provider for September 21, was blocked from doing so by the ban, and other outlets have refused to make alternative arrangements. Fox News is joined by ABC News, CBS News, and NBC News in solidarity with CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO against the Trump administration.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government. No administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting.” – White House television pool statement
🎯 IMPACT: CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO have announced plans to sue the Trump administration, arguing that the ban violates their First Amendment rights. The Trump administration is likely to argue that First Amendment protections for press freedom do not extend to a corporate media right to automatic access to the White House, which is not available to journalists generally. President Trump has said the banned outlets are peddling “fake news” in a manner that is “corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control,” presenting a threat to national security.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is not the first time the Trump administration has clashed with media outlets, previously barring the Associated Press (AP) for its partisan decision to continue referring to the Gulf of America as the “Gulf of Mexico,” despite its redesignation by the federal government.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Corporate media outlets are joining forces against President Trump after he revoked the White House access of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
News
Politics

Populist AfD Wins Another German State Election as Ruling Party Suffers Historic Defeat.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s CDU has suffered more unprecedented losses in Germany’s state elections, raising questions about his leadership as the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) advances.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has scored another major state election victory, emerging as the largest party in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania as Chancellor (Prime Minister) Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) suffered a historic defeat. The AfD won around 38.2 percent of the vote, narrowly ahead of the left-wing Social Democratic Party (SPD). The CDU, formerly led by Angela Merkel, fell to just 4.9 percent and failed to clear the five percent threshold required to secure seats in the state legislature.
📺 DETAIL: The result marks the first time the CDU has failed to enter a state legislature in the history of Germany’s post-war Federal Republic. The AfD’s victory follows its breakthrough in Saxony-Anhalt two weeks earlier, reinforcing its growing electoral strength in eastern Germany. In Berlin, the AfD also recorded a strong showing relative to the area’s political demographics, finishing third with 16.3 percent of the vote, behind the CDU and Die Linke (The Left), which pushed the ruling party into second place. Merz described the Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania result as a “disaster” but rejected calls to step aside as Chancellor and party leader, insisting he would continue pursuing his government’s economic reforms. Despite winning the most votes in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, the AfD is unlikely to be part of the state government, because the establishment and far-left parties have ruled out cooperating with it in any way—a political “firewall” critics describe as anti-democratic.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Friedrich Merz is the wrong Chancellor for the CDU, and he is dragging the party down with him.” – AfD leader Alice Weidel
🎯 IMPACT: The AfD’s latest regional victory signals continued growth for the party, particularly in eastern Germany, while putting additional pressure on Chancellor Merz and the establishment parties to respond to voter dissatisfaction.

Image by Michael Lucan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Chancellor Friedrich Merz's CDU has suffered more unprecedented losses in Germany's state elections, raising questions about his leadership as the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) advances.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
Media
News

Memory Holed: BBC Mass Deletes Popular Comedy Series Because It No Longer ‘Works Today.’

The BBC has removed 11 sketches from That Mitchell and Webb Look on its iPlayer service, claiming that they no longer “work today,” sparking debate over censorship.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The BBC has edited That Mitchell and Webb Look for its 20th anniversary on iPlayer, removing 11 comedy sketches it deems inappropriate for 2026.
📰 DETAIL: The decision was reportedly made in consultation with show creators David Mitchell and Robert Webb, best known for the sitcom Peep Show, although they have not publicly commented on the edits as of the time of publication. The cut sketches featured blackface—presented in a critical manner—and Mitchell wearing a burka, as well as references to racial stereotypes, with the BBC insisting, “This is a 20-year-old sketch show; in consultation with the programme makers, we have included the ones that still work today and not the ones that don’t.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: Comedian Dom Joly described the cuts as “classic BBC overkill” and “hysterical censorship” in comments to the British press.
🎯 IMPACT: The move has reignited debates over censorship in Britain, where sharing “grossly offensive” content is a crime even in private WhatsApp groups, and the preservation of even relatively recent historical media.
👀 FLASHBACK: The censorship of That Mitchell and Webb Look follows a similar pattern seen after the Black Lives Matter disorder in 2020, which spread to Britain with low-level riots and the vandalization of statues of Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln, and others, with shows like Little Britain being edited to censor comedy sketches touching on race.

