GET THE APP
Monday, October 6, 2025

Category: Election Integrity
May 30, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Fulton County Sued by Election Board Member Over 2024 Data Access Denial.

Julie Adams, a Republican member of the Fulton County, Georgia, Board of Elections, has filed a lawsuit against the county, the board, and the county’s election director, Nadine Williams. The lawsuit, filed last week, alleges that Adams was denied access to critical election information during this year’s primary elections, hindering her ability to prevent election fraud.

Adams claims that Williams consistently obstructed her from performing her duties as a board member. “Over the years, the Board has purportedly delegated core BRE responsibilities to an appointed Election Director. Plaintiff swore an oath to ‘prevent fraud, deceit, and abuse’ in Fulton County elections and to ‘make a true and perfect return,'” the lawsuit states. The lawsuit further emphasizes that Adams’ obligations are “frustrated by the repeated and continuing refusal to allow Plaintiff access to, and direct knowledge of, the information Plaintiff reasonably believes she needs to execute her duties faithfully and thoroughly.”

Adams asserts that Williams denied her requests for access to election-related materials and documents. Williams argued that these materials undergo a “rigorous validation process” and should “simply be trusted.” As a result, Adams voted against certifying the results of the state-level congressional primary held on May 21. She cited her inability to access necessary information as the reason she could not fulfill her responsibilities on the board.

Adams seeks a ruling from Fulton County Superior Court to clarify the role of the county’s election director and to grant her access to election materials. This lawsuit follows recent issues regarding election integrity in Fulton County, including the double counting of approximately 3,075 ballots in the 2020 presidential election.

show less
Julie Adams, a Republican member of the Fulton County, Georgia, Board of Elections, has filed a lawsuit against the county, the board, and the county's election director, Nadine Williams. The lawsuit, filed last week, alleges that Adams was denied access to critical election information during this year's primary elections, hindering her ability to prevent election fraud. show more
May 30, 2024
Jack Montgomery
Election Integrity

Voter Roll Chaos: Over 26,000 Dead Voters, 92,000 Inactive Voters in Michigan.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is appealing a Tuesday federal court ruling that paused its efforts to cleanse Michigan’s voter rolls of approximately 26,000 deceased residents. Concurrently, the Republican National Committee (RNC) accuses Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson of failing to update the permanent mail ballot list by removing 92,000 inactive registrants.

PILF has filed an appellate brief with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking to overturn a decision from U.S. District Court Judge Jane Beckering in March. Judge Beckering, appointed by Joe Biden, said Michigan makes a “regular and ongoing” good-faith effort to remove ineligible voters, dismissing PILF’s lawsuit, which argued otherwise.

PILF initially sued Benson in November 2021 for allegedly not removing about 26,000 deceased individuals from the state’s voter rolls, arguing this violated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. This federal law mandates states to make “a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.”

In its appeal, PILF underscored that the district court denied its requests to depose Benson and a member of her staff. Additionally, attempts to depose ERIC, a third-party organization aiding Michigan in managing voter lists, were rejected by both a magistrate judge and Beckering.

In a separate lawsuit, the RNC alleges Benson’s office still needs to update the state’s permanent mail ballot list, which includes nearly 92,000 inactive voters. The group contended that failure to remove these obsolete entries violates state law and risks widespread distribution of absentee ballots to incorrect addresses.

An astonishing 20 percent of respondents to a Rasmussen poll on voting by mail admitted to fraud this year, easily enough to have swayed the 2020 election.

show less
The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is appealing a Tuesday federal court ruling that paused its efforts to cleanse Michigan’s voter rolls of approximately 26,000 deceased residents. Concurrently, the Republican National Committee (RNC) accuses Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson of failing to update the permanent mail ballot list by removing 92,000 inactive registrants. show more
May 24, 2024
Election Integrity

Top House Dem Penned Paper Demanding ‘Alien Suffrage.’

