Tuesday, October 21, 2025
ukraine

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Confusion As UK SecDef Suggests Ukraine Troop Deployment, But Prime Minister Disagrees.

The newly minted British Secretary of State for Defence, Grant Shapps, appeared to announce an escalation in the proxy war against Russia on Saturday, telling the Telegraph newspaper that British troops could be deployed in Ukraine. His announcement followed a visit with Ukrainian leaders including President Zelensky.

The news, naturally, rankled Russian leaders with Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Dmitry Medvedev stating: “(This will) turn their instructors into a legal target for our armed forces … understanding perfectly well that they will be ruthlessly destroyed. And not as mercenaries, but namely as British NATO specialists.”

Shapps – who has no military experience and is in fact a former software salesman – also floated the idea of using the British navy to defend commercial vessels from Russian attacks in the Black Sea.

“Particularly in the west of the country, I think the opportunity now is to bring more things ‘in country’ – not just training, but also we’re seeing BAE [the UK defence firm], for example, move into manufacturing in country, for example,” explained Shapps.

But his boss, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, poured cold water on his plans on Sunday, explaining: “What the defence secretary was saying was that it might well be possible one day in the future for us to do some of that training in Ukraine. But that’s something for the long term, not the here and now. There are no British soldiers that will be sent to fight in the current conflict.”

The almost escalation and swift row back has caused embarrassment for the UK government just as the governing Conservative Party begins its annual conference, this year in Manchester.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Socialized UK Health Service Determined Southport Killer Was Not Dangerous Days Before Stabbing Spree.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An official inquiry into the stabbing spree targeting young girls in Southport, England, by Axel Rudakubana has found that he was assessed as posing no risk to others in a mental health evaluation by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just six days before his attack.

WHO WAS INVOLVED: Axel Rudakubana, Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) case manager Kathryn Morris, clinical lead Dr. Vicky Killen, psychiatrists Dr. Lakshmi Ramasubramanian and Dr. Anthony Molyneux, counsel Nicholas Moss KC, and Rudakubana’s victims.

WHEN & WHERE: Risk assessment and discharge on July 23, 2024, at Alder Hey CAMHS; attack on July 29, 2024, in Southport; inquiry testimony on October 20, 2025, at Liverpool Town Hall.

KEY QUOTE: “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.” – Dr Anthony Molyneux.

IMPACT: Revelations expose critical lapses in mental health oversight and information sharing, fueling calls for systemic reforms in child services to prevent future tragedies amid Rudakubana’s history of violence and manipulation.

IN FULL

A public inquiry has revealed serious failings by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just days before Axel Rudakubana, carried out a deadly knife attack that killed three young girls and injured several others in Southport, England. The then-17-year-old was discharged by Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) on July 23, 2024, following a risk assessment that incorrectly concluded he posed no threat to others. This decision was made despite records noting incidents of aggression, including verbal threats toward his father—an African asylum seeker—and smashing a phone during a call.

Only six days later, on July 29, Rudakubana stormed a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop and fatally stabbed three girls: seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, six-year-old Bebe King, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar. He also attempted to kill ten other children and wounded two adults. The attack shocked the nation and led to widespread anti-mass migration demonstrations and riots, which prompted a draconian crackdown by the British authorities.

At Monday’s hearing at Liverpool Town Hall, Nicholas Moss KC confronted CAMHS clinical lead Dr Vicky Killen, who admitted the determination that Rudakubana was not dangerous was unacceptable. “There was risk on the record and it should have been recorded,” she said, conceding the assessment fell “very far” short of expected standards.

Other medical professionals also raised concerns about Rudakubana’s history. Psychiatrist Dr Lakshmi Ramasubramanian recounted a troubling phone consultation in 2021, where she said Rudakubana described symptoms “as if he had rehearsed it from a book” to obtain medication. She described his behaviour as “demanding, argumentative,” and said he tried to “manipulate” the situation. She eventually stopped treatment after his migrant father acted in an “intimidating” and “disrespectful” manner, something she said had never happened in her career.