Join Pulse to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The BBC has removed 11 sketches from That Mitchell and Webb Look on its iPlayer service, claiming that they no longer "work today," sparking debate over censorship.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
Lawfare
Media
News

MS NOW, CNN, POLITICO Sue Trump Admin Over White House Ban.

Three corporate media outlets have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging First Amendment and due process violations after they were banned from the White House.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and POLITICO announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration after they were barred from the White House. The corporate media outlets allege that the ban violates their First Amendment rights, as well as due process protections under the Fifth Amendment.
📺 DETAIL: The lawsuit claims that the White House revoked press credentials without notice or an opportunity to appeal, accusing the administration of retaliation for unfavorable news coverage. President Donald J. Trump explained on Monday that his administration was not attacking the free press, but “corrupt” organizations intentionally spreading “FAKE NEWS,” which he characterized as an endemic disease. The administration is likely to argue that the First Amendment does not grant corporate media outlets a right to be part of the White House press corps, which is not open to all journalists or regular citizens by default.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The White House is not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish. It is instituting an assault on the FAKE NEWS, something that has grown like Cancer in our beloved United States of America. It is corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control. It is a threat to our National Security, and must be stopped, NOW!” – President Donald J. Trump
🎯 IMPACT: If successful, the lawsuit could allow the media outlets to force their way back into the White House. Conversely, a ruling in favor of the Trump administration could make it clear that First Amendment protections for a free press do not extend to a constitutional right to White House access for the corporate media.
📺 FLASHBACK: In a similar case, the Associated Press was banned from the White House press pool last year over its use of “Gulf of Mexico” instead of “Gulf of America.” While a district judge initially ruled the ban unconstitutional, an appeals court sided with the Trump administration, and the AP remains excluded from the press pool.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Three corporate media outlets have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging First Amendment and due process violations after they were banned from the White House.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Crime
Election Integrity
News

DHS is Investigating 1,620 Voter Fraud Cases Involving Noncitizens.

The Department of Homeland Security has launched a significant investigation into potential voter fraud involving noncitizens, with over 150 arrests already made.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is investigating 1,620 cases of voter fraud involving noncitizens, according to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin. The department has already made 151 arrests and is examining an additional 300,000 cases based on state voter roll data.
📺 DETAIL: In an interview with Fox News, Mullin explained that the cases are being scrutinized by comparing voter rolls with data on illegal immigrants, legal permanent residents, and citizens to determine voting legality. Mullin emphasized that cases of illegal voting effectively cancel out the votes of legally registered citizens. He also noted that the investigations’ findings support President Donald J. Trump’s claims of voter fraud in past elections.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’re scrubbing [states’ voter rolls]. We’re comparing them to those that are in the country illegally, those that are legal permanent residents, and those that are citizens… Every single vote that we talk about, that was at the hands of an illegal, canceled out a citizen that was legally registered and able to vote,” Mullin said.
🎯 IMPACT: The DHS investigations highlight the Trump administration’s ongoing concerns about election integrity and the potential for illegal voting to undermine the democratic process. The scale of the cases under review underscores the need for electoral reforms, such as the SAVE America Act, although the Democrats have consistently resisted in Congress and at the state level. Significantly, academic research indicates that foreign nationals vote illegally in sufficient numbers to alter election outcomes, in ways that tend to favor the Democrats.

Image by Joe Mabel.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Homeland Security has launched a significant investigation into potential voter fraud involving noncitizens, with over 150 arrests already made.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

September 19, 2026
Immigration
News

Democrat Senate Candidate Says She Would Trade Five Americans for One Illegal Alien.

