Thursday, April 2, 2026

Vance Suspended by Bluesky After Praising SCOTUS Ruling on Transing Kids.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Vice President J.D. Vance’s account on Bluesky was suspended within minutes of its creation after his first post discussing the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a Tennessee law banning the use of gender transition procedures on minors. It was later reversed.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Vice President J.D. Vance, Bluesky platform representatives, and the Supreme Court.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday, June 18, 2025, on the Bluesky social media platform.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I found Justice Thomas’s concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called ‘experts’ have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth.” – J.D. Vance.

🎯IMPACT: The account suspension highlights concerns that Bluesky, a popular bolthole for leftists incensed by the less censored regime on X (formerly Twitter) under Elon Musk, is radicalizing users by fostering a far-left echo chamber. However, Bluesky contends the Vice President was suspended in error, and that they “welcome” him to “join the conversation.”

IN FULL

Vice President J.D. Vance was briefly suspended from Bluesky, a social media platform regarded as an explicitly leftist alternative to X (formerly Twitter), shortly after making his first post on Wednesday. The post addressed the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a Tennessee law banning the use of transgender medical treatments and surgeries on children.

Vance’s post included images of the 6-3 majority opinion, which stated that the regulation and legality of transgender treatments should be left to the individual states and not the federal government. He wrote, “I found Justice Thomas’s concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called ‘experts’ have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth.”

Bluesky representatives claim that the suspension, which was eventually reversed, occurred due to automated systems mistakenly flagging Vance’s account as an impersonation attempt. Once reinstated, the account was given a verified badge to confirm its authenticity. A spokesman stated, “The account was quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity. We welcome the Vice President to join the conversation on Bluesky.”

The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to impact similar laws in other states, with 25 states either enacting or proposing comparable legislation. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, stated, “The Court’s role is not ‘to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic’ of [the Tennessee law], but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees. It does not.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Threatens to Deny Visas to UK Government Censors.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration announced a visa ban targeting British officials involved in censoring American citizens, warning that foreign actors who trample free speech rights will no longer be welcome in the United States.

👤Who’s Involved: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, British media regulator Ofcom, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley, and Lucy Connolly, a British mother imprisoned for a social media post.

🧾Key Quote: “We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech,” said Rubio.

⚠️Fallout: British officials were blindsided by the announcement and are scrambling for answers from the White House, as pro-censorship authorities face mounting scrutiny from Washington.

📌Significance: The move marks a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s effort to push back against globalist speech controls and defend the First Amendment from foreign interference.

IN FULL:

British government officials involved in censoring American citizens could soon be barred from setting foot in the United States under a sweeping new measure from the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the visa restrictions on Wednesday, directly targeting foreign bureaucrats and regulators deemed “complicit in censoring” Americans online.

The policy appears to be aimed at Ofcom, the British government media regulator responsible for enforcing the controversial Online Safety Act—a law that critics say enables sweeping censorship and punishes American tech companies with massive fines. Under the legislation, platforms that fail to remove so-called “harmful content” face penalties of up to £18 million (~$24.4 million) or 10 percent of annual revenue, placing U.S.-based firms in the crosshairs of British law.

“For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights,” Rubio said. “It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil.”

The Trump administration has taken particular offense at the British government’s attempts to impose extra-territorial censorship, with Rubio adding: “It is… unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.”

The announcement reportedly caught British officials off guard, with diplomats urgently seeking clarity from Washington. The warning comes just days after it was reported that the White House is actively “monitoring” the case of Lucy Connolly, a British mother sentenced to 31 months in prison for a social media post about a mass stabbing targeting young girls in Southport, England, perpetrated by the son of two African asylum seekers.

That case drew international concern after British officials threatened to prosecute or extradite Americans who violated their hate speech laws online. “We will throw the full force of the law at people,” warned Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the time. “Whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

In response, U.S. State Department officials from the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor traveled to London in March. The diplomats reportedly met with pro-life activists—imprisoned for as little as silently praying inside their heads near abortionist clinics under laws restricting freedom of expression and religion.

The Vice President has taken a personal interest in censorship in Britain and Europe more broadly, warning during a speech in Germany, “In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

EU Funded $750M Anti-Free Speech Campaign.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A report reveals the European Commission has spent nearly €649 million (~$736m) on projects aimed at regulating online speech under the guise of combating “hate speech” and “disinformation.”

👥 Who’s Involved: The European Commission, MCC Brussels think tank, and Dr. Norman Lewis, a digital communication and regulatory policy expert.

📍 Where & When: European Union (EU); report released recently by MCC Brussels.

