Judicial Watch is filing a civil rights lawsuit on behalf of the Libertarian Party of Mississippi, challenging the Mississippi election law that permits absentee ballots to be received as long as five business days after Election Day.
The suit states that “[u]nder federal law, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of every even-numbered year is election day (“Election Day”) for federal elections… Congress recently reaffirmed a single national Election Day… Under the recent Congressional amendments, no extension of Election Day shall be allowed unless there are ‘force majeure events that are extraordinary and catastrophic’.”
“The law requires an ‘Election Day,’ not an ‘Election Week.’ Mississippi’s five-day extension of Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement on Monday.
The group has presided over or aided in a number of successful cases to help restore America’s elections to a more commonly accepted, pre-pandemic, Western standard.
show less
Judicial Watch is filing a civil rights lawsuit on behalf of the Libertarian Party of Mississippi, challenging the Mississippi election law that permits absentee ballots to be received as long as five business days after Election Day.
The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) censored social media users who expressed concerns over mail-in voting’s impact on election integrity. Documents released by America First Legal indicate that CISA knew of potential election integrity problems posed by mail-in ballots. Nevertheless, they were undeterred in censoring Americans who expressed similar concerns.
America First Legal alleges that CISA knew by September 2020 that in-person voting was unlikely to result in the mass spread of COVID-19. Yet the government agency perpetuated the narrative that mail-in-voting was necessary to mitigate a widespread illness outbreak.
The documents also reveal that CISA created “a chart specifying six significant fraud risks presented by mail-in voting.” Many of the risks listed were raised by average Americans who were subsequently censored on social media. The risks included the impact a “compressed timeline” would have on successfully implementing mail-in voting infrastructure, the high risk of “[i]ntegrity attacks on voter registration data and systems,” and confusion over the mail-in-voting process resulting in a high rate of rejection of ballots.
Despite the internal concerns at CISA, public-facing statements from CISA Director Chris Krebs insisted the process was accurate and secure. The agency contracted with Deloitte to flag and censor social media posts that raised concerns over the integrity of mail-in ballots.
“Common sense dictates that ballots submitted via mail are inherently less secure than verified, in-person voting by a citizen who shows identification before casting his or her ballot,” Gene Hamilton, Vice President and General Counsel of America First Legal, said in a statement.
He continued: “CISA received reporting and was aware of the risks associated with mass mail-in voting schemes, yet it simultaneously was engaged in an unprecedented censorship campaign to mislead the American people about the truth.”
show less
The Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) censored social media users who expressed concerns over mail-in voting's impact on election integrity. Documents released by America First Legal indicate that CISA knew of potential election integrity problems posed by mail-in ballots. Nevertheless, they were undeterred in censoring Americans who expressed similar concerns.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) received a cease-and-desist order from New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella’s office in response to alleged violations of the state’s voter suppression laws.
On January 5, the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee submitted a letter to the New Hampshire Democratic Party (NHDP) ordering it to comply with DNC guidance to “take steps to educate the public that January 23rd” — New Hampshire’s Democratic presidential primary — “is a non-binding presidential preference event and is meaningless and the NHDP and presidential candidates should take all steps possible not to participate.”
“Regardless of whether the DNC refuses to award delegates to the party’s national convention based on the results of the January 23, 2024, New Hampshire Democratic Presidential Primary Election, that election is not ‘meaningless.’ Your statements to the contrary are false, deceptive, and misleading,” Assistant Attorney General Brendan O’Donnell wrote in the cease-and-desist letter.
“Telling the public or any person qualified to register to vote or vote in New Hampshire that the [aforementioned election] is ‘meaningless,’ or soliciting NHDP or any other party to make such statements, constitutes an attempt to prevent or deter another person from voting or registering to vote based on fraudulent, deceptive, misleading, or spurious grounds or information,” O’Donnell continued.
