Wednesday, June 10, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

READ: Biden Indulged in 10 Minute Rant About Country Clubs and Burnt Penises During Special Counsel Testimony.

President Joe Biden delivered a long and rambling response when pressed by Department of Justice special counsel Robert Hur regarding document retention during the final days of the Obama government. The 81-year-old Biden, ignoring Hur’s question, went on a nearly 10-minute rant discussing country clubs, interview practices of almost 60 years ago, and how a man he knew lost his genitals in a fire.

Hur asked Biden: “So now let’s talk about the Naval Observatory. So you’ve been living there for eight years. So at the end of your vice presidency, what kinds of papers or documents or files were at the Naval Observatory as you were preparing to leave and move out?”

The President began to respond substantively but quickly spiraled into a bizarre and unhinged tangent comparable to the iconic Simpsons scene where Homer Simpson’s father indulges himself in a winding story that ends up nowhere.

Read it for yourself:

PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, if you’re talking about anything that was a substantive matter, classified or otherwise — you know, the fight in the Judiciary Committee over whether or not — I was the guy who wrote the Violence Against Women Act. It was — really meant a lot to me. And so they might find stuff on the Violence Against Women Act in one section of a drawer or in the shelves of the library or of the Naval Observatory.

Or issues, you know, relating to — I know it’s gonna sound strange to you guys, but agriculture is a $4 billion industry, agriculture is a $4 billion industry in Delaware and the Delmarva peninsula, and so — or, you know, I’d have a lot of political things that — I, I don’t know where they were, but I know I had material that — where I, you know — like, there’s a whole, whole bunch of stuff around about how -~ what made me run for President in the first place, and about how things were — you know, I mean, for example, I, I was a — I got a job with a — I didn’t take law school very seriously, but I won the International Tort Competition. I was in — matter of fact, the first time in tort class, we had a really difficult professor. I mean, very well-known, Professor at Syracuse, and he called on me to — you know how they do in law school, discuss a case, you know, in your first torts class. And I had never read the case, and I stood up and I spoke for 10 minutes. The whole class stood up, started clapping.

The transcript notes there was laughter among those in the interview at this point.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And he said, Mr. Biden, you’ll be a hell of a trial lawyer. He said, not a single thing you — had to do with that.

Again, the transcript denotes laughter.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And — but at any rate, so — but in law school, I got in law school, and I got, believe it or not, a job offer from some prestigious law firms. I was not sure where I wanted to go, out west and where — I wanted to move to Idaho, I thought, and so I was going to go out and interview with Boise Cascade. That’s all I’d really — and — but I took a job with the best-known trial firm in Delaware in mostly civil defense issues. And, and so — and I remember a guy named [REDACTED] (phonetic), a brilliant guy that went to Amherst and Harvard and said — when he was interviewing me said, in those days, you had to — today you would be killed. You had to put your photograph in the upper right-hand corner when you’re applying for a job. And he looked at me and said, I assume you’re expecting to be hired on your looks.

Once again, the transcript denotes laughter.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I said — and I thought the job was over, and I said, I said, well, it would improve the look of your firm.

Those present respond with laughter again, according to the transcript.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: I mean, I was just — So anyway, to make a long story short, they ended up offering me a job. And in Delaware, it has -~- used to have the lowest pass rate in the country because we’re not big on encouraging lawyers to come and play in Delaware. It’s a very tight bar. And, and so what happened was you take the bar, you graduate, and you have to clerk for somebody for six months. (Indiscernible 0:11:51.6). And they don’t give the bar exam until the middle of September. You don’t get your results to your — for the bar exam until January. And, and so — I — but I got hired in the meantime by this firm appropriately named Prickett, Ward, Burt Sanders. And, and to make a long story not quite so long, I was sitting second chair with the, with the, with the guy who ran the firm, Prickett, Mr. Prickett, and there was a young man who we were representing, [REDACTED] (phonetic) getting — and (indiscernible 0:12:34.3) construction company, you know, I had to turn those — we have more oil refineries than any place other than in Houston in Delaware and Pennsylvania, (indiscernible 0:12:43.6) up in that area.