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) has a history of advocating for non-citizen voting rights, as revealed by Fox News this week. In 1993, Raskin wrote a paper defending the concept of “Alien Suffrage.” In the paper, titled “Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage,” Raskin contended that excluding non-citizens from voting lacks a constitutional and historical basis.

“In this Article, I will argue that the current blanket exclusion of noncitizens from the ballot is neither constitutionally required nor historically normal,” Raskin wrote.

Raskin, who also serves as the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, was among the 143 Democrats who voted against a measure this week to prevent noncitizens from voting in Washington, D.C. elections. Contrarily, 52 Democrats joined Republicans in favor of the bill. Despite this split, polling data indicates broad public support for restricting voting to U.S. citizens.

Several municipalities in Maryland, including Takoma Park, have allowed foreign nationals to vote in local elections for decades. Advocates argue that resident aliens should have a say in local governance due to their contributions to community life.

However, polling by RMG Research, Inc. for Americans for Citizen Voting indicates that 75 percent of Americans oppose foreign nationals voting in local elections. This widespread sentiment aligns with Republicans’ motivations for the bill.

Moreover, the debate over noncitizen voting has national implications. House Speaker Mike Johnson recently introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act), which aims to tighten voter registration requirements to ensure only citizens are registered. Republican proponents cite the influx of illegal immigrants as heightening the need for such measures. A series of criminal cases in North Carolina revealed that noncitizens are voting and are three times more likely to vote Democrat.

 

show less
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) has a history of advocating for non-citizen voting rights, as revealed by Fox News this week. In 1993, Raskin wrote a paper defending the concept of "Alien Suffrage." In the paper, titled "Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage," Raskin contended that excluding non-citizens from voting lacks a constitutional and historical basis. show more
May 23, 2024
Election Integrity

Pennsylvania Directive May Let Noncitizens Vote.

A formal administrative complaint filed by America First Legal (AFL) alleges a 2018 Pennsylvania State Department directive may allow noncitizens and other ineligible individuals to register to vote. The complaint, filed on behalf of Zimolong, LLC, contends the state election directive contravenes the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, which mandates specific verification processes to ensure voter eligibility.

According to HAVA, a prospective voter must provide either a valid driver’s license number or, if they do not possess one, the last four digits of their Social Security number on their voter registration form. Additionally, election officials must verify these numbers against state and federal databases. This verification system is designed to ensure that only eligible voters are registered.

However, Pennsylvania’s 2018 election directive states that voter registration applications “may not be rejected based solely on a non-match between the applicant’s identifying numbers on their application and the comparison database numbers.” AFL contends that this guidance violates HAVA and potentially allows ineligible individuals, including noncitizens, to be added to the state’s voter rolls. HAVA explicitly states an application may not be processed unless it includes a valid driver’s license number or the last four digits of the applicant’s Social Security number. If an applicant lacks both, the state must assign a unique identifying number.

“Americans all across the United States have legitimate concerns about the security of our elections. Yet the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has adopted and maintained a voter registration process that clearly and unambiguously violates basic federal law intended to provide a minimum baseline of security,” AFL’s executive director and general counsel, Gene Hamilton, said in a statement. He added: “The Secretary of State must abandon this unlawful practice and comply with federal law to prevent fraud in elections in Pennsylvania.”

show less
A formal administrative complaint filed by America First Legal (AFL) alleges a 2018 Pennsylvania State Department directive may allow noncitizens and other ineligible individuals to register to vote. The complaint, filed on behalf of Zimolong, LLC, contends the state election directive contravenes the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, which mandates specific verification processes to ensure voter eligibility. show more
May 22, 2024
William Upton
Election Integrity

Hacked Primary Ballot Unveils MASSIVE Security Flaw in Texas Elections.