Democrat Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner’s remarks on preferring illegal immigrant workers over Americans have invited backlash in Arkansas.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Hallie Shoffner, a Democrat candidate for the U.S. Senate in Arkansas, declared her preference for illegal immigrant farm workers over American workers during a podcast interview, sparking significant backlash.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Every farmer will tell you at one point, we did, or still do, employ undocumented [sic] immigrants, and it’s absolutely ridiculous that these folks are being rounded up because they’re hardworking people. They’re some of the best people we know, and honestly, we’d trade five Americans for just one of them because of how hard they work,” Shoffner said.
🎯 IMPACT: Shoffner’s comments have drawn criticism the public and from her opponent, Senator Tom Cotton, who argue that such views undermine American workers. They are likely to harm her campaign in a predominantly conservative state.
📰 DETAIL: Shoffner, who recently closed her farm due to high costs, is challenging Cotton as a supposedly moderate Democrat, but is now facing renewed scrutiny over her extreme pro-illegal immigration stance. Her campaign has attracted attention from Democrat donors, especially after one poll showed her leading Cotton by three points.
👀 FLASHBACK: Republicans have historically won U.S. Senate races in Arkansas by significant margins, with Cotton defeating his 2020 opponent by 33 points.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Democrat Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner's remarks on preferring illegal immigrant workers over Americans have invited backlash in Arkansas.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

September 19, 2026
Bonkers Britain
News
Religion

Church of England Withdraws Interfaith Award Given to Pro-Bin Laden Imam on 9/11 Anniversary.

The Church of England has rescinded an interfaith honor given to an Islamic cleric who once praised Osama Bin Laden following widespread backlash.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The female Archbishop of Canterbury has rescinded an interfaith award for an Islamic cleric who praised Osama bin Laden. 
📺 DETAIL: On the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Archbishop of Canterbury Dame Sarah Mullally, the senior bishop of the Church of England and symbolic head of the global Anglican Communion, gave Imam Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi the Hubert Walter Award for “reconciliation and interfaith cooperation.” Ashrafi was awarded for his supposed “longstanding support for religious minorities in Pakistan.” However, soon after the award was granted, it was revealed that Ashrafi had referred to Osama bin Laden as “Saifullah,” an honorific Islamic title meaning “the sword of God,” during Islamic protests against the decision to award author Salman Rushdie with a British knighthood back in 2007. Rushdie is under an Iranian fatwa for his novel, The Satanic Verses, which Muslims regard as blasphemous, and was seriously injured in an assassination attempt in 2022. In response to news of Rushdie’s knighthood at the time, the imam said: “If a blasphemer can be given the title ‘Sir’ by the West despite the fact he’s hurt the feelings of Muslims, then a mujahid [jihadist] who has been fighting for Islam against the Russians, Americans and British must be given the lofty title of Islam, Saifullah.” A spokesman for Ashrafi has since claimed that the imam’s comments were taken out of context. Since 2007, Imam Ashrafi has been chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council, an organization of Islamic scholars, which has allegedly supported extremist actions. “It is obscene, and almost beyond parody, that the Archbishop of Canterbury has awarded an Osama Bin Laden apologist an interfaith award on the anniversary of 9/11. This demonstrates appallingly poor judgment and is an insult to the victims of 9/11 and their families. Interfaith engagement must not mean overlooking support for extremism,” commented Alejandro Sanchez, spokesman for the National Secular Society. Lambeth Palace, the Archbishop’s seat in London, confirmed that the imam’s award was withdrawn on Thursday.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Why, oh why, is the Archbishop of Canterbury giving an award to a man who praised Osama Bin Laden just a few years after the Twin Towers?” said Reform UK leader Nigel Farage on GB News.
🎯 IMPACT: The incident has intensified scrutiny of the Church of England’s leadership and its naive approach to interfaith relations with Islam, with calls for a re-evaluation of its priorities. This represents another controversy for the Church of England. Dame Sarah, a pro-abortion woman, was appointed to the senior office earlier this year, sparking criticism that the English established church was straying from Christian teaching and causing many traditionalist Anglican churches to break away from it. The same month, it installed pro-diversity graffiti in one of its cathedrals, sparking criticism from Vice President JD Vance. “It is weird to me that these people don’t see the irony of honoring ‘marginalized communities’ by making a beautiful historical building really ugly,” said the Vice President at the time.

Image by Neil Turner for Lambeth Palace.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Church of England has rescinded an interfaith honor given to an Islamic cleric who once praised Osama Bin Laden following widespread backlash.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

September 19, 2026
Crime
News
UK

Afghan Migrant Sentenced for Raping Underage Teenagers.