And this poor kid is down a hundred-foot vessel, chimney, scraping the hydrogen bubbles off of the inside. They were made to shut the plant down once every — whatever, about eight months or six months or a year, whatever it is. And he was wearing the wrong pants, wrong jeans, and he -~- a spark caught fire and got caught in the containment vessel and he lost part of his penis and one of his testicles and he was 23 years old.

And I sat through the -~ his presentation with the, with the senior, and we had in Delaware, which is – the Dupont family had no influence of course – contributory negligence. If you were slightly contributory negligence, you were out.

And so the senior partner turned to me and said, write a memo for tomorrow, we’re going to make a motion to dismiss after presenting this case. So I did. I wrote this memo. And son of a bitch, it prevailed. And I looked over at that kid and his wife home with two little kids, and I thought son of a bitch, I’m in the wrong business, I’m not made for this.

It is at this point that Biden transitions to discussing the admission practices of private country clubs in Delaware, before explaining his decision to become a public defender.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I — there was a famous club called the Wilmington Club — no blacks, Catholics are allowed — have been allowed to be members. The DuPont family name. And we went to a place called the Wilmington Club, and he thought he was doing — he said, take the lunch at Wilmington. I said — the only time I ever lied that I can remember looking somebody in the eye, and I mean sincerely, I said, oh, my dad’s coming in today, I was going to see -~ okay. He didn’t give a damn where I went. I walked across and walked through to the second — the basement on a public building and walked in with a guy named Frank and I said I want a job as a public defender. He said, don’t you work for Prickett. He said, he said, are you okay, like what the hell’s the matter with you. I quit and became a public defender.

The process of that was that’s what got me — I had been involved in the civil rights movement. That got me deeply involved in trying to reform the Democratic Party, which was a southern Democratic Party. We were a slave state by law. We were one of the border states so we couldn’t figure — anyway, but the Democratic Party was a conservative party in Delaware. The DuPont family ran the Republican Party, but they were like Rockefeller Republicans at the time. And so I got involved with a group of people trying to reform the Democratic Party.

At this point Biden informed Hur his story was meant to illustrate the amount of materials he has kept over the years.

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And the whole point of telling you all this is I had a lot of material that I kept notes on and, and when that — where as I was taking on the Democratic Party. And they came to me and asked me to — this group, this new Democratic coalition — I had, in the meantime, it’s two years down the road, I was 26 years old, 27. And I went to work part time for a criminal defense firm mainly, a real estate — there were five people. And so I was no longer a public defender because I couldn’t be a public defender and work for that firm.

President Biden’s moment of clarity does not last however, and he again plunges into a lengthy rant — several times to “make a long story short.”

PRESIDENT BIDEN: And one thing led to another and I joined this group to try to reform the party. And they came to me about and I was making the case we’ve just got to get more candidates to run, to — we’re not, we’re not represented. And the southern part of the state of Delaware will talk at you like this, for real, you go down — you think I’m joking, I’m not joking. “Damn, boy, I don’t agree with a damn thing you say,” but he said, “I know where you stand, know where you stand.” That’s how they talk. And it was solidly democrat, southern democrat. We were the only state in the nation occupied by the military for 10 months with drawn bayonets at every corner when Dr. King was assassinated, and that’s really what got me going. Long story, and I’ll end, because it relates to maybe some of the other things you may ask about, is that I had a lot of material that I did recent. When you’re the youngest guy in the room, you get to turn the lights on and off. And so I, I amassed a lot of material making the case why the party had to change and, and they — and it ended up that about 10 months in, the group from the area where I lived came to me and said they wanted me to run for the state senate. I said, no, no, no, I can’t do that. I just — I’m thinking of starting my own law firm and it’s going to — no, I can’t do that. And because they meet in Dover and dah, dah, dah.