A lawsuit filed in Texas alleges that a “willful and systematic disregard of election laws” has allowed a breach in ballot secrecy, impacting most of the state’s voters. The lawsuit, filed by Dr. Laura Pressley and several other voters, contends that the state, in failing to comply with its own election rules, has created a security flaw that allows anyone to reverse engineer for whom a voter cast their ballot.

According to Dr. Pressley’s lawsuit, public information paired with specific data mining techniques can reveal voter choices. Hacking a ballot is accomplished through an algorithm that can decrypt the randomized ID numbers assigned to voters. While the randomized ID numbers are only used by some of the electronic voting machines in the state, they appear to be used prevalently in the state’s most populous counties. Texas state election law, however, actually stipulates that voter ID numbers must be consecutively numbered.

GOP CHAIRMAN’S HACKED BALLOT. 

The ballot security flaw was recently used by the independent Texas news outlet Current Revolt to expose for which candidates for office Matt Rinaldi, the chairman of the Republican Party of Texas (RPT), voted during the state’s Super Tuesday 2024 primary election. In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Rinaldi claimed he voted for former President Donald J. Trump in the March primary. However, the ballot copy acquired by Current Revolt shows that he voted for Governor Ron DeSantis. The Florida Governor dropped out of the Republican presidential primary race weeks before the Texas primary.

Experts such as Dr. Walter Daugherity from Texas A&M University have verified a repetitive pattern in the random number generation used to assign ballots, adding credibility to Dr. Pressley’s claims. The process — detailed in the lawsuit — shows how unique ballot numbers can be linked back to individual voters, making ballot secrecy an illusion.

show less
A lawsuit filed in Texas alleges that a "willful and systematic disregard of election laws" has allowed a breach in ballot secrecy, impacting most of the state's voters. The lawsuit, filed by Dr. Laura Pressley and several other voters, contends that the state, in failing to comply with its own election rules, has created a security flaw that allows anyone to reverse engineer for whom a voter cast their ballot. show more
May 22, 2024
Election Integrity
Immigration

Associated Press: ‘Yes, Non-Citizens Vote, But It’s Not a Big Deal.’

Republicans are advancing the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill that would mandate proof of citizenship for voting, citing concerns over illegal voting by noncitizens despite opposition from Democrats. The Associated Press (AP) has acknowledged instances of foreign nationals illegally registering and voting. However, it insists that the SAVE Act is not necessary.

AP reporter Ali Swenson states that “the specter of immigrants voting illegally in the U.S. has erupted into a leading election-year talking point for Republicans.” Although Swenson concedes that there have been incidents of noncitizens registering and voting illegally, she argues that federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections and suggests that cases of illegal voting by noncitizens are not occurring in significant numbers. She also insists that states already have measures to counteract such actions.

Critics of the current system, however, note that the federal government does not require documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration. Federal voter registration forms only require individuals to affirm their citizenship by checking a box, effectively making the process reliant on the honor system.

Democrats oppose the SAVE Act, arguing that additional ID requirements could disenfranchise eligible voters who might not have immediate access to documents such as birth certificates or Social Security cards. Swenson cited a left-leaning activist who contended that IDs like Social Security numbers or driver’s licenses already entail proof of citizenship. Proponents of the SAVE Act argue that if such IDs already reflect citizenship status, requiring them should not constitute disenfranchisement.

Earlier this month, the National Pulse reported that not only are illegal aliens voting, but they are also three times more likely to vote for Democrats.

show less
Republicans are advancing the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill that would mandate proof of citizenship for voting, citing concerns over illegal voting by noncitizens despite opposition from Democrats. The Associated Press (AP) has acknowledged instances of foreign nationals illegally registering and voting. However, it insists that the SAVE Act is not necessary. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
Funnily enough, I think I am actually eligible to vote, as a non-citizen, in Washington, D
for exclusive members-only insights
Funnily enough, I think I am actually eligible to vote, as a non-citizen, in Washington, D show more
for exclusive members-only insights
May 17, 2024
William Upton
Election Integrity

Soros And Dem ‘Dark Money’ Groups Are Advising Election Officials and Bankrolling Poll Workers.