Dr Anthony Molyneux, who began treating Rudakubana in July 2022, assessed him as a “minimal” risk. He knew of a school knife incident but was unaware of more serious events, including a 2019 assault on a pupil with a hockey stick and online searches for terrorism-related content. Molyneux said full record reviews were “impossible” saying, “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

London Mayor Khan Accused of Muslim Rape Gang Cover-Up.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A recent investigation by several British media outlets has uncovered allegations of a “cover-up” by London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan regarding Muslim grooming gangs, accusing him of overlooking evidence of organized sexual exploitation in the city.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mayor Khan, Conservative Party Assembly Member Susan Hall, Reform Party Member of Parliament (MP) Lee Anderson, Metropolitan Police Chief Sir Mark Rowley, and convicted predators Naeem Ahmed, Nabeel Ahmed, and Hassan Raza.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The allegations cover incidents in London from 2013 to 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is real, credible evidence that grooming gangs exist in London, and for the Mayor to have potentially turned a blind eye is utterly shameful” – Lee Anderson MP.

🎯IMPACT: The findings have heightened demands for a high-powered national inquiry into grooming gangs under Sir Keir Starmer’s Government, amplified by a victim’s resignation from a Home Office panel over claims of victims’ voices are being suppressed.

IN FULL

London’s Muslim Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, of the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, is facing growing scrutiny after multiple investigations revealed evidence of Muslim grooming gangs operating in the capital. Critics say have been downplayed or ignored for years in the capital—which is unusual in being a major urban center with a large Muslim population but no major rape gang revelations, as in cities such as Rotherham and Rochdale.

A joint investigation by several British media outlets uncovered serious cases of child sexual exploitation in London boroughs including Redbridge, Newham, and Stratford, with claims that officials failed to act on credible intelligence. Among the most serious incidents are the 2013 convictions of Naeem Ahmed, Nabeel Ahmed, and Hassan Raza in Redbridge. Prosecutors said the three men targeted a vulnerable woman, who was befriended and then raped and sexually assaulted by the group. A detective in the case said, “Nabeel Ahmed chose this woman because she was vulnerable. Having befriended her… he instead took her to his friends and they all sexually abused her.”

In 2017, four teenage girls aged between 13 and 15 reported being groomed near a McDonald’s in Stratford. They said they were moved between locations and sexually assaulted by multiple men. A subsequent investigation identified 30 potential victims and led to six arrests, but ultimately no charges were filed. At the time, police admitted the scale of the abuse “could be wider than initially thought.”

These cases have reignited accusations that authorities, including the Mayor’s office, have been reluctant to confront the issue publicly. Notably, Mayor Khan repeatedly claimed he did not understand what “grooming gangs” are under questioning at the London Assembly earlier this year.

Lee Anderson, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, commented, “There is real, credible evidence that grooming gangs exist in London, and for the Mayor to have potentially turned a blind eye is utterly shameful.”

London’s Metropolitan Police, under Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, previously stated there were no ongoing grooming gang investigations in the British capital, but recently reversed that position and claimed that cases are being pursued.

Calls are mounting for a national inquiry that includes the capital, amid growing public concern that grooming gang crimes have been systematically underreported across the country.

Image by East London Mosque.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Republicans Demand Investigation Into ‘No Kings’ Speaker Who Wants ICE Agents ‘Shot and Wiped Out.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A speaker at a “No Kings” rally in Chicago was recorded calling for the murder of federal immigration agents, sparking calls for investigation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The unnamed protester, City Colleges of Chicago staff, ICE agents, and Illinois Rep. Mary Miller.

📍WHEN & WHERE: At a “No Kings” rally in Chicago, Illinois. The video was shared widely on social media shortly after the event.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out.” – No Kings rally speaker

🎯IMPACT: The Department of Justice (DOJ) is pledging accountability for threats against law enforcement.

IN FULL

Republicans are demanding an investigation into a man filmed urging people to murder U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at a “No Kings” rally in Chicago, Illinois. In the footage, the speaker declares, “You gotta grab a gun, we gotta turn around the guns on this fascist system. These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out. The same machinery that’s on full display right there has to get wiped out.”

Illinois Republican Rep. Mary Miller condemned the statements on X, describing them as “sickening” and demanding an investigation into the unnamed speaker, said to be a member of staff at a Chicago college. “A staff member at Wilbur Wright College is calling for ICE agents to get ‘shot’ and ‘wiped out.’ This is a criminal threat that should be investigated,” she wrote, tagging the Department of Justice (DOJ).