And then next thing that happened was I came back about three weeks later. They said we want — to the office I was in at the time. I had now started my own office. And I didn’t realize no one my age ever started his own law firm. I hired two lawyers. I had no freaking money. But I hired them and paid them more than I was going to make, and I started this firm. And there — I remember standing looking out over the public and they said how about running for the county council. I said, no, no, I can’t go down. He said, they meet right across the street there only twice a week at night. You can do this. So to make a long story short, I ended up doing it. But I wanted to be sure that I was going to lose because — so I ran ina district that no one’s ever won, a Democrat had never won.

And I won it.

And next thing you know, I’m in a tough position.

My generic point was there was a lot of material that I had amassed that I wanted to save. I probably still have it somewhere. And so that stuff would travel wherever the hell

I was —

Hur, at this point, finally interrupts Biden. The special counsel steered the conversation back to the relevant question of document retention.

“Do you recall having these types of things with you at the Naval Observatory and this was part of the stuff you were trying to move out?” Hur asked the President.

“No. I had most of it at my house in that office,” Biden finally answered.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Conor McGregor Demands Immediate Ban on Third World Immigration After Attempted Beheading.

UFC star Conor McGregor has demanded an end to Third World immigration and called for the deportation of illegal immigrants after a Sudanese asylum seeker was charged with attempted murder in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Former two-weight world mixed martial arts champion Conor McGregor called for an immediate end to Third World immigration and the mass deportation of all illegal immigrants after a Sudanese refugee allegedly attempted to behead a man in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday evening, Hadi Alodid allegedly attempted to behead a local man, Stephen Ogilvie, with a kitchen knife. Alodid entered Northern Ireland, which is part of the United Kingdom, via the open border with the Republic of Ireland, in the European Union, having previously flown to Dublin from Paris, France. The British authorities granted him leave to remain after he claimed asylum, despite the fact that he had passed through at least two safe European countries. Following the attack, violent protests erupted across Belfast, with houses believed to be hosting migrants, public transportation, and local businesses set on fire. In response to Alodid’s alleged attack, UFC star Conor McGregor called for an end to immigration from Third World countries, as well as the deportation of all illegal immigrants on X (formerly Twitter). The former featherweight and lightweight champion called on the Irish government to “CLOSE THE BORDERS” and “Ban all immigration from the 3rd world IMMEDIATELY!” McGregor further encouraged politicians to “Help them [migrants] from where they are.” McGregor has previously voiced concerns that Ireland risks “losing its Irishness” due to the “illegal immigration racket.”
💬 KEY QUOTE:CLOSE THE BORDERS. Enter IPAS centres [residential facilities in the Republic of Ireland that provide temporary housing, meals, and support services to asylum seekers] militarily and remove all illegal entrants from this island. Inviting and financing mentally deranged people from the 3rd world is a hard no. Get them out. Stop them coming. We say no to this.” – Conor McGregor
🎯 IMPACT: McGregor’s comments reflect widespread public anger at the incident and the response of the political class to the attempted beheading. His comments are likely to draw more attention to the incident and influence public opinion.

Image by Andrius Petrucenia.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

UFC star Conor McGregor has demanded an end to Third World immigration and called for the deportation of illegal immigrants after a Sudanese asylum seeker was charged with attempted murder in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Somali World Cup Referee Denied Entry to U.S. Had Links to Suspected Terrorists.