Democrat-aligned ‘dark money‘ groups are increasing their efforts to interfere in the 2024 presidential election as former President Donald J. Trump pulls further ahead of Joe Biden. Some of these ‘dark money’ organizations have received millions from left-wing billionaire and globalist George Soros.

The group Power the Polls has unveiled a new advisory council dedicated to training and fielding an army of pro-Democrat poll watchers ahead of the November presidential election. Power the Polls, founded in 2020, received its seed money from the Open Society Foundations — the primary vehicle for George Soros to distribute his vast wealth into U.S. political operations.

Power the Polls’ advisory council lacks bipartisan representation and is spearheaded by two prominent anti-Trump activists, actress Kerry Washington and former Congressman Adam Kinzinger. The group has even secured a partnership with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R).

More concerningly, Power the Polls is tied to Work Elections, a project of the Fair Election Network. Convoluted layers of financial and political ties are often used by Democrat-aligned ‘dark money‘ groups to hide their controlling organizations and funders. In this case, the Fair Election Network is a subsidiary of the New Venture Fund, a non-profit foundation controlled by Arabella Advisors.

The National Pulse has reported extensively on Arabella Advisors, a for-profit consulting firm with deep ties to national progressive Democrat leaders. Since the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, Arabella has built a vast network of non-profits and non-government organizations (NGOs) that act as clearing houses for vast sums of donor money for a myriad of left-wing causes. Arabella has funneled at least $10 million to pro-Hamas protestors and is currently involved in an effort to take over state and local media networks to push pro-Democrat propaganda.

show less
Democrat-aligned 'dark money' groups are increasing their efforts to interfere in the 2024 presidential election as former President Donald J. Trump pulls further ahead of Joe Biden. Some of these 'dark money' organizations have received millions from left-wing billionaire and globalist George Soros. show more
ZUCKERBUCKS
May 17, 2024
Election Integrity

Lefty Media Continues To Run Cover for Zuckerberg’s Election Interference.

The Democrat-aligned corporate media is continuing to push a revisionist history when discussing Mark Zuckerberg’s election interference operation. Zuckerberg has come under fire on numerous occasions for blatantly meddling in American democracy through his contributions to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). However, the corporate media has continually claimed Republicans “weaponized Mark Zuckerberg’s donations,” among other things.

On April 2, 2024, Wisconsin voters moved to ban the private funding of elections — effectively ending Zuckerberg’s ability to influence state ballot regulations through groups like CTCL. This sparked a bevy of “Republicans pounce” style narratives from various media outlets. In reality, the Democrat-aligned media was fretting about CTCL’s loss of control of election policy, especially in Democrat jurisdictions where ballot fraud and other election abnormalities have become a concern.

A USA Today story, published shortly after Wisconsin voters passed election changes, suggested that the electorate was the victim of “misinformation” regarding the Facebook CEO’s contributions to CTCL. The newspaper claimed that Zuckerberg had given more to pro-Trump election jurisdictions than those that went for Biden. However, USA Today omitted essential details from FEC data, which shows that 90 percent of CTCL funds went to Democrat-controlled election jurisdictions. The Trump jurisdictions received just a fraction of the funding.

Despite numerous state bans, CTCL continues to operate clandestinely in many U.S. states. Through a series of publicly available webinars, CTCL has continued to provide training on topics like working with leftist fact-checkers, lobbying elected officials, and building relationships with selected journalists. The National Pulse reported in April that Zuckerberg’s Facebook is alleged to have already interfered in U.S. elections at least 39 times since 2008.

show less
The Democrat-aligned corporate media is continuing to push a revisionist history when discussing Mark Zuckerberg's election interference operation. Zuckerberg has come under fire on numerous occasions for blatantly meddling in American democracy through his contributions to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). However, the corporate media has continually claimed Republicans "weaponized Mark Zuckerberg’s donations," among other things. show more
May 16, 2024
Ed Kozak
Corruption
Election 2024
Election Integrity