The DNC’s demands are designed to bolster the revised primary calendar it released last year, which put South Carolina’s primary before New Hampshire’s, a decision made ostensibly to give minority voters greater representation in the primary process, but which many observers note also gives Biden an advantage.
show less
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) received a cease-and-desist order from New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella’s office in response to alleged violations of the state’s voter suppression laws.
show more
OpenAI will direct ChatGPT users to the website “CanIVote.org” — run by the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) — to curb what they believe will be attempts to abuse the AI chat tool in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. NASS, an umbrella ‘non-partisan’ organization for state government’s Secretaries of State — is run by the Republican Kansas Secretary of State, Scott Schwab. Despite evidence of irregularities, Schwab insisted there was no indication of fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
During the 2022 primary election, Schwab came under fire from his Republican primary challenger, Mike Brown, for numerous administrative errors, including printing duplicated ballots. Mistakes like duplicate ballots and errors with voting machines continue to undermine confidence in U.S. elections.
The move by OpenAI — whose valuation may climb to $80 billion, making it the third most valuable start-up in the world — raises concerns about the amount of influence and control the company could exercise over U.S. and global elections. Numerous corporations use their powerful ChatGPT tool to power everything from ChatBots to contention generation to computer coding.
Concerns over doctored images and communications have led OpenAI to enact an authenticity program in which digital credentials will be set by third-party AI firms that will label pictures created by the DALL-E 3 image generator. However, there are no safeguards to prevent abuse by the watchdogs themselves.
Polling from late 2023 indicates a majority of Americans are concerned that the 2024 election will be impacted by cheating. Last year, a coding error flipped votes between candidates in a Pennsylvania judicial race. Also of concern is the admission by election officials that voting machines won’t be federally certified in time for the 2024 election.
show less
OpenAI will direct ChatGPT users to the website "CanIVote.org" — run by the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) — to curb what they believe will be attempts to abuse the AI chat tool in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. NASS, an umbrella 'non-partisan' organization for state government's Secretaries of State — is run by the Republican Kansas Secretary of State, Scott Schwab. Despite evidence of irregularities, Schwab insisted there was no indication of fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
show more
Former Kansas Attorney General Phillip Kline has warned that America’s elections remain unsecured and subject to manipulation by partisan, private interests. “We have not fixed what we need to fix. Our elections are not secure, they are not inclusive, they are not transparent, and the problems that we had in 2020 will find new expression in new form in 2024, because for some reason America, collectively, is allergic to understanding the truth and initiating common-sense reforms,” Kline warned in an interview.
“[T]he left, beginning after 2000 and Bush v. Gore, started extensive efforts to ‘reform’ American election law, in other words influence it to benefit the left,” he said, explaining how the Democrats have used tools first developed in the Deep South during Reconstruction to treat voters disparately.
“[W]e’ve privatized our elections, that’s the problem,” Kline said, referring to the involvement of the likes of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in the 2020 election, through the Center for Tech and Civic Life.
Even before the 2020 election, Kline predicted private interests would distort the 2020 election. His Amistad Project organization brought lawsuits to try and stop Zuckerberg and other leftist plutocrats from pouring grossly disproportionate resources into boosting votes in Democratic areas, arguing this gave an unlawful structural advantage to one party – but judges declined to act.
“We have private resources in election offices, and when that is banned, instead those election offices contract with private parties then, to conduct the election… America’s been kicked out of the counting room, nonprofits and billionaires have been invited in,” he explained.
“[T]he most important thing in the elections [is] transparency, and we do not have transparent elections anymore. Ballots are managed off-site, they’re verified off-site, private companies are involved, and because of that America has less faith in its elections,” he concluded.
Former Kansas Attorney General Phillip Kline has warned that America's elections remain unsecured and subject to manipulation by partisan, private interests. "We have not fixed what we need to fix. Our elections are not secure, they are not inclusive, they are not transparent, and the problems that we had in 2020 will find new expression in new form in 2024, because for some reason America, collectively, is allergic to understanding the truth and initiating common-sense reforms," Kline warned in an interview.
show more
Public Wise, a left-wing “voting rights” organization, has created a database that tracks Arizona officials that the group claims are “election deniers” in a clear attempt to intimidate citizens from questioning election inconsistencies or voter fraud.
Dubbed the “Election Threat Index,” it claims 50 percent of Arizona residents are represented by state legislators who Public Wise brandelection deniers. The group says it plans to expand its communist-style lists into other states in the coming months, including Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, Florida, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
“The Election Threat Index is designed to identify local and state level officials, examine how their actions in office impact democracy, and work with grassroots partners to hold these individuals accountable, combat their attempts at voter suppression and elect pro-democracy candidates,” Public Wise said in a press release on Friday.