An Afghan man who lured two 14-year-old girls to his flat, intoxicated them, and sexually assaulted them has been sentenced to 14 years in prison, but he may not be deported.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: An Afghan migrant in the United Kingdom has been imprisoned for a theoretical 14 years for raping two underage girls.
📺 DETAIL: Sultani Bakatash, a 29-year-old migrant from Afghanistan, was sentenced to 14 years in prison after being convicted of raping and sexually assaulting two 14-year-old girls in his flat in Bolton, England. Bakatash lured the girls through Snapchat, plied them with vodka, and sexually assaulted them while they were lapsed in and out of consciousness. The incident took place in December last year. One victim managed to escape and sought help from a neighbor, who alerted the police. Bakatash fled the scene but was arrested two days later. Bakatash was convicted of two counts of rape, one count of sexual assault, and one count of assault by penetration, after pleading not guilty. In addition to his supposed 14-year sentence, which he will be unlikely to serve in full, Bakatash was given another two years on license, and has been barred from contacting any child under 16 years old, albeit only for 20 years. Concerningly, he received Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), similar to permanent residency in the U.S., after arriving in the country back in 2021, meaning it could be difficult to deport him.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “You encouraged them to keep drinking… so they would become so drunk they would not be able to stop you having sex with them,” said Judge Kenderik Horne during the sentencing.
🎯 IMPACT: The assaults caused severe psychological harm to the victims. Bakatash could be deported, although no final decision has been made. However, the judge noted that Bakatash’s work with the British Army in Afghanistan could prevent this. This represents a recurring trend of Afghan migrants assaulting minors in Britain, with Afghans having per capita the highest rate of sexual offending of any nationality in the country.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is far from the only case of its kind. Last month, another Afghan migrant, Abdul Shinwari, was charged with the rape and sexual assault of a 17-year-old girl in Manchester, England. That same month, Abdul Khan, another Afghan, was sentenced for grooming and raping a 13-year-old girl. Khan, who is believed to be 28-years-old, falsely claimed to be a 14-year-old boy.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An Afghan man who lured two 14-year-old girls to his flat, intoxicated them, and sexually assaulted them has been sentenced to 14 years in prison, but he may not be deported.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

September 18, 2026
Immigration
Lawfare
News

DHS Chief Warns Immigration Lawyers Abusing the Asylum System to Expect Consequences.

The Department of Homeland Security has issued a letter to immigration attorneys as part of a broader effort to combat fraudulent asylum claims and prevent delays to deportations.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a warning to the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) regarding the legal consequences of enabling fraudulent asylum claims.
📺 DETAIL: The warning was issued to the immigration lawyers on Wednesday. “Asylum offers protection to aliens who have fled their countries due to persecution by the government on account of a protected ground… To be eligible for asylum, an alien must show that he is a ‘refugee’ as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A), meaning that he is unable or unwilling to return to his country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion,” warned DHS’ James Percival, who emphasized the discretionary nature of asylum. He criticized the misuse of asylum claims for economic reasons or to delay deportation, noting that many migrants from the Western Hemisphere do not meet the legal threshold for asylum. “Filing a frivolous asylum application generally renders an alien permanently ineligible for most forms of relief and other immigration benefits… The Department will vigorously pursue all available remedies against anyone engaging in this conduct,” he added in his letter to AILA, threatening fines for attorneys found guilty of enabling fraudulent claims.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We have been abundantly clear: If immigration attorneys commit fraud for their clients, the attorneys will be fined,” said James Percival, DHS General Counsel.
🎯 IMPACT: This warning signals a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s efforts to combat fraud in the immigration system. It also demonstrates that the administration is conscious of how the legal system can be weaponized by partisan and ideologically motivated lawyers to stall progress in enforcing U.S. immigration laws.
📺 FLASHBACK: Back in March, it was revealed that immigration attorneys had flooded the legal system with approximately 24,400 habeas claims amid the federal government’s crackdown on illegal immigration. While the U.S. Constitution provides the writ of habeas to prevent American citizens from being detained without justification, it has been weaponized to force bond hearings for illegal immigrants detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The Supreme Court was set to clarify the constitutionality of bond hearings for non-citizens, but this was derailed by Democrat New York Governor Kathy Hochul after she pardoned an illegal migrant convicted of assault earlier this month.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Homeland Security has issued a letter to immigration attorneys as part of a broader effort to combat fraudulent asylum claims and prevent delays to deportations.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad