• PODCAST
  • Breaking
  • SCOOPS
  • SWAG
  • TIPS
  • PRIVATE CHAT
The National Pulse.
  • PODCAST
  • Breaking
  • SCOOPS
  • SWAG
  • TIPS
  • PRIVATE CHAT
  • Analysis
  • Candidate
  • Economics
  • Social Issues

My Trouble with “Never Trump”

  • May 6, 2016
  • Maggie Gallagher
Donald Trump (photo credit: Gage Skidmore)
Donald Trump (photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

I don’t like Donald Trump for president, but I do like Trump voters. It is the job of the presumptive nominee to unite the party and I am pausing for a few breaths, at least before deciding to go third party.

The very thought, though, of uniting behind a independent candidate, as Ben Sasse is urging, exposes my trouble with the Never Trump movement. Any serious third-party effort requires uniting the Cruz and the Kasich factions, and I’m not sure that is either doable or desirable.

You see many stories floating around about how Trump’s rise proves that social conservatism is dead. This is absurd. Trump located himself as a social conservative. He opposes abortion and promised to pass a late-term abortion bill. Right now, the Human Rights Campaign is pounding him for agreeing, in response to a letter that the American Principles Project sent him, to sign the First Amendment Defense Act.

Some social conservatives are leading the Never Trump effort in part because they do not believe Trump will keep his promises and in part because of the man’s character flaws. But the candidate himself defined himself as at least as strong a social conservative as Romney or McCain were. Social conservatives would likely be disappointed by a President Trump but no more than they would have been by a President Romney or a President McCain.

No, the really revolutionary change in policy that Trump represents is on foreign policy and — and this is key — on Republican economics, which has degenerated over the years into Chamber of Commerce economics: protect job creators and all will be well. This is a form of special-interest pleading and the antithesis of what Reagan and Kemp did. It is very similar in fact to the losing economic message of the Party of Ford: spend less and accelerate depreciation.

[…]

Read the full article at National Review.

Maggie Gallagher is a senior fellow at the American Principles Project and can be followed on Twitter @MaggieGallaghe.

0
0
Your e-mail is required to confirm your vote. This is to stop spammers. If you use a fake email, your vote won't be counted.

Maggie Gallagher

Maggie Gallagher is a senior fellow at the American Principles Project.


You May Also Like
View Post

Day 79: How Many Border Czars *Aren’t* There Now?

  • Staff Writer
View Post

On Day 78 Biden Said: We’re Not Impinging On Your Rights, They’re Just Not Absolute.

  • Staff Writer
View Post

On Day 77, Joe Biden Admitted That Walls Work. Sort of.

  • Staff Writer
The National Pulse.
  • What Is The National Pulse?
  • Privacy Policy
Edited by Raheem Kassam

Designed and Implemented by Wahagen Khabayan

Input your search keywords and press Enter.