This is the group’s second project, designed to publicly target ideological opponents. Public Wise previously launched the “Insurrection Index,” which the group says is “an online database identifying all individuals and organizations in a position of public trust who participated, planned or promoted January 6th.”
“Our democracy doesn’t begin or end in Congress or in the White House; its fate will be determined in our communities, by our school boards, our state representatives, our sheriffs. The Election Threat Index is designed to identify these officials and understand the impact election deniers have on our right to vote and the future of our democracy. The next phase of the election denier movement is here and we’re fighting back to protect our democracy and our fundamental freedoms,” Public Wise Executive Director Christina Baal-Owens said in a statement.
show less
Public Wise, a left-wing "voting rights" organization, has created a database that tracks Arizona officials that the group claims are "election deniers" in a clear attempt to intimidate citizens from questioning election inconsistencies or voter fraud.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
Writing in his Daily Mailcolumn on Friday, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson blasted the Maine and Colorado decisions to try to keep former President Donald J. Trump off the ballot for the 2024 presidential elections.
Johnson, who has routinely been unkind about Trump, wrote of how the authoritarian attempts to keep Trump off the ballot make it impossible for Western nations to claim the moral high ground against dictatorships when their ruling elite classes act in the very same way:
Can we really say that it is the sovereign people, and the people alone, who get to decide who makes the law? I don’t think we can say that of the United States, today, where another court has just decided that Donald Trump’s name should not appear on the ballot paper for next year’s Presidential election. The judges of Maine have joined the judges of Colorado in effectively banning former President Trump from presenting himself as a candidate. I am amazed that this is not causing more general consternation.
Making clear he thinks Trump lost in 2020 while calling January 6th “dismaying”, the former Mayor of London also insisted that [Trump] did not prevent the peaceful transfer of power, and “has not been convicted of an insurrection, or an attempted insurrection.”
Refering to the former President as “an innocent man,” Johnson explains: “…think how this looks in the eyes of the rest of the world — all the places where they are fed up with being lectured about the joys of Western liberal democracy. Across the world there are dictatorial and sometimes brutal leaders who use a corrupt judicial system to disbar their opponents from seeking elective office.
“That is to say, they fabricate some charge against them at least to tie them up in legal knots — and, if necessary, actually send them to prison.
“It’s what they do in Venezuela — President Nicolas Maduro did it to his opponent. It’s what Putin did to the oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky. It’s what the Tatmadaw in Burma have done to Aung San Suu Kyi. It’s what they used to do in Ukraine — the Kremlin lackey Yanukovich locked up his opponent Yulia Timoshenko.
“Why do they lock them up? Because they are frightened of their potential popularity; because they will do anything they can to stop them appearing before the electorate.”
Johnson concludes: “It is four years since the deplorable events of January 6, 2020. The American public have had lots of time to decide what they think of Trump’s handling of the matter. They, and they alone, should decide whether he is fit for another term.”
show less
Writing in his Daily Mailcolumn on Friday, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson blasted the Maine and Colorado decisions to try to keep former President Donald J. Trump off the ballot for the 2024 presidential elections.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner insisted once again on his claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election during a debate for West Virginia gubernatorial candidates last week, stating directly, “The election was stolen, and it was stolen by the CIA.”
Warner, a supporter of Donald Trump, provided two pieces of evidence to support his latest allegation.
Firstly, Warner cited Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Meta (formerly Facebook). Zuckerberg contributed $400 million towards grants to assist organizations in conducting the 2020 election during the COVID-19 pandemic. He perceives this financial support as unethical and claims it tipped the election’s scales.
Another piece of evidence that Warner offered is the testimony provided by Mike Morrell, former Deputy Director of the CIA. Warner notes that Morrell had acknowledged a conversation between Antony Blinken and the House Judiciary Committee. The conversation related to a controversial laptop that belonged to Hunter Biden. This occurred days before intelligence officials suggested it was Russian disinformation.