A Somali referee selected for the 2026 FIFA World Cup was denied entry into the United States after federal authorities linked him to suspected members of terrorist organizations.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Somali referee Omar Artan, selected to officiate at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, was denied entry into the United States after Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials discovered information linking him to suspected members of terrorist organizations. Artan was stopped at Miami International Airport after arriving from Istanbul, Turkey, and subsequently deemed inadmissible under U.S. immigration law.
📺 DETAIL: The Trump administration said CBP officers discovered “derogatory information” during an inspection that made Artan ineligible for entry, citing national security concerns. FIFA confirmed that Artan will no longer participate in referee training or officiate matches after being informed by U.S. authorities that his immigration status would not be changed. The governing body noted that host governments ultimately determine visa approvals and entry decisions for international events. CBP stated that all travelers, including athletes and officials, are subject to federal screening and admissibility reviews.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This individual was seeking admission to the United States. Upon further inspection by CBP, derogatory information, including association with suspected members of terror organizations, was discovered making the traveler ineligible for admission to the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)… President Trump’s administration will not allow any security threat to enter our country – full stop.” – Trump administration statement
🎯 IMPACT: The decision underscores the Trump administration’s commitment to strict immigration enforcement, particularly ahead of major international events hosted in the U.S.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Somali referee selected for the 2026 FIFA World Cup was denied entry into the United States after federal authorities linked him to suspected members of terrorist organizations.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Inflation Hits Three-Year High, Trump Predicts It Will Drop ‘Like a Rock’ After Iran War.

Inflation in the United States has surged to its highest level in three years, driven by rising energy costs created by the Iran war and disruptions to global supply chains.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Inflation in the United States hit a three-year high in May, reaching over four percent. However, President Donald J. Trump told reporters “I love the inflation” on Wednesday, revealing that the U.S. has been “taking out” Iranian oil and predicting that it will drop “like a rock.” He also revealed on Truth Social that a “secret mission to support Oil Tankers and other Commercial Ships through the Strait of Hormuz” has resulted in “more than 100 MILLION Barrels of Oil making its way through the Strait, and into the Open Market,” potentially mitigating rising energy prices.
📺 DETAIL: Inflation surged to 4.2 percent in May, an increase from 3.8 percent a month prior and the fastest increase in three years. The spike in inflation was primarily driven by increases in energy costs. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has risen for the third consecutive month, with energy bills, including gas and electricity, nearly 25 percent higher than a year ago. The average price of a gallon of regular gasoline has surged to $4.15 from $2.98 in February. This followed the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, which resulted in the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route for oil, gas, and fertilizer exports. In addition to rising energy costs, the cost of medical care, personal care, communication, plane tickets, and recreation has significantly increased, contributing to inflationary pressures.
💬  KEY QUOTE: “I love it. I love the inflation. You know why? Because as soon as this war is over … Do you know we’ve been taking out millions of barrels of oil? Nobody knows it. You know who doesn’t know? Iran until right now. Late at night, with no lights. Because they don’t have any radar, because we blasted the crap out of it. We took it out. That’s why oil’s $85 a barrel… When the war is over? It’s coming down. It’s going to come down like a rock.” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: In response to higher inflation, the likelihood of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates to curtail spending increases. The current rate of inflation far exceeds the Federal Reserve’s long-term target of two percent. Adjustments in interest rates are likely to impact borrowing costs and consumer confidence.
📺 FLASHBACK: In late April, according to the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index, consumer sentiment crashed to a record low of 49.8, the lowest level since data collection began in 1978. The drop in consumer confidence was chalked up to the ongoing Iran war.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Inflation in the United States has surged to its highest level in three years, driven by rising energy costs created by the Iran war and disruptions to global supply chains.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: Clear Majority of Brits Oppose Giving Up Brexit Powers for Deal with EU.