💬 Key Quote: “This is a top-down, authoritarian, curated consensus, where expression is free only when it speaks the language of compliance established by the Commission,” the report warns.

⚠️ Impact: The report alleges EU-funded programs erode free expression, prioritize censorship, and promote ideological conformity through taxpayer-funded initiatives.

IN FULL:

A newly released report alleges that the European Commission, the European Union’s unelected executive, has funneled the equivalent of around $736 million of taxpayer money into hundreds of projects designed to regulate online speech under the pretext of combating “hate speech” and “disinformation.”

The document, titled Manufacturing Misinformation: The EU-Funded Propaganda War Against Free Speech, was authored by Dr. Norman Lewis, a specialist in digital communication and regulatory policy, and published by the Hungarian think tank MCC Brussels. It accuses the Commission of promoting a “soft authoritarianism” by funding 349 projects through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and universities.

According to the report, this spending exceeds the EU’s annual budget for transnational cancer research by over 30 percent, a discrepancy the authors describe as deliberate. “The EU Commission regards stemming the cancer of free speech as more of a priority than the estimated 4.5 million new cancer cases and almost two million cancer deaths in Europe in 2022,” the report warns.

“This is a top-down, authoritarian, curated consensus, where expression is free only when it speaks the language of compliance established by the Commission,” the report states.

The report criticizes the Commission’s use of vague, euphemistic language—dubbed “NEUspeak”—to obscure its intentions. Project names like FAST LISA and VIGILANT are described as deliberately misleading, with MCC Brussels stating that such initiatives aim to suppress politically undesirable speech in real time using artificial intelligence (AI).

“VIGILANT is an AI surveillance suite aimed at monitoring, classifying, and profiling speech, users, and networks,” the report states, contradicting claims from its designers that the system is ethical and user-focused.

The report further highlights programs targeting young people, which it describes as indoctrination disguised as civic education. These initiatives allegedly train youths to act as “speech police” in a system designed to enforce narrative compliance.

Dr. Lewis argues that taxpayer-funded research is being used to affirm political orthodoxy rather than encourage genuine inquiry. “Research that systematically ‘proves’ this assumption is not research; it is the manufacturing of propaganda,” he writes.

The alarming report comes as the EU routinely regulates speech on social media platforms. Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X, previously stated that the EU had offered him an illegal secret deal to censor posts on the platform.

Image by dimitrisvetsikas1969.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

UK Govt Tries to Force Foreign Companies to Curtail Free Speech.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The United Kingdom’s (UK) government is enforcing its Online Safety Act 2023 globally, targeting foreign platforms like Gab and Kiwi Farms to comply with its online safety standards. Gab refuses to comply, facing potential penalties.

👥 Who’s Involved: The British government; U.S. social platform Gab and forum Kiwi Farms; the UK’s Office of Communications (Ofcom); Gab CEO Andrew Torba; the U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer; and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

📍 Where & When: The enforcement has started internationally in 2023; a specific notice was sent on March 26, 2025, for Gab to reply bizarelly by March 16.

💬 Key Quote: Gab’s statement declares, “We will not pay one cent,” emphasizing the refusal to comply with UK demands.

⚠️ Impact: The UK’s law attempt sets a precedent that could affect global platforms, leading to potential international trade retaliation and impacting the future of free expression online.

IN FULL:

The British government’s Online Safety Act 2023 is extending its reach beyond the country’s borders by asserting compliance demands on foreign-based platforms. Notable among these platforms are Gab and Kiwi Farms, both vocal advocates of free speech.

Critics argue that this campaign, under the guise of “online safety,” represents a form of government control over thought. The National Pulse previously reported that U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance called out Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to his face for the “infringements on free speech” in the United Kingdom, as he pledged he would do in an exclusive interview with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, in February.

Gab, an American company dedicated to First Amendment rights, is directly challenging the UK’s demands. The British Office of Communications (Ofcom) has threatened significant penalties against Gab, potentially amounting to £18 million (over $23 million USD) or 10 percent of worldwide revenue, for non-compliance with British regulations. In response, Gab has approached the United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and the Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking trade-related actions against the UK.

Gab CEO Andrew Torba has made the company’s position clear by publicly rejecting the demands. “We will not comply. We will not pay one cent,” Torba wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). He added, “We will defend our UK users’ right to speak freely and reject any law that compels censorship.”

A notice from Ofcom to Gab, issued on March 26, 2025, gave an impossible deadline of March 16, which Gab used to underscore its criticism of the oversight’s perceived arbitrary nature.