MSNBC lamented: “Yes, the man responsible for overseeing West Virginia’s system of elections argued, in apparent seriousness, that the Central Intelligence Agency secretly rigged the United States’ 2020 presidential election.”
The Secretary of State also marked the CIA and FBI, not Russia or Iran, as a major concern during his campaign. He said in a June campaign stop, “It’s our own CIA and FBI, that’s very hard for me to say, but that’s what they did in 2020—they lied to the American people.”
show less
West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner insisted once again on his claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election during a debate for West Virginia gubernatorial candidates last week, stating directly, "The election was stolen, and it was stolen by the CIA."
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
I confess this is the first time I’ve heard of Mac Warner but it’s nice to see someone with some backbone even when the media and state is harassing them to change their well-informed opinion about something
I confess this is the first time I’ve heard of Mac Warner but it’s nice to see someone with some backbone even when the media and state is harassing them to change their well-informed opinion about something show more
A huge number of voters who mailed in their ballot during the 2020 election have admitted to committing some type of voter fraud, according to stunning new data from Rasmussen.
Over 20 percent of respondents admitted to filing out a ballot for a friend or family member;
17 percent said they signed someone else’s ballot with-or-without their permission;
Another 17 percent said they voted in a state where they are no-longer a permanent resident;
A stunning 1 in 10 respondents said they were offered “pay” or a “reward” for voting in 2020.
The admissions of voter fraud are especially concerning since the 2020 election saw a record-high number of mail-in ballots cast. The U.S. Census Bureau says 43 percent of voters cast their ballot by mail – more than double the number in 2016. Republicans have argued the relaxed election regulations made widespread and systemic acts of voter fraud easier, undermining the integrity of the 2020 results.
In response to accusations the election was swung to Democrats through voter fraud, President Joe Biden has stated, “…the 2020 election was the most scrutinized election ever in American history… No other election has ever been held under such scrutiny and such high standards.” Likewise, officials in the Biden government have repeatedly claimed 2020 was the most secure election ever.
In November, three Democrat candidates running in municipal elections were arrested on accusations of voter fraud, with one candidate allegedly offering $10 bribes for votes. The National Pulse reported earlier summer Michigan law enforcement raided a Democrat-linked consulting group as part of an ongoing investigation into allegations of systemic voter fraud in several localities.
show less
A huge number of voters who mailed in their ballot during the 2020 election have admitted to committing some type of voter fraud, according to stunning new data from Rasmussen.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
A Louisiana judge has declared the results of a local run-off election in the state to be “void” due to evidence of voter fraud. The November 18th race for Caddo Parish Sheriff was decided by a one vote margin – with Democrat Henry Whitehorn apparently ‘defeating’ Republican John Nickelson.
Ten days afterwards, however, Nickelson announced he would challenge the results when the parish’s Board of Election Supervisors denied his request for a hand recount.
“Many, dozens at a minimum, in the small sample of ballots we were able to inspect in the short time we had of these certificates had no signatures at all,” Nickelson said at the time. “In other words, ballots had been submitted without a voter signing it.”
The Board of Election Supervisors claimed time constraints prevented any additional scrutiny of the election ballots cast.
Four sitting judges on the state’s Supreme Court were then forced to recuse themselves due to pre-existing relationships with Nickelson, with retired Supreme Court Justice Joseph Bleich being asked to preside over the proceedings instead. Attorneys for Nickelson were able to prove conclusively several ballots were cast illegally by residents who were ineligible to vote or had voted twice by mailing an absentee ballot and casting a ballot on election day.
“This court finds that at least eleven votes should not have been counted in this one-vote-margin election. Because of the constitutional guarantee of secrecy of these ballots, it is impossible to determine the result of this election,” Bleich wrote in his ruling. “For the foregoing reasons, a new runoff election must be ordered.” The earliest a new runoff election can be held is March 23rd.
The National Pulse has previously reported three Democrats are facing voter fraud charges after attempting to rig local races in their respective states
show less
A Louisiana judge has declared the results of a local run-off election in the state to be "void" due to evidence of voter fraud. The November 18th race for Caddo Parish Sheriff was decided by a one vote margin – with Democrat Henry Whitehorn apparently 'defeating' Republican John Nickelson.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