New polling has revealed that a clear majority of British voters do not want to surrender control over British laws in exchange for economic integration with the European Union.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll has revealed that most British people are opposed to closer co-operation with the European Union (EU) if it means surrendering British sovereignty.
📺 DETAIL: Commissioned by campaign group Britain Unbound and carried out by YouGov, the largest polling firm in the United Kingdom, the survey revealed that roughly 60 percent of British people are unwilling to exchange control over British laws for economic integration with the EU. Only 27 percent supported re-joining the Single Market—a free trade and shared regulatory zone, including “free movement” of migrant workers between EU members—in exchange for ceding control over British laws. Opposition to surrendering British sovereignty cut across multiple demographic dividing lines, including traditionally pro-EU groups and cohorts. Around half of participants from London, the area with the most favorable view of re-joining the EU, opposed compromising British sovereignty in exchange for the supposed economic benefits. The findings were released on Friday amid ongoing discussion of British attitudes towards the EU, 10 years after the 2016 vote to leave the EU.
🎯 IMPACT: The current Labour Party government of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been incrementally building closer economic and political ties with the EU since coming to power in 2024. Several prominent Labour figures have openly discussed and even called for Britain to rejoin the bloc, despite the fact that Britain only officially left the EU at the end of 2020. This polling suggests that sovereignty remains a key issue surrounding relations with the EU, and that even when the British public believes that there are economic upsides to EU membership, the desire to remain a self-governing, independent country remains paramount.
📺 FLASHBACK: Since coming to power, Prime Minister Starmer has sought to partially undo post-Brexit immigration controls and floated the possibility of overturning the vote to leave the EU. This is despite the fact that Brexit allowed Britain to avoid a 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imposed by the United States by restoring its power to conduct an independent trade policy, and Britain has proven generally better positioned to negotiate with the U.S. compared to the EU.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New polling has revealed that a clear majority of British voters do not want to surrender control over British laws in exchange for economic integration with the European Union.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Immigration Officers Warned That English Flag is ‘Intimidating’ for Migrants.

An official report warned immigration detention officers in England that displaying the English flag intimidates detained migrants.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Immigration officers in the United Kingdom have been told that wearing England flag badges is “intimidating” to migrants detained for deportation.
📺 DETAIL: Last year, during the summer, officers working at an immigration detention facility in the United Kingdom were told that wearing England flag badges on their uniforms “risked perceptions of bias or even intimidation among detained people, especially in the light of recent anti-immigration protests in which flag displays were prominent.” The officers were wearing the badges to show support for the England women’s soccer team following their victory at the European Championship. Under British law, migrants with no legal standing to remain in the country must be held for the short-term in government-approved facilities before they are sent back to their country of origin or released. Among others, the display of the national flag was listed as a potential cause for “emotional distress.” The report was published on Wednesday by the Independent Monitoring Boards (IMB), public oversight bodies inside prisons, removal facilities, and similar facilities. The IMB’s annual report is based on 127 annual reports from relevant facilities.
💬 KEY QUOTE: At a minimum, the Board concluded that this raised concerns about professional standards and workplace culture at the facility,” read the report from the IMB.
🎯 IMPACT: This story underscores the extent to which England’s national flag has come to be regarded as a divisive political symbol by the country’s own authorities. In early April, Oxfordshire County Council in England threatened the ‘Raise the Colours’ campaign, which has been raising English and British flags on lampposts and other public infrastructure across the country, with legal action. The leader of the council said: “The widespread installation of flags by Raise the Colours is not a sign of patriotism. It is an act of intimidation and division.” The month prior, a leaked government report described the British, English, and Scottish flags as “tools of hate.”

Image by Les Chatfield.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An official report warned immigration detention officers in England that displaying the English flag intimidates detained migrants.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. Strikes Eliminate Over 200 Jihadists in Nigeria.