A DOJ spokesman said, “The Department is actively tracking these targeted assaults against our law enforcement and will hold offenders accountable to the fullest extent of the law.”

The No Kings speech follows a pattern of increasing threats to ICE agents, including a sniper attack in Texas. The National Pulse reported earlier on Monday on an illegal immigrant being arrested for allegedly offering $10,000 bounties to kill ICE agents on TikTok.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Expanding Immigration Raids to San Francisco.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is expanding its crackdown on sanctuary cities, with San Francisco, California, a new target for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and California Governor Gavin Newsom (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on October 20, 2025, during a press conference in Sarasota, Florida.

💬KEY QUOTE: “San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago it went wrong, it went woke.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: San Francisco joins other cities like Portland, Oregon, and Chicago, Illinois, in facing federal operations aimed at removing illegal immigrant criminals.

IN FULL

The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on sanctuary cities, designating San Francisco, California, as a key target for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revealed the decision at a press conference in Sarasota, Florida, on Monday.

“We continue to have targeted operations in many, many cities, but also very focused on those where challenges are still remaining, such as Portland, Chicago, we’re in Memphis as well, we’re going to San Francisco at the direction of the president as well,” Noem declared.

President Donald J. Trump weighed in during an interview, stating, “San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago it went wrong, it went woke. We’re going to San Francisco and we’re going to make it great.”

Democrat California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has strenuously opposed Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration law in line with his 2024 election mandate, complained on X, “Nobody wants you here. You will ruin one of America’s greatest cities.”

San Francisco adopted its sanctuary status in 1989 through the “City and County of Refuge” Ordinance, which bars local police from assisting ICE in matters involving illegal immigrant criminals.

In Democrat-run cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles, federal officers have encountered fierce anti-ICE demonstrations and riots. Trump has tapped the National Guard and U.S. Marines in response to such disturbances before, but court challenges brought by Democrats such as Newsom and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker have at times delayed federal actions.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Notorious Antifa Site Announces Shutdown, Cites Fear of Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A major Antifa news site has annouced it will be shutting down due to pressure from the Trump administration, following the desgination of Antifa as a terrorist group.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The It’s Going Down (IGD) website, Antifa, the Trump administration, and journalist Andy Ngo.

📍WHEN & WHERE: It’s Going Down annouced the shutting down of the site on October 18.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Over the years, ‘It’s Going Down’ has posted numerous claims of responsibility for domestic terrorist attacks, including an attempt by an Antifa militant to derail a train, which led to the website being mentioned in a federal criminal complaint. The website has also posted manuals on carrying out crimes and evading detection for terrorist attacks.” – Andy Ngo.

🎯IMPACT: The closure comes after the Trump administration began to seriously investigate the leftist terror group.

IN FULL

A prominent far-left Antifa website known for promoting anarchist ideologies has shut down, citing increasing federal pressure under the Trump administration. The site, It’s Going Down (IGD), announced its closure in a public statement on October 18, claiming it could no longer operate in what it described as a “dire” political climate. “The current administration is attempting to consolidate extreme authoritarian power,” the site’s extremist operators claimed.

The move follows the Trump administration’s crackdown on domestic extremist groups, particularly those associated with Antifa, including President Donald J. Trump formally designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. The executive order, issued on September 22, characterized Antifa as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise” that seeks to overthrow the U.S. government and law enforcement institutions.

The administration followed up with National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, directing federal agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle left-wing extremist operations, including financial networks and affiliated nonprofit groups.

IGD, which has operated for years, gained notoriety for publishing content sympathetic to anarchist extremist groups and so-called direct action campaigns. It has previously been cited by federal authorities in connection with riots, vandalism, and sabotage. In a 2020 case, the Department of Justice (DOJ) referenced the site in a criminal complaint related to an attempt to derail a train in Washington state.

Andy Ngo, a journlaist who has covered Antifa extremists extensively,  commented on the closure saying, “Over the years, ‘It’s Going Down’ has posted numerous claims of responsibility for domestic terrorist attacks, including an attempt by an Antifa militant to derail a train, which led to the website being mentioned in a federal criminal complaint. The website has also posted manuals on carrying out crimes and evading detection for terrorist attacks.”