On a similar note, Kiwi Farms, known for its unmoderated content, has responded by cautioning UK visitors about the potential loss of privacy. The site warns users that British authorities could monitor their online actions without IP masking services like Cloudflare. It advises using VPNs or Tor and explicitly states its rejection of foreign censorship.

Supporters of free speech have criticized the Online Safety Act as part of broader efforts to control dissent online. Gab warns that yielding to such efforts could risk similar impacts across U.S. tech companies.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Catholics Push Back Against Satanic ‘Black Mass’ at State Capitol.

Kansas is set to witness a confrontation over a satanic “black mass” planned to take place at the State Capitol in Topeka on March 28. The event, organized by The Satanic Grotto, has stirred opposition from local Catholics and the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property (TFP), a national Catholic group.

TFP has launched a nationwide petition urging Kansas Governor Laura Kelly to prevent the event, highlighting that it disrespects the beliefs of millions of Catholics worldwide and other religious groups. The petition, which as of now has gathered over 28,000 signatures, asserts that sacrilege should not be considered free speech. TFP has also planned a “rally of reparation” outside the Capitol for simultaneous prayer and atonement.

Chuck Weber, executive director of the Kansas Catholic Conference, noted that bishops in the state are evaluating both spiritual and legal responses to the scheduled event. He emphasized that, if it proceeds, it signifies blatant anti-Catholic sentiment and insults people of good will. The group behind the event plans to use the grounds for satanic rites, as stated in a Facebook post.

TFP’s John Horvat publicly expressed his dismay over the use of the State Capitol Building for what he calls severe blasphemy. Horvat urged Americans to join in peaceful protest, sign the petition, and offer prayers, defending their faith against this occurrence.

Historical success in opposing similar events gives TFP hope; previous protests have led to the cancellation of a Harvard University “black mass” in 2014 and influenced a satanic conference to avoid Boston in 2024. Weber added that the Catholic Bishops of Kansas are calling for prayers for both the conversion of the event’s participants and for personal introspection during Lent.

show less
Kansas is set to witness a confrontation over a satanic “black mass” planned to take place at the State Capitol in Topeka on March 28. The event, organized by The Satanic Grotto, has stirred opposition from local Catholics and the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property (TFP), a national Catholic group. show more

WATCH: Vance Calls Out UK PM for ‘Infringements on Free Speech’ to His Face.

Vice President J.D. Vance has called out Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for the “infringements on free speech” in the United Kingdom to his face, as he pledged he would do in an exclusive interview with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, earlier this month.

“[W]e… know that there have been infringements of free speech that actually affect not just the British—of course, what the British do in their own country is up to them—but also affect American technology companies and by extension American citizens, so that is something that we’ll talk about today at lunch,” the Vice President said at a media event alongside Starmer and President Donald J. Trump.

“We’ve had free speech for a very, very long time in, in, the United Kingdom, and, uh, uh, it will last for a very, very long time,” Starmer stammers in response. “Certainly, we wouldn’t wanna reach across U.S. citizens, and we don’t, and that’s absolutely right,” he adds.

Britain does not, in fact, have free speech, with British citizens regularly being arrested, charged, and sometimes imprisoned for various speech crimes. These include sending “grossly offensive” messages and, in at least one case, simply sharing “a social media post containing inaccurate information.”

The country’s previous Conservative Party government explicitly rejected a petition for a Free Speech Act abolishing “hate speech” laws and bestowing First Amendment-style protections on British citizens, claiming that “The Government is committed to upholding free speech [but] this freedom cannot be an excuse to cause harm or spread hatred.”

Britons’ theoretical right to free speech is based on the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 10 of the Convention bestows a theoretical right to “freedom of expression” but notes that this right can be abridged “in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”

Contrary to Starmer’s claim that British speech restrictions do not extend to American citizens, England’s Director of Public Prosecutions, Stephen Parkinson, threatened to try to extradite foreign nationals for online speech crimes in 2024.

WATCH:

show less
Vice President J.D. Vance has called out Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for the "infringements on free speech" in the United Kingdom to his face, as he pledged he would do in an exclusive interview with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, earlier this month. show more

Vance Warns Europe: American Taxpayers Will Not Subsidize the Defense of Countries That Jail People for ‘Mean Tweets.’

Vice President J.D. Vance has warned that American taxpayers and military servicemen may not continue to underwrite Europe’s defense if European governments continue pushing censorship. Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday, he said, “Think about this: Germany’s entire defense is subsidized by the American taxpayer. There are thousands upon thousands of American troops in Germany today. Do you think that the American taxpayer is going to stand for that if you get thrown in jail in Germany for posting a mean tweet? Of course they’re not.”