Coordinated missions between U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and Nigerian government forces have dealt a significant blow to the Islamic State in West Africa, eliminating key figures and disrupting militant networks.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and Nigerian government forces conducted joint operations in northeast Nigeria, killing over 200 Islamic State jihadists, including Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, a high-ranking ISIS leader. No U.S. or Nigerian personnel were harmed.
📺 DETAIL: The operations are part of an expanding U.S.-Nigeria security partnership that has grown since President Donald J. Trump ordered airstrikes against ISIS-linked militants in December 2025, citing attacks on Christian communities. Trump has repeatedly accused Nigeria of failing to protect Christians from Islamist violence, forcing Nigerian officials to deny claims of a Christian genocide and increase cooperation with the U.S.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, second in command of ISIS globally, thought he could hide in Africa, but little did he know we had sources who kept us informed on what he was doing. He will no longer terrorize the people of Africa, or help plan operations to target Americans.” – President Donald J. Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The elimination of Abu-Bilal al-Minuki and other militants significantly weakens the Islamic State’s operational capabilities in West Africa and reduces its ability to plan attacks globally. President Trump hailed al-Minuki’s death as a major blow to ISIS, saying the militant leader would “no longer terrorize the people of Africa” or help plan attacks against Americans.
📺 FLASHBACK: In December 2025, U.S. airstrikes authorized by President Trump targeted ISIS-linked militants in Nigeria. Trump had previously criticized Nigeria for failing to protect Christians from jihadists disproportionately targeting Christian communities.
📈 DATA: Nigeria ranked seventh on Open Doors’ 2026 World Watch List for Christian persecution, with reports of killings, abductions, and forced conversions targeting Christian communities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Coordinated missions between U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and Nigerian government forces have dealt a significant blow to the Islamic State in West Africa, eliminating key figures and disrupting militant networks.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Migrants Burned Out of Houses After Sudanese Man Charged with Attempted Beheading.

Protests in Belfast, Northern Ireland, after a Sudanese refugee allegedly tried to behead a white man escalated into serious disorder on Tuesday, with houses believed to be hosting migrants burned down.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: An attempted beheading on Monday night in Belfast, Northern Ireland, sparked violent unrest across the city on Tuesday. Houses were set on fire, with migrant residents reported to be targeted, and Turkish barber shops and other ethnic minority businesses were vandalized. The suspect in the attempted beheading, Sudanese refugee Hadi Alodid, has been charged with attempted murder and other offenses.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The attempted beheading took place on Monday night in the Kinnaird Avenue area of north Belfast, with subsequent unrest spreading to multiple locations across Northern Ireland on Tuesday evening.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Groups of masked men burning families out of their homes is nothing less than disgusting cowardice,” said First Minister Michelle O’Neill, whose position is roughly equivalent to that of a U.S. state governor.
🎯 IMPACT: The unrest has left several families displaced, with houses and vehicles destroyed, and has heightened racial tensions. Police resources have been stretched as they respond to the disorder, and political leaders are calling for calm.
📺 DETAIL: The victim of the attempted beheading, Stephen Ogilvy, sustained severe injuries, including the loss of his left eye. The suspect, a Sudanese refugee, entered Northern Ireland, which is part of the United Kingdom, via its open border with the Republic of Ireland, which is part of the European Union. He was able to claim asylum despite first flying to Paris, France, and then to Dublin before crossing the British border, meaning he was far from any danger long before he lodged his asylum claim.
📺 FLASHBACK: Tensions in Northern Ireland have historically flared into violence, often linked to divisions between the Irish republican community, which is largely Catholic, and the British unionist community, which is largely Protestant. The current unrest highlights ongoing challenges in integrating even more disparate communities into the British province.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Protests in Belfast, Northern Ireland, after a Sudanese refugee allegedly tried to behead a white man escalated into serious disorder on Tuesday, with houses believed to be hosting migrants burned down.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Somali Gang’ and Accomplice Charged with Shooting Death of White Teen.

Four men face charges following an alleged robbery setup in Mankato that resulted in the murder of a 17-year-old white boy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Four men have been charged in connection with a robbery setup in Mankato, Minnesota, that led to the shooting death of 17-year-old Tyson Michael Goodsell. The killing occurred when Goodsell was lured to sell THC cartridges and was subsequently shot by members of what has been described as a “Somali gang” and one white accomplice.
👤 WHO WAS INVOLVED: Alleged shooter Abdikhadar Fakhi Mohidin, Ahmed Fuad Mohamud, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamud, and Ryan Robert Wolner are the primary suspects charged in the case.
📰 DETAIL: The criminal complaints allege that Goodsell was set up by a witness who arranged the sale of THC cartridges. Wolner allegedly arranged the robbery. Mohidin reportedly fired six shots into Goodsell’s car after he attempted to drive away, with Goodsell receiving a fatal gunshot to the head and crashing into a townhome.
🎯 IMPACT: The charges against the suspects include second-degree murder, attempted robbery, and conspiracy, highlighting the severity of the crime. Several were on bail for serious charges at the time of the killing.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The incident took place in Mankato, Minnesota, on the night of May 23, 2026.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Four men face charges following an alleged robbery setup in Mankato that resulted in the murder of a 17-year-old white boy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Secures ICE Funding Until End of Term as House Approves $70B Immigration Bill.