The Trump administration’s campaign against far-left extremism escalated in October when a federal grand jury indicted two alleged Antifa members for an armed attack on a federal immigration facility in Texas. The suspects were charged with terrorism-related offenses, including attempted murder of federal officers and providing material support for terrorism. The incident marked the first time alleged Antifa affiliates have been formally charged as domestic terrorists.

On October 16, the Treasury Department also instructed banks and financial institutions to begin monitoring transactions and donations linked to Antifa and other organizations flagged under the new domestic terrorism directive.

In a related development, Rutgers University professor Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, announced he would be leaving the United States. Bray, a known defender of Antifa tactics, said he could no longer safely continue his work in the current political climate.

Image by Oompje.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New Charges Filed Against Adult Suspects in Edward ‘Big Balls’ Coristine Assault.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Two suspects were charged with assaulting Ethan Levine before attacking former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward “Big Balls” Coristine on August 3.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lawrence Cotton Powell (19), Anthony Taylor (18), Edward Coristine, Ethan Levine, and other unidentified suspects.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incidents occurred on Swan Street Northwest, Washington, DC, within minutes of each other on August 3,  with the charges announced on Monday, October 20.

💬KEY QUOTE: “So after a felony of attempted robbery, conviction after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with CSOSA, the judges say, do better, and they let him go. And guess what? Within 10 days, he’s at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Coristine.” – U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights repeated failures in the justice system to hold offenders accountable, leading to further crimes.

IN FULL

Two addidtional suspects in the August 3 attack on former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward “Big Balls” Coristine were charged on Monday for a second criminal assault that occured just minutes prior. Lawrence Cotton Powell, aged 19, and Anthony Taylor, aged 18, have been charged as adults for violently attacking and robbing Ethan Levine before joing a group of around 10 individuals who subsequenly assaulted Coristine as he protected a young woman from the group.

“Today, we are announcing that Lawrence Cotton Powell, who is 19 years of age, along with Anthony Taylor, who is 18 years of age, are now charged with assaulting [Ethan] Levine,”  U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro announced, continuing: “Then, after the robbery and assault of Ethan Levine, they walked in the direction of where another crime occurred. Within minutes, you have heard of this crime. Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old DOGE person who was working in the administration was walking a young woman to her car when he was approached in the 1400 block of Swan Street Northwest.”

“Approximately 10 suspects approached him, and as they did, he pushed the young woman into the car. And he was protecting her from the group, before he was then attacked by multiple suspects who then punched him repeatedly, causing significant injuries to him,” she added.

Pirro also noted that Powell has an extensive prior criminal history, criticizing lenient sentences issued by several judges for allowing him to dodge prison time. “So after a felony of attempted robbery, conviction after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with CSOSA, the judges say, do better, and they let him go. And guess what? Within 10 days, he’s at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Coristine,” she revealed.

The National Pulse reported last week that Washington, D.C. Superior Court Judge Kendra Biggs sentenced two 15-year-olds to probation and no jail time for their roles in the attack on Coristine, claiming that her role is to “rehabilitate,” not punish.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Appeals Court Rules Trump CAN Send National Guard Into Portland.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled two to one to allow President Donald J. Trump to deploy Oregon National Guard troops into Portland, overturning a lower court’s ruling blocking the action.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Oregon Democrat officials, protesters, and a three-judge appellate panel including Judges Ryan Nelson, Bridget Bade, and Susan Graber.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Monday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, covering Portland, Oregon.

💬KEY QUOTE: “After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” — 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

🎯IMPACT: The decision allows the Trump administration to move forward with National Guard deployment while legal challenges continue.

IN FULL

A federal appeals court cleared the way on Monday for President Donald J. Trump to move forward with deploying Oregon National Guard troops into Portland, Oregon, to protect federal facilities and immigration agents, overturning a lower court’s decision that temporarily blocked the action. The three-judge 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled two to one to lift an October 5 restraining order issued by District Court Judge Karin Immergut blocking the deployment.

“After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,” the majority, comprised of Judges Ryan Nelson and Bridget Bade, both Trump appointees, wrote in the ruling. Judge Susan Graber, appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton, dissented.