The ‘Bidenbucks’ Coverup, and the Rush to Find Answers…

Congressional Republicans are demanding answers about the Joe Biden regime’s use of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to engage alleged in pro-Democrat get-out-the-vote efforts. The Biden SBA has “partnered” with the Michigan Secretary of State to spend taxpayer money on voter registration efforts in the key battleground state, an endeavor critics say is a thinly veiled effort to spend ‘Bidenbucks’ on buying Biden voters. It is refusing to comply with the House Small Business Committee’s investigation.

Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, said the regime’s use of the SBA for voter registration in Michigan was “beyond disturbing.”

Ernst, alongside Rep. Roger Williams, R-Texas, Chairman of the House Small Business Committee, is seeking answers regarding the SBA’s connection to the Michigan voter registration project. Earlier this year, a memorandum was signed between the SBA and the Michigan Department of State “to promote civic engagement and voter registration,” with the partnership set to continue until the beginning of 2036. This move is part of President Biden’s Executive Order 14019, often referred to as “Bidenbucks” by election integrity advocates.

Last week, Williams issued subpoenas to Tyler Robinson and Arthur Plews, both prominent SBA officials, following their noncompliance with a congressional investigation into suspected “engineering” activities.

Ernst and Williams stated that SBA officials continue to disregard their requests for documentation and have not attended scheduled interviews, intensifying uncertainty around the regime’s transparency. Moving forward, Biden‘s executive order and the SBA’s involvement in voter registration will likely face legal challenges and rigorous analyses.

“Using taxpayer dollars in an attempt to engage in federal campaign activities is a gross abuse of official agency resources and needs to be further investigated,” Ernst wrote in a letter to SBA Administrator Isabel Casillas Guzman last month.

show less
Congressional Republicans are demanding answers about the Joe Biden regime's use of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to engage alleged in pro-Democrat get-out-the-vote efforts. The Biden SBA has "partnered" with the Michigan Secretary of State to spend taxpayer money on voter registration efforts in the key battleground state, an endeavor critics say is a thinly veiled effort to spend 'Bidenbucks' on buying Biden voters. It is refusing to comply with the House Small Business Committee's investigation. show more
May 16, 2024
Election Integrity
Lawfare

Obama Judge Rejects Marc Elias’s Election Lawfare in Wisconsin.

Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsin’s election integrity laws. The firm’s argument, which the presiding judge termed “head-scratching,” sought to challenge the state’s statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voter’s ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights.

Presiding over the case was U.S. District Court Chief Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama-appointed judge. He dismissed the petition against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expressing his consternation at the claims, insinuating that they lacked logic and soundness.

“The absurd results to which plaintiffs’ interpretation would lead are reason enough to reject that interpretation,” Peterson wrote. “It is plaintiffs’ interpretation that leads to head-scratching results.”

Furthermore, considering the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the judge clarified that neither explicitly prohibited a state from enforcing a witnessing system for absentee voting. The Elias Law Group alleged that the witness requirement would violate these federal statutes. Elias‘s lawyers “have not shown that either the Voting Rights Act of 1965 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits a state from requiring absentee voters to prepare their ballot in front of a witness,” wrote Peterson.

Elias’s firm argued that witnessing and signing absentee ballots was overly arduous and inconvenient. However, Judge Peterson upheld the traditions of election integrity, maintaining that such steps were necessary to prevent potential electoral fraud and the undue influence of ballot harvesting.

In response to the irregularities and controversies that plagued the country in 2020, Wisconsin has taken a national lead in ensuring election integrity heading into the 2024 election.

show less
Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsin’s election integrity laws. The firm’s argument, which the presiding judge termed "head-scratching," sought to challenge the state's statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voter's ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights. show more