The House of Representatives has approved a $70 billion immigration enforcement package, overcoming Democrat opposition and funding President Donald J. Trump’s border security agenda until the end of his term.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The House of Representatives has passed a $70 billion package for immigration enforcement and border security after a narrow vote. The bill has already been approved by the Senate.
📺 DETAIL: Officially called The Secure America Act, the bill was passed by a narrow 214-212 vote on Tuesday. All Republicans present voted for the package, while every Democrat voted against the bill. The bill allocates $38 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), $26 billion for Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and establishes a $5 billion discretionary fund for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The discretionary fund will be controlled by Secretary for Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin. Republican lawmakers used the budget reconciliation process to bypass Democrat obstruction. The package funds the affected agencies through fiscal year 2029.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “They [Democrats] have made it crystal clear. They have made it crystal clear, the Democrat Party in Washington, that they want to go back to open borders. And we’re not going to do that. And we’re not going to do that.” – House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) following the vote on Tuesday
🎯 IMPACT: The bill represents a significant victory for President Donald J. Trump and the administration’s border security agenda. Having been passed by both the House and the Senate, the bill now heads to the President’s desk to be signed into law. He intends to sign the bill tomorrow.
📺 FLASHBACK: In late April, Congress passed a spending bill to fund DHS minus ICE and CBP through September. The bill was passed to end a 76-day shutdown, the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history. President Trump signed the bill into law on the same day. The months-long shutdown was the result of gridlock induced by the Democrats, who objected to funding ICE and CBP. In response, Republican lawmakers vowed to fund the agencies with this separate package.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The House of Representatives has approved a $70 billion immigration enforcement package, overcoming Democrat opposition and funding President Donald J. Trump’s border security agenda until the end of his term.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Judge Rules Iryna Zarutska’s Alleged Murderer is Unfit to Stand Trial.

The black male accused of murdering Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train last year has been ruled mentally unfit to stand trial for the second time, delaying justice in a case that gained international attention.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Decarlos Brown Jr., accused of fatally stabbing Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train in August 2025, was ruled unfit to stand trial for the second time. During a federal court hearing in Charlotte, Brown shouted erratically at the judge and made claims about “material in his body” and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
📺 DETAIL: Prosecutors presented no additional evidence during the brief hearing, relying on evaluations from the Bureau of Prisons and previous state assessments that found him unfit for trial. U.S. Attorney Russ Ferguson said Brown’s prognosis for restoration is considered good and emphasized that authorities remain committed to securing justice for Zarutska and her family while ensuring the defendant receives full constitutional due process. Zarutska was returning home from work on August 22, 2025, when authorities allege Brown fatally stabbed her aboard a Charlotte Blue Line light rail train before fleeing and later being arrested. Surveillance footage reportedly showed the attack, which drew international attention and led to first-degree murder charges at the state level and additional federal charges.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It wasn’t entirely clear what he was yelling out. We’ve seen since the beginning of this case, he says there’s some sort of material that controls him and I think it was related to that. And that plays a little bit of a role in why he was found not competent to stand trial.” – U.S. Attorney Russ Ferguson
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling delays justice for Zarutska and her family. If Brown is unable to regain competency, the case could remain unresolved indefinitely.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The black male accused of murdering Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train last year has been ruled mentally unfit to stand trial for the second time, delaying justice in a case that gained international attention.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.