The decision comes amid ongoing clashes between far-left rioters and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Portland. Notably, Democrat governrment officials Oregon claim the deployment is unnecessary, arguing the publicly documented violent riots are exaggerated.

President Trump’s efforts to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities that have refused to police the violent anti-ICE demonstrations have been frustrated by several far-left judges, though the administration has seen a degree of success overturning the restraining orders at the appellate level. A separate District Court order barring President Trump’s deployment of National Guard to Chicago, Illinois was partially lifted by the 7th Circuit on Saturday—allowing the troops to remain stationed at a nearby Army Reserve base.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Announces Australia Pact Countering China’s Rare Earth Restrictions.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The United States and Australia signed a framework to secure critical minerals and rare earths supply chains for defense and advanced technologies.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In about a year from now we’ll have so much critical mineral and rare earth that you won’t know what to do with them.” — President Trump

🎯IMPACT: The agreement aims to bolster industrial resilience and security in both nations, while countering China’s unprecedented export restrrictions on its rare earth minerals.

IN FULL

The United States and Australia have formalized a framework to secure critical minerals and rare earths supply chains essential for defense and advanced technologies. The agreement—aimed at decoupling the two countries from reliance on China—was signed by President Donald J. Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Washington, D.C. on Monday.

“In about a year from now we’ll have so much critical mineral and rare earth that you won’t know what to do with them,” Trump said during the signing, with Albanese declaring: “We are great friends and we’re great allies.”

According to the framework, the United States and Australia are committing to “intensifying their cooperative efforts to accelerate the secure supply of critical minerals and rare earths necessary to support manufacturing of defense and advanced technologies and their respective industrial bases.” To accomplish this goal, both countries agreed to “mobilize government and private sector support including for capital and operational expenditures via guarantees, loans, or equity; finalization of offtake arrangements; insurance; or regulatory facilitation.”

President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese also announced that their governmens will each commit at least $1 billion in financing for projects within their respective countries to strengthen supply chains. The investment will be promoted by a jointly managed Mining, Minerals and Metals Investment Ministerial.

Notably, the U.S. Export-Import Bank will issue seven Letters of Interest for more than $2.2 billion in financing, which will enable up to $5 billion in total investment. Additionally, the U.S. Department of War is set to fund the construction of a 100 metric tons-per-year advanced gallium refinery in Western Australia, furthering efforts toward critical mineral independence.

Australia, as part of the agreement, committed to purchasing $1.2 billion in U.S.-made unmanned underwater vehicles and $2.6 billion in Apache helicopters. The nation will also contribute $1 billion to the U.S. submarine industrial base, with another $1 billion expected by year’s end.

The move comes on the heels of a radically restrictive export control policy instituted earlier this month by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on China’s large reserves of rare earth minerals. China, which dominates the global supply of rare earths, stated that the measures are necessary to “safeguard national security and interests.” Under the new rules, foreign exporters of products containing rare earths sourced from China must obtain licenses from Beijing’s commerce ministry. Licenses for products with “military use” will largely be denied, according to Chinese authorities.

In response to the CPP’s export controls, President Trump announced he intends to impose a new 100 percent tariff on Chinese imports. However, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s dismissal of Li Chenggang—one of the Chinese Communist Party’s top trade negotiators—after U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent publicy derided Li as “unhinged” suggests Beijing could be seeking an off ramp from the tade war ahead of President Trump’s meeing with Xi later this month.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Grinning Mamdani Poses for Photo With Unindicted WTC Bombing Co-Conspirator.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Democrat New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani shared a photo with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, Imam Siraj Wahhaj, and terrorist Omar Abdel Rahman.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 2025 at Masjid At-Taqwa in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If we were united and strong, we’d elect our own emir [leader] and give allegiance to him. … Take my word, if 6-8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us.” — Imam Siraj Wahhaj

🎯IMPACT: The photo has renewed scurtiny regarding the radical sect of Islam Mamdani follows, his radical, far-left political ideology, and his personal association with violent Islamists.

IN FULL

Democrat New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani shared a photo on social media on Saturday in which he appears with radical Islamist Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In the post, Mamdani praised Wahhaj as one of America’s foremost Muslim religious scholars and a local Brooklyn community leader.