Referring to his recent speech at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, the Vice President explained that “the point that I tried to make to our European friends… is that [our] friendship is based on shared values. You do not have shared values if you’re jailing people for saying we should close down our border; you don’t have shared values if you cancel elections because you don’t like the result—and that happened in Romania—[and] you do not have shared values if you’re so afraid of your own people that you silence them and shut them up.”

“So, let’s have shared values. Let’s defend democracy; let’s have free expression, not just in the United States but all over the Western world. That is the path to strong alliances in Europe.” he concluded.

Vice President Vance made a similar point in an exclusive interview with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, on Wednesday, saying, “American troops do not sacrifice to protect censorship. They do not sacrifice in order to create a world where you get thrown in prison for posting an Internet meme. If you want American hard power to continue to support the so-called rules-based order, then you actually have to respect the values of the people who are sacrificing for that hard power.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less
Vice President J.D. Vance has warned that American taxpayers and military servicemen may not continue to underwrite Europe's defense if European governments continue pushing censorship. Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday, he said, "Think about this: Germany's entire defense is subsidized by the American taxpayer. There are thousands upon thousands of American troops in Germany today. Do you think that the American taxpayer is going to stand for that if you get thrown in jail in Germany for posting a mean tweet? Of course they're not." show more

EXC: VP Vance *WILL* Raise Free Speech Issues with UK Govt During Official Visit Next Week.

Vice President J.D. Vance told Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, that he will reiterate the Trump administration’s commitment to freedom of speech when Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer visits the U.S. next week. This follows Vice President Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, in which he warned against the erosion of free speech in Europe, and the subsequent imprisonment of a British man for sending emails intended to “insult and offend” London Mayor Sadiq Khan and government minister Jess Phillips, from Starmer’s Labour Party.

Asked by Kassam if he planned to reiterate his comments t Starmer and his team next week in person, Vance responded, “We certainly will,” adding, “[T]his is not hard, Raheem. We’re simply telling them to respect the values on which our civilization was founded, that you ought to debate with one another, you ought to, you know, your government should respect when the people have a dissenting viewpoint. It’s very simple, and it’s very obvious.”

“And I think that, when we talk about shared values, I think one of the most important shared values is that we, again, ought to listen to our people and not try to throw them in prison when they disagree with what the government’s doing,” he stressed.

Vance said the strong, adverse reaction to his Munich speech “from some of our European friends” indicates that “frankly, they’ve taken too much leadership from the Biden administration” and “leaned too much into the censorship regime.

Earlier in his interview with Kassam, the Vice President highlighted that the purpose of his speech in Munich was not to “wag my finger at Europe and say, ‘You guys have become too censorious,'” but to note that the U.S. and its transatlantic partners together had developed a censorship problem, led by the Biden-Harris government.

“[A]s I said in Europe, President Trump is going to take a much different view on this stuff,” Vance emphasized.

show less
Vice President J.D. Vance told Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, that he will reiterate the Trump administration's commitment to freedom of speech when Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer visits the U.S. next week. This follows Vice President Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, in which he warned against the erosion of free speech in Europe, and the subsequent imprisonment of a British man for sending emails intended to "insult and offend" London Mayor Sadiq Khan and government minister Jess Phillips, from Starmer's Labour Party. show more

Over 7,400 Request ‘New Media’ Press Credentials for Trump White House in Just 24 Hours.

The White House press office claims to have received over 7,400 requests for press credentials after announcing its “new media” seat in the briefing room, which is open to alternative media, podcasters, and online influencers. The swarm of applications came within the first 24 hours of the announcement, which was made during the first press briefing given by President Donald J. Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on January 27.

Leavitt described the new seat, saying it would be open to those who do not have permanent press credentials for the White House and would be rotated among applicants who qualify to attend White House briefings.

Under previous administrations, the White House Correspondents’ Association traditionally acted as gatekeepers for briefings, holding 49 permanent seats in the briefing room. Trump’s move is a reversal of the Biden-Harris regime-era policy that revoked press passes to journalists who did not meet various credential requirements.

“This White House believes strongly in the First Amendment, so it’s why our team will work diligently to restore the press passes of the 440 journalists whose passes were wrongly revoked by the previous administration,” Leavitt said during her briefing.

Leavitt served as national press secretary for Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign and is the youngest White House press secretary in history at just 27 years old.

show less
The White House press office claims to have received over 7,400 requests for press credentials after announcing its "new media" seat in the briefing room, which is open to alternative media, podcasters, and online influencers. The swarm of applications came within the first 24 hours of the announcement, which was made during the first press briefing given by President Donald J. Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on January 27. show more