“Today at Masjid At-Taqwa, I had the pleasure of meeting with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, one of the nation’s foremost Muslim leaders and a pillar of the Bed-Stuy community for nearly half a century,” wrote the Uganda-born Democratic Socialist, who is joyfully smiling in the photo.

Wahhaj previously defended Omar Abdel Rahman, the notorious radical “blind sheikh” cleric who was convicted along with nine others of plotting the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. According to recordings obtained by federal investigators, Rahman went on to encouraged further violence against targets in New York and New Jersey.

Before his 2017 death in federal prison, Rahman led Al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya, an Egyptian miliant Islamist group desigated as a terrorist organization by the United Kingdom and the European Union (EU). The groups’s terrorist designation in the United States was dropped by the former Biden government in 2022.

In addition, Wahhaj has drawn public scrutiny for a series of controversial statements including, a 2017 sermon on jihad, declaring, “I pray one day Allah will bless us to raise an army, and I’m serious about this. We were very close, recently. We had made intention to raise an army of 10,000 men in New York City.” In 1992, he argued, “If we were united and strong, we’d elect our own emir [leader] and give allegiance to him… Take my word, if six to eight million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us.”

Speaking on the jihad in Afghanistan in Toronto, Canada, in 1991, Wahhaj stated: “Those who struggle for Allah, it doesn’t matter what kind of weapons [you use], I’m telling you it doesn’t matter! You don’t need nuclear weapons or even guns! If you have faith in Allah and a knife! If Allah wants you to win, you will win! Because Allah is the only one who fights. And when his hand is over your hand, whoever is at war against my friends, I declare war on them…. The Americans are not your friends … The Canadians are not your friends … The Europeans are not your friends. Your friend is Allah.”

Currrent polling shows Mamdani, himself a follower of the radical Twelver sect of Shia Islam, leading in the mayoral race over his opponents, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) who is running as an Independent candidate and Republican Curtis Sliwa.

Image via @ZohranKMamdani.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

SCOTUS to Rule on Disarming Chronic Potheads.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court announced it will examine the constitutionality of a federal law prohibiting regular marijuana users from owning firearms, following an appeal by the Trump administration to reinstate felony charges against a Texas gunowner who acknowledged being a regular user of the drug.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ali Danial Hemani, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under President Donald J. Trump, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court justices.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision to take the case was announced on October 20, 2025, originating from a 2023 indictment in Texas.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling could redefine Second Amendment protections for millions of marijuana users amid expanding state legalization, building on the 2022 Bruen decision and sparking further challenges to gun restrictions.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to review whether habitual marijuana consumers can be barred from firearm possession under federal law, marking the latest high-profile gun rights dispute since the court’s 2022 Bruen decision expanding Second Amendment protections. The Trump administration petitioned the justices to overturn a lower court’s dismissal of charges against Texas resident Ali Danial Hemani, who faced felony prosecution for keeping a gun at home despite admitting to routine cannabis use.

Hemani’s case stems from a 2023 Federal Bureau of Investigaion (FBI) raid on his residence, prompted by suspicions of ties to Iranian entities, where agents discovered a 9mm pistol, marijuana, and cocaine. Prosecutors secured a conviction based on a gun possession charge tied to Hemani’s unlawful drug use. However, the charge was subsequently thrown out by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds the prosecution violated the Supreme Court’s Bruen framework which the appellete panel ruled permitted enforcement solely for individuals intoxicated while armed.

Department of Justice (DOJ) attoneys, in their appeal of the 5th Circuit ruling argue that the drug-user restriction is a reasonable safeguard against public hazards posed by impaired owners. Notably a number of states, like Virginia, have laws against open and concealed carry while intoxicated. Virgina also prohibits carrying a concealed handgun while drinking at a bar or restaurant, and consuming alcohol while carrying a firearm at any private event where special licenses permit drinking.

Lawyers representing Hemani maintain that the statute endangers countless citizens with inadvertent breaches, citing federal data showing 20 percent of Americans have experimented with marijuana, even as roughly half the states permit recreational use—though it remains a controlled substance federally.

Oral arguments are anticipated to be held early next year, with a final opinion expected by summer’s end